This is G o o g l e's cache of http://csf.colorado.edu/mail/pfvs/2001I/msg01088.html as retrieved on 25 Mar 2004 01:16:06 GMT.
G o o g l e's cache is the snapshot that we took of the page as we crawled the web.
The page may have changed since that time. Click here for the current page without highlighting.
This cached page may reference images which are no longer available. Click here for the cached text only.
To link to or bookmark this page, use the following url: http://www.google.com/search?q=cache:d1FOuijuBlcJ:csf.colorado.edu/mail/pfvs/2001I/msg01088.html++%22David+MacClement%22+site:csf.colorado.edu&hl=en


Google is not affiliated with the authors of this page nor responsible for its content.
These search terms have been highlighted: david macclement 

Re: [pf] Imagine a future with car-free cities
< < <
Date Index
> > >
Re: [pf] Imagine a future with car-free cities
by David MacClement
03 March 2001 01:43 UTC
< < <
Thread Index
> > >
At 07:21 1/3/2001 -0800, Tom Wheeler sent-on
 an article from the Seattle Times which included:

>Just imagine, Crawford suggests, the possibilities for people and enhanced
>civic places that could be created if an American city excluded cars. 
· and:
>One doesn't need to advocate a car-free society, my colleague Curtis Johnson
>argues, to want to escape the bondage of zero choices. 
· and:
> we need to reverse the slave-master relationship [with cars]." 
>Europeans, he notes, love cars too - they buy expensive ones, spend what
for us would be outrageously high sums on gas.
>"But they use autos for specialized purposes. They support a government that
>balances road and transit investments. They love their cars, but they're not
>slaves to them."
>

· It's not necessary to ban cars from cities. I'm afraid too many
alternatives are presented as either/or (at least by Americans).

· That's only one choice of many; it's suitable for certain streets, at
certain times of the day and week.

· The picture is more complex than black/white, yes/no, good/bad. After
all, it's part of life, and that's extraordinarily complex.

· In yesterday's world news section of our NZ National Radio, there was a
report on the 3-year-old decision by the City Council in Hasselt, Belgium
(50_56N, 5_20E, near Maastricht on the Maas river) to make public transit
free. Two points made were: already 2/3 of the cost is paid out of tax so
paying the other third as well would enable a much better service with far
higher ridership, and: "why should the rich not have to pay? (since they
get free bus and train travel like everyone else)" is answered by looking
at the fact that the rich pay a bigger fraction of the total tax bill than
others, so they effectively pay more per trip than others.

· So I'm guessing that there are now much fewer cars being used in Hasselt
than before.

· If the goal is to make a large reduction in car use, I think many
different strategies all in action together, is more likely to do the job,
rather than (over)simply: "ban cars!".

David.
(David MacClement) davd@ihug.co.nz 
http://www.geocities.com/davdd.geo/index.html#top
************************************************

____________________________________________________________
T O P I C A  -- Learn More. Surf Less. 
Newsletters, Tips and Discussions on Topics You Choose.
http://www.topica.com/partner/tag01

< < <
Date Index
> > >
Positive Futures List Archives
at CSF
Subscribe to Positive Futures < < <
Thread Index
> > >