This is G o o g l e's cache of http://csf.colorado.edu/mail/pfvs/2000/msg02820.html as retrieved on 27 Apr 2004 20:58:30 GMT.
G o o g l e's cache is the snapshot that we took of the page as we crawled the web.
The page may have changed since that time. Click here for the current page without highlighting.
This cached page may reference images which are no longer available. Click here for the cached text only. To link to or bookmark this page, use the following url: http://www.google.com/search?q=cache:Ql-Wy8MNi5EJ:csf.colorado.edu/mail/pfvs/2000/msg02820.html++%22David+MacClement%22+site:csf.colorado.edu&hl=en
Google is not affiliated with the authors of this page nor responsible for its content. |
| These search terms have been highlighted: | david | macclement |
|
|
Re: [pf] SUVs and conformity
< < <
Date > > >
|
< < <
Thread > > >
Re: [pf] SUVs and conformity
by David MacClement
08 February 2000 00:42 UTC
At 09:16 7/02/00 -0800, Molly wrote:
>I think the answer STILL is telecommuting. My husband's job could be
>done from home 4 of 5 days per week, with a day of meetings and
>consultation at the office. He would LOVE it and he would get more done
>than he does in small cubicles ... But like
>most employers, his company doesn't trust employees to do their jobs if
>they're not physically in the office. THIS seems to me the best solution
>of all, for those who could do jobs at home (programmers, some
>engineers, architects, some fundraisers, graphic designers, secretaries,
>some researchers, journalists, etc.).
>
** _I_ agree, but it wouldn't suit the more social kind of person. There's
a certain something about working as part of a team, or at least seeing the
same guys in the coffee- or lunch-room each day, that provides some
satisfaction, maybe security. Your husband going in on at least half-a-day
a week could go this. My first full-time job (electronic engineer, Canadian
Westinghouse, 1961) left me quite satisfied as I walked home at the end of
most days. (Didn't know /what/ to do with all that money they gave me,
though!)
> ... what Consumer Reports likes, and what's appealing to the eye.
> We would never in a million years buy a new car ... if
>you don't buy new, you avoid a lot of the hype, the feel-good buying,
>and the unnecessary extras. You focus more on the basics -- cost and
>function.
>
** When Bera and I returned from our two years volunteering in Ghana
('68-'70), we were in total agreement that all we needed was "four wheels
and an engine". We bought an old cream Ford Econoline minivan (2 front
seats only), and I cut rectangular holes in the side panels for
(rubber-grommitted) windows. Bera painted an apple tree on the sides: in
full leaf and fruit on the left side, bare black branches on the right.
That first 5 years of marriage was a great time, for us.
** But re: "SUVs and conformity"; I guess we've never been conformists,
we've made our own way through life.
{Footnote: just this morning (early) I told a jogger who stopped to ask me
whether I knew I was breaking the summer fire-ban (I said yes, but my
pruning-trash fire wasn't putting any property at risk since there was
still dew on the grass and it had recently been drizzling; and she
threatened to 'report me'), that I would make my own choice as to whether
to obey the law, and was quite willing to deal with any consequences.}
David.
(David MacClement) davd@ihug.co.nz
www.geocities.com/Athens/Delphi/3142/Pg1-AD11.html
or better: http://www.emucities.com.au/member/davd/
****************************************************
_______________________________________________________
Follow the U.S. presidential race on our Politics list!
http://www.topica.com/lists/politics
< < <
Date > > >
|
< < <
Thread > > >
|
Home