|
|
< < <
Date Index > > > |
Re: [pf] Alternative energy by David MacClement 21 March 2001 04:27 UTC |
< < <
Thread Index > > > |
At 14:41 20/3/2001 -0800, Diane Fitzsimmons wrote: >I invite pf-ers to share their thoughts on this topic. ... What do you envision as necessary to supply your energy needs? > · Note the last 3 paragraphs in the Berkeley National Laboratory item here: http://ens.lycos.com/ens/feb2001/2001L-02-05-06.html , which I found after my last post to PF, has: Computer-Related Electricity Use Overestimated BERKELEY, California, February 5, 2001 (ENS) - A new study of the power consumed by office computers and Internet equipment by a group at the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory has found that this equipment uses about 2% of the total electricity use in the U.S. The finding contradicts a 1999 study by Mark Mills ... which claimed that electricity use associated just with the Internet totaled about 8% of all U.S. electricity use ... The Berkeley Environmental Energy Technologies Division's End-Use Energy Forecasting Group ... examined the assumptions and conclusions of the Mills report ... "Mills assumes, for example, that the active power of a personal computer plus monitor is 1000 watts, when the measured data for a Pentium III PC with a 17 inch monitor show total active power use of 135 watts." About 70% of U.S. computer and network power consumption comes from the commercial sector, the researchers found. ... Power management features found on many devices including computers, printers and fax machines currently save about 23 TWh/year. ... Various other researchers, including: Jay Hakes, formerly of the Dept of Energy's Energy Information Admin., * Amory Lovins of the Rocky Mountain Institute, and Joseph Romm, director of the Center for Energy and Climate Solutions, have also raised serious questions about the Mills study's methodologies and results. Beyond estimating the direct energy use of office and network equipment, Koomey's group is beginning to assess the indirect effects of the Internet on resource use in the U.S. economy. These effects include structural changes - where new institutional arrangements and technological capabilities become possible because of the Internet - and substitution effects - where the new technologies substitute for established energy uses. An example of a substitution effect would be the use of Internet shopping in place of routine trips to the grocery store or the mall, which might reduce personal transportation energy use. A structural change scenario might involve a decline in brick and mortar retail stores in favor of warehousing of retail goods for direct home delivery. The End-Use Energy Forecasting Group is currently analyzing energy use of emerging technologies such as Web phones, handheld computers and Internet terminals, which are not yet included in the Berkeley Lab estimates. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - sent on by David. (David MacClement) davd@ihug.co.nz http://www.geocities.com/davdd.geo/index.html#top ************************************************ ____________________________________________________________ T O P I C A -- Learn More. Surf Less. Newsletters, Tips and Discussions on Topics You Choose. http://www.topica.com/partner/tag01
|
< < <
Date Index > > > |
Positive Futures List Archives at CSF | Subscribe to Positive Futures |
< < <
Thread Index > > > |