I've recently been involved in many discussions involving the DMCA, and I've come to a several conclusions: 1) In the last few years there seems to have been more done to restrict the trafficing of digitized music than to stop child pornography online. 2) The vagueness of this act makes it seem as though simply owning a Caller ID or hardware firewall is illegal and subject to fine. 3) If all those who have shared files illegally on peer to peer networks were fined even the minimum amount of money per item they shared, I can assure that the majority will not be able to pay, thus will spend time in jail. Has anyone in congress considered how crowded our country's jail system will become? Moreover, all those serving a sentence will not be paying taxes, they will not be working the jobs that keep this country going, they will not be purchasing money to keep the economy afloat, they will simply be sitting in an institution that will be payed for by the government. This means money will have to come from tax dollars to expand jails around the country, to build new ones, and to keep the inmates fed. 4) It was we, the consumers, who built up all those large companies to what they are today. This act discriminates against us, and without us purchasing albums, the RIAA wouldn't even exist. 5) What about those of us who own a CD that has been severely scratched, or a cassette that has been played to the point where it begins to warp. What if a record has been left out in the sun too long? Do we once again have to purchase the item? I find it makes more sense to back up any CD I buy right away, then use the archived copy to listen to while the bought copy sits in a safe spot where it can not be damaged. I believe as a consumer, I have the right to insure I can always receive satisfaction from what I buy. 6) This will not stop file sharing. There will always be a market for it, be it legal or not. Alcahol was made illegal, and it made things worse until finally it was legalized again. Marijuana is illegal, but I have personally witnessed many people using it. 7) What of albums that have gone out of print? In particular, a few years back, I was searching to find a rare vinyl from a band which only put out 300 copies. I was unable to find it anywhere, and I tried using ebay, pawn shops, and any internet resource I could think of. Finally I saw the three songs on it to download. I know what I did was technically illegal, but if I could buy a copy of the vinyl I would. Only one of those songs was ever released anywhere except on that particular release, and the other two are so obscure that I'm yet to meet anyone other than myself who has even heard them. I've since fallen out of my liking for that band and deleted the tracks, but I'm sure there are many others who have had a problem of tracking down a rare album, video, or painting perhaps and being unable to find the item, settling for a copy in mp3, divx, or tiff. Thank you for reading all my comments. My apologies for taking up so much room and for being so lengthy, but I didn't want to produce any confusion (unlike the writers of the DMCA).