Playing with fire - when the honest informer becomes “the reactionary.”

Things are getting unbelievable; however, this is eventual.
I understand things well enough to go through the lines of thought rationally.
That fine line, the distinction is essential, just as context is essential; so true does this show a media landscape that blurs the lines after losing their way.
For each step toward modernized corruption, for any success requires a support system, and a surface more attractive than the inside.  Back-pocket public support is required to keep the machine running.

Corruption spreads corruption, because the core is proven to be ego.
It is not on my part to mix messages.
It is for their part to take advantage of people’s wants, and shut out the reality where it is deemed ill-suited for their constituents.
The honest informer is now being called the reactionary (and in many contexts).

We can’t pay for any of this — “support” for developing technologies in the public sector, dragging everything down.  All of this after the ban on Federal funding for stem cell research was lifted (the actual research was not banned, that being what was implied in the hidden message).
Nancy Pelosi using “kicking in doors, pulling families out of their homes is un-American” to promote illegal immigration in California.  Psychopathic politicians like Pelosi may have it the other way around: kicking in doors, pulling ordinary citizens of their homes (with the defense of propaganda; stereotypes in ads, of course).  Taking full advantage of gullible people.  And what is happening is unbelievable.
I’ve not heard this conjecture from anybody but myself.

Irresponsibility to be rewarded makes for a weakened/broken economy.  What do you expect when fundamentals go unsupported?  And now it’s everybody blaming everybody else (and not just in WDC), over some stupid bonuses.  Irrational protests over an effect of the 2008 bail-out... and not to see that it was never government’s business in the first place.
Those that know better are ahead of the curve on this.

From celebrity, to politician, the word narcissism is easy to throw around.  This unbridled love of the self can bring about worse in bad times.
Hollywood actors have the rights to do what they do within the law, but politicians in any days of lowered standards take advantage of their supporters for moves to change the laws to fit themselves, and their partners.
Corruption never goes away on it’s own.

And so, we are all playing with fire.  Once probable chaos looms, those that have continued to make things worse (all for a temporary advantage) will be out of the first to be targeted, as rioters “take dibs on the capital.”
It may be “big business” now, as it was during the great depression, but eventually, each side of the argument as to “what should be done” will come crashing down on the centers that want as much power as possible.  The public set up these systems, just to burn them down (sound familiar?).

Violence is only capped personally; otherwise, government will be forced to increase the means to a police state status (over a welfare state).  What could happen in the near future isn’t even recognizable anymore, given certain perversions in society are seen as ‘normal’.  What happened in the 2004 and 2008 elections, in St. Paul, Minnesota, where reporters were arrested, with equipment taken by the F.B.I. was part of an ongoing, tactiful infringement on First Amendment rights.
Imagine how much worse things must get if violence should break out in this so-called technologically superior era — I’ve mentioned nuclear warmongering before, and I get another déjà vû just mentioning it here; I must be careful.

Only the individual is responsible for their well-being, as betterment starts with the self.  It is criminal to go down the same road of corruption.
Don’t do worse.  Don’t promote these zero-sum games.  Don’t you see that ‘zero-sum’ partly means ‘no improvement to be had’?
As violence is never the answer, make sure you can trust yourselves.