Mona Charen vs. Ellen Goodman

 Mona Charen is Abel; Ellen Goodman is Cain. Mrs. Charen wrote about her frustation that women, even many Republican women, were bowled over by Clinton and saw him as more attractive instead of putting their thinking cap on and seeing that conservatives are right and liberals are wrong. She wrote: 'We never should have given the women the vote,' grumbled a well-known conservative at a recent Washington D.C. gathering. The pundit was joking-- but the persistent gender gap in polling has led many conservatives to despair about what they perceive as soft-headedness on the part of American women." She goes on to say she is the person "who lamented giving women the vote. I've been frustrated by their credulousness regarding the president and willingness to believe that something with a nice name -- like the Violence Against Women Act -- is necessarily a nice law." She says women need to be educated. This is exactly what the anti-suffragists knew would happen if women got the vote. They would weaken America. Mona Charen says she's joking about women not understanding government. I'm not. With rare exceptions, like Mona Charen, women don't understand government force. The real violence against women act was the 19th amendment that gave women the vote and ushered in a century that has brought more violence to women than any before.

The liberal feminist columnist, Ellen Goodman, wrote an article praising those women who fought for the vote. She said they were "a small band assembled in Seneca Falls, N.Y., in 1848" who wrote their goal down on paper saying "that it was the duty of women to secure to themselves their sacred right to the elective franchise." They worked tirelessly for seventy years and won. Goodman writes that they never stopped even though they were ridiculed. The Washington Post said in its 1906 obituary of Susan B. Anthony that she was "a leader of that circle of masculine womanhood that clamored for 'woman's rights'..." Doesn't that say it best? Masculine women nagging. Isn't Father saying the same thing?

Goodman goes on saying, "If women voted, it was said, they would lose their femininity, the home would fall apart, children would be neglected. 'Woman,' wrote one newspaper, 'should not unsex herself by dabbling in the filthy pool of politics.'" Goodman sees progress; I don't. I see women cops and children on drugs. After the 1996 election, Ellen Goodman wrote of how women were the deciding factor in getting Clinton reelected. She says,"Much was made of the 'feminizing' of this campaign .... the Republicans based their campaign on anti-government, anti-taxes .... Democrats made a much more concerted and successful attempt to speak the female language."

The exit polls showed that this was the"first time in American history that men alone would have elected a different candidate than women alone. Men chose Dole 44 percent to 43 percent, while women chose Clinton 54 percent to 37 percent."

This is precisely the doom that the anti-suffragists of the 19th century predicted for our forefathers if they let women get the vote." I see that their prediction came true and there is"doom" ; Ellen sees an improvement. The Messiah spends a billion dollars to help the conservatives and American are more powerful and vote liberal.

One current book against the Antis said,"...beginning with the start of World War I in Europe and continuing through America's years of participation some opponents of suffrage engaged in smear campaigns. The most common charge during the war years was that [the suffragists] were somehow pro-socialist (after 1917, pro-Bolshevik)." It wasn't a smear campaign; it was campaign for God. Suffragists efforts whether they intended it or not brought socialism and helped the Bolsheviks. The author continues:"Mrs. James Wadsworth, the leader of antisuffragist forces in the last years of their fight to halt women's enfranchisement, painted the suffrage movement as a dangerous and un-American outbreak intimately connected with 'socialism,' and other aspects of radicalism. Antisuffrage publications, including Woman's Protest and Woman Patriot made the same point and identified suffragists as 'pacifists and socialists.' Other critics underlined the theme: 'If the Kaiser can get the pacifists, socialists, and suffragists to weaken America ... the cause of America ... will be lost.'" America did become weak. The suffragists castrated the men of America. As women became more powerful, the men became weaker. Mrs. Wadsworth was right in saying that socialism/feminism is"dangerous" and"un-American." She loved America and knew that our freedoms and the safety of women and children come from strong men fighting and dying for those freedoms. Women getting the vote would emasculate men and therefore endanger women and children and America. Are women and children safer today than in Mrs. Wadsworth time before the vote? Do you think if only men were in Congress during the second World War that we would have watched Hitler bomb London and invade Poland and do nothing? Do you think that we would have lost North Korea? Do you think that we would have lost Vietnam? Do you think it would still be unsafe to walk the streets at night?

Below are two pictures of ladies on the Abel side. The first is Alice Wadsworth. The second is Mrs. Dodge.

The leading suffragist countering Mrs. Dodge and Mrs. Wadsworth was Alice Paul. She never married, like Susan B. Anthony and today's Gloria Steinem. She said women need "a place of equal responsibility and equal power with men of the nation." She was a militant who went dragging and kicking as police would take her to jail for her demonstrations.

Wadsworth said the anti-suffragists were warriors in a battle against the "two great enemies of our civilization -- Feminism and Socialism." Women's Federation should praise these women instead of Eleanor Roosevelt. Both Dodge and Wadsworth were active in volunteer organizations. Wadsworth took over Dodge's position and held it until the vote came in 1920. As its new leader, one of the first things she did was revamp the anti-suffrage monthly Woman's Protest into a weekly, named Woman Patriot. On its masthead she broadcast their creed: "For Home and National Defense Against Woman Suffrage, Feminism and Socialism."

Suffragists accused the Antis of being idle, elitist, bridge-playing socialites who never left home. The Antis continually pointed out that they did not make a fetish of the home. They urged women to be volunteers. Mrs. Josephine Dodge was the first president of a national organization against the vote started in 1912. At one of their meetings she said, "We believe that women according to their leisure, opportunities, and experience should take part increasingly in civic and municipal affairs as they always have done in charitable, philanthropic and educational activities and we believe that this can best be done without the ballot by women, as a non-partisan body of disinterested workers." Another Anti said forcefully, "Do not mistake me. No woman should spend all her time at home. Public needs and social duties must be attended to."

After 1920 Antisuffragists continued to fight against feminism. They correctly denounced the labor movement, pacifists, socialists, and feminism. One liberal book said,"The Daughters of the American Revolution, which had metamorphosed into a superpatriotic and right-wing organization, also provided an outlet for former Antis interested in red-baiting feminists. One pamphlet distributed by the DAR decried the 'six objectives of Communism, Bolshevism, Socialism, Liberalism and Ultra Pacifism' as the abolition of government, patriotism, property rights, inheritance, religion, and family relations." Red-baiting? No. Just telling the truth. .

Satan won the 70 year battle to give women power over men. Father was born in 1920 with mankind sliding down the slippery slope of socialism/feminism for another 70 years. By the time he called for champions to help him everyone was brainwashed with Satan's lie. It is incredibly difficult for Father to deal with such spiritual cripples in today's society.

Stanton wrote down her goals

Elizabeth Cady Stanton ended her Declaration of Sentiments and Resolutions at the Seneca Falls Convention with this paragraph:"In entering upon the great work before us, we anticipate no small amount of misconception, misrepresentation, and ridicule; but we shall use every instrumentality within our power to effect our object. We shall employ agents, circulate tracts, petition the State and National legislature, and endeavor to enlist the pulpit and the press in our behalf. We hope this Convention will be followed by a series of Conventions embracing every part of the country."

She worked tirelessly for the rest of her life to end patriarchy. The story of the suffragists is like the story of all communists, socialists, and liberals who turned the world from the path it was on in the 19th century to create the nightmare of the 20th. They loved government more than God. And they won a total victory. It took 70 years to get the vote and 70 more years to get a career congresswoman, Pat Schroeder, to get women to be fighter pilots, get shot down and be raped in the Gulf War with complete approval by a Republican President, his Secretary of Defense, Joint Chiefs of Staff and the American people. Will it take another 70 years to get women back in the home and into charity? If it does then I won't see it. But someday my descendents will.

Stanton wrote on a speech she gave in 1866 a note to her daughters saying:"I give this manuscript to my precious daughters, in the hope that they will finish the work I have begun." I give this book to my eight precious sons and daughters, in the hope they will finish the work I have begun to restore the traditional family that socialist/feminists have destroyed. Jesus said we have to carry a cross. Our cross is to teach the truth that used to be common sense and now is looked at as crazy. Stanton was a fighter. First Lady Hillary Clinton is a fighter. I pray the UC sisters will be greater fighters and still be feminine and finish the job anti-suffragists, such as Mrs. Wadsworth and Mrs. Dodge worked so hard for.

Stanton said these fighting words once:"We do not expect our path will be strewn with the flowers of popular applause, but over the thorns of bigotry and prejudice will be our way, and on our banners wll beat the dark storm-clouds of opposition from those who have entreched themselves behind the stormy bulwarks of custom and authority, and who have fortified their positions by every means, holy and unholy. But we will steadfastly abide the result. Unmoved we will bear it aloft. Undaunted we will unfurl it to the gale, for we know that the storm cannot rend it a shred, that the electric flash will but more clearly show to us the glorious words inscribed upon it, 'Equality of Rights.'"

This is one tough lady. She wrote her goals, made the committment and became a workaholic till she dropped of old age. So am I. In the end, my written goals in this book will happen because God is behind it and he isn't behind socialist/feminists such as Stanton.

She and her army of socialist/feminists crushed men and women with their false equality and false rights. Their ideology rules. Let's be more persevering than the enemy. Let's restore true equality and true responsibilities.

Mary Pride explains, "Each elder should be disciplining the men under his care into future elders. Each elder's wife and other qualified mature women should be doing the same with the women. Each set of parents should be training their own children. Everyone has the goal of becoming a leader 'qualified to teach others' (2 Timothy 2:2, Hebrew 5:12)."

"The church is set up to meet these goals. People are to be evangelized, then disciplined, which means trained until they are able to be trainers themselves. This is what the church is for. It is not an infirmary for permanent spiritual cripples, or a playground for permanent spiritual babies. We are not merely consumers (beyond our initial spiritual babyhood) but producers! We have a mission, each and every one of us!"

Mary Pride says it is tragic that many Christian missionaries "unwittingly set about destroying the tribal patriarchal patterns" in countries they went to "and substituting their own increasingly egalitarian and feminist model." American UC members should be respecting and teaching patriarchy in other nations too. It was wrong of General McArthur to give women the vote in Japan after World War II.

Mary Pride says a church should be, "a spiritual army." Instead it has "become a counseling center instead of a military base. We need to get organized -- not as some sort of cultist top-down pyramid, but as a grass-roots network of individual families empowered to do our job and held together by our churches." 

Reverend Moon has even changed the very name of his organization from being called a church to being about families.  Instead of Unification Church it is now called Family Federation for World Peace and Unification (FFWPU).  The solution to mankind's problems comes from fixing our families, not from churches and legislatures.  When families are peaceful and united then there will be world peace and unity.  The focus should be on the leadership in families, not the leadership of the State.  The leader of the State should first be a good leader of his family. The Bible says that a man must first have built a good family before he can lead others.  Hillary Clinton wrote a book called It Takes a Village.  Village to her is the federal government.  The title of her book should be It Takes Big Government.  She has not been able to create an exemplary family.  In the future when mankind comes to its senses it will not let anyone be in leadership who has not shown excellent leadership in the family.  The Left was very wrong to not impeach Clinton for "just" having an affair and defiling the Oval Office, let alone for the lying he did in court.

Pat Schroeder worked for 24 years to get the government to force people to do what she felt was best for the family.  All of her legislation that she got passed and tried but didn't was a waste of time and just made families more dysfunctional.  She is not a champion of the family; she is its worst nightmare.  She was so busy being a busy-body that she never cooked a meal for her family.  Her view that big government regulations to force people to pay high taxes for everything from minimum wage laws to women becoming combat pilots just threw a wrench in the machinery of families.  Because of big government and naive zealots like her most families do not run as well-oiled machines. (She was also the force behind getting women to be combat fighter pilots and thereby weakening our military.)

BIBLE

The Bible is the greatest book ever written because it reveals the most truth of any book.  Therefore the Judeo-Christian culture will have the greatest truth.  The greatest cornerstone of a happy life is a loving marriage and family.  The Bible begins with the Book of Genesis explaining that the first marriage on earth went sour because Adam and Eve listened to the angel Lucifer who became Satan.

The theme of this book is that the true cultural war is between God's champions and Satan's champions. The intellectual elite in America have written books and work through organizations that have changed the thinking of the average person. Those on the Right say that the cultural elite dominate America with their feminist/socialist ideology. Those on the Left feel the Right has too much power and give examples of Rush Limbaugh's huge audience on radio and conservatives like Reagan and Bush being President. Michael Medved calls himself a cultural crusader on his talk radio show and website. He constantly says that the Left is the ruling ideology and must be stopped. He says that the vast majority of people have been brainwashed by public education. Teachers are generally feminist/socialists and have created a society that is basically politically correct and therefore believe in things that he calls "ridiculous."

ABSOLUTE VALUES

In this book I praise people like Medved for the good they do, but unfortunately the intellectuals on the Right are often wrong. They do not go far enough. God teaches absolute values. Rev. Moon teaches absolute values -- especially in the area of men/women relationships. He calls his ideology "Absolute Sex." Unfortunately, his followers, called Unificationists, have been digested by this corrupt culture and do not always teach and live by absolute values.

PATRIARCHY

In this book I teach that Aubrey and Helen Andelin write the absolute truth about men and women. They are Mormons but many Mormons do not live by Andelin's ideology. Aubrey Andelin told me on the phone once that what he writes is not Mormon teaching or his teaching, but the teaching of the Bible. The real battle for people 's minds in God's view is whether people accept the Bible or not. Many Christians do not believe in the absolute roles taught by St. Paul. Ephesians 5:21 clearly says that families and society are to be patriarchal. The average Christian and Unificationist do not believe this. They do not believe that men are to be the only leaders in the home and in society. The Andelins are right and everyone who disagrees is wrong.

The Bible teaches that men are to provide, protect and guide their families and society. Most Christians and Unificationists feel women earning money in the military and police force is perfectly fine. It is an abomination of God. Women leading men in business, government and education hurts everyone.

FREE WILL

God gave us free will and the first couple on earth rejected God's commandment and obeyed Satan's.  Throughout human history God and Satan have sent their champions to teach.  Those who have spoken for God have taught the truth and those who represent Satan have taught lies.  In the Bible we learn that the greatest turning point in history was Jesus' teachings.  He said people are of the devil and not of God.  He said, "Satan is the ruler of this world."

God's messengers are usually rejected in their own lifetimes and are often in great danger when they speak out.  Jesus and many other saints and sages who God spoke through have been ignored, jailed, mocked, tortured and murdered.  God is speaking through me in this book and I have no illusions that I will be readily accepted.  Some of the intellectual elite of my own church has criticized me in its church publications. History repeats itself over and over.  God speaks through his messengers and the messengers are denounced.  The vast majority of fallen man always rejects the truth in the beginning and sincerely feels that to ban or kill the messenger is a public service.

WOMEN COPS

The truth that I am revealing hurts like all truths do.  What is the truth I am bringing?  It is this: men and women are different and have different roles.  Satan believes the opposite and because he rules this world, we have everyone in America believing that men and women are not different and they can interchange roles.  The most obvious manifestation of this fact of life is that we have women cops.

MEAN AND STUPID

God's laws for human happiness are an unknown to people.  Satan makes the common sense rules of life of God look mean and stupid.  You are reading this and probably thinking I am mean and stupid to think that no woman should be a cop. Satan believes it is wonderful that women are police officers with guns on their hips riding alone in squad cars in the middle of the night.  The list of all the idiotic things that people believe from Satan is very long.

WOMEN GET THE VOTE

In the 20th century, America made its greatest mistake when it gave women the vote.  This slippery slope of giving women leadership has ended with congresswoman Pat Schroeder getting it legal for women to be combat fighter pilots.  The brainwashing of America is so complete that every precious core belief in the Bible is rejected by the majority.  When America and the West gave women the vote they gave a green light to every perversion.  The world has hit rock bottom because it deeply believes that free love and homosexuality are normal. The absolute values taught in Bible means nothing to the vast majority of Americans.

PATRIARCHY

The ideology of Satan that men and women are interchangeable is feminism.  The formal declaration of this diabolical teaching came in the writings of Karl Marx, Friedrich Engels, and Elizabeth Cady Stanton in 1848.  They attacked the Biblical traditional family and eventually crushed it.  The core belief of God is patriarchy.  A few groups have the sense and guts to proclaim an aspect of patriarchy.  The Southern Baptists and the Mormons are not afraid of the "P" word.

Communists, socialists and feminists have successfully destroyed the concept of patriarchy.  Those who still believe in old-fashioned values are dismissed as ignorant dinosaurs. My church hates me for saying men and women are fundamentally different and therefore have absolute roles.  Absolutes are very difficult for fallen man.  I am not welcome in my church and some have screamed at me and my wife as being a disgrace and not teaching what the church believes.  My church believes that Jesus came as the messiah and the Bible is the word of God but they see us as extremists kooks who give our church a bad name.  But if we look at what the Bible says I believe we have to be absolute about men and women.  I am not being an unrealistic, reactionary fringe Neanderthal who is not modern and intelligent.

Let's begin by looking at one group I found on the Web that teaches patriarchy in the home and in the church. At
http://www.cbmw.org/questions/index.html this group says that only men lead in the home and in the church. But they are not against women leading everywhere else.  They write:

They go on to say: "Yet to be surpassed, Recovering Biblical Manhood and Womanhood by John Piper and Wayne Grudem offers the most complete and extensive refutation of the egalitarian position. All of the authors in this book are well-established scholars, and each chapter provides a book’s worth of insight."

Well, I disagree that Gruden and Piper's book is the best book against the feminists. They do not go far enough with their logic. I surpass their book because I am absolute.  The authors don't go far enough with their logic.  They say they are not sure about women leading men in society. Where is the logic here?  Fallen man has the hardest time about seeing truth as universal.  We want to make exceptions and always want to water down God's laws.  Not being sure about God's laws is something that fallen man is good at.  I am sure.  I am totally logical.  There are no exceptions with me anymore than there are exceptions for some doctors who don't have to scrub before surgery and some people who can overcome gravity and walk off cliffs.

The slippery slope of women leading men anywhere can only result in the abomination of women cops and homosexuality and rampant divorce.  We have to be totally consistent and logical in our thinking.  We have to take our ideas to their logical conclusion.  If men are absolutely head of the home and church then they are head of everything else, including government.

SHAME

At the website for this group they interview Marvin Olansky for their magazine Journal for Biblical Manhood and Womanhood (Winter 1998). The article is called "The Impact of Feminism." He says, "God does not forbid women to be leaders in society, generally speaking, but when that occurs it's usually because of the abdication of men.  As in the case of Deborah and Barak, there's a certain shame attached to it.  I would vote for a woman for the presidency, in some situations, but again, there is a certain shame attached.  Why don't you have a man who is able to step forward?  God's word says very plainly that an elder is to be a man."

Olansky is typical of fallen man who can never see a world of absolutes.  Shame is something that feminists hate.  They have opened the floodgate to shamelessness.  It used to be that illegitimacy was shameful.  No more.  Divorce was shameful. No more.  Men providing for their families.  No more.  Olansky is wrong in saying God thinks women can be president.  It makes no sense.  It violates logic and common sense and biology.  It is ridiculous.  But Olansky has been, along with everyone else, overcome like the frog who was slowly boiled to death in a pot of water.  He never saw it coming and doesn't know what has hit him.

FROG BOILED TO DEATH

Either women vote or not. Either they are president or not. There are many black and white, right and wrong issues and God has no interest in bipartisanship with Satan.  There is no compromise about drinking poison and there should be no compromise about women leading men.  It only castrates them.  Satan wants to emasculate and weaken men.  He has done a good job.  Men are now a bunch of pathetic sissies who fall over themselves to salute a woman general as an advancement in civilization.  Conservatives like Ronald Reagan put a woman in the Supreme Court. Republicans are just watered down Democrats. Republicans are often more godly and correct but they are generally boiled like the frog.

What I am saying is so revolutionary it will probably take many years, perhaps centuries, for people to understand.  I don't think of myself as superior or better than everyone,  I just happened to be one of those pioneers who saw the truth for whatever reason and took responsibility to speak out.  I hope it does not endanger my family but I have no choice but to be God's messenger.  What I write is not Godwin's agenda or some other group's agenda, it is God's agenda.  I am a voice crying in the wilderness and I will probably not see the day when women get off their police motorcycle and become stay-at-home moms who serve their husbands like the Bible and every other major religious teaching says to do (such as the Koran).  I may not see the day when what I write is denounced as Islamic cruelty to women.  I am sad sometimes that my wife and I have to be alone on this course for a while, but someday the truth will rise.  Virtually everyone at the beginning of the 21st century is a feminist and rejects the biblical family as limiting for women -- as a boring box -- as some have told me in my own church, but truth always rises.  No one believes the earth is flat anymore.  And someday there will be no women coming home in body bags from being soldiers in wars like they do now.  Someday women will go home and serve their husbands and children while the men go out and serve their customers.  Each has their God-given roles and I will never rest until every person hears this simple truth.

Anti-Suffragists

I dedicate this book to the women who fought against the feminist suffragists.  They fought against feminism and socialism and lost.  Shortly before 1920, a group of true women started a magazine called The Woman Patriot. The subtitle said, "Dedicated to the Defense of the Family and the State AGAINST Feminism and Socialism." Like the Antis we are called to fight the uphill battle to restore traditional family values and laissez-faire capitalism.

Stanton and Anthony are the worst women in the 19th century and are heroes in American history books now, but those who have been relegated to the trash bin of history -- those wonderful women who were called Antis, are the real heroes.  In the 20th century the worst woman was Betty Friedan who wrote her sickening bestseller, The Feminine Mystique, that has hurt countless people.  The antidote for the poison of books like Friedan's are books like Fascinating Womanhood by Helen Andelin and Man of Steel and Velvet by Aubrey Andelin. I have communicated by phone and in writing with the Andelins and Helen told me women should not have got the vote. She does not say this in her books. In fact I have never seen anyone in any book written since 1920 when women got the vote that says we should repeal the 19th amendment. As far as I know, I am the first. I have an uphill battle to fight but I have God on my side and therefore will eventually win. Until then I have to feel God's heart to see the terrible effects on people's lives around me as they live by Satan's ideology of feminism. And it is especially sad to see so-called anti-feminists not see the plain truth I write. On the other hand, I am optimistic and confident for the future and have the consolation that this massive ignorance and danger I live in will fade away someday. I take the responsibility of being a patriarch and therefore see long range like patriarchs do. The future is bright.  

---