SDM's "Daniel G"
After the continuous exposure of SDM's disgraceful past in Sahaja Yoga, he lost so much credibility that he needed to reinvent himself to control his Cult SDM members and undermine the Sahaja Yogis who were exposing him.
A pseudo-Sahaja Yogi who continually attacked the real Sahaja Yogis and who could gently but discreetly support his followers would be the ideal invention. But one was needed who could be far more subtle than his "Rudra" character ( a previous invention of his) who was very quickly exposed by Sahaja Yogis.
Such a character appeared on the anti-SY forum shortly after the exposure of his secret homosexuality where his rage was channeled into creating and sustaining this new character.
He can only write as this character late in the evenings from his PC in order to hide his new home IP address because he still posts during the day as SDM from his workplace.
During the day SDM now only posts from his workplace, a Business School, and this has only happened since the creation of his new character. The archives and IP's prove this.
But after being accused publicly for his false SY character he immediately set up a two way conversation with him from his workplace, simply relaying from his home PC the messages from his false SY character.
This new character he has called "Daniel G" who writes as "iced logic", "cool little stream", "wind in the scales", "passing hammer" and "stillflame".
Read carefully through the weight of evidence before seeing the hard evidence at the end of this webpage.
---------------------------------------
His first "Daniel G" character message on the anti list:
|
| From: Date: Sat Aug 2, 2003 10:06 pm Subject: Living flame |
| Hello everyone - this is my first post so I'd just like to welcome you all to my computer screen and hope you welcome me to yours in return. Ahh, I think a fresh starting point is best for me rather than to reply to threads that I don't know the full storey to. I got my self realisation almost 5 years ago and live in London... My name is Daniel and I like to create... |
Note: The repetition of mispelled words throughout "Daniel's" messages that cannot be natural typos but are deliberate mispellings demonstrate the attempt to reveal that he is in fact another well known member from the anti-SY forum;
Examples: storey (instead of story) possitive dettachment argumantativeness adicted adiction reffered writting Karttekeya insite
accross dissagree refferences oppening acuse focusses affraid suficient dirrected centances
These are unnatural typos that no genuine poster would repeatedly make and are therefore deliberate.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
He soon starts preaching, ironically to Nutmeg (as Kaiya) who is using another false i.d breaking her ban:
Msg 13207
Then starts Preaching To Marzi:
|
| From: Date: Mon Aug 4, 2003 2:47 pm Subject: Re: [SY] As predicted |
|
Do you actually know what hell is???
It is you shouting at your own ego that is reflected in how you mold your words around other peoples egos.
Watch someone saying - O I wish you would go to hell - what they are actually doing is shouting at there own ego and literally putting it into hell untill they can forgive themselves. Try it.
|
------------------------------------------------------
Pitching in with his pseudo-SY cover:
|
| From: Date: Wed Aug 6, 2003 8:33 pm Subject: The lamb |
| sounds like there is a lamb around here... > I think your BLAHS are not yogically correct. According to the BLAH > Encyclopedia published by Mrs Nirmala BLAH BLAH each BLAH should be preceded > and ended by a BLAH bandhan. > Soak your feet in BLAH water before doing it!! > > Mig BLAH But can you forgive Shri Mataji for being the way she is??? it seems not... this is perhaps where the root of your fatigue is. Well I forgive you anyway. |
----------------------------------------------
And more of the same:
Msg 13272
I know you don't... you need you own.
Miguel Henriques <[email protected]> wrote:
are you trikon yogi?
the message was adressed explicitly to Trikion Yogi.
Don't need your forgiveness, guvernor.
Miguel
--------------------------------------------------------------
And more, establishing himself as a SYogi to the anti's and gaining control of their minds through "generous" comments:
Msg 13300
[Note: "from the belly of Lord vishnu".. quote being apt because he believed he was a reincarnation of Lord Vishnu, and seemingly still does believe he is on some 'Divine' mission.]
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Answering himself to cover himself further:
|
| From: Date: Mon Aug 11, 2003 11:03 am Subject: Re: [SY] Re: to furat and ivan |
|
|
I was refering to Ivan and his proper channels hang-up he has - seeming to come from a superior ideal... Not too sure what your on about though mateo...
What exactly did Shri Mataji do? - the doing just happens around her. If someone comes in with a force one way or another against Shri Kundalini - they feel that equal force spin them off into a rebound of illusion. Seems like it has happened to you, but it seems like it has is happening to Ivan.
The Kundalini is fully protected from the void - but is self-supported. Not me or you or any of us can even have a close estimate of the total power of these 2 forces. They are blinking your eyes now and even moving your eyes to read this message. If you are aware of this or not it is of no difference. Do you think you are doing, o part of the Virata?
> Didn't you know that Mother created this for the |
------------------------------------------------------
More of the same to deepen the deception:
|
| From: Date: Mon Aug 11, 2003 11:38 am Subject: SDM |
| SDM, there was always a chance that one day you would actually come accross an incarnation. And next to them it would be quite obvious that you are not one. You have no strength of void to offer and feed no original awareness through your Nabhi... You knew this may happen one day. What you may not have realised is that your anti-guru behavior runs a high risk of you being un-created from the virata. So what I'll do is give you 6 days to turn away... your move. Shri Mataji is the fountain of Gurus and it is very easy to tell some one who is not a Guru as they just quote what others say and reffer to things that are written. Where is your original awareness that stems from your self that you feed to the sheep? I feel that if the tide came in you would be washed away with the first wave... Its all very well for me to be sweet and pleasant, but anti-Guru behavior gets its reward. Both you and Ivan are behaving in such a manner. Being anti or pro Sahaj in your identification is neither here nor there and really for both of you I snap the flags you wave in glory of your own mis-guildence. |
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Abusing Sattwa because she exposed his false SYogi status:
|
| From: Date: Mon Aug 11, 2003 6:46 pm Subject: Re: [SY] In your heart |
|
What a pathetic excuse for a human being you are... I know Shri Krishna through enjoyment - not by attending each puja by law. Do you think I feel bad for not attending? I don't, my enjoyment envelopes the universe + not a hall with a few select dedicated yogis. My enjoyment includes these, it includes SDM and it flows through all that my attention is on and isnt on.
Is your enjoyment really only limited to the yogis that attended the Puja yesterday??? I feel pity for.
|
--------------------------------------------
Dropping names to cover up his imminent exposure:
|
| From: Date: Tue Aug 12, 2003 8:11 am Subject: Re: [SY] Ways of Ovaltine |
|
You have my real name - where am I running?
I need not your verification... I have spent time with 2 of the the original 1st 7 Yogis from England. I am have met Shri Mataji and shared my artwork with her. She has browsed through prints with Derek that I have given... and I am very close to Pranava a great Yogi who has spent much time with Shri mataji. A of mine was at the Ealing Ashram in London, and I spent much time at the excellent Chelsham Road Ashram where I sat in the Heart of the heart of the heart...
There is nothing I seek from people like you - I am self-content with my meditation and my connection to shri mataji... I forgive you for your lack of vision, that is an easy thing to do. Can you forgive me? you seem to be having trouble with that - why not get some help from the Yogis that are around you? That is one of the greatest things about Sahaja Yoga - that there is always a willing yogi who has just what you need vibrationally to move you on from your catch.
-All the best Daniel.
PS - feel free to ask Derek - the UK leader about me if you are really that hung up about me... he knows me too.
|
[Note: We did check with what he said in this message. And Derek confirmed he is lying.]
---------------------------------------------
More name dropping to cover his imminent exposure:
|
| From: Date: Tue Aug 12, 2003 8:48 am Subject: Re: [SY] to Glassheen |
|
Wasn't aware of the 5 rule ... Go ahead and check ... you can also ask Chris Marlow, Farnaz, Catherine, Jon abbott, Tobias and Chrissy, Jake, Jeremy, David, Matthew, Steve Blower, Ebon and who ever else - if you are really that attached to the whole thing. I make an appearance to the Saturday evening meetings every now and again - so feel free any of you in the UK to come along, maybe we could meet.
|
[Note: We did check with some of the names he mentioned. No-one could vouch for him.]
------------------------------------------------------------------
Making his move to rescue his reputation:
|
| From: Date: Tue Aug 12, 2003 10:23 am Subject: Re: [SY] to trikky "Flirting" |
|
SDM - even though we dissagree about Shri Mataji, I see you have a sense of humor. Not only that but you seem less rigid in your view point -
|
--------------------------------------------
Making his move to launch his attack on those who exposed him:
|
| From: Date: Tue Aug 12, 2003 4:32 pm Subject: |
| Sattwa and Ivan - you 2 really need a good telling off from with Sahaja Yoga... You are both very poor examples to those who read these messages as to how Sahaja Yogis behave. I may print these out to show Derek... |
[Note: Derek is still waiting for those "printouts" he threatened to send. But already knows who he really is now.]
----------------------------------------------------------------------
After inventing another character called "pied piper" and being further exposed by Ivan:
|
| From: Date: Tue Aug 12, 2003 10:38 pm Subject: Re: [SY] Another faceless phoney |
|
|
How is this helping your ascent?
[email protected] wrote:
|
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
In answer to PT who tried to clarify, he carries on name dropping to try and avoid his exposure:
|
| From: Date: Tue Aug 12, 2003 10:44 pm Subject: Re: [SY] Another faceless phoney |
|
Ask Tony about me ... the first English Sahaja yogi.
Is the point weather you have herd of me? no... that is of no significance. Do you know Pranava? Ask him about me by all means.
[email protected] wrote:
|
[Note: We checked with T and P mentioned in this message. Neither can vouch for him.]
------------------------------------------------
Demonstrating his continuing Madness:
|
| From: Date: Tue Aug 12, 2003 10:53 pm Subject: |
| I believe that something great is manifesting here. I feel it has something to do with Lord Jesus Christ... Can you forgive me that you havent heard of me before? Can you guys even forgive the form of my name? Can you forgive me that I dont hate SDM? Can you forgive me that I love Shri Mataji? And can you forgive me that I am my own master and my will manifests through my void and is fed by Lord Vishnu - who I am completely surrendered to? |
[Note: "Lord Vishnu - who I am completely surrendered to?"
Lord Vishnu - who he once believed he was. (and possibly still does)]
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Delicately and discretely supporting himself:
|
| From: Date: Wed Aug 13, 2003 9:30 pm Subject: Re: [SY] Re: Introduction |
|
SDM <[email protected]> wrote:
|
--------------------------------------------------------
Preaching to Dom and claiming to have no intent:
|
| From: Date: Wed Aug 13, 2003 9:55 pm Subject: Re: [SY] Re: Introduction |
|
|
Hi peoples - For me,It is more relevant to focus on now... I joined a week ago and have no concern for what has been written or for anyones intent to take the focus on to this or that topic. It constricts the now, and that means the spontanious has no room to leap in its youthful way -
I am... that is enough... I meditate upon the living revelation of Shri Mataji that has awakened as my Kundalini.
I have no expectations of these people on here and no intent of my own.
|
------------------------------------------------------
Biblically preaching like in his St Joseph days, and redefining what Shri Mataji and Jesus Christ have said about those who are against the Holy Spirit, which continued for many messages:
|
| From: Date: Wed Aug 13, 2003 11:22 pm Subject: Re: [SY] Re: Introduction |
|
|
Our Father, who art in heaven, Aum be thy name...
...may thy will come upon earth as it is in heaven.
please forgive those who have trespassed against us - and please help us to forgive those who have trespassed against us as we hope they will forgive us.
Please lead away from hate - and deliver us into your kingdom of light where hatred is not permitted by you.
The Lamb was sluaghtered before he really lived out his Ramhood... please come again in you form of the great white Ram of heaven that was apposed by the goat - for it is you Lord Jesus that forgives everything. There is nothing that you cannot forgive because that would imply that the thing was more powerfull than your forgiveness... but that is not so.
It easy to see you Lord - and hard for those who don't know you to even have vision - you are the light of this world and are the son of Mary - that is Shri Mataji.
O Mahalaxmi - you have Jesus as the light in your eyes... the forgiveness comes from you - forgive all of us on this forum unconditionally - and free us from enslaving our own minds through the conviction of each individual one of us thinking that we are correct - for it is clearly the undoing of us all on this globe.
Amen.
|
------------------------------------------------------------
Spamming the list, i.e; replying to himself:
|
| From: Date: Thu Aug 14, 2003 7:57 pm Subject: Re: [SY] Ivan the terrible |
|
Ivan, why don't you print out all of those biblical quotes and all the refferences to past posts and hold the pages in your hand waking your forehead?
This won't help your Agnya open up I'm affraid, but it sure will provide enjoyment for me. This way, through my laughter, I will please Shri Krishna - thus oppening my Vishhudhi chakra to bath in a flow of ether.
Daniel Glasheen <[email protected]> wrote:
|
----------------------------------------------------
Denying his competitiveness and still claiming to know the real nature of Christ:
|
| From: Date: Thu Aug 14, 2003 11:24 pm Subject: Re: [SY] Glasseen is out of SYoga |
|
I think that your main miss-calculation with me is that you think I'm trying to win... and you thrive on competitiveness. I am not this way - I just let things desolve in my Agnya without pushing ahead but equally not allowing pushing upon me. You are experiencing what occurs when you try to push on the Agnya...
Do you know the nature of the Lamb?
|
--------------------------------------------------
Supporting Judith Fox, who Shri Mataji says is a bhoot:
|
| From: Date: Tue Aug 19, 2003 12:57 am Subject: Re: [SY] the difference is the Last Judgment |
| And yours is your right... We should really focus on ourselves clearing out our own - but your catch echoes VERY Loadly - and is so obvious to see - Im sure you will repley with your usual hate - but again, I forgive you in advance... |
---------------------------------
Slyly supporting Judith Fox again:
|
| From: Date: Tue Aug 19, 2003 1:05 am Subject: Re: [SY] the difference is the Last Judgment |
|
|
> > I genuinely do appreciate what you say, (and promise i'm not being sarcastic), > but the facts still remain, Judith, and the archives prove, that as > Sattwa said it was _SYogis_ in here who changed the policy on abuse, > and not yourself. Why identify with YOU doing??? none of us have done anything, we are the vehicles... I could easily acuse you of something here - but I will hold back. This is not because of a guilt issue - it is because I have no desire to be caught up in your acusation maya. You may as well enjoy it as I see no way out for you from where I stand, even though it is a sad thing to occur. |
---------------------------------------------
Answering himself and covering for his own contradictions:
|
| From: Date: Tue Aug 19, 2003 1:25 am Subject: Re: SDM is a disgrace - to Eltee |
|
|
something in Ivan? Well, I feel very deeply that Ivan is creating a very bad impression as a representative of Sahaja Yoga. His posts are full of the behavior that contradicts alot that Shri Mataji has said. I don't hate the guy - infact I pray that Lord Jesus alows him to forgive so that he can see properly... Hmm. Ponderance ponderance... It is not my battle - it is his. I surrender.......................................................... |
------------------------------------------------
First acceptance of the challenge put to him:
|
| From: Date: Wed Aug 20, 2003 12:34 am Subject: [SY] Re: SDM is a disgrace - my offer |
| That sounds fine - I have no objection - if you are that focusses on proof I will give you what you want... |
-----------------------------------------------
Correcting Dr Balwinder:
|
| From: Date: Thu Aug 21, 2003 11:29 pm Subject: Re: What I think of what anti-SY think of this list |
| Intelectual discussion is all very well but to be bound the fragemnts of intellect is a curse... The allowance of emotion must be permitted - even if that emotion is something that your form of intellect refuses... I had a choice when joining this about 2 weeks back - either I could accept everything the pro Shri Mataji people said and talk against those Anti-Shri Mataji... Or I could retain the still breath of thoughtlessness in my brain and witness with no binding to mental clasifications that hold us in fragmented intellect. I chose to stay with the thoughtless plane. Nice to meet you - I dont believe we have chatted yet, myname is Daniel... I am a Sahaja Yogi living in London. The title "What I think of what anti-SY think of this list" is a great example of how we get bound to our own intellect and how it twists around as we press on it... you can see that in this example - the thinker of the title was pressing in a way that there fragment of intellect twisted round 3 times. |
--------------------------------------
Still Preaching, and just an example of many similar posts:
|
| From: Date: Fri Aug 22, 2003 8:01 pm Subject: [SY] Re: Miguel too practices nonviolence ... |
| But not many are at peace in this forum. They are not at peace with themselves... for many, peace is still a concept. |
--------------------------------------------
Another of his many preaching examples to the anti's:
|
| From: Date: Fri Aug 22, 2003 8:13 pm Subject: Re: To all ex-members of the out-of-date cult Sahaja Yoga |
| Thank you for your compassion towards me, however the tide is coming in from Neptune and we are about to see exactly who are Sahaja Yogis and who are not. Stand firm in the foundation of your own void and dont have any room in your for the insulters. They insult because there is an emptiness within them. |
--------------------------------------------------
Lying again about being a Sahaja Yogi:
|
| From: Date: Fri Aug 22, 2003 8:19 pm Subject: Re: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Ex-membersofSahajaYoga/ |
|
|
Yoga, I am a member, if that is the right way of calling it because there is no membership... My awareness has been enlightened through the awakening of my Kundalini. this combination of the 2 has ascended to the root of my spirit which is at the crown of my head. That is a Sahaja Yogi - the attention stays on top of the head with ones own spirit. It doesnt slip down to get lost in the traps of trying to prove people and so on ... But your awareness back ontop of your head - that is it. Where your the crown that was given you - and dont let it fall off due to others flubbering about in there own ignorance. Stay cool... nice to meet you, Daniel. |
------------------------------------------------
Preaching to Henriques:
|
| From: Date: Fri Aug 22, 2003 8:33 pm Subject: Re: Who's affraid of thinking? |
> intellect is declared to be an ennemy of enlightenment, all manners of war against that profoiundly useful tool are waged. An enlightened intellect is not an enemy of enlightenment. Intellect is Buddhi. Either He is in a person or he is not, thank God for the angel Gabriel. If a man it such a way that Gabriel is unwelcome, then yes, Intellect is an enemy to the man. > Intellect and Ego are the big ennemies of SY. Incorrect. Attachment to them is not a good thing, but intellect is a quality. Curiously enough the people > that spend all their time stalking ego in others have a mammoth ego, and > funnily enough are unaware of the load they're carrying, though it stinks. That is because stalking requires effort or trying. Even Gabriel doesn't claim his actions as his... he admits openely that he is the vehicle. > > Have you read Metamodern Era, a book writeen by Mataji? Have a look at it, > if you have'nt. And tell me what you think about it. Yep, read it about 3 years back, nice read... > Best, > > Miguel Don't be affraid to think, that is a blokage. just aply dettachment from thought and dettachment in the conviction of your own thoughts being unquestionably right... I could be wrong of course! Having your Kundalini raised means you can effortlessly dettach from thought. There is no trying, trying incorporates the right-side, then strain arises. Rather than try - allow. |
----------------------------------------------
Still trying to be a Guru, like in his Madness days:
|
| From: Date: Fri Aug 22, 2003 8:45 pm Subject: Re: Who's affraid of thinking? |
| If you stick with the essence of Sahaja Yoga, as Shri Mataji advises, you then bypass all this nonsense ... What does this really mean??? Touch the feet of the subtlest - that is Tao, stay with it as it blows the wind. The wind is blowing... in the same way the eyes blink, but not because we forced the blinking. There was no effort involved. That is Buddhi, that is intellect, that is thinking but I don't claim the thought. The thought was mine, I am not mad, but still I do not claim it. Hope your well, friend. |
-----------------------------------------------
Preaching to Chatticatti:
|
| From: Date: Fri Aug 22, 2003 10:56 pm Subject: Re: Who's affraid of thinking? |
|
|
wrote: > Hi Daniel - I find what you have written in your past few posts very > interesting. It is particularly interesting to me because much of > what you have written is the premise of the New Age movement > am is followed by many - most who know nothing about SY. > > The concept that our true essence is spirit and that we are > having an experience on this plane as human BEings is true for > me. I am a work in progress, mind you, so often slip back into > that "attached" way of thinking. The difference now though, is > awareness - a waking up, albeit slowly. (never have been a > morning person :-)) > > So - since you and I think quite alike, I'm curious how Shri Mataji > fits into this picture for you. And can my kundalini be awakened For me, Shri Mataji created Sahaja Yoga, where you can go along for free to experience the awakening of your Kundalini. That is touching the essense. The Kundalini is the subtlest for the Tao and Kundalini are 2 words for the same thing. I feel the Kundalini from the top of my head as well as from the palms of my hands. Shri Mataji's symbolism for me is, well 1st of all she founded Sahaja Yoga and is going around amoungst people giving tlks and raising our Kundalinis. Great, thanks Shri Mataji. I met her a few times, and once gave her an oil painting I did. She has given to me so I felt great giving to her. I am also a poet and wrote 108 peoms in reference to the 108 names of Lord Shiva (One of the deities). I integrated with many other ordinary people in London who had had the same experience. It is a great feeling at a Sahaja Yoga meeting. There is also a huge knowledge side to it all - but I had to be carefull not to get lost in reading instead of sustaining my meditation. Through our meditation we connect to our Kundalinis. I remember about 2 years ago doing a small demonstration to a group of friends. One of my friends, Ben turned to me with his hands held out saying 'When you put your palms towards the photograph of Shri Mataji you feel the coolness in the palms more'. This is something I have found also. I feel confident and openly say that I believe that Shri Mataji is infact the Kundalini. I know nothing about any pro or anti arguments about Sahaja Yoga, and have little interest in them as for me the point is to keep my attention on the Kundalini. Hope that helps. > I don't follow her path? And do I need to care if my kundalini is > active if I "allow"? The allowing is how she awakens. Often we can be restricted around certain chakras. When trying, our swadisthan chakra closes and tention spreads from this spot. this over stimulates the right-side. That is what I have found anyway. Also I learned a great lesson from my bro Pranava, not to start going on about a point like that unless I have actually gone through that experience - I can verify it fir myself... rather than just repeating what others say around me. > Namaste, > > Cat > All the best, Daniel. |
-------------------------------------------------------
Preaching to Emeltee:
|
| From: Date: Fri Aug 22, 2003 11:10 pm Subject: Re: Who's affraid of thinking? |
|
|
for or against - or, is it this way, or that way... Where is the segmentation in between a Sahaja Yogi and Shri Kundalini? ...there isn't one... |
---------------------------------------------------
Trying to deflect Furat's exposure of his fraudulence, and divide Sahaja Yogis against each other like he did in his Madness days:
|
| From: Date: Sun Aug 24, 2003 12:39 am Subject: Re: glasheen |
|
|
I don't have much hope for Ivan, although I can forgive his blindness. For you Furat I sense that you are perhaps joined to this odd non Yogi way of behaving as a kind of trend. I have hope for you. Daniel. |
---------------------------------------------
Preaching to a Carl:
|
| From: Date: Mon Aug 25, 2003 8:44 pm Subject: Re: sahaja yoga cult fading and fading |
|
|
> > Agree miguel sahaja yoga cult fading,the general public don't like > cults preferring the fredom to do there own thing. > sahaja yoga cult mis mash between waco and rajnesshism and infested > with rules,power hungrey leaders and hierarchy,control systems. > After mataji moved on the leaders try salvage what they can power > and money wise. > There be other gurus there always is. > > carl For me, Sahaja Yoga is like this... I went along, got my Kundalini raised and have the ability to be my own Guru. This is given in the 1st meeting you go to. The choice is yours to continue to follow the path you travel with this great new gift, your self-realisation and grounding in your own mastery. From here you have no obligation to attend meetings, give money, join a membership. This totally rules out the possibility that Sahaja Yoga is a cult. For me it is not and never could be through my connection to it. Where is the membership, money and possesions given, forced behavior, church etc...? Of course it is there for cultish people too - I am not one of them - they will hold it up in ignorance thinking they portrait a good image of Sahaja Yoga when they confirm peoples doubts in it by not being rooted in there own Guruship strongly enough - they appear a little hipocritical and it is easy for people to think bad of Sahaja Yoga. Sahaja Yoga is all about your own experiance with the Kundalini, we should stick with that. I am in the subtlety of the Kundalini that attaches to nothing and is fully self suficient. anything away from this center is not Sahaja Yoga and I would say that you dont or never have known what Sahaja Yoga really is if you havent yet grasped this point. Why be attached to the gross manifestation of what conceptualises about it rather than feeling its gentleness, or her gentleness... All the best, Daniel. |
------------------------------------------
A glimpse of his previous Madness: [he believed he was Lord Rama, possibly still does]
|
| From: Date: Mon Aug 25, 2003 9:00 pm Subject: Re: glasheen |
|
|
> (have you met the chief priestess Nutmeg yet, BTW?) No, but I'm not concerned about priestessess. I am beyond thier scope, and I am not concerned either by any witches or any woman at all who may attempt to hold me in ignorance. There is no room for worry, doubt or fear in this heart where Lord Rama lives... And may there be no room in your right heart for these forces either. Feel the breath of this confident air in your chest. |
---------------------------------------------------
Correcting Henriques, but really covering his tracks some more to avoid detection:
|
| From: Date: Wed Aug 27, 2003 11:24 pm Subject: Re: Fwd: [SY] more shaktipat |
|
|
cloud over my view of you. At 1st you seemd a nice open guy discussing his beliefs - but it seems that you have a bee in your bonet about Sahaja Yoga - What for? It is a great unfolding of consciousness. What ever your view, slagging of a path to truth will never take you to truth. If the path is not for you then you simply leave the path... that is enough. The same goes for all of you... what do you expect from this useless effort. If you dont like the path of Sahaj, leave it and go about your business. I don't like football very much but it doesn't mean Im going to plough my energy into telling the world that this is so - what a distraction from where my feet are. |
------------------------------------------------------------
Correcting Lyndale, but again really covering his tracks very carefully:
|
| From: Date: Wed Aug 27, 2003 11:31 pm Subject: Re: To the Holy Prophet Furat |
|
|
She has given to me a free gift that I enjoy whenever. She has never asked for anything in return and I truely believe she has enjoyment in that giving. |
--------------------------------------------
Another hint of his megalomania, claiming to know Christ better than other Sahaja Yogis, and again covering his tracks:
|
| From: Date: Wed Aug 27, 2003 11:35 pm Subject: [SY] Re: glasheen |
|
|
stands there. my consciousness manifests through the heart as wind, I hope that helps. Also Ivan I do so love to be wrong, perhaps I am about you. |
------------------------------------------------
Trying to hide his own homosexuality in answer to a question posed for him, and his view of it and avoiding what he knows Shri Mataji says about it:
|
| From: Date: Wed Aug 27, 2003 11:45 pm Subject: An Answer for Ivan |
|
|
comes from Nirmala. I am not pure and I will curse no one else who is not pure. I do not agree with homosexual conduct and feel quite uncomfortable with it. However I have met some great people who are homosexual. My next door neighbours are homosexual and me and my fiancee find them 2 of the most friendly out of our little Road in London by the park. It's a nice park, William Blake had visions in it when he lived near here in Camberwell. There is a painting on a house - coppied from Blake of his vision - it is of angels faces in the tree of life. The background is the park with its little stream going underneath and a little bridge. Now here is the story. Thats where I 1st had the great pleasure of bumping into Ebon who introduced me to my 11st Sahaja Yoga meeting in Balham. Another funny thing is that my Fathers name 'Glasheen' means littel stream, and my mothers name 'Poncelet' means little bridge. So many things at that moment in my life pointed to Sahaja Yoga. I was already a fan of Blakes and enjoyed that linking very much. Come over one day and I'll show you around this little New Jerusalem. If you have Shri Mataji's love in your heart then you are welcome in my house. Daniel. |
--------------------------------------------------------------
Repeating his Lord Rama megalomania Madness again, and supporting Judith Fox:
|
| From: Date: Wed Aug 27, 2003 11:56 pm Subject: Re: [SY] marzi spills the beans > Whatever happens anyway, no new moderator could be much worse than Judith > Iscariot. > > Hope this helps, > > Sat So easy does the tongue cover in spite, vomited out of a judgefull mind. Jude your diplomatic as far as I can see and my confidence will remain holding you up in my chest beyond what words are mumbled. That is Lord Rama in me... and no one can move him from this seat. |
----------------------------------------------------------------
Letting his phoney "detached" guard down when Sattwa praised others for being the only genuine Scholars on the forum, a title he desperately needs to cherish for himself:
|
| From: Date: Thu Aug 28, 2003 8:22 pm Subject: Re: OT: The curse of the infidel |
| --- In [email protected], <sattwa@h...> wrote: > What is clear from these recent posts from Jagbir and Furat is that the > only genuine scholars we have on this forum are these fine SY brothers. > We see what happens when a corrupt and biased moderator steps aside, > and this list is allowed some intelligent and masterly posts like these. Sattwa, you give a perfect example of being bias in your 1st parragraph and then go on to complain about corrupt and biased moderators????????????????????????????????????????????????????? I think your one of those types who should really not say anything at all as each thing just makes it worse for yourself. I don't think that you represent Sahaja Yoga well on this forum at all. Do your self a favour mate! You sound like some old codger in a gentlemans club bigging up his comrades as he slaps them on the back, feeling pleased with his apparent wit. |
---------------------------------------------------------
Desperately trying to deflect the promotion of a very fair Sahaja Yogi, Dr Balwinder, for the new moderator's job:
|
| From: Date: Thu Aug 28, 2003 8:31 pm Subject: Re: Dr Balwinder for new moderator |
| --- In [email protected], <sattwa@h...> wrote: > At the moment this forum remains a little in limbo, but there is a sense > of calm and members seem to be respecting the general rules against spamming, > abuse, etc, which is very pleasant to observe. > > But with members like Nutmeg/Kaiya, Lyndale, and SDM around we should This is bias also because you suggest that your little crowd of chumies are not abusive towards others, which is not true... > expect this will not last and could be the calm before the storm. > > I would therefore like to propose we find a new moderator as soon as > we can. > > There is clearly one candidate for the job who is head and shoulders > above the rest. No one is head and shoulders above the rest... we are all equal. Being above the rest suggests placing one higher, thus creating an imbalance. I'm glad your not suggesting yourself as your scales are clearly squew wiff... > We all know that is Dr Balwinder, who has the utmost respect from both > sides, and has always been calm and collected and focused on the moderating > contradictions in this place. |
-------------------------------------------------------------
Deviously trying to undermine the good work of Sahaja Yogis who have exposed him and his new Cult:
|
| From: Date: Thu Aug 28, 2003 8:39 pm Subject: Re: Infidels now and then (Hi Nartzi). |
|
|
that go on a mission to curse the disbelievers. Give up your mission and return to the source. A disbieliver lacks in the heart, but the believer who ignites a flame of hate towards those who disbelieve instead of loving them anyway is just a few steps away from absolute ignorance. |
----------------------------------------------------------------
Trying to deflect his imminent exposure:
|
| From: Date: Fri Aug 29, 2003 8:22 pm Subject: Re: Dr Balwinder for new moderator |
| O dear Ivan, I think you're possessed. |
------------------------------------------------------
Desperately covering for himself, but still revealing his ignorance and megalomania:
|
| From: Date: Fri Aug 29, 2003 8:27 pm Subject: Re: To Daniel |
| I disagree, Shri Mataji is a great Guru, she just has some no good followers. But I have met some real gems. Shri Mataji is Aquarius... there are only 12 incarnations that I will even listen too - snobbish perhaps, but Shri Mataji is one of them. Nice chatting anyway, and hello to you too. |
----------------------------------------------
Undermining Dr Balwinder for moderator, the only Sahaja Yogi candidate for the job:
|
| From: Date: Fri Aug 29, 2003 8:32 pm Subject: Re: [SY] Dr Balwinder for new moderator |
|
|
thats 2 |
-------------------------------------------------
A second confirmation of his willingness to test a proof that he is not a real Sahaja Yogi:
|
| From: Date: Fri Aug 29, 2003 8:57 pm Subject: Re: To Mr Daniel Glassheen and Dr Balwinder |
|
|
Just incase you dont have them - my email is daniel_glasheen@h... |
---------------------------------------------
Holy Grail claims of his past coming out through his sarcasm:
|
| From: Date: Fri Aug 29, 2003 9:01 pm Subject: Re: [SY] To Mr Daniel Glassheen and Dr Balwinder |
| Hey - Ivan - I have a good one for you... "I am King Arthur" |
------------------------------------------------
Pretending he is not being extremely damaged emotionally by the continuing exposures:
|
| From: Date: Fri Aug 29, 2003 9:10 pm Subject: Seeking. |
| I don't seek proof, or acceptance, or even knowledge. All I seek now is to be the awareness that I am, and to know what part of the great Virata I represent... that is enough for me. Im really just bending the ends of your centances so that they dont peirce me. |
-------------------------------------------------------
Losing his phoney "detachment" again under the growing possibility of his imminent exposure":
|
| From: Date: Sun Aug 31, 2003 11:53 am Subject: [SY] Re: To Daniel |
| Yes she is - these words came from her mouth - I guess it proves your a complete idiot - Well done on confirming that so well in the eyes of those who read your posts... I guess you missed that talk by Shri Mataji, too busy being online trying to convince the world and yourself that you are worth while listening too that you missed that one. Yes Shri Mataji is Aquarius, Aquarius is the Kundalini and this is the age of Aquarius... ask a Yogi that knows more than you... it shouldnt be too hard mate! You seem like one of those types that preeches blindly what they are told and who is blind to anyone elses version of there truth through them selves. Believe me, Shri Mataji is laughing at your mass of ignorance, I dont care what any of you guys say... IVAN IS THE WORST EXAMPLE OF A SAHAJA YOGI THAT I HAVE EVER WITNESSED, AND LISTENING TO HIM AMUSSES ME SO MUCH AS HE TRIPS HIMSELF UP AGAIN AND AGAIN. What last days, are you the judge to send me this way or that? ... no you are nothing to me, but again I can forgive you... and it is that that makes me a Yogi and you not. |
---------------------------------------------------------
Voting for Lyndale as the new moderator, who was banned for her obscenities and insults at the Shri Adi Shakti forum, and who cursed Sahaja Yogis to "rot in hell" and who said she would dedicate herself to exposing Sahaja Yoga starting several forums against Sahaja Yoga:
|
| From: Date: Sun Aug 31, 2003 12:28 pm Subject: Re: Vote for who you would like to have as a new moderator |
| Ok - you get my vote --- In [email protected], "lyndale108" <lyndale108@y...> wrote: > Dear All, > > I would love to have the role as moderator. |
Repeating his Lord Rama megalomania Madness again and again:
|
| From: Date: Fri Sep 12, 2003 10:29 pm Subject: Re: If you get down and you quarell every day now, your saying prayers to the devil |
| Will do - I'm not too bother if you are chucked out - I hope Shri Mataji forgives you... Put Ill show Derek tomorrow - and at least you'll know I'm a real Yogi and a real human and will then have the dignity to call me Mr. Glasheen if you can manage that rather than your disrespectfull invetories and projected catches - Got it Mr singh - If you can't express decency what hope do you have - Lord Rama is far away from the indecent. And indecent to me is basically how you have responded to me in the 3 weeks Ive been here. As a Sahaja Yogi I am deeply shocked at how you welcome people to the site with paranoid dillusion and continue to project your inner demons on us in order for you to conquer them... It doesn't work that way mate - I would like to call you my brother but you have offended what a brother stands for in the right heart and your whole group have done this - As a witness of this site I say this very clearly and shall pass on what I have witnessed in you. You dishonour Lord Rama in your actions and conduct on this site and will now realise it. |
|
| From: Date: Mon Sep 15, 2003 6:53 am Subject: Re: Being the light of pure compassion. This is the main difference between Lord Rama and Ravana |
|
| From: Date: Mon Sep 15, 2003 7:18 am Subject: The central channel |
| If anyone wants to find me, I'll be in the Sahaja Yoga collective... Like the green comfort that comes from the Earth being, straight through the centre. She supports all the flowers and holds up the trees. As I sit on the floor I feel it wrap around me and the light in my right heart flickers like a laughing... Ahh, Sita has returned, what joy! |
And much more of the same Lord Rama megalomania:
|
| From: Date: Fri Sep 19, 2003 10:43 am Subject: Awaken Lord Rama |
| If you want to know how to awaken Lord Rama - then sit quitely with your attention on your right heart. sit for a while... Then ask the mother inside you to awaken Lord Rama so that the fire of rage, like Ravana, can be forever put out. Mean it ... and say it from your heart. --- In [email protected], "cool_little_stream" <daniel_glasheen@h...> wrote: > > > > You focus so much energy on the non-yogis. drop it, let go, release > > your grip on proving one way or the other. this way the tention in > > your right-side drops out and more vibrations will flow upwards to > > enhance your Sahasra. > > > Awaken Lord Rama within your heart... He will put out the fire of > rage and replace that with a soft flickering light. Then through the > sweetness of your compassion your words will smile like a little > child who has just had a spoonful of Honey. > > This message is to all. |
Continuing to rant on about Lord Rama, whom he believed himself to be during his Madness in SYoga:
|
| From: Date: Fri Sep 19, 2003 10:47 am Subject: No more Ravana |
| Ravana is this rage. Have no room within you for him. Lord Rama is like the soft breath within your chest that pleases every cell of the lungs, popping them open, awake and relaxed. Like smoke and fire rage creaps in. When we are enraged with each other on this forum it is Ravana seeping into us. |
***************************************************
Here is the hard evidence attained by Sattwa who put in an abuse report to the ISP who is the provider of "Daniel Glasheen's" main IP address number; 62.253.64.9:

This is a print screen image directly from Sattwa's email account and cannot possibly be a forgery.
Anyone can check this with the ISP who replied above to Sattwa.
So here is the proof: SDM posts from the IP address 62.253.64.9.
Here is "Daniel Glasheen's" most common IP address:
Check:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/sahaj-yoga/message/15287?source=1
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/sahaj-yoga/message/15222?source=1
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/sahaj-yoga/message/15219?source=1
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/sahaj-yoga/message/15188?source=1
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/sahaj-yoga/message/15187?source=1
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/sahaj-yoga/message/15185?source=1
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/sahaj-yoga/message/15183?source=1
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/sahaj-yoga/message/15182?source=1
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/sahaj-yoga/message/15103?source=1
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/sahaj-yoga/message/15102?source=1
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/sahaj-yoga/message/15101?source=1
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/sahaj-yoga/message/15093?source=1
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/sahaj-yoga/message/14948?source=1
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/sahaj-yoga/message/14945?source=1
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/sahaj-yoga/message/14944?source=1
And many, many more!
SDM is BUSTED!
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------