|
(1) Edelbaum,T - Lermen,H [A03]
CT Ch., 1957
This game came to me over the internet. The winner now lives in Florida and is very active with the USCF. This is his most memorable game from the old days in Connecticut. 1.f4
d5
2.Nf3
Bf5
This bishop ends up a bit misplaced on f5, especially with the fianchetto formation Black chooses. RB 3.e3
A Leningrad formation (d3, g3) would better take advantage of the Bf5 by promoting the e4 break. RB 3...Nf6
4.Be2
g6
5.0-0
Bg7
6.Ne5
0-0
7.g4
Bd7!?
8.Qe1
Nc6
9.Nxc6
Bxc6
10.d3
e6
11.Nd2
Qe7
12.Qh4
d4
Also to be considered would be 12...Qc5 HL 13.e4
[ 13.exd4
Nd5
( 13...Nxg4
14.Qxe7
Bxd4+
15.Rf2
) 14.Qf2
( 14.Qxe7
Bxd4+
) ] 13...Nd5
14.g5?!
Also to be considered is trading queens first with 14.Qxe7 Nxe7. Now Black gets a strong post on e3.HL 14...Ne3!
15.Rf3
f5
! Black sets up an effective and necessary 2nd rank defense to White&aposs ambitions on the h-file. RB 16.Rh3
Bh8
17.b3
Nxc2
18.Rb1
Rf7
19.Bb2
White tosses in a second pawn rather than give up his counterplay with 19.e5. RB 19...fxe4
20.dxe4
Raf8
21.Rf3
In retrospect 21.f5!? looks a bit better, but Black is still strong. HL [ 21.f5!?
gxf5
( 21...exf5??
22.Bc4
) 22.exf5
Rxf5
23.Bd3
Ne3
-+ RB] 21...Qd6
22.Nc4
Rxf4!
23.Nxd6
Rxh4
Black now has a clear winning advantage. White could not be criticized for resigning now, but there is just enough tension in the position for a strong player like Edelbaum to see what "technical difficulties" might arise. Technical difficulties is the term masters use for what Patzers call "cheapo potential." The result is a high class endgame full of instructional fencing and jabbing as White tries in vain to hold a lost endgame. HL 24.Rxf8+
Kxf8
25.Rf1+
Kg8
26.Bc4
Rg4+!
This move was the key to Black&aposs defense. RB 27.Kh1
Bxe4+
28.Nxe4
Rxe4
29.Bd3
Re1
And now Black has forced the ending referred to above. White plays on down 3 pawns because of a rather effective White squared blockade and the hope for bishops of the opposite colors. RB 30.Kg1
Rxf1+
31.Kxf1
Ne3+
32.Ke1
c5
33.Bc1
Nd5
I like the plan ...Nf5-d6, contesting e4 and c4 to break the white squared blockade. RB [ 33...Nf5
] 34.Bc4
Kf7
35.Kf2
Be5
36.h4
Ke7
37.Kf3
Kd6
38.Bd3
Nb4
39.Bb1
b5
40.Bd2
Nd5
41.Bd3
Nc3?!
This just gives White a reason to play on, since he is able to double blacks pawns and get bishops of opposite colors. Much more disheartening would be 41...Kc6, followed by ...Nb6 and ...c4. RB 42.Bxc3
dxc3
43.h5
gxh5
44.Bxh7
Kd5
45.Bc2
Kd4
46.Ke2
Bg7
[ 46...h4
] 47.Bg6
h4
48.Bh5
a5
49.Be8
b4
50.Bf7
e5
[ 50...h3
51.Bh5
c2
52.Kd2
c1Q+
53.Kxc1
Ke3
also wins. HL] 51.Be6
e4
52.Bg4
Be5
53.g6
e3
54.Kd1
c4!?
55.Bd7
cxb3
Also winning is... [ 55...a4
56.bxa4
( 56.Bxa4
Kd3
) 56...c2+
( 56...b3
) 57.Kxc2
b3+
58.axb3
cxb3+
59.Kd1
b2
60.Bf5
h3
61.Ke2
h2
White cannot cover everything. HL] 56.axb3
Ke4
57.Be6
[ 57.g7
hangs on longer. HL] 57...Kf3
58.Bc4
c2+
0-1
|