Legal Documents:

The actual complaints are double spaced, and indentations are not exact copies of the original document. Stressline cannot  guarantee the exact accuracy of the rendering of every word of each of these documents. We believe they are close to 99.99% accurate.

1. 9/27/01

A.D. DeMarco Enterprises Inc. v. Ocean Spray et al

DeMarco v Ocean Spray et al  on one page for high speed connections and printing

Part 1: The Nature of the Action and Factual Background (1-44)

Part 2: Ocean Spray's Decline; Coop Marketing Agreement, Involuntary Share Redemption; Merger/Sale Prospects and O.S. Refusal to Enterain Them (45-89)

Part 3: The 2000 Annual Meeting and The 2001 Annual Meeting (90-122)

Part 4: Ocean Spray's Intransigence and Management Entrenchment (123-147)

Part 5: Counts I - III  (148-177)

Part 6: Counts IV - VII (178-216)

Mr. DeMarco is represented by the law firm of Cozen  & O'Connor (Philadelphia). His lead attorney is H. Robert Fiebach.

2. 1/22/02

DEFENDANTS' OPENING BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF THEIR MOTION TO DISMISS AND TO STRIKE

3. 3/8/02

Brief of Plaintiff (DeMarco) in Opposition to Motion of Defendants ( Ocean Spray et al ) to Strike and Dismiss Complaint

4. 3/18/02

 DEFENDANT'S (Ocean Spray) REPLY BRIEF IN SUPPORT
OF THEIR MOTION TO DISMISS AND TO STRIKE

5. 4/5/02

SUR REPLY BRIEF OF PLAINTIFF IN OPPOSITION TO MOTION OF DEFENDANTS TO DISMISS AND TO STRIKE COMPLAINT

Editorial:

A strange strained convoluted conspiracy theory that trots out a mangled hodgepodge of allegations?

Front Page