This is a reprint of an email I received ever so recently, One I feel should by no means be ignored. it begs the Question.       



Is Obama Eligible to Run for President?

I keep reading these same "facts" and you'd think if they were
  >true, why hasn't someone, i.e., the National Republican Party,
  >mounted a formal challenge in the courts of this country? Sans such
  >judicial support, this is nothing but spin. I'm not a lawyer and
  >perhaps there is a legal precedent that precludes such proof BEFORE
  >the election. If there is, it ought to be changed so as we don't
end
  >up with an elected President that places the entire country in
  >jeopardy while the courts sort things out.
  >
  >  Oh yeah, and while the challenger is at it, perhaps the courts
can
  >be empowered to learn/view Obama's:
  >    College records, including thesis papers
  >
  >    Selective Service Registration
  >
  >    Medical records
  >
  >    Illinois State Senate records
  >
  >    Record of baptism
  >
  >
  >
  >      WHERE'S THE BIRTH CERTIFICATE?
  >
  >
  >      According to Pat Shannan, (assistant editor, American Free
  >Press, July 7,
  >      2008) it now appears that Barack Obama is constitutionally
  >ineligible for
  >      the office of president. John McCain's eligibility was
  >established in 1964,
  >      when courts ruled Sen. Barry Goldwater was eligible although
he
  >was born in
  >      Arizona when it was a territory, not a state. McCain was born
  >in the Panama
  >      Canal Zone when it was a U.S. territory.
  >      And, even as the controlled media continues to ignore the
  >ineligibility of
  >      Obama, it will not go away. While few doubt that the
Democrats
  >will manage
  >      to pull off his nomination, all remain poised to view the
legal
  >performance.
  >
  >      The first hurdle will be having Obama produce his birth
  >certificate, which
  >      so far he has refused to do, and prove that he was born in
  >Hawaii on August
  >      4, 1961, as he has always claimed. There is speculation that
  >his American
  >      mother may have brought him to Honolulu shortly after his
birth
  >in Kenya ,
  >      but no proof of that has been shown.
  >
  >      According to the law on the books at the time of Obama's
birth,
  >the office
  >      of president requires that a candidate be a natural born
  >citizen if the
  >      child was not born to two U.S. citizen parents. Since he was
  >not, should it
  >      be proven that Obama was not born in Hawaii , as claimed, he
is
  >ineligible
  >      without further debate. But assuming that he was born there,
he
  >has another
  >      problem.
  >
  >      According to a legal researcher who has contacted AFP , U.S.
  >law very
  >      clearly states: 'If only one parent is a U.S. citizen at the
  >time of one's
  >      birth, that parent must have resided in the United States
for a
  >minimum of
  >      10 years, five of which must be after the age of 16.' And
  >therein lies
  >      Obama's new problem.
  >
  >      Barack Obama's father was never a U.S. citizen.
Interestingly,
  >there isn't
  >      much paperwork on the marriage of Obama's parents, and this
has
  >a few
  >      researchers speculating that it never took place at all. On
  >page 27 of
  >      Obama: From Promise to Power, David Mendell writes: 'Obama
  >later confessed
  >      that he never searched for the government documents on the
  >marriage,
  >      although Madelyn (Obama's maternal grandmother) insisted they
  >were legally
  >      married.' He also notes that Obama's father apparently was
not
  >legally
  >      divorced from his first wife back in Kenya at the time, a
point
  >of
  >      contention that ultimately led to their separation.
  >
  >      This also would suggest that there may never have been any
  >legal marriage by
  >      Obama's parents at all, but the Constitution does not ban an
  >illegitimate
  >      child from the White House, as long as he was born inside the
  >U.S. Obama's
  >      mother was born in Kansas and was onl y 18 when Obama was
born.
  >This means
  >      even though she satisfies the citizen requirement for 10
years,
  >she was not
  >      a citizen for at least five years prior to Barack Obama's
  >birth.
  >
  >      In essence, the mother alone is not old enough to qualify her
  >son for
  >      automatic U.S. citizenship. At most, two years elapsed from
his
  >mother
  >      turning 16 to the time of Barack Obama's birth when she was
18.
  >His mother
  >      would have needed to have been 16 + 5 = 21 years old at the
  >time of Barack
  >      Obama's birth for him to be a natural-born citizen.
  >      Barack Obama was already three years old at the time his
mother
  >turned 21.
  >
  >      Technically, Obama should have been naturalized as a citizen,
  >but that, of
  >      course, would disqualify him from holding the office of
  >president. If these
  >      allegations are, accurate, America could install in January
of
  >2009 a new
  >      president who is not even a U.S. citizen, neither born nor
  >naturalized.
  >
  >      It should be demanded that Obama produce his 1961 Hawaiian
  >birth
  >      certificate.
  >      If he cannot satisfactorily do so, he should be deemed
  >immediately
  >      ineligible to hold the office of president.

Click Here to return to Captain C.O.O.C's Corner
Hosted by www.Geocities.ws

1