I just so recently received a special edition of the Ekklesia Communicator published by Danny D. Bunn of
Ekklesia Communications out of Boise Idaho.  In it were some e-mails regarding the so recent attack on the
WTC Twin Towers.  I like these e-mails for two reasons, First of all these people still have the good sense
to think for themselves and not let people like Dan Rather, Tom Brokaw or whoever else I may mention do
their thinking for them.  With all due respect friends God gave us all a brain and expects us to use that
brain, secondly they all make good logical scientific sense and that is what we always strive for here at
Sonshine Ministries, the irrefutable truth.  Is what they are saying true?  I am going to resist the temptation
of doing your thinking for you, let you read the e-mails and then judge for yourself, I am only going to
share one or two with you though, if you would like to read them all I encourage you to write
 
Ekklesia Communications
P.O. Box 1214
Nampa Idaho 83653
 
Danny will be more than happy I’m sure to add you to his mailing list.  And now without further ado, the
e-mails.  It goes without saying that out of respect for privacy the addresses will not be published.
 
By David
Ok is it just me, or did anyone else recognize that it wasn’t the airplane impacts that blew up the World Trade Center? To me this
is the most frightening part of the morning. I hope other people actually are catching this, but I haven’t seen anyone say it yet, so
I guess being an engineer may make one more conscious of these things...
 
If you watch the time sequence, you’ll see that it happens like this:
-A plane hits tower #1 a hole in it high up. The expected things then happen:
-The building stays up. A reinforced concrete building is *extremely* strong. Terrorist set off a large bomb *inside* that building
without significant damage. Notice that neither plane impact does anything like break off a big hunk of building floors and send it
crashing into the street. The WTC towers were specifically designed to survive a direct impact from a jumbo jet -which *both
do*.
-The second plane hits the tower, lower and moving faster. It blows a bigger hole through it, showering debris on the street, but
the building is clearly still standing and still looks quite solid.
-The second building begins burning, also from the impact point up.
-Perhaps a half hour later the fire in the first building *goes out*. It is still smoldering and letting off black smoke, but there is  no
flame. Anyone who saw the documentary on that horrid skyscraper fire in Philadelphia that led to the codes requiring sprinklers
on every floor knows why. There’s no way to get fire apparatus into a skyscraper effectively, so it needs to be designed into the
structure-which it is. The water flows from the roof reservoirs down. Sprinklers can kill incredible infernos, and that’s what these
do.
-The fire in the second building goes out.
-Then later, the second building suddenly crumbles into dust, in a smooth wave running from the top of the building (above the
burned part) down through all the stories at an equal speed. The debris falls primarily inward. The tower does not break off intact
and collapse into other buildings. The bottom does not crumble before  the top. The burned out section crumbles also. The
crumbling comes from the top (above the damage). It moves at a uniform rate. All of the structural members are destroyed in a
smooth pattern, so there is no remaining skeleton. The damage is uniform, symmetric, and total.
 
In summary, it looks exactly like a demolition-because that’s what it is.
 
-The first tower collapses in similar demolition wave.
 
There’s no doubt that the planes hit the building and did a lot of damage. But look at the footage-those buildings were
*demolished*. To demolish a building you don’t need all that much explosive but it needs to be placed in the correct places (in
direct contact with the structural members) and ignited in a smooth, timed sequence. Someone had to have had a lot of access to
all of both towers and of lot of time to do this.
 
This is pretty grim. The really dire part is what were the planes for? If you’re going to demolish the building, what’s the point of
flashy display?
 
The way they’re cutting the footage on the news now makes it look like the buildings crumbled soon after being hit by the planes.
which is not true, They’ve also started slowing the clips from after the demolition explosion starts, so you don’t see the top of the
building go first-but those who taped it, go back and look at the early first-run clips.
 
If, in a few days on one official has mentioned anything about the demolition part, I think we have a REALLY serious problem.
 
Anonymous
 
Watching FOX news at the time of the WTC “implosion”, I heard the newscaster on the street even refer to it as an
IMPLOSION. It was obvious! The towers did not explode OUT, but imploded IN and dropped nearly straight down. Also why did
the two towers take so long to drop after the hit from the planes? Also, why was there so much white dust, like a volcanic explosion
would have made? Watching the fire on TV, I wondered why it continued for so long after the towers were down? They said water
was put on the fire and I question...is that what is commonly used to put out jet fuel?
 I admit, I couldn’t watch it all night...but these were my original impressions.
 
Dee
 
KNOW that the building had to be loaded with bombs. Those buildings came down like a Disney production. There will be no
evidence. We have seen this BEFORE!!!
     Flight 11 on Sept 11
    “American” Airlines
     They play games with names and numbers....let’s connect the dots.
 
We would love to hear your thoughts on the WTC Twin Tower bombings. E-mail or write me at [email protected]