Beat CPS!

Here's the legal paperwork to win and beat CPS

See, the problem is you don't know about Real Law.   Here's an example of Real Law.   It made two WA State Supreme Court justices
quit, as in resign, as in stay home and play golf.   Wanna fire a judge?

The following Real Law  process made the CPS hand the kid back like a hot potato.    Just read about it in the following article.  This is the magic bullet everybody's been looking for.

I want to get all these processes and private tribunals into boilerplate legal forms and simple connect the dots instructions so people can easily use them.

I don't want a lot of people bothering this guy for free advice.    His advice is how he makes a living.    He is a legal counselor.   I suggest the people who are willing to pay this guy contact me and we can proceed from there.   I know him, and I've visited in his home and seen the daughter, Rae.   It's for real.

If you got no money, you can help find people to pay for this, and still get the info for free.   You get a credit for what they put into the hat.   I'm estimating 15 to 20 K.   

It's pass the hat.   Then when we have the money and get the process, the people who come in later pay off the earlier people, so it finally winds up everybody paid the same price.

If you think your child is gone for good, don�t be so sure.   The world of Real Law is surprising, and a lot of the things in it, you just wouldn�t believe until you check them out.  

For example, how could you believe that Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas said that everybody in Federal prison was there voluntarily?   Do you think he was making a joke?   Could it also be true that they are held simply because they didn�t pay a bond they didn�t know about?  

Is it possible that anybody could open a $1M credit account with the Dept of Treasury for free, and pay that bond off?  Why are you so sure you can�t get your kid back when you hadn�t even realized that all the �law� books are plainly labeled �code�, �statute�, or �regulation�, and not �Law�?   
Immediate Release: Rae Comes Home to Happy Parents

On Sunday, September 17, 2000, Rae Anne was in the kitchen with her parents who where busy preparing Sunday Dinner. Unfortunately Rae did not hear or understand a warning to move as her father, Marsson, was "coming through" with a hot pot full of boiling water and cooked pasta. Marsson attempted to "push" Rae out of the way with his forearm, but the pot was hot and starting to burn his hands through the potholders and he missed, instead "catching" Rae's cheek with the pot itself. After dumping the hot water a quick inspection showed a slight redness, and ice was applied and dinner was finished and consumed. The next day there was a visible sign of what looked like a healing sunburn, smaller than a quarter, larger than a nickel and Rae went to school and nothing was said or noted.

On Tuesday, September 19, 2000 Rae Anne was removed from the Private School where she was enrolled in Kindergarten when the Principal agreed to turn Rae over to Carolina Caballero, who was d.b.a. a S.O.S.C.F. Caseworker for unsubstantiated suspicions of child abuse. When the Principal was questioned by Marsson and his friend, Roger Olsen, on why the school had broken the contract that Marsson had with the school, she told Marsson and Roger that "State law required me to breach that contract." The Principal could not state what law this was and admitted, upon further questions, that indeed state "law" is subordinate to the Constitution, however, she still insisted that "state law requires me to breach the contract."

On Wednesday a "Shelter Hearing" took place before Referee Connie Isgro. It was obvious that Isgro was going to allow anything that Carolina Caballero, the D.D.A., Rae's court-appointed "Attorney," and the court-appointed "Attorney" for Amanda wanted to say as if it was the "Gospel Truth" and the end of discussion. The one man in the room who knew what was going on and could actually shed some light on the situation, Marsson, was not allowed to speak, was not allowed to challenge or even examine, except for a doctored photograph, any of the "evidence" that was presented against him. No objections where allowed, no controversy was allowed, the only question for Marsson was whether he wanted a court-appointed liar, that's attorney for those of you who do not understand this term, to come in and lie about him

pg 2
Hosted by www.Geocities.ws

1