From " . . a Battle for Hearts, Minds" By Stephanie Simon, Times Staff Writer
July 26, 2006
[ page A12 ; the parts from the article in bold print ]
In upholding bans on same-sex marriage [?] this month . . . : Gays and lesbians do not have a right to wed because their relationships are fundamentally different from straight relationships.Stung by that reasoning, gay and lesbian leaders have set out to convince the public that it's not true.
Comment "x is untrue" can be debated forever — especially if sufficient amounts of irrelevant data be brought in the (already expanding) universe of discourse.Follow a few links found at Google on search for "male body" "female body".
Sexuality and Sexual Health - Female body parts... changes in adolescence, - female body parts, - male body parts ... Sexuality and Sexual Health - Female Body Parts. Women�s Sexual Organs ... www.sexlife.net.au/2_9_5.html - 27k - Cached - Similar pages The History of the Female Reproductive System... the death of the mother suggested that other circumstances might render the male body female. More easily, the female body might become male at puberty, ... www.stanford.edu/class/history13/earlysciencelab/body/femalebodypages/genitalia.html - 15k - Cached - Similar pages Male Body Language, Reading Body Language, Female Body Language ...Body Language, Reading Body Language, Female Body Language, Man Body Language, Body Language Attraction, Woman Body Language, Attraction Body Language, ... www.mydearvalentine.com/body-language/male-body-language.html - 13k - Cached - Similar pages Body Language, Reading Body Language, Female Body Language, Man ...Body Flirting Language � Body Language Lying � Body Language Sign � Female Body Language � Male Body Language � Reading Body Language ... www.mydearvalentine.com/body-language/ - 13k - Cached - Similar pages Female body shape - Wikipedia, the free encyclopediaFemale body shape has a bearing on a wide range of human activities, ... Hourglass figure � Human height � Male body shape � Sexual dimorphism ... en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Female_body_shape - 41k - Cached - Similar pages Hair - Wikipedia, the free encyclopediaThe human female body typically has more vellus hair (making the skin appear bare), while the male body typically has more terminal hair (especially on the ... en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Body_hair - 61k - Cached - Similar pages [PDF] Species Socionomic Sex Ratio (a) Male body mass (kg) (b) Female ...File Format: PDF/Adobe Acrobat - View as HTML Male body. mass (kg) (b). Female body. mass (kg) (b). Body Size. Dimorphism (b). male canine. residuals (c). Activity. period (d). Arboreal/ ... www.eva.mpg.de/primat/staff/charles_nunn/PDFs/WichNunn.pdf - Similar pages
Unfortunately, the few ("top") links I have looked into did not offer any pictures (for those who cannot read). I am confident that some ample likenesses of the male versus female types of body can be found somewhere. Also, one can actually compare the authentic versions, the circumstances permitting.. . . After the recent setbacks, they [the "rights"-leaders] see an urgent need first to convince the court of public opinion � and then, they hope, more and more courts of law � that their families are [FALSE :] just like any other family, their children like any other children, their love just as deserving of official recognition.
"We really have to start at a very basic level," said Joe Solmonese, president of the Human Rights Campaign . . .
Comment I do not see how can anybody honestly argue that a male-male couple or a female-female couple can constitute a family "just like" a family built round a male-female couple.Again, I do not see how can anybody honestly make such arguments.
What does "their children" mean in the case of a same-sex couple ?
It can mean some adopted children (of other parents) ; or it can mean the child of one of the same-sex couple with some other person. It cannot mean a child of a male-male — or a female-female "parents".
What about "their love" ? Does it deserve official recognitions ? What for ? Whose love, in any case, does need official recognition ?
Whom is this misleading language designed to fool ? And to what exactly purpose ?
Working both independently and in coalitions, all the major gay and lesbian groups are cranking up their public education1 campaigns. They're also reaching out to straight activists � liberal clergy, union bosses, and leaders of black, Latino and Asian groups � in search of allies who can help them portray their cause as a broad social-justice movement.
* No. This is a public disinformation coampaign.Please note some connotation with the criminal Marxist tradition of "class-struggle". The "liberal" clergy may mean anything. The "union bosses" has traditionally been the hotbed of the criminal marxist/leninist infiltration orchestrated by the Kremlin, especially in 1930-50's. The black ethnic group, the Latino ethnic group, the Asian ethnic groups has nothing whatever to do with the human sexuality which is entirely general and uniform amongs the various peoples.
Please find "The Communist Conspiracy Against the Negro" by George Samuel Schuyler, for example, on the workings of disinformation campaigns. Whether this issue be necessarily connected with the criminal Marxist organisations is not transparently obvious ; and it may, or may not be so in the several instances of the "righter" activities.
The presumption is that such issues are very convenient for any sort of disinformation masters.
I might continue with the article from Los Angeles Times when I muster some more patience for all this baloney. — (WPT).
[the following from the relevant link at Los Angeles Times ] On Organised Stupefaction of the Masses
Oppose same sex marriage Do you favor a constitutional amendment to ban gay marriage? www.PollingPoint.com
[from within the link : ]In recent years, the question of whether gay couples should be able to get married [?] has received a lot of attention. People feel very strongly on both sides of the issue, and it is becoming a topic that candidates for office cannot avoid discussing. In this short poll, we will ask for your opinions on some of the policy questions surrounding gay marriage.
Your answers will be completely confidential and will be used only for measuring public opinion. We will never try to sell you anything or release your personal information.
Survey Topic:Gay marriage [?]
Survey Length: 5-7 minutesQuestion why should it need a 5-7-minute survey on such an "issue" ?
I would not have made time for examining the survey as to whether it might contain "loaded questions" — such as impose some certain premises on the respondent in a way designed for him / her to accept them unwittingly.
The presumption is, it might contain such "loaded" questions ; else, why 5-7 minutes on such a topic ? (WPT)
A Constitutional Amendment ? No !
Please note : this is an opinion of an individual (me).(This is not a description of some actually existent -- or non-existent -- states of affairs -- where I feel free to assert some events or other to have been, or not to have been the case).
It seems to me that the matter under consideration is not worthy a constitutional Amendment (which I have seem some sources propose).
Should this one have ever become a "serious" matter ? I do not think so.
One might allow that some 0.001 - 0.002 per cent. (just to try some kind of number) of the "activists" are actually honest in their stances. Such persons have probably been misled themselves by some specialists of disinformation<.
I would not claim that this matter is a 'red herring'. I would claim it is highly probable that it can serve for some sorts of 'red herring' in some selected cases.