Related Links & Articles:

Top Ten Reasons to Lower the Voting Age
"Youth pay taxes, live under our laws, they should have the vote"
"Politicians will represent their interests if youth can vote"
"If we let stupid adults vote, why not let smart youth vote?"

Committee for the Study of the American Electorate
(CSAE's President, Curtis Gans is the leading opponent to lowering the voting age, describing it as a 'terminally dumb' idea.)

Teenage voting rights proposed
"Being 14, an awkward, largely uncelebrated time that can seem to last for an eternity rather than a year, took a small step toward relevance in the Capitol on Wednesday. After earnest testimony by teenagers and their youthful supporters, the Senate Elections and Reapportionment Committee passed legislation that would lower the state's legal voting age to 14."

Lower voting age debated
"It sounds counterintuitive: Young adults don’t vote, so lower the voting age. But advocates for a lower voting age say 18 is the worst time to start voting because that’s when teen-agers’ lives are in turmoil — moving away to college, stressing out over graduation, getting a job, joining the armed forces."

Californians consider granting 14-year-olds the right to vote
"On Super Tuesday last month, Robert Reynolds headed for the polls at the local senior center, where he politely requested a ballot from a graying, middle-aged woman. She glanced at his youthful face, and then brusquely turned him away." "Undaunted, Reynolds, a 17-year-old high school junior, then exercised a democratic right -- staging a demonstration with a handful of schoolmates. They chanted slogans and toted signs; one read, 'No Taxation Without Representation.' The group of six then dutifully headed off to class."

Teens tell state senators: Let us vote
"After enduring a grilling from one of the Capitol's more grizzled veterans, teens looking for a voice in the political process walked away with an early victory when the Senate Elections Committee endorsed a plan to give millions of 14-, 15-, 16- and 17-year-old Californians the right to vote."

Bill To Lower Voting Age To 14 Passes Senate Committee
"A bill designed to get youth more involved in the elections process passed the state Senate Committee on Elections and Reappointment on Wednesday. SB 1606 by Sen. John Vasconcellos, D-San Jose, would lower the state's legal voting age to 14. The catch is that it would take four 14 or 15 year olds to make up a whole vote."

"No right is more precious in a free country than that of having a choice in the election of those who make the laws under which…we must live. Other rights, even the most basic, are illusory if the right to vote is undermined." (Wesberry v. Saunders, 376 U.S. 1, 17 (1964).)

If Teens Could Vote
written April 28th, 2004


Recently, Senator John Vasconcellos proposed a bill that, if voted into law by adults, would lower the voting age for state and local elections in California. Technically, the votes of 14-17 year olds would only count as fractions of an adult vote. This has caused an outcry from those who feel that teens are not ready to vote. Numerous articles have attempted to attack the intellect and reasoning capacity of those under the current legal age (see Teens Inferior, Say Superior Adult Experts). On the other side, many teens feel deprived of their civil liberties. So, what would really happen if teens could vote?

 

Some people argue that "kids" (thinking that 15 and 5 are one in the same) would just vote for ice cream or whatever. Yet, where is that on the ballot? Those same people would then say that young people are too easily influenced. They're obviously overlooking the whole principle of repeating negative attack adds before an election. It's adults that those adds are aimed at and it's adults that are being so easily influenced. If you hear something often enough, no matter what age you are, you'll start to think it's true (unless the personality that you were born with is strong enough to fight it). Yet, is it really true?

 

At the last presidential election, I was three months shy of being legally able to vote. At the time, I would have voted for Bush (or indeed any Republican). This time around, I plan to vote for Kerry (or indeed anyone but a Republican). Some would argue that such a dramatic change in political views is evidence that young people lack the ability to make a logically reasoned decision when it comes to voting. The truth is that many (possibly most) people of any age in this country lack logical reasoning when it comes to their political views. The difference is that younger people, especially those who are still in school, are more apt to learn and change. The problem lies with those who feel that holding a view for a few decades somehow makes it true. This is often the came with groups of adults who have never questioned their beliefs and feel that anyone who does question his beliefs is somehow either weak or wicked. This is how a few older men in the South still feel that Blacks are somehow inferior. It's the same willful ignorance that kept women or people under 21 from voting simply because that's the way it had always been and few people actually stopped to question it. A stubborn inability to make reasoned decisions that question a long held belief is not evidence that an entire class or people are inferior and should not be allowed to vote. Many older adults stubbornly stick to a biased view that blinds them to the truth (for example, the biased view that teens are inferior to them), but I'm not calling for all adults to be denied the right to vote for that reason. I'm calling for everyone to have equal rights.

 

Within the lifetime of many adults today, those under 21 years of age were denied the right to vote. They could be drafted and sent off to war, but they still had no rights or say in the matter. They were simply the ones fighting the wars. The 40 and up crowd were the ones creating the laws and making the wars. The same arguments were made back then, that young people aren't capable of voting intelligently. It's a roundabout way of saying that intelligence and age go hand in hand. Clearly, that's not true. Issues such as education and taxes effect everyone, including teens. Many teens work and pay taxes, but because of discrimination, are taxed without representation. Many (if not most) Americans of any age don't understand issues from bonds to budgets. They rely on other people who they like (possibly because they were raised believing in a certain political party) to tell them how to vote. For a long time, women were not allowed to vote because there was a common belief among the men of the time that women could not make rational decisions because they were too emotionally driven and weak. Today, women's votes make up half of all the votes in this country.

 

Counting a 14-year-old's vote as only 1/4 of an adult vote is reminiscent of the fact that the Constitution only counted Blacks as a fraction of a person. For years, Blacks were slaves to their masters in a similar way to how teens are still property of their parents. Even after the abolition of slavery, Blacks were still denied equal voting rights. Many people figured (or hoped) that most Blacks were still illiterate and therefore incapable of voting. However, regardless of how few might vote, it was still unfair to deny all Blacks that right. The same hold's true today. One of the arguments against lowering the voting age is that teens would be too busy or disinterested to vote. However, what about those who are informed and interested? Should they be denied their rights? One of the reasons that young people aren't more politically involved is that they are constantly told that they don't matter or how childlike they supposedly are. As I said earlier, if you hear something often enough it sticks. And, why stop at counting teens as fractions of adults or denying the right to vote to preteens? Why not treat everyone fairly? If some people aren't educated enough to vote, we should educate them. Perhaps not many people under a certain age would vote. Most Americans don't speak out against the government, so should we all be denied the right to free speech if not enough of us are going to use it?

 

It seems ridiculous that we should even be having this discussion; that one group of people would be so unwilling to grant another group of pople the same fundamental rights that they enjoy. Yet, it's been happening for years. Perhaps they're simply afraid that issues that effect young people will actually be decided by young people. Who knows, eventually teens may want a say in their own lives and want the respect they deserve as human beings. They may even want to choose their own religion or things like that. I'm sure it's frightening for adults. I can only imagine how it felt for the slave owners when Blacks were freed and (gulp!) given a say in how their lives and their government were run. Still, the ultimate goal is not to take rights away from any group of people. It is to give the same rights to everyone. It may be a scary concept, but there are few nobler goals or visions. One day, we'll have a world where everyone, regardless of race, gender, age, attractions or anything else, is treating equally and fairly. Everyone is an individual and everyone is different. The one thing we all have in common is that we're all human. It's time we put aside our differences and accept that fact. Then, and only then, will this world truly be a better place.


 Previous | My Thoughts | Topics | Next

Proposal to Lower the Voting Age
(This proposal makes the case for why Washington, DC should lower its voting age, but the research and arguments are universal.)

Children's Most Essential Right (PDF)
(Well researched paper by Ben O'Meara focuses on the legal argument for lowering the voting age and the use of social science research to buttress that argument.)

Expanding the Pool of Immature Voters Would Not Help
"There is a good deal of truth to the saying, “With age comes wisdom,” even if it is an oversimplification. Remember when you were 14 years old? If you were a typical teenager, you thought you knew everything, but now you realize you weren’t really that enlightened."

Should We Lower the Voting Age?
"Some naysayers use statistics to dispute this, citing poor voter turnout among 18-to-24-year-olds and little understanding by high school seniors of basic government functions. Others claim that those under 18 are immature, easily manipulated, and uninterested and/or uninformed on political issues. While not every high school sophomore has the independence, aptitude, and intellect of the ever-sarcastic Joey Potter, teens are more informed now than in 1971. This is due in large part to the Internet and a more sophisticated school curriculum, which includes classes such as government, and economics. Not to mention that there is no evidence that teens are less knowledgeable on political issues than adults."

Raise the Voting Age to 30
(So over the top that I can only assume/hope it must be a parody, but it does sum up what many people actually do believe:)
"To get the answer to these questions you have to watch television news regularly for at least 20 years. This is unrealistic to ask of anyone who is not at least between the ages of 25 and 30."
"The big difficulty in getting voting age raised 30 is that the vote is like a cancer. Once people have a say in how they are governed, its hard to get them to give it up."
"The next thing you know their 14 and 15 year old brothers and sisters would also want a say in such issues as how much national debt Generation Y will have to pay back, how many immigrants we allow to compete with them for the few jobs available, and how many species we choose to exterminate."
"Those who slavishly cling to notions of democracy of the people by the people and for the people, should be recognized as the zealots they are. Anyone with a bit of common sense - like Churchill had -- realizes that democracy can't literally include all of the people."

Mock the Vote
"With young voters favoring John Kerry over George Bush, election boards across the country are illegally denying college students the right to vote"

National Youth Rights Association

Voting Age Forum

Voting Age - Should it be lowered?
(various viewpoints)

FreeRepublic.com "A Conservative News Forum" Debate
(viewpoints)
American Bar Association Facts About Voting Rights:
1. When the U.S. Constitution was ratified 200 years ago, the electorate included only a small portion of the total adult population. Since then, the right to vote has steadily been expanded. Eight of the 16 amendments to the Constitution adopted since the Bill of Rights have involved voting rights.
2. The Fifteenth Amendment (1870) stated that one's right to vote may not be denied on account of race, color or having been a slave; the Nineteenth (1920) extended the vote to women; the Twenty Fourth (1964) barred poll taxes in federal elections; and the Twenty Sixth (1971) extended the vote to eighteen-year-olds.
3. Despite constitutional guarantees, other restraints kept minorities from voting. By 1940 only three percent of Southern blacks of voting age were registered. Now, protective laws bar poll tests, mandate bilingual assistance where needed and prohibit the government from making policies that dilute the proportional representation of a racial or ethnic group. By 1992, 54 percent of Southern blacks of voting age voted -- a proportion almost exactly that of the national average.
4. The Supreme Court decision in Westberry v. Sanders, 376 U.S. 1 (1964) required states to draw congressional districts that are as equal in population as possible, ensuring proportional representation.
5. In 1982, the Voting Rights Act established a "results test," which outlawed drawing of voting district lines that resulted in discrimination against a specific group, whether or not discrimination was intended.
6. Many states have laws helping persons with disabilities, the homeless and others to vote.
7. The National Voter Registration Act ("Motor Voter Act") of 1994 requires states to streamline voter registration by allowing registration for federal elections by mail and at state drivers license facilities.
8. The 1992 presidential election showed the highest voter turnout since 1972. Yet only 55 percent of Americans of voting age (104,405,155 voters) cast ballots. And only 38 percent (73,152,131 voters) voted in the 1994 congressional elections.
9. The state of Minnesota traditionally has had the highest voter turnout: 72% of voting-age Minnesotans voted in the 1992 Presidential election; 53% voted in 1994.
Hosted by www.Geocities.ws

1