Class Struggle
85 August-September 2009
Aotearoa: Make the Bosses Pay for their
Crisis!
Afghanisan: Defeat the Imperialist Invaders!
South Africa: Forward to the General Strike!
Argentina: Zanon occupation sold-out
Debate on China as Imperialist
IFLT delegation at antiwar assembly
Founding Congress of LFTI July 2009
CHEAP SHOTS
Bennett Bashes Beneficiaries
As the recession deepens laid-off workers by the thousand are lining up
to claim a right won through bitter struggle in earlier depressions- namely the
right to an unemployment benefit. The capitalist overclass and their
parliamentary representatives have anticipated this and are desperately seeking
ways to divert the rising tide of working class outrage at the ways they are
immensely profiting from a crisis of their own creation. Having in opposition
wept crocodile tears about the emergence in NZ of an ‘underclass’ they are now
in government reverting to their time honoured posture of blaming that
‘underclass’ of beneficiaries for all the social social evils spawned by
decadent capitalism as a prelude to attacks on working class entitlements,
including citzenship rights such as the client confidentiality of beneficiaries
and the democratic right to criticize the government without having one’s
privacy violated. In doing so they fully intent on creating an underclass in the sense of a stratum of society denied
full citizenship status. The corporate media are complicit in this attack on
society’s most vulnerable, and have abetted welfare minister Paula Bennett’s
crime by publishing the names of those whose income’s she revealed and
enthusiastically participated in the redneck abuse to which this has exposed
them.
The strategy of picking on beneficiaries conveniently diverts media
attention from parliamentarian’s perks such as travel allowances and subsidised
housing. (While speaking of subsidised housing, let’s remember that amongst the
supplementary benefits that can swell a beneficiary’s apparent income is the Accommodation Supplement, which is available
to employed workers but is nothing but a state subsidy to capitalist
landlords.) However its main thrust is
to create division in the working class and cultivate the fascist mentality
which they will find so useful to smashing worker’s organisations. Workers,
whether still employed or laid-off must not allow their solidarity to be so
easily undermined.
The beneficiaries under attack had dared criticise Bennett for scrapping
the Training Incentive Allowances which presumably had helped Bennett herself
escape from the despised underclass. Other measures the Key government is
currently undertaking to make the victims of their crisis pay for it are the
cutting of funding for community education and the restriction of access to
certain special benefits such as the Independent Youth Benefit. In the latter
case young workers are being offered places in the Army’s Limited Service
Volunteer Scheme and told that declining could mean the loss of IYB. As Key
& Co deepen NZ’s involvement in imperialist war they are capitalising on
the propaganda value of Corporal Apiata’s VC and following in Mussolini’s
footsteps by ‘firing unemployment out of the barrel of a gun.’ The working
class has seen it all before and the world has seen it once too often.
Kiwi Banksters
Rule OK
The NACTS new ETS is a victory for international finance capital. They
can invest in NZ and be confidence in the knowledge that there will be carbon
costs to deduct from their super-profits. Industry can pollute without paying
any of the costs. They don’t even have to go through the pretence of paying a
carbon tax, or buying carbon credits and passing on the cost to the consumer.
No the NACT government is so confident of its popular mandate that it doesn’t
even both disguising the fact that the costs of
carbon emissions will be paid for by the taxpayer- that is the working class.
This is something that the ACT party could have supported, but National
has to make some gesture towards recognising Climate Change to continue sucking
up to the US. On the other hand they did not want to impose even the minimal
charges for Climate Change in the existing ETS passed into law by the Labour
Government last year. So to balance themselves between ACT and Labour they did
a deal with the Maori Party to get the votes they needed.
The Maori Party retracted its minority report which said the polluters should
pay, in exchange for a few token beads and blankets (targeted welfare provision
etc) but more importantly, Maori forestry and fisheries can take advantage of
the massive cross subsidies from the taxpayer to pay for their pollution. Maybe
Tariana Turia and Peter Sharples think that this is justice and recompense for
the theft of land and the Foreshore and Seabed.
Whose Recession?
World capitalism is a system that is now more
destructive than it is useful.
Destruction has been to the lives of the labouring class, and to the
productive land, building, machinery; destroying the forces of production. The
financial crisis coming out of the USA banking sector and rippling out through
their finance institutions around the world is one aspect of this. Banks use interest rate increases to squeeze
(with a death grip) profit from loans to industrial capitalists and that layer
of workers who have taken loans (mortgages). Industry passes the bill onto its
labourers through every-which-way; restructuring, plant closures, layoffs and
wages cuts.
The other feature of capitalisms destruction is
causing direct damage to the means of production. The biggest example is through the state of
war that the USA has been in. They have to have the record for the most invasions in world history: flying around
dropping bombs and sending invading troops into numerous countries, the most
recent Afghanistan and Honduras, not to mention their clandestine methods by
the CIA. Dropping death and destruction: Labourers of the towns and cities lose
their work when whole buildings (and machinery) are destroyed. Labourers of the
countryside lose livestock, tools, crops, and land itself to the US bombing,
since unexploded bombs ruin the land – unusable.
This crisis is world capitalism in its death
agony, yet in its convulsions it tightens its grip on the labourers to squeeze
profit from our lives. They are having
the crisis and putting it all onto the working class to pay for it: It is the
working class through our human labour that is productive, and is the source of
all value. Capitalism is so destructive
it is strangling & killing the working class.
Around the world capitalist governments defend
the capitalists and attack workers. Many
states have said they will protect workers money in the banks by guaranteeing
funds against banks/finance companies failing.
This is protection for the finance capitalist as a bailout, and the
working class will pay for it since we produce the wealth. The governments are
really protecting the financial capitalist, and they try to sustain the
illusion / delusion that some workers have, that the system is alright.
The government guarantee of the banks is
essentially a loan from the working class (through taxes) to keep the finance
capitalists afloat. Those same Finance capitalists who are squeezing profits
from the working people: from labourers as waged slaves, or ‘self employed’ /
(contract slaves) paid on piece rates (per finished job) or in a small business
model where the banker (finance capitalist) is behind it all their owner /
landlord, since the finance capitalist claims an ownership right on their means
of their production.
The USA and other state have also used working
class resources to provide a welfare for the industrial capitalists The bailout
of General Motors to rebuild the company and attack the working class is all
state funded (see article in Class Struggle 84)
The State has controlled the working class by
dividing us against each other. But they
can no longer afford to pay the same premium that they used to the state forces
police / army and private mercenaries. There are less crumbs from the
capitalist table given as rewards to those workers who control the working
class and defend the capitalists interests.
Crisis of Capitalism in NZ
The outright pro-capitalist government of NZ
tries to scare the working class by talking up the problem of the economic
crisis, at every chance, it is their standard excuse for attacking the working
class. However they are still scared of
waking up working class fight back. They have been using reports from “experts”
or “committees” which they set up, to throw recommendations of cuts into the
media and test public opinion; how much fight would that provoke from the
working class. As usual in any round of attacks they attack the single mothers,
on the domestic purposes benefit among the first (WINZ training allowance). http://tumeke.blogspot.com/2009/07/whats-good-for-paula-bennett-is-too.html
The government is selling bullshit to the
working class. In Health, they tell the “public” that frontline services will
not be cut. But they are cutting by
telling every health board to live within their budget and therefore forcing
restructuring and rounds of costs cutting: cutting back room staff means the
frontline have more work to do. The Minister of Health is demanding to know
what services can be contracted out (at cheaper rates – less quality services
for the working class).
Minister of Local government wants to cut social
services too. Rodney Hide wants to define the core business of councils.
All these cuts are attacks on the social wages,
which are paid as subsidise the whole of NZ capitalist class relations. Social wages partly maintain the myth that we
are all equal – because we can all get into the same library: the same swimming
pool (in south Auckland anyway), or wait for free in the same queue for a state
house, hip replacement, heart bypass, blood test...
Industrial capitalists; Telecom was built by the
working class and possession taken by private capitalists. Telecom has made
less profit this year: Now they are setting about attacking the wages and
conditions of the workforce. Telecom through a system of three sub-contracters
for network engineers, are using Visionstream, Downer and Transfield to cut
costs. The way they do this is to attack the wages and job security of its
workforce by making them redundant, stealing their jobs. http://www.indymedia.org.nz/article/77530/telco-workers-take-lightning-strike-acti
Visionstream want workers to buy their jobs back
vans and tools and they will be 100% dependent contractors. The lines engineers would take an income hit of 50%+, with no guarantee of work. Vision stream
are effectively offering a contract like back under the employment contracts
act – type of industrial relations, only worse, no guarantee of work.
The other contractors, Downer and Transfield
attacked their workers too. Downer is trying to force its workers onto piece
rates while Transfield just made 154 staff redundant. Telecom aims increase
profit at the expense of its workforce and the upkeep or maintenance of our
telecoms infrastructure. Telecom will take the most profit they can from the
working class, while we will have to pay for installing a whole network in new
technology of broadband for faster better internet.
The overall effect of the bosses’ attacks is to
create a larger reserve of workers, waiting for work, needing to work to
survive. Marx called this the reserve army of labour. Unlike the seagulls that used to be seen
waiting for potential work on the ports – the modern reserve army (unemployed,
under-employed, casual labourers and increasingly contractors) all wait at
their phones in the morning to hear what work / if any – there is for them, on
a day-to-day basis. And they will get called in to the WINZ office if
capitalist state decides its time to put more pressure on about taking any job.
Engineers union (EU) has been forced into strike
action by the telecom workers (now employed by subcontractors). But actually the EU leads workers to accept
the next deal offered by the employers – like the Air NZ engineers the EU
didn’t take strike industrial action to ground the airplanes and stop Air NZs
profits from rolling in. The EU wouldn’t let them – because strikes would have
been illegal, and the EU is tamed by a legal whip. That sort of industrial
action would have needed the unity of all the unions involved in Air NZ and
breaking the bosses law, which kept unions on the leash. The EU just used
lawyers and accountants to look at the Air NZ books and come up with an offer
that was sold out the working classes - wages, conditions and jobs. The employment laws have always been
capitalisms tool to keep organised workers tamed – and they have been effective
in NZs recent history.
Unions tied to the employment laws have the
teeth taken out of any fight back. Union
officials are threatened by capitalism with seizure of their property, etc. if
they lead workers into breaking the Employment Relations Act (ERA). That was a
Labour Governments gift to the working class: yeah right. Union officials lead organised workers away
from fighting the system, into playing losing legal games with lawyers. Union officials become capitalism’s police on
the working class.
Organised workers need to prepare to go
“underground” and act outside the ERA: otherwise we cannot fight for our needs,
rights, or defend our interests. Union organisers caught in the tension between
what the workers want to fight for (and how), and the limits they are held
under. All union organisers need to be paid at the same rates as the union
members. Genuine workers democracy in the unions would push/pull the union
officials and break through the limits of the ERA leash.
ZEAL deal is not the REAL deal
Anything less than the conditions of Air NZ
short haul crews, is a cut in jobs and conditions as an occupation of flight
workers. The short haul crew is the benchmark and should be seen as the minimum
wage (& conditions) for any flight crew. Instead the EU tries to up sell
the deal as a step in the right direction: “substantial improvements”. The EU call this a victory “a 3.95% pay
increase” (less than the cost of living), a 6.7% increase after 12 months, (a minimal
salary step for experienced crew), an “$1000 up-front payment” (sugar to help
swallow a bitter defeat).
“A working group to look at hours of work and
rostering will also be established”: All talk and no useful action is the
outcome of the dispute going to their lawyers (EU and Bosses). I can imagine
the EU saying, ‘this will have to do this time, but we will have another go at
them in 15 months’.
We say union workers take control of our unions
and take control of our industrial action: make strikes hit the capitalist in
their profits - real pickets have to stop the capitalist collecting any
profit. Ground the aircraft, block the
access, road, phone, fax, and internet, stop their business from functioning –
workers run the place, when we strike then we shut it all down. This is even
easier to do on the inside – so have a strike on site – no work, but occupying
the plant.
Fight capitalisms sliding scale of redundancies
and cuts to wages and conditions. Share the work by reducing hours with no loss
in pay: increase the minimum wages against bosses’ cuts. For a 30hrs week with
no loss of pay and unite the employed and unemployed in the same unions. Workers keep reducing the working week until there
are jobs for all.
For independence of the unions from the
capitalist state! Beware the labour laws and the union officials that are bound
by them, the union officials are made to work for the capitalist by the ERA law
– not for the workers that they are supposed to represent and who pay them
(through union dues). Build fighting
funds (off the ‘legal’ union records). Prepare to pay a strike wage: and elect
ordinary (rank and file) union members (or supporters) to run this.
Organise local picket line defence committees,
with telephone / txt communications set up, so that we can defend each other
against attacks from the bosses – at short notice. Prepare to defend workers
against redundancy, against mortgagee sales, against lockouts and against having
to reapply or contract for our jobs on lower wages or conditions. For working
class communities to build self-defence pickets to support any workers
struggling against the bosses’ recession: support the telecom workers at any
pickets.
Fight redundancy with occupations and workers control!
Build revolutionary cells
in the unions and across unions in local communities.
We need to link all of
these struggles and to fight the system as whole.
For a national congress of
the ordinary workers (rank and file) to fight or a workers programme to make
the bosses’ pay for their crisis.
We say that programme needs
to be workers control through socialist revolution.
Join us in building a
revolutionary party whose one purpose is to end this system.
Afghanistan
Defeat the Imperialist Invaders!
NZ: US Deputy Dog
New Zealand is one of US imperialism's client
states that trades the lives of its troops for favored business deals with the
US. It is about to heed the call from Obama to send 70 SAS troops to Afghanistan.
Obama, NATO, Australia etc., and now John Key, the NZ Prime Minister, all claim
that the war in Afghanistan is necessary to defeat Al Qaeda and the Taliban and
stop them from breeding new generations of 'terrorists'.
This is a lie. This war is a proxy imperialist
war for oil and gas, part of the US fight to get control of the vast oil and
gas reserves of Central Asia. The Taliban are not "terrorists" but
nationalists fighting for their independence. The Karzai US puppet government
controls little more than Kabul, and even then Kabul is under constant rocket
and suicide bomber attacks. What is more, Karzai is just another ruthless
warlord making deals with the ethnic rivals of the Pashtun. This includes
passing a law which allows men to rape their wives in the Shia minority. Thus
the idea that Karzai represents ‘western democracy’ against the ‘barbaric
Taliban’ is another huge lie.
http://gordoncampbell.scoop.co.nz/2009/08/18/gordon-campbell-on-the-afghan-marital-rape-law/
Defeat all
imperialist invaders
We say that the imperialists have no business in
Afghanistan. They should keep their nose out of Afghanistan's business. The
Taliban are mainly a Pashtun tribal people fighting for their national
independence after centuries of 'Western' invasions and occupations. They
always defeated imperialism in the past and they are about to defeat it again.
We are for the defeat of the invaders and occupiers! This includes the
so-called non-combatant Engineers (Reconstruction Team) whose presence in
Afghanistan building schools and hospitals bolsters the legitimacy of the
puppet Karzai regime. Unlike the reformist left that calls for ‘peacekeepers’
and reconstruction teams we are for the defeat of all kinds of imperialist
invaders including the NZ Engineers and UN personnel. http://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/PO0908/S00111.htm
We are for the victory of
the Taliban!
We say this because while the Taliban are a
reactionary national bourgeois faction only interested in profiting from its
control of Afghanistan and the exploitation of its workers, we support it in
its fight against imperialism. However reactionary the Taliban is in its social
attitudes towards women, towards secularism, and towards democratic rights,
imperialism, even the so-called 'democratic' imperialism of Obama, is 1000
times worse. Why? Because whatever the Taliban is today, this is the result of
centuries of imperialist wars, invasions and oppression. Only by defeating
imperialism will the popular masses of Afghanistan be able to rid itself of its
main enemy, imperialism, and overthrow the reactionary Taliban leadership.
To win this struggle is it necessary for the
workers and poor peasants to unite against imperialism and their tribal
warlords. These warlords all want to be junior partners with one or other
imperialist power. The Taliban control the opium trade (90% of the worlds supply)
in collaboration with drug lords and drug multinationals. The Hazaras and
Uzbeks have done deals with the US and Karzai against the Taliban. None of the
warlords of these ethnic groups will break with imperialism. Only workers and
poor peasants united behind a revolutionary communist party can defeat
imperialism and open the road to socialism.
Hands off Afghanistan!
Hands off Pakistan!
End the national debt! Expropriate imperialist and capitalist
property!
Opium trade under workers (producers) collective control! Oil
& gas under workers control!
For the right to self-determination of all ethnic groups not only
the Taliban!
For a revolutionary communist party independent of imperialism and
nationalist or religious leaders!
For a Workers and Peasants Government and a socialist Afghanistan!
For a federation of
socialist republics of the Middle East and Central Asia!
The Stakes for Imperialism
The fact is however, that US imperialism needs
to win this war to ensure its ongoing world dominance. It has used NATO to
breakup Yugoslavia and create is protectorate Kosovo. It was behind the Georgia
attack on South Ossetia and Abkhazia. It plans to break up the former Soviet
territory in the Caucasus and in the Caspian region. The US plans to
“Balkanise” the Caucasus by splitting off breakaway ethnic groups. http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=14779
Without control of Afghanistan the US will win
the “great game”. I will not gain military dominance of this former Soviet
Union sphere of interest and fail to break the hold of Russia and China on the energy
resources of Central Asia. Russia has retained many of the former soviet
republics as part of the CIS. It retains its nuclear arsenal and missile
defence system. It has formed the CSTO (Central Security Treaty Organisation)
with Belarus, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan and Uzbekistan. It still dominates the production and
distribution of oil and gas in the region. China has joined with Russia in the
(SCO) Shanghai Cooperation Organisation to protect Central Asia as a joint
sphere of interest. The differences between Russia and China over who will
ultimately control the region have been temporarily sidelined in the interests
of presenting a united front to the US bloc.
So what is shaping up here is not a war against
terror, but a war of terror - the start of a terrible escalation of regional
wars into a global war against Russia and China that will inevitably run the
risk of nuclear war. NZ is clearly joining the military bloc on one side of
this escalation by sending combat troops to Afghanistan. Why is this? The NZ finance capitalists want to share in
the plunder of the prize of Central Asian oil and gas.
The Prize of Central Asia
What is a stake in Central Asia and the Caucasus is around
half the world’s natural gas reserves. The US has won control of Iraqi
oilfields from its imperialist rivals. Afghanistan is a key country to control
oil routes from the Caucasus and the Central Asian partners of Russia and
China. China has oil interests in Iran
and in Azerbaijan and Tajikistan. The US plan is to break up the SCO and Russia
and China’s sphere of interest in Eurasia. US attacks on Pakistan puts pressure
on both Iran and India which are associated with the SCO.
Critical to achieving this plan is control of Iran. Iran is
today at the center of the zone of conflict between the two power blocs.
Germany, Russia and China continue to trade with and invest in Iran while the
US, France and Britain are imposing UN economic sanctions on Iran to stop it
from developing nuclear weapons. Obama wants to regain control of Iran and is
holding out the olive branch to Iran with one hand, while at the same time
using the threat of Israeli bombs with the other. The US ruling class is torn
between destabilizing the Islamic regime and risking a revolution in Iran which
would spread to the whole Middle East. If it can break up the Caucasus, weaken
Russia and China, and surround Iran, without sparking revolution, then it would
be able to dominate and plunder the whole of the Middle East and Central Asia.
NZ finance capital has backed what it sees as the victorious US bloc. Why?
NZ a minor semi-colony
NZ is clearly a minor semi-colony whose plunge down
the OECD pecking order reflects its dire economic decline. The policy of the
Labour Government reflected the interests of the weak NZ bourgeois fraction of
productive capital that sought to do business with both US imperialism and the
China/Russia bloc – its so-called ‘multilateralism’. It sent the SAS to
Afghanistan in 2001 under the UN sanctioned "war on terror" but
replaced them in 2005 with Engineers to build schools and other public
utilities.
The National party represents that fraction of
the NZ bourgeoisie that is aligned to international finance capital parasitic
on productive capital. The National regime under John Key is signaling the
desperation of that fraction of the NZ ruling class that is allied to the
parasites of Wall St. Its class interests are to share in the profits of the
plunder of productive resources of the world by backing US imperialism against
the rise of China and Russia.
In NZ Key's "change" policy in NZ is to
solve the crisis by making the workers pay for it. This means cutting wages
jobs and taxes to capital to encourage foreign investment. It plans to
privatize remaining state assets. It
plans to bulldoze this rightwing economic policy through using the neo-liberal
shock tactics of the 1980s and 1990s.
Thus NZ is committing itself as a subservient
client state of US imperialism both as a source of superprofits and as a
mercenary military force in imperialist wars. The NZ lackey bourgeoisie expect
to get a dividend from the blood of Kiwi soldiers (a majority are Maori from the
working class) sold to their imperialist masters.
For workers to live, capitalism must die!
In the epoch of imperialism, each global crisis
such as we face today, brings with it the threat of war, and as a result
revolution and counter-revolution. These wars are inevitable as each
imperialist power or bloc of powers must defeat its rival to grab its territory
and resources. Imperialist powers have no other course as they can only survive
at the expense of defeating their rivals. Iraq, Afghanistan and Pakistan are
wars for oil that can only be explained as proxy inter-imperialist wars with
the potential to blow up into a global war.
Such wars, however, involve the working class on
one side or the other using them as cannon fodder and exposing them to terror,
starvation or genocide. If imperialist wars are not stopped by us workers
turning our guns on our own ruling classes, then our fate will be
counter-revolutionary defeats, the decline into generalized barbarism. Today facing
the crisis of global warming caused by imperialist super-exploitation of the globe,
this could mean the destruction of nature and the planet.
However, if the working class can organize
internationally and stop imperialist wars by overthrowing their ruling classes,
then such wars will not lead to counter-revolutionary defeats for workers. They
will spark insurrections, a world revolution, the expropriation of the property
of the ruling class, and open the road to international socialism and to the
end of the destruction and barbarism of capitalist imperialism.
For such a revolution to be possible, workers
internationally must organize into a revolutionary force across national
borders, united behind a world revolutionary party and program.
The internationalist Leninist Trotskyists of our tendency call on
all those who want to fight for socialism to unite their forces with ours and
to build a new world revolutionary party based on the program of the Founding
Congress of the Fourth International of 1938.
Communist Workers Group (Aotearoa/NZ); a member
of the International Leninist-Trotskyist Fraction.
Cellphone 027 2800080 [email protected] http://redrave.blogspot.org
Argentina
Zanon occupation sold out by the reformists
A law of “expropriation” has
been passed by the Neuquen government that allows the Zanon workers the right
to retain control of the factory they have occupied since 2001. But the price
of that right is that the Neuquen state will pay the creditors of Zanon when it
went bankrupt 23 million pesos which will have to be paid from the earnings of
the factory after wages and depreciation. In other words, what the reformist
‘left’ calls an “expropriation” or “victory” for the workers, is nothing of the
kind. It is the worst form of bourgeois nationalization. It is a
“provincialisation” that allows the state to retain final control and takes the
workers surplus value for the pockets of the Neuquen state which is itself
nothing more than the committee of the Neuquen provincial bourgeoisie!
When this law [No 2656] was passed on
the 13 August, the workers who had been in a long fight to defend their
occupation since 2001 must have felt a great sense of relief. They resisted
years of armed attacks of the bosses, the government and sellouts by the union
leaderships. This proved that only the
struggle of the workers was capable of defending their recovered factory. Zanon, like other factories expropriated by
the workers including the picketers in support, won these factories, not by any
law or ruling class court decision. These
occupations were the result of the untold suffering and heroic deeds of the
revolutionary working class from 2001.
As we have
said in our newspaper Democracia Obrera,
many times, the mass revolutionary offensive that brought down the regime in
2001, forced between 200 and 300 companies into bankruptcy. These were recovered and put into production
by the heroic struggle of the workers to keep their jobs facing a unemployed
rate of 26% or more in Argentina at that time.
Facing this
offensive, the bourgeoisie remained in control of the productive forces and the
nation's key businesses such as banks, transnational corporations, privatized
services, but as a lesser evil allowed those bankrupt companies left abandoned
by the employers in the hands of workers who refused to surrender.
After the bourgeoisie had regained their control
of the state, they attempted to regain their control of their property and
rebuild all the institutions of domination. So while some bankrupt companies were
repossessed, others continued to operate under so form of workers’ cooperative under
but under the law of the legislatures and judges, self-exploiting themselves on
poverty wages, doing piecework or working with obsolete equipment, and in many
cases in miserable living conditions. Thus the workers of Zanon, Brukman, Chilavert,etc
had fought to recover their jobs with great heroism and sacrifice, but without
and real workers control, and subject to the bosses’ laws.
Meanwhile, in
Argentina, a cycle of growth began in 2003 which saw the rate of profit rise at
the expense of much greater exploitation of the working class. Super exploiting
the working class and plundering the nation allowed the bourgeoisie and
transnationals in Argentina to accumulate a huge mass of surplus value over the
years, forcing 50% of workers onto the black labor market, working long shifts,
while the regime paid off loans to the IMF and bonds to foreign creditors that
brought a huge inflation which led in turn to a fall in real wages.
In these circumstances, the recovered factories
remained isolated. The workers can not take more than $ 400 0 - $ 1000 per
month in wages. They have no retirement pension. The truth is that Zanon, like
the rest, is only a partial victory. Without recognition, and having to pay
compensation to the bosses, and under the law of the state, the workers in the recovered
factories remain as super-exploited as the rest of the working class. The only
ones who have “expropriated” anything are the capitalists, bankers and big
corporations, who continue to expropriate the surplus value of the workers. This
is the truth we must tell the working class, not because we have not fought, and
have taken back our jobs, but because our struggles have been betrayed, our forces
divided, under the supervision of the Ministry of labor, the courts and the bourgeois
parliament.
All
class-conscious workers now know this to be the truth. The crisis has begun, big
layoffs, suspensions, salary cuts and a other attacks on the entire working
class come every day. Very soon we will be taking and making new Zanons to
preserve jobs, as the workers did recently in France, USA and Greece. We will
occupy the factories and take the bosses hostage to keep our jobs.
This crisis
demonstrates that despite all the miserable wages, accidents, unemployment and slave
conditions forced upon the workers to boost their profits, the bosses system
cannot prevent profits from falling. All hope that this cycle of expansion
could allow the workers to pressure the bourgeoisie to make concessions is
shown to be false. The promises of the Bolivarians and the Castroists to
negotiate new deals with ‘democratic’ imperialists to reduce the debt and
increase living standards have exploded. Along came the world crisis,
inflation, unemployment, wage cuts and new mass layoffs. The imperialists and
the national bourgeoisies are now forced to take back all hard won concessions
to survive. So for the workers to survive the capitalist system must die.
It follows that the workers of Zanon can not
escape this law of the capitalist system. Either capitalism will take back all
the partial gains of the occupations, including making the workers suffer to
keep their jobs, or the partial gain of the occupation has to be defended by a
revolutionary struggle that takes the working class to power. If the working
class does not take power, it stands to lose everything.
"A law of the legislature in the service of
employers or an historic triumph of the workers?”
So comrades, how is it possible for the entire
Argentina reformist left that the new law on the expropriation of Zanon is a
great historic achievement for the working class? This cannot be true. What
property is expropriated here?
We argue that
the law of this bosses’ provincial government and the bosses’ political parties
of Neuquen (MPN, the PJ and UCR) serve the interest of the transnational oil
companies and the provincial bourgeoisie in Neuquén. The purpose of the law is
to enable the Zanon bosses to pocket the money owned to them by the bankrupt
factory ($23,406,566 million pesos). This will be paid by the workers out of
their labor as ‘compensation’ for their ‘cooperative ownership’.
You cannot
play hide and seek with the interests of the working class. We must tell the truth.
The first truth is that we are facing a reactionary law to serve the bosses, not
the workers. True the law does not openly rob the workers because they operate
the cooperative, and that is a victory that the employers do not have the
strength to take back right now. But the law creates the conditions that will
bring the cooperative to ruin. As a legal “cooperative” like any capitalist
enterprise without capital, it will have to get loans from capitalist banks or
form joint ventures. Then it has to compete in the market and risks failure and
bankruptcy like any other cooperative in capitalist society.
So the truth
is, as we say above, that this law creates conditions were the workers of Zanon
have to exploit themselves to pay compensation to the capitalist creditors. At
the same time the workers have to drop all claims against the employer of more
than 20 million pesos in compensation for layoffs, pensions and wage arrears owing
to the 380 workers-when the factory was abandoned. That is, the bosses’law only recognises the
debts of the capitalist creditors of the factory, and not the debt that the
capitalist factory owner owes the workers.
This means the
workers have to pay their former bosses’ creditors and drop all claims on the
boss in order to get legal title to the factory. Of course they had to do this
became the employers and the government has put a gun to their heads and said,
pay up if you want to keep your cooperative. We can see that this ‘law’ is
really the law of the bosses’ gun, because otherwise why would the workers
agree to pay again the debts of the former boss when they had already provided
from their labor, his profits and his assets? It is their class law that uses a
gun against us.
This act of expropriation
i.e. the "provincialization" of the Zanon plant required by the law
means that the workers have to pay compensation, that is buy the plant from the
creditors. How will they pay? From the surplus labor beyond their necessary
labor, and income set aside for the depreciation of machinery [the cost of
replacing worn-out machinery]. But they are not allowed to charge for the
depreciation of their bodies to pay every cent of the 23 million that the state
recovers from their surplus-labor.
Is this a
victory? Up to now the conquest of the occupation was maintained by the workers
struggle. The bosses were not able to force the workers out at the point of a
gun. But now the occupation is legalised under a law which requires the workers
to buy Zanon for 23 million pesos. This is not a nationalization, or
provincialisation, and certainly not an expropriation. It is not a victory for
the workers because the workers have agreed to pay with their surplus labor for
private property and were not able to guarantee their occupation by force of a
workers expropriation.
The conquest
of Zanon was won by the workers' struggle and now they will lose their money
and their labor and worse, their class consciousness if they believe that the
parliament of the ruling class can pass a law that is favorable to the workers.
Today the reformist left passes off this defeat as a victory for socialist
reforms. This means that workers will be looking at Zanon as a model for
workers expropriations, and when they fail, the reformists will blame the
bosses, the lawyers, the workers, everybody but themselves – betrayers of the
revolution.
The Zanon
workers have every right to sign this deal, as they are isolated and do not
have the power to say no. But you cannot say it's a victory. Instead of passing
off this deal as a victory we need to prepare for the harmful consequences that
this bill will have on the workers of Zanon, of Neuquén, Argentina, and further
afield. What the workers of Zanon need, is the unity of the working class
nationally and internationally to change the balance of power that forced them
to accept this law that only benefits employers.
We must speak
out we must tell the truth to the working class. How did the bosses’ get you to
accept this law? Learn the lesson of the bosses’ using their agents the union bureaucracy
to betray our struggles. The workers of
Zanon were left isolated for 8 years while the bureaucrats looked for a way to
settle the occupation. What other reason is there to explain why after an
uprising that overthrew 5 presidents we end up with the bare minimum, a law
which says we can work provided we buy the bankrupt property from the
creditors?
Let's see, in
the U.S. the super banks that exploit and plunder the world go bankrupt, along
with General Motors and Chrysler. The
ultra-liberals who spoke of the free market now demand that the state pays
their debts and saves their profits. The bank bailouts will be paid by the
workers out of their future wages. The bosses of GM demand as part of the
bailout that the workers “share the pain” with loss of benefits, redundancies,
transfer of pensions, loss of holidays etc.
Can you tell
us what is different between Obama's law to rescue General Motors and Citibank
for the bosses, and the MPN Neuquen law to rescue Zanon for the workers? Apart
from the scale, they are the same. This this means that we have to call the
expropriations of Chavez such as the steel plant of SIDOR in Venezuela a
victory. In that case the Rocca family was paid compensation out of the cash
reserves of the state owned PDVSA. In Argentina we would have to speak of the
victory of the nationalization of British owned railways by the Roca-Runciman
Perón government, for which they paid a huge amount of compensation.
What they all have in common is a bourgeois
nationalisatioin to save the bankrupt capitalists and make the workers pay
their debts out of their wages, by giving up compensation, decent wages, jobs,
holidays, pensions etc. Victory? Balls! The
only way the workers can win a victory is to make the bankrupt bosses’ pay, and
to struggle to expropriate the bosses’ property by their own hands. Such a
victory cannot be delivered by the parliament of the bosses!
To defend a reactionary law of capitalist
parasites is as a workers’ victory is to throw out Karl Marx’s Capital. How far is the PTS prepared to
go in its break with Marxism?
A PTS lawyer, Pedrano, a member of the SOECN-PTS, wrote in an article on the 20 August with the title
“Zanon has been expropriated from the capitalists”, that "The Zanon expropriation
law has finally been passed. It's a step forward for workers' management,
because the Law No. 2656 of the Legislature provides that the land Neuquén, (...), and plant will be
transferred without charge to workers "(bold added). . . It is
important to note also that the workers of Zanon ceramics do not have to pay
anything as the state will sell the factory production for construction sites
(homes, schools, etc.) at cost, which includes
salary and depreciation of machinery "(bold added).
First, this is not an expropriation as Marxists understand the term. The PTS
lawyer should know that compensation of 23 million pesos to the creditors is
not expropriation. Both the former owner Zanon and his creditors get 100%
compensation. No other creditors in Argentina get 100% compensation. An
expropriation happened in 2001 when the workers took over the plant. That was a
victory. Now they are paying 23 to transfer the property rights to the
collective. That is not expropriation.
Trotskyist say:
"... we claim the expropriation of companies monopolizing the war
industry, railways, the main sources of raw materials, etc.
The difference between these claims and the stupid reformist slogan of
nationalization is the following:
1.- We oppose compensation.
2.- We warn the masses against the demagogues Popular Front, which hypocritically
advocate nationalization, but remain in reality agents of capital.
3.- We call upon the masses to rely only on their own revolutionary strength.
4.- We link the question of expropriation with the seizure of power by the
workers and peasants ".
(Transition
Program of the Fourth International, 1938).
Revision 1: hiding exploitation
Second, when a
‘marxist’ lawyer says that the workers do not ‘pay’ he is lying. This ‘marxism’
says that workers do not pay because they still get a wage and can replace and
maintain their machinery. That is they
are guaranteed to reproduce their labor and fixed capital. But what is being
hidden by this phony ‘marxist’ is the exploitation of their wage-labor. The
basis of capitalist exploitation as explained by Karl Marx is being
conveniently covered up to make this law a ‘victory’. The Zanon workers work
necessary labor time to make their wages and keep their machines running, but
they do not get any benefit from the surplus labor time they work and the
surplus-value that they produce. Such a victory would mean that socialism can
be legislated for by the employers.
Pedrano hides the fact that the state is extracting
the surplus value from the workers. The state gets its surplus value in the
form of ceramics at cost prices which is uses for it state infrastructure
projects like schools and clinics. This is the expropriation of the workers to
provide for public services that are part of the social wage that reduces the
factory wage. The bourgeoisie benefits from the workers paying for these
services rather than higher taxes on their wealth. But of course, the Neuquen
state is nothing but the organizing committee for the provincial bosses!
Well, we
challenge Mr. Pedrero to find a capitalist factory that sells its products at
cost. No capitalist parliament in the world would pass a law that capitalists
will sell at cost. It is the opposite they will legislate to make sure that the
workers pay to make sure that employers get more than cost i.e. rescue the
bosses from bankruptcy.
Revision 2: Hiding the ruling class
state
We have shown then that the law of expropriation of the legislature has been a
blatant Neuquén business bailout of creditors, and that far from being a step
forward and a victory for the Zanon workers it will mean they must endure
greater sacrifices.
But the
‘marxists’ of the reformist left have made another revision of Marxism. If the
Neuquen state can legislate for a victory for the workers of Zanon, this means
the state can reform capitalism, and that the state can represent the interests
of workers. Workers don’t need to create their own organisations independent of
the state, instead they just let the reformist left negotiate deals with the
state.
What this
means is the Marx is replaced by Gramsci, so that workers don’t need to
overthrow the state, they just need to put more pressure on the state to bring
about socialism. We can see the PTS, as part of the reformist left of the WSF,
is promoting the social democratic illusion that workers can pressure the
capitalists into accepting workers occupations of factories as long as they are
agree to allowing the state to exploit them. They mask this exploitation by
saying the state is can be pressured to meet the interests of both employers
and workers. All that is required is that workers have good reformist lawyers
to represent their interests in the state.
There is an
intimate connection between the two revisions. If the state has no necessary
requirement to protect the bosses’ property or suppress class conflict, then
‘nationalisation’ can be presented as potentially class neutral. How the state
uses the surplus value extracted from the Zanon workers is a matter of relative
class strength. If the workers are strong enough they can earn a living wage
and insist that their surplus value goes to the benefit of workers and not
bosses as a wage subsidy. If the bosses are stronger they can force down the
wages and extract surplus which goes straight into their pockets or is an
indirect subsidy for profits.
This is pie in
the sky reformism. We have seen how only class struggle can guarantee workers
occupations. The same is true of their wages and conditions. It is not possible
to negotiate with the bosses’ state for a living wage and living social wage,
especially in the middle of a global crisis.
The Zanon workers have no power to maintain a living wage, and no power
to ensure that their surplus value goes to boost the social wage of Neuquen
workers. The only way this can be changed is for the workers to create their
own power, ‘dual power’, against the bosses’ state, to expropriate not only
Zanon, but all bosses property, the banks and the land, to create their own
workers’ state and plan for socialist production for need and not profit.
Marxists are committed
to the postulate on the state which says: "The state is an organ of class
rule, an organ of oppression of one class by another, is the creation of"
order "that legalized this oppression and secured by reducing conflict
between the classes…
"The attitude towards the state is one of the most patent signs that our
Socialist-Revolutionaries and Mensheviks are not socialist in any way (what the
Bolsheviks have always said), but Democrats with a quasi-socialist phraseology.
(The State and Revolution, V. Lenin)
We say to all
the working class in Argentina and worldwide, that although for now the Zanon cooperative
has been forced to give up control over their salaries and allowances, we will
fight to defend their hard won class consciousness that the state is the state
of the bourgeois class, from the corrupting influence of the left reformists.
Stand with the workers of Zanon
It is our
urgent task that the entire working class stands alongside their brothers and
sisters of Zanon to fight to make the capitalists, and not the workers, pay for
the crisis. There is an “alternative” to the bosses’ law.
South
Africa
Forward to a General Strike!
FOR REAL WAGE INCREASES!
JOBS,
FOOD, HOUSES FOR ALL!
WE NEED AN EMERGENCY
WORKERS’ PLAN!
Today the clothing workers and their
unions stand on the point of being destroyed by the capitalists. These attacks
are becoming generalised across all sectors, employed and unemployed. In 1994,
millions of workers and unemployed had hopes of a better life, of permanent
jobs, of decent wages, of adequate health care for all, of a better education.
Now, 15 years later, only 9 million have some sort of work out of a labour
force of 28 million; many are casualised; workers are locked into multi-year
agreements which reduce real wages; millions, mainly youth, face permanent
unemployment; the health system has been collapsed and privatised; thousands of
teachers were retrenched and the education system, inadequate as it was, has
fallen apart, producing many who cannot even spell or count, millions are still
without adequate housing and sanitation, many of the houses that have been
built before and after 1994 are falling apart. While world prices of food and
oil have fallen by over 40%, the food retailers and food monopolies
deliberately starve us through high prices; the government maintains a high
petrol price, although the real cost of a barrel of oil is 3-4US$. In 1994 the
ANC-SACP-Cosatu leaders said the working class must reconcile with the
exploiters.
Before and after 1994, the same group of monopolies control the economy (Anglo
American, Liberty Life, Old Mutual, Rembrant, Sanlam). The bank of New York
controls most of the gold mines, while JP Morgan Chase controls the Reserve
bank; American banks control much of the mining, food production, construction,
engineering as well as much of the food distribution. The international banks
that control our economy are in crisis and are shifting their crisis onto the
shoulders of the working class, through mass retrenchments, low wages, high
prices, mass starvation and homelessness. Workers are expected to sit with
folded arms, conciliate, while the monopolies have not ‘conciliated’ but
accelerated attacks on the working class.
Every year, for decades, these international corporations send more than R200
billion out of the country. Since 1996 they have made much more profits than
they even made under the repressive NP regime. Under the disguise of ‘broad
black economic empowerment’ a small elite of the amabhulu omnyama have become
overnight billionaires, while the masses are dying of hunger, freezing in
shacks or concrete matchboxes. Some alliance leaders are themselves owners of
labour brokers that are brutalising the workers. Workers money is invested in
privatizing health care, in fishing companies (while the small fishermen
starve), in Sasol (despite having workers resolutions to nationalise it); many
trade union leaders promote multi-year agreements that cut real wages and work
hard to deactivate the current wave of strikes and protests by the working
class. They hand over billions of workers’ money to ‘bail’ out the capitalists.
Many of the trade union leaders are themselves conveyor belts of the world
capitalist crisis onto the shoulders of the working class. The main conveyor
belt of the crisis onto the shoulders of the working class has been the
economic policy of the ANC, be it the mild RDP, or the more-openly
pro-capitalist GEAR and current ‘Zumanomics’ (neo-GEAR). In 1994 Cosatu and
SACP leaders helped water down working class demands to draft the RDP.
Recently, the Cosatu and SACP justify the current pro-imperialist economic
policy though dispatching their own leaders into Cabinet.
In June this year, through a military base in Honduras, the Obama regime
launched a coup to overthrow the government there. This shows that the crisis
of imperialism-capitalism is so deep that they cannot depend any longer purely
on ‘democratic’ measures of control of the working class.
Recently, there have been increasing number of unprovoked attacks by the police
on community protests, workers’ strikes (such as the transport, municipal,
postal workers), and now the protest of unarmed soldiers. The police are the
direct paid thugs of the monopolies. How long must the working class conciliate
with the murderous monopolies? These imperialists launch coups in Honduras, and
for us, they are starting with increased attacks by the police, they want to
target organisers of protests, they want to ban unions in the army, and who
knows where this will all lead to? If they smash the soldiers unions and bring
back the tens of thousands of SA mercenaries currently fighting in Iraq, what
attacks will then be launched on the working class?
The ANC plan, HR2010, is precisely to dismiss all progressive forces in the
army, including most veterans from the ex-liberation armies (lower ranks will
have an age limit of 28; if you are not constantly promoted, you will be
dismissed; upper ranks will be 4-15 year contracts and special skills will be
head-hunted, eg from the CIA and mercenaries). What is more is that the Cosatu
and SACP leaders who have been deployed to parliament support the mass
dismissal of over 1300 soldiers. These leaders help bail out the capitalists,
while companies, where workers have the so-called majority stake, such as
Frame, are closed down. These leaders are implementing the attacks of
imperialism, against the progressive forces in the army, against the working
class. All worker leaders in government should be recalled immediately. Cosatu
must break with the capitalists!
The International Leninist Trotskyist
Fraction (based South Africa, Peru, Argentina, Bolivia, Brasil, Chile, New
Zealand, USA) stands ready to support this very necessary task.
15.09.09
Issued by Workers International
Vanguard League, 1st Floor, Community House, 41 Salt River rd, Salt
River, 7925, ph 021 4476777; ph 0822020617; [email protected]
web:www.workersinternational.org.za
Minority
Resolution on China
1. The comrades of the CWG and the HRS
agree that when they defend their position that China has a “dual character”.
For the HRS China is both an emerging imperialist nation and a semi-colonial
country with its proletariat super-exploited by both foreign finance capital
and that of its own emerging bourgeoisie. For the CWG China is an Independent
nation emerging as an imperialist power. The HRS and CWG center their argument
on the incremental advance in accumulation of capital into the bosom of the new
Chinese capitalist class who have no choice but to seek profit sources beyond
their own borders. They contend that the most significant factor in Lenin’s
characterization of an imperialist nation is the export of finance
capital.
2. We do
not claim that China as an imperialist country means that capitalism is still
progressive and it is still capable of developing the productive forces. We are
not revising the basic position of Trotsky and Lenin on capitalism in the
imperialist epoch. Neither Lenin nor Trotsky ever said that no new imperialist
country could emerge in the imperialist epoch. But clearly it could do so by
repartition the global economy at the expense of existing imperialist powers.
Nor did Lenin or Trotsky say that that a new imperialist country if it emerged
from a state of being a relatively independent semi-colony must develop the
productive forces and therefore make capitalism "progressive".
3. The fact
that in the imperialist epoch capitalism cannot develop the productive forces
does not mean that capitalism cannot develop technology. Technology in the
imperialist epoch is characterized by intense drive for profit as the rate of
profit continue to decline, hence the workers the great majority of human
beings and well being of the planet are expendable. Therefore, we see mass
death from injury and health problems (cancer for example was not a big health
threat in the 19th century) as technology "advanced". Technological
advancement in the period of imperialist decay leads not only to environmental
disasters but unless there is a socialist revolution, capitalism/imperialism
despite the advancement in technology is likely to destroy the entire planet,
since it develops technology for one reason: profit, and the destruction of
civilization via the advanced military means of the imperialist countries.
4. Any
development of a new imperialist country will only contribute to the
destruction not the advancement of the productive forces and the well being of
the working class and humanity. China is not an exception. Since we live in an
era of dramatic increase of imperialist decay on the international scale, any
new imperialist country can only function as the rest of the imperialist
countries: increase the rate of exploitation and oppression wherever it sets
its foot prints. In the current imperialist epoch China cannot become an
imperialist country by progressing the standard of living of the Chinese
workers and masses in China and the rest of the world, quite the opposite by
driving the masses into living in hellish conditions. This is so, because
in the current state of imperialist decay, this is the only way that a country
can become an imperialist country and try to compete with the rest of the
imperialist gangs. It is easier for a person to jump to the moon, than it is
for a new imperialist country to build its "empire" by elevating well
being of the masses in the current unstoppable decay of the international
imperialist epoch.
5. For us
the dual character of China (for HRS it is a still a semi-colony, and for CWG
an Independent country, but is becoming imperialist), which means that Chinese
workers suffer from one of the worst conditions for workers in the planet,
regardless if they work for Western or Chinese companies. Many of them live in places
that can only be characterized as cages not homes. Millions have been cast out
of their jobs back into the country to stagnate. What progressive about this?
Of course, this only manifests life under imperialism in its last stage of
decay.
6. Chinese export
of capital overseas along with the attempts to develop Chinese sphere of
influence manifests the "destructiveness" of Chinese imperialism, not
its “progressiveness”. In Chad China delivers mass weapons (including soldiers
and workers) to inflame the genocidal war so that China can control the area
and plunder the oil there. What is progressive about this? In Congo they build
mines for their electronics factories in China and like the rest of the
imperialists they muddle in the country affairs. The results: The
intensification of the civil wars over the mines that kill millions and created
huge areas with refugees. And in Iran the Chinese, who of course are interested
in the oil there, have a special connection and influence on the regime who as
we know just killed hundreds and is torturing (many time to death) the
protests' prisoners.
7. Are we
revising the theory of the permanent revolution which says that only the
working class can lead the completion of the national tasks by making a
socialist revolution? Since the 1980's there has been some big changes in the
functions of imperialism that do not change the essence of the permanent
revolution but it forces us to deal with new living contradictions. And it is
these changes that eventually made it possible for China to become an
imperialist country 30 years later. In the super-exploitation of the
semi-colonies since 1980 the rise of the proportion of the proletariat has
given more weight to the working class in taking the lead in completing the
national revolutionary tasks in a socialist revolution.
8. The new
Chinese bourgeoisie has not resolved any national tasks. It has pushed these
tasks backwards by privatizing worker’s property and by re-enforcing the
regimes brutality towards national minorities in China. It retained some
political independence from the period as a degenerate worker’s state. It was
this independence based on both a strong state apparatus and a strong state
owned sector of the economy that allowed the new bourgeoisie to become an
imperialist ruling class. The consequences for the permanent revolution are
these: the Chinese revolution won national independence and the bureaucratized
planned economy allowed the forces of production to develop but insufficiently
to compete with the most backward imperialism. Its degenerated form meant that
it did not complete the national tasks. The restoration of capitalism has put
this independence in question and it and the other national tasks such as the
rights of national minorities can only be resolved by a socialist revolution
led by the working class.
9. With the
outgoing Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) exceeding incoming FDI for the first
time in 2008 and the acceleration of this trend in
10. The HRS
and CWG further contend that China is not in an economic or military position
yet to contest in a conventional war for control of markets and sources of raw
materials. At this stage in its development it will bluster loudly but scramble
to avoid direct military conflict with the major imperialist powers as it knows
it is not prepared to confront the military might of the USA and any head on
war could quickly degenerate to a nuclear exchange. This does not exclude the
possibility of China intervening militarily on its own behalf to advance or
protect its interests in other semi-colonies unless it can get the comprador
bourgeoisie to protect its interests as Alan Garcia did in his murderous attacks
last month on the indigenous people trying to reclaim their lands.
11. At this
stage the main danger of war involving China comes from the USA or Japan (not
to exclude the unlikely possibility of other powers) seeking to contain China,
break open its markets, access its raw materials and labor force. The intention
of such a war would be to drive China from its emerging duel character back to
its prior condition of having the sole character of a semi colony and open its
doors for further imperialist plunder and subjugation. The HRS and CWG contend
that such a war would be characterized as an imperialist war of subjugation not
an inter-imperialist war. In the event of such a war both the HRS and the CWG
would call for the military defense of China and the military defeat of the
USA, Japan or proxy power which may be used by the major power in their stead.
12. The HRS
and CWG are aware that Obama mania is continuing the anti-China chauvinism and
xenophobia which has been building in the imperialist centers for years to
mobilize workers against the perception of a rising power in China. To a large
extent the anti-communist hysteria which has been used against China since
13. This is
the material foundation for the anti-Chinese hysteria western capitalists (in
particular the media in the USA) try to whip up, all the time hiding the fact
that it is the US trans-nationals who have deserted the American worker to
drive down the cost of production and maximize profit leading to the
immiseration of both the Chinese and American worker.
14. The HRS
and the CWG in their economic theses and propaganda show the working class
their real enemy is the barons of Wall Street who perpetuate this process and
are driving the world toward, wars and counterrevolution an who must be
militarily defeated in any confrontation and who must be overthrown by force of
proletarian revolution to prevent the coming catastrophe.
15. It is
with this understanding that the CWG the HRS and the FLTI enter into an open
debate before the public in our press and before the workers of the world clearly
stating that we stand shoulder to shoulder against military threat against
China by the other imperialist powers or their proxies.
FLTI launched-summary of resolutions
The Foundation Congress of the International
Leninist Trotskyist Fraction.
1) Principled agreements that allowed starting the
Foundational Congress of ILTF
a) After a
careful analysis of the points of agreement exposed in the sub-points “a” to
“j” of the 1st point of the “Proposal of Agenda”, the congress
stated that effectively there are more than enough programmatic, strategic and
principled agreements to constitute a common congress among internationalist
revolutionaries.
b) These key
agreements are expressed in the written considerations elaborated by the
conveners before the Congress:
1) The
agreement on the character of the world economic crisis and the offensive of
the imperialist and native bourgeoisies of the colonies and semi-colonies
against the workers and the masses; the tasks posed before the internationalist
revolutionaries to prepare the counteroffensive, fighting against the
reformists, based on the 23 points of
the LTF.
2) The
agreements mentioned before have move forward with the Act of constitution of the Paritary Committee of the ILTF between the
WIVL and the FLT, to which adhered the NRI of Argentina and the
revolutionaries of Sao Pablo, Brazil; this is a programmatic conquer for a
common intervention before the first counterrevolutionary hits, and also before
the first counteroffensive answers of the masses expressed in Greece,
Madagascar, Guadalupe and France, that concentrated the strategy and the
program for the setting up and the development of the soviets and the question
of the insurrection and the struggle for power; together with South Africa,
Bolivia and Zimbabwe, where the struggle against the popular front and the
treacherous leaderships is posed, as well as against the native semi colonial
bourgeoisie, both Bolivarian and Islamic.
3) A few weeks
before the realization of the Congress we received the contribution from the
comrades of the HRS that converged with the conveners, what expresses that the
North American Trotskyists, in the heart of the dominant imperialist power,
began to make this revolutionary program as their own.
4) This
Congress is constituted by those who have recognized each other as
internationalist revolutionaries in the struggle against the social democracy,
Stalinism and the renegades of Trotskyism, against the labor aristocracy and
union bureaucracy- all grouped in the WSF supporting the Bolivarian
bourgeoisies and “democratic imperialism”, all of them supporting Obama-,
looking for the path to build up an International Revolutionary Party based on
the Theory of the Permanent Revolution and
the Transitional Program that have passed the test of history,.
5) The
congress is constituted by those who fight against the “bobby traps” that
organize conferences to distract and disperse the forces of the
revolutionaries. Thus, the Congress adopts the combats of the SCAI of the FLT
against Socialist Fight who called to vote for the British Labor Party in the
elections for the European Parliament and that have a policy of two states for
Palestine; and also de combat of NRI against Philippe Couthon of the GB, who
defends the institutions of 5th French Imperialist Republic before
the uprising of the youth of the French cites and of the masses in the French
colonies. The congress adopts as its own the struggle against the pseudo-conferences of national groups who need
“international prestige”, as the one organized by the Brazilian POM.
6) Therefore,
this Congress considers that there are conditions to move forward in the
struggle for building up an International
Revolutionary Centre, without creating a centrist alchemy, because the
groups converging in this Congress were in the same barricade before the blows
of revolution and counterrevolution.
7) It is
established that this Congress is not convened to get the FLT fatter, but a
superior stage from the confluence of revolutionary wings and personalities, to
move forward in building up an organization in order that the Trotskyist
program find a path to the masses after decades of capitulations and betrayals
of those who speak in its name.
8) We consider
that Trotskyism and Bolshevism were separated from the masses by the
counterrevolutionary violence of fascism, by the action of Stalinism and Social
Democracy; and by the capitulations of Pabloism at the end of the Second World
War, who have adapted to the “democratic” imperialist front. That is why we
affirm that the IVth International will not be able to go back to the masses to
provide them with the leadership and the program for the triumph in an
international level, but fighting against the treacherous leaderships that are
at the head of the organizations of the workers and the masses, and who have
already started their maneuvers to fight against the revolutionaries.
9) It is
resolved to conform the Honorary Chair of the Congress with the worker fighters
of our current and of the class around the world who have given their lives for
the revolution: Comrade Luz, of the
LOI-CI of Argentina and Comrade Roger
Fox, of the CWG of New Zealand, who were victims of the labor and life
conditions imposed by the super exploitation of the bosses; Comrade Mzwandile Matjikiza of South
Africa, burnt alive in the 80’s by the Stalinist SACP, are part of the African
National Congress; The miners of Huanuni,
vanguard of the Bolivian proletariat in the struggle against the repressor and
murderer government of Evo Morales; The Greek
working class and masses, who set up the spark of the revolution in the
Imperialist Europe; The French working
class and working youth, that from the Cites and the occupied factories
search for a fighting path to confront their own imperialist bourgeoisie; The massacred peasants and working masses of
Bagua, Peru, who took executed 26 hunting dogs of the bourgeoisie.
10) The
effective chair of this Congress is constituted.
c) After
having confirmed the agreements, and consistent with the revolutionary method
we vindicate, in ten days of discussion the different groups discussed
fraternally and without diplomacy the differences and shades, being prepared to
convince and to be convinced. This allow us to give a leap forward in the
political homogenization and to move forward the discussion to adjust the
program that allows us to intervene with a revolutionary policy in the
international class struggle.
The main
differences discussed were:
1) The Chinese
question, since a minority of the Congress, constituted by the HRS and the CWG,
states that China is a country with a dual character, with elements of a semi
colonial country and elements of an imperialist country; meanwhile, the
majority states that in the imperialist epoch and under the current conditions
new imperialist countries cannot emerge without splitting wars, and more than
that, that there are too many imperialist powers.
2) The
question of the slogan of a Workers and Peasants’ Black Republic and the
national question -which is a labyrinthic expression of the class struggle at a
worldwide level-, in South Africa and the whole African continent; and on the
Palestinian, Honduran and Iranian questions, as a key aspect for the use of the
theory-program of the Permanent Revolution.
3) The
question of revolutionary use of the democratic demands. We have achieved a
wide agreement about the duty of the revolutionaries to incorporate in their
program the minimal and democratic demands -which are transitory, that is to
say, that they are used if they allow to move forward the combat of the
masses-, as part of the program that must be a bridge from the immediate needs
of the masses and the need to prepare an insurrection to seize the power, as it
is expressed in the resolution “On the
principled questions of the democratic demands used by the revolutionaries” in
particular, and in the resolutions on Honduras, Iran, etc...
2) On the democratic Leninist character of the
Congress
a) The
delegates verify that all the documents elaborated by the different
organizations that converged in this Foundation Congress of the LLTF, as well
as the central articles of the IWO Nº 12 (part I and II), the International
Correspondence-New Epoch # 1 and its
Appendix, as well as the documents written while the congress was in session,
have all been published in English and in Spanish.
b) All the
delegates of the congress had guaranteed the possibility of being in permanent
contact with their organizations by phone and by the Internet, to adjust the
interventions collectively.
c) From that
exposed in the previous points, it is verified that the leaderships and the
rank and file of all the organizations participating in the Congress had the
widest democratic guarantees to know all the positions developed before and
during the Congress.
Therefore, it
is considered that the Organization Committee of the Foundational Congress of
the ILTF, integrated by the SCAI of the FLT, the NRI and the CC of the LOI-CI
(host organization of the Congress), with a big militant effort of the comrades
involved in the tasks of organization and translation, have guaranteed the
democratic development of this Congress. This allowed to move forward in
building an International Revolutionary Centre, that cannot be just the result
of agreements between leaderships, but of the political homogenization of the
rank and file and the cadres of the groups, from a wide debate.
3-On the Agenda. Development of the debates.
Conclusions
After
confirming the character of the Congress, the deliberations begin.
a) On the
world situation and a new moment in the international conjuncture: the Congress
discussed on the written materials published in the International Workers
Organizer # 12, Part I and II, and on the document of the HRS on the economic
crisis and China.
b) When
undertaking this question, a difference on China has been stated. The HRS and
the CWG -with shades between them- characterize China as a country with a dual
character: with elements of a semi colony and elements of an imperialist power.
c) On this
question, a document with the key axes resulting from the discussion during two
days of debate of the Congress is attached bellow; we summarize them as
follows:
1) The
minority composed by HRS y el CWG consider China as a country with a dual
character, with semi colonial features and imperialist country features. (See
document attached)
2) On the
contrary, for the majority of the Congress, in the imperialist epoch of
capitalism in decay, when imperialism is reaction all along the line, China
cannot become an imperialist power but also it is in question its relatively
independent character.
The majority
considers as a result of the counterrevolution, which has been expressed in the
Tiananmen Square and that imposed the restoration of capitalism, China has been
transformed into a great scale maquila by the imperialist powers. The key of the imperialist epoch is the
parasitism of the financial capital of the imperialist powers and the buying of
the labor aristocracy and bureaucracy, which are material forces for the split
of socialism, expressed in the split between the Menshevik Party and the
Bolshevik Party in 1902 in Russia.
3) The
majority of the Congress, composed by the WIVL, the former SCAI of the FLT, the
NRI, the LOI-CI, the POI-CI, the FT, the LTI (Bolivia), the LTI (Peru) and MT
from Brazil, affirms the current crisis of the world capitalist economy shows
that there is an overabundance of imperialist powers and that China is far away
from developing an economy that allows it to accumulate capital going beyond its
national frontiers, as finance capital; and more than that, that China is
incapable of solving the question of land.
Following the
Marxist method of Lenin, the majority affirms that an imperialist power cannot
be defined from its foreign investments of just 50.000.000 dollars (when the
investments abroad of New Zealand are
close to 10.000.000 dollars, or 25.000.000 dollars of Brazil), but that we must
define imperialism from the point of view of Lenin who defined it according to
the merging of the bank capital with the industrial capital becoming financial
capital, which goes beyond the frontiers and constitute itself into monopolies,
concentrating the domination of entire branches of the economy at a worldwide
level trough cartels and trusts.
The majority
affirms that, on the contrary, on one hand, in China the surplus of its
commercial trade is concentrated in bonds of the US treasury and that with them
it finances the deficit of the dominant imperialist power; and with its
reserves in dollars it becomes an insurance of exchange for the imperialist
powers, USA in particular, becoming more and more dependant. Thus, the foreign
investments of China are not a source of super profits for the Chinese
bourgeoisie but they are bounded to guarantee the infrastructure and raw
material, being in charge of obtaining them in those places where imperialism
is unable to reach them, as in the Iranian Kurdistan or the African countries
bled to death by fratricide wars, in order to guarantee the best conditions for
the multinationals (as it is done by Japan for which China is a site for its
assembling plants for the production of the Japanese companies in Asia).
Therefore, China becomes a republiqueta whose native bourgeoisie is in dispute
with Malaysia, Mexico, Pakistan, etc…. for the slice of surplus value taken
from its own working class. And the new world conjuncture poses a new world
division of labor in which imperialism is seeking for transforming the entire
planet in its own domestic market and where China will play the role of
importer of US goods for its high middle class of 300 millions people, at the
same time than producing goods for the third world, on the account of US
imperialism, trough joint ventures and buying patents.
4) The
majority of the Congress considers that the comrades of the HRS and the CWG
yield to the pressure propelled by the imperialist powers that want to
influence the world working class and above all the one of USA with a false
ideology on the “Chinese danger” to confuse the
proletariat and, along side the collaboration of the social
imperialists, the Stalinists and the renegades of Trotskyism, persuade it to
support new military adventures in the dispute for that huge maquila which is
China today, this time “democratic”, dressed as Obama.
5) From the
documents posed by the HRS, the majority affirm that the capitalist restoration
in the former workers states has not been peaceful, and that the alternative
forecast of the Fourth International that stated that without the victory of
the political revolution that put the workers state in the service of the
victory of the world socialist revolution, the bureaucracy would become into a
direct agent of restoration has been confirmed. As Trotsky said, the
restoration would come either by the hand of the imperialist tanks -that is to
say a direct military intervention against the USSR- or by the Ford tractor
-that is to say flooding with cheap goodds- creating the conditions for the
destruction of the bases of the workers’ state and for the re-emerging of a
bourgeoisie and a petty bourgeoisie hostile to the proletariat.
The majority
affirm that the comrades of the HRS mix the fact that the capitalist
restoration in 1989 did not come from a direct imperialist military invasion
–carried on by the German imperialism in the Second World War, and which was
defeated by the heroic soviet masses that smashed the fascist invasion costing
27 millions of death- with a “peaceful” character of restoration.
The majority
affirm that the capitalist restoration was prepared in the 80s and came by the
hand of the “Ford tractor”. That is to
say, it came through the cheap goods from the West; in this case goods in the
shape of money, used by the IMF to deeply indebt the former bureaucratized
workers’ states, originating an openly restorationist bureaucracy who wanted to
become bourgeois, and a social basis closely linked with the imperialist
financial capital, taking those states into a deep decomposition.
But the
capitalist restoration wasn’t peaceful at all. It was imposed in 1989 on the
bases of the smash of the political revolutions of 1953 in Eastern Germany,
1956 in Hungary, 1968 in Czechoslovakia, Georgia and Ukraine, in 1981-82 in
Poland. The restoration was imposed because, from the betrayal of Stalinism and
Social Democracy, the world revolutionary upheaval of 68-74 was defeated. It
was imposed with the massacre in the Tiananmen Square in China; fratricide wars
such as the one between Armenia and Azerbaijan, and with 3 wars in the Balkans
(Croatia, Bosnia, and Kosovo) and with the military attack of NATO against
Serbia in 1999. The restoration was imposed and consolidated in 1991-93, with
the 21 countries coalition, lead by USA, UK that destroyed Iraq.
On the Basis
of these wars, massacres and counterrevolutionary blows, the Bonapartist
bourgeoisie regime of Yeltsin first and Putin later in Russia and of the “red
mandarins” in China were imposed.
That is to
say, that, against the Kautskyst conception of “peaceful path towards
socialism” and its opposed twin, the conception of the pacific road towards the
capitalist restoration (what Trotsky called the “the movie of reformism in
reverse” in its polemic against Craipeau) that infected the leadership of the
Fourth International at the end of the war,
the majority of the ILTF affirm that the forecast and the program of the
Fourth International passed the test of history, but not the Trotskyists who
spoke in their name and capitulated before Stalinism, rejecting to build up the
sections in the former workers’ states after the Second World War. For that
reason, the Fourth International was absent when the political revolution
started in Germany, Hungary, Poland, Czechoslovak, Armenia, China, USSR, etc….
6) Based on
the essential foundations summarized here, according to the point of view of
the majority, the position of the comrades of the HRS and the CWG could put in
question the character of the imperialist epoch since it could allow the
development of an imperialist power within the narrow limits of a single
country.
a) The
minority of the Congress is stating a theoretical difference, not a
programmatic one before the workers’ revolutionary vanguard.
b) The HRS
clarify that in the case of a military confrontation between EEUU and China,
they would be for the military defeat of the EEUU, despite the fact that in its
written materials posed before the Congress this matter has not been
programmatically posed.
c) The CWG
considers that it was a hasty action to publish the anti-defensist position
towards China and Russia in the article on Iran in the last issue of “Class
Struggle”
d) The
Congress resolves to drive a public discussion on the theoretical differences
about the definition of the imperialist epoch and the Chinese question before
the workers’ revolutionary vanguard.
e) The
Congress resolves to intervene programmatically in a centralized way for the
defense of China before any political, economic, or military attack from the
imperialist powers that dispute the domain over China.
f) The
Congress resolves to organize a section of theoretical public debates in the
press of the FLTI; as well as an internal bulletin to discuss the programmatic
differences. At the same time, despite the differences on the program for the
intervention before the acute events of the class struggle at worldwide level,
all the groups that compose the ILTF will intervene in a centralized way with
the position of the majority.
g) The
Congress resolves to convene a Congress in an estimated period of 6 months to
allow that all the discussions and conclusions of these days of elaboration and
homogenization can be discussed and voted by the rank and file of the
organizations that compose the ILTF.
4) On the World situation
a) After three
days of debate, the Congress resolves to adopt as foundational documents of the
ILTF the editorial articles of the International Workers Organizer # 12, part I
and II: “On the world situation: facing historical convulsions”; “The
regime of world domination imposed by imperialism since 1989 is in crisis”; “
The
crisis of revolutionary leadership of the proletariat is becoming more acute”;
and the elaborations on the question of China, Cuba, the historical balance of
the Fourth International and the programmatic and political consequences for
the revolutionary vanguard of the world proletariat.
b) After a
deep discussion on the remaining differences and shades; after very rich
debates with the contribution from the delegates of the different groups that
allow us to solve our differences and get common positions, the congress
resolved to adopt as foundational documents of the ILTF: the statements
elaborated on the acid tests of the class struggle based on the agreements
achieved previously and during the congress: Greece, France, Madagascar,
Guadalupe, Palestine (documents that were points of agreement to call
for this congress), and the documents elaborated before the acid events of the
class struggle like Peru, Iran, and Honduras, voted in the current
congress.
c) The
Congress resolves to reaffirm the need of redoubling the struggle against the treacherous leaderships, that is to say,
against social democrats, Stalinists, anarchists and renegades of Trotskyism,
that today are also disguised as anti-capitalists, all of them grouped in the
World Social Forum and who, through the ELAC, for example, try to put the world
working class at the feet of the “democratic” Obama, of the natives Bolivarian
or Islamic bourgeoisies and of the Castroist restorationist bureaucracy.
d) The
congress resolves to adopt as foundational documents the published materials on
the struggle against the popular front
in Bolivia, South Africa and Zimbabwe;
as well as those on the combat against
Bolivarian governments and the Bonapartist regimes as the Colombian one.
e) The
congress of the FLTI adopt as its own the anti-imperialist published by the
HRS, “Stop Obama’s Wars”; and the document “Alan Benjamin is a class traitor”,
in fight against the renegades of Trotskyism that, in the USA defend the
interests of the workers’ bureaucracy and aristocracy.
f) The
congress of the FLTI adopts as a foundational document the article published in
Democracia Obrera # 32, (November 2008) “The murderous imperialist disguised as Obama”.
g) In the
debates on Palestine, Iran, Honduras and Madagascar, the congress deeply went
over the question of using the
revolutionary democratic demands and the national question, achieving
important advances in the political homogenization as it is expressed in the
resolutions on Peru, Iran and Honduras voted by this Congress.
All resolutions will be placed on the ILTF website;
World Situation; Palestine; Bolivia,
South Africa, Zimbabwe; United States; Greece, Madagascar, Guadeloupe;
Honduras, Peru.
What We Fight For
Overthrow Capitalism
Historically,
capitalism expanded world-wide to free much of humanity from the bonds of
feudal or tribal society, and developed the economy, society and culture to a
new higher level. But it could only do this by exploiting the labor of the
productive classes to make its profits. To survive, capitalism became
increasingly destructive of "nature" and humanity. In the early 20th
century it entered the epoch of imperialism in which successive crises
unleashed wars, revolutions and counter-revolutions. Today we fight to end
capitalism’s wars, famine, oppression and injustice, by mobilising workers to
overthrow their own ruling classes and bring to an end the rotten, exploitative
and oppressive society that has exceeded its use-by date.
Fight for Socialism
By the 20th
century, capitalism had created the pre-conditions for socialism –a world-wide
working class and modern industry capable of meeting all our basic needs. The
potential to eliminate poverty, starvation, disease and war has long existed.
The October Revolution proved this to be true, bringing peace, bread and land
to millions. But it became the victim of the combined assault of imperialism
and Stalinism. After 1924 the USSR, along with its deformed offspring in
Europe, degenerated back towards capitalism. In the absence of a workers
political revolution, capitalism was restored between 1990 and 1992. Vietnam
and China then followed. In the 21sst century only Cuba and North Korea survive
as degenerate workers states. We unconditionally defend these states against
capitalism and fight for political revolution to overthrow the bureaucracy as
part of world socialism.
Defend Marxism
While the
economic conditions for socialism exist today, standing between the working
class and socialism are political, social and cultural barriers. They are the
capitalist state and bourgeois ideology and its agents. These agents claim that
Marxism is dead and capitalism need not be exploitative. We say that Marxism is
a living science that explains both capitalism’s continued exploitation and its
attempts to hide class exploitation behind the appearance of individual
"freedom" and "equality". It reveals how and why the
reformist, Stalinist and centrist misleaders of the working class tie workers
to bourgeois ideas of nationalism, racism, sexism and equality. Such false
beliefs will be exploded when the struggle against the inequality, injustice,
anarchy and barbarism of capitalism in crisis, led by a revolutionary Marxist
party, produces a revolutionary class-consciousness.
For a Revolutionary Party
The bourgeois
and its agents condemn the Marxist party as totalitarian. We say that without a
democratic and a centrally organised party there can be no revolution. We base
our beliefs on the revolutionary tradition of Bolshevism and Trotskyism. Such a
party, armed with a transitional program, forms a bridge that joins the daily
fight to defend all the past and present gains won from capitalism, to the
victorious socialist revolution. Defensive struggles for bourgeois rights and
freedoms, for decent wages and conditions, will link up the struggles of
workers of all nationalities, genders, ethnicities and sexual orientations,
bringing about movements for workers control, political strikes and the arming
of the working class, as necessary steps to workers' power and the smashing of
the bourgeois state. Along the way, workers will learn that each new step is
one of many in a long march to revolutionise every barrier put in the path to
the victorious revolution.
Fight for Communism
Communism
stands for the creation of a classless, stateless society beyond socialism that
is capable of meeting all human needs. Against the ruling class lies that
capitalism can be made "fair" for all; that nature can be
"conserved"; that socialism and communism are "dead"; we
raise the red flag of communism to keep alive the revolutionary tradition of
the' Communist Manifesto of 1848, the Bolshevik-led October Revolution; the
Third Communist International until 1924, the revolutionary Fourth
International up to 1940 before its collapse into centrism. We fight to build a
new, Fifth, Communist International, as a world party of socialism capable of
leading workers to a victorious struggle for socialism.
Class Struggle is the Bi-Monthly paper of the
Communist Workers’ Group of New Zealand/Aotearoa, a member of the Leninist
Trotskyist Fraction [LTF] .
Other member
are: International Workers League (LOI-CI) Argentina, International Workers
Party (POI) Chile, Revolutionary Trotskyist League (RTL) Peru, Red October
International (ORI) Bolivia, and the Trotskyist Fraction (FT) Brazil.
PO Box
6595, Auckland, NZ. Mail address:
PO Box 6595, Auckland, New Zealand.
Email [email protected]