THE EARLY RECORDS OF

WARE RIVER PARISH

 

 

To his Excellency William Shirley Esq., Capt’n General & Govenor in Chief, the hon’able Council & Represent’ives in Gen’l Court assembled, 26th May, 1744.

 

The Petition of Thomas Marsh and others, to the number of thirty three house holders about and between Wear River and Swift River, near Brookfield; Humbly sheweth, That your Petitioners are settled on a track of land bounded, begining at the South west corner of the ten thousand acres of Equivalent land, of Swift River, thence running due east to Brookfield Bounds, thence on Brookfield to Ware River, thence on Ware River to Hardwick; thence on Hardwick to the ten thousand acres of Equivalent land, aforded on the Bounds of the said ten thousand acres including the same, unto the first mentioned Boundary.

 

They dwell at a great distance from any place of Publick worship, most of them six or seven miles, therefore cannot enjoy that privilege in their present condition, but as their hearts are sincerely desirous of the Publick worship of God, they persuade themselves they shall be able cheerfully to bear the Charge that will attend it. But as some of them beinng to the town at the Elbows, some to Brookfield, the rest of them live on farms of the Province Grants, they cannot properly & lawfully Proceed to erect and maintain the Publick worship of god among them, without the aid of the Court.

 

And therefore Pray this hon’ble Court to inquire into their state and circumstances & make them a separate & distinct Township or Parish: and your Petitioners as in duty bound shall ever Pray, &c.

 

Jer’em Omsted            Jab’s Omstead            John Read, for the Pet’

Isreal Omsted            Jos. Marsh            Thomas Marsh

Jacob Comins jun’r            Richard Rogers            Joseph Marks Sen’r

Nahum Davis            Jacob Comins            Joseph Marks

James Commins            Sam’l Allen            Joseph Brooks

Edm’d Ayers            Benj. Shiple            Isaac Magoon jun’r

John Andrason            William Pateson            Thomas Chapen

Joseph Simones            XXXXX            Daniel Thtusen

Job Corly            Isaac Magoon            Sam’l Marsh

John Post            Judah Marsh            Sam’l Davis

Ephraim Marsh                                      Paul Thurston

 

(Thirty-one names only, given in the original record, one of whom, John Read, was probably a nonresident.)

 

The petition was successful. The record shows that the General Court allowed the formation of a Parish, as the Committee that came to the area did not believe that the inhabitants could support a Town. The “Comitte” report said:

 

The Committee appointed on the Petition of Thomas March, & others Living near Ware River in the County of Hampshire, have attended on said service, been upon the spot, viewed the Lands Prayed for to be erected into a Township, inquired into the Circumstances of the Pet'rs & heard the objections of some of the Inhabitants of Kingstown, & are of opinion that the Pet'rs at present are not sufficient in order to erect a Town with privileges &c. but inasmuch as they live at a veary great distance from any place of public Worship, &.meet with great Difficulty thereby we are further of the opinion that the petitioners living Northward of a Line Run due East from the South east Corner of the land Belonging to John Read, Esq. to Western Line be freed from all Taxes to any other Place or Town during the pleasure of the General Court, so that they may be able to provide preaching among themselves.

Which is submitted in the Name & by order of the Comitte, Dec'r 4, 1742.

 

A justice of the peace in Springfield in the following February, 1742 (Old Style) issued a warrant for a meeting to be held “at the house of Jabez Olmstead, in said Precinct on the third Tuesday of march next at ten Clock, forenoon” “to Choose a moderator, to Choose a Clark, and to Choose a Committee to manage the Publick affairs of said Precinct, Assessors, Treasurer, Collector…” Israel Omsted was chosen one of the two “servairs of hi-ways”.

 

The house of Capt. Jabez was also chosen for the Parish Meetings held on 3 March,, 1742, 13 Marsh, 1744, 6 July, 1744, 12 March, 1744, 11 July 1745, and 2 November, 1747.

 

At the 1744 meeting, “Jabes Omsted (was) chosen first Committee man”, Jeremiah Omsted was chosen one of the two “servuaers of hy ways”, and also “hogervige”. Thomas Marsh (father of two of Capt. Jabez’s sons-in-law) was chosen one of the three “commitye and assessers”, Israel Omsted was chosen collector, and Judah Marsh (husband of Hannah Olmsted) was chosen “hogrift”. It was voted at the meeting that “Swine Should run at large with yokes and rings”. This vote was repeated several years in a row.

 

At the 1745 meeting, it was “voted a lowe Cap. Jabez Omsted a bill for boarding minesters, which was five pounds ten shillings, old tener”.

 

At a 11 November, 1745, Cap. Jabez Omsted was chosen one of a committee of four to “decorse with Mr. Carey, and to see what he will take up with” They were evidently covering their bets, since he was also chosen to a committee of two to decorse with Mr. Reed. Capt. Jabez also was allowed a bill of “foure pounds fivrtine Shillings, old tener, for boarding of minesters”.

 

At the 1746 meeting, Judah Marsh was chosen one of the three fence-viewers.

 

At the 1747 meeting, it was voted to “alowe Cap. Omsted five pounds old tener, for going to Boston to treat with Mr. Reed”.

 

At the 1748 meeting, Thomas Marsh was chosen moderator, Israel Omsted was chosen one of the two fence viewers, and Judah Marsh to the committee, and assessor.

 

At a later meeting in 1748, Jabez Omsted and Judah Marsh were chosen for a committee to “carreon work of building a meeting house”.

 

At the July, 1850 meeting, Timothy Brown (husband of Captain Jabez’s daughter, Thankful) was chosen Moderator, “Clerek” and also chosen on the committee to manage the prudential affairs of the precinct. Judah Marsh was chosen one of the two collectors.

 

[Editors note: Remember that Timothy Brown had been captured by the Indians in 1746, and taken to Canada. He was released later. He was evidently welcomed back with open arms.]

 

At a meeting on 23 August 1750, Timothy Brown and Israel Omsted were appointed to a committee of five to “Manage ye affair of Building and Covering the meeting house”.

 

Then a fight started. On 27 August, 1750, nine freeholders from Ware River parish, including Jabez Omsted, Israel Omsted and Judah Marsh, signed a petition calling for a special parish meeting to “Reconsider the vote passed on August 23, 1750 for to set a meeting house on the Country Road, and to see if the precinct will Confirm the place that the Last Com’ttee a-greed on, or to agree on some other place, or agree on some method for building a meeting house and how to build it”.

 

The meeting was held on 1 September, 1750, and Timothy Brown was again chosen Moderator. The vote to reconsidered the August 23 vote was passed, and it was voted that the meeting house should stand on the westwardly side of flat brook, where the last Com’ttee had agreed.

 

This is the extend of the material in my possession concerning the early records of Ware River Parish.

Hosted by www.Geocities.ws

1