O
Patience
is another attribute of love.
Patience also applies to an emotional state. As an emotion, patience designates a
calm and an unruffled state of feelings under circumstances that normally would
excite anger or impatience.
Patience as an emotion is purely an involuntary state of mind, and
although it is a pleasing and good-natured manifestation, this kind of patience
is not properly virtue. Now,
patience as an emotion is often the result of patience as a phenomenon of the
will, which is the result of virtue.
However, patience is not virtue all by itself. This good-natured temper often proceeds
from our constitutional behavior, and from circumstances and habits.
Patience as a virtue
must be a voluntary state of mind.
True patience must be an attribute of love because all virtue, as we have
seen and as the Bible teaches, is no more than unselfish love. The Greek term, ‘upomone’, so often
rendered patience in the New Testament, means ‘perseverance under trials,
continuance, bearing up under affliction, or deprivations, steadfastness of
purpose in spite of obstacles’. We
can use the word patience in a good or a bad sense. Thus, a selfish man may patiently pursue
his goal and may stand his ground under tremendous opposition to his course of
action. This patience is an
attribute of selfishness, and is patience in a bad sense of the word. Patience in the good sense of this word
is an attribute of love. Patience
is a consistent quality that steadfastly bears up under trials, afflictions,
crosses, persecutions, or discouragements.
This must be an attribute of love.
Whenever patience ceases, when patience cannot hold out any longer, when
discouragement prevails and the will relinquishes its end, love ceases.
Patience, when it
comes from our will, leads to patience as an emotion. An intention that is steadfast and fixed
naturally tends to suppress impatience.
But because our emotions are not directly under the control of our will,
there may be irritable or impatient feelings even when our heart remains
steadfast. Facts or falsehoods may
be suggested to our mind, which may produce a ruffling of our emotions in spite
of our will, even when our heart remains patient. The only way we can eliminate a
temptation like this, is to draw our attention away from whatever created the
temptation. Our will does not
directly control our feelings.
Because of this, it often happens that those feelings that relate to our
will simply aren’t there. In fact,
we often experience emotions that are just the opposite of the state of our
will. We experience most of our
temptations when this situation exists.
Temptation would never be a serious problem if our feelings always
corresponded with the state of our will.
Sin consists in willing to gratify our feelings or our
constitutional impulses in opposition to the law of our reason. But if these desires and impulses never
existed in opposition to the law of our reason and in opposition to a present
holy choice, then a holy being could never be tempted. He would have no temptation or occasion
to sin. If our mother Eve never had
feelings of desire in opposition to the state of her will she never would have
desired the forbidden fruit, and, of course, would not have sinned.
I now want to clearly
say that exercising our will does not control our feelings, desires, or emotions
to the point that they can never be excited by Satan or by circumstances in
opposition to our will, and so they can become powerful temptations to seek
their gratification, instead of seeking the highest good of others. Feelings, the gratification of which
would be opposed to every attribute of love, may coexist with love at times and
be a temptation to sin; but opposing acts of will cannot exist within us at the
same time. All that we can say is,
that once our will has an indirect control over our feelings, desires,
appetites, passions, etc., our will can suppress feelings when they arise by
diverting our attention from their causes, or by taking into consideration views
and facts that will calm or change our feelings. Suppressing these feelings however, may
take a considerable amount of time.
Ill health, irritable nerves, or many things over which our will has no
direct control can easily cause irritable feelings or impatience. This is not a sinful
impatience. If these feelings
are not allowed to influence our will; if our will is patient; if such feelings
are not cherished, and are not allowed to shake the integrity of our will; they
are not sin. If our will does not
consent to those contrary feelings, there is no sin. They are only temptations. If those temptations are allowed to
control our will, if they are allowed to break forth in words and actions, then
there is sin; but the sin does not consist in our feelings, but in the consent
of our will to gratify them. Thus
the apostle says, “Be ye angry, and sin not: let not the sun go down on your
anger” (Eph. 4:26) That is, if
anger rises up within you, do not sin by allowing it to control your will. Do not cherish your anger, and don’t let
the sun go down on it. For
cherishing anger is sin. When one
cherishes any temptation, when your will consents and broods over the cause of
it, you are sinning. But, if you do
not cherish it, then no sin is committed.
Our
physical actions will correspond with the actions of our will, provided no
physical obstacle opposes them. But
the belief, that feelings and desires cannot exist contrary to the states or
decisions of our will, is not true.
If this was a universal truth, temptation could not exist. Our physical actions will always reflect
our will and they usually reflect our feelings. Feelings will usually correspond to
whatever our will chooses, but occasionally we will experience feelings that
oppose our willful choice. These
exceptions may and do exist in holy beings. They existed in Eve before she consented
to sin, and if she had resisted them she would have not sinned.
No doubt, they existed
in Christ, or He could not have been tempted in all points like we are. If there are no emotional desires or
impulses contrary to the state of our will, there can be no
temptations. We must first
become aware of the desire before it moves us to perform a sinful action, even
before there is a temptation to indulge selfishly. Just as surely as a holy being may be
tempted and not sin, so certainly emotions of any kind, or of any strength, may
exist in our soul without sin. If
we do not indulge in these emotions, if our will does not consent to gratify
them, we are no less virtuous by their presence. Patience that results from exercising
our will must strengthen and gird itself under such circumstances, so that it
exists in exact proportion to our impatience. The more impatience we have, the more
willful patience we need, or virtue will cease altogether. So, it is not always true that our
virtue is the strongest when our emotions are calm, placid, and patient. When Christ passed through His greatest
conflicts, His virtue as a man was undoubtedly the most intense. When He agonized in the garden, so great
was the anguish of His soul, that He sweat, as it were, great drops of
blood. This, He says, was the hour
of the prince of darkness. This was
His great trial. But did He
sin? No, indeed! Why? Was He calm and placid as a summer’s
evening? As far from it as
possible.
Patience, then, as an
attribute of love does not consist in placid feelings but in perseverance under
trials and emotional upheavals that normally lead to selfishness. This is only love under circumstances of
discouragement, of trial, or temptation.
“This is the patience of the saints” (Rev. 13:10)
Before I move on to
the next attribute of love, I would like to say that the steadfastness of
our heart tends so strongly to secure patience, that if an opposite emotional
state lasts for any significant length of time, then we can presume that our
heart is not steadfast in love. The
first feelings of opposition will produce an immediate effort to suppress
it. If the opposition continues,
this is evidence that we are allowing our attention to dwell on the cause of
that opposition. This shows that
our will is, to some degree, indulging in it.
If it goes so far as
to influence our will to manifest itself in impatient words and actions, there
must be a yielding of our will.
Once we yield our will, we loose our patience. If our emotions were perfectly and
directly under the control of our will, the least degree of impatience would
imply sin. But, since our feelings
are only indirectly under the control of our will, momentary impatience,
when it does not influence our will and when we do not indulge in it, does not
indicate a sinful state of our will.
Remember, that neither patience nor impatience, in the form of a mere
feeling, existing for any length of time and in any degree, is all by itself
either holy on the one hand or sinful on the other. All we can say about these emotional
states is that they generally indicate the attitude of our will. When our will is steadfast in its
patience for a long time, the result is great patience of feeling and
temper. In fact, many advanced
saints experience the most consistent patience year after year after year. This does not constitute their holiness,
but it is a sweet fruit of it. We
must regard patience as a reward of holiness, rather than holiness
itself.
P Another
attribute of love is Meekness.
Meekness,
when our will produces it, is a virtue.
This term also expresses an emotion. When meekness is an emotion, it is very
similar to patience. It is a sweet
and forbearing temper under provocation.
Willful meekness is the opposite of resistance to injury and
retaliation. It is forbearance
under harmful treatment. This
certainly is an attribute of God, as our existence and our being out of hell
clearly demonstrate. Christ said
that He was “meek and lowly in heart” (Matt. 11:29), and this surely was no vain
boast. How admirably, and how
continuously did this attribute of His love manifest itself! The fifty‑third chapter of Isaiah is a
prophecy that exhibits this attribute in a most affecting light. Indeed, hardly any feature of the
character of God and of Christ is more strikingly demonstrated than this. It is obviously an attribute of
love. Love is good will to all
beings. We are naturally meek
toward those whose good we honestly and diligently seek. If our hearts are determined to do them
good, we will naturally exercise a lot of meekness towards them. God has greatly demonstrated His
meekness for us, in that while we were His enemies, rather than punish us; He
gave His Son to die for us.
Meekness is a sweet and amiable attribute. It effectively displayed itself in the
hall of Pilate as well as on the cross.
“He was led as a lamb to the slaughter, and as a sheep before its
shearers is silent, so He opened not his mouth.” (Isaiah 53:7)
This attribute has
many opportunities in this world to develop and display itself in the
saints. There are daily occasions
for the exercise of this form of virtue.
Indeed, we need to exercise all the attributes of love in this school of
discipline here on earth. This is
indeed a suitable world in which to train God’s children, to develop and
strengthen every form of holiness.
This attribute must always appear where love exists and wherever there is
an opportunity to exercise it.
It is
delightful to contemplate the perfection and glory of that love that constitutes
obedience to God’s law. As
situations arise, we see love developing one attribute after another, and many
attributes and forms of love may exist that we don’t even know about yet. These will manifest under special
circumstances. I believe that the
attributes of love were very imperfectly known in heaven before sin existed in
the universe, and that if it weren’t for sin, the universe would not have seen
many of these attributes. But, the
existence of sin, great as the evil is, has provided an opportunity for love to
manifest its beautiful phases and to develop its sweet attributes in a most
enchanting manner. Thus, the divine
economy of love brings good out of so much evil.
A hasty and aggressive
spirit always demonstrates a lack of love or true religion. Meekness is, and must be, a peculiar
characteristic of the saints in this world where there is so much
aggression. Christ frequently and
strongly enforced the obligation to be meek. “But I tell you not to resist an evil
person. But whoever slaps you on
your right cheek; turn the other to him also. If anyone wants to sue you and take away
your tunic, let him have your cloak also.
And whoever compels you to go one mile, go with him two” (Matt.
5:41) How beautiful!
Q
Humility
is another form or attribute of love.
This
word is often used to express a sense of unworthiness, of guilt, of ignorance,
and of nothingness, to express a feeling of ill‑desert. People commonly use the word humility to
express the condition of our mind when we are clearly aware of our guilt. When used to designate an emotion,
humility represents those feelings of shame and unworthiness, of ignorance, and
of nothingness. These feelings
seem the strongest when the Holy Spirit reveals our true character to us.
As a willful attribute
of love, humility consists in a willing to let others know and appreciate us
according to our real character.
Humility, as a feeling, may coexist with great pride of heart. Pride is a desire to exalt self, to rise
above others, to hide our defects, and to pass for more than what we are. Deep conviction of sin, deep feelings of
shame, and of ignorance, and even the feeling that we deserve hell, may coexist
with a strong unwillingness to confess and let others see us just as we are, and
to allow others to be appreciated according to our real character. There is no virtue in this type of
humility. However, virtuous
humility consists in our willful consent to let others know us; to confess, and
to take our proper place in the scale of everything that exists. It is that peculiar aspect of love that
wills the good of others so unselfishly, that we are not willing to pretend to
be anyone other than who we are.
This is an honest, a sweet, and a pleasant feature of love. It seems to be peculiar to those who
have sinned. This attribute renders
confession of sin to God and man natural, and even makes it a luxury. It is easy to see that if it wasn’t for
this attribute, the saints could not be happy in heaven. God has promised to judge every work and
every secret thing whether it is good or whether it is evil. Now as long pride exists, that person
doesn’t really want to have his character revealed, so unless humility really is
an attribute that belongs to the saints, they will be ashamed at the judgment,
and filled with confusion even in heaven itself. But this sweet attribute will secure
them against that shame and confusion of face that would otherwise turn heaven
itself into a hell for them. They
will be perfectly willing and happy to be known and estimated according to their
true characters. This attribute
will secure in all the saints on earth that confession of faults one to another,
which is so often commanded in the Bible.
This does not mean that Christians will always think that it is wise and
necessary to confess all their secret sins to each other. But it does mean that they will confess
to those whom they have injured and to all whom love demands that they should
confess. This attribute secures the
one who possesses it against spiritual pride, against ambition to get above
others. It is a modest and
unassuming state of mind.
R
Self‑denial
is another attribute of love.
If we
love anyone more than ourselves, we of course deny ourselves when our own
interests come in competition with his.
Love is goodwill. If I will
good to others more than to myself, it is absurd to say that I will not deny
myself when my own preferences conflict with their good. Now the love required by the law of God
is good will, or willing the highest good of others for its own sake, or as an
end. Since self-interests are not
regarded because they belong to self, but because of their relative importance,
self‑denial for the sake of promoting the higher interests of God and of the
universe must be an attribute of love.
The
very idea of unselfish love implies abandoning the spirit of selfishness. It is impossible to become filled with
love without ceasing to be selfish.
In other words, perfect self‑denial is implied in being filled with
love. Self‑indulgence ends where
true love begins. This must
be. Love consecrates all of our
powers to the highest good of others as a goal. This is completely inconsistent with
consecrating ourselves to self‑gratification. Selfishness makes good to self the end
of every choice. Unselfish love
makes good for others the end of every choice. True love, then, implies complete
self‑denial. That is, it implies
that we never choose something simply because it belongs to self, but only
because of its importance to God and our neighbor.
I said the only true
love is unselfish love. Selfish
love occurs when we will the good of others as a means of our own happiness, or
because of its importance to us.
Thus, a man might will the good of his family, or of his neighborhood, or
country, or of anyone that has such a relationship to him that it directly
affect his own interests. When his
ultimate reason why he wills good to others is because he wants to promote his
own interests, this is selfishness.
It is making good to self his goal.
A sinner may love God this way.
He may love to be active in the church, and promote the interests of
religion in general. Selfish love
motivates him. He is willing good
only for himself, and good to others only as a means of promoting his own
good.
When our feelings
govern our will and directs the good that we do for others, this is a selfish
love. For example: let’s say that
the presence of a blind beggar in misery stirs up my feeling of compassion. This feeling becomes so intense, and
produces such a strong emotion that my will consents to gratify my emotion. For the time being, this emotion becomes
stronger than any other feeling. I
yield to it, giving all the money I have in my wallet to relieve the
sufferer. I even take my shirt off
and give it to him. Now, in this
situation, I am just as selfish as if I had spent my money to gratify my
appetite for alcohol. Gratifying my
feelings was the reason why I did what I did. This is one of the subtlest and the most
deceptive forms of selfishness.
When
one makes his own salvation the reason for praying, for tithing, or the reason
for all his religious duties, this is selfishness. It is not true religion; no matter how
much effort he might exert doing these things. This is only selfish love.
From the very nature
of true love, it is impossible that we should not regard every interest
according to its relative importance.
When I see that another interest is more important to God and the
universe than my own interest, and when I see that, by denying myself, I can
promote that interest, it is certain that, if I truly love God, I will do
it. I cannot fail to do it without
failing love God with all my heart.
Therefore, the unselfish man will honestly weigh each interest in the
balance of his own best judgment, and he will always prefer the more important
interest, provided he believes that he can reasonably secure it by his efforts,
and by his self‑denial.
That self‑denial
is an attribute of Divine love, is seen in God’s gift of His Son to die for
us. Christ also manifested this
attribute when He denied Himself and took up His cross and suffered for His
enemies. It was not for His friends
that Christ gave Himself. It was
not for unfortunate nor innocent sufferers that God gave His Son. It was for His enemies. It’s not so God could make slaves of
sinners that He gave His Son, nor did God give His Son because of any selfish
consideration whatsoever, but because God saw ahead of time that by making this
sacrifice Himself, He could secure for the universe a greater good than His
sacrifice. Self-denial caused God
to give His Son to suffer so much.
Total unselfish love alone led Him to deny Himself for the sake of a
greater good to the universe. Now
Christ would not have made this sacrifice unless God felt that it was the lesser
of two natural evils. That is, God
considered that the sufferings of Christ, great and overwhelming as they were,
were a lesser evil than the eternal sufferings of the entire human race. This influenced Him to make the
sacrifice for His enemies. It did
not matter whether it was for friends or for enemies, if He could have, He would
have made a less sacrifice to secure a greater good to them.
Remember, that a
self‑indulgent spirit is never consistent with true love. No form of self‑indulgence can exist
where true love exists. The fact
is, self‑denial must exist wherever love reigns. Christ has clearly made wholehearted
self‑denial a condition of discipleship; which is the same thing as saying that
self-denial is an essential attribute of holiness or love; and you cannot even
begin to have true virtue without it.
A lot
that looks likes self‑denial is only a disguised form of
self‑indulgence. The penances
and the self‑mortifications of the superstitious are nothing but manifestations
of a spirit of self‑indulgence. A
priest abstains from marriage to obtain the honor and the influence of his
priestly duties here, and eternal glory hereafter. A nun takes the veil and a monk hides
himself in a monastery; a hermit forsakes human society, and shuts himself up in
a cave; an ascetic makes a pilgrimage to Mecca, and a martyr goes to the
stake. Now if these people do these
things for their own selfish glory and happiness, even though they appear to be
examples of great self‑denial, they are really, only manifestations of a spirit
of self‑indulgence and self‑seeking.
They are only following their strongest selfish desire.
There are many errors
on this subject. For example: it is
common for people to deny self in one form for the sake of gratifying self in
another form. Let’s say that, in
one man, greed is his ruling passion.
He labors hard, rises early, stays up late, eats the bread of
carefulness, and denies himself even the basic necessities of life for the sake
of accumulating wealth. Everyone
can see, that he is denying himself certain ways merely so he can gratify
himself in other ways. Yet, this
man will complain bitterly about the self‑indulgent spirit that others
manifested. He will complain about
their extravagance and lack of piety.
One man will deny all his bodily appetites and passions for the sake of
his reputation with his friends.
Another will sacrifice his earthly pleasures to obtain an eternal
inheritance and be just as selfish as the man who sacrifices his soul and all
the riches of eternity for the things of this world.
Now, unselfish
self-denial must suppress all the other preferences of our soul. True self-denial must suddenly or
gradually, completely subdue and quiet every other preference that we have. Our selfish desires will suddenly or
gradually be slain to the point that our emotion will become basically dead to
those objects that so often and so easily excited it. It is a law of every desire and passion,
that indulging in our emotions develops and strengthens them, and denying our
emotions suppresses them. True love
consists in refusing to gratify those feelings, and obeying our reason
instead. Therefore, it must be true
that denying our emotions will suppress them; while indulging in our emotions
will develop them. Thus,
selfishness tends to weaken our mind while true love tends to strengthen our
mind.
S Condescension
is another attribute of love.
This
attribute consists in a tendency to descend to the poor, the ignorant, or the
vile to secure their good. It is a
tendency to seek the good of those whom providence has placed below us, by
stooping, by descending, by coming down to them for their benefit. It is a peculiar form of
self‑denial. God the Father, the
Son, and the Holy Spirit, display infinite condescension in efforts to secure
the good of sinners, even the most vile and degraded sinners. Christ calls this attribute, lowliness
of heart. God is said to humble
Himself, that is, to condescend when He beholds the things that are done in
heaven. This is true, for every
creature is and must forever be infinitely below Him in every respect. But that condescension that comes down
to earth, even to the lowest and most degraded of earth’s inhabitants, out of
love for them, must be infinitely great!
This is a precious form of love.
Most
people, especially infidels, seem to regard condescension as more of a weakness
than a virtue. Skeptics clothe
their imaginary God with attributes that are often the opposite of true
virtue. They think it is completely
beneath the dignity of God to come down, even to notice mankind, let alone to
interfere with their concerns. But
hear the word of the Lord: “For thus says the High and Lofty One Who inhabits
eternity, whose name is Holy: ‘I dwell in the high and holy place, with him who
has a contrite and humble spirit, to revive the spirit of the humble, and to
revive the heart of the contrite ones’” (Isaiah 57:15) And again, “Thus says the Lord: ‘Heaven
is My throne, and earth is my footstool.
Where is the house that you will build Me? And where is the place of My rest? For all those things My hand has made,
and all those things exist,’ says the Lord. ‘But on this one will I look: on him who
is poor and of a contrite spirit, and who trembles at My word.’” (Isaiah 66:1‑2) Thus, the Bible represents God as
clothed with condescension as with a cloak.
Condensation is not
only an attribute of love but also an attribute of true greatness. The natural perfections of God appear
even more wonderful when we consider that He knows, thinks about, leads, and
guides, not only the highest, but also the lowest of all His creatures; that He
is just as able to attend to every need of every creature as if this is the only
thing on His mind. So His moral
attributes appear even more lovely and engaging when we consider that His
“tender mercies are over all His works” (Psalms 145:9), “that not a sparrow
falls to the ground without Him”
(Matt. 10:29), that He condescends to number the very hairs of the heads
of His servants and that not one of them can fall without Him. When we consider that no creature is too
low, too filthy, or too degraded for Him to condescend to, this places His
character in a most wonderful light.
Love is good will to all living beings. Of course, one of the characteristics of
love must be condescension to those who are below us. Condescension in God is infinite. He is infinitely above all
creatures. For Him to hold
communion with His creatures is infinite condescension.
You can find this
attribute in everyone who loves God with all his or her heart. With the lowest moral beings, it may
only develop in their relationships to living creatures below the rank of moral
agents, because there are simply no moral agents below them to whom they can
stoop. God’s condescension
stoops to all ranks of created beings. This is also true with every one who
loves God and their neighbor with all their hearts. Condensation seeks the good of others in
general, and never thinks that any one is too low to minister to and cared for
according to their relative importance.
Love cannot possibly keep its own essential nature, and yet be above any
degree of condescension that can produce the greatest good. True love does not, and cannot know
anything about that lofty spirit that considers it too degrading to stoop
anywhere, or to any being whose interests need to be promoted by such
condescension. Love has its goal,
and it must seek that goal, and it cannot think that anything, that is demanded
to secure that goal, is below it.
The
shame, the infinite folly and madness of pride, and every form of
selfishness! How infinitely unlike
God it is! Christ could condescend
to be born in a manger; to be brought up in a humble life; to be poorer than the
fox of the desert, or the fowls of heaven; to associate with fishermen; to
mingle with and seek the good of all kinds of people; to be despised in life,
and die between two thieves on the cross.
His love “endured the cross and despised the shame” (Heb. 12:2) He was “meek and lowly in heart” (Matt.
11:29) The Lord of heaven and earth
is as much more lowly in heart than any of His creatures as he is above them in
His infinity. He can stoop to
anything but to commit sin. He can
stoop infinitely low.
T Stability
is another attribute of love.
True love is not a mere feeling or an emotion that
effervesces for a moment and then it cools down and disappears. Nor is it simply a willful act that
accomplishes its object and then rests.
Love is choosing an end, a supreme end. It is an intelligent choice - the most
intelligent choice that you can make.
It is a considerate choice, a deliberate choice, and a reasonable choice,
which will always commend itself to the highest perceptions of the mind. It is intelligent and impartial, because
it is completely consecrating your self to the highest goal in the
universe. It is the most important
and it is captivating in its influence.
Now, stability must be a characteristic of such a choice as this. By stability, I do not mean that we may
not change our choice, or that our decision has never changed, but when we
consider the attributes of this choice, it appears as if stability, as opposed
to instability, must be an attribute of this choice. It is a new birth, a new nature, a new
creature, a new heart, a new life.
These things and many things just like these are represented throughout
scripture. Do these things
represent an unstable, temporary state?
The beginning of unselfish love within us is represented as the death of
sin, as a burial, being planted, a crucifixion of the old man, and many similar
things. Do these things describe
what we so often see among professing Christians today? The nature of the change itself would
seem to be a guarantee that it is stable.
We might reasonably suppose that we would abandon any other choice before
we would abandon this choice; that any other state of mind would fail sooner
than love. It is useless to reply
to those who claim that the facts prove that the opposite is true. I say, what facts? Who can prove that they are facts? Shall we appeal to the instability of
many people who claim to be Christians; or shall we appeal to the very nature of
the choice and to the scriptures?
No doubt, we must appeal to the very nature of the choice as well as the
scriptures. As far as philosophy
goes, we might defy the world to produce an instance of choice that has so many
chances for stability. Scripture is
filled with passages proclaiming stability. What then shall we say about those
unstable, so called ‘Christians’ who are soon hot and soon cold; whose religion
constantly fluctuates; “whose goodness is as the morning cloud and the early
dew, which goes away?” (Hosea
6:4) We must conclude that they
never had the root of true love in them.
We can see that they are not dead to sin and to the world. We can see that they are not new
creatures, that they do not have the spirit of Christ, that they do not keep His
commandments. What then shall we
conclude? That they are
stony‑ground hearers!
U
Holiness
is another attribute of true love.
The Bible uses this word to mean the same as moral purity. In a ceremonial sense, the Bible applies
holiness to both people and things.
To make holy and to sanctify mean the same thing. To sanctify and to consecrate, or set
apart for sacred use, are identical.
Many things were in this sense, sanctified, or made holy, under the
Jewish economy. We can apply the
word holiness to anything that is set apart for a sacred use. It especially applies to one who is set
apart for God’s service.
As an attribute of
love, holiness denotes that quality which tends to seek to promote our happiness
when we conform to moral law. As a
moral attribute of God, holiness is that attribute of His love that secures
happiness against all efforts to obtain it by any other means than those means
that are morally and perfectly pure.
God’s love aims to make sure our happiness by means of moral law and
moral government, and to make sure we conform to His own subjective idea of
right. In other words, holiness in
God is that quality of His love that makes sure we conform, in all our efforts
and manifestations, to God’s Divine idea of right. Sometimes, we use holiness to express
the moral character of the Godhead.
It sometimes seems to designate an attribute and sometimes a quality of
His moral attributes. There is no
doubt that holiness is a characteristic or a quality of each and all of His
moral attributes. All of God’s
moral attributes will harmonize in holiness, that not one of them can consent to
do anything else than conform to the law of moral purity, as revealed in the
Divine Reason.
That holiness is an
attribute of God is everywhere assumed, and frequently mentioned in the
Bible. If holiness is an attribute
of God, it must be an attribute of love; for God is love. Holiness is celebrated in heaven as one
of those aspects of God’s Divine character that gives indescribable
delight. Isaiah saw the seraphim
standing around the throne of Jehovah, and crying one to another, “Holy! Holy! Holy!” (Isaiah 6:3) John also had a vision of worship of
heaven, and says, “They rest not day nor night, saying, Holy! Holy! Holy! Lord God Almighty” (Rev. 4:8) When Isaiah beheld the holiness of
Jehovah, he cried out “Woe is me! I
am undone. I am a man of unclean
lips, and I dwell in the midst of a people of unclean lips; for my eyes have
seen the King, the Lord of hosts!”
(Isaiah 6:5) God’s holiness
is infinite, and it is no wonder that a glimpse of it should affect the prophet
this way.
Finite holiness must
forever feel awed in the presence of infinite holiness. Job says, “I have heard of You by the
hearing of the ear, but now my eye sees You. Therefore I abhor myself, and repent in
dust and ashes” (Job 42:5-6) There
is no comparing the finite with the infinite. The time will never come when creatures
can contemplate, with open face, the infinite holiness of Jehovah without being
like people overcome with a harmony too intensely delightful to be calmly
borne. Heaven is not able to endure
it without breaking forth into strains of inexpressible rapture.
The statements of
Isaiah and Job don’t necessarily imply that at the time, they were in a sinful
state, but their statements do reveal the fact that they had been guilty of past
sins. In the light of Jehovah’s
holiness, they saw the comparative pollution of their whole character. This view will always deeply affect the
saints. This must be; and yet, in
another sense, they are as holy in their measure as He is. They may be as perfectly conformed to
what light or truth they have, as God is.
This is what Christ intended when He said, “Therefore you shall be
perfect, just as your Father in heaven is perfect”. (Matt. 5:48) The meaning is, that they should live
for the same goal and consecrate themselves to that same goal just like He
is. This is what they must do to be
truly virtuous or holy in any degree.
But even when they conform to the light that God gives them, a full view
of God’s holiness would still amaze and overwhelm them. If anyone doubts this, he has not
properly thought about it. He has
not lifted up his thoughts, as he needs to do to contemplate infinite
holiness. No creature, no matter
how much they love God or their neighbor, can see God’s Divine love without
being overwhelmed with a clear vision of it. This is also true of every attribute of
God’s Divine love. No matter how
perfect our virtue may be, it is only finite, and when you bring your measure of
virtue into the light of the attributes of infinite virtue it will appear like
the dimmest star in the presence of the sun, lost in the blaze of God’s
glory. Let the most righteous man
on earth, or in heaven, see and have a clear understanding of the infinite
justice of Jehovah and it would no doubt fill him with unutterable awe. In the same way, if the most merciful
saint on earth, or in heaven, could clearly see God’s Divine mercy in its
fullness, it would swallow up all thought and imagination, and no doubt, it
would overwhelm him. This is also
true of every attribute of God.
Oh! When we speak of the
attributes of Jehovah, we often do not know what we are talking about. If God completely revealed Himself to
us, our bodies would instantly perish “No man”, says He, “can see My face and
live” (Exodus 33:20) When Moses
prayed, “Show me Your glory” (Exodus 33:18) God hid him in the cleft of a rock, and
covered him with His hand. He
passed by, and let Moses see only His back parts, informing him that he could
not behold His face, that is, His unveiled glories, and live.
So holiness is an
essential attribute of unselfish love.
This must be true from the way God created the universe, and from the
very nature of love. In us,
holiness manifests itself in beautifully pure of conversations and manners, in a
powerful hatred for all fleshly and spiritual impurities. Let us not claim to have piety if we do
not have holiness. The love
required by the law of God is pure love.
It seeks to make us happy only by making us holy. Love manifests the greatest dislike of
sin and all uncleanness. In
creatures, love longs for holiness.
It will never find a resting place, in such a sense, that it no longer
desires to ascend any higher. As
love sees more and more of the fullness and infinity of God’s holiness, it will
no doubt yearn and struggle to ascend to the eternal heights where God sits in
light too intense for the strongest vision of the highest cherub.
Holiness of heart
produces a desire for purity in our soul.
Our feelings become alive to the beauty of holiness and to the
hatefulness of all spiritual impurity.
This is called the love of holiness. Our emotion becomes ravished with the
great loveliness of holiness, and it becomes disgusted with the opposite. The least impure conversation or impure
action quickly shocks one who is holy.
Impure thoughts, if suggested to the mind of a holy being, instantly feel
highly offensive and painful. The
soul heaves and struggles to cast those impure thoughts out as very disgusting
abominations.