If
solid wastes are not managed properly, there are many negative impacts that may
result. Some of the most important are mentioned in the following list. The
relative importance of each depends very much on local conditions.
There
are many factors that vary from place to place and that must be considered in
the design of a solid waste management system. Amongst them are:
There
are several important consequences of this density factor. Perhaps the main one
is that containers, vehicles and systems that operate well with low-density
wastes in industrialized countries are not suitable or reliable when the wastes
are heavy. The combination of the extra weight, the abrasiveness of the sand
and the corrosiveness caused by the water content, can cause very rapid
deterioration of equipment.
Another
important consideration is the possibility of incinerating the waste (meaning,
the burning of waste under controlled conditions to minimize pollution). If the
waste contains a high proportion of moisture, or is mostly inert material, it
is not suitable for incineration, and so this treatment option is ruled out.
Recycling or salvaging operations often reduce the proportion of combustible
paper and plastic in waste before it reaches the treatment stage.
Resource
recovery means the obtaining of some economic benefit from material that
someone has regarded as waste. It includes
Some
key factors that affect the potential for resource recovery are the cost of the
separated material, its purity, its quantity and its location. The costs of
storage and transport are major factors that decide the economic potential for
resource recovery. In many low-income countries, the fraction of material that
is won for resource recovery is very high, because this work is done in a very
labor-intensive way, and for very low incomes. In such situations the creation
of employment is the main economic benefit of resource recovery. The situation
in industrialized countries is very different, since resource recovery is
undertaken by the formal sector, driven by law and a general public concern for
the environment, and often at considerable expense.
Composting
is an excellent method of recycling biodegradable waste from an ecological
point of view. However, many large and small composting schemes have failed
because composting is regarded as a disposal process, and not a production
process. It is essential - as in any production process - to pay careful
attention to the marketing and the quality of the product. Composting should be
an activity of the agricultural sector, not the waste management sector.
It can
be a big mistake to try to impose on low-income countries the methods of
recycling that are used in industrialized countries.
It
appears that in most low-income countries, and many medium income countries,
very little progress has been made in upgrading waste disposal operations. Open
dumps, where the waste is unloaded in piles, make very uneconomical use of the
available space, allow free access to waste pickers, animals and flies and
often produce unpleasant and hazardous smoke from slow-burning fires.
A
sanitary landfill is a site where solid wastes are placed on or in the ground
at a carefully selected location by means of engineering techniques that
minimize pollution of air, water and soil, and other risks to man and animals.
Aesthetic considerations are also taken into account. (For more information see
Rush brook and Pugh, 1999.)
In some
major cities loans or grants have been used to construct sanitary landfills on
sites that have been carefully chosen, but usually little attention is paid to
the training of a site manager and to the provision of sufficient financial and
physical resources to allow a reasonable standard of operation. As a result,
some sites quickly degenerate into open dumps. It is crucial to good operations
to have a motivated and trained site manager. It is recommended that the
training for this position should include practical experience on well-run
sites.
Most
sanitary landfill designs attach considerable importance to preventing polluted
water (leachate) from escaping from the site. It has been shown that large
quantities of leachate can be produced by landfills, even in semi-arid
climates. (Scheu, 2001) Most designs include expensive and carefully
constructed impermeable layers, which prevent leachate moving downwards into
the ground and drainage systems to bring the leachate to a treatment plant or a
storage tank. However, if the tank is not emptied before it overflows, or if
the plant is not working, the leachate control system actually makes the
pollution worse than from an open dump, because all the leachate is
concentrated in one place, giving natural purification systems very little
chance of reducing the pollution impact. This example shows that good design
and construction can achieve nothing if they are not followed by good operation.
Healthcare
wastes are generated as a result of activities related to the practice of
medicine (including veterinary medicine and dentistry). Often this term is used
to refer only to solid wastes (i.e. not to wastewater). Some of the healthcare
wastes coming from any particular hospital or institution are similar in nature
to domestic solid wastes, and may be called “general healthcare wastes”. The
remaining wastes pose serious health hazards because of their physical, chemical
or biological nature, and so are known as “hazardous healthcare wastes” or
“healthcare risk wastes”. Wastes, which are particularly offensive because of
their appearance or smell, may also be classed with the hazardous wastes.
Healthcare
wastes have attracted considerable attention because of the emotional impact of
seeing body parts amidst solid waste, and because of the increasing concern
about AIDS and hepatitis. In many cases the most dangerous items in healthcare
wastes are needles from syringes and drips, because the needles shield the
viruses from chemical disinfectants and a harsh external environment, and the
sharp point allows easy access for the viruses into the blood stream of anyone
who is pricked by the needle.
Many
attempts to upgrade healthcare waste management rely solely on the provision of
incinerators or other treatment technologies. Such a strategy has several
weaknesses in that
Some
waste materials need special care because their properties make them more
hazardous or problematic than general wastes. Used oil can be refined for reuse
or burned in properly equipped furnaces. Slaughterhouse wastes should be buried
in special trenches at suitable sites. Car tires should be reused as much as
possible, and carefully protected from open burning. Chemical wastes from some
industries (including tanning, dry-cleaning, photographic processing and many
chemical production industries) and unwanted pesticides and other agricultural
chemicals should be collected under close supervision and treated in
appropriate ways. The management of hazardous chemicals is not only a matter of
technology and legislation, but also of enforcement, funding and financial
instruments. Some wastes are so hazardous and expensive to treat that priority
attention should be focused on changing to processes that use substitutes that
are less hazardous, and to minimizing the quantities that are discarded.
Indeed, minimization and substitution should be seen as the preferred options
in dealing with any difficult waste.
The
Basel Convention seeks to control the movement of hazardous wastes across
international boundaries. This instrument is necessary because the high cost of
treating hazardous wastes in industrialized countries makes it financially
attractive to ship the wastes to another country where no special requirements
for their disposal will be applied.