That preceding article may, at first, strike a few as being an argument for the untenable position of Absolute Skepticism - the belief that, in principle, we can't know anything at all or even have a justifiable level of belief any greater than that of total uncertainty. After all, if we can't prove our fundamental assumptions, then what is the basis for our confidence in their validity? From this conclusion, as a corollary, would come a severe form of moral relativism - the absolute denial of the possibility of knowing right from wrong.
But such will not prove to be the case.
As we see in this next article, there is somewhat less to what we found than may meet the eyes of some. In fact, a simple understanding of the nature of language dispells this illusory difficulty.
What's your pleasure?