From: (Editor's name deleted) ... Number: 70740
To: Antistoicus Date: 4/12/01 2:56 PM
Subject: Message not approved: The Council for Pagan Liberty and Interfaith Coo
Reference: None
Read: 4/12/01 3:31 PM Private: Yes

Antistoicus:
Your message was not lost in the queue, they were pending approval, and I am sorry, but I am not approving this one, or the duplicate sent today.

If this offends you , I truly am very sorry, but I have read these and the past several weeks worth of posts and I don't see that these are adding anything, but simply bringing up things that have already been brought up. When they are, it seems to incite other members of the list. We are all familiar with your side and Frank's. Please, could we let this rest on this list?

Again, I am sorry, I don't like this role, but then again, it seems that on this list it is necessary from time to time.

(name deleted)

>
>
>
>
> ... I've mentioned the Council for Pagan Liberty and Interfaith
> ... Cooperation, an online networking group that I was trying to
> ... give an offline presence to. It was described as a Pagan
> ... writers/networking group. This has lead, in the past, to the
> ... criticism (by Frank) that the concept behind the group was
> ... an unfocused one. He went on to insist that I had to decide
> ... whether I wanted to run a newsletter, or a networking
> ... organization.
>
> ... As we shall see in this article from the old Council website,
> ... Frank was missing the point. The two functions weren't
> ... distractions from each other, but rather, one was an
> ... expression of the other.
>
> ... The letter you see below appeared on the combined
> ... Shrine/Council mailing list, which Sally, Harriet and
> ... Ellen had signed up for at the Con.
>
>

---

* essay deleted *


Click here to return.