Australian Men's Newspaper

 

I don't know about you but I am getting pretty sick to death about how men are being treated in Australia. They always make us look bad on tv, in the newspapers and in commercials while they always make women look the opposite. Do think this is right ?

you can trust me honey.

Did you know that the New D.V. laws passed by the state governments makes it possible for you to be jailed for not allowing your female partner to go shopping?

shopping

Did you know that after having sex the night before and if she feels bad about it, she could have you charged with rape and have you thrown in jail with no defence or questions asked ?

ring for money

Did you know that she can take all you have, that is your car, your house, your kids, your bank account if she makes one phone call to the police if she even thinks you may do something. She does not have to prove it, you have to dis-prove it. Your are guilty already. You will be put in jail and given a court order to not go anywhere near your own house or your kids or your bank account.

The New Marriage Con-tract.

"A woman can, at any time,
dismiss her male partner, without justification, and have that partner imprisoned if he objects too strongly to his dismissal.

For example, if he raises his voice in anger he may be arrested for 'domestic violence'.

In any event, a woman can dismiss the man regardless of the circumstances, and at her sole discretion.

She can fire him from his jobs as father and partner, whenever she wishes, no matter how long he has served the family, and even if he has done absolutely nothing wrong.

Further, the woman can insist that the man is evicted from his own house, and never allowed to re-enter it.

She can make him homeless knowing there are no services to help him.

If she has children, a woman may further demand that her sacked partner must, under threat of imprisonment, forfeit part of any future income to the woman and her children for some considerable time into the future - and this is the case even if her children turn out not to be his."


The new Aussie athletes. You can always tell them from normal women as they have  advanced muscle structure. Determine for yourself, these girls are one of Queensland's football clubs cheers squad and the current body wants them to cover up their middle section.

Men's movement is coming.

The New Marriage Con-tract.

"A woman can, at any time,
dismiss her male partner, without justification, and have that partner imprisoned if he objects too strongly to his dismissal.

For example, if he raises his voice in anger he may be arrested for 'domestic violence'.

In any event, a woman can dismiss the man regardless of the circumstances, and at her sole discretion.

She can fire him from his jobs as father and partner, whenever she wishes, no matter how long he has served the family, and even if he has done absolutely nothing wrong.

Further, the woman can insist that the man is evicted from his own house, and never allowed to re-enter it.

She can make him homeless knowing there are no services to help him.

If she has children, a woman may further demand that her sacked partner must, under threat of imprisonment, forfeit part of any future income to the woman and her children for some considerable time into the future - and this is the case even if her children turn out not to be his."


tv sucks

Office for Women gives away your hard-earned money.

But to women only ofcourse, if your a female you can get payments of up to $ 50,000 for free. All you have to do is spent it on something for women. While we are working hard our taxes go to the O.F.W. they are allocated 3 Billion Dollars($3,000,000,000) every year just for women. And Men cannot even get a tax break, cannot even get a single dollar in funding for prostate cancer that kills 6 Good Men every day.!

It is totally unfair, women are catered for to their every whim and men die like flies and no-one gives a damn. Fathers, Grandfathers, Uncles and Brothers all dying due to total lack of funding for our health problems.

MGTOW

This is the MGTOW logo and it's for "Men Going Their Own Way". This is the new option for all men as women are becoming too self-centered and way too self-possessed by their own importance. Watch of for it on the web.

percent

 

Child Support Gold Diggers

April 05, 2006

 By Carey Roberts

Laws that protect the fairer sex from rape, domestic violence, and sexual harassment all rest on a simple assumption: women who claim to be victims are almost always telling the truth. Maybe it’s time to revisit that belief. Three weeks ago the National Center for Men filed a lawsuit on behalf of Matt Dubay, 25, who claims his girlfriend repeatedly assured him that she was unable to get pregnant. When she later bore a child, the state of Michigan went after Mr. Dubay for child support. 

That’s what people used to call entrapment.

Feminists are killing our schools.

ONE of the world's leading authorities on Shakespeare's work, Harold Bloom, and the nation's pre-eminent poet, Les Murray, have declared literary study in Australia dead after learning that a prestigious Sydney school asked students to interpret Othello from Marxist, feminist and racial perspectives.

"I find the question sublimely stupid," Professor Bloom, an internationally renowned literary critic, the Sterling Professor of Humanities at Yale and Berg Professor of English at New York University, said yesterday.

"It is another indication that literary study has died in Australia."

Boys are lagging way behind and no-one give a damn. If it was females it would be different.


My Wife is a sex object. Every time I want sex, She objects.


Good advice to Ugandan Men may also apply here !

Avoid Aussie women, Ugandan team told
The Age, March 8, 2006 - 12:47PM

"Keep away from the Australian women or else you will end up in prisons like the Ugandan swimmer during the Sydney 2000 Olympic Games," Mugabo, director of the Ugandan ministry of education and sports, told departing athletes.


Women became, de facto, a class of victims, sufferers under the Evil Patriarchy. (The first victim class in history that outlives and outspends their "oppressors...")

 

just a bitch

 

The scary part is that we could be so easily hoodwinked. After all, what is wrong with trying to make sure that everyone feels good, with trying to make sure that people aren't mean to one another? I mean, that's a good idea, right? The problem is that certain facets of society have attempted to legislate morality instead of teaching it. By legislating correct behavior instead of teaching it as the right thing to do, not only have we lost our moral compass and the ability to know inherently what is good and what is evil, we have abdicated our personal responsibility to the state, becoming - in effect - all wards of the state.


Women are just as violent as their partners....That women are victims is just another feminist lie. After all feminist are compulsive liars.


Woman charged in granddaughter's death

Woman charged with recklessly exposing others to HIV

Woman charged with punching paramedic

Downstate woman charged in adoption scam

Woman Charged With Obtaining Alcohol For Minors

Woman charged after fatal meth lab blast

Woman charged with arson in Tremont St. fire

Journalist's criticism of Stern spurs threats; woman charged

Woman charged with embezzlement from housing authority

Woman charged in St. Albert man's death

Woman Charged With Worcester Boy's Death

Woman charged with shoplifting from mall

25-Year-Old Woman Charged With Murder

Woman charged in knife attack

Lansdale woman charged in arson death held over for trial

Woman charged with smuggling human head

Lafayette woman charged in 2004 Mississippi slaying

Woman charged with involuntary manslaughter in death of 6-year-old ...

Pregnant woman charged with neglect

Woman charged with sexual assault

Women are not the harmless creatures we have been led to believe.

ARE WOMEN AND MEN EQUALLY VIOLENT?*

Bruce Headey Dorothy Scott David de Vaus
University of Melbourne University of Melbourne La Trobe University

To sum up:
(1) Men were just as likely to report being physically assaulted by their
partners as women. Further, women and men were about equally likely to
admit being violent themselves.
(2) Men and women report experiencing about the same levels of pain and
need for medical attention resulting from domestic violence.
(3) Violence runs in couples. In over 50% of partnerships in which violence
occurred both partners struck each other.
(4) People who had violent parents were significantly more likely than others
to be violent to their own partners and to be victims of violence
themselves. On the other hand, a huge majority of people whose parents
were violent do not assault their own partners. Moreover, the vast majority
of those who are violent did not have violent parents.
The first two results run counter to conventional wisdom and to the hypotheses with
which we began the paper. However, some degree of confirmation or at least plausibility
derives from the fact that men’s and women’s reports on rates of domestic violence more
or less agree. If the women are to be believed (as they have been by previous
investigators), then so are the men. Further, the results relating to women being as violent
as men are in line with some recent American research.
Of course it takes more than one survey to overturn received wisdom. It is fair to ask
researchers how much confidence they have in their own findings. We are reasonably
confident about the first and third results; that female and male partners assault each other
about equally often and that violence runs in couples. Nor do we have reason to doubt
that the offspring of violent parents are unlikely to be violent themselves, albeit at greater
risk of being violent than are the children of non-violent parents. We have much less
confidence in the second result, finding it hard to credit that women injure men as
seriously as men injure women. We hope that our measures of the severity of injury and
pain were a reasonable first attempt. Nevertheless, in future work it will be important to
compare subjective assessments of severity to more reliable and objective measures.

12 REFERENCES

Age, The (1993) ‘War on women’, June 4.
Australian Bureau of Statistics. 1997. Australian Women’s Year Book, Canberra: ABS
Australian Bureau of Statistics. 1996. Women’s Safety Australia, Canberra: ABS
Chappell, C. & Heiner, R. (1990) "The intergenerational transmission of family
aggression" Journal of Family Violence 5(2):135-52.
Gelles, R. 1987. Family Violence. Beverly Hills: Sage.
Gelles, R. & Straus, M. 1988. Intimate Violence: The Causes and Consequences of Abuse
in the American Family. New York: Simon & Schuster .
Headey, B. K. Funder, D. Scott, J. Kelley, and M.D.R. Evans. 1996. "Family Interaction
Module" in J. Kelley and M.D.R. Evans (eds.) IsssA: International Social Science Survey/
Australia 1996/97: Questionnaire. Canberra and Melbourne: Australian National
University and University of Melbourne.
James, M. & Carcach, C. 1997. Homicide in Australia 1989-96, Australian Institute of
Criminology Research and Public Policy Series No.13.
Jurik, N. & Gregware, P. 1989. A Method for Murder: An Interactionist Analysis of
Homicides by Women. Tempe: Arizona State University, School of Justice Studies.

Hosted by www.Geocities.ws

1