Univariate Analysis of Variance

Table 7

 

Table 7 continues to evaluate age group, perceptions of health status, and beneficiary groups. 

This series of data looks at the satisfaction survey using univariate analysis.

 Below is a listing of the operational definitions along with the number of responses for each group.

 

Between-Subjects Factors

 

 

Value Label

N

MAGEGRP

1

0-4

1399

2

5-14

1538

3

15-17

403

4

18-24

1467

5

25-34

3007

6

35-44

3094

7

45-64

5682

8

65+

4407

Q17 OVERALL HEALTH STATUS

1

POOR

1209

2

FAIR

3459

3

GOOD

6832

4

VERYGOOD

6257

5

EXCELLENT

3240

MBENEGRP

1

ACT

4084

2

DA

6175

3

RET

4897

4

DR-DS

5447

5

GRD

192

6

OTH

202

 

 

 

 

 

 

Table 8

 

 

 

Tests of Between-Subjects Effects
Dependent Variable: Q3J OVERALL QUALITY OF CARE & SERVICE RECEIVED

Source

Type III Sum of Squares

df

Mean Square

F

Sig.

Corrected Model

1522.728(a)

176

8.652

10.267

.000

Intercept

9249.009

1

9249.009

10975.353

.000

MAGEGRP

43.665

7

6.238

7.402

.000

Q17

24.709

4

6.177

7.330

.000

MBENEGRP

16.405

5

3.281

3.893

.002

MAGEGRP * Q17

37.405

28

1.336

1.585

.026

MAGEGRP * MBENEGRP

31.853

26

1.225

1.454

.063

Q17 * MBENEGRP

14.208

20

.710

.843

.662

MAGEGRP * Q17 * MBENEGRP

85.207

86

.991

1.176

.128

Error

17545.164

20820

.843

 

 

Total

402116.000

20997

 

 

 

Corrected Total

19067.892

20996

 

 

 

a R Squared = .080 (Adjusted R Squared = .072)

 

Table 8 is similar to Table 4 (which showed significant F ratios (p < .001) for age group and perception of health status as related to overall satisfaction with care received.  Gender was not significant to determine level of satisfaction with care received).  However,  gender was replaced with beneficiary group.  Notice that MBENEGRP shows F = 3.893 and p = .002, which are highly significant results in terms of satisfaction with care received.

 

 

Hosted by www.Geocities.ws

1