Univariate Analysis of Variance

 

Table 3

Table 3 lists exactly how the three variables are operationally defined.

It shows the distribution of responses for each category within the variables.

Note that the variable “gender” is added to the analysis.

 

Between-Subjects Factors

 

 

Value Label

N

MAGEGRP

1

0-4

1399

2

5-14

1538

3

15-17

403

4

18-24

1467

5

25-34

3007

6

35-44

3094

7

45-64

5682

8

65+

4407

Q17 OVERALL HEALTH STATUS

1

POOR

1209

2

FAIR

3459

3

GOOD

6832

4

VERYGOOD

6257

5

EXCELLENT

3240

MGENDER

1

F

10747

2

M

10250

 

 

 

 

 

 

Table 4

 

Tests of Between-Subjects Effects
Dependent Variable: Q3J OVERALL QUALITY OF CARE & SERVICE RECEIVED

Source

Type III Sum of Squares

df

Mean Square

F

Sig.

Corrected Model

1359.297(a)

79

17.206

20.324

.000

Intercept

102310.524

1

102310.524

120846.923

.000

MAGEGRP

602.207

7

86.030

101.616

.000

Q17

163.252

4

40.813

48.208

.000

MGENDER

1.665

1

1.665

1.967

.161

MAGEGRP * Q17

69.301

28

2.475

2.923

.000

MAGEGRP * MGENDER

8.101

7

1.157

1.367

.214

Q17 * MGENDER

2.327

4

.582

.687

.601

MAGEGRP * Q17 * MGENDER

27.281

28

.974

1.151

.266

Error

17708.595

20917

.847

 

 

Total

402116.000

20997

 

 

 

Corrected Total

19067.892

20996

 

 

 

a R Squared = .071 (Adjusted R Squared = .068)

 

Table 4 lists very significant F ratios (p < .001) for age group and perception of health status (Q17) as related to overall satisfaction with care received.  Observe that gender (in this study) does not significantly determine level of satisfaction with care received (F = 1.96, and p = .161).

 

Hosted by www.Geocities.ws

1