The JvL Bi-Weekly

 

James van Luik:

Publisher & Editor

 

Saturday 113002

 

Volume 1, No. 5

 

2 Articles:

 

  1. According to the United Nations

Vaccines Benefit Mainly the Rich

  1. Military Recruiters: A U.S. Federal education bill requires high

schools to share student data with the Pentagon

 

“There is a saying in the villages of  the  Narmada valley – ‘You can wake someone who is sleeping. But you can’t wake someone who is pretending to sleep.’”  Arundhati Roy

 

 

1.                 According to the World Health Organization Vaccines Benefit Mainly the Rich

By

Irwin Arieff

 

UNITED NATIONS – Vaccinations have prevented millions of deaths around the world but children in wealthy nations are getting the lion’s share of the shots – and the benefits, the United Nations said on Wednesday,  November 11th.

 

While young people in rich countries have access to the latest and costliest vaccines available, just 50 percent of children in sub-Saharan Africa are immunized during their first year of life against common diseases like tuberculosis, measles, tetanus, and whooping cough, three U.N. agencies said in a joint report.

 

In poor and isolated parts of some developing nations, vaccines reach fewer than one in 20 children, said the report by the World Health Organization, the World Bank and the U.N. Children’s Fund UNICEF.

 

“Immunization, as powerful and successful as it is, has yet to reach its enormous potential,” the report said. “The right to protection from preventable diseases is the right of every child and it is well within our collective capacity to realize that right.”

 

A quarter of the world’s children lack protection from common preventable diseases, according to the report. Nearly 3 million people -- 2 million of them children – die every year from those diseases, it said.

 

While vaccines for diseases like meningitis and pneumonia are widely available in rich nations, children in developing countries are dying from these same ailments, it found.

 

According to the report rich nations annually provide $1.56 billion in aid to immunization programs.

 

An extra $250 million a year would cover the cost of basic vaccines for at least another 10 million children, it said.

 

A further $100 million would cover the cost of newer vaccines for these children, including  those protecting against hepatitis B and haemophilus influenzae type B (Hib).

 

Hepatitis B now causes 520,000 deaths a year worldwide while HIB kills 450,000 children in developing countries, the report said.

 

Developing nations which currently spend as little as $6 a year per person on health including immunizations, also need to increase their spending, it said.

 

The low levels of protection against diseases that ravage primarily the developing  world are also having a significant impact on vaccine research, the study found.

 

Drug companies find they have little incentive to invest in vaccines for diseases that attack mostly the poor, such as Shigella dysentery, dengue, Japanese encephalitis, leishmaniasis, schistosmiasis and cholera, the report said.

 

It called on pharmaceutical firms – with help from wealthy governments – to redouble their efforts to develop vaccines against malaria, which kills about a million people a years, most of them African children and tuberculosis, which killed 1.7 million people in 2000, mostly in the poor nations.

 

 

2. Military Recruiters: A U.S. federal education bill requires high

schools to share student data with the Pentagon

By

Susan Milligan

 

Washington – A little noticed provision in a new federal education law requires high schools to provide names, addresses, and phone numbers of students to military recruiters. Schools that refuse to comply face losing federal education funding under the Elementary and Secondary Education Act.

 

Under the rule, part of the No Child Left Behind Act signed earlier this year, Pentagon recruiters are entitled to students’ contact information unless parents opt out of sharing the data, a requirement that has alarmed civil libertarians and school administrators.

 

“We don’t wish to appear antimilitary. The military is a great first step out of high school for a lot of kids, land it is a fine career for some people,” said Bruce Hunter, a lobbyist for the American Association of School Administrators.

 

Nevertheless, the association opposed the provision because it took discretion away from local school boards. “We weren’t happy because we’re a big local control outfit.”

 

The law also requires high schools to allow military recruiters the same campus access as administrators give to colleges and job recruiters. Some school, including those in San Francisco and Portland, Ore., had refused military recruiters access to their campuses on the grounds that the Pentagon discriminated against gays and lesbians.

 

Education Secretary Rod Paige sent a letter last month to school administrators explaining the new regulations. Department spokesman Jim Bradshaw said the rationale for the rule was that the military “felt this  was needed to boost recruitment.”

 

Major Sandy Troeber, a Defense Department spokeswoman, said the rules were “brought about by congressional support for military recruiting efforts.” The Selective Service already requires men in the United States to register for the draft within 30 days of their 18th birthday.

 

But a fact sheet provided by the Pentagon said that the cost of recruiting had doubled in the past decade and that “access to students can significantly reduce the cost of recruiting.”

 

The Pentagon had been trying for years to insert the recruitment provisions into education legislation to counter what they saw as a lack of cooperation form some high schools according to lobbyists and congressional aides. But this year the education bill was so loaded with other contentious issues, such as school vouchers, funding matters, and testing standards, that lawmakers who might have fought the new recruitment rules had their energies focused on other provisions.

 

“It wasn’t on anybody’s radar. It was buried so deep in the legislation,” said Kathleen Lyons, spokeswoman for the National Education Association. The group has only recently begun studying the issue and hasn’t yet taken a position on it, she said.

 

Senator Edward M. Kennedy, a Democrat of Massachusetts and major negotiator on the Leave No Child Behind Act, had fought successfully for several years to keep the military recruitment rules out of education bills, but couldn’t win the battle this year, especially since bigger education issues were dominating the debate. Senator Tim Hutchinson, Republican of Arkansas, engineered the inclusion of the new language, said a Kennedy staff person.

 

“All this provision does is provide military recruiters with the same access to directory information that colleges currently enjoy,” Kennedy  said in a statement.

 

Civil libertarians are concerned about the rule nonetheless.

 

“We opposed it primarily on privacy grounds, that students or parents should be able to control access to directory information, such as names, addresses, ages,” said Christopher Anders, legislative counsel for the American Civil Liberties Union. “That information shouldn’t be sent out to military recruiters unless parents want it sent out.”

 

Under federal privacy laws, schools generally must have written permission from parents or students to release any information about a student’s education record, according to the Education Department. Exceptions including handing records  over to a transfer school, to law enforcement in some cases, and to officials who need the information in cases of health or safety emergencies.

 

Schools have been able to release what is called “directory information,” such as names addresses, phone numbers, and date and place of birth, but they had also to give parents the option of refusing disclosure of their child’s information. School boards have been able to make their own decisions as to whether or not to be involved in providing directory information to outside individuals or organizations.

 

The difference under the new rule is that schools will not have the discretion to refuse to provide such information to the military; they must provide the information to recruiters and allow them on campus at the Pentagon’s request.

 

Groups such as the American Friends Service Committee and the Central Committee for Conscientious Objectors, an antimilitary draft organization, have been fielding complaints about the new rules, but are not sure whether they can successfully challenge them, especially in the environment created by the Sept. 11, 2001, terror attacks. Analysts are looking at whether the rules violate existing privacy law said Oscar Castro, an AFSC official.

 

Jill Wynns, president of the San Francisco Board of Education, said the board’s attorneys are looking at the law to see whether the Bay Area school system can keep any part of its current written policy, which prohibits military recruiters from coming on campus and bars the release of any student information to military recruiters “or any one who asks for it.”

 

 

-------------------------------------------------------------------

 

Arundhati Roy has authored these two excellent books: “The God of Small Things” (a beautifully written novel). And “Power Politics” (a series of  excellent political essays).

Hosted by www.Geocities.ws

1