This document contains basic information about the review page. It gives some of my thoughts on why this page is better than other review pages and defines the terms used in the reviews and tables.
This document contains detailed reviews of the HTML editors I've used. This site is different from many others primarily in the depth of coverage. On other pages you will find a brief description of an editor and a rating. Hardly enough for anyone to make an informed judgement. "Carl Davis's HTML Editor Review Page" includes much more:
- Detailed reviews which point out major features in each editor and how they operate. Also, if there are any major problems, you'll find them as well. However, this information is organized so you can scan it quickly and read the details if you want.
- Comprehensive comparison matrix compares all the editors side-by-side. This table helps you see how all the packages compare at a glance (OK, you'll need to scroll sometimes!). I haven't seen any other reviews on the web which gives you this depth of information.
- An Editor Selection Helper Applet (Java based) provide you a way to compare the editors using your criteria. A intuitive interface steps you through the steps to define what is important to you. When your done, the helper will rank the editors for you.
I've attempted to be as impartial as possible with each package. I attempt to use each package for at least 8 hours performing some typical tasks. These included--multiple formatting techniques, using compound and simple tags, creating different lists, inserting in-line graphics, using table/form/frame/etc. editors, and composing links. However, it is possible that I've missed features that were present, or made some other error. With this in mind, I invite readers to offer corrections
Also, if you have used any of these programs, and have a different perspective on them please send me your comments. Thanks to all the individuals who have pointed me to many of these packages.
Currently this document covers mostly MS-Windows applications. I am actively looking into stand alone programs and templates for MS-Word. However, I've set the document up so that other platforms can be discussed and I am open to including reviews of other packages on this page (or links to other reviews). Anyone who offers a review will, of course, receive full credit.
The reviews do not cover every detail of each package. It's rare to see a package that does not support most of the basic HTML constructs. For this reason, the reviews focus on how each package excels and falls short.
This section defines the phrases used in the overview section for each editor. All possible values are enumerated.
![]()