Quo
vadis, Meänkieli?
Twenty years after "The Last Language Struggle"
Erling
Wande
Stockholm
About
twenty years ago a group of young Tornedalians organized a conference in Svanstein
in the Swedish Torne Valley (Tornedalen) called "The Last Language Struggle".
Because of the Swedishization policy in Tornedalen, pursued by Swedish authorities
especially in educational policy sporadically from the end of the 19th century,
and other societal factors, language shift from bilingualism in Tornedal Finnish
and Swedish to Swedish monolingualism was becoming more and more frequent among
younger Tornedalians. Could anything be done in order to put an end to this
development? Or was it too late already? Was there any future for a Tornedal
Finnish language and cultural heritage? These were questions asked by the organizers
of the conference.
The discussion, started in connection to the conference, resulted in the founding
of an association, a Central Union for Swedish Tornedalians (Svenska Tornedalingars
Riksförbund-Tornionlaaksolaiset, STR-T). An ideological consequence of
the conference was the development of a more conscious ethnic identity among
many of those who were active in the association. This was, in turn, concretely
manifested in the change of the name of the language variety, from Tornedal
Finnish to Meänkieli. This change suggested that the variety was regarded
as a language in its own right, not merely a dialect. Twenty years after "The
Last Language Struggle" Meänkieli has been recognized as a minority
language in Sweden, according to a parliamentary resolution (Dec. 9, 1999),
which gained legal force on April 1, 2000.
Is this a Tornedalian success story or not? With a brief overview of the main
features of the development of educational policy since the beginning of the
80s, the paper will try to analyze what factors have contributed to the development
of Meänkieli and Meänkieli-related culture during the period.
1. The concept Meänkieli is used here to represent not only the language in its concrete linguistic manifestations, but an attitude and a symbol for a movement.