Theory
of Knowledge December Practice Quiz
Short answer questions:
1) Write out an
example of deductive and one of inductive logic. Make sure to label which is which. What is required for a sound argument?
2) Create your own
valid syllogism. Name what category of
syllogism it is.
3) Briefly discuss how
brain imaging techniques have changed our understanding of the brain. (Include a description of how an imaging
techniques works and an example of what we know now that we didn’t know without
imaging.)
4) Give an example of
“persistence of convention.”
5)
What did Protagoras mean by his statement that
"man is the measure of all things?"
6)
Briefly describe the difference between "knowing
how" and "knowing that." Give an example of something you know
from each. Be sure to make clear which example is which.
7)
Describe the requirements of propositional
knowledge. Give an example of
something that satisfies all of the requirements.
8)
A couple of the problems we found with “naming and
meaning” were ambiguity and redundancy.
Outline an example of each.
9)
Describe what phantom limb syndrome is and explain why
it occurs.
10) What is
proprioception?
11) Find as many
logical fallacies as you can in the following passage:
Energy Policy
There is no good reason to suppose that solar energy will be
capable of meeting all of our energy needs. And since solar energy is incapable
of meeting our energy needs, it is clear that we must not decrease government
support for nuclear energy.
For all their thinly
disguised rhetoric, founded upon the cheapest misrepresentations of scientific
fact, the environmentalists have not yet succeeded in laying to rest the
uncomfortable visions that accompany the thought of a future without nuclear
energy. One can imagine a human race thrown into chaos by the spectre of
starvation and cold. Already there have been instances of elderly persons on
fixed incomes literally freezing to death because they could not afford heating
fuel. As the top executives of every major oil corporation have pointed out, we
can all expect to endure some energy shortages in the near future. The energy
problems that face this nation, and the entire world, are nothing less than a
crisis.
Despite the seriousness of
the situation, many environmentalists propose that we should now abandon
nuclear energy and rely entirely on passive solar energy. How are we to meet
the energy needs of the world on an energy source as unreliable and costly as
solar energy? You can take it from me that all of the various tricks that
masquerade under the head of solar "technology" are pitifully
inefficient. Using the greenhouse effect to heat water, for example, rarely
succeeds in increasing the water temperature to slightly below tepid. From this
we may infer that all of the other methods of solar heating are equally
inefficient, and since this is true it should be obvious that solar technology
as a whole cannot possibly collect enough energy to meet the needs of an
ever-increasing world population.
We must, therefore, not
abandon our efforts to improve nuclear technology. Although not all the bugs
have been worked out of our present nuclear reactors, the environmentalists
have no room for complaint. Solar energy is also far from perfect. More importantly,
we must not reduce governmental support for nuclear power. The recent energy
shortage followed directly on the heels of precisely such a reduction in
governmental support. Had the government not relaxed its efforts on behalf of
nuclear energy, the country would never have had to endure that devastating
crunch.
Medium length answer
questions. (Do 1 and either 2 or 3.) :
1) Compare two of the
“Good Reasons for Knowing.” Consider
how each of the ways you choose functions, both when it is “working” and when
it fails. Use examples from class
discussions, labs, readings, assignments and your own research for projects to
back up your points. (About three or
four paragraphs. One page.)
2) Outline how one of
the senses works. Consider the function
of the sensory organ as well as the interpretation of this data by the
brain. Include details of what you can
distinguish with the sense when it is functioning correctly and the type and
nature of malfunctions of the sense.
(Two paragraphs. About half to
two thirds of a page.)
3) Describe your (or
someone else’s) brain project topic.
(Two paragraphs. About half to
two thirds of a page.)
Choose one of the following
essay questions (about 5 or 6 paragraphs.
A page and a half.):
1) Discuss the role
that communication plays in knowledge.
Consider: how communications
relates to the good reasons of knowing, how words and meaning (the basis of
communication) work and when and how they do not work well.
2) Discuss the brain
and how it relates to knowledge. Consider:
how the brain relates to the good reasons for knowing, and ways in which it
does not do its job correctly. Use examples
from the brain project presentations (see the study guides online) and the
class discussions we had on the scientific view of the brain.