Nuclear Chemistry Research Projects


Objective:  To research a topic in nuclear chemistry and do a project to display what you have learned.

Groups: You should work on your own.  You may work in pairs IF you present a proposal to me that explains exactly what your project is and what each of you will be responsible for, AND I ok it.

Format of presentation:
Open.  You should choose a format well-suited to your topic.  For example, a topic in technology can often be well-represented by a display or experiment, while a theoretical topic is better suited to an essay or perhaps poster paper presentation.  Other formats to consider are: demonstration, computer-based presentation (Powerpoint or web page, for example), video, model, debate and oral presentation.

What you will be doing: You will be expected to complete the following steps:

  1. Choose a topic of interest to you, a brief outline of exactly what you will be learning about in carrying out the project, a format for your presentation and a couple of good initial sources (correctly cited) that you will be using to get to know your topic. (Due May 9.)
  2. Research your topic, gathering at least 3 up-to-date sources that are well-suited to your level of understanding and your topic. (Due May 12.)
  3. Present a detailed outline or concept map of your topic and how you intend to deal with it given your format. (Due May 16.)
  4. Present you final project with a bibliography.  (Due May 18.)

Topic suggestions and possible initial sources:
 

Topic

Source or ideas

Health effects of ionizing radiation

Types of ionizing radiation and effects

Sources of ionizing rad. (natural and man-made)

Units used to measure and the result of different exposure levels

Cosmic rays

Source

Effect on evolution

How to measure

Nuclear processes in stars

Fusion cycles

Rad. From Sun and effect on Earth (or astronauts, communication, etc.)

We are star dust

Life cycle of stars

Supernova explosions

Abundance of elements

Dismantling nuclear reactors

Scientific American, March 2003

Nuclear reactors

Types

Chernobyl and Three Mile Island

Economics

Nuclear weapons

A, H and N Bombs and Tactical Weapons

Teller, Oppenheimer and the Politics of Cold War

Decomissioning

Dirty nuclear weapons and terrorism

Dirty War video available at Euphoria

Origin of matter in the Universe

Scientific American, June 2003

Geology and radiation

Heating of Earth

Natural Reactor

Dating techniques

Nuclear chemistry in archaeology     

Scientific American,  June 2003

Dating techniques

Cancer treatments and radiation

Which radioisotopes are used to treat which forms of cancer?

Medical diagnostics and radiation

PET scans

Modern alchemy

How can we make gold from lead?

Elements in the “Island of Stability

 

Modes of decay other than alpha, beta and gamma

 

Radiation and smoke detectors

 



How you will be marked:  Your project will be marked out of 20 on difficulty of material, research, understanding and presentation. A further 4 marks will be assigned according to how you work on your project during class time and how punctual you are in each of the steps.

 

4

3

2

1

Difficulty

I chose a topic that challenged me but that I was able to master.

I chose a topic that was a bit below or above my level.

I chose a topic that I already had a pretty good understanding of.

I chose a topic that I had already learned about in this or a previous class.

Research

I researched my topic thoroughly and found lots of information in various formats (WWW, books, articles) suited to my level.

I researched my topic well and found more than three sources mostly on the web. Most of my sources were at the right level  for me.

I researched my topic a bit and found three or four web sources.  A few of my sources were at the right level.

I did a little research on my topic and found three web sources which were either too easy or difficult for me.

Understanding

I understood my topic well and was able to show what I learned.

I mostly understood my topic and was able to show what I learned.

I understood some of my topic and showed some of what I knew.

I understood little of my topic.

Presentation

My format was suited to my topic. My presentation was clear and interesting.

My format was pretty well suited to my topic. My presentation was usually clear and interesting.

My format was somewhat suited to my topic. My presentation was occasionally clear and interesting.

My format was not suited to my topic. My presentation was confusing.

 

Hosted by www.Geocities.ws

1