|
This is a film so eccentric and so
elaborate that it takes many viewings to fully understand it's
subtle nuances, and even then there are multiple interpretations,
meanings, symbolisms, etc. that it's hard to determine just what
this film is. I viewed it twice, and I'm still not sure how I
feel about it. That's a good thing, I think. What it is is
a great freshman film that contains some powerful imagery and subtle
details that some fully established directors still don't grasp.
Made on a minimal budget, much of the strength of the film lies in
it's minimalism. It's a science fiction fantasy film which
lacks the overblown special effects. It's got elements of
horror without the overdone gore, and overblown scares.
Instead, the emotion is carried through the actors, namely Jake
Gyllenhaal, who owns the role so thoroughly it was as if he was born
for this role. He encompasses what is Donnie and portrays both
the weak high school kid who's a bit shy and uncertain while
believably able to convert with Donnie possessed with "Frank" into a
powerful cocksure man, and back again from scene to scene, and even
within scenes. While not a very visually strong film in any
way, the look of the film fit the piece well. What jumped out
at me most in both viewings was the use of the score and music.
Both the score and the songs were perfect matches where and when
used to complement and even takeover the film. By the time "Mad
World" rolls into the climax I was swept away by the words and
pacing of the song with the visuals and pacing of the film.
There is so much going on that much like Mulholland Dr. it
causes you to stop, think, consider, rethink, rewatch. But
unlike Mulholland, Donnie fails to engage you
completely into caring 100% about these characters, and that hurts.
While Mulholland had you wrapped up in the characters'
journey, Donnie leaves you on the outside trying to figure
out what and why exactly things are happening and why Donnie is
doing what he is. What does the rabbit mean? What is
this business with time travel? Where is the time machine?
etc. With so many questions early and not much
characterization, instead of becoming a part of Donnie's journey,
you're on the outside watching it and trying to answer your own
questions. I just felt that there was no engagement in Donnie
because he was too quirky and too "evil" too early on. In
fact, I found myself more connected to Gretchen who is much less
significant in the whole of the film, because her confusion but
intrigue with Donnie mirrored my own. Maybe that's what Kelly
was going for all along, I'm not sure. Maybe with further
viewings, more will become clear, or perhaps it will be muddier.
Either way, I will view this more to grasp how I truly feel about
it, which means it's a good engaging film, and not a confusing film
you watch once and throw out as a jumbled mess. A very fine
line, indeed. I look forward to more Kelly films. 8/10
for now.
|
|