How to determine what is Orthodox
Christianity Today?
Text: I Thes.
Introduction: How can we today distinguish between genuine New Testament Christianity and
apostate forms of Christianity or between orthodox and unorthodox?
I. New Testament Doctrine and Practice
is the Standard for Othodoxy
A. What is the
difference between Deviant and Genuine Christianity?
1. Dr. Walter Martin - A cult, then, is a group of people polarized around someone’s
interpretation of the Bible and is characterized by major deviations
from orthodox
Christianity relative to the cardinal doctrines of the
Christian faith…[1] (emphasis mine)
2. Dr. Josh McDowell – A cult is a perversion, a distortion of Biblical Christianity and/or a
rejection of historic teachings of the Christian Church.[2]
3. James Sire - Any religious movement that is organizationally distinct and has
doctrines
and/or practices that
contradict those of the Scriptures as
interpreted by
traditional
Christianity as represented by the major Catholic and Protestant
denominations,
and as expressed in such statements as the Apostles Creed.[3]
Conclusion: All agree that deviant or cultic Christianity is a departure from Biblical Christianity
or what is referred to as “orthodox” Christianity.
B. The problem of defining “orthodox”
is well stated by John A. Silba
The first problem with the definition of a cult as an unorthodox
religious group is that it
leaves unsolved the
question of Christian orthodoxy. Sire’s definition seems to include all
traditional
Christianity (Catholic and Protestant) under the standard of orthodoxy, thereby
bypassing the
many debates that have split the Christian Church through he ages. The
narrower standard
proposed by Martin is that of evangelical Christianity, a criterion that
excludes several
well established Christian churches and sects which are judged to be
unorthodox and hence liable to be called
cults…Many…have at times referred to the
Catholic Church as a cult…[4]
CONCLUSION: Every conflicting denomination claims to be New Testament orthodoxy. Everyone has their personal opinion as to the definition of New Testament orthodoxy? Every denomination uses its own creed or articles of faith as the standard of New Testament orthodoxy. How can you or I tell what is New Testament orthodoxy? Is there a way to determine the essentials of New Testament Christianity? If not, then it is one denominations opinion versus another denominations opinion. This is the problem. Is there a clear and decisive solution to this problem?
II. Discovering the Biblical Standard
for Orthodoxy
Intro: The standard for orthodoxy can be easily discovered by the use of common sense principles
and common sense rules of interpretation.
A. Four Principles
for Discovering Biblical Orthodoxy: There are four clear reasonable and
Biblical principles that can be used to
define Biblical Orthodoxy. The principles are so clear
that no one can deny without being
irrational and unreasonable. These principles need no
interpretation as they are unambiguous and
clear.
Principle #1: Every doctrine and/or
practice that the Bible itself clearly states or necessarily
infers to be non-negotionable or absolutely essential must be regarded as
orthodox
example: One gospel – Gal. 1:6-9 – “if any man preach any other gospel….”
example: One God – Deut. 4:6; 13:1-5
example: One way to heaven – John 14:6 – “no man cometh to the Father but by me”
example: Necessity of new birth – John 3:3,5 – “ye must be born again”
example: grace cannot be mixed with works – Rom. 11:6
Principle #2: Every doctrine and practice
that is essential to distinguish Christianity from
other world religions must be regarded as
orthodox
The Bible as the authorized revealed will of God – Isa. 8:20; 2 Tim. 3:16-17 Rev. 22:18-19
The Triune God of the Bible – Deut. 13:1-5; 2 Jn. 9-11; Jn. 17:3; Mt. 28:19; 2 Cor. 13:13
The One Way of Salvation of the Bible – Jn. 14:6; Acts 4:12; Gal. 1:8-9; Acts 10:43
The One and Only God/man Savior – Jn. 1:1; 2 Jn. 9-11
The Resurrection of the Christ – I Cor. 15:1-20
The New Testament Church and its ordinances – Mt. 16:18; 28:19-20; I Cor. 11
Principle #3 - All doctrine and practice
that are essential to preserve essential N.T.
Christianity
The Scriptures as the basis for faith and practice – Psa. 12:6-7; Isa. 8:20; 2 Tim. 3:16-17
The Continuing Church Institution as the pillar and ground of truth – I Tim. 3:15; Mt. 16:18
The Age long Great Commission process of making disciples – Mt. 28:19-20
Principle #4 - All Doctrine and Practice
that distinguish N.T. Christianity from predicted
Apostate Christianity
The Bible clearly predicts such an apostasy? – I Tim. 4:1; 2 Thes. 2:3; Mt. 24:24-25; Jude 3
The Bible clearly lists some of the false doctrines? – I Tim. 4:1-5; 2 Jn. 9-11; Gal. 1:8-9
Apostate Christianity will deny or distort one or more of the above three principles
- It will deny non-negotionable doctrines that the Bible demands to be essential
- It will deny essentials that distinguish Christianity from other world religions
- It will deny essentials that preserve N.T. Christianity
CONCLUSION: These four reasonable and Biblical principles if applied will define every doctrine
and practice essential to Orthodox Christianity. Cultic or unorthodox Christianity are those
institutions or denominations that violate the above four principles.
B. Three Clear Biblical rules of Interpretation: However, it is one thing to identify the correct doctrines and practice and another thing to interpret them correctly. There are some denominations that profess to believe and practice these essentials but in reality they deny them by their distorted interpretation and practice. How does one determine the right interpretation of a specific doctrine and practice in order to identify orthodox Christianity from unorthodox Christianity? Just as there are four common sense principles that can be used to discover the essentials of orthodoxy there are three common sense rules of interpretation that none can deny without being unreasonable and irrational. All false doctrine is a result of failing to apply these principles. If these principles are applied truth will always be the result.
1. The Golden Rule of Interpretation: “When the plain sense of Scriptures makes common sense, seek no other sense; therefore, take every word at its primary, ordinary, usual, literal meaning unless the facts of the immediate context, studied in the light of related passages and axiomatic (self-evident) and fundamental truths, indicate clearly otherwise.” Any doctrine that violates this golden rule should be rejected as error. All the below rules of interpretation are included in this golden rule.
2. The Rule of Interpreting the Unclear by the Clear: Common sense tells us that unclear, ambiguous and difficult passages should be interpreted by clear and unambiguous passages – NEVER THE REVERSE. Never should one accept interpretations that are based primarily upon parabolic, symbolic, allegorical or spiritualizations when such interpretations are in obvious contradiction to the plain sense of clear precepts and examples of Scripture. Always should doctrine be based upon clear precepts and teaching of Scriptures and then supported by parabolic, allegorical and symbolic portions of Scripture. All doctrine and practice that contradicts this common sense rule should be rejected as error.
Example: The clear precepts of the New Birth should not be interpreted by a spiritualized
Interpretation of Revelation 7:1-9 – JW’s
Example: The clear teachings on the N.T. Church (Mt. 16:18) should not be interpreted by a
spiritualized Interpretation of Rev. 12-14 – Seventh Day Adventists
3. The Rule of Context: Every word, every text of Scripture should be interpreted according to its intended historical, grammatical and immediate context and then that interpretation should be compared to the overall Biblcal context dealing with that particular subject. Any interpretation or application of a text that violates or contradicts its original historical contextual intent is to be rejected as error. Any interpretation that violates the immediate and overall context should be rejected as error.
Example: The Open Window Method – (Jerking texts out of contexts)
- Judas went out and hanged himself
- Go thou and do likewise
- Whatsoever thou doest, do quickly
Example: The Subjective Methods
– “I feel…I think” – 2 Pet. 1:20-21; I Cor. 14:38
- “What truth God has for me in this text may not be a truth for you”
The Escape Assertion: “That is your interpretation” – Response: “Show me why my interpretation
is wrong – Let me show you why yours is wrong.” Put up or shut up.
III.
Does God’s Word Promise the
Uninterrupted Continuation
of Essential N.T. Christianity until Jesus
Comes Again?
A. The Clear Precepts of Scripture
1.
The clear promise of age long Existence – Mt. 28:19-20
a. The English text states it clearly– “I am with you always even unto the end of the world”
b. The Greek text clearly demands it – “I am with you all the days even unto the end of the age”
c. One of Protestants top Greek scholars translates the meaning
“I am with you day in and day out until the end of this age” – William Hendricksen
d. The necessary inference of a repeating ongoing cycle - go..baptize.teach….go…etc.
(1) The grammar demands it – one main verb modified by three participles
(2) The concluding participle necessarily infers it ‘Teaching them to observe all things”
e. The guiding precept restricts this to a reproductive cycle of like faith and order – “teaching
them all things whatsoever I HAVE COMMANDED.”
(1) the nature of the precept demands the principle of SAMENESS not DIFFERENCE
(a) going with the SAME gospel – Jn. 3:16,36
(b) administering the SAME baptism – Lk. 7:29-30; Jn. 4:1-2
(c) teaching the SAME faith and practice – Acts 2:42; Jude 3
(2) the nature of the commission requires the New Testament Church as the subject
(a) the plural “you”
(2) the necessity of assembling in order to obey commission
- all aspects require physical gathering together
- Mt. 18:15-17 cannot be taught apart from mutual church membership
f. The combination of promise, precept and necessary inferences require this text teaches clearly
the age long reproduction of churches of like faith and order.
2. Gates of hades shall never prevail against it – Mt. 16:18
a. Same book same author same promise would infer it refers to the same kind of church as in
Matthew 28:19-20
b. Same author, same promise of the same keys infer the same church as in Mt. 18:15-18
3.
Continuity of Church through this age and into the eternal age – Eph. 3:21
B. The Clear Practice of Scripture confirms the Great
Commission Promise – Acts
2:41-42
1. The Great Commission in practice - Same gospel -Same baptism - Same doctrine and practice
2. The Grammatical Customary Practice – Paraphrastic construction (imperfect verb with
present
to be verb) – “continued steadfastly” – Acts
a. Imperfect verb indicates continuous action in past time without beginning and ending points
b. Present tense linking verb indicates this is an ongoing action right up to point of writing
c. Beginning and ending points of paraphastic construction are defined by the point of giving the
great commission and the termination point found in the great commission.
d. Paraphrastic
construction just another way of expressing the Great Commission promise “day
in and day out unto the end of the age.”
3. The Customary practice confirmed by “added” and “multiplied “ statements – Acts 5:14;
6:1,7; 14:22;
16:5 – added in the same customary
manner or else a contradiction exists
4.
The Customary practice confirmed through ordained representatives – Acts 8:14;
a. Philip given as an example of ordained man doing missionary work – Acts 6:4; 8:5
b. Others were ordained men doing missionary work – Acts 11:19
(1) Masculine pronouns used only (“hoi” – Acts 8:4;11:19)
(2) Term for males only used “andres” – Acts 11:20
c. The practice of the church in regard to mission points – Acts 11:22-25
d. The practice
of the church at Antioch – Acts 13:1-4; 14:22-23; 14:26;15:2-3;
e. Any other interpretation contradicts the Great Commission and the customary practice of Acts
C. The Clear Inferences of Scripture confirm the Great
Commission Promise of
Continuity
1. Continuity of Church through this age inferred by Lord’s Supper Command – I Cor. 11:26
2. Continuity of Church through this age inferred by addressee of End of the Age book – Rev.
3. Continuity of Church through this age inferred by presentation at end – Eph. 5:26,27; Rev.
19:6-7
D. The Clear application of the above precepts,
principles, promises and
inferences demand that –
1. Orthodox Christianity is restricted to those churches that identify with the SAMENESS
principle found in the Great Commission in regard to the gospel and baptism.
a. SAME gospel excludes all but evangelical Christianity – Jn. 5:24; Eph. 2:8-9; Rm.11:6;
Gal.1:8
b. SAME baptism excludes all but Evangelical Baptistic Christianity – Lk. 7:29-30; Rom. 6:4-5
2. Orthodox Christian Churches are those who originate through this historical reproductive cycle
of sameness
a. Excludes and condemns as unorthodox all churches that self-originate apart from this age long
cycle of reproductive sameness
b. Includes as orthodox only those churches that originate from churches of like faith and order
found within this historical reproductive cycle.
Conclusion: New
Testament churches DO NOT EVOLVE. They are MADE
through the Great
Commission reproductive cycle from a previous
existing church of like
faith and order – like begets like. They
are
made either directly by
a previous church of like faith and order or
indirectly through such a
church’s ordained representative. (early
American Baptists called
this “regular church order”). Only such
New Testament Churches represent
ORTHODOX CHRISTIANITY
today.
[1] Walter Martin, The Rise of Cults, (Santa Ana, CA., Vision House Pub. 1997), p. 12
[2] Josh McDowell, Handbook of Today’s Religions. (Nashville, TN: Thomas Nelson, 1992) p. 17
[3] James Sire, Scripture Twisting; 20 Ways Cults Misread the Bible. (Downers Grove, IL: Intervarsity Press, 1980), p. 20
[4] John A. Silba, Understanding New Religious Movements. (Grand Rapids, MI, Eerdmands) 1995, p. 3