--====57545153535049494955===1--
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Date: Mon, 3 Feb 1997 14:23:37 -1000
From: Maggie Percival
Subject: Hennins
Hi everyone,
Sarahj wrote>
>
>I was sitting her playing with my string and wire, and i was curious as
>to the 'infamous loop' I know it was there.. but I was wondering if it
>could have been twisted, in order to tighten the circumfrence to the
>hennin to hold it on the head.
> Being places directly under the back of the skull ( as a
>'catch' then when tightened to the middle of the head.
While on this subject has anyone else seen the Portrait of a Lady by
Rogier van der Weyden? The truncated hennin worn by the lady in this
painting is interesting in that it appears to have a wired tie that
starts near the top of the hennin and then comes down the side ending
up neatly fitting around the base of the ear. I've looked at a number
of other similar portraits of the period to see if any other lady has
this type of arrangement but have yet to find one. The van der Weyden
lady still has the little loop at the front of the hennin as well,
incidentally. Portrait of a Woman (by the same artist) also shows pins
that appear to be used to hold the veil in place, but given that the
hair would be bundled up inside the hennin it is not implausible that
such pins may have gone through to the hair and acted in the same way as
a hatpin.
--
Maggie Percival
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Date: Mon, 3 Feb 1997 06:03:39 -1000
From: David Key
Subject: Re: Hennin Construction
To: Multiple recipients of list H-COSTUME
Status: RO
X-Status:
Quick thoughts ...
> On Sun, 2 Feb 1997, Sara J. Davitt wrote:
>>
>> Hello!
>>
>> I was sitting her playing with my string and wire, and i was curious as
>> to the 'infamous loop' I know it was there.. but I was wondering if it
> Has anyone else ever heard/read that the 'infamous loop' was _not_ a
> counterbalance or understructure for the hennin?
>
> ... Some of the women's headdresses have the loop and some don't and she
> mentioned the ponytail girl with the black band with the loop all by
> itself. I've come across several other pictures with loops but no big
> headdresses since then.
> The one that I have at hand is Italian--c. 1465, Alesso Baldovinetti's
> _Portrait of a Lady in Yellow_. It's a profile with the loop going
> straight back into the woman's hair; perhaps to the scarf wrapped around
> her head like a headband. Since one can find loops with no hennins
> and almost as many pictures of hennins without a loop as with one, do you
> think there could be anything to that idea that they didn't really have
> anything to do with the structure or wearing of a hennin but were a
> totally separate accessory?
>
> Just wondering,
> lisa
I tend to agree with Lisa that the loop so often 'built-in' to the henin
in modern reconstructions is in fact a discrete piece of attire. However
I believe it IS an important element in the wearing of the henin.
In one of Memlinc's patinings (sorry can't remember which at the moment)
a number of young women/girls are shown with just the headband and the
central loop.
When you stop and think about it this all makes perfect sense ... if you
assume that the loop is the front of what is in essence a hat pin ...
1. The hairband holds the long hair back ... giving the high forehead
which was so fashionable.
2. The hairband also provides a secure basis on which to hold the henin
and kerchiefs.
3. The loop is the front portion of a pin (a pin which would fit this
description is included in the Museum of London's Dress Accessories
Book) which is pushed through the hennin, hairband and into the hair.
This would hold even this unstable headwear securely.
This is only a theory ... so any views ???
Cheers,
Dave
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Date: Sun, 2 Feb 1997 13:26:17 -1000
From: "Sara J. Davitt"
Subject: hennin construction.
To: Multiple recipients of list H-COSTUME
Hello!
I was sitting her playing with my string and wire, and i was curious as
to the 'infamous loop' I know it was there.. but I was wondering if it
could have been twisted, in order to tighten the circumfrence to the
hennin to hold it on the head.
Being places directly under the back of the skull ( as a
'catch' then when tightened to the middle of the head.
___
-- ---.-
- /
[ / <--- kinda like that is the ascii is decipherable.
\/ (it being the back of the head, the diagonal being where
| the wire would go.
I tried this, and I managed to keep it on without any discomfort or pins
through a great deall of household chores. It also would help to have
the hair up so that it wouldn't slip around.
Has anyone tried this?.. has it worked?
*curious*
Sarahj
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Date: Tue, 4 Feb 1997 11:27:00 -1000
From: Cynthia Virtue
Subject: Re: Hennin Construction
At 11:03 AM 2/3/97, David Key wrote:
>3. The loop is the front portion of a pin (a pin which would fit this
> description is included in the Museum of London's Dress Accessories
> Book) which is pushed through the hennin, hairband and into the hair.
> This would hold even this unstable headwear securely.
That is a very interesting idea! However, I'm not convinced that the pin
in Dress Accessories is that sort of pin, for two half-reasons. 1: Unless
I remember wrongly (my copy is loaned out at the moment) the pin in Dress
Accessories is not pointed/sharpened at the ends like a pin meant to go
through fabric. 2: I have seen pins exactly like this from China, recent
enough to be sold in antique stores, of gold, which are meant to be
'hairpins' -- also with blunted ends. Just prior to getting my copy of
Dress Accessories, I bought from the local drug store a metal hairpin meant
to be the main support for a chignon, which looks almost exactly like the
one in Dress Accessories, minus a few stylistic details.
So these reasons are "half-reasons" because I know they are not entirely
convincing; I'm not entirely convinced of them either. The idea of the
loop being a pin remains exceedingly intriguing, especially if combined
with the idea of the "headband" base arrangement -- which would make the
loop unneeded for counterbalancing.
As a side note, I do have a few pictures from the time which show the loop
as a triangle/angle rather than a loop.
Cynthia
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Date: Tue, 1 Jul 1997 05:27:45 -1000
To: [email protected]
From: Melanie Schuessler
Subject: H-COST: Re: Wimples and Veils during the middle ages
-Poster: Melanie Schuessler
Here are a couple of pieces of information that I remember from a research
paper and project that I did a few years ago on twelfth century gowns:
>>What was the reason for this custom [wearing wimple and veil]?
One of the reasons besides fashion that helped this headgear to stick
around was the Church's insistence that women's uncovered and flowing hair
was liable to incite lust. Remember that the Church was very powerful in
the centuries around this time--this was the era of the Crusades (I believe
the first one was in 1095, and they continued for a couple of centuries
thereafter).
>>What were the rules for this custom?
In some places there were sumptuary laws dealing with who might wear what.
The one law that I remember was in 12th-century France (sorry I can't be
more specific--the sources for this paper are several hundred miles away!).
It specified the length of the veil--the higher your rank, the longer it
could be. I remember that a queen could have hers at least to her knees,
and perhaps longer.
If anyone is interested in the paper, it can be found on my website at
http://labweb.soemadison.wisc.edu/users/schuessler
I haven't scanned a picture of the gown I made yet, but I plan to do so soon.
Cheers!
Melanie Schuessler
[email protected]
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Date: Tue, 1 Jul 1997 05:28:50 -1000
From: Melanie Schuessler
Subject: H-COST: Re: veils and wimples
-Poster: Melanie Schuessler
> the thing I'd also add is that in order to get those complicated shapes the
>veils were frequently pinned in place (using straight pins).
<...>
>she says that the trick to doing this is to wear another strip of cloth wrapped
under the chin and pinned at the top of the head, and then pin the veil/wimple to
that.
This is absolutely true--this is what I did for my "reconstruction" project
(mentioned in earlier post on this subject). The trick is to keep the
foundation band from slipping around on (or off!) your head. If you have
long hair, tie your hair back tightly and put some straight pins through
the band that catch some hair underneath before you start pinning the veil.
To get it really solid, put two pins in a "cross" so that both catch hair
underneath (do this on each side of your head and once on top). If you
have short hair (like me), don't wash it the night before so that it will
be a little stickier (yuck, I know, but it works, and it's period, too!).
Pin it down with bobby pins as much as you can (not period, I know, but
neither is short hair on women), and then hair spray generously to improve
the stickiness. If you feel that straight-pinning through your hair will
help (depends on how long your hair is), go ahead and do that. Can't hurt
(as long as no one pats you on the head).
By the way, (I'm sure this has been said at some point, but I'll say it
again) the expression "pin money" dates from this era. Straight pins were
relatively expensive, but they were necessary to hold headdresses together,
so some women got an allowance from their husband or father to buy them,
thus "pin money."
There is a painting that very clearly shows straight pins in a headdress
(later than the period discussed above, as there weren't many portrait
paintings done before the 13th century), but after much searching, I can't
find it! Does anyone know the one I'm thinking of??? A redrawing of Van
der Weyden's "Portrait of a Young Woman" (1435) in Blanche Payne's _History
of Costume_ suggests a straight pin. It's on page 242 of my edition (fig.
259), if anyone wants to look it up.
Cheers again!
Melanie Schuessler
[email protected]
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Date: Tue, 1 Jul 1997 10:08:47 -1000
From: Ninni M Pettersson
Subject: Re: H-COST: Re: veils and wimples
-Poster: Ninni M Pettersson
At 16.28 +0100 97-07-01, Melanie Schuessler wrote:
>There is a painting that very clearly shows straight pins in a headdress
>(later than the period discussed above, as there weren't many portrait
>paintings done before the 13th century), but after much searching, I can't
>find it! Does anyone know the one I'm thinking of??? A redrawing of Van
>der Weyden's "Portrait of a Young Woman" (1435) in Blanche Payne's _History
>of Costume_ suggests a straight pin. It's on page 242 of my edition (fig.
>259), if anyone wants to look it up.
Perhaps you're thinking of the painting of a young woman attributed to
Robert Campin, from sometime late 14th - early 15th century? (I don't know
what it's called, the inferior Swedish book it's printed in doesn't list
such trivial things, but claims that it is located in the National Gallery
in London.) It shows a young woman completely swathed in several layers of
veil and wimple, and on her forehead you can clearly see two straight pins.
/Ninni Pettersson
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Date: Wed, 2 Jul 1997 05:35:31 -1000
Subject: Re: H-COST: Re: veils and wimples
Sender: [email protected]
-Poster: [email protected]
In a message dated 97-07-02 02:11:21 EDT, [email protected] (Melanie
Schuessler) writes:
> There is a painting that very clearly shows straight pins in a headdress
> (later than the period discussed above, as there weren't many portrait
> paintings done before the 13th century), but after much searching, I can't
> find it! Does anyone know the one I'm thinking of??? A redrawing of Van
> der Weyden's "Portrait of a Young Woman" (1435) in Blanche Payne's
_History of Costume_ suggests a straight pin. It's on page 242 of my edition (fig.
259), if anyone wants to look it up.
>
The actual Van der Weyden (as opposed to a re-drawing) is reproduced in huge
closeup (of the face and immediate surroundings) on the cover of "The Art of
the Portrait" by Norbert Schneider (Taschen, 1994). There is definitely one
pin showing in that, with a little gold ball for the pin head. The whole
thing is reproduced rather smaller (but still in color) on page 40 of the
same book. You can still see several straight pins creating the elaborate
drape to the headdress. (The same page includes the other van der Weyden of
the lady (1465) with the black gown and red belt, and a transparent veil
pinned to her hair over a black caul.
MaggiRos
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Date: Wed, 2 Jul 1997 06:16:46 -1000
Subject: H-COST: c15th Veils & Pins - online pictures
-Poster: [email protected]
Dear All
Melanie Schuessler wrote:
>There is a painting that very clearly shows straight pins in a headdress
>(later than the period discussed above, ...
>... Does anyone know the one I'm thinking of??? an
Melanie one of these may be what you were thinking of ...
http://www.yawp.com/cjackson/weyden/p-weyden12.htm
or
http://www.yawp.com/cjackson/weyden/p-weyden16.htm
...which both show potraits of Young women in fashionable dress with
a truncated hennin & veil pinned in place.
> Perhaps you're thinking of the painting of a young woman attributed to
> Robert Campin, from sometime late 14th - early 15th century?
Ninni,
I think the picture you are referring to by Campin (Master of Femalle)
is online at ...
http://www.yawp.com/cjackson/c/p-campin5.htm
You can clearly see the pins going across the top of the kerchief
Campin was born in th c14th but ther pictures are definitely c15th
As a by-the-way the online pics come from the excellent CJFA Virtual
Art Museum maintained by Carol Gerten-Jackson
Cheers
Dave
back