Fertilizer
Management Program
Note: Consulting Scientist/Engineering Reports are available in the Falmouth Public Library and the East Branch Library
“Separate proposals for the Optional Scope of Work should address in abbreviated form the points set forth in Sections V, VII, VIII…” change note in italics.
Comparative Evaluation Criteria:
A. Proposal Evaluation [50% of total score]:
1.
Responds to the scope of work. – 25%
Highly Advantageous. The proposer clearly understands the scope of work and articulates such understanding in a narrative and the project proposal clearly meets the defined scope. .
Advantageous. The proposer understands the scope of services and articulates such understanding in the narrative.
Not Advantageous. The proposer does not understand the scope of work
2.
Management control plan. 25% Includes the
qualifications and experience of key professionals, demonstrated ability to
administer a project of this scope, and availability or methods of acquiring
required resources.
Highly Advantageous. The proposal provides a clear hierarchy of staffing and responds to the scope of services with the skill sets and staffing levels or subcontractors of trained professional to achieve its objectives.
Advantageous. The proposal provides a clear hierarchy of personnel or subcontractors and provides appropriately skilled personnel.
Not Advantageous. The proposal does not provide adequate or appropriately trained personnel or subcontractors to carry out the scope of work.
B. Interview/ Reference Evaluation [50% of total score]:
1. Presentation 30% Includes content, style and effectiveness of the presentation, and demonstrated interest of key professionals
2. References
20%
Highly Advantageous. The proposer provides references for ten to twenty similar products for similar clients.
Advantageous. The proposer provides references five to nine similar products for similar clients.
Not Advantageous. The proposer provides less than five references for similar products for similar clients.
August 29, 2001