Hello,
All though this doesnt have much to do with science, it does have to
do with AIG so I figured I would post it here. This is half a rebutal
to their article and half just venting about some of the things that
AIG says about Evolutionists. Especially when they have such a hypocritical
view of morals.
The article can be found here, http://www.answersingenesis.org/docs/4183cen_d1999.asp
And of course, quotes from the article are in blue.
Why would young people kill, destroy and
bomb in a suicide attack?
This is a complicated question, However I believe their reasoning was
that they wanted to get revenge on those people who treated them badly
because they were different. Revenge against the popular kids for making
their lives hell. So maybe people, including christians, should think
about what they are doing when they are treating people badly. As kids
at the school were catalysts to these kids behavior.
They were also fascinated by the German
Nazi belief, fuelled by ideas of Darwinian struggle, in a master
race.2
Well, Evolution (which I assume what is ment by darwinian struggle)
is about adapting to the current environment. Since the environment
always changes, a Master Race would not hold for too long.
But then, AIG isnt great with understanding evolution to begin with.
We could also get into how religion and christianity was a part of Nazi
Germany but I wont. :)
I do question the point of citing an AIG article to support an AIG claim.
What was meant by Natural Selection?
One newspaper reporter has linked the T shirts inscription to
a video game of the same name, which is promoted as a place where
survival of the fittest takes a very literal meaning
its
the natural way, its Natural Selection.1
Of course, if these kids were correctly taught Natural Selection in
school, then they would have realized that they failed the survival
of the fittest. Since how you determine who survives is who has children
and continues their line on. These kids unfortunatly didnt.
In groping for answers to this and other tragedies, more and more
people are expressing surprise and concern at the increasing glee with
which many teenagers approach depictions of violence.
Your right it was so much better in the past when people and teenager
approached stonings, Witch burnings and Hangings with glee. Cheering
on the deaths of people, many of who didnt deserve it.
Ill take the glee of fake violence, over the glee of real violence anyday.
This does cause problems where people cant differentiate from the fake
violence and real violence. Luckily this is rare. And its part of a
larger psycological problem.
However, this fixation with death is hardly surprising given that
most public schools in Western nations now teach that violence and death
are natural evolutionary mechanisms...
Just as the literal bible teachers, that violence and death are natural
things and sometimes they come from god as well.
Death is a natural evolutionary deselection mechanism. In where a death
of an organism that didnt propogate means their personal genetic
traits will not be included into the evolutionary chain of events.
...that have operated with chance processes
to produce man over millions of years.
Of course, evolution isnt random or "Chance."
Having been told since childhood that man
is just an animal,...
As opposed to the literal version of genesis where man comes from Sinful
Dirt (Adam and Eve, were created from dust, then sinned. We are told
that we all carry the punishment of their sin).
...that death and violence are a natural
part of evolution and that only the fittest survive, it
is no wonder that this generation of young people are wallowing in utter
hopelessness...
Often the fittest are those that dont rock the boat. Those
that dont oppose the environment. That would include not going against
our social environment.
Even when they hear Jesus loves you,
many either do not understand what this can possibly mean in a world
of death and randomness, or it makes them more angry and bitter
that such a beautiful possibility seems denied by the facts
of science.
I would Love to see the facts of science that say Jesus
can not love them.
What Nonsense. Science does not deny any sort of Love.
Many of these people are walking time-bombs, without
fear of any judgment after death, and primed to explode in anger and
hatred at any time.
So God has been reduced to someone who should be feared? There are many
who dont believe in Judgment after death, yet they treat others well.
I would be curious to look further into the causes of this Anger and
Hatred. (I looked into some of it at the bottom of the page.)
How can we Christians help defuse these
bombs? Christ is indeed the answer, but in our evolutionized
society, reaching these young people requires that the church understands
and utilizes the truth about our origins.
Its funny AIG should talk about Truth about our origins
while they use false arguments to support their truth
The true and accurate Genesis account of
history enables young and old to understand why this is a groaning and
violence-filled world that death, bloodshed, disease
and suffering are a consequence of sin but that God
so loved the world that He provided His Son as a sacrifice for our sin.
And yet this sacrifice didnt get ride of Groaning and a violence
filled world, it only gave people hope after death.
Our young people need to know that they
are made in the image of God, are sinners separated from their Creator,
but can be saved for eternity, and know purpose and meaning in life,
through Jesus Christ our Lord.
And that believing in evolution does not destroy their belief in Jesus
Christ.
So as you can see evolutionary thought is not what caused
this problem. Attempts to blame Evolution for their actions is IMHO
rather despicable. :)
Addition:
I found some more information about columbine and school shootings
in general
Based on the ages from school shootings
between 1996 and 2001 the Average age of the shooter was 14. (http://www.religioustolerance.org/sch_vio4.htm)
This mean they were generally in either 8th or 9th grade (9th grade
being a freshmen in high school). They have either started teaching
evolution at a much younger age, or these kids didnt know much about
Evolution, suggesting that it is not a factor in school shootings.
"Dan Savage
of "the Stranger.com" wrote a shocking article describing
his personal experiences and observations while he went to high school.
4 Savage was apparently targeted as a geek by fellow students. Some
of his comments are:
"...in none of my [3] high schools did I for a moment feel safe.
High school was terrifying, and it was the casual cruelty of the popular
kids -- the jocks and the princesses -- that made it hell."
"...I lived in fear of the small slights and public humiliations
used to reinforce the rigid high school caste system: poor girls were
sluts, soft boys were fags. And at each of my schools, there were students
who lived in daily fear of physical violence."
"I was f--ked with enough to spend four years fantasizing about
blowing up my high school and everyone in it."
Fortunately, he never acted out his fantasies."
http://www.religioustolerance.org/sch_vio7.htm
I
also found this note left by the Columbine shooters very interesting
as far as their motives.
"By now, it's over. If you are reading this,
my mission is complete.... Your children who have ridiculed me, who
have chosen not to accept me, who have treated me like I am not worth
their time are dead. THEY ARE F--KING DEAD...."
"Surely you will try to blame it on the clothes I wear, the music
I listen to, or the way I choose to present myself, but no. Do not hide
behind my choices. You need to face the fact that this comes as a result
of YOUR CHOICES."
"Parents and teachers, you f--ked up. You have taught these kids
to not accept what is different. YOU ARE IN THE WRONG. I have taken
their lives and my own -- but it was your doing. Teachers, parents,
LET THIS MASSACRE BE ON YOUR SHOULDERS UNTIL THE DAY YOU DIE."
http://www.religioustolerance.org/sch_vio7.htm
So we should question whether "evolution" was the cause,
or if being ridiculed and tortured all their life by people who didnt
accept people who were different was. They commited a horrible crime
that they are responsible for But they were driven to it by people who
wanted to ridicule them and treat them bad because they were different.
Instead of trying to blame a theory in science, maybe we should look
at the way we act and the way we treat people, and realize that we can
have a bad effect on them. Maybe we should Do unto others as we would
have them do unto us.
-Ari
Last Update 8/10/03
©03 Ari
Back to Main Page
|