HOMINIDAE

ANCESTRIES OF THE MAN IN THE POSTAL STAMPS

 

Australopithecus (Paranthropus) africanus

Australopithecus africanus

Australopithecus (Paranthropus) africanus, 1938 Robert Broom

It is in 1938 that Robert Broom discovered in Kromdraai in South Africa a specimen more robust than the specimens discovered previously which was first of all identified with a new classification; Paranthropus robustus. Came then a multitude from discovered not only to the South but also to the East, which one classified in this taxon. With the number of discovered which increased one reclassified the whole of the found specimens; those of the East Africa being named A. boisei or A. aethiopicus and those of the south, the A. robustus.


The majority of the researchers consider that the A. robustus to some extent replaced the A. africanus in South Africa As its name indicates it, the robustus was more robust than her predecessor; at least at the cranio-facial level and the level of teeth. Its cranium is more massive and is equipped with a sagittal peak and nuchale (occipital). Its cranial capacity is on average 530cc, but a pneumatisation of the cranial bone reduced the weight of the larger head. Its face is shorter, more massive with apparent former pillars, a thicker mandible. Its temporal pits are widened following the development of the temporal muscle.

It is in 1938 that Robert Broom discovered in Kromdraai in South Africa a specimen more robust than the specimens discovered previously which was first of all identified with a new classification; Paranthropus robustus. Came then a multitude from discovered not only to the South but also to the East, which one classified in this taxon. With the number of discovered which increased one reclassified the whole of the found specimens; those of the East Africa being named A. boisei or A. aethiopicus and those of the south, the A. robustus.

 
A. africanus existed between 3 and 2 million years ago. It is similar to afarensis, and was also bipedal, but body size was slightly greater. Brain size may also have been slightly larger, ranging between 420 and 500 cc. This is a little larger than chimp brains (despite a similar body size), but still not advanced in the areas necessary for speech. The back teeth were a little bigger than in afarensis. Although the teeth and jaws of africanus are much larger than those of humans, they are far more similar to human teeth than to those of apes (Johanson and Edey 1981). The shape of the jaw is now fully parabolic, like that of humans, and the size of the canine teeth is further reduced compared to afarensis.

 

 

Hosted by www.Geocities.ws

1