FINAL NOTE

The proposed new theory is consistent with Classical Physics, Photon’s Physics, the Einstein E=mc² formula, Planck E=hυ formula and the De Broglie relation, although some corrections must be made.

It disagrees with Einstein’s Relativity Theory, the “Quantum Physics” based on the “Wave Mechanics Theory”, the Electromagnetic Wave Theory, the Rutherford-Bohr model of the atom and today’s subatomic “Standard Model” based on the Quarks Theory.

Some not good interpretations of some experiments and very bad unlucky coincidences have happened in the past and they make everyone think wrong.

May be the worst unhappy one is the De Broglie's proposition of a wave associated to matter that derived in the Schrödinger's equation and the Wave Mechanics Theory.

It was a very bad coincidence that the formula he proposed seemed to be confirmed by a later experiment and seemed to prove the theory while the formula is valid because of another physical phenomenon.

Something similar happens with Einstein's Relativity Theory.

If these didn't happen the history of Physics would have been totally different.

I have discovered those unlucky and unhappy errors and how to solve them, but I'm an Electrical Engineer not a Physicist. Is up to real physicists to take my work and develop a "New Physics". My work should be understood as a start-point. That's why I'm presenting the new theories here. It should be considered as I have solved the "engineering part" of the theories.

I have no more time, no more resources and no expertise to develop it further.