SUMMARY
New theories about light, the elementary particles and the basic forces of nature are proposed.
The experiments of Michelson-Morley, Davisson-Germer, Feynman, Kaufmann, Hertz and Fizeau are analyzed with a new point of view.
The mystery of "wave-particle duality" is solved!
The real structures of light, photons, electrons, neutrinos, protons, neutrons and the atom are revealed.
The theories are presented in a very concise, precise and simple style.
Manuscript final version of february, 2010
(Things corrected, things changed and new things developed since the first version.)
A NEW LIGHT IN PHYSICS
Here are saved the related pages cited in the manuscript as web links references just for the case they would not be available any more at the original web sites: SAVED REFERENCED WEB PAGES
ACKNOWLEDGMENT: To the internet community without which this work would have not been possible!
THE NEW EVIDENCE (PROOFS):
Section 1.1- item A: The perfect problem that shows Relativity INCONSISTENCY
Appendix A: The real Equation of Force is F = ma
Section 7.1: "Electromagnetic waves" do not exist!
Section 1.1 item D: Absolute Magnetic Force
A PROPOSED FEASIBLE EXPERIMENT THAT CAN PROVE A GREAT PART OF THE THEORIES:
Section 6.3: The experiment at high velocities
Section 6.4: The experiment as a proof
PARTICLES DETECTED IN HIGH ENERGY PHYSICS ARE PREDICTED THEORETICALLY:
Section 4.11: Experimentally detected particles
THE NEW INTERPRETATIONS FOR "RELATIVISTIC" PHENOMENA:
Section 1.1-E: Summary
Appendix B-A: Mercury Precession
Appendix B-B: About "time dilation"
Appendix B-C: Bending of light
ABOUT COSMOLOGY:
Appendix_E: About Hubble red-shift, Universe Expansion and the Big Bang
The
printed book "A New Light In Physics" in its
february/2010
final
version is available at:
Direct link:
Published by:
FORUMS ONLINE:
It was very important the possibility of being able to participate at the "open" Physics Forums on the web which luckily allowed to post the links of my web-pages:
"SCI Forums" "The Science Forum" "Hypography forums" "PhysForums"
Some corrections in the original manuscript mainly in Section 1.1 were made thanks to some honest criticisms I could find. Section 1.1-A "The perfect problem that shows Relativity inconsistency", Section 1.1-D "Absolute Magnetic Force" and Appendix A "The real Equation of Force is F=ma" were developed with the inspiration originated while trying to give support to my expressed disagreement with Relativity Theory.
Section 4.6 about Feynman experiment and Section 5,5 about Quantum Tunneling are interpretations of those phenomena that surged when they were presented as possible "stones" to the proposed theories and were incorporated to the manuscript.
Cites:
"Sometimes we don't see what we don't want to see."
"Sometimes we don't find what we are not looking for."
I CANNOT MAKE IT ALL!
I already had a very hard work. Still much work remains to
be done. Many things wait for a definitely proof. Many things wait to be
developed further. Some new experiments must be done.
A list of some further developments that would be
needed by the new theory is presented in the
“Further Developments” section.
My work is a guide to new theories. If they are right a
totally new Physics can rise.
You could participate
in its development.
I believe there are a lot of very interesting things to be done.
Of course to begin you have to think first in the possibility that the
new theories could be right.
"BLOWING AWAY"
What I'm blowing away are some not good interpretations of some experiments and very bad unlucky coincidences that made everyone think wrong for a century.
May be the worst unhappy one is the De Broglie's proposition of a wave associated to
matter that derived in the Schrödinger's equation and the Wave Mechanics Theory.
It was a very bad coincidence that the formula he proposed seemed to be
confirmed by a later experiment and seemed to prove the theory while the formula
is valid because of another physical phenomenon!
Something similar happens with Einstein's Relativity Theory.
If these didn't happen the history of Physics would have been totally different.
That's what I'm blowing away, very bad, unlucky and unhappy coincidences that
make everybody think wrong.
I have discovered those unlucky and unhappy errors and how to correct them, but
I'm an Electrical Engineer not a Physicist. Is up to real physicists to take my work
and develop a "New Physics". My work should be understood as a start-point.
That's why I'm presenting the new theories here. It
should be considered as I have solved the "engineering part" of the theories.
I want to point now that I did have "formal training". I made Electrical
Engineering where I learned about the formalities and rigors that must be applied
particularly in Mathematics, Physics, Mechanics, Electricity and Magnetism.
After all my theories are all about Electricity and Magnetism!
The new theories haven't been proven yet!
For now is only a very consistent theory that explain all the main experiments
already done, even those which only Relativity
explains.
I have no more time, no more resources and no capability to develop it further. I'm claiming for physicists to take that work and develop it
further. I cannot do that.
The theories have very strong and consistent arguments. They deserve the
opportunity to be analyzed by more expert minds.
The theories are ready to be analyzed scientifically by the Scientific community.
They fill all the mathematical and physical rigor requirements I could verify but I know I'm not infallible (by the way, I make mistakes may be everyday...) and the possibility that "adjustments" could be needed exist.
The presented propositions could become new laws of Physics after approved scientifically in form and content.
I want to say something:
Anyone can write anything that can be related someway to the new theories and cite my work just if they want and find appropriated. It must be his/her decision and not mine.
THE BACK COVER:
“This schizophrenic attribute of the electromagnetic waves, the wave-particle duality, as was denominated, resulted in a dangerous conceptual obstacle for some years even for the more creative and original minds and still is for almost all the students. Perhaps while the subject advances it will become less confuse and more rational; all we can say is that the nature is revealed to us this way”.
Frank J. Blatt - 1991
Now the mystery is solved!
This book present a set of new splendid theories that determines a highly consistent and precise new Physics for light, the elementary particles and the basic fields and forces of nature.
THE FINAL NOTE:
The new theories are consistent with Classical Physics, Photon’s Physics, the Einstein E=mc2 formula, Planck E=hυ formula and the De Broglie relation, although some corrections must be made.
It disagrees with Einstein’s Relativity Theory, the “Quantum Physics” based on the “Wave Mechanics Theory”, the Electromagnetic Wave Theory, the Rutherford-Bohr model of the atom and today’s subatomic “Standard Model” based on the Quarks Theory.
CITE:
“Classical Physics is coming back, RELOADED!
With some corrections, some new laws and the right structures for the elementary particles it really works now.”
alejandro.martillo@hotmail.com
Site initiated in January 2005
