Letter to Prof C.Hapgood from Lorenzo W.Burroughs Captain, USAF Chief, Cartographic Section 8th Reconnasissance Technical Sqdn (SAC) Westover, Mass.

Charles Hapgood enclosed a copy of this letter from the USAF cartographic section regarding the Piri Reis map and its construction in his book, "Maps of the Ancient Sea Kings". This letter if valid is informative as it lends external validity to Hapgood's thesis that these maps could only have been constructed when the ice cover on Antarctica was absent. The problem is that the Antarctic ice cover is supposed to be millions of years old. I am interested in affirming the accuracy of these claims and would like to hear from anyone who knows if Prof Hapgoods theory has been evaluated by any other cartographers; or if anyone knows of any research or publications on these maps and/or this letter or Hapgood's theory.

" It is not very often that we have the opportunity to evaluate maps of ancient origin. The Piri Reis ( AD 1513 ) and the Oronteus Fineaus [sic] ( AD 1531 ) maps sent to us by you, presented a delightful challenge for it was not readily conceivable that they could be so accurate without being forged. With added enthusiasm we accepted this challenge and have expended many off duty hours evaluating your manuscript and the above maps. I am sure you will be pleased to know that we have concluded that both of these maps were compiled from accurate original source maps, irrespective of dates. The following is a brief summary of our findings:
A. The solution of the portolano projection used by Admiral Piri Reis, developed by your class in Anthropology must be very nearly correct; for when known geographical locations are checked in relationship to the grid computed by Mr. Richard W. Strachan ( MIT ), there, is remarkably close agreement. Piri Reis' use of the Portolano projection ( centred on Syene, Egypt ) is an excellent choice, for it is a developable surface that would permit the relative size and shape of the earth at that ( lattitude ) to be retained. It is our opinion that those who compiled the original map had an excellent knowledge of the continents covered by this map.
B. As stated by Colonel Harold Z. Ohlmeyer in his letter ( July 6, 1960 ) to you, the Princess Martha Coast of Queen Maud Land, Antarctica, appears to be truly represented on the southern sector of the Piri Reis Map. The agreement of the Piri Reis map with the seismic profile of this area made by the Norwegian-British -Swedish Expedition of 1949, suported by your solution of the grid, places beyond a reasonable doubt the conclusion that the original source maps must have been made before the present Antarctic ice cap covered Queen Maud Land coasts.
C. It is our opinion that the accuracy of the cartographic features shown in the Oronteus Fineaus [sic] Map ( AD 1530 ) suggests, beyond a doubt, that it also was compiled from accurate source maps of Antarctica, but in this case of the entire continent. Close examination has proved the original source maps must have been compiled at a time when the land mass and inland waterways of the continent were relatively free of ice. This conclusion is further supported by a comparison of the Oronteus Finneaus [sic] Map with the results obtained by International Geophysical Year teams in their measurements of the subglacial topography. The comparison also suggests that the original source maps ( compiled in remote antiquity ) were prepared when Antarctica was presumably free of ice. The Cordiform projection used by Oronteus Fineaus [sic] suggests the use of advanced mathematics. Further, the shape given to the Antarctic continent suggests the possibility, if not the probability, that the original source maps were compiled on a stereographic or gnomonic type of projection ( involving the use of spherical trigonometry ).
D. We are convinced that the findings made by you and your associates are valid, and that they raise extremely important questions affecting geology and ancient history, questions which certainly require further investigation.
We thank you for extending us the opportunity to have participated in the study of these maps. The following officers and airmen vollunteered their time to assist Captain Lorenzo W.Burroughs in this evaluation: Captain Richard E. Covault, CWO Howard D.Minor, MSgt Clifton M.Dover, MSgt DAvid C.Carter, TSgt James H.Hood, SSgt James L.Carroll, and AIC Don R.Vance."
Lorenzo W.Burroughs
Captain, USAF
Chief, Cartographic Section
8th Reconnaissance Technical Sqdn ( SAC )
Westover, Mass.

Discussion

I included this letter which Hapgood enclosed in his book because there has been a rather odd lack of interest in proving either its validity or its falsehood. Due to the claims being made here, one would think that anyone capable of reveiwing these claims could cause an international sensation. And yet... there has been silence except for dismissals of Hapgood as an eccentric. My open question to anyone who reads this page is as follows:
If.. this letter is genuine why would several independent cartographic staff associated with the United States Air Force have supported Hapgood's theory if the theory had no supporting evidence? To accept that the letter is a fraud is to raise the issue of how Prof Hapgood could ever have wished to pass such a fraud not to mention his legal liability. In conclusion it remains a possibility that his theory regarding the compilation of these maps was supported by a large group of persons ( 7 ), familiar with cartographic analysis. Are we to conclude that Captain Burroughs and his team were also eccentric and unable to verify what is essentially a mathematical procedure? My final conclusion is that unless this letter is proved to be a fraud this document leaves Cartographers, Geologists, and Historians with several extremely important questions; where are the answers?

Maps of The Ancient Sea Kings Charles Hapgood, Late Prof of the History of Science at Keene State College New Hampshire, Pub by Turnstone press London 1979.

Main Page
Hosted by www.Geocities.ws

1 1