Water & Sanitation


Up ] Capacity Building ] Children ] Economic Issues ] Education ] Health Section ] Nutrition ] [ Water & Sanitation ]

 

Home
Up

Water and Environmental Sanitation

 

With increases in populations, the pressure on the environment is demanding improvement in the management of this finite resource (Smet, Hyde). Better cooperation between agencies is important in response to emergencies such as floods (Bradbury). Incentives can also make a difference in controlling natural disasters such as desertification (Wasteneys).

 

 

Author(s):         Abou-Bakr, H.

Title:                 Impact Evaluation Report on Desert Farming Systems (Egypt) III.  “Integrated Farming Systems for Productive Use of Arid Land.  Phase Three: On-Farm and Back Up Research and Demonstration.”

Source:             IDRC Evaluation Report, 1997 ([email protected];www.idrc.ca/evaluation)

Key Words:     project evaluation, arid zone, on-farm research, farming systems, cultivation practices, crop rotation, Egypt, IDRC

Reviewer:         IDRC Evaluation Unit

Description:   

The Desert Farming Systems Project (DFSP) was undertaken in Egypt to improve the productivity of the virgin desert sandy soil, and to develop suitable desert farming systems for management by small holders and co-operatives.  Phase III of the project focused on improving farming systems in newly-reclaimed desert lands through on-farm demonstration, crop rotation, fertilisation, tillage and irrigation.  This evaluation assesses the impact of the Desert Farming Systems (Egypt) Phase III project.

Most of the research results obtained throughout this project in its three phases have furnished the basis for other research and development projects at the Desert Development Centre (DDC), including the Model farms, the Horticulture/Fodder/sheep model farm, and the Fodder/Animal Research project.

Although all the farmers who worked with DFSP have ceased field crop cultivation and have transformed their lands into horticulture, the project did have positive impacts. During the period from November 1994 to May 1997, fifteen training sessions were organized in the training centre in South Tahrir Station, attended by 1274 trainees.  The problem of soil infestation by plant parasitic nematodes was solved, and farmers can now better manage weed problems through the different practices extended to them by project staff.  During the implementation of the On-Farm Demonstration Programme the yield of groundnuts increased as a result of the application of the inputs package suggested by the project. Alfalfa proved to be the best fodder crop in the desert, and it is now grown successfully on the DDC farm.  Five cuts/season can be harvested, and animals reared in the farm (mainly 500 heads of Barki sheep) depend entirely on alfalfa production.  Alfalfa is now cultivated in many other desert areas in Egypt.

In addition to farming practices, the DDC attempted to introduce biogas, solar energy and types of desert architecture.  The two types of houses built in the DDC farm, and the biogas and solar heaters, dryers and cookers are, however, still not applicable.  It seems that this area needs more research at the technical and socio-economic levels.  Farmers in the area are still building their houses using the same way of building in the cities, although they complain that these houses are very hot in summer and very cold in winter.

 

Author(s):         Abou-Bakr, H.

Title:                 Impact Evaluation Report on Integrated Pest Management

Source:             IDRC Evaluation Report, 1997 ([email protected];www.idrc.ca/evaluation)

Key Words:     project evaluation, pesticides, cultivation practices, on-farm research, maize, pest control, plant production, environmental effects, agricultural extension, integrated approach, training, Egypt, IDRC

Reviewer          IDRC Evaluation Unit

Description:     

The Integrated Pest Management Project involved the development and evaluation of  an integrated pest management (IPM) system for corn, in view of reducing pesticide use, decreasing health and environmental damage, and increasing the income of corn growers in Egypt.  This evaluation assessed the project’s impact.

The package of cultural practices provided by the project has led to increasing corn productivity and in turn higher farm income.  The reduction of pesticide amounts on corn has not only allowed safer fodder for farm animals, and corn grain with less pesticide residue, but has also led to a reduction in production costs, of great benefit to small farmers, especially under the application of structural adjustment programs (SAP), which raise the price of inputs.  The designed cultural package is considered a good step to the Low External Input Agriculture (LEIA).  Farmers working directly or indirectly with the project team have a greater awareness of the environment, and now  recognise the role of predacious insects in corn fields in decreasing the numbers of harmful insects.  The working atmosphere created by the project has encouraged several farmers to take initiatives to solve problems in their fields.  These are impressive innovations which should be followed and developed.

There is an increasing trend among farmers in El Beheira to adopt the package provided by the IPM project for corn cultivation, with pest control strategy becoming more dependent on biological and cultural methods rather than chemical pesticides.  The same might be said regarding corn varieties, planting dates, irrigation; and other farming practices.  At the national level, there is already a strong endeavour by the Ministry of Agriculture to reduce pesticide application and encourage the use of environment-friendly pest control methods.  The impact of the present project on this area is an indirect and long-term one.  More important is the possibility to increase productivity of the land unit through modification of farming practices and the introduction of new appropriate technologies and techniques.  This has significant implications for Egyptian agriculture which suffers from the scarcity of cultivable land. 

The project has a positive impact on the agro-ecosystem and the environment in general.  Modification of planting methods (in rows) has resulted in a reduction in the amount of irrigation water, vital under Egyptian conditions.  Populations of natural enemies in the fields where the  project package is applied have increased considerably, leading to a more balanced agro-ecosystem.  The production of corn grains and green fodder free of - or at least with less - pesticide is of great positive import for human and animal health, non-target organisms and the rural environment in general.

 

Author(s):         Black, R., and Sessay, M.F.

Title:     Refugees and environmental change in West Africa: the role of institutions

Source: Journal of International Development 10, 699-713, 1998

Key words:      refugees, migration, institutional reform, Senegal, Guinea

Description: 

Africa is host to hundreds of thousands of refugees, with very real associated threats of conflict over scarce resources. This paper examines the relationship between forced migration and environmental change in West Africa.

The Authors analyze the changing institutional context through which resource use and management decisions are made.  They use case studies of refugee influxes in Senegal and the Republic of Guinea, where despite significant increases in the population of host areas, degradation of natural resources has remained limited.  They draw from the work of Leach and Mearns (1991), who have highlighted how institutions shape the ways in which different groups of people gain access to and control over resources, and in doing so, affect environmental outcomes.

Their principal aim was to consider what institutions exist (in the context of Senegal and Guinea) that are relevant to natural resource use and environmental change.  Secondly, they consider whether these institutions have been able to cope with rapid population increase caused by the presence of refugees; and thirdly the specific involvement of refugees both formally within institutional structures and also in respecting rules of behavior established by various institutions.

They evaluate institutions at the international, national and local levels.  At the international level, there is an increasing range of institutions that have taken up the cause of environmental or refugee protection, and intervene locally to promote laws and practices that conserve natural resources.   At the national level, government departments dealing with environmental issues have been increasingly receiving external support to continue conservation efforts.  At the local level, the institutionalization of conservation efforts needs to be supported through formal administrative structures, keeping in mind traditional and successful conservation efforts.

In both Senegal and Guinea, there was a flexibility of institutions to absorb new populations.  Access to institutions and to resources were not denied to the incoming populations, ensuring a lack of widespread abuses of natural resources that could have led to degradation.  Finally, international aid has been structured in such a way that environmental impacts have been dispersed, conflicts on the environment were not exacerbated, and local institutional structures were built up rather than undermined.

The Authors caution that the status quo of refugees, vis-à-vis the host population is not necessarily stable or desirable from an environmental or equity point of view.  The potential for conflict and competition over land use and development is very real.  Nevertheless, it is to be expected that the adaptability of various institutions will contribute greatly to the way in which these future problems are resolved or perpetuated.

 

Author(s):         Bradbury, M., and Coultan, V.

Title:     Somalia inter-agency flood response operation phase I: November-December 1997

Source: UNICEF, Somalia Support Centre/Governments of Sweden, USA, UK, 1988

Key words:      emergency, flood, programme evaluation, Somalia.

Description:     

This report evaluates the first phase of the Somalia Inter-Agency Flood Response Operation that occurred between November and December 1997.  This operation was a complex and expensive logistics operation to distribute emergency assistance to scattered and isolated flood-affected populations.  It was also a test of the international humanitarian system’s capacity to respond to an acute emergency in a country that has been without a government for six years.  It involved coordination and collaboration among seven UN agencies, European Community Humanitarian Office (ECHO), International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) and 19 international and Somali NGOs, with funding and support by 17 donor governments. There is an exhaustive list of agencies and people involved at the two main levels of the humanitarian context (in and out) of Somalia in an annex.

The framework of the humanitarian framework for Somalia was reviewed.  Key areas related to disaster (rapid onset emergency) that were assessed in detail were: preparedness, early warning system, coordination, assessment, response implementation, supplies, security, operational principles, working with local structures, Somali responses, building capacity, media and public information, funding and response effectiveness.

On the whole, this complex operation was evaluated as a success.  An initial objective, to ‘rescue’ flood-affected populations was not fulfilled.  Objectives to ameliorate the immediate humanitarian effects of the floods and avert a nutritional and health crisis in the worst affected areas were, by and large, achieved.  This operation gave an opportunity to apply past lessons learned from working in Somalia and to apply innovative programming in several areas.

Most of the principal findings that were reported were on areas that could have made the operation less costly and more efficient.  These included: development of inter-sectoral strategies to deal with future emergencies, securing advance commitments for rapid onset emergencies, maintenance of a “rolling preparedness” planning process and the establishment and maintenance of a strategic stockpile of emergency equipment and materials in East Africa. 

Some recommendations on issues of security and operational principles were that all personnel had to receive full security briefing, and new personnel should receive thorough introduction to political and sociological issues in Somalia, supported by written materials.  The evaluators noted an absence of guiding principles for international humanitarian engagement in Somalia, and recommended that one be formulated in a consultative process.

 

Authors:           Hyde, K.A.L., and Jespersen, C.B.

Title:     Karonga lakeshore integrated rural groundwater supply project - village level maintenance:  Third Sociological and Technical Monitoring Report

Source:             Centre for Social Research, University of Malawi, Zomba, 1994.

Keywords:       water, sanitation, health education, participation, gender, Malawi, DANIDA

Reviewer:         Patricia Hari, Kenya

Description:     

The Karonga Lakeshore Integrated Rural Groundwater Supply Project is a collaborative effort between the Government of Malawi and DANIDA.  It involves the installation of water points to provide accessible, clean and potable water to the study population and integrates components of sanitation and health education.  The ultimate aim was a steadily decreasing involvement of the donors and government and transferring ownership of the project to the recipient communities.  An important step in this process was the establishment of a community based (village level) operation and maintenance (VLOM) system for the water points. 

This report summarizes the results of a formative evaluation of the projects’ progress in achieving this aim.  The report relied on both a sociological exercise (carried out by an evaluation team) and regular technical monitoring exercises which were an integral part of the work of project staff.  The sociological aspect of these exercises focused on the level of success in promoting understanding of VLOM; the level of developed skills; the establishment and viability of community institutions for VLOM; the level of institutional support and the dissemination and utilization of the messages promoted by the project and supporting institutions.

Data collection methods included observation, focus group discussions, open-ended interviews with representative samples of the user and support groups, district administration and the VLOM community institutions as well as inspections of the water points.

The report concludes that a reliable and functional VLOM system capable of maintaining the operation of the water points is in place in the recipient communities.  The two main community institutions involved in the management of the water points are the Village Water and Health Committees (VWHC) and the Pump Committees (PC). Of the two, the PC’s which are directly involved in the water point operation and maintenance were the most active and therefore viewed as the more sustainable institution.

A number of threats to the projects’ sustainability were noted.  These included lack of support from the district administration, poor linkages and communication within and between community institutions and user groups; lack of regular contributions to the WPM; absence of locally produced fast running spare parts; and the possibility of major inflation in the cost of spares.  The project also experienced design changes and production faults in water pump parts that have had serious cost and operation implications for the management of the water points.  Women’s’ participation in VLOM was noted to have been generally increased by the 50% stipulation made by the project.  However, the level of participation in some communities was very low and there was evidence that women were being marginalised when it came to managerial and technical roles. 

The recommendations made for improving the effectiveness and efficiency of VLOM evolved from the identified problems and focus on the following major areas:

_          improved sustainability through improved financial management, training, technical support and improved linkages within and between community institutions and between community institutions and user groups and district administration;

_          increase in women’s’ participation in VLOM through community education and mobilization;

_          the establishment of a systematic health education system;

_          change in the VLOM sequence to ensure that users are involved from the beginning of project planning and implementation to develop a strong sense of ownership and responsibility for the project.  Especially vital is proper and participatory needs analysis.

 

 

Author(s):         Smet, J., et. al.

Title:     Evaluation of GWES programme, Uganda.  The water supply and environmental sanitation programme in the 1995-2000 GoU-UNICEF country programme  Evaluation Report Volumes 1 and 2.

Source: The Hague: IRC International Water and Sanitation Centre/Nairobi: NETWAS International/Kampala: NETWAS Uganda, 1998

Key words:      water, sanitation, programme evaluation, Uganda

Description:     

An interesting feature of this report is that it includes comments on the draft report by Ugandan WES stakeholders and a reaction/response to the comments by the Authors in one annex.  These comments provide insights to problem areas of the programme as well as to the evaluation itself.  This report is a valuable contribution to programme evaluation.

This extensive participatory evaluation was carried out to suggest improvements in the planning and implementation of the current WES programme in Uganda.  It was based upon analysis of the present programme and earlier experiences from the South-West Integrated Project (SWIP) and the Water and Sanitation Programme (WATSAN).  The programme covers 34 out of 45 districts in Uganda; the evaluation covered six districts selected on the bases of geo-hydrological, economic, social and cultural variations, and provided a good geographical spread.

Volume 1 is ten pages long and contains the executive summary and main recommendations.  Volume 2 is the main document, which contains an introduction, the methodology used, the findings and the annexes.

The evaluation was structured around general issues, institutional and process issues and sustainability of the facilities.  A framework covering these aspects and appropriate indicators for relevant levels is given in an annex, and stakeholders at different levels had a forum for contributing their views and ideas on the programme through this evaluation.

The Authors employed multiple qualitative (participatory) methods for different objectives.  They prepared and tested their methods and instruments prior to using them more broadly.  At the district level, they used SWOT analysis (analysis of Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities and Threats) of the WES programme as perceived by stakeholders.  They carried out institutional mapping, evaluating who the key actors are, and some of their roles and responsibilities.  They used other PRA techniques (mapping, FGD, sanitation ladder) for in-depth analysis to identify problems hindering performance and possible solutions.  To get at issues related to process and to highlight the differences between demand driven approach and demand responsiveness, they used role plays. 

An evaluation of the evaluation (process, methods and report) was carried out in an evaluation workshop.  Findings were rationalized in a “synthesis workshop”.

 

Authors:           Wasteneys, C., and Woodley, E.

Title:     Afforestation and social forestry in Northern Nigeria: a success story in desertification/land degradation control

Source:             Desertification Control Bulletin 32, 62-65 (United Nations Environment Programme), 1998

Key words:      agriculture, deforestation, desertification, Nigeria

Reviewer:         Clare Wasteneys, California

Description:     

An award-winning project for successful efforts in dryland management and desertification control.

The Authors report the findings of a 1997 evaluation of a reforestation project in Northern Nigeria. The purpose of the evaluation was to determine whether the project met the criteria for success for the Saving the Drylands Award, an award given in recognition of successful efforts in dryland management and desertification control.  The evaluation methodology followed a rapid rural appraisal approach, including four days visiting project sites and interviewing rural stakeholders, five days of interviews and meetings with project officers and government officials and five days for reviewing project documents.

The project had been undertaken in response to widespread land degradation.  This was attributed to rapid deforestation, due to a lack of effective policies and management practices in the forestry sector, excessive demand for agricultural land, fuelwood and poles, and overgrazing by livestock. The project used an integrated, multi-dimensional approach, including planting of shelter belts and woodlots, establishment of nurseries, forestry extension services, community mobilization, and special components focusing on youth and women.

The evaluators recommended the Project for the Saving the Drylands Award.  Benefits identified through the evaluation included soil conservation, improved soil fertility, increased crop yields, increased supplies of fuelwood, fodder and poles, generation of employment and income, increased awareness of the benefits of afforestation, and improved nutrition through fruit production.   Shortcomings include a lack of emphasis in the original project design on community participation and gender issues, although the project had increased efforts in these areas following a mid-term review.

The evaluators concluded that project achievements were sustainable, because project activities had continued without external funding for over one year and because there was a high level of awareness towards the deforestation problem among policy makers and the general population.  Other factors contributing to sustainability included the strong management capacity of project coordinating units and the commitment of project and community leadership.  Nevertheless, the evaluators had concerns about the availability of water for sustaining further reforestation efforts, including planting of shelterbelts, which was the main bio-physical intervention.

 

 

 
Hosted by www.Geocities.ws

1