| Public Access to Wetland Notices of
Intent |
|
eDEP: File Notices and Orders
Online
|
| NOI_File# | Filing
Date | Applicant's
First Name | Applicant's
Last Name | Location | Company | Region | Town | Comments� |
| 028-1830 | 7/21/2006 | | | Annisquam
Woods | Carrigan Enterprises Inc | NE | GLOUCESTER | Stormceptor unit isn't shown on plans.
Please provide Commission with the exact sized unit proposed to be installed.
Detention Basins should not be utilized for infiltration/recharge. The
Stormwater Guidance states that "infiltration and groundwater recharge is
negligible" for use in a detention basin. Applicant should look at
alternatives for recharge. The inlet located at Pond 2 should be located as
far away from the outlet as possible. It appears from the plans that the
area of BVW filling does not meet the definition of a finger like
projectection, but appears to be a narrow connection between adjacent BVWs.
Therefore this area of fill will need to be replicated. Applicant should
also know prior to construction whether they will be utlizing detention
basins or constructed pocket wetlands. Soil test pit information should be
included to ensure that there is a 2 foot separation to ground water under
each basin. Applicant should work to ensure that Watershed G meets
stormwater runoff standards. This standard must be met at each new discharge
point. Does project trigger any MEPA thresholds¿over 5 acres
impervious? |