USA TODAY: 08/13/98- Updated 12:24 PM ET The Nation's Homepage Try harder to hire U.S. tech workers By DeWayne Wickham The deal is signed and sealed, but not yet delivered. Republican leaders in the House and Senate reached an agreement late last month on the terms of a bill that will sharply increase the number of skilled foreigners who are allowed to work in this country. Under the deal, the annual limit for these workers - most of whom come from India and China - will rise from the current level of 65,000 new workers to 115,000 in three years. This 77% increase is intended to benefit high-tech computer firms that have lobbied Republican lawmakers for permission to import more and more foreign workers into the country. This is needed, the bill's supporters say, because the computer industry has 346,000 unfilled jobs for engineers, analysts and programmers - positions that the American workforce cannot fill. Opponents of the legislation, which is expected to be voted on in early September, say it will take jobs away from Americans and hold down salaries in the computer industry by bringing in large numbers of foreigners who are willing to work for less. Seek Americans first To address these concerns, Rep. Lamar Smith, the Texas Republican who chairs the House Judiciary Committee, won adoption of language that requires some companies that hire these foreign workers to certify that they first tried to fill the positions with Americans. This provision will not apply to large companies where the percentage of foreign workers - though maybe not the actual number - is a small part of the business workforce. This compromise doesn't go far enough. While computer industry advocates talk of a labor shortage, critics of the plan to expand the number of visas offered skilled foreigners argue that this is a manufactured crisis. To prove it, they point to this statistic: The unemployment rate for computer programmers over 50 years old is 17%. These are generally the most experienced and skilled programmers, who can command higher salaries than foreign workers. If that's right, the bill brokered by Republican congressional leaders will aid and abet a practice of age discrimination within an industry that is known to have flouted at least one other anti-discrimination law. Affirmative-action rules violated According to a report earlier this year in the San Francisco Chronicle, more than a dozen computer firms in California's Silicon Valley violated federal affirmative-action rules in the past seven years. In almost every case the offending company was cited by the Department of Labor for not making a "good faith effort" to hire Hispanic and black workers. It's hard to take seriously the computer industry's claim of a labor shortage necessitating the importation of tens of thousands of foreign workers when experienced, older Americans have such a high unemployment rate, and very little effort is made to recruit minorities. To remain the world's technological leader, this nation needs a computer industry whose workers are well educated and highly trained. But in achieving this, we cannot allow high-tech companies to engage in age and race discrimination. It's not enough to simply require computer firms to certify that they haven't bypassed qualified Americans to hire cheap labor from abroad. Tough financial and criminal penalties must be imposed on those companies that lie about making a serious effort to fill job vacancies with U.S. workers before turning to foreigners. Without a rock-solid guarantee to punish those businesses that lie about such an effort, the bill to increase the number of foreign workers allowed into this country each year should be defeated in Congress or vetoed by the president. Some Republicans see their support of this legislation as a chance to cut into the backing Democrats have been getting from the high-tech industry. They would be better served by building upon Smith's well-intended, but insufficient, efforts to protect the rights of U.S. workers. If America's high-tech industry put as much effort into employing older, experienced workers - and training young minorities - as it has in its drive to hire more foreigners, it would do itself and the nation a great service. DeWayne Wickham writes weekly for USA TODAY.