1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47

IMAGE imgs/section_3_pgmkr_601.gif
IMAGE imgs/section_3_pgmkr_602.gif IMAGE imgs/section_3_pgmkr_605.gif IMAGE imgs/section_3_pgmkr_606.gif

CORRELATIONAND

CAUSATION

Somecautionsmustbe notedat this point.

First, you cannot determinethe

causeof the relationshipfromthe correlationcoefficient.

Two variablesmay be

highly correlatedfor oneof threereasons:

(1)

X causesY,

(2)

Y causesX, or

(3)

both X and Y are causedby somethird variable.

Awell known storythat

illustratesthe danger of inferring causationfroma correlationcoefficient between

the numberof storksand the numberof births in Europeancities(that is, the

IMAGE imgs/section_3_pgmkr_6287.gif

morestorks,the morebirths).

Insteadof issuinga dramatic announcement

supportingthe mythical powersof storks,further investigationwas carried out.

It

was found that storksnestin chimneys,which in turn led to the conclusionthat a

third variable was responsiblefor the relationshipbetweenstorksand births -

sizeof city.

Large citieshad morepeople,and hencemorebirths; and more

houses,and hencemorechimneys,and hencemorestorks.

Thus, attribution

causality is a logical or scientific problem,not a statisticalone.

IMAGE imgs/section_3_pgmkr_604.gif

Hosted by www.Geocities.ws

1