The Dance of Death

(The Colliseum Society)

The deathcult of celebrity

& how to eradicate it

By Adam G. Ghaznavi

`I have been everything,

& everything is nothing.'

- Marcus Aurelius

1 An Ancient Struggle

The first 2 Volumes of S.O.F. illustrate that:

Human consciousness is a battlefield between:

........the eternal truth all know (humanity has always known).... that (the) pol/econ system based on social stratification ultimately breaks down completely somewhere along the line, threatening wholesale anarchy..... even if you do (they did) not know where....

....this is the primordial basis for all altruism, the instinctive recognition that social stratification is ultimately unviable, & a system based on equality is ultimately imperative to enable order....

Of course, as we have seen, equality as an end in itself leads to destructive consumption of the social surplus product for subsistence (treat capital as income), leads to economic anarchy, is unviable - equality as a means to an end however is imperative; to enable the whole citizenry to educate themselves to the degree neccessary to meet the common threats/ objectives that confront/ threaten human existence

- (&) only such a culture of the common threat to human existence can stabilise the WARTIME sacrifices (from the core states to finance global reconstruction neccessary to enable this) insuring social stability between peoples.

The primordial elemental understanding that class society ultimately cannot be sustained indefinitely (even if/ when they did not know how) is/ was the immortal rational/ self interested basis of ALL altruism, seeking peace of mind... even when previously because class society was able to progress, reform itself in response to radical shocks, humanity was not threatened with all out oblivion & (correspondingly) it was not possible to scare them shitless with the threat of military plutocratic oblivion to get them to endure WARTIME sacrifices for global reconstruction. (leading such to drift by tragic default, into reactionary egalitarianism, the destructive consumption of the surplus product for subsistence - treat capital as income).

and.....

The desire to remain slaves.... to not take responsibility for the tasks of reconstruction.... to sell one's soul to priest, king or party boss in exchange for peace/ order (so as not to have to think/ confront responsibility for this Q).

(As we have seen throughout S.O.F.) For as long as the machine of war/ finance/ class society was able to develop/ reform itself in response to radical shock, it was possible for these tendancies to co-exist in (mutually interdependant) shifting, unstable, equillibrium.

BUT

The rise of global finance beyond the control of any state (undermining the capacity of the state to act as arbiter between capital & labor/ instigate rev reform/ reconfiguration of the geo pol/econ in response to a radical shock) changes all this.

There is no longer co-existence... there is no more opportunity to maintain a pretence about fighting for freedom whilst conforming to enemy operational control of the military political agenda. What was once said only by those that called themselves revolutionaries, that democracy is a sham, that the political frontmen are all rentboys for the financiers, is now accepted by the vast majority even of non radical citizenry....

...there is nowhere to run, no alternative to the enslaving commercial deathcult (of celebrity)... disarming/ debasing your soul, so as to leave you defenceless before the terrifying apocalyptic threats triggered by the global econ implosion/ collapse into warlordist anarchy....

.....except the most extreme bid for freedom, to embrace redemption through sacrifice, WARTIME sacrifices in both blood & treasure, to overthrow the enemy.... & finance global reconstruction....

....for either ALL shall be free, or none shall be free.....

2 The Death Cult of Celebrity
& How to Eradicate it

Supply Side

The pol/econ machine of war/ finance organically retains control of the media agenda as.....

Capital centred media corps needs information/images not for its own sake - but for profit (individual accummalation).

Wheras revolution/ revolutionary civil society markets ideas/ info for its own sake - basis of knowledge (not capital centred) accummalation - leading to (militarised) social accumalation.

How does the fear of alienating capital impact?

Well, as such corps not based on a unifying civil society dialectic (which was not even possible until the potential for development based on social differentiation exhausted), these corps were simply too weak (in terms of pol/econ gravity) to defy capital. Therefore, to survive, they had to succumb to its will/hegemony of matter over consciousness (save for micro niche markets).

The enemy, fragments stories and (therefore) routinely decontextualises to trigger visual/emotional stimuli (nazis unified these distorted fragments in the Great German idea - as we have seen. Though contempory finance capital has no need/use for such a unification of disperate fragments).

Hence the atomisation into smaller and smaller soundbites (as working within the regime there are no big ideas anymore or more properly, no more illusions of such - such as laborism sought to foster) and classical laborisms' pathetic attempt to work within this construct and finally outright capitulation all along the line to the enemy agenda.

This is both an expression of and catalyst for, labors' marginalisation.

The hegemony of finance over civil society (of matter over consciousness) is essentially a mob culture. An appeal to vulgar emotional stimuli/ inchoate rage - as evinced in the mob proxy press & negotiated lynchings of daytime TV - the construct of which is designed to/ lends itself to the hyping of outraged emotion - which feeds into the contempory phenonemon of the Daytime Dictator, the cynical refashioning of PR/ policy to appeal to (or at least appease) such sentiment, in order to justify (& facilitate the) repression of dissent.

(Finance centred) TV acts as the gauleiter - proxy, but then it always aspired to such a function. What is different now is that there are no laborist institutional bulwarks to mitigate its impact. So, its' march with laborism smashed is relentless.

Ultimately (even leaving aside the global econ collapse) its tendancy to transcend the nation state (the buying up of the airwaves/ compulsion to accept whatever filth they pour out/ of course combined with respect of their commercial imperium) completely leads to its own utter destruction.

Eg the growing unregulated (either by the state or by civil society) popularity of extreme fighting, which sells itself on the threat of death in the ring, which fuels a jaded degenerate market for snuff matches... leads to the breakdown of all moral order... when the only purpose of the state is to oversee the `rules' of this `sport', no fragment of law remains, save that imposed by crushing, through general massacre, such a `culture', at the level of both `fan' & media moghul, to establish order.

The Revolution however, presents everything as a single story (in a single action agenda, movement - The Harmony of Pen & Sword examined in Vol I C1). This shall be the basis of our military political eclipse of Murdoch and co.

The Dance of Death

A further manifestation of this moral capitulation is a (contemporary) faith/junkie like craving for leaders/illusions - to BELIEVE - in a leader, solution, way of being, without the most extreme danger; without consciously taking destiny in our own hands, in a totalised defiance of all established convention/struggle patterns.

This includes everything from the most crude extreme marginal manifestations of intellectualised stupidity (eg Holocaust denial) - to respectable faith in orthodox politics - that this is a democracy; indeed encompassing the most refined esoteric manifestations of such banality, such complexity, studious/sophisticated avoidance of reality - it takes brains to be that stupid. All the way to marginal efforts to `overthrow' the regime by working within its laws & operational agenda.

The desolate emptiness, frankly cowardliness of this (as at 15/5/01 all pervasive) dialectic, leads to a (now) perpetual tearing down of idols they allow to be set up by tabloids/media for them to worship (by same) - responding as Murdoch so rightly says to popular demand (to which we shall return).

This leads to `The Dance of Death' - The mutual destruction of leaders/ celebrity and the people - on the basis of an inertial propping up of the continuing but rapidly decomposing hegemony of matter over consciousness.

Vampire Slaying

We have seen that (like a vampire), the military plutocratic regime renews itself culturally through the deathcult of celebrity, the transference (by a complicit public) of moral authority (that is rightly the prerogative of the thinking mind/ civil society), projected onto cult figures/ process of idol creation... which become cultural shamens, defining moral law through degenerate cults of cool.... creating a religous pressure to conform to them unthinkingly (the sacrifices to such manifest through the purchase of shit they don't even want to avoid social sanctions for sinning against fashion/ convention)...

Such is purchased not only with money, but with one's soul. Knowledge & its useful deployment is desecrated by this cult; for one's soul/ ability to learn becomes the slave of this religion, matter doesn't serve humanity in its struggle to face down the common threats/ objectives that confront humanity's survival, humanity murders its own soul & ultimately itself in the service of matter, in the service of idols it has raised up for itself in its desperate attempt to avoid being confronted with what it knows at the core of its being,

that all shall be free or none shall be free, & that the price in blood & treasure must be confronted head on if humanity is not to perish outright....

`Look here here you sanctimonious bastard, you know perfectly well that we have to buy into such marketed crap, for we have to buy the latest shitty shit for our kids, so they don't get picked on in school. You're smart enough to know this....'

Okay, then get of your knees and fight.

As well as the rev pol campaign outlined in `Intro to Qm' & S.O.F., it is neccessary also to smash the enemy's cultural points of support; most especially in youth culture/ music (including pseudo revolutionary) through which the regime renews itself, via the vampire cult of celebrity, draining the lifeblood of humanity's souls into vicious, barbaric (commercial) cults of cool (where people are judged unthinkingly not by what they know but by what peice of pointless merchandise they don't even want, they possess) etc....

The most effective way to do this is via info piracy (operationally linked into the campaign for the common ownership of info analysed in `Intro to QM' & S.O.F. Vol I Chapter 1), systematically denying the enemy the capacity to (commercially) repair/ re-establish its cultural points of support (via celebrity centred music) over people's minds.....

(eg the bankrupting of corporate music, means that musicians cease functioning as corporate prostitutes, renewing corp culture; but, as this thence is no longer an option for them, HAVE to resort to concerning themselves with the wider pol/econ situation.... as the fate of humanity, becomes manifestly their own fate - the loss of royalties blitzing their ivory towers of showbiz stupidity.

- note also that the music corps have been at the forefront of calling for policing of the internet by the state hirlings of global finance, in their interest, making it even more imperative to smash them utterly, for they are the strategic cultural vanguard of the info barons -

....those that wish to reduce humanity to info serfs, by privitising the airwaves, by eliminating free info on the internet, by privitising the human genetic code, by reducing farmers to utter serfs through the use of the terminator seed)

In this civil war fought out principally in people's minds, info piracy serves a purpose analgous to aerial bombardment in WWII which destroyed the industrial capacity to repair warfighting potential (- which in the geo pol/econ context of the time analysed in Chapter 2 Vol II of S.O.F. enabled a successful invasion to take place), just as info piracy (especially combind with struggle for the common ownership of information) destroys the (military plutocratic machine's) enemy's capacity to repair/ re-establish its cultural points of support over people's minds .

Furthermore it slays the poisonous myth of `radical celebrity'.

Watch as the `militants' scuttle to their lawyers to (try to) enforce their copyright! Jeer in unison as gangster rappers and other corporate lowlife insist that their royalties deserve `respect', more so than low paid parents fretting over their kids trying to survive in the dark barbaric (commodity as opposed to knowledge) culture these celebrities have helped fuel.

Censorship of such is no answer. Bombard these scum where it is most effective. In their corporate solar plexis. Around this both extreme revolutionaries and the better elements of old fashioned conservatives can unite. For the slash & burn morality of celebrity owes no loyalty to any morality, to any law other than its' own desire for plunder. There is no level to which it will not descend, back to the gladiatorial arena as/ when needs must (note the craze for `extreme fighting' & where it leads next - which must be eradicated).

So all who despise it, who would see civil society freed from such self inflicted bondage must stand together. For the common ownership of Info, so that a conscious civil society, united by the common threats/ objectives that confront its survival, is able to bridle finance to serve civil society instead of (war &) finance threatening apocalyptic anarchy/ oblivion as a result of finance (continuing to) reign as a law unto itself .

3 Rebellion of the Damned

The Queen of Madness

The most striking manifestation of popular stupidity is the recent Diana phenonemon.

This phenonemon (as we shall see) represented an attempt to reconcile the struggle to be free & to be unfree, through the cult of Diana......

Monarchy and celebrity in general needed to justify itself in the context of the cold war. Therefore competing in the propaganda battle, in the marketing of an illusion....

(As seen this propaganda battle was more organic than orchestrated, eg in continuously adapting to the need to respond to keep people's attention, by stimulating them at an animalistic emotional level rather than risk losing their attention - which if reaching a chronic degree, as with leaden footed, unresponsive centralised propaganda machines in E.Bloc, would generate the threat of them thinking about those ruling over them).

.....with (duel dialectic of) increasing expansion of consumerism (itself the product of geo pol/econ rev reforms post WWII & later speculative credit expansion), as well as increasing economic instability/ breakdown (specifically of the old radical community currents, eclipsed by rise of global finance), there consequantly developed a market in less deferential stories (commercially impelled by advertising led media).

A manifestation of plebian discontent, masked as `sincere attachment to the throne' . The masses increasingly/continuously wished to pull down the media celebrities they hyped, breaking their own idols.

Internal discontent in the House of Windsor vis Diana (against Charles/Queen et al) led to her leaning on the people against the apex. (A part of the establishment, yet a victim of this same establishment - nevertheless a part of it).

This catalysed popular identification with Diana, against the apex. A feeling that both `us and her' had been mistreated by this same cold cruel system.

Her death catalysed a massive explosion. People attempting to use Diana against the monarchy, which they increasingly wished (sought a pretext) to break from.

Yet afraid to do so openly.

Hence her funeral was effectively a revolutionary demonstration of discontent - under the Royal Coats of Arms.

Yet this leads nowhere. Could only lead nowhere. A dialectical absurdity in a world where there are no more classical left wing leaders/parties (for no more room for such within this decomposing global pol/econ).

The masses sought (subliminally) to use Diana as a vehicle for change (to break from the system - they hated yet were afraid to say so openly - hence this identification). Yet the reason they latched onto her (felt safe in doing so) was because she was within the system (therefore not a direct clash of legitimacies - with all its attendant dangers). For this same reason, bugger all could ever have come from it (for us or for her).

Eg a `down to earth monarchy - just like you or I' (which she represented) after initial euphoria, must thence justify its position. It was only the fact that she was in opposition to the apex, eg not the apex itself, that enabled her to become a focus for such.

The phoniness of the hope in Diana, the anger and the impotence at her funeral, represented a people in requiem for itself.

Princess Diana:

Still a woman of blood

I intend the following as a vaccine against any info that may come out at a later date concerning the possible assassination of Princess Diana. I fear the consequant storm of stupidity that would grip the public consciousness more than anything else, so am writing this to arm cadres with the antidote to counter the madness that would grip the citizenry.

Much has been written about wether or not Princess Diana was assassinated. It is neccessary to confront this Q here in order to illustrate why, that even if she was, no revolutionary worth the name should attempt to make cheap capital out of it, but should instead bear in mind that...

...(she was herself responsible entirely for underpinning the institution of crown power which she never broke from or renounced, so thence buttressed its legitimacy in order that her son could occuppy the position later.... behind which every power criminal takes refuge, every crime is committed even those she may have attempted to position herself against, had she lived)...

....she (therefore) possesses a shared guilt with the people, ......

Unlike previous assassinations, there is no mountain of evidence, no tangle of loose threads to prove that she was assassinated. It could be pure coincidence. Motive DOES NOT by itself prove guilt. Though others may have proof. & the impact of its revelation would be terrible.

This compels me to confront this Q in order to present WHY revolutionary cadres/ citizenry should NOT make an issue of her (possible) assassination & should politically fight ALL those that try to.

If, If, If she WAS assassinated, it would have been over the nuclear Q. Not landmines (vis the campaign against, she was part of) or the Muslim Arab royal sibling that might have resulted.

The fear would have been, that as someone who couldn't live outside of the camera lens, that needed adulation, that if she had succeeded in getting a PAPER committment from the UN to do away with landmines, completely regardless of wether or not anything was done about it, she would have been attacked by the establishment AND by sizeable elements of the liberal left, that would have said `Well, WHAT about the nuclear Q? You wouldn't dare touch THAT one.'

And having burned her bridges with sections of the establishment, & being goaded & egged on (by more friendly elements &) needing to secure in her own mind some kind of sense of purpose, even developing a psychological momentum, if she even ONCE so much as mentioned the nuclear Q, the secureaucracy could NEVER get rid of her, because it would be too blindingly obvious WHY they assassinated her. So she had to be assassinated BEFORE she mentioned this Q, in order that a trawlerful of red herrings could be deployed....

....for there are some very significant figures that have made anti nuclear statements. Generals Lord Carver (Britain) MacNamara (USA) & Lebed (Russia) have all gone on record as saying nukes serve no useful purpose.... Such a (potential) moral cavalry charge would certainly not have completely destroyed the military industrial complex, but left it politically shaken.... its legitimacy heavily questioned.... (& you can do without that kind of thing if you want all your long term star wars options to at least remain open.... as the true rulers of the USA & British dogsbodies always ever did...)

This would on the face of it make her a heroic martyr to the cause of humanity. And it is this extremely dangerous error that we must put right......

For Diana died not for our sins, nor for a noble cause but BECAUSE OF A SHARED UNREDEEMED CRIME SHE HAD COMMITTED WITH THE PEOPLE, A REFUSAL (ON HER PART) TO USE HER POSITION TO ABOLISH CROWN POWER, A REFUSAL (ON BOTH HERS/ & THE PEOPLES') TO FACE UP TO THE NEED FOR WARTIME SACRIFICES (MILITARY & ECONOMIC) FOR GLOBAL REV RECONSTRUCTION.

She could have said:

`I renounce the crown & all titles. I renounce all such for my children, that the people be obliged to take both power & responsibility for their own destiny & not cower behind royalty/ celebrity.... using their prostration before such as a cowardly excuse to avoid seizing/ confronting their destiny & the moral obligations (& sacrifices they must make) therein....'

She chose NOT to break from the crown.... she chose to keep her son on course to become king. She chose to remain a prop of all the crimes that are committed in the name of the crown, even as she positioned herself against some of the crimes themselves. By (consequantly) actively obstructing civil society (by underpinning crown power) she obstructed the resolution of said power crimes.

She remained thence (morally, if not due to divorce, legally), a woman of blood, as Charles Windsor is (BOTH morally & legally, by rev law), irredeemably, a man of blood.

& because she died NOT as a rev martyr, but as a woman of blood, her death is NOT a legitimate concern for revolutionaries; as pre-occupation with such is a means of avoiding the crime the people (previously) committed in concert with her, namely ignoring the need for wartime (military &) econ sacrifices for global rev reconstruction....

.....which is why they tolerated her specific crime of clinging to/ legitimating crown power....

To those that say `....isn't this mean/ harsh?'

History is mean & harsh.

History will be meaner & harsher to bands of pseudo revolutionary fools that make her name their banner, rather than face the bitter reality of what freedom costs in blood & treasure.

Absolutely no pity, no concession must be shown to their moral cowardice. So we are forced to judge Princess Diana not as a tragic individual caught up by issues she hadn't the wit to deal with, but as a historic figure. & the pitiless judgement must remain. Woman of blood.

For revolutionaries their duty is clear, it is to force everyone to confront the Qs raised by the core vectors of propagation outlined in `Intro to Quantum Materialism' (eg Ulster Q & `neutralising doomsday' etc), what it will cost in blood & treasure to resolve them...,

Agents of Madness?

It cannot be ruled that (in event of enemy losing control of pol/econ agenda due to global econ crash or even in extreme case, if the launch of this theory is especially successful before then, that) deep agents, apparently defectors from the secret state, that have built up a sense of trust among dissident circles, may spring a particularly nasty trap, in revealing proof that Diana was murdered. A single card, that will unleash an onslaught of mass stupidity far more ferocious & widespread than when Diana died.

Millions of people, gripped by a savage cowardly sentimentality, that wouldn't dream of considering seriously what it will cost in blood & treasure to build the revolution, will imagine themselves "revolutionaries".... screaming for the heads of the regime and its replacement with..... they know not what!

HOW on earth should we respond to this madness?

For a start it is highly likely that this would be launched as a bold psycological operations move, presumably in the context of widespread econ chaos.... (it is concievable that the expansion of the rev theory prior to the global econ implosion could also trigger such a move)... designed to get elements hostile to the state to act in a way that the regime is better able to manage. & "revolutionaries" rioting for Diana, lacking anything like a viable military pol/econ program capable of seizing & consolidating power (the example of which creats mass demorailisation, a feeling of worthlessness, that they can never determine their own future), is certainly more manageable for the enemy than the type of military political movement we will be putting together (though of course given the general collapse into warlordism post econ crash, the enemy are powerless to save themselves from themselves)....

Simply by warning cadres in advance, we arm them with the means to prepare to/ deal with this threat (& hold their nerve)... For revolutionaries, nothing of substance will change, just the superficial appearances. We will still be preparing for/ & confronted by the Ulster Q etc, we will still be pushing sacrifices for global reconstruction. It will remain the job of revolutionaries to confront the world with these brutal facts.

It is simply therefore a matter of holding the thin red line until the shower has exhausted itself.

The Bottomless Pit

...Dianaism is the perfect vehicle for the truly demented...., because it appeals to all those that want to be spared the agony of facing what it will cost in blood & treasure to depose/ consolidate the overthrow of the military plutocracy, even more the pain of thinking for itself (merely emoting) it has a latent popular base that is hard to overestimate.

A typical business model that would benefit dramatically from linkage with (resurgent) Dianaism is:

David Icke:
The venus fly trap model

of anti- semitism

David Icke is a phenonemon it is extremely tempting (especially for the author) to ignore completely. I do not normally concern myself with the pronouncements of persons that claim the world is in the grip (not merely of a machine beast of war & finance, but) of an empire `....of 12 foot (human) blood drinking lizards.....' But as I shall illustrate, his particular brand of anti logic is potentially more dangerous than it at first appears.

The danger is rooted in the enemy to be feared above all others. Stupidity.

It is not just the decomposition of the orthodox left that... enables such to arise... it is that the only effective model of resistance (outlined in S.O.F.) now available is so extreme so perilous that it brooks nothing less than total commitmant.

There is a vast political market waiting to be tapped that wants the allure of being dangerous & revolutionary WITHOUT the real danger... that allows people to decry their rulers, to emote, without facing the costly imperative of their removal from power in blood & treasure....

...Icke's political business model gives his audience the taste (albeit in phoney form) of all out war/ fight to the finish... indeed it his loony tune that indirectly imparts this heady flavor of no surrender no compromise (how could one, with 12 foot lizards... 11 foot 6 maybe....) so feels free from the all pervasive necrosis of utter defeat that infects every aspect of conventional leftist thinking & psychology.... this makes them feel alive.... (implacability without the stress of real thought & risk/ cost, but with the thrill of such imagined, makes this doubly attractive).

Indeed when he is attacked by establishment figures as well as the conventional left (who have long since sold their souls to the police), for being a coded antisemite, he actually ends up looking significantly better than before they tried to destroy him....

The danger is that this DOES make an excellent model for anti semitism.

It is not directly (or even necesarily at all) tainted with WWII genocidal supremacist ideology. But, precisely because the wacko component (12 foot lizards) is even more obviously barking than the `Protocols of the elders of zion', it makes the perfect venus fly trap model of anti semitism....

Eg to waste time shooting this fuckwit would be politically self destructive for any rev antifascist. He has no political illegitimacy (that classical fascist trappings bring), despite his rape of logic.....

But, when/ if his movement gets to a certain size (as could certainly be the case if the Diana factor came back into play), he can (or someone else can, with his base) substitute the 12 foot lizard line with Jew (& or the like), & far from meeting resistance within his movement of wilfully self deluded pseudo dissidents, assuming his movement is large enough, this would even be greeted with a sense of relief/ knowing pride that they had outflanked `the Jews' that would otherwise have got them the shite blasted out of them had they revealed their hand earlier.....

It is inconcievable that there would be crippling mutinies within the ranks, saying `I buy the idea of 12 foot lizards ruling the world, but this stuff about the Jews is pure bunk'... For the (mutually supportive) sense of cowardly wilful self delusional affront that leads them to join such a movement, would more than adequately underpin such a turn. It is of course, all a matter of timing.

Any Jews complacently thinking that oil loving, Armageddon USA has a special fondness for them, would do well (in context of USA gone mad with econ crisis, looking to bring forward the 2nd coming through nuclear Armageddon) to read the Book of Revelations 7:4.... denoting that only 144,000 (out of 25 million) Jews are to survive... Resurgent antisemitism is perfectly consistent with/ running alongside an initial apocalyptic alliance..... indeed the whole point about such an epoch is that the strains of madness are often mutually conflicting but no less fatal to ALL human existence for it.

EVERYTHING depends on a cadre prepared in advance & able to hold the line against the madness.

Machine Against Machine:
Against the Silver Bullet Mentality

`Okay, okay. WHAT about Bohemian Grove (California), where apparently, it is admitted that a sizeable tranche of elite world figures gather to worship a giant owl in a manner a cross between a USA college fraternity ritual & something out of a Dennis Wheatley novel?'

(the ceremonial torching of `care' in effigy, symbolising humanistic morality/ concerns - the symbolic `freeing' of the assembled from such concerns)

WHAT IF the allegations of ritual child sacrifice (to this diabolic mentality) turn out to be true? WHAT IF there are extensive networks of organisations similar to the notorious `Hellfire Club' of early 19th century England (which had many govt/ aristocratic figures to its name - among other cults of note, the vile aristocratic Thule society, commendably massacred outright by German Communists in 1920; and an international pre WWI cult organised by Adolf Lanz, including Lord Kitchener and calling for war to `cull the lower orders')? WHAT IF the Marc Dutroux scandal in Belgium, plethora of child sex (in children's homes) cover ups in Britain & countless others, form a hideous pattern of semi generalised elite power pathology?

HOW would this THEN affect your approach?'

Structurally, it would have at the extreme, at most, a peripheral effect, & absolutely NOT effect the main angles of attack.

Again, people like such scandals because they can then indulge themselves in the pursuit of (apparently) easy solutions. The SILVER BULLET mentality. Just indict this scumbag, or hundred or ten thousand/ more...

NO need to ask ourselves about econ priorities, about sacrifices for global reconstruction, we can feel like heroes AND evade our responsibilities...

This represents everything that is wrong with USA radicalism.

What we had/ will(?) have in Britain (vis Diana phenonemon) is a transference of hope. What we have in the USA is a transference of blame. The common factor is an evasion of what freedom will really cost not just in blood but also in treasure. & in the USA this has been the single arch cause of every peice of hairbrained stupidity the militias (who to be fair have much to commend them, their instinctive hostility to the enemy disarming the citizenry) ever committed. This is why they fell into the trap laid for them by the regime with the Waco atrocity, why they did the enemy's job for it.... so that Oklahoma bombing (likely to be a classic strategy of tension operation...) actually fitted their own propaganda.

....why consequantly too many of the better elements have been hammered (as a result of the militias falling into this trap)...

The key thing is to stick to a machine orientated approach. These gilded slaves serve the military plutocracy, the machine of war/ finance which reigns as a law unto itself. For this they must hang. The key thing is to indict/ defeat the machine. To do this it is neccessary to deploy another military political economic constitutional machine capable of removing the enemy & consolidating global political economic order. THIS means sacrifices in blood & TREASURE for global reconstruction.

ANYTHING which ALLOWS people to ignore this, is the enemy of the Revolution. For the beast, both christ & antichrist lies within all of us, & if we run away from the truth, of what it will cost to consolidate order, then within us, each other, the beast shall arise again & again however many times we hack of its head.

We must slay both the enemy without AND the enemy within our souls, or servitude to the machine of finance reigning as a law unto itself shall devour not only our souls but the whole world with it.

With this in mind, only the POWER crime (of the elite) justifies armed revolution (which signifies not only the enemy's overthrow but also humanity's seizure of responsibility for determining its own destiny).

The proven rape/ even sacrifice of children (by the elite), does not constitute treasonous power crime warranting full scale civil war. Though the criminal system of power they accumalated which enabled them to foster such an arrogant mentality (that may or may not have led to such crimes) obviously does. This is not hairsplitting, but a CAPITAL distinction on which hinges the fate of the Revolution.

I don't intend, amidst extreme unpopularity of WARTIME sacrifices for global reconstruction, to unneccessarily provoke the patience of the citizenry by indicting the enemy for satanic cults, but instead shall deal with the IRREFFUTABLE MACHINE CRIMES in the indictment below:

Indictment

We charge the USA led core military plutocracy & their European/ global confederates, with being enemies of all humanity.

That they function as a military economic machine to violently oppose the establishment of civil society control over finance (& the establishment of a redistributive European commonwealth & global commonwealth confederation) to compel finance to serve humanity, but instead preserve finance as a law unto itself

That in order to underpin the rule of this machine (as a law unto itself), they have prostituted all law to serve the interests of said machine, engaging furthermore in global intimidation/ terrorism the aiding & abetting of tyranny against global civil society in order to enforce its interests.

That they aided & abetted the expansion of the mercenary arms trade/ military industrial complex (including nuclear plutocracy) threatening the very existence of humanity, because to seek mutual security (through the breaking of ALL national security state tyrannies'/ their scope for expansion, including the former USSR) through the construction of a global commonwealth confederation, could only be attained through the breaking of their military plutocratic imperium.

That as an integral part of their military plutocratic tyranny, they held the world to ransom through the stockpiling of weapons of mass destruction, that the very construction & retention of same, constitutes a manifest decleration of intent to use them when the interests of the criminal machine be fundamentally threatened.

That through the wasteful speculation of the military plutocracy (as a result of finance being a law unto itself) & the consequant impoverishment of whole continents - especially Russia, we are now choking on our own barbed wire as a result of their criminality, & are threatened with the spectre of warlordist revanchism (when Russia breaks up leading to massive westward migration, fascist terror against migrants in western Europe & warlordist revanchism a la Genghis Khan).

We recognise that the 1st step to salvation is our acknowledgement of & atonement for out moral guilt in tolerating these criminals by proclaiming our recognition that we must either endure WARTIME sacrifices for global reconstruction or choke to death on our own barbed wire.

We call for the popular impeachment of the military plutocratic machine &, when the citizenry/ army won over, its overthrow by armed revolution; to bring the criminal machine's cohorts to trial & establish the European Socialist Commonwealth (of the regions of Europe - the nation state being too small to prevent finance being a law unto itself, being good only for military plutocratic chaos & war)/ Global Commonwealth Confederation, & a true state of law.

In arms we proclaim our recognition, that none shall be free, unless ALL are set free.

We assert the right of revolutionary antifascists to engage in armed defensive & OFFENSIVE actions against classical fascists; & we assert this as a direct challenge to the legitimacy of the military plutocratic regime.

......To squander the authority of the martyrs sacrifices (& with it the Revolution & with that order & all human existence) by indulging in peripheral issues (such as elite satanic cults) is a graver crime against humanity than the existence of such cults.

A MACHINE based indictment/ approach is the only way to seal of ALL escape roots for the beast within & without....

Ultra Fascism

Q. Are you seriously suggesting that such cults then are to be ignored? & if not, under what conditions do you suggest that they constitute legitimate military targets for the Revolution?

It is neccessary to understand the historical context & (consequant) psycho political pathology of such cults in order to know how to deal with them.

The primary targets are as (already) outlined... the military plutocratic machine (of war/ finance)... & people's complacency....

These cults & elite secret societies (owl worshippers/ Bilderberg Group) are only a secondary outgrowth, they are both symptomatic & secondarily symbiotic with the evolution of military plutocracy itself, its latent capacity for development/ reconfiguration of war/ finance nexus (as a hegemonic machine ruling as a law unto itself),... they depend absolutely on the complicity of the people themselves.....

WHEN this (potential for development) is finally exhausted with the great econ crash, you will get a tendancy becoming generalised to ultra fascism (affecting all layers of society, especially old/ new warlordist class) overt cults of evil worship.....

....note how half of all Americans believe in `christ's second coming being triggered by nuclear war' (an illusion that will seem desperately attractive to extremely unpopular politicians, to embrace/ take refuge in such a Jim Jones type venture in order to hide from themselves the truth about .....), the supreme manifestation of the pervasive belief that humanity cannot be master of its own destiny, the tendancy to surrender to faith in a benign deity, in an instant, tipping over into surrender to faith in a malign deity, to appease such an idol, to try to regain some illusion of control over their fate, propelling everything into an unspeakable abyss, as cults compete to appease the nightmare of their own fear of confronting seizing their own destiny.... no horror no crime will be too much, be enough, to appease the demonic insanity of a world gone completely mad....

........especially as (amidst such spiralling chaos) humanity be the only abundant food available....

......cults of terror in which murder especially cannibalistic & mass murder (including through weapons of mass destruction) becomes the primary focus of human endeavour..... this is not the product of the `New World Order', this would grow naturally out of the warlordist chaos...

The Q remains, WHEN are such cults a legitimate military target?

The Thule society was a legitimate target for general massacre because of its operational connexions with the Nazis.....

The only way that this USA deathcult (& others like it) will become a legitimate military target is when it becomes overtly linked to a classical fascist movement...

...specifically in the context of the USA, when Caesarism arises & the civil war be fought out over the common ownership of info, any military political movment opposing it to be crushed...

This doesn't mean they have to engage in demented diabolic practices, it doesn't mean they don't.

The point is to stick to the strategic core issues, & NOT to disappear up one's own arsehole countering mumbo jumbo with jumbo mumbo.

OTHER targets for general massacre include (when revolution is preparing to take power) extreme/ gladiatorial fighting and (as of routine) ultra fascist satanic groups engaging in classical fascist activities.

At all times the key issues are finance reigning as a law unto itself, the common ownership of info as the precondition to enable civil society to place finance under civil society hegemony, & the need for civil society to face up the need for WARTIME econ sacrifices for global reconstruction.... these cauterise the threats from all ultra fascist tendancies most especially the elite form, as it cuts their power lines.

ALL the power such a cult has is wholly derivative of the power of the 2 main factors, the unaccountable power of the military plutocratic machine & popular complacency, cut these 2 points of & the whole thing withers....

Conclusion

Hitherto reason & unreason, murder & the struggle for freedom had been shot through together.... for example as seen Britain's relative freedom/ room for dialogue on basis of capitalist hegemony, was dependant on slavery, the empire & a geo pol/econ division of labor between core states & the colonial periphery.

Now with rise of global finance beyond control of any one state making radical reform/ reconfiguration of the core pol/econ in response to a radical shock impossible, it is clear that none shall be free unless all are set free. This means facing wartime sacrifices for global reconstruction to prevent the core states choking on their own barbed wire. Attempts to evade this Q, by clinging to.... will only lead to the kind of collective madness outlined above...

But these same threats of oblivion mean that the ancient civil war raging in all humanity's soul can be won at last. For now that there is nowhere to run, to hide, no priest, king or party boss that can gaurentee order; the political army can arise to save humanity, by confronting it with the bitter price in blood & treasure that must be paid, to face down the apocalyptic threats of military plutocratic oblivion/ finance global reconstruction, neccessary to gaurentee order.

Q If I EXPRESSLY cannot know that Diana was assassinated WHY am I being so mischevious in raising the possibility?

Because I absolutely do not trust the people. I do not trust them to retain composure if it is proven she was, I fear the madness they would descend into, & so I want there to be a thin red line that will hold its nerve.... ....& be able to move forward.

As for the majority of people, only political education fused with bitterest experiance will learn them anything of substance.

Q. But am I not fuelling this process, apparently turning the Diana Q into a vector of propagation?

No. For insofaras this may happen, it is self negating, eg to cancel out the drive to exploit it in same way as we would vectors Ulster/ neutralising doomsday etc. BECAUSE Its EFFECTIVE purpose is to innoculate the movement against such madness & nothing more.

It is anticipated that the curiousity that fuels interest in this Q here would push deeper reading/ absorption of this self negating mechanbism (& corresponding intense mistrust of those that don't)

The key point to bear in mind is that unlike other Qs (eg Ulster Q & other vectors of propagation outlined in `Intro to QM'), the furore over the Diana Q does not encourage people to think about our ideas, for the popularity of this factor is due to it being a (desperate) way to avoid the trouble of thinking, which though will exhaust itself. It is merely a matter of riding out the storms of stupidity until they do so.

4 The Ghost of Cromwell?

`This is a powerful form of celebrity you are creating, this cult of anti celebrity.... & what is to stop you (or one after) reigning this Commonwealth as Lord Protector, King or Caesar?'

Splitting the idea from the personality

The problem we must confront is how to split the idea from the personality (me) that uncovered it. As we have seen....., this can effectively be achieved through martyrdom. The essence of which is to in a single action both take and (in fact in order to) simaltaneously relinquish/devolve to the mass of activists absolute power. The masses thence permanently keep their leaders in check via the moral dictatorship of martyrs (the threat of a new revolution if they overstep the clearly defined boundaries of rev constitutional authority - this is the unwritten part of the revolutionary constitution).

But we are forced to confront the Q, if only as a theoretical exercise, to illustrate the checks & balances of the revolution; what happens if something goes wrong with the plan & by some extremely unlikely sequance of events, with a rapid series of successes (beginning with the enemys' hand being forced into releasing me vis my hunger strike/mass demos etc etc - though the overwhelming liklihood is that the mass movement will only take of with my martyrdom), I survive all the civil wars to the point that the revolution has attained global hegemony?

If that were the case, as the originator of this theory, wether I cared for it or not (not), as the idea would not have been seperated from the personality that uncovered it (me), I could well be seen as the personification of the idea. Hence, the moral dictatorship of martyrs, the historical mechanism by which all political leaders are kept in check by the masses & ALL personality cults are finally destroyed,would NOT properly speaking exist UNTIL the idea is freed from the (existence of the) personality that uncovered it.

For in such an unlikely, practically inconcievable (not least because I have absolutely no talent whatever of any description, except for revolutionary theory) scenario, fearful of a movement being led against them, or rather bearing my sanction (should they be seen as opportunists), other key/leading figures (remember, in such a case the moral dictatorship as a historical check would not actually exist thence yet) might push it on me - if only to avoid the aforementioned threat.

And if the idea is not immortalised, seperated from the personality by the death of the one that uncovered it, then the hegemony of matter over (mass) consciousness (via the personification of the idea - eg peoples blind faith in the leader figure) actually remains - eg no moral dictatorship of the martyrs by which the masses keep leaders in check.

Ironically this lack of a moral check (moral dictatorship of the martyrs) would lead to a continuing inertial faith in leaders, the consequances of which would be:

Too much (unchecked) power in one persons (or a coterie of leaders) hands, which:

Paradoxically means they would actually lack the authority to railroad through the neccessary commonwealth framework/ sacrifices for global reconstruction (which can only lead back to opportunistic pol/econ).

As we will examine later, in the context of room for automatic development on basis of hegemony of matter over consciousness, this is not a problem. But when, as now, the hegemony of consciousness over matter is imperative, to enable pol/econ development, this would represent a fatal break on development, requiring a new revolt or at least impeachment to consolidate popular rev dem power.

In such a scenario the only way to resolve this dialectical paradox is for me to take absolute responsibility for anything/everything of a capital nature that goes wrong in the movement & insist that I & only I be held accountable for all such after the revolution has vanquished the global military plutocratic threat & becomes hegemonic (whence the threat of such a leader figure THENCE becomes the greater threat).

The way this will certainly manifest itself is through an attempt (by myself, should I survive the civil wars & find myself in the power position) to railroad through the sacrifices for global reconstruction, resisted in turn by tax strikes & riots, precipitating my signing (in public) a capital order for the use of loyal troops to open fire/ use lethal force on such forces (specifying that as supreme authority I and only I, be held responsible for such, so as to transfer to myself from/ absolve commanders & troops of all responsibility for actions coming within the remit of the capital order).....

This would precipitate my impeachment, lead to my execution, & consolidation of the Revolution through a fait accompli. Eg there would be a political army knowing the need for such sacrifices, that would brook no more disorder from rioters, that would enforce the reconstructionist solution. The fact that the forces of disorder would not be able to agree on a common pol/econ program (that could be consoldiated) would mean they would lack unity of insurgent purpose, would be ever more readily dispersed; especially as the hunger for order would be overwhelming.

WHY this gruesome process? Of literal decapitation of the originator of the new rev theory?

For the Revolution to win state power requires a dynamic minority & the mere acquiesence of the majority. But to BUILD the Revolution, needs the ACTIVE co-operation (however initially unenthusiastic) of the majority. This in turn means that they must see, through an exhaustive fusion of political education with bitter experiance, that WARTIME econ sacrifices for global reconstruction are the only way forward/ to avoid the abyss.

.........all incipient elite threats are neutralised via my elimination - consolidating rev law against all elements that could threaten it.

For this be a paradox that lies at the very heart of the revolution, that can only be resolved thus, with the spectre of absolute power equating to absolute responsibility to cancel out the incipient (even though wholly undesired) caesarist threat.

UNTIL then of course there remains a war to be fought, my place must be on the frontline.

While this might, perhaps require something little short of human sacrifice (in that material responsibility attaches itself to me regardless of moral intention or even active involvement) to subordinate matter to the hegemony of consciousness (by eliminating the personification of the idea), the end entirely justifies the means, as long as the means do not negate the ends.

Furthermore, this (if it comes to it) will:

Create revulsion, a bulwark against all unneccessary bloodshed (as will the dictatorship of the martyrs anyway, by way of the authority/power to consolidate a rev reconstructionist framework) - as opposed to neccessary bloodshed.

Consolidate rev law over all & any that would put themselves above it, both any incipient opportunists in the revolution and amongst the defeated enemy.

- So stabilising the rev centre of gravity/rev commonwealth.

Post victory, it would be impossible for me to bugger of to the obscurity that I currently enjoy as I write this. For most people are incredibly lazy, they would expend no limit of effort to avoid thinking, IF the option remains available to them - to surrender to a leader. So therefore even the last most exceptionally untalented (as friends & foes will agree, this is NOT mere modesty on my part) option must be denied them.

To those that will ask, `Why should we campaign to free you if you are to be brought to trial if we actually succeed (and you survive to the final victory)?' -

The answer be that you are NOT fighting for me, but for the establishment of a state of law. The founding principle of which be, that the military plutocratic regime does not have the right to indict anyone for fighting fascism.

As to the Q, `What then is in it for you?'

To fail to act on what I have learnt, means to subordinate the idea to my life, to betray/ destroy the knowledge that I have learnt. If I wish to save my soul, I am obliged to follow the logic of what I have learnt into immortality (we shall examine the Q of the immortality of the idea in Vol II).

The positive (part of the) answer is power. REAL power. Not over man, not over land or finance, but through an idea - to be free from the imperium of military plutocracy - which if it & with it the whole world, is not to be consigned to oblivion, must be possessed by millions like me, eg the rank & file activist & indeed the citizenry in general.

Therefore, to avoid losing this power, indeed to bring it to fruition, I must follow its logic unto immortality (we shall examine the Q of the Immortality of the Idea, the God Dialectic in Vol II).

But if the nuclear plutocrats `win' & I fail, even if I have done everything I could to prevent the great catastrophe, I wouldn't want to exist in any dimension beyond death; looking back forever at complete failure, a world in ashes. The notion of `every soul for itself', that individual salvation is possible without human engineered global salvation (instead waiting for divine intervention to save the world from itself), is as diabolic as it is bourgeois.

In any case, wether I (stupidly) resist my fate or (wisely) embrace it, the New Model Political Army, cadres with steel in their hearts, that confront such brutal Qs, that have been systematically trained & drilled by the words of the author, will know their duty. It is to insure that the author is executed by the Revolution, to insure that humanity has nowhere left to run from the imperative of WARTIME econ sacrifices for global reconstruction.

Thus the spirit of Oliver Cromwell makes peace with that of the Levellers.
5 The Mob Versus

The Political Army

It is possible though (& historically has happened), that directionless rage can occur/ be whipped up on top of educated knowledge, when this knowledge has nowhere to go - eg when there is no room for dialogue within the system and no strategic framework for victory (as in the especially pre Chartist era) or cynically deployed as a substitute for/ lightening conductor away from attacking the enemy within a viable military political framework.

In this the case of Farrakhan is of particular relevance, as he has infleuence way beyond his immediate organisational base, even with leftwing blacks, in the USA; with his periodic demagogic calls for (here & there implicit, here & there explicitly racially based) war with the state, sounding (insanely suicidal as it would be) vastly more attractive than another humble petition to the state not to be so beastly to USA blacks. Though (multi racial) revolutionary civil war needs the military political framework we have outlined in S.O.F.

The point we are concerned with is that ONLY institutional laborism and Quantum Materialism (respectively) had/ have the capacity to consolidate their political positions. Anarchism (as evinced in the entertaining but strategically inept publication `Class War') & terrorism cannot.

In all cases `mob culture' be a substitute for/ lightening conductor away from attacking the enemy within a viable framework.

The Political Army is the total opposite. Martialed at a given time & place to accomplish through specific strategic actions/ specific strategic objectives (be said actions peaceful or violent), in accordance with a clearly defined strategic framework - its propaganda can (& must) reflect the strict military political discipline of this framework.

Revolutionaries, even when masses appear sympathetic, must always take care to push those points home which are hardest to swallow (& indeed seek to pre-empt such Qs) - vis sacrifices for reconstruction & `neutralising doomsday' strategy etc, instead of going for cheap applause, seek to ram home these lessons to educate the masses.

Better a shocked hostile public that will at least consider/ learn from our ideas (& develop a cold intelligent political killer instinct); than accursed (momentary) popularity from those that do not know the cost & therefore (as it has not been explained to them), are not willing to pay the price of victory.

Lenin said, `2 armies do not line up, one for the revolution, the other against'. But that is exactly how it must be. We must turn the whole people into political soldiers.