4 God Minimalism

Hope begins with the new (rev dem) martial culture - displacing the finance/sword skein (permeating/fundamentally reconstructing every macro/micro aspect of human existence - before disolving into stable equilibrium. The new martial culture is the foundation/scaffolding of the new pol/econ); based on the (martyr propelled) immortality of the idea, making viable the struggle for consciousness to gain hegemony over matter.

Previously, latent criticality did not exist - until the potential for automatic devlopment was exhausted.

Therefore (previously) inertia based on social differentiation (based on potential for automatic development and continuing hegemony of matter over consciousness; and therefore of the regimes' operational agenda) rendered the truth/new quantum materialist dialectic (targeting legitimacy/criminality of the regime) inert. UNTIL the present epoch of latent criticality (when all potential for automatic devlopment exhausted - causing free will to be raised to the level of a decisive primary historical factor).

Because we have reached a state of latent criticality, now it is possible to set up an explosive development, forcing people to think. Eg even if hostile to our movement, at least considering the questions we raise (concerning the criminality of this pol/econ regime), and (as it becomes clear there are no viable options on the basis of the regimes' hegemony), our program. A seismic tilting in our favor as a continuous process, forcing all to think and all to take sides.

Immortality of the idea (as we have seen) is indispensible to the struggle of consciousness to gain hegemony over matter.

This factor is manifest through a dialectic of God Minimalism.

Eg the principle of the absolute minimum (neccessary) engagement of a God current, the supreme potency of effectiveness/ engagement (minimum engagement with maximum effect). Effectively limited to the role of a supra reserve (as outlined in Vol II) as a key component in the struggle to finally break free from the primordial sludge (of the hegemony of matter over consciousness).

The dawn of the Revolutionary Superman is consummated through nuclear free will. Through the FUSION between rationalist dialectics and the immortality of the idea - at the point of blood sacrifice (- as part of the process of this epoch, becoming born and achieving hegemony).

(But) All faith as such, is idolatry. Only that which can be proven (by logic) is dialectically valid. To have a hunch and follow up/investigate is also (dialectically) legitimate, but to presume as PROVEN, on the basis of faith alone is not.

Eg the working philosophical assumption should be that God doesn't exist - even if one suspects that it does (eg must be proven by theory/evidence).

Eg there may or may not have been a God inspired beginning - but logically we must proceed, like good detectives, from where we are on the basis of any evidence in matter and theory.

To proceed from the false `Why' question, is to fabricate (without evidence) an answer before it is even certain that there is a question. To proceed from the anthroprocentric `Why' question is like a bent copper presuming (without any evidence) they have the killer, when a given incident could (on the basis of the lack of evidence uncovered) have an entierly different explanation - than the one superimposed (for the sake of conveniance) on the undeciphered evidence.

This is (a historic example of) the (egocentric) murder of logic, which (in all spheres of life) in turn is used to (buttress an egocentric ideology to ) perpetuate the arbitrary rule of an unaccountable and criminal elite by compelling obediance.

Obediance, otherwise called `faith' (eg in institutions, law etc over which the citizenry have no hegemonic power by force of arms and information), is indispensible for arbitrary power, is the true original sin of humanity.

Furthermore if God does exist (as we contend), to presume via ignorant, obediant faith, would give a totally false picture of the characteristics/nature of this God. This is not simply an either/or matter - it is also about the logical substance of any such deity.

ALL faith is idolatry. This (anthroprocentric god concept) is just a particular manifestation of a form of (inertial/ignorant) faith.

Church, Party or Framework?

The corollary of this neccessity of anti faith logic (compulsion to think, not faith. Indeed the antithesis of faith, which is subordinate to the hegemony of matter - as it does not pro-actively seek to gain, via knowledge, the hegemony of consciousness over matter), is that it is impossible to threaten people with the consequances of `Hell' (or whatever one might refer to a permanent state that might befall someone that subordinated their consciousness to hegemony of matter) etc.

Peoples' OWN consciences must be their judge. If they destroy/suppress their own conscience/knowledge - they must answer for any consequances themselves.

WE must concentrate solely on destroying the enemy physically - leaving any immortal fate to the God dialectic and their own consciences.

Church (as we have seen) is a utopian (priestly) construct within which (historically) the hegemony of matter could develop (via fragmentation of power - insuring capital accummalation independant from any Caesarist entity). Inevitably yielding/subordinate to the hegemony of matter (before disappearing into rationalism - also within the hegemony of, indeed the derivative of, matter).

Then what (from our movement) would threats of damnation amount to?

Ultimately (while superficially appearing extreme radical) it amounts to an appeal, indeed prostration to the hegemony of matter - by appealing to the consciences of (what for want of a better term might be) the damned (those subordinating their consciences to the hegemony of decomposing matter).

To re-iterate, OUR job is simply to get on with the job of destroying the enemy's hegemony and establishing socialist hegemony.

How thence, being a matter of individual conscience, is it possible to proclaim publicly the God dialectic? When ALL (God dialectic) is a matter of individual conscience?

It is NOT what we are FOR (we have no church, shibboleths, faith etc) that defines the God dialectic. It is what we are against that defines it. Eg NEGATIVE deployment.

Eg the entire cult of leaders (assosciated with traditional party construct), which be a manifestation of and ideologisation of - in a word, FAITH - in the hegemony of matter over consciousness; that sets itself above the/any moral dictatorship of the martyrs the moral/historical threat with which the masses can keep their leaders in check.

How is/was party able to do this?

Moral dictatorship could not be existant until (with the end of all potential for automatic development on basis of hegemony of matter over consciousness) a state of latent criticality had developed - enabling free will to become a primary historical factor, enabling the moral dictatorship of the martyrs to assert itself over leaders - consciousness over matter.

What is the Marxist/Leninist (as with Militant Labor etc) concept (indeed in general) of party?

Party is a top heavy construct based on the central committee/executive committee. Based on factional struggle within the/a labor party/agenda of the regime.

(Before a state of latent criticality had developed, with the exhaustion of automatic development - meaning free will not yet a primary historic factor & matter still had stable hegemony over consciousness. And therefore nought else possible).

Marxists (historically) prepare for political war, as we do for military war - vis role of the central executive.

Why C.C. based?

Because otherwise without rigid discipline (as working within the operational agenda of the regime) inevitably falls prey to rightist permeation (as it possesses no operational framework to control agenda of the labor party - working within agenda of capitalist hegemony).

That is, it needs a `democratic centralist' construct merely in order to keep the rev element (from breaking up completely) together in political struggle. Therefore nothing more than a rev element encapsulated within the hegemopny of the regimes' agenda, trapped like a bee in amber. (This as opposed to Framework, Front and Faction).

But now that free will (with exhaustion of potential for automatic development) is a primary historic factor, a rev framework based on a basic program (see C2 Vol1) within which every (even hostile factions, see C2 Vol1 vis N. Ireland) organ, individual, faction can join, is viable.

And as the new movement clearly is viable, it consequantly amounts to more than the diktats of a C.C.; therefore NOT C.C. based (in order merely to keep it together) but actually activist based. (Except for centralised command for military warfare/co-ordination).

So we have much flatter organs decentralised within a stable steel framework - which also have the positive benefit of making enemy/secret state penetration far less effective, as far more dilute (within a decentralised movement).

So (to remind ourselves) within a rev govt there be a collegiate of factions; with a shifting centre of gravity over time as equilibrium emerges/established. From parsimonious reconstructionist orientation to a social wage orientation - with accommadation for secondary currents arguing on need to consider private wages/individual initiative etc - WITHIN socialist hegemonic framework. That is, just as the enemy handed out reforms on the basis of its hegemony, we make similarly delimited adjustments (to reward skill/initiative) on the basis of ours - while not compromising on our general orientatation & military institutional hegemony.

As for the much vaunted `brain drain' there is already a brain drain of our best technicians - because they cannot get work here, because there is no investment in industry, because of the short termism of our finance sharks, because they can get away with it.

So negative deployment means just that, a refusal to fetishise God or man.

The whole concept of freedom, of being free from the bondage of the ignorance & treason of leader-worship is bound up with this negative deployment.

So the entire philosophy of Quantum Materialism can be projected in the idea of `Redemption Through Sacrifice' & the battle cry `God & Freedom!' - For without freedom there is no God, but without God, as we have demonstrated (in Vol II & now), freedom is beyond our grasp.

The SOLE purpose of any such blood oath (including `God & Freedom') is to underwite committment to sacrifice prior to fulfillment in battle or on hunger strike. To re-iterate, the ONLY function of the God Dialectic is to aid sacrifice - and therefore, the growth of the movement, as a direct result of that military sacrifice.

Concerning problems of the technical deployment of the God Dialectic (eg deep theory cannot be condensed as readily into leaflet form as the basic program & strategy can - which we shall see in `Intro to Quantum Materialism'). As we shall see more clearly when we study the Intro to QM, when we offer a slogan/leaflet, it is reasonable to hope people will buy study our intro pamphlet (Intro to Quantum Materialism) and from there, proceed to deep theory - before assessing the validity of our programmatic claims.

BUT, when we offer BLOOD, it is reasonable to hope people will directly study the deep theory - before assessing the validity of our philosophical claims. And correspondingly, the I-B recruitment posters etc, can be drawn up with this in mind (eg `Death To Fascism, For God, Commonwealth & Freedom, Join The Internationalist Brigades' - the past sacrifices/God Dialectic propelling the movement).

If `God & Freedom', why not `Allah & Freedom' or Christ & Freedom'?

Well, there can be no ban as such on such posters/propaganda (though on posters as opposed to battle cries, it be: `God, Commonwealth & Freedom'). But to strictly define the practical parameters of what be acceptable, ALL prospective I-Bs must first be asked if they pledge allegiance to the basic program. This means war against all and any that seek to deny ANY section of the citizenry their constitutional rights as free & equal citizens under the constitution. Then be invited to take the Blood- Oath:

`For God, Commonwealth & Freedom,

I pledge my lifeblood

to the Revolution,

I beg God, give me the courage

to do what must be done &

endure what must be endured'

(Please note only the underlined words be obligatory, the rest be optional/up to the individual) Before confirming recognition.

It be characteristic of the movement that all God concepts, Deist, Muslim, Christian etc will be open to philosophical challenge in no uncertain terms, in a way redolent of the New Model Army in the English Civil War.

For without freedom, there is no God. This is the precept underlying the basic program to which ALL I-Bs and Rev Commonwealth forces must pledge allegiance.

And no pope collaboraring with mafiosi, no pogrom mongering Paisleyite pastor, no fascist Ayatollah, no pogrom mongering BJP Brahmin will be able to hide behind the right of religous freedom when being judged for their criminal activities - For I-Bs, Rev Commonwealth forces, the movement as a whole, allegiance to revolutionary law, to the freedom it defends, cuts dead all loyalties to any such criminal element, whatever their philosophical allegiance, claiming `Godly' sanction.

But while all be determined by/under control of the basic program there be no compulsion whatever to sign up to Dialectical deism. And no one, atheist, Deist, Christian, Muslim, Jew etc that supports the basic program - can be turned away for no better reason than that they did not sign up to the Deist theory.

Yet it is clear now, that where before the onus was to prove that God existed, NOW at a philosophical level, the onus be on others, atheist or any other allegiance, to disprove this theory. (Though to re-iterate, support for the basic program be the only pre-condition to join the movement).

But, if I be right in my conclusions (as of course I reckon I am) then ultimately the dialectical deist approach will ultimately subsume all other allegiances - as the obscurantist dogma in them, which has no practical value for the revolution, increasingly gets trashed by cadres. As it be most consistent, leaving behind nowt but the morbid husks of obscurantist dogma for the reaction.

It should be stated that the liquidation of the nat sec state by the revolution (as outlined previously via seperation of powers) gaurentees that there be no moves to curtail any such freedom - where it does not clash with the law/constitution, eg gaurenteeing freedom to others. And indeed acts as a bulwark/gauretor against one priest based religion seeking state favors over and/or the sectarian repression of another.

If as we contend the dialectical deist god concept because of its logic/consistency subsumes/supersedes all others, it will be solely due to its value in aiding blood sacrifice for the constitutional freedom that the revolution brings.

The nuclear Q appears as a part of a built in program to the development of intelligent life.

The principle of military-economic development of the war finace nexus, means that intelligent life be unable to discover such weaponry until it had attained a certain level of development. Or else intelligent life would continually wipe itself out before consciousness even had the remotest chance to attain hegemony over matter.

And yet this very threat to intelligent life, of wiping itself out, be indisolubly bound up with the rev reconfiguration of the global pol/econ. Just as every Christ needs its' Anti-Christ, so the revolution needs the very real threat of oblivion to drive it forward.

Annihilation cannot be prevented on the basis of a nat sec state - for this means the super proliferation of a police state to prevent the acquisition of the knowledge, which directly or, most critically, INDIRECTLY enables them to create weapons of mass dstruction. It must be clear to all, that the great mass of humanity, and therefore civilisation in absolute terms; cannot get very far without acquiring a productive knowledge which indirectly AS A BY-PRODUCT gives them the knowledgde of how to destroy on a mass scale.

For such a reversal of the process of knowledge accumalation can only be achieved at the expense of catastrophic econ implosion, which (taking place anyway as a consequance of the implosion of the war/finance nexus) leads to fascism and nuclear warlordism anyway - For no-one `...gaurds the gaurds..', when they remain a law unto themselves.

And yet, as we can see, knowledge on the basis of the war/finance nexus (hegemony of matter over consciousness), can only speed our oblivion.

As we have seen, the only hope for the survival of humanity is human consciousness gaining hegemony over matter, that is via the immortality of the idea/blood sacrifice - civil society gaining hegemony over finance.

For it be only through the ascendancy of such a commonwealth of collective self interest that the violent and destructive acquisition of power & wealth for its own sake, be displaced by the acquisition of knowledge for its own sake- So that dignity being manifest in what one has contributed/created, displaces the murderous, currently prevailing impulse, to grasp at all costs. In which knowledge merely be used as a weapon more terrible than any other. As seen by the horrors of the nuclear, military- biological, military- chemical & assorted other military industrial complexes and the diabolic speculator/corporate interests that use this nat sec state regime to buttress their criminal hegemony.

For only thence be there security for all, and such knowledge not be used for foul ends.

There is redemption for all humanity, even the enemy through the (their) children, our collective future. In this, the immortality of the idea is made flesh.

In conclusion, one & all must possess a holy terror of the very idea of the love of power for its own sake, within oneself and humanity generally - the curse of humanity. The only viable defense against it is redemption through sacrifice (as needs must unto death) which in turn be buttressed by the immortality of the idea.

Obediance and love of power for its own sake be the twin fountains of chaos, the latter cannot exist as a threat, without the former. For all classical political currents complain that they `do the best (as much as) they can' - within (what they be allowed by) the military plutocratic regime. Which serving none but their own plundering interest, be the arch apostles of chaos themselves.

But power through our movement, can only be effectively wielded through blood sacrifice. The martyrs in fact having the power of moral democratic dictatorship, are the mechanism by which the rank & file can keep their leaders in check.

There is a very real sense in which, the campaign will not have been fully launched until I am removed from the field. Eradicating the personal as a historical factor - leaving nowt but the program, theory & campaign confronting the enemy (and of course, the alternative to my sacrifice, is the raising of the - esp MY - personality above the idea, which of course means subordination of the movement to the hegemony of matter over consciousness - which means rapid death to the revolution).

I make no secret of my intention to seize through martyrdom, the moral dictatorship, and use the position to put an end to all personality cults.

Eg anyone erecting a bird shit splattered statue of myself for the edification of the people, to be assassinated/executed, treated as a would be Caesar or Caesarist (eg as with the cult of Lenin, all such are invariably used to buttress blind obediance to Caesarist or sub Caesarist currents in power - as with Stalin). For the avoidance of Caesarism and in turn, nuclear waorlordism, depends on such measures, to keep all such military plutocratic pretensions in check.

Instead an iron morning star atop a rough black granite plinth - as (redolent of prehistoric standing stones) simple general monuments to ALL revolutionary martyrs should be erected.

The Revolution should erect NO grandiloquent statues at all. Only martyrs' memorials as outlined above. The only true tribute to revolutionary martyrs is to rebuild the world. Let the ideological fossils (statues) of past regimes remain as an indictment of a darker age.