WHEN does global chaos begin? Accounting for grave errors in my previous communiqué `Outflanking USA Hyperfascism’.

 

            The above Q has (consciously/ subconsciously) tormented me/ racked my brains of late.

            Hitherto, I simply reckoned (from about late 2004 till very recently) `The Iran war was the precise point of chaos & all before then, was an unstable order. The USA will get their Iran war because they have control of the geo political economic agenda, by virtue of their insanity, until the Iran war.’

            My last (dangerously imprecise) communique `Outflanking USA Hyperfascism’**********

 

 

 


Outflanking USA Hyperfascism

 

When Israel, as a proxy force of the USA regime, widens its offensive to an assault on Syria, in order to draw in Iran (with whom Syria has a strategic alliance) into launching attacks on Israel; at all costs, Iran must not rise to the bait.

For nothing could be more disastrous than a war between Israel & Iran.

It is infinitely preferable that Iran finds itself involved in war with USA – the better enabling it to crash the petrodollar by targeting the oilfields to get the eastern bankers to dump the $ & go 4 gold, to end the agony sooner rather than later.

Wheras it is quite possible USA would NOT intervene as expected in a war between Iran & Israel (as the momentum of such a war rapidly outstrips the momentum of Israeli protestations of USA treachery), that consequently nothing would come of war with Israel except Iranian annihilation, by Israel – allowing USA regime to say `we did not do it’ (for USA regime, this is the line of least resistance); with Israel a deranged expansionist pariah, probably even nuked/ attacked by USA in a `police action’ to `restore order’ (eg after `Eratz Ysrael’ has `fulfilled the Biblical prophecies’ & made things difficult for USA by its expansionist hubris, as you’d expect of those who reject `Our Lord & Saviour’ compelling USA to `restore order’) – to place the whole world under the USA nuclear cosh (if they are mad enough to threaten/ plan/ prosecute nuclear war against Iran to prop up the petrodollar, they are capable of any horror & we must assume & make contingency for such), in a vain attempt to prop up the petrodollar through sheer terror.

Vain because this means threatening/ attacking not only Pakistan but China, indeed all its creditors, whose capacity to prop up the (inherently hyperinflationary) petrodollar is not limitless; & because such insane arrogance run amok only fuels the kind of hubris that they can get away with anything through such threats that it becomes a drug, the first option to be reached for in all dialogue in all social, political, economic intercourse of any kind. ALL restraint, & with it all humanity, is cast to oblivion before the solipsism of the moment.

 

To this end, if Syria is attacked by Israel, Iran should openly declare that as this is an attack by a self evident USA proxy on its ally, only the oil will be targeted to target the petrodollar if attacks continue, but hold its fire as long as can be to the point of absolute humiliating unbearability. When the whole world has had sufficient opportunity to absorb said rules of engagement (so this message should be repeated) & Iran’s own internal resolve is as consolidated as can be, that it is prepared for/ resigned to the hard road ahead.

Beginning, at the point at which war with Israel is the only otherwise unavoidable alternative, with Iran attacking oil tankers in the gulf. A relatively light restrained but signally determined response, designed to force USA to cease hiding behind its Israeli proxy & so it must either agree to restrain Israeli attacks on Syria or commit itself to war with Iran enabling Iran to raise the stakes by all out targeting of the oilfields to get the eastern bankers to dump the $ & go 4 gold to end the agony sooner rather than later…

At every point/ instant throughout (until USA wages war on Iran), the USA must be offered peace if it restrains its proxy, but simultaneously be denied war on the strategic (eg Israel/ Iran) or political (eg which prevent Iran as in any way the aggressor) terms most convenient to it.

 

For the USA has already begun WWIII, via the ongoing sustained attack on the Palestinians to soften up global psychology for the assault on Syria/ Iran. & if this goes unchecked, the whole world will perish under the USA nuclear cosh.

 


***********was prompted by a semi conscious shift in my thinking on the matter.

            Hitherto my eye had been on the effort by USA to secure their Iran war. I had paid relatively scant regard to the diplomatic attempts to stop this because I reasoned such would ultimately fail.

            THIS WAS A BIG MISTAKE ON MY PART.

            For I then concluded that as USA would/ were pursuing a different track to the Iran war (using Israel as its proxy to engineer such), that the diplomatic efforts to stop such were a relative irrelevance. In fact I did not actually consciously reason such, I instinctively drew this conclusion simply because such would be outflanked.

             THIS WAS A BIG MISTAKE ON MY PART.

 

            The Q I should have focussed on but did not (to be blunt, given the way I think, it is one of those mistakes I have/ had to have made to know it was such) is WHEN does a pre Iran war manifestation of chaos (leading to the Iran war) clearly eclipse diplomacy to prevent Iran war via the diplomatic level?

 

            THIS Q HAS ONLY JUST, 10TH JULY 2006, OCCURRED TO ME AS THE GUIDING PRINCIPLE FOR AMENDING MY WORK.

 

It can be the Iran war itself. But I am working on a range of other scenarios (for when global chaos can be said to have eclipsed diplomacy) the first significant attack on Syria, the destruction of the Dome of the Rock in Jerusalem, the assassination of Hamas PA PM Haniyeh; as the point of chaos eclipsing diplomacy when warnings such as I advocate in `Outflanking USA Hyperfascism’ would THEN constitute a relative restraint & consequently have the role I envisaged in `Outflanking USA Hyperfascism’, rather than possibly eclipsing diplomacy.

 

I do not of course, rule out other options/ interpretations I simply have not thought of yet.

 

 

My Profoundest Apologies for any confusion caused by my previous communiqué `Outflanking USA Hyperfascism’

 

 

Adam Ghaznavi