(Provisional Draft)
Substance Over Form
Conceptually Outgunning
(By Adam G. Ghaznavi)
1) The Battle of Jerusalem
Conceptually
Outgunning
USA
Rapture Psychology
2) Nuclear Shotgun Wedding
3) The Jihad For the Global Constitution
4) The Apocalyptic Triangulation of the USA
Empire
5) Programmed For Self Destruction
6) Paradoxes of the Human Soul
7) The Edge of Beyond
USA Rapture Psychology
If (as at 25/6/05 – seems increasingly unlikely) the USA
empire looks too strong in the mideast, it hubristically drifts into attacking
Iran & Israeli settler hubris destroys the Dome of the Rock…
& if (with USA looking too weak to engage in Iran
war), the internal focus of the USA shifts away from foreign adventure (especially against the backdrop of the
trial of Saddam Hussein & the consequent global legitimacy crisis), it will shift back onto the USA budget/ trade deficits ($7
Trillion in total/ $700 Billion annualised – respectively), the fact that USA
institutional resistence to Iran war has NO answer to such presaging
a collapse of the dollar, soaring interest rates, catalysing a global credit
crunch/ hyperinflation & apocalyptic geo pol/econ tailspin – the spectre of
which – before or after – leads back by default towards USA bombworshippers
being in open control of the agenda/ apocalyptic foreign adventure (Iran war
& destruction of the Dome of the Rock) – if only to retain control of the
geo pol/econ agenda for 5 minutes more…
…leading to oil being turned off/ descent into primal
panic/ race war etc…
it should also be emphasised that if USA were simply to
withdraw from Iraq, this would decisively shift the psycho political focus of
USA’s old Islamic fascist cold war allies, to attacking USA directly itself
(especially in the context of chasing USA out of Iraq) which would also
precipitate nuclear war…
& forced retreat from Iraq would/ will otherwise lead
to a fusion of pol/econ chaos (as focus shifts to USA budget/
trade deficit), unfolding chaos in mideast (with or without Al Qaeda attacks on
USA) leading to Iran being held responsible (by a president with a default
command of the agenda)& a (probably nuke) strike on Iran to bring on the
`Rapture’…
The key point is any attempt to even temporarily engage
in a partial retreat from Iraq (for USA mid term elections) leads to a rolling
inexorable dynamic that is irreversible/ gathers its own momentum. & yet,
if no such is undertaken, the presidents centre will collapse in
any case leading to inexorable pressure making his position extremely weak.
Leading therefore to a dynamic of
disorderly psycho political & military retreat…
Compared to this, prior bombings
(eg in London as ar 23/7/05 etc) are only significant insofaras they may feed
into the psychology of disorderly retreat (through heightened racial tension,
weakening Britain in the eyes of the USA people as a point of support).
Or, more spectacularly, if through
Al Qaeda/ offshoot nuke strike etc, the psycho political economic heartbeat of
the metropolitan core itself (loss of key points of control at home or abroad)
was stopped catalysing the deathspiral.
& given the psycho pol/econ
desperation/ insanity catalysed, in any case all leads back to the Iran war
& its consequences (with or without USA attack on other states).
The reason for this is that the
(British) homegrown Jihadi culture which has vast strategic depth…
Vis language/ defuseness/ global
contacts – hugely superior to anything the IRA had, except critically in terms
of a defensible territory & a
community that (with whatever reservations) saw them as their defenders (in the
way that Martin Mcguiness was defacto minister of defense for the Nationalist
community in Ulster) rather than as revanchist fascists bringing fire down on
their heads
…is however rendered generally
abortive by the racewar backlash dynamic – which itself as it
leads to spectre of anarchy as it acquires social political weight is also
rendered partially abortive until said military geo pol/econ
meltdown catalyses the deathspiral…
…so that peculiarly it is
corresponding weakness of the British state that scares enough of
those sympathetic to Jihadis into submission &/ or shifting their focus
entirely to defense & away from the luxury of anything that may feed the
backlash; that (barring Al Qaeda nuke strike) means it is only when geo
pol/econ meltdown occurs in Iraq/ USA, that said process gathers inexorable
momentum…
The point being that Mutually
Assured Destruction in all its myriad forms, is dependant not merely upon
computer programs, buttons & wires; but on human blood, bone, thought &
the tripwires of human desperation we shall see how to defuse…
Yet, to think it is JUST a Q of counterposing revolutionary
global security frameworks/ geo pol/econ reconstructionist programs especially wartime
econ sacrifices for solar powered desalination…
Enabled via a managed depression – secure/ stable oil supplies at a high price…
Partially
analogous to the way that defeat for Britain in USA war of independence closed
of any illusory prospect of passing on costs of falling rate of mercantile
profit onto colonists; forcing pol/econ reconfiguration/ a longwave switch of
cheap capital (from mercantile trading) towards industrial development,
preparing way for longwave boom
The chief difference being, the
previous case was an entirely organic process…
(aided by captive markets in India, forced to buy
industrially manufactured cotton cloth while the competition was suppressed – a
crude symbiosis of war & finance)
…wheras commitment to solar powered desalination requires exercise of conscious global political will – impelled by threats of oblivion if we do not.
…neccessary vis:
1) Sustainable energy & global energy security
Eg given ease of targeting
pipelines, development of new supplies only possible on basis of raising living
standards in new oil producing locale itself - which over the long run
increases aggregate demand outstripping supplies brought on stream by said
locale – exacerbating/ accelerating shortage problems
Furthermore the consequent (national security state/ oil energy baron
centred secureaucratic) geo pol/econ agendas & (corresponding global
finance credit expansionary imperium) have a terminal tendancy to promote
commodity fetishistic/ insanely short termist consumptive patterns..
2) Halt the charge into the environmental abyss - vis combined dynamics of global warming/ ice age
Eg accelerated greenhouse
effect, leading to drying out/ ignition/ burning of Amazon/ Congo carbon sinks,
washing into/ saturating the oceans - a double impact on/ catalysing the
release of massive amounts of methane - melting polar caps/ turning of gulf
stream leading to mini (or worse) ice age.
3) The Permanent Revolution - Reconfigure (from top to bottom & centre) the entire global social (& political) economic balance of power - permanently
Away from apocalyptic national security state/ oil energy baron
centred secureaucratic agendas & (corresponding) global finance imperium;
& towards global civil society (`an Englishman's/ African women's home is
his/ her power station').
Eg establishing a substantive
soveriegnty of the individual - which can be pooled to block any
resurgence of plutocratic pol/econ power (with all the apocalyptic consequances
such entails).
Eg as an exponential increase in
number of nuclear power stations, would be catastrophically prone to budgetry
cutbacks effecting safety, such a policy…
(even if not as almost certainly be, inherently abortive - at the geo psycho pol/econ level, eg an instinctive gut awareness of its unviability preventing such holding the centre over the short/ medium term anyway)
…would lead to an apocalyptic geo pol/econ chain reaction of dozens/
hundreds of Chernobyls.
4) Positive impact technology
Eg a long term weapon in the
battle against desertification/ enabling farming in the Sahara, so new carbon
sinks elsewhere; to buy (more) time capital for humanity, in the war to
develop the further measures required to bring the environment into
sustainable/ managed equilibrium (eg this will not be the end nor even the
beginning of the end, but it will be, the end of the beginning).
…as an antidote to & propelled by everyone’s fear of apocalyptic
chaos (from all quarters)…
…is to miss the point about what kind of narrative propels USA geo psychology & therefore what kind of global vision (contextualising said geo strategic frameworks/ geo pol/econ reconstructionist programs – propelled by everyone’s fear of apocalyptic chaos from all quarters) is required to eclipse it…
To note, the underlying logic behind current
USA military plutocratic involvement in the mideast is highly complex/ meshed.
Most straightforward be the dynamic set in train by Sept 11th 2001
(Bin Laden demonstrating his ingratitude to his old CIA benefactors).
Sept 11th
2001 as much as anything an act of psycho political transference. Eg as Islamic
fascists could not possibly be in any way to blame for the condition of states
where their ideology predominated in alliance with USA imperium, everything
therefore had to be USA's fault, so (to follow this internal logic/ narrative)
it was for Islamic fascists to so seize the initiative...
After which invading Afghanistan seemed a pisspoor measure to restore damaged USA prestige...
Eg as the
unwritten law be that an American's life is worth so much more than many in the
3rd world; it was neccessary to raise the ante to `restore order' in
terms of geo psychology (to show who's boss) Eg some brown people had
attacked America, therefore vastly more brown people had to become directly (as
opposed to indirectly) subject to the vagaries of American power.
This meant of course, attacking Iraq...
(or
nuking somebody - we have Tony Blair to thank for going along with the capital
criminal Iraq war, to act as a moral hostage able to slow down, for a period,
this psycho political impulse – eg even the likes of Senator John McCain was
quick to call for use of nukes vis Sept 11th, & he is by no means the
nuttiest).
Which meshed with other prior objectives
(pre Sept 11th) of securing oil resources & insuring USA strategic
supremacy `full spectrum dominance' (as per official stated USA policy);
propping up USA finance speculative/ credit expansionary based system, for a
while longer.
But these are only the sane policies, which
seamlessly tip over into, pursuing the objective of (totally
insane) USA `Rapture' psychology
Specifically the idea of a kind of an `American
Israel' where `USA is chosen by God to lead the world to the Kingdom of
Christ…’...
(eg as
especially such unrestrained power needs to justify itself to
itself, `divine sanction' neccessary as legitimising ideology/ narrative
- which (as at 12 Jan 2005) over 50% of USA population adheres to; BEFORE
any major apocalyptic geo pol/econ tailspin (eg vis dollar collapse) pushes
them into primal panic/ desperation...
...To remove obstacles percieved to be hindering the
fulfillment of prophecies/ preconditions for the `Rapture' & Christ’s'
second coming...
...Specifically to enable Israel
(strengthen its position, enabling it) to demolish the Dome of the Rock,
rebuild the temple, after which, as per Revelations 7:4, the Jews
shall be punished for their failure to acknowledge King Jesus & be reduced
from 30 million to 144,000 (the inevitable/ inexorable failure of such a policy
to stabilise control of the oil - obviously being the perfidious Jews’ fault;
vis their failure to acknowledge King Jesus); whereupon our Lord & Saviour,
shall `Rapture' up (to heaven) our apple pie munching bretheren & smite the
rest of us....
Meanwhile, in the real world, the use of nukes propels at
least 2 general apocalyptic geo pol/econ dynamics:
1) Such violent hostility
among ever widening swathes of Iranians etc that USA nukes be used against
Iranian troop/ non state, popular paramilitary concentrations, stimulating ever
widening firestorms of hatred from all humanity, leading not only to the oil
being turned of/ corresponding geo pol/econ collapse, but the whole world on a
nuclear hair trigger (USA: `We've started so we'll finish'..)
2) & occurring both
entirely independant of the above factor, & catastrophically
catalysed by it, the aforementioned econ collapse/ primal panic.
Nuclear strike on Iran cannot terrorise the world in a
way which will stabilise it for a period under USA nuclear terrorist hegemony;
but leads to immediate global collapse.
So USA has merely a choice between 2 options for collapse
of its position. Nuking Iran, or wait for its position in Iraq to collapse
(including vis global legitimacy crisis vis trial of Saddam Hussein - see
`Apocalyptic Triangulation of the USA Empire & the Omega Option' in
`Lucifer2TM.zip’ for details).
The straightforward USA econ based collapse
is not theoretically impossible, but less likely – as the reflexive
impulse to attempt to retain control of the geo pol/econ agenda likely to lead
to ever more desperate ventures
Even the Indian Ocean Tsunami factor can only delay/
& therefore make more stark/ desperate the issue, not eclipse it.
No conventional state policy can arrest
this inexorable geo psychology.
Eg a China bluff to threaten to sell (vast reserves of)
dollars (to prevent attack on Iran or even to defend Russian territorial
integrity from increasingly desperate/ insane USA aided attempts to foment a
rising in the interests of elite/ compradorist elements more amenable to USA
interests)…
Eg the only thing even partially/ temporarily convincing USA regime not to attack iran, is that the USA regime does not wish to be saddled with even more conspicuous responsibility for the geo pol/econ fallout – with all that entails…
Therefore they have to prepare (beforehand) their public base, in order to share around the moral culpability, to avoid being brought to account & this as mentioned, takes critical time…Eg before, by going along with Iraq war, Blair slowed down USA impulse to use nukes…
…but, going along this time, vis Iran war would do NO
such thing; & not going along with Iran war, while unquestionably vastly
preferable, is only of limited (though extremely welcome) value
in slowing down USA imperial apocalyptic impulse. Conversely in some respects
actually feeding USA apocalyptic laager. Though the alternative
(more) happy go lucky apocalyptic psychology, leaves all humanity just as dead
& more quickly so.
As USA regime has the operational
initiative granted them by virtue of their sheer insanity - until the center
collapses – unleashing Americas’ fear of America (as the bombworshippers come
out under their own banner – even as they be part of something that terrifies
them more than any other deathcult in all history) the key to humanity seizing
control of the geo pol/econ agenda & with it, its’ own conscious destiny……
…eg dealing with apocalyptic threat
of USA rapture psychology gives Revolution command of the geo strategic agenda,
enabling it to deal with all other apocalyptic threats from all other quarters.
In the 4th section of this pamphlet we will examine how the
Revolution consolidates this process at the geo cultural level in `The
Universalist Conception’.
The
Battle of Jerusalem
Post aforementioned geo pol/econ collapse (see Communique
Number 1), the Battle of Jerusalem (though not
referred to as such in Communique Number 1) is the decisive
geo strategic point whereby the entire global agenda (global security framework; which sets the agenda for
the global constitutional framework; which in turn sets the terms for the global
pol/econ agenda) is decisively
shifted from the sphere of military (specifically military plutocratic &
warlordist) control, to the arena of (geo) political psychology - the battlefield of peoples’ minds.
Eg it is absolutely impossible to
impose a settlement by force. The only viable use of force (as outlined in
`Communique Number 1’), is that deployed in such a way so as to prevent hostile
parties from slaughtering each other for just long enough so as to
preserve a sufficient space in peoples’ minds, to allow the new rev geo
security/ constitutional & pol/econ settlement to kick in.
In this vein, ` neutralizing
doomsday’ strategies are outlined in event of use of nukes by one element or
another in `Communique Number 1’ & `Intro to Quantum Materialism’ in
Lucifer2TM.zip’.
This process while centred on Israel/ Palestine Q, is designed (woven in with said
Israel/ Palestine Q) to force global security trade offs – especially vis
control of nuke weapons – which process in turn sets the agenda for/ defines
the parameters of the global constitutional &
pol/econ settlement (especially for solar powered desalination – to quench the
thirst for revenge/ support for revanchist ideologies)…
…at each step of the way the spectre
of global oblivion (among all hostile parties) is exploited to force progress,
& the decisive point/ showdown is where all of humanity are challenged to
come out onto the streets to actively
endorse/ railroad through said global
security framework on pain of corresponding oblivion if they do not.
The global focus for this process is the `Battle of Jerusalem’ when the political
commander of (British) forces is, must be arraigned for blocking the transfer
of the last piece of Palestinian territories back to the Palestinians; until Pakistan (after Britain destroys its nukes – a
process monitored especially by the Russians) gives a formal commitment to
destroying (all, but beginning with) 50% of its nukes, to be carried out after Israel hands over last of 1967 territories…
In exchange for which Pakistan gets control of the global
presidency in Jerusalem (Pakistan destroys remaining nukes), positioning it to
focus attention on the breaking of Hindu fascism in India; by among other
things rebuilding the Barbary Mosque in Ayodhya and a globalist
vision that eclipses Hindu fascism in India (enabling re-unification).
Eg for South Asian troops to lead permanent global onsite control & monitoring of ALL USA
nuke installations (all such transferred to global control for agreed global
purposes eg asteroid strikes/ the thermonuclear linear shear lancing of the
Yellowstone Caldera & after the water has been drained from its volcanic
dams, the systematic reduction of the Cumbre Veja volcano – eg as it is more
& more the case that the knowledge to create brings with it the knowledge/
power to destroy, you cannot abolish such knowledge/ technologies, but you can
& must subject them to global monitoring & control for agreed purposes
– as outlined in `Communique Number 1’ in `Lucifer2TM.zip’.).
If at any stage USA attempts to block this process, eg from the removal of the Hebron settlers to the last USA nuke installations coming under global control, the oil is turned of by (incipient) Medina Commonwealth…
The capital of which be Palestine/
East Jerusalem –
…(this framework be mutually preferable to confrontations with Israeli missile command)
…But critically, the global security context that in turn enables Medina to conquer its own internal demons…
(a process examined in next section
`Historical Liquidation of the Apocalypse Legends’)
…is a framework of (aforementioned) South Asian consolidation of the Revolution (security) settlement with role of Europe, which in context of unfolding apocalyptic chaos, can only avoid its’ brushfires turning into firestorms/ anarchy by being redefined as the transitional bulwark of emergent Global Commonwealth Confederation…
(we examine how this is done in
`Communique Number 1’)
…blocking USA apocalyptic expansionism in order to free up USA visionary expansionism
(not
just for solar powered desalination – but also for the `Universalist
Conception’ which we shall examine in the 4th section of this
pamphlet.).
If Pakistan renages, the threat of
non eclipsed Hindu fascism threatens it.
As given the past role of Britain,
this is paradoxically BOTH necessary & AND outrageously unacceptable, I have
to be put on trial. The Iranians being the best to lead this (natural leaders vis
mideast oil; able to turn it of if we refuse) – vis western machinations in
mideast…
…I will then (quite properly) be
sentenced to death, suspended for 100 days, to allow my hunger strike `Battle of Jerusalem’ to call for popular endorsement of
said global security framework…
…politically centred
on Jerusalem as the capital of the Global Commonwealth Confederation (defined
by culture of common threats/ objectives confronting all humanity – most
immediately solar powered desalination as the centre of global security).
The Medina
Commonwealth (capital: East Jerusalem) united as a single superstate providing
stable supplies of expensive oil – enabling/ catalyzing development of/ shift
to solar powered desalination.
…by the whole world (as Iranians etc cannot possibly be
expected to take the word of a single western politician for gold coin) on pain
of oblivion/ anarchy if they do not…
The mothers being the vanguard/
moral force best placed to lead this process, enabling the eclipse of the paradox of arms, that we need the right to bear arms to keep in check
a potential resurgent nuclear/ military plutocratic tyranny but to be effective
this right must not actually be used; therefore the mothers as the decisive
vanguard/ moral force in the world, enable the resolution of this paradox. Eg
the calculus of all force from the state, paramilitary/ even vigilante, to
avoid chaos, must from the beginning all be gyro stabilized by this Jerusalem
centred focus – eg force is only of value in that it keeps hostile factions
apart for just long enough to allow the Revolution settlement to kick in…
The Historical Liquidation of the Apocalypse Legends
In the event of this plan working, I
remain in power until last of 1967 lands handed back, Pakistan destroys half
its’ nukes; handing over power to Pakistan’s chosen figurehead who will complete Pakistan’s
nuke disarmament after my execution.
…further motivated by consolidatory
geo psycho political shockwave effect of such (& the power of oil) to chasten
any (in any case largely self ruined) USA military plutocrats.
I (or whomsoever
else be in political command of the British Army – vis gameplan outlined in
`Communique Number 1) must be beheaded by a Saudi
executioner (the more
blood on his hands the better) in East Jerusalem (the capital of Medina
Commonwealth), the sword immediately destroyed afterwards for optimal cultural
impact. No other ceremony, gimmicks etc, before, during or after. Nothing that
detracts from the stark simplicity of the act - which itself is praxis the
final completion of theory & practice, the consolidation of the global
constitutional & legal framework.
But
it does not end there. Because as Mecca functions as a cultural vortex, destablising any state not big
enough geographically, geo politically & culturally to eclipse it…
(hence
the pact between Saudi Royals & Islamic fascists – to avoid being
culturally outflanked by apocalyptic nihilists)
…it
will only be the manifest
fact that such are self
evidently their own worst enemies which shall force the citizenry of Medina
Commonwealth to embrace the currently unthinkable on pain of the self destruction of their state (& with it the
whole world) if they do not.
Eg just as Muslims administer the Holy Sepulchre in Jerusalem – preventing general war among the Christian states/ factions, so, after Israel has got rid of its nukes
(at
a time of Israels’ choosing – Israel having no oil weapon to contain any threat
to its existence & no longer being able to rely for their security, on the
demented USA bombworshippers who would destroy them anyway)
…so that Israel no longer is in any residual way/ or even can be seen as a threat (in the interim, control of oil is sufficient to gaurentee Medina’s security), Jewish authorities should be invited to administer Mecca.
& I, or whomsoever fills said
role, shall use their last speech immediately before their execution to call
for such – so that blood fixes the solution in the citizenry’s minds even
before the last storm is clearly manifest in its truest form, to be so
curtailed. Extinguishing the last diabolic hopes of the USA bombworshippers.
In fact Israel’s role as gaurentor be the
historical precondition for the consolidation of the permanent union of the
mideast (Medina Commonwealth – preventing fratricidal abyss), specifically the
globally re-inforced emphasis on solar powered desalination – which be
dependant on the new global security architecture, as same be dependant (as a
psycho political/ historical/ developmental objective & accomplished fact)
on solar powered desalination…
For the split second the sword kisses my neck to the moment it severs my head, I
reign as last king (of the whole world)…
immediately
before this (kiss of steel) I am a Republican: & afterwards for the 20
seconds or so before I die, I become again a good Republican…
…& so take to the grave (crematorium) sufficient of the
power of the apocalypse legends with me…
…(eclipsed by culture of the common
threats/ objectives confronting all humanity) to enable effective cultural as
well as formal/ legal consolidation of the developing geo constitutional/ legal
framework/ process.
But beyond this, my execution serves
as the focal/ historical point of
transcendence.
When a humanity forced to assert/ proclaim of its’ own free will the necessity of
a single global constitutional framework (by a combo of `Battle of Jerusalem’
with decisively resurgent apocalyptic threats if they do not)
…covering & holding accountable all humanity
are (by this final removal of all obstacles/ residual alternatives)…
…irrevocably forced (in spite of every innate/ primal
fear of doing so) to accept decisive stewardship of its own conscious destiny
(the hegemony of a conscious humanity over its own creation/
destiny)…
The climactic point of 4 Billion years of Earth evolution, when intelligent life finally (in spite of all inbuilt/ innate primordial impulses to the
contrary) asserts its ascendancy over the primordial slurry from which it
emerged & threatens to descend back into…
& how could it be otherwise?
For a humanity/ consciousness NOT created in the image of a supreme being (by some micro
managing celestial Saddam Hussein) but emerging out of matter/ creation, as an independent entity...
But much more (to break its’
auto self destruct programming) humanity needs a vision cast far beyond itself (in order to stabilize even the overarching culture
of the common threats/ objectives confronting all humanity)…
…drawing strength/ courage from its’
creator – so that it can master itself as a conscious free
entity; to know its’ creator on its’
own terms, as conscious master of its’ own destiny.
I cannot emphasise too strongly that
the Battle of Jerusalem has to be seen from the outset of the entire rev
process, as the center of its consolidation – if it is to avoid losing its way/
collapse into anarchy. Therefore every single decision has to be taken with
respect to this lodestar, which must redefine the entire global agenda.
As whomsoever seeks to
establish new global security architecture at Jerusalem (as needs must), will
inevitably be branded `antichrist’ (by USA bombworshippers) & the most
dangerous idea, arising out of 4 billion years of earth evolution (10,000 years
of the war/ finance nexus), is that humanity cannot master itself…
…must rely instead
upon a divine saviour (riding to glory on a mushroom cloud)… as evinced in the
Legends of `the fall’…
There is therefore, no
choice whatever but to turn this to advantage & launch an all out frontal
assault against this entire mode of thinking (hence also the `Lucifer2’ marque
as the only possible marque for this project)
…By actually
exploiting the apocalyptic pre-eminence of such ideas to propel both the antidote
(& historic fragmentation of power – eg execution of the political
commander leading this process – to consolidate the Revolution/ new global
security architecture – holding the attention of before shooting the fox of the
bombworshippers) AND the transcending overarching vision that holds everything
together:
Aside from everything else, the new rev theory (as it
develops over/ marches across time) needs to be conceptually escalated
to match overt generalised manifestations of USA rapture
psychology - developing vis war with Iran (also to enable all other apocalyptic
threats from all other quarters to be checked)...
Not just by counterposing the idea of common threats/
objectives confronting all humanity, eg for solar powered desalination...
...but to conceptually outgun USA Rapture
psychology, with the idea that in turn stabilises the culture of common
threats/ objectives confronting all humanity...
…With the universalist vision of
intelligent life's mastering of its' own time as the key to mastering the
universe…
(time, consciousness & free will, being one & the
same thing from the opposite standpoints of both the creator
& created – see Chapter 3 Vol V of `Substance Over Form’,
`paradoxes of the Human Soul’ in Lucifer2TM.zip’)
...as (given the sparsity of intelligent life in the
universe) the technologies enabling humanity to make contact with
other worlds - can only be developed once humanity has mastered
itself...
...which means prioritising control of its' own
time to think, above all else - reducing matter/ finance from the
status of master of all humanity, to servant of this conscious
objective....
eg conscious gravity determines a maximum
level of automatic development…
(over 4 Billion years of evolution, from amoeba to the now 10,000 year old war/ finance nexus) before the self destruction mechanism (vis the terminal dialectic of credit expansion descending into military plutocratic rapture psychology) kicks in, preventing darth vaders/ demons etc, ravaging the universe –
…(threatening
terminal collapse into unbridled irredeemable horror) unless
intelligent life gains mastery of itself (eg if we fail, any future
descendants, would as they develop & learn about us, would literally be
driven insane by the knowledge of what we had & pissed away – such that
their own developing knowledge would be their nemesis. All the marbles of 4
Billion years will be decided on the turn of a single card, in the Battle of
Jerusalem)...
(&
this has to be a conscious decision on the part of intelligent
life or else intelligent life would be no more than the slave of an all
controlling celestial Saddam Hussein as opposed to an independant entity/
consciousness - that however needs to tap into its creator/ God/ the supra
reserve of courage, in this ultimate pivotal struggle, to enable it to gain
mastery of itself)
If the sparsity of life in the universe
seems to make interstellar contact/ mastery of the universe by intelligent life
- ultimately becoming God & inflicting the same crap on the next cosmic
generation - impossible...
...there is evidence vis our own planets' history, that
it is not just the automatic incremental development of
intelligent life via the war/ finance nexus - or even its' historically conscious
methadone substitute, the `culture of the common threats/ objectives
confronting all humanity (especially vis solar powered desalination)', that can
bind a land/ people together...
...evidence in the form of the territorial megastate, Russia. Which vis both the tsars
(Christianity, albeit combined with fear of golden hordes) and Russian
Revolution (socialism, albeit defined almost entirely by national security
state fear of western encirclement) could only be held together
as a single state by a giant idea/ vision, wether for good or
bad...
...& which we see ever more now, that without
such a giant idea to bind it together, be inexorably prone to seccession at the
periphery & corresponding repressive action by the center, further
catalysing disintegration; the more tragic for periphery & centre alike...
vis descent into warlordism; catalyzing China’s intervention/ collapse into Russia/ new golden horde sweeping westwards etc
& more, it was only possible to develop this
operationally universalist approach when…
following on from USA aided events in Ukraine (aimed ultimately at Russia’s disintegration)
…the prospect of Russia’s (USA aided) disintegration put
USA rapture psychology (& war/ nuke war with Iran) centre stage – enabling
the Revolution to come up with its’ own conceptual escalation, to
correspondingly outgun it…
If the Indian Ocean tsunami had struck sufficiently long time before said events in Ukraine, then when such occurred, they would have had the geo psycho political impact of relegitimising USA regime in westerners eyes sufficient to enable USA war with Iran
& vis those that think, vis development of a
universalist civilization, that as Johnny come latelys, we have nothing to
contribute, would be remedial no hopers of no interest to any advanced beings
(with a million year or so headstart over us), perhaps profoundest of all for
us all to cling to as we approach our darkest hours, is that those
civilizations that have such a headstart, would know just what we had to
overcome within ourselves & externally, for us to develop the technologies
required to enable us to plug into the universalist network, & however many
times they witness such do so for the first time, it will never ever fail to
move them to the quick of their very souls – for this is what it means to be
truly conscious…
…& if ever they lost the sense of that, they know
their power would evaporate that very instant…
indeed as this (germ of the) new revolutionary theory is ancestrally descended from, & therefore, the last & westernmost outpost of the old Soviet empire…..
fused with British geo politics as the preserver/ restorer of global balance of power….
…not to mention the role of Britain’s welfare state (enabled by the of post WWII USA led geo political economic reforms, forced by the strength of USSR & corresponding fear of revolution) which giros from remnant of said welfare state, bought me the time to begin to come up with the antidote to said threat of our mutual/ global destruction – especially vis USA rapture psychology…
…without which there can be freedom, partial or general, anywhere whatsoever.
…..in this can be found Russia/ FSSRs’ (Federation of Soviet Socialist Republics’ – minus the 3 Baltic republics) salvation, that it need no longer (as well as can no longer) define itself, alone, in terms of (real) barbarian attacks/ threats of encirclement to stabilise its’ periphery….
Eg Chechnya Q can only be resolved through a British led combo of:
1) Changed geo pol/econ reality (vis collapse of USA credit expansionary model)
meaning as USA center/ geo pol/econ model collapses, alternate poles of
attraction find their latent level -
enabled by the British led geo strategic/ constitutional
settlement (as per `Communique Number 1’ – centred on Jerusalem & the
Israel/ Palestine Q), preventing the slide into apocalyptic anarchy.
2) The eclipse of Islamic fascism in mideast (see `Communique Number
1’).
Which provides
ideological/ geo strategic underpinning for chaotic warlordist forces in Chechnya,
which also received a massive boost from Russia razing its’ periphery (as per
the old imperial model) in a losing attempt to keep itself together – under
pressure of its’ own internal weakness; generally (but not exclusively – eg the
increasing inadequacy of the `national security’ cultural narrative as a means
to hold USSR/ Russia together) the product of the USA’s own brittle
(manifestly unsustainable) strength (vis speculative finance propelled
credit expansionism & institutionalized bombworshipping
continuum from even long before Reagan’s `military Keynsianism’ to the Lord’s
anointed himself, Bush jnr). Though as noted, while the USA led military
plutocratic system is perfectly capable of overthrowing itself without any help
from yours truly, to establish a new geo strategic center of gravity/
constitutional settlement (as per `Communique Number 1’) is a much more
complex/ precarious affair.
3) Therefore as the restoration of the FSSR would be undermined by
attempts to force the Chechen issue, the British should not
extradite secular Chechen figures – who are needed to negotiate re-integration/
end to the war, to enable the idea of FSSR (aided by British
orchestrated changed geo strategic realities – see `Communique Number 1’) to
hold together in the context of British led Jerusalem centred geo pol/econ
constitutional reconfiguration (see Communique Number 1). This caveat does not
apply to the plundering Mafiosi…
Eg the only alternative is USA bombworshipper led & completely MAD.
…..but can join, as must rest of
humanity, in embracing a universalist vision/ frontier – that be required to
both stabilize & ultimately eclipse, the transitional culture
of the common threats/ objectives confronting all humanity (especially vis
solar powered desalination).
As regards the Q who/ what
created the first creator? We can thus far deduce that there be an
inbuilt program preventing intelligent life from learning anything until it be
ready to at least begin to deal with the consequences of that knowledge
(eg if cavemen had nukes, everything would be destroyed over & over again
before humanity would have the chance to progress far enough to exploit its own
fear of nukes to overcome the era of the war/ finance nexus, to master its’ own
creation, to master itself)…
…& that therefore, we
will similarly only be able to answer this Q when we are ready to
begin to deal with the consequences of this knowledge…
…for such be our salvation, individually, collectively
& universally…
& yet, in conclusion, USA apocalyptic expansionism
(contained via geo strategic framework outlined in `Communique Number 1’ in
`Lucifer2TM.zip’) can only be finally defeated by USA visionary
expansionism (eg most obviously, against this extreme traumatic historical
& cultural backdrop, search for earthlike planets as well as solar
powered desalination). & it is in this peculiarly (British) American
characteristic of this project, that humanity attains full mastery it’s own
destiny…
In conclusion, if intelligent life must become God, does
this not imply a creator???
& in what way does intelligent life taking control of
its’ own time to gain control of universal time/ universe (& becoming God)
actually demonstrate existence/ role of a supreme being???
It is that because (as we have seen) to
prevent our self destruction such a gigantic conscious (& therefore free
will based) objective, eg intelligent life (gaining mastery of its own time to
gain mastery of universal time the universe &) becoming God, is required;
& that it is only enabled/ propelled by such apocalyptic threats (descent
into chaos & hegemony of matter over consciousness – requiring
such a conscious leap on pain of oblivion), that free will
becomes a decisive historic factor enabling such a
conscious leap
…which itself (because such a conscious
leap could not come about via stable linear development) self evidently
requires a transcendent connexion (with our creator), humanity simply drawing
on a (the) supra reserve of courage, to enable such a conscious
leap…
& that this duel imperative proves both the existence
& role of a creator God (the self evident duel necessity of our needing to
gain mastery of our own time to gain mastery of universal time, the universe
& become God to avoid oblivion) & the need for a transcendent connexion
with our creator to enable us to make the conscious leap; proving
the existence of a creator God.
The Qs raised by this…
(especially
vis how the written secular constitution enabling humanity to master its’ own time
is both imperative to understand AND distinct from the unwritten cosmic
constitution – vis how both Time Consciousness & Free Will Are one &
the same from BOTH the standpoints of the creator & the created)
…are dealt with in more detail in `Paradoxes of the Human Soul’,
& attempt to begin to deal with the Q of the origins of the first God/
cosmic generation, is made in Chapter 7 `The Edge of Beyond’…
The
centre of gravity of this project is (solar powered desalination based)
decentralist development) of Africa….
Based on the basic social econ unit as a freestanding unit – access to energy, water & info giving it strategic depth, consequently also able to pool sovereignty & therefore see of all security threats from predatory warlords/ magnates that have no mandate from the pooled sovereignty of wider humanity
Precisely it be only via such that especially impenetrable Africa could be in any way (however destructively) be opened up – as only such had the levers (of war/ finance) to do so – the sheer impenetrable vastness of Africa in particular overwhelming humanity’s attempts to master the territory. territory.
Hence any attempt to copy the conventional model of development must fail – even any significant wealth generation develops such internal migration across wide & porous borders (increasingly a problem for the west – ironically prior to its geo pol/econ crash) as to overwhelm same.
Unless, development based much more (though not exclusively) on the freestanding social econ unit (energy/ water/ info), so that there is both not principally any boomtown locale to flood into, AND people know they will be made use of/ be able to develop.
Thus the
balance of power will come to lie not in New York, London or even
Jerusalem. But in the hands of the sovereign individual.
…as both our global insurance policy
Against the threat of mini ice age – vis flooding of gulf stream warm water currents with glacial freshwater turning them off.
& as a model which the whole world must adopt as a
framework of development (eg India’s jugular the glacial River Ganges
threatened with extinction – therefore solar powered desalination necessary as
both a fallback and to enable development without destroying
the Ganges – similar for China with its insane policy (as at 27/7/05) to build
600 new coal fired powerstations & Europe/ USA itself.
Decentralist
development will also cut across the dialectic of resource imperialism
…which so distorts geo
pol/econ development that it fuels a migratory tide to the metropolitan core,
further
causing same to choke to death on its own crap – hence London/ Britain (aside
from the aforementioned collapsed of the speculative finance based credit
expansionary regime) especially cannot any more develop itself without this
being highly counterproductive in encouraging mass immigration (fuelling house
price inflation especially via the buy to let market, meaning
With economic distortions as a result of (elaborate)
people cannot afford to do essential work because of
housing costs, fuelling demand for cheap migrants, increasing house prices
& so on & so forth – as well as consequant credit expansion/ the coming
crash – never mind everyone living in smaller & smaller housing units).
Only by gearing up the
entire global pol/econ framework (with WARTIME econ sacrifices to
do so) to so enable 3rd world decentralist development can we halt
this mutually self destructive dialectic.
Decentralist
development in enabling pooled substantive sovereignty of the individual to
check the power of the war/ finance nexus, first halts the squeeze/ loss of
space, then actually increases it – including via a fall in the birth rate by
insuring access to info/ education for women – raising living standards; the
only way to accomplish such.
Thus
by enabling hitherto impenetrable planet Africa to be colonized by the Africans
& the world to be developed increasingly less via logic of the war/ finance
nexus &more on decentralist development, we forge also the developmental
techniques and above all, the mindset of a truly space faring civilization –
which by definition can only be begin or fail on our own home world, not
by inflicting our apocalyptic neuroses on the rest of the universe.
2 Nuclear
Shotgun Wedding
There is however, an
inescapable paradox at the heart of my work.
In that I self evidently lack either
the means to launch such a process by myself…
(that is, to
be permitted to do so by the historical requirements
of the situation – making it at least theoretically possible to do so –
quickly/ effectively enough to a decisive cadre),
…or a pre-existing political army/ formation able to seize
the initiative (which is similarly not possible until geo pol/econ conditions
permit a stable synthesis of organization/action with theory).
& my old plan (from previous
theoretical paradigm `Lucifer2.zip’).....
To sit on my arse, wait for the trial of Saddam Hussein (& corresponding global legitimacy crisis) to launch my work…
(matched to said legitimacy crisis – see `Apocalyptic Triangulation of
the USA Empire & the Omega Option’ in `Lucifer2TM.zip’ from the old
`Lucifer2.zip’)
…at the universities, wait for personnel in such to converge on me (over an extended timeframe) when geo pol/econ conditions ripen - whence I would have new paradigm developed/ deployable - aided by such a readymade infrastructure giving me global reach...
... is increasingly eclipsed by the fact that opportunity
to deploy a viable theory increasingly tends to only come with the point of
total breakdown itself.
So that there is no time for me by myself
to deploy theory/ set up such a process of self assembling infrastructure, that
springs to life as geo pol/econ conditions ripen.
Therefore (vis Iran war/ USA
Rapture psychology) this 2nd Manhattan project can no longer
function as a one man band, as it needs centralized (as opposed
to defuse/ guerillaist) infrastructure/ systems/ networks, to enable me to
continue to develop theory right down to the wire, before launching it – when
the chaos is right on top of us - & everyone is ready for the antidote to
such, at any price…
Which is why finally, having eliminated the
impossible, the last option that remains is to work with elements of the
establishment on basis of the core paradox…
.....that the (USA led)
military plutocratic elite depend on the Revolution to seize power (from the
war/ finance nexus/ machine they are the gilded slaves of), to save their
(everyone's) children: & that the Revolution (to avoid global annihilation)
is dependant on this factor & must tailor it's entire military pol/econ
framework accordingly...
The pivotal strategic
objective is to capture universities as focal points for establishment of
provisional govt (when geo pol/econ meltdown transpires) able to martial the
broadest swathes/ loyalty/ reluctant grudging support of civil society...
We examine how a
British led Israel/ Palestine (Jerusalem centred) settlement serves as the
means for re-engineering the entire geo strategic agenda (& with it the
entire global constitutional political economic framework) in `Communique
Number 1’ – which needs further development especially in the light of
`Conceptually Outgunning USA Rapture Psychology’).
So,
more important than `Revolution from Below' (the regime centre will collapse
anyway - Revolution's key initial task, is to insure there is a cadre with the
vision/ able to hold new order together) is Revolution `from the middle' (the
nodal networks - universities) & also critically `Revolution from Above' -
(via the spread of new rev technology, eg by peoples of all classes terrified
of impending apocalyptic breakdown)
...fusing with `Revolution
from the middle' & when the storm breaks, from below in managed/ controlled
fashion; in the context of (& to resolve) unfolding geo pol/econ chaos...
For we are stuck between 2
iron laws, `we are where we are' & `we need to be where we need to be'.
& (as history has decreed that we deserve each other) we are all stuck with
each other for company, as we try to carve out the path from the one to the
other...
So while it is neccessary to
bring a sufficient minimum to trial of the (British) military plutocratic
elite…
To demonstrate our
burning bridges with the old way of doing things (to lesser breeds without the
law)…
&
that we see our security/ future as being entirely dependant upon the
establishment/ consolidation of a geo strategic/ security framework & in
turn a single global constitutional geo pol/econ framework/ settlement –
gaurenteeing every people’s legitimate security concerns.
…without which we will not
be able to hold the center (eg vis Israel/ Palestine to begin process of
developing said geo security framework – see `Communique Number 1’; or even at
home) in the interim – to enable such to be established.
…excluding
the British Army (but not the Crown) from this process (as needed vis Israel/
Palestine etc…)…
…the capital political
responsibility for whose action is shared by BOTH
the Crown/ senior reps (eg political & institutional figureheads of state
itself, eg MI5/6 & against backdrop of econ chaos, some of the high &
dry speculators – whose interest determined the geo pol/econ agenda) & AND the revolutionary
political figurehead orchestrating this process,
beginning in London – moving as rapidly as possible
to Jerusalem which must at all times be the psycho political focus of the
process see `Communique Number 1’ for details of said process – in need of
modification in light of `Battle of Jerusalem - Conceptually Outgunning USA
Rapture Psychology’ etc
Eg this less & less appears
as a conventional trial or (such as I originally envisaged several years ago)
even a conventional political trial, at all…
…& more about,
illustrating to the whole world how/ why we all find ourselves embroiled in
this process vis the climactic end of 10,000 years of the war/ finance nexus
(itself the climax of 4 billion years of primordial Earth evolution), in which
humanity must finally (confronted by apocalyptic threats of its own making gain
conscious mastery of its’ own creation/ collective destiny or perish; & how
by all accepting our responsibility, we can use said apocalyptic
breakdown of the war/ finance nexus to propel new global security/
consitutional/ pol/econ frameworks/ settlement enabling us to
finally gain mastery of our collective destiny as outlined in `Battle of
Jerusalem - Conceptually Outgunning USA Rapture Psychology & `Communique
Number 1’.
Eg Free will only becomes a hegemonic factor once all potential for automatic development on basis of the 10,000 year old war/ finance nexus is exhausted.
Until then, we could (within limits) chose what role we played, but not the rules of the game…
…for only the final exhaustion of all potential for development on basis of (war finance nexus eg)hegemony of matter over (human) consciousness makes free will a decisive hegemonic factor ..
Eg to use the apocalyptic threats to propel the geo cultural/ constitutional/ pol/econ antidote to said threats…
…to establish law, the primacy of civil society consciousness over its’ own creation…
Q How does this differ from a normal trial?
Because it is not just about a particular criminal act committed in a given time & place by a given individual/ group…
But about humanity facing up collectively to the collective problems derivative from its’ entire evolution/ development – across 4 billion years of evolution, the struggle of consciousness to emerge/ gain primacy over the dust/ matter from which it emerged.
That the first great machine it ever created/ that propelled its development (the 10,000 year old war/ finance nexus) enslaved it…
That in the final epoch of war/ finance nexus, we are all holding weapons of mass destruction of countless different forms eg: nuke/ bio chemical, environmental, ideological, trade & geo political, parochial/ ignorance, indifference etc.
…that threaten wholesale oblivion…
…& that while as a first step, executing some gilded slaves of the war/ finance nexus, is necessary to confirm our intentions/ the mere beginnings of a directional shift to the world & to ourselves, it is not by any means the most difficult task on the long road to global salvation that confronts us (in dismantling all said weapons of mass destruction in all their forms)...
…that it should be understood as a necessary but strictly delimited first step in the general perspective of the tasks that confront collective humanity & absolutely nothing more…
This is why the trial of the military plutocratic elite is merely the first of 3 great inter linked trials; eg of military plutocratic elite/ hegemony, secondly of myself (as outlined in the section: `The Battler of Jerusalem’) to set the geo security agenda in which the 3rd great trial `The Battle of Jerusalem’, eg of all humanity itself, is challenged to pro actively embrace (take ownership of) what it will take to seize control of its own conscious destiny – on pain of oblivion if it does not…
Vis the crown, the dreadful inescapable conclusion
be that the method of execution must match the measures deployed by the British
army against Palestinians trying to breech the Israeli border.
…(with all the kit Thatcher & co sold Saudi in the interests of national security – alerting Israeli missile command)
….or the last settlment before
gaurentees given by Pakistan about dismantling nukes (as outlined in the
section: `The Battle of Jerusalem’)…
…which would set in train a terminal unrestrained psycho political momentum to go all the way & drive Israel into the sea. Certainly such would not have been & needs to be cauterized as part of the process – by Pakistan nuke disarmament demorilising Islamic fascist psychology.
…so that such will not precipitate
general war/ total collapse, but rather be channeled into the incipient
constitutional/ legal framework/ process (outlined in section: `The
Battle of Jerusalem’) of security trade offs, forced through under
threat of MAD/ global apocalyptic anarchy…
Eg to lengthen the psycho political fuses of the hostile parties in
Israel/ Palestine (& the region/ world generally); to enable this, the
political commander of the British army in Israel/ Palestine is personally
stuck with the task of carrying out this murder of part of every one of 60
million British people, even of all humanity.
Eg if such is not
done, then Palestinians/ Arabs will certainly accept British role in overseeing
establishment of a Palestinian state, but without the geo strategic
caveats required to prevent geo psycho political momentum developing a terminal
velocity, such that any attempt to stop such will result in oil being
turned of & general war, as oppose to the trials & corresponding global
security exchange that must be set up vis the global psycho political Battle of
Jerusalem decisively eclipsing the role of the military as a hegemonic factor –
exploiting the threat of MAD to engineer single global security/ constitutional
framework – held together by the very threat of apocalyptic anarchy….
Bearing in mind the army
traditionally needs a stable fixed point to owe allegiance to (a crown or an
established constitution) to avoid anarchy, to what does the army owe
allegiance to in a world of flux???
`Recognising that it is self
evident that all human survival is contingent upon the establishment of a
common framework of global security, serving as the foundation of a single
global constitutional settlement & legal framework, protecting all &
holding all accountable – that the alternative is oblivion,
we pledge our loyalty to the provisional
govt in the establishment of a common global security framework – centred at
Jerusalem’
Eg key point, in the interim,
Britain can only avoid anarchy/ hold together transitionally if defined
by objective of global security framework centred on Jerusalem
Eg it is the very lack
of a viable British constitutional settlement that impels such a Jerusalem
centred framework – to prevent anarchy…
Even Europe (into which Euro Commonwealth
of the regions of Europe, Britain must dissolve itself) can only avoid the
various brushfires springing up turning into raging firestorms which will
consume it utterly, if it is redefined as the backbone of the Global
Commonwealth Confederation – enabling (middle eastern) Medina commonwealth/
South Asia to act (as outlined in `Battle of Jerusalem’) as
checks against USA rapture psychology – eclipsing USA apocalyptic expansionism
in order that USA visionary expansionism can save the world vis solar powered
desalination & the universalist conception…
…Eg the nation state is too
small to tame global finance hegemony (of war/ finance nexus); & too big to
be a peaceful region; therefore unless redefined for such purposes, to enable
transition to geo constitutional blocks able to act as bulwark components
(establishing balance of power) against the power of both global finance
hegemony & any individual leviathan deluding itself that it can dominate
the world/ sleepwalking into some variant of apocalyptic rapture psychology,
inexorably prone to hegemonic manipulation by same & anarchy/ collapse (as
well as, in order to keep the geo pol/econ agenda centred on global
reconstruction, especially solar powered desalination)…
In slightly modified form William
Blake’s `Jerusalem’ also serving as the emergent global anthem (words to the
effect of: `throughout our planets’ green & pleasant land…’)
Helping to fix geo psycho
political focus on Jerusalem/ Battle of Jerusalem…
This way, we shift the focus
away from (no longer viable) static fixed points (in people’s minds) to (as is
necessary in state of apocalyptic flux) a gyrostabilised vision –
propelled by the apocalyptic chaos, & centred on its only
viable geo strategic point of consolidation, Jerusalem.
Said anthem (Jerusalem) can also
function as a key (even decisive) weapon at the aforementioned Battle of
Jerusalem – giving everyone a button to cancel out the nuclear buttons, by
registering support for the alternatives – though the words will only recover
their sweetness at the point when the Battle of Jerusalem takes root in
everyone’s soul…
…in conclusion, it is this point
on the edge of humanity, when the old order cannot hold the center, & the
new has yet to establish its’ global legitimacy; & be so unimagineably
hated for doing what needs must in order to enable it to begin to do so, that
is the most perilous of all in human history. For it represents the gravest
threat of a tip into outright inhumanity/ oblivion on the one hand; against the
absolute certainty of doing so if we refuse the leap.
we
should all of us recognise that:
... in the terrifying paradox of transition, whereby the old ways continue as they collapse, & yet also be changed & also be seized by a paralysis/ duel fear of apocalyptic anarchy; resulting from consequences of their own military plutocratic geo pol/econ policy & fear of revolutionary measures (the good, the bad & the ugly) from above or (even more from) below…
1) Regime needs the Revolution (as per the core paradox) to avoid immediate
& total anarchy….
2) The Revolution needs remnants of the establishment to prevent collapse for
just long enough to allow the Revolutions’ geo strategic solution/ settlement
to kick in – led by (aforementioned) Jerusalem centred
global security framework (setting the terms for the global constitutional/
pol/econ agenda)...
3) It is only the provisional legitimacy of the emergent rev geo
strategic framework (centred on Jerusalem – see `Communique Number 1’ – which
needs further development in light of `Battle of Jerusalem - Conceptually
Outgunning USA Rapture Psychology’) providing a gyro stabilized/ global psycho
political focus & corresponding prospect of global security/
constitutional/ pol/econ settlement - that props up remnants of the establishment
for just long enough to allow them to function as transitional scaffolding for
the revolution in the interim (pre settlement) period.
4) Therefore keep bloodshed
to the absolute minimum necessary, to go just about far enough to demonstrate to
3rd world we have committed ourselves irrevocably to
this process, to enable us to enforce the Jerusalem (Israeli –
Palestine) centred geo strategic process in the way/ degree (we must assume be)
required to avoid a collapse into anarchy, without immediately
precipitating said anarchy (as outlined in `Battle of Jerusalem…’ &
in more detail in `Communique Number 1 in `Lucifer2TM.zip’).
So it is in this spirit of
painful co-operation that I commend `Lucifer2TM.zip' to you now; & ask your
help in spreading said theory & the countless other ways required....
....As there is also obviously a problem, in that I need
to concentrate on further development of said theory, rather than pitch a
static model, I cannot emphasise too strongly the transitional character
of `Lucifer2TM.zip'
Correspondingly I still
retain a slightly modified cyber guerillaist capacity (as per subsection `The
Revolution in Kit Form’ – in `readmefirst05.html’); eg most of the vectors
of propagation from `Lucifer2.zip’ match to unchanged works, awaiting further
development – especially vis when geo pol/econ conditions ripen
....Where changes have been
made, they are marked accordingly in `Political Nuclear Physics'
Eg
as it is dangerous to get too far ahead of time, as time has the
vicious character of springing back ahead of you in general proportion to your
previous advantage, I am anxious to be as closely matched to the point of geo
pol/econ breakdown as can be, so that my work is just about good enough to
serve as a viable starting point from which to proceed...
...Therefore it is important
not to panic, but to remain in formation as such, to match the key moment, or
else be strung out over the march across time...
If one charges too far
ahead of time, the inevitable unripeness of what will consequantly be your lead
concepts shall permeate the entire structure of your work, you shall develop a
corresponding complacency vis ideas you think you be the master of, which means
in the interim you are not properly (instinctively & intellectually)
attuned to the neccessity of their further development; & therefore fall
behind - strung out over the march across time.
Eg
before/ initially, the rev theory's evolution was geared to working classes,
thence (post Sept 11th), increasingly to the nodal elements in the middle
classes, now impelled by (threat of historical electrocution &) USA rapture
psychology, we are forced to step up another gear...
(accounting for how/ why we
instinctively refused to over commit to any of our previous models, until sure
that history had itself, committed itself decisively)
...to unleash the Philosophical
Revolution (vis conceptually outgunning USA rapture psychology), as
the initial vector - a cavalry charge (deployable now that
history has decisively committed itself) to be followed up by (global mobilisation of) mass
(political) infantry support (to claim the field/ & ever increasingly, to
hold the centre) - when geo pol/econ breakdown occurs...
It is only now (having
developed the appropriate political technology to match such threats) that I
can bring myself to accept that only when USA bombworshippers march under their
own banner
..as a result of the
fact that USA militarists, uniquely among such in history (unique to the extent
this is the case) don't actually want (themselves) to do any fighting,
therefore the only remaining logic is to press the button & hope our Lord
& Saviour will come riding to glory on a mushroom cloud -
...precipitating
America's fear of America, humanity will be sufficiently terrified to
adopt & develop further, my counter measures.
Looking back, there is no way
in 1987 or even relatively recently, I could have reconciled myself to such a
notion, without becoming (defacto) one of those that advocate
everything must crash (for all practical purposes, irretrievably) into the
abyss for some miraculous resurrection/ transubstantiation to occur - without bothering to develop any
corresponding counter measures.
USA bombworshippers
aside, I reckoned circa 1987 (when I became a professional revolutionary -
& even before) Revolution to absolute imperative, because even in event of
a new period of longwave rev reform/ reconfiguration of the capitalist system,
humanity would not survive the resultant proliferation of inherently
apocalyptic technologies, on basis of military plutocratic elite hegemony – eg
without civil society hegemony/ control over how such technologies are
developed/ deployed & to what purpose.
So
paradoxically (on the other side of the equation), without trying
all this time to steal a march on history…
You can always tell
when you are really desperate, when you are forced to ask the Q `If hope
existed, what would it look like & where would it be?’, & plot a course
to intercept it accordingly.
Well, never have I used this
dead reckoning device with greater frequency than in compiling this pamphlet/
transitional paradigm.
This fact & that it holds
together at all, leads me to the conclusion that, it is the future, but
definitely not the present.
`I have seen the future
& its’ a damn near run thing’
…I could never have kept pace
with it. Therefore such, a voyage across the universe of one's own ignorance,
was neccessary, to develop further the new political technology, to get to each
staging post just in time, to remain in the game, to struggle to get to the
next objective.
Eg if I had not
developed (as outlined in `Intro to Quantum Materialism’ Chapter 6
subsection `Here’s one I made earlier’) a subscenario to deal with the BNP
Q (a couple of months) before September 11th (to combine with
scenarios related to asymmetric warfare) I could not have
developed subsequant paradigms; history would have run too far ahead of me to
be able to catch up, to produce the outline gameplan which (when conditions
ripen - via America's fear of America) the rest of humanity can/
must develop further in every way required, in action, in theory, wherever they
are, however they can.
(etc, until my death -
hopefully effectively deployed - consolidates new rev culture &
corresponding global constitutional/ legal framework)
Each new objective more
starkly forbidding than that which preceeded it...
Likewise for all humanity in
the future (Keeping its' correspondingly exponentially increased knowledge/
imagination continuously occuppied in a kind of `intellectual Big Bang').
3 The Jihad For the
Global Constitution
Central to the culture of the common threats/ objectives confronting all humanity…
Including vis threat of a mini ice age – vis flooding of gulf stream warm water currents with glacial freshwater turning them off…
…necessitating development of Africa as our global insurance policy, in turn dependant on solar powered decentralist development
Based on the basic social econ
unit as a freestanding unit – access to energy, water & info giving it
strategic depth, consequently also able to pool sovereignty & therefore see
of all security threats from predatory warlords/ magnates that have no mandate
from the pooled sovereignty of wider humanity
Precisely it be only via
such that especially impenetrable Africa could be in any way (however
destructively) be opened up – as only such had the levers (of war/ finance) to
do so – the sheer impenetrable vastness of Africa in particular overwhelming
humanity’s attempts to master the territory. territory.
Hence any attempt to copy the
conventional model of development must fail – even any
significant wealth generation develops such internal migration across wide
& porous borders (increasingly a problem for the west – ironically prior to
its geo pol/econ crash) as to overwhelm same.
Unless, development based much
more (though not exclusively) on the freestanding social econ unit (energy/
water/ info), so that there is both not principally any boomtown
locale to flood into, AND people know they will be made use of/
be able to develop.
Thus the balance of power will come to lie not in New York, London or even Jerusalem. But in the hands of the sovereign individual.
& as a model which the whole world must adopt as a framework of development (eg India’s jugular the glacial River Ganges threatened with extinction – therefore solar powered desalination necessary as both a fallback and to enable development without destroying the Ganges – similar for China with its insane policy (as at 27/7/05) to build 600 new coal fired powerstations & Europe/ USA itself.
Thus by enabling hitherto impenetrable planet Africa to be colonized by the Africans & the world to be developed increasingly less via logic of the war/ finance nexus &more on decentralist development, we forge also the developmental techniques and above all, the mindset of a truly space faring civilization – which by definition can only be begin or fail on our own home world, not by inflicting our apocalyptic neuroses on the rest of the universe.
…Is the universalist conception, which in practical terms
is about insuring for all humanity a progressive mastery over its own time, to
enable education/ accummalation of knowledge – driven by the overarching
culture of the common threats/ objectives confronting all humanity (bridling
egos elaborate)…
this in turn means the permanent constitutional bridling of finance to serve (regional/ superstate/ global) civil society (instead of global civil society being under the hegemonic imperium of the war/ finance nexus), through a new constitutional division of power…
...through elected Workers Pension Councils - a
permanent bulwark against destructive finance speculation & freeing parliaments from plutocratic
hegemony; & setting the global investment agenda within parliaments
(redistributive/ social wage geared) tax regime - a constitutional division of
power between the twin pillars of state -
(establishing a rev global
framework for reconstruction consisting of free access to markets/ freeflow of
capital between G.C.C. member states - eg sharing the same rev constitutional
framework, the emergent Common
Ownership of Information.....
the progressive liquidation of all
copyright/ corp control of info which requires a military plutocratic national
security state to guard it, including full disclosure of nat
sec state info itself beginning with the pr-requisite for the global security
architecture (vis ALL nuclear info),
enabling dismantling of all nukes except those under global control by the
Global Commonwealth confederation troops in the USA (eg to systematically
reduce the Cumbre Veja Volcano after it has been drained of the water in its
volcanic dykes & lance the Yellowstone Caldera); Eg as the increasing power
to create inevitably brings with it the increasing power to destroy, the key thing is that all such technologies
should be placed under the control of global civil society for the agreed
purposes agreed by global civil society…
- to enable us to forge/
consolidate a working operational connexion with global/ 3rd world civil
society,
eg the military plutocratic
system has crashed. And the remnant can only be propped up by the revolution
for just long enough for it to serve as a brace to enable the stable
construction of the Revolution settlement – as per the necessity of extending
the nuclear shotgun wedding between the old order & the revolution
worldwide
.......&
additional seedcorn aid via a redistributive formula/ mechanism within the
G.C.C. - WARTIME sacrifices for global reconstruction specifically solar powered desalination shall be endured
with whatever reluctance as to refuse
such would lead to re-emergence of a military plutocratic nat sec state by
default to keep the 3rd world down, eclipsing the common ownership of info
impelling a new Revolution).
(As we shall see) These defining objectives including the
culture of the universalist conception are absolutely imperative, in enabling
humanity to (just about) hold itself together (in the extreme turmoil following
the aforementioned crash of the military plutocratic system) at ALL stages of
the revolutionary transition before & after the Battle of Jerusalem…
Including in developing/ extending the nuclear shotgun
wedding globally in order to (aid development of global security architecture
&) stabilise the emergent common ownership of information – in a context in
which the old structures will have collapsed/ be in freefall to the
extent that secrecy of any kind (if not to be simply displaced/ replaced by
unbelievably savage warlordisms) will have to justify its role, if it is to
function as a transitional aid to order…
…eg specifically as a lever to enable new global security
architecture to be established enabling solar powered desalination (eg solar
powered desalination enabling substantive sovereignty of the individual thus stabilising common ownership of info = Socialism).
As will become clearer in the history section(s), we are
all responsible for this nightmare & even for closing down the options
others had leading to criminal choices/ logic. But the scale & demands of
the objective of enabling humanity to gain mastery over its own time, &
through this universal time, so dwarfs the old hatreds that it is precisely by
depoying every nerve & fibre of our being to this collective survival
logic, that humanity can just about make it through to the broad sunlit
uplands…
Britain (barely) stabilised by Jerusalem centred focus, & threatened by Europe’s bushfires, must spread the nuclear shotgun wedding to Europe via the Battle of Berlin…
Which in spreading the nuclear shotgun wedding by
combining the strategic repression of resurgent classical fascists…
Eg due to
residual fear of Germany & Germany’s fear of Germany, the British must so
prepare a Germanic led European people for their destiny
…with the re-orientation of Europe to Jerusalem, the forging of the global security architecture & Europe’s role in leading the constitutional consolidation of such – which however, while battle of Berlin can/ must temporarily stabilise Europe for just long enough to prevent descent into anarchy until the battle of Jerusalem, it is only the global conscious context of the latter that enables Europe to so redefine itself
& by definition if Britain must lead this process, ULSTER must lead it…
As (since Sept 11th, Iraq war,
increasingly unsustainable immigration flows into mainland
Britain) the mainland classical fascist psychology/ focus is now so absorbed by
mainland ethnic minorities; it is increasingly inconceivable in the context of
the geo pol/econ crash that Republicans be increasingly smashed (vis collapse
of the peace boom & assertion of the right to commit genocide within our
own borders) & then the classical fascists shift focus towards ethnic
minorities.
Rather the latter so absorb the
classical fascist focus, that Loyalists stuck on their own without any state
support & driven out (& onto the mainland to re-inforce the onslaught
against the ethnic minorities) by the Irish Army. This is of course excessively
optimistic as geo pol/econ collapse/ primal panic will have led to social
liquification before such stately ambitions can be realised…
Pre Sept 11th I
had been geared up to the idea that the global speculative finance/ credit
expansion propelled USA budget/ trade deficit would lead to dollar collapse/
soaring interest rates/ global credit crunch/ hyperinflation & geo pol/econ
tailspin collapsing the Ulster peaceboom leading to war gathering its own
momentum, spilling over onto the mainland & merging with Tory anti EU
political warlordism (the right to commit genocide within our own borders) –
the need to combat such via paramilitary attacks on classical fascist
formations (military & political), & take the attack to the enemy via a
rev pol campaign held together as a continuous process by antifascist hunger
strikers (as focal point of the campaign – enabling the delegitimisation of the
regime/ continuous martialing of forces) – re-inforced by parliamentary wing in
event of elections being called to relegitimise the regime/ fraction of such.
As this would only work on a
European scale, to establish a Euro Commonwealth of the regions eclipsing the
nation state (too weak to establish civil society hegemony over global finance
– yet too big to be a peaceful region) & defined for a Global Commonwealth
Confederation to contain the threat from USA caesarism etc in turn defined for
the Green Revolution (wartime sacrifices for solar powered desalination to
quench the thirst for revenge from the 3rd world/ stabilise the immigration Q
by aiding development of 3rd world), this necessitated the export of the
methodology by British antifascists via Battle of Berlin to fix the centre of
gravity of Euro Commonwealth be breaking the threat where most feared in Europe
(paradoxically as Germany afraid Germany, it would only be the British
awakening the Germanic regions to their historic role as backbone of Euro
Commonwealth, leading Europe, leading the world, which would psycho politically
enable them to so take the initiative; & which gyro stabilising vision
would enable unification of Ireland within a Euro Commonwealth, providing a new
covenant of security for Loyalists replacing the old collapsed nation state based
based security construct).
I had (pre Sept 11th 2001)
partially developed/ regeared to a subscenario whereby anticipated explosive
growth of BNP in April 2002 local elections necessitated a containing/
pre-emptive strike in case of major electoral breakthrough (otherwise the
combination of a major advance combined with economic tailspin would have
threatened a (psycho) military political rout; if not contained be a position
prepared before the geo pol/econ crash.
Since Sept 11th ,
the changed psycho political focus decisively shifting attention away from USA
budget/ trade deficit (finance scandals/ crises feeding of themselves &
merging into a single firestorm catalysing meltdown), the Ulster Q became a
backwater, & the new conditions did not permit the BNP to raise the stake
required to play the ultimate game -
establishing a paradoxical period of apocalyptic stability.
A parochialism that is paradoxically best positioned & motivated to eclipse parochialism, & knows best (especially Billy Hutchinson) how to put out the brushfires…
& by the very concerns raised about its leadership, insure the seperation of powers maintained strictly by everyone else…
…so that the armed power of the state consequently kept to a minumum,
The fusion/ expression of Europe’s global constitutional
leadership, consolidating the new global security architecture via its global
institutional commitment to solar powered desalination/ decentralist
development; is European Commonwealth intervention in South Africa after the
Battle of Jerusalem…
The commitment of
European peacekeeping forces preventing genocidal slaughter of the white
minority in South Africa for just long enough to allow the rev settlement to
kick in…
…eg the very fact that Europe seriously risks its blood in so doing, insures that European state forces become an institutional bulwark for pushing said general framework of rev reconstruction, to insure the security/ survival of European troops…
Compelling Europe in turn to adopt the aforementioned constitutional framework of a Commonwealth of the regions of Europe – based on civil society control of finance through elected workers’ pension councils….
(elaborate)
…which is the best gaurentee Africa could ever want that
Europe will forge its entire pol/econ around the objective of
developing solar powered desalination/ decentralist development. So that Africa
can function as Europe/ North’s insurance policy – vis threat of a mini ice age
– galvinising African political psychology around a role that gives it an
increasing sense of purpose as it develops; enabling it to transcend the psycho
political drag factor of its vast interior… with a universalist vision
increasingly cast outwards towards the stars, contact with intelligent life
throughout the universe, to intelligent life becoming God & visiting the
same crap on the next cosmic generation…
Q while
mothers’ movement enables eclipse of paradox of arms, endorses global security architecture,
particularly drive for solar powered desalination, making possible European
commitment in South Africa WHAT (given the backdrop of the Iraq
catastrophe) actually compels it???
It is the CONSCIOUS realisation that
if Europe does not project itself outwards at the critical geo
pol/econ point (to re-inforce the global security architecture with the new
global constitutional agenda/ pol/econ framework to re-inforce the global
culture of the common threats/ objectives confronting all humanity) Europe will
turn inwards & devour itself…
Eg it is Europe’s own extremely
perilous instability that helps propel/ drive this process…
As regards the identification of the key point, as the
flashpoint between black & white & its contentiousness, THIS
is what helps compel Europe to re-inforce its armies with WARTIME
sacrifices for reconstruction specifically solar powered desalination – a
process that must be fought with all the desperate survival logic of an all out
war…
Paradoxically, it is only by committing our armies to
peacekeeping in South Africa…
…thus shifting the entire geo
constitutional pol/econ focus of Europe & with it the world to the geo
pol/econ solution that underpins the security of its troops, solar powered
desalination based for global security…
…that European (ethno national based) fratricidal strife is eclipsed & the spectre of a golden horde from the collapse of the Russia/ China (to say nothing of a vast array of other apocalyptic dynamics) can be addressed by providing geo pol/econ points of support to enable corresponding geo constitutional frameworks (we will now outline) to be established in Russia, USA, Medina Commonwealth, South Asia & China.
As to the Q How is Europe temporarily stabilised before the battle of Jerusalem???
Perhaps the point is it barely can be, & this is what gives the battle of Jerusalem its decisive focus/ power – eg if Europe could be so stabilised, it would imply it could hold together without the battle of Jerusalem at least to the degree that it develops a sufficiently complacent attitude to the Battle of Jerusalem that Europe unquestionably would not be desperate enough to respond to it, it would fail & thence later Europe descends into chaos.
Q But why given the nuclear shotgun wedding, is this necessary???
Actually, it is the decisive expression of the nuclear shotgun wedding. The old state cannot hold together & the new state (vis both Battle of Jerusalem & the revolution settlement that has not yet kicked in) cannot yet hold the centre…
It corresponds/ is integral to the revolutionary calculus of force, that force cannot be used to conquer, only to prevent hostile peoples from killing each other for just long enough to allow the rev settlement to kick in…
…again it is only the focus on Jerusalem that makes this at all viable…
& this changed geo cultural constitutional geo
pol/econ environment (including vis the universalist conception/ culture of the
common threats/ objectives confronting all humanity) is/ can serve as the first
precondition for the salvation of Russia forging a new FSSR.
Currently as at 1/8/05, Putin’s plan to create a normal
capitalist system in Russia by monetising
the remnants of old Soviet welfare state by using funds from taxes of
the oligarchs, thus further aiding development of Russian capitalism through
cheaper labor ….
….will only lead to internal migration to the choicest/
warmer areas – which in turn leads to Putin’s attempt to prevent this (&
corresponding collapse of the state) by internal passport
controls (as in Tsarist/ Soviet era)
& as he lacks a solid political base in either capital or labor (& a
convincing national security narrative based on either interest) & moreover
is reduced to razing the periphery to prevent seccession/ break up of Russia
entirely, his assassination by workers (if Chechens/ oligarchs do not get to
him first) is inevitable – threatening outright collapse of the Russian state
(as Putin’s assassination would weaken the existing centre without any
incipient pol/econ centre from either workers/ oligarchs or a conventional
capitalist class capable of taking its place).
So the Q poses itself how/ what is to hold
Russia together???
In the interim, the fact/ mutual conscious, geo psycho
political realisation that Europe need Russia & Russia needs Europe, to
establish the geo constitutional agenda…
(eg the extreme closing down of historical options/ illusions to these 2 choices: global mutual self destruction or a desperate all out struggle to forge the new global security architecture & constitutional framework held together by the overarching culture of the common threats/ objectives confronting all humanity – beginning with the all out struggle to develop solar powered desalination/ global energy security….)
…& new global security architecture that enables
Russia/ FSSR to survive/ emerge…
& just as Russia previously defined itself for
Christianity & against the Mongol Horde, for the Socialist Revolution &
against western imperialism, this time Russia is no longer alone & will be conscious
of this - Firstly in terms of the role of the global security architecture….
….& secondly in terms of the role of Europe as a geo
political point of support, Russia/ FSSR (minus the nukes, to win the
confidence of its periphery who with the collapse of the USA empire have
nowhere else to go but will all the more then be suspicious of any national
security Russian state construct; & enable FSSR to take its place in a
multi polar world) can reconstitute itself for a global/ universalist vision –
adopting similar constitutional framework enabling over time the substantive
sovereignty of the individual to develop.
This holds the FSSR together by giving the Soviet people
a constitutionally & geo politically underpinned stake in their pol/econ…
Eg the emerging global sovereignty of the individual (as
a global economy based on solar powered desalination – even where this is less
effective in especially cold regions for at least part of the year) & a
global pol/econ constitutional framework to underpin/ entrench (through pooled sovereignty) their collective interests
is imperative; so that they are willing to go/ stay where otherwise they would
not, save their legitimate geo pol/econ security/ interests be properly
institutionalised to gaurentee such…
To forge such a FSSR, it requires a strong
presidentialfigurehead working with the active support of civil society
(particularly the regions etc). Certainly not an oligarch, so by process of
elimination (the workers being so weak) this
points to the army, & a figure like the late General Alexander Lebed
– who unfortunately died in a mysterious helicopter crash.
Enabling FSSR in conjunction with Europe (& the new global security architecture) to:
…Chain up USA apocalyptic expansionism (necessitating
also that the USA army be reduced to guarding its borders - including vis
immigration - & be subject to aforementioned obligations to place its nuke
facilities under global control/ monitoring as per the aforementioned global
security architecture)…
…in order to free up USA visionary expansionism
(adapting similar constitutional framework/ geo cultural imperatives) vis
solar powered desalination…
…enabling USA to play a stabilising role in terms not
only of global energy security, but in helping to orchestrate the new geo
politics necessary to bring it about…
Enabling USA to express its legitimate (heavily modified) security interests in terms pro-actively consistent with those of the rest of humanity;
Panic throughout USA society at all levels is a terrible peril, so it needs someone able to orchestrate the internal cultural & social pol/econ coalition in USA, specifically someone able to unite progressives of all stripes around the idea of global energy security, whilst simultaneously adapting/ pruning not smashing to smithereens the old security architecture towards a transitional stabilising role – someone perhaps like former CIA chief James Wolsey.
The region of the Medina Commonwealth (stabilised in the
run up to the Battle of Jerusalem by being the focus of the whole world in
emerging global security architecture) has little experience of parliamentary/
civil society operation so the transition is not quite so obvious…
But, as well as the fact that it self evidently requires
Jewish administration of Mecca to prevent Sunni/ Shia razing it with
fratricidal strife, it therefore also needs to stabilise the vortices of Mecca/
Medina via aforementioned constitutional vision based on Universalist Conception
– humanity gaining mastery over its own time (to enable humanity to acquire the
knowledge to deal with the common threats/ objectives confronting it –
beginning with solar powered desalination…), to gain control of universal time/
universe etc (become God our cosmic parents & visit the same crap on the
next cosmic generation)…
…Specifically in order to enable the
division between a secular written global (as well as Medina Commonwealth
superstate) constitution & the unwritten universal/ cosmic constitution
that the former is designed to help humanity (acquire the time to) understand…
Thus restoring/ refining the golden core of ancient secular Islamic culture, that to pursue knowledge for causes/ objectives greater than oneself is the measure of oneself, others & all humanity…
…The
Palestinians are geo politically best placed to lead the development of Medina
Commonwealth focussing it on the world, most obvious figurehead being Marwan Barghoutti…
Medina (from Jerusalem) therefore holds & gyrostabilises the focus of the whole world & is in turn held stable by it…
Pakistan/ India temporarily stabilised via the pre Battle
of Jerusalem agenda leading up to the Battle of Jerusalem.
…at a number of different levels. Firstly (vis the oil Q/
agenda – as outlined in Chapter 1), in terms of keeping the USA nukes off
Pakistan…
…the very fact that Pakistan has been given this extended
lifespan, pulls it into the rev geo
pol/ strategic orbit (encourages development of nuclear shotgun wedding);
…which partially cuts the ground from underneath Hindu
fascism; barely sufficiently, to buy enough time & space within Indian
civil society’s mind, for the incipient global security architecture agenda (as
outlined in Chapter 1)/ global constitutional agenda/ conception to
sufficiently begin to take root…
Ultimately South Asia, geo culturally is stabilised by
its role as leading check on USA apocalyptic expansionism (enabling USA global
visionary expansionism), it is in many respects similar to Europe in its otherwise
self evident propensity to fragmentation without such a vision…
The Q that drives development of a similar constitutional
framework in South Asia, in a way similar to that in Europe (to protect its
troops in Africa) is the choice, either:
Be the leading check on USA
(& China), as the emergent transitional power bloc eventually eclipsing
Europe (before Africa takes charge); & develop solar powered desalination
energy generation that saves instead of killing of the River Ganges. Or:
Succumb to fratricidal strife/ disintegration/ annihilation…
The critical thing here is, that like with the FSSR, it
is now changed geo pol (constitutional) context led by Europe (as well as the
new global security architecture), that makes it possible for aforesaid component
constitutional factors impelling such in India; to play into/ orientate itself
towards (aforementioned) global constitutional dynamic.
The crash of USA led military plutocracy brings down brittle
Chinese capitalism, (destroying the authority of the Chinese state in its
present form) which is self evidently therefore, not capable of stabilising
war/ finance nexus…
As the development of the (Indian & Chinese)
megastates (whose size prevents legitimation of imperial ideology) beyond a
certain point, causes their population to see their elites as the main threat,
it is only via civil society hegemony over finance/ substantive sovereignty of
the individual (enabled by solar powered desalination) that such could/ can
ever develop much further without
explosive civil strife.
Therefore China needs global re-inforcement/ security
frameworks to stabilise its development/ with its own citizenry as a globally
connected (rather than an insular) people.
Just as the world correspondingly needs the potential
threat of China, to help its constitutional vision stay anchored beyond the
vortices of its own parochialism…
Eg if we stabilise the rest of the world, we tend to get
China (more or less) for free…
As the collapse/ temporary restabilisation of USA led geo
pol/econ via aforementioned Jerusalem centred agenda, breaks through China’s
insularity.
…causing the Chinese state to be at one & the
same time delegitimised AND potentially radically
modified/ relegitimised by collapse of USA led imperium. If the Chinese state (connecting
with the new global security & constitutional agendas seeks to avoid a
maelstrom far bloodier than anything the Taipeng ever waged &) co-opts
(vis another nuclear shotgun wedding) Chinese civil society in a framework of
global dialogue based on forging the new global security architecture, solar
powered desalination & geo pol/econ constitutional framework – held
together by the universalist conception, of humanity gaining mastery over its
own time (& to deal with common threats/ objectives confronting all
humanity, to gain mastery over universal time/ become God itself)…
In conclusion, while the initial overarching
political agendas of India & China are captured by the aforementioned
forging of the new global security architecture – vis battle of Jerusalem
(mention again the Ganges), it is only by binding Europe into
South Africa committing Europe irrevocably to the Global
Commonwealth confederal framework/ Green Revolution, that we sufficiently
convince Chinese civil society we are serious – such that Chinese civil society
thence becomes a sufficiently constant point of stability…
…to provide in the context of the aforementioned managed
depression/ global switch to (solar powered desalination enabled) decentralist
development, a sufficient check to the process of internal
disintegration to prevent collapse into anarchy…
& it is the dynamic combo of these global & micro
pol/econ imperatives that maintain the (aforementioned) resolution of the
paradox of arms…
…sufficiently to insure that even
(indeed especially) amidst the collapse of the old war/ finance nexus military
(plutocratic) systems, the various regional armed formations checking China’s
tendancy to military expansionism (not to say descent into outright
warlordism), are better able to buy time & space within the minds of
Chinese civil society sufficient to allow the rev antidote to
kick in, than any military plutocratic MAD system causing all to march behind
their own military plutocratic elites towards oblivion…
…indeed through such a dynamic of containment, that as
the policy decision that has consciously to be made by everyone every
day, is to choose between sustainable development or environmental/
expansionist/ warlordist self destruction – it is paradoxically, actually the
(receeding) pre WWI/ cold war type apocalyptic annihilatory tension that serves
to keep everyone sufficiently focussed on the end objective of the Green
revolution & the Universalist Conception – so that the latter can eclipse
the receeding threat…
…even such that sufficient degree of stable cooperation
between the regional blocs can be mounted to check the tribal narco
fundamentalist/ warlordist threat from Afghanistan, both by external containment
& fostering sufficient internal points of support with a
sufficient stake in the future to check/ break said forces of chaos in the
future Edinburgh of Central Asia in a way that can only be done
via solar powered desalination giving access to electricity/ clean water/
information to the women & children of the warlords in their very
strongholds, the last fight of such being therefore, not against USA/ USSR or
China, but with their own families & indeed with themselves…
eg you cannot abolish by presidential or parliamentary
decree, human ego/ venality/ characteristics that have evolved over 4 billion
years of earth evolution, 10 million years of humanity & 10,000 years of
the war/ finance nexus. But you can so trade off & balance each corresponding
threat off against each other, so that such can be bridled by, to serve the
culture of the common threats/ objectives confronting all humanity, so that
ultimately fear itself be ever more eclipsed by the electrifying vision of the
struggle of intelligent life to become god, our cosmic parents & visit the
same crap on the next cosmic generation….
of the USA Empire
This
all begs the Q, HOW the hell did we get into this mess???
Whereby it is only the super apocalyptic threats that
stimulate/ enable/ terrify humanity into gaining mastery over itself???
Central to humanity’s disabling confusion is the idea
that humanity was created in the image of God, which in turn as a corresponding
reaction, gave rise to the delusion of purity of reason…
…both exclude/ are blind to the impurity of logic of a
humanity (riven through top to bottom to its very core with paradox) emerged
over 4 billion years of earth evolution from pondscum with the capacity to
become God…
…& it follows from this, that we be thus far blind to
the historical processes (emanating from this paradox) that have led us to this
point.
WHAT is the foundation of this delusion???
The original oppression of humanity by nature & (with
the eclipse of the natural economy (elaborate) the
corresponding enslavement of humanity before the first really great machine it
ever created, the war/ finance nexus…
…the corresponding subordination of human consciousness
to the hegemony of matter/ finance over civil society…
As to argue with the rationale of those asserting that
humanity’s intellectual faculties must be subordinated to one of the antique
books, alledgedlydivinely inspired by a God that expects humanity to take on
trust the word of one of the said books, but woe betide if you pick the wrong
one – is self evidently self defeating, we shall begin with the contempory failure of classical
rationalism, both capitalist & Marxist…
…either to hold/ re-establish a viable geo pol/econ
centre of gravity on the basis of hegemony of finance over civil society OR to
enable global civil society to establish control over finance enabling humanity
to master itself…
Q. Smart Alecs like you have been prophesying the death of
capitalism since 1848. Even now a dwindling band of flat-earthers quote Marx's
words (circa 1848) about `...the choice facing humanity being capitalism or
barbarism....', without the merest hint of sarcasm. So what conclusive proof
can you offer to serve as capitalism's death certificate?
To understand the evidence, it is necessary to have a
basic understanding of the pathology of the capitalist/ military plutocratic
system & also why Marxism/ laborism has failed.....
The question
hence arises what historically causes capitalist long-wave crisis? And
is a new cyclical long-wave boom likely?
Capital is invested in:
New productive capital
(plant/machinery etc).
Workers' wages (b1), and
social wages(b2), eg. real demand.
Dividends (c1) and
speculation (c2).
Welfare (d1), this is
derived from taxes on (b1) and an expansion of the national debt, the costs
borne predominately by workers, therefore it cannot properly be considered an
additional part of real demand.
And corporate welfare (d2), this includes arms contracts, pension scams,
profit guarantees etc.
Capital is motivated by the pursuit of surplus profits
(above the average rate of profit), causing capital to flow into those sectors
where profits are highest.
Over the expansionary long-wave, the organic composition
of capital (a), its' productivity, rises faster than workers' wages and social
wages (b1,b2), real demand; which rise but not sufficiently to absorb
all the products of (a) over the long-run. This is called over-accumulation
(of capital).
This over-accumulation of capital in a given sector, or
the economy in general, causes market saturation or over-production; as
there isn't' sufficient real demand to absorb all the products. This happens
because the pressure of capital for growth in its' assets or a return on its'
investment (c1), causes over-accumulation - productivity to grow out of
kilter with real demand. This causes the rate of profit to fall
in real industry (over the long-run) below the culturally expected level
(ranging from country to country dependant on the relationship of
class/imperial forces).
When this fall in the rate of profit takes place in a
certain sector or sectors, this causes periodic downturns (in a period of general
upswing), until (with weaker concerns bankrupted etc) the rate of profit
recovers to the average rate of profit.
When this process of over-accumulation and market
saturation becomes generalised throughout the productive economy, capital finds
itself caught between two fires:
Falling real demand (of
workers and social wages absorbing production).
Demands for higher wages
(threatening the rate of profit and over-accumulated capitals' share).
Unless (impossibly unlikely) capitalism were to
voluntarily accept an evolving loss of hegemony (over control of production)
and concedes either an evolving and continuous rise in wages or (preferably) in
social wages, to bring the production/real demand relationship into kilter (for
sustainable, stable and continuous growth), the situation cannot be
(peacefully) resolved.
This crisis leads to a build up of inflationary pressures
- the struggle for surplus value - as capital seeks to pass the costs (of its
profits) on either in higher prices to consumers or trades-union aided `social
contracts', holding wages down threatening investment strikes & lockouts. And
increasingly there is a regressive long-term switch of capital into speculation
(c2), including the expansion of credit (against inflated property prices); and
a growing dependency on military contracts (squeezing real demand still
further) and corporate welfare (d2) - combined with a squeeze on (b1, b2 and
d1).
However as the only source of real wealth is real
industry, these financial/speculative `investments', serve only to further milk
the productive base of industry (and real demand able to absorb production),
with demands for ever higher dividends - effectively treating capital as
(unsustainable) income. Capitalism therefore has an increasing tendancy to
disappear up its' own speculative arsehole (see rise and fall in land/house
prices etc).
It is a myth/lie that interests rates are used to `combat
inflation'. The only way they `work' is by discouraging productive economic
activity. This hammers real demand giving the purely cosmetic statistical
appearance of lower inflation (reduced economic activity).
In fact the raising of interest rates only serves to
increase (proportionately & aggregately) the demands of parasitic finance
(for ultimately higher dividends) on the productive base of the economy,
weakening real demand (eg. increasing exorbitant mortgage/rent rates and
chronic indebtedness - REVEALED NOT CAUSED - when the
speculative/property bubble bursts) institutionalising
inflation (in hidden form, see indebtedness) and increasing susceptibility to
inflationary pressures over the long-term (& ultimately a global credit
crunch leading to global stagflation/ hyperinflation).
Low nominal inflation conceals the impact of
indebtedness and therefore merely illustrates the triumphal victory of capital
over labor's capacity (through traditional means) to resist this
continuous and permanent assault.
The sole function and purpose of raising (real)
interest rates is to restore the position of (especially unproductive finance)
capital over labor in a period of crisis/permanent crisis, and nothing more. To
re-iterate industry cannot/dare not resist, because this would mean
mobilising the masses, who would then in turn force their own more radical
agenda afterwards.
The problem can be summarised simply as:
Capitalism is out of
kilter viz real demand and accumulation
There is no (automatic)
pol/econ mechanism to correct this. Eg. via increased wages and/or social wages
- WPCs preventing capital being/becoming (again) a law unto itself - freeing a
democratic parliament/local govt to play this (redistributive) role.
Such long-term crisis when resolved/resolvable, were done
so through a long-term rise in wages (necessary to provide the basis for
a long-term upswing) after a re-ordering of the productive forces (the
national & global division of labor - in turn) prepared & aided by a
long-term fall (in the previous period of long-term downswing) in wages
(by the reccessionary long-wave) and a decline in productive investment -
raising the (potential) rate of profit after (the implementation of)
revolutionary reform - As a starting point, from which the long-wave
boom then generates its' own momentum, with reforms & rises in wages -
until it eventually collapses due to over-accumulation.
The key examples are:
Post-Chartism &
Revolutions of 1848 - After the
break-up of the hegemony of landed capital (by the abolition of the corn-laws
and the last remnants of feudalism in Europe) foreign trade was expanded and
the (real) domestic purchasing power was driven up by
a) A reduction in the
price of bread, meaning people had more real demand/purchasing power to
purchase industrial products.
b) A raising in the price
of labor (caused by extra industrial activity by foreign trade and a)-), as
demand for labor grew; so did its' ability to bargain/push for higher wages in
turn creating more (real) demand.
Until over-accumulation/market saturation brought the
long-wave expansion to an end in the early-mid 1870's - beginning a long-wave
downturn.
Gladstone/ Asquith (continental Europe had similar variants) - With a
new rise in radical politics & militant trades-unionism, threatening to
assume revolutionary-political characteristics (brought about by the early -mid
1870's - late1880's reccessionary wave).
a) Simply allowing
laborism to force higher pay (and later Asquiths' more pro-active) reforms
expanded the purchasing power of labor (whilst cutting the ground from the more
extreme elements).
b) An expansion into new
colonies creating new markets - in turn raising demand for labor/wages and real
demand.
Until over-accumulation & market saturation led to
the crunch battle for markets of WW1, and the collapse of national capitalisms
in Europe.
The Global
Political-Economy - The fall
in real wages brought about by the victory of fascism across continental Europe
(smashing the labor movement) - and the (liberal imperialist) development of
the global pol/econ by the process of WW2 enabling USA led global
rev-reform FDR having
implemented rev reform in USA beforehand, in
response to the revolutionary shock of Huey p Longs’ `Share the Wealth’
campaign in the context of the Great depression – of which more later) in response to the post - WW2 radical
uprisings/expansion of the USSR empire into central Europe; provided the starting
point for the boom & expansion of free-trade & world market
(representing an advance on the old national capitalist systems of imperial
preference & tariffs that preceded them), Which then as before, could
generate their own development/momentum.
Conversely, the rise of global finance can
be seen as not merely another stage of development but as a quantum pol/econ
dynamic, that will either lead to its' (structural and molecular) revolutionary
metamorphosis, or its savage implosion. As no single state is capable of taking
the lead in the global reform of the system as FDR/USA was able to before.
As clearly, capitalism could only be saved from itself by
the tough love of the working classes, this begs the Q, WHY on earth did they time & again fail so miserably to
assume overlordship, to the extent that organised labor has been wiped out by
the power of global finance…
Eg the rise of global finance beyond the control of
the nation state has eliminated all room for bargaining between capital &
labor....
...& with it all room for revolutionary
reform/ reconfiguration of the geo political/ economic system in response to
radical shocks, such as had previously been implemented - when the state was
strong enough to act as arbiter between
capital & labor.
For threatened by a hemorrhage of hot money (seeking the highest short term return) the state must either carry out policies finance capital likes, eg conducive to short term speculative profits at the expense of industrial investment and reconstruction (which of course makes things worse over the long run), or alternatively carry through a comprehensive revolutionary transformation of the political economy, insuring all profits are re-invested in industrial civil reconstruction (instead of share dividends and speculation).
For it is
simply not worth the aggro and chaos finance capital will cause (eg through
currency destabilisation and capital flight), trying to cling to this or that
minor reform. Or indeed by resisting the swingeing cuts in services, investment
& workers' wages; hence also the permanent war on workers' civil rights viz
the need to consolidate this process politically.
Moreover the (global manifestation &) consequences of this policy....
....the arms race to bankrupt/ destroy
the USSR coupled with USA's backing (arming/ financing) of Islamic (&
other) fascists in the 3rd world (in order to maintain 3rd world peoples in
their subservience to core imperial elite) who choking on the despair they
(in partnership with USA led military plutocracies) themselves created,
turn their rage on the west (accelerating its slide into military pol/econ
anarchy).....
....& USA nuclear blackmail/
threats against China, leading to China developing nukes, scaring India &
correspondingly Pakistan into going nuclear...
...demonstrate
that this reconstruction must be global, requiring wartime sacrifices
to further fund it - or else in keeping the 3rd world crushed, the state will
choke on its own barbed wire & a degenerate military plutocratic elite will
re-emerge by default.
& Megastates India & China cannot take
over leadership from USA, as due to their sheer size, their military plutocratic
elites' (anti colonial) national security state justification for existing is
actually undermined by the growth of their economy, revealing them to their
own citizenry as their greatest enemy (rather than any foreign power
defending them from)... just as USA core (imperial) elite is undermined by its
eclipse by global finance.........
.....this is why it is impossible for the megastates
to eclipse USA as a new core military plutocratic power, (as USA formerly
eclipsed Britain)... so military plutocratic power pathology compels these 2
megastates along with USA (& also Japan/ proxy elites); to engineer wars/
pretexts to justify their remaining in control of the geo pol/econ agenda; even
to the extent of destroying the world (just to retain, control for as
long as it takes to destroy it).
(We deal with the apocalyptic issues
related to the collapse of the Russian compradorist regime in `Intro to Quantum
Materialism' & `Substance Over Form', but as the global coup has
dramatically given USA Caesarism aggressive command of/ a pretext to control
the geo pol/econ agenda, we must adapt our strategy/ gameplan to the framework
of imminent/ actual USA nuclear terror, rather than risk being conceptually
outgunned)
What happened to laborism/
Marxism illustrates its limitations as a reactive force…
…Eg equality as an end in itself, is
self evidently the most unviable of options – lacking the social econ glue/
allegiances organically present in the 10,000 year old war/ finance nexus…
…therefore as noted equality
cannot be stabilized as an end in itself, only as a means to an end, to
enable education of everyone vis (to deal with) overarching culture of the
common threats/ objectives confronting all humanity…
…which paradoxically requires the contempory apocalyptic
threats arising from Labor’s destruction to enable the level of desperation
required to forge both new global security architecture & the new geo
constitutional/ cultural agenda based on enabling humanity to gain mastery of
universal time, become God & visit the same crap on the next cosmic
generation…
Then WHY was the Russian revolution even possible???
......in the case of
Russia/ USSR (In 1917)....
(understanding how/ why USSR collapsed & how this relates to the military plutocracy's inability to reconfigurate/ reform itself in response to a radical shock is key to understanding how/ why the Revolution can seize control of the global military pol/econ agenda & why it couldn't before)
....The inability of landlordist
capitalism to confer on itself parliamentary legitimacy (via elections) due to
the land/ war Qs (unlike German, French, British counterparts etc) meant the soviet was the only bearer of political legitimacy.
Correspondingly (unlike in the west), the Bolsheviks
could simply lie their way to power by pretending things
would be hunky dory `Peace, Bread & Land' to win soviet
legitimacy.
....finishing of
Russian landlordism, but simultaneously & inevitably
paralysing the Revolution in the west by re-inforcing the same ineffectual
classical laborist mode as before...
...as radicals blinded by the Russian Revolution to the
need to combine a rev reconstructionist pol/econ framework with rev pol campaign to delegitimise the
Euro finance capitalist regimes, buttressed by participation in elections to
prevent the regime re-legitimising itself/ squeeze its position continuously (a campaign held together by hunger strikes
of antifascist PoWs - such as would have been viable in the contempory
situation had not September 11th raised the stakes & forced the Revolution
to raise them again likewise/ recalibrate its' operational strategy
accordingly; to simultaneously take on ALL apocalyptic threats from all
quarters in an operationally integrated framework – To se the various pre &
post Sept 11th 2001 rev paradigms, see `Substance Over Form’ vols
I-IV, included in Lucifer2.1.zip) unable
to win power,
.....though the residual strength of
the British/ French nation states/ empires was also an insurmountable problem
in the way of forging a Euro Commonwealth of the regions (by locking radicalism
within the operational framework of the nation state),
&
as German radicals could not consolidate a Marxist/ Stalinist framework (nor
the new model rev theory), by default control of the military pol/econ agenda
went to the political warlordist Nazis (backed by German military plutocracy as
the only way open to them to try & retain control of the military pol/econ
agenda).
......until, USA & contempory
finance, out of the goodness of their hearts, did us the enormous favor of
reducing Britain to a semi colonial outpost; which ENABLES the British to lead
the Euro Revolution (defining Europe as a bulwark against USA apocalyptic
expansionism, freeing USA visionary expansionism…), as nukes
notwithstanding, we (in Britain) are too piddling to be a threat to anyone but
ourselves.
- they also lacked the threat of nuclear oblivion to drive a
reconstructionist Rev pol/econ framework forward,
& every christ needs its' anti-christ).
The latent potential of
USA led capital did the rest, its latent strength/
capacity to absorb the radical geo shock (of Russian Revolution/ USSR expansion
into Eastern Europe post WWII/ growth of Communist parties geo politically) enabled
post WWII reform/ reconfiguration of global pol/econ after
fascism in west Europe had driven down wages, providing the foundation for a longwave boom (propelled further by
long term rising wages) after its defeat.
(Historically, reccessionary long
term falls in wages, combined with radical upsurge, stimulated reforms/
reconfiguration of the global pol/econ, which led to a long term increase in
wages/ real as opposed to speculative demand: eg the repeal of the corn laws to cut the ground from rev anti landlordist
Chartism in 1847, combining colonial
expansion with toleration of trade union bargaining in the 1890s, but post
WWI, ONLY the USA vis
FDR was strong enough to reform/ reconfigurate its own pol/econ in
response to the internal shock of Huey P. Long's `Share the Wealth' movement &
therefore LEAD geo politically, the reform of global military plutocracy).
Stalinism: the direct product of collapse
of landlordist capitalism combined with the bolsheviks lie/
failure to pre-educate urban masses on need for sacrifices for
reconstruction....
....their consequent failure to use
the kulaks to eliminate the middle
peasantry & in turn tax them to the hilt for primary accumulation
(civil society control of the econ through socialist finance,
instead of party control via the police)...
....(BOTH) resulting in reactionary
egalitarian chaos (consumption of surplus product for subsistence
instead of investment) which could only be stabilised by nat sec
state repression, justified by external enemies/ threats, a framework
which enabled cycles of partial reform of the system (development of a
reconstructionist agenda/ primary accumalation for investment/ development)
while the Stalinist national security elites retained control of the agenda
(helped by very real external threats)....
Stalinism depended on a combination of the nat sec state excuse AND on geo room for
bargaining/ growth within/ subordinate to GLOBAL capitalist hegemony
precisely BECAUSE laborism dependant on room for bargaining between
capital & labor, could not overthrow capitalism in the core states – to
enable socialist democracy to eclipse Stalinism (USA capitalism for its part could not crush USSR without
crushing internal laborism, which there was no overwhelming drive to do for as
long as internal radicalism could be absorbed by reforms granted via dynamic
reconfiguration of the global capitalist pol/econ in response to radical shocks - as it was unnecessary/
not generally worth the core elite's while to do so)
......But, when the post war boom strengthened the hand
of Black radicalism in USA, the threat of a connexion with working class
whites etc,
the USA union leaders did not set up their own labor party as it would have been flooded by blacks taking it in a revolutionary direction, out of their control
The legacy of slavery/ civil war/ segregation being that
wheras the state had legitimacy for whites, for blacks this was not the case;
therefore USA blacks initial political engagement tended to be revolutionary.
Even where as in the South, Martin Luther King leant on a liberal section of
the state for support vis civil rights campaign……This inexorably tipped over
into a push for economic justice/ democracy – which furthermore challenged the
legitimacy of the entire USA led geo pol/econ military plutocratic framework eg
vis Vietnam war; with revolutionary implications – immediately prior to his
assassination/ corresponding eclipse of civil rights movement by the Black
Panther Party……& this corresponding absence of a USA labor party, because
racialised class pressures/ divisions were/ are so acute, meant classical
bourgeois democracy (in USA) very weak & unable to rule through
parliamentary parties without an independent (presidential) strongman to pose
as arbiter between the classes.…But, there was (vis HP Long) scope for a
presidential figure to seek & acquire an alternative (anti regime) power
base (leaning on civil society in a struggle with regime) – linking a
presidential figure/ campaign with an ever increasingly radicalised civil
society… - as HP Long did vis his
`Share the Wealth’ campaign (in the context of the Great Depression) that began in the poorer backward states
(especially Louisiana) in deep south (against Louisiana gentry) that as of necessity
(to accomplish/ entrench its anti landlordist tasks) increasingly (broadened
its’ base by) attacking hegemonic finance capital throughout the USA – which
though was still strong enough (in USA) vis FDR’s leadership, to reform itself
in response to such a revolutionary shock; & was done so by giving the New
Deal teeth.
….this triggered a
geo pol/econ clampdown....
....the Vietnam war (military plutocracy could not
pull out of Vietnam until Blacks
crushed by Cointelpro, covert intelligence program, preventing a fusion with white working class), in order to make safe the...
shift to a speculative finance/ credit expansionary based
economy, preserving the independance of capital from civil society control in
the context of ever diminishing room for bargaining between capital
& labor - which found political expression in the Thatcher/
Reagan axis,
Eg (under cover of the Vietnam war) this political
crisis, was actually resolved through the geo economic crisis.....
(rise in oil prices as a result of the long term boom creating shortages/ strengthening the hand of the oil producer states in relation to the USA/ core states....
The core problem is that the war/ finance nexus
(military plutocracy) reigns as a law unto itself, making it impossible to establish
political economic mechanisms to guide development, to meet long
term threats to human survival in a concerted way (eg resource oil shortages/
environmental impact of genetic
engineering from biocorps beholden to no-one but their shareholders & even
the much bigger projects/ threats posed by climatic change....)
......which
impact of led to capital eclipsing the USA core empire....&
therefore meant that USA radical forces were outflanked by switch to credit/
speculative expansion.... (which meant that while USA radical forces were
trashed, there were enough of USA civil
society profiting from this system to
keep USA regime stable while the radicals could be outflanked/ crushed under cover of ideological
`anticommunism'/ Vietnam war)
........as an organic process
...(eg the petrodollars flooded back into USA
fuelling longwave credit/ speculative expansion.... & in turn recycled to
Latin America dictators/ which came back as capital flight plunder,
facilitating USA led military plutocratic loansharking (ratcheting up of interest rates to
astronomical levels) their systemic passing costs of crisis onto 3rd
world..... - as Joseph Stigliz ex World Bank Chief now
admits was the role of his
organisation....
- also of note is that this (interest rate
trap) was the original cause of Yugoslavia's disintegration... growing
debt led to tensions between the republics, & ultimately the desperate
playing of the nationalist card in a desperate attempt by the elites to retain
control of the pol/econ agenda.... this is analysed in Vol I Chapter 7 of S.O.F.)......
& Reaganite war boom ....
....the REAL objective of the Vietnam war was to keep USA
Black & White divided to stabilize USA led military plutocracy & this
the enemy accomplished/ won…
furthermore the
slaughter of 6 million Vietnamese so raised the costs of rebellion against the
USA imperium, that this in turn further aided the development of export led geo
strategic buffer states especially in east Asia further hemming in the USSR.
These
factors led to the strengthening of USSR’s parasitic military bureaucratic
elite & its’ corresponding internal econ collapse…
…what insured this collapse took place in a controlled
fashion was the exhaustion of the credibility of the USSR elite by the trap set
for them by the USA in Afghanistan…
Eg the corresponding collapse of credibility of USSR regime, producing a temporary, but decisively fatal, popular infatuation with all things western – specifically economic ideology, which gave power (control of the pol/econ agenda) to a class of oligarchical resource compradors, who in spite of rapidly growing unpopularity, were able to retain control by virtue of the fact that the newly (& temporarily) politically enfranchised Russian civil society were reluctant to get too close to the old soviet managers to oppose increasingly fascist compradors…
Eg even in the context of Yeltsin’s 1993 coup (as it was unfolding), Yeltsin retained just enough credibility as a democrat, for there to be just enough of a drag factor on the accummalation of support for Rutskoi/ Khasbulatov (leaders of Parliament against Yeltsin’s coup), for Yeltsin to be able to set a trap by lifting the police cordon, so that under their own undisciplined momentum, the (still) inadequate base of support would attempt to launch a premature insurrection – enabling Yeltsin to crush it with scarcely loyal troops.
But even if parliament had been able to restrain its supporters from taking the bait, had instead patiently martialed their forces (prior to restoring constitutional authority)…
…a military bureaucratic elite would if only be reluctant geo pol/econ default have resecured control of the internal geo pol/econ agenda as result of fears (& of course machinations to so trap them) of western geo political expansionism in the former Yugoslavia & elsewhere – which would have led to collapse/ compradorism again by a more convoluted route…
…the Chechen wars correspondingly were about burning of any threat from either the right (a la Hitler/ Zhirinovsky)or (more probably) the institutional progressive left (General Alexander Lebed) by deliberately degrading the army so as to prevent it functioning either as a fascist/ warlordist expansionist threat or (more likely a) powerbase against compradorism…
…Eg by time
Yeltsin’s democratic credentials lost, it was too late, as able to retain power
by sheer inertial default – for oligarchical compradorism…
…Eg USA backed Islamic tribal fascists/ warlords in a way
deliberately calculated to lure in the USSR – anxious to prevent not merely
collapse of a friendly govt (that also upheld women’s rights etc), but the
threat of Islamic fascism gaining such critical momentum that USSR’s nukes in
Central Asia be over-run by Islamic fascist warlords – designed to turn
Afghanistan into USSR’s Vietnam – so that regime authority flaked away as it
(had no choice but to) fought a losing battle to raise the costs of such
ventures sufficient to prevent geo psycho political momentum leading Islamic
fascists over-running USSR’s Central Asian nukes…
Critical to this USA orchestrated campaign was the
strategic depth of this campaign – based on USA’s historic alliance with
Islamic fascism…
Eg as mideast was not their backyard (like Latin America)
necessity compelled them to lean on authentic independent/ autonomous forces…
Unlike in Latin America, where axis of military fascist compradors, landlords & colonial multinationals could hire the thugs required & employ the tactical expertise/ resources necessary to maintain control…
…Paradoxically
also having a shared Christian culture meant such was less
effective as an agency of control – as such would be too transparent a means of
control, so that paradoxically gave rise to Liberation Theology as a way to
define seperateness from colonial overlords
Furthermore (as noted) the geo historical culture (of the
Islamic world) was highly conducive to such – as the cultural vortices of
Mecca/ Medina were too big for any single (rather weak) nation states to
control, hence the Saudi Royal/ Islamic fascist clerical axis, to cover their
flank against a milinairist convergence…
Q Why was Rome not similarly susceptible to such a millenialist convergence???
As already noted (vis conflict over control over Holy Sepulchre between different Christian factions – contained by Muslim gatekeepers) the centre of power of Christendom (vis Church) lies in Jerusalem…
…as evinced by the Crusades & popes attempts to garner power by promoting such – however as this is the flashpoint between 3 geo cultures, it is less viable as a reliable source of power than Mecca was (in the Islamic world).
So that without
reliable control of the cradle of Christian ideology, the church could not
ideologically eclipse the power of the nation state as was seen
as the mere tool of national interests, wether the Italianate Princes, Spain or
France…
This made Islamic fascism/ millennialism a powerful geo
political weapon vis anticommunism…
Not only in Afghanistan (with Saudis paying regular
danegeld to such to wage their campaigns outside of Saudi Arabia) &
correspondingly the Pakistan of general Zia, the use of such by Anwar Sadat
against leftists in Egyptian universities, by Israel’s Shin Bett against
secular Palestinian radicals, an earlier anti communist alliance
in Iran that deposed Mossadegh as premier (until the excesses of the Shah so
offended Iranian national consciousness that this became untenable for clerics
seeking to retain infleuence over their people) & other such…
But at a price, which was that as Islamic fascists hated
the result of their alliance with the USA (arising from the conduct of both),
& such was obviously not their fault, this deepened their
antipathy to USA – a growing cult pestilence of psycho political transference…
…manifesting itself as a number of levels, including
increased power/ infleuence for Islamic fascists/ repression of women;
particularly lack of access to birth control – leading to a horrendous
demographic crisis/ increasing/ entrenching poverty which broadens/ deepens the
culture of psycho political transference…
…leading ultimately to Sept 11th 2001 (with a
number of precursor attempts)…
The Q of USA backing for Israeli expansionism, in this
ergard has a double character…
…on the one hand it does represent a
fundamental general & indeed legitimate fear that if not stood up to, if
the issue is ignored, no Arab land is sacrosanct from colonial
plunder/ outright theft…
…which has fed into the logic of national security state
regimes that could be played of against each other…
Such as USA/ Saudi’s encouraging Saddam Hussein (originally aided by CIA as the alternative to Iraqi Communists consolidating power) to invade the Shat Al Arab waterway – leading to 1 million dead in Iran/ Iraq war (& curiously also the national security consolidation against Iranian leftist by the theocrats), but requiring such increased production of oil as to lower the price of oil – resolving the oil crisis for the USA led geo pol/econ regime…
& in
this context (after Iran/ Iraq war) April Glaspies’ comments about USA `not
getting involved in Arab border disputes’ when Saddam Hussein complained about
Kuwait drilling/ stealing oil from under Iraqi borders’ sub strat, would
certainly be consistent with USA imperial interests vis a strategy of
containment of Iraq to prevent any, especially a nuclear power
emerging in the region which could threaten USA interests – by so provoking
Iraq into invading Kuwait as to give a pretext for USA to maintain imperial
hegemony…
But it also represents a kind of political adolescence,
that serves as an excuse for not addressing mideast disunity (especially
between Sunni & Shia), the need for a secularised progressive vision/
women’s rights/ education/ power to stabilise the apocalyptic demographics;
& above all using in a cencerted fashion, the oil card as a
lever to engineer such…
…but, as the whole world (including/ epecially the west)
has (as noted) an adolescent attachment to apocalyptic threats/ WMD etc, it is
perhaps appropriate, that the Palestine Q can only be resolved by
using it as the conduit to forge the new global security
architecture enabling the resolution of such threats - & that this process
be led by an elderly adolescent (yours truly)
Whence, at the battle of Jerusalem,
humanity, with the mothers as the moral vanguard eclipsing/ resolving the
paradox of arm, takes ownership & responsibility for their revolution &
their world…
As at 14/8/05 the entire system has long been entirely
contingent on massive USA expansion of USA budget/ trade deficit to fuel this
process & the Asian exporters (including/ especially China ELABORATE) being willing to underwrite USA’s deficits because
if they do otherwise the entire system will crash instantaneously into the
abyss)…
…leading to manifest crises of overproduction/ falling
rate of profit, due to production outstripping real demand, catalysing (with
rising unemployment) a further collapse of real demand, (frenetically
competitive) soaring interest rates (to try to prop up the currencies),
hyperinflation & the aforementioned geo pol/econ tailspin….
To illustrate the truly remarkable way the rust has held
the system together for so long, what strengthened this perverse
arrangement was how, in the early 90’s, interest rates came down dramatically,
when the class struggle appeared decisively won by the elites, further
enabling the shift to a combo of ever looser credit expansion &
corresponding over accumalation in the emergent markets…
…Eg beforehand. The weapon of high interest rates was an
organic weapon/ mechanism to deter political intervention by the state keen to
arbitrate between interests of capital & labor; or even compel finance to
subordinate itself to the interests of civil society
& when President Clinton attempted to clip back the
budget deficit, weakening demand for East Asian goods, the result was the SE
Asian crisis of 1998, triggering organic switch of hot money to the dollar as a
so called safe haven currency, which organically fuelled a new wave of USA
import led credit expansionary boom…
Eg the underlying logic being, if the arse falls off the
dollar, this will trigger such a geo pol/econ tailspin, that the consequent
soaring interest rates/ global credit crunch/ hyperinflationary death spiral
means that no other currency can be a `safe haven’.
Indeed the fact that the USA is now propped up by the
fact that the dollars fall (vis trade/ budget deficit – generated speculative
finance/ credit expansion) creates expectation of higher interest rates &
therefore dampens demand/ price of oil/ causing a contra tendancy
for the dollar to rebound; therefore temporarily stabilising the inexorable
(general) propensity to eventual dollar collapse catalysing soaring interest
rates, global credit crunch/ hyperinflation & corresponding apocalyptic geo
pol/econ tailspin (including in the mideast)…
…Is sufficient to demonstrate that USA nuke attack
against Iran would not enable a temporarily stabilised nuke
terrorist control of the geo pol/econ agenda, merely trigger (the final) geo
pol/econ meltdown/ historical electrocution in any case…
…as we shall see later, this fact is the one factor that will give humanity a small window of opportunity to seize command of its own destiny when geo pol/econ meltdown does occur…
… if we
fail to exploit it to the full, then from a variety of apocalyptic standpoints
we face collective annihilation…
Before we move onto the phenomenon
of Sept 11th 2001 & the consequent geo pol/econ paradox of apocalyptic
stability, we should clarify why neither China nor India
nor anyone else, can lead a new rev reformist reconfiguration of the global
military plutocratic system…
in the way outlined earlier to recap:
1) The British by repealing the corn laws in 1847 (in response to the revolutionary threat from Chartism) enabled cheap imported grain to increase both domestic & foreign purchasing power/ increased demand for British manufactures & a multiplier effect of consequent rising long term wages leading to rising real demand/ longwave econ boom until approx 1870…
2) Whence market saturation led to a longwave fall in wages leading to political/ general union radicalism – which was resolved by a combo of colonial expansion into/ carve up of Africa, creating the economic space (vis expanded markets) to increase wages…
…the internal brittleness of the European states, their diminishing capacity for reform/ rising laborist expecting squeezing the nation state elites, pushing them into the 1914-1945 conflict…
NB* only in Russia did a laborist revolution take power, because only in Russia did the land war/ political legitimacy Q merge in such a fashion that elections were not possible for fear of a general land war, destroying elites outright, which meant only the soviet held political legitimacy & therefore could take power just by promising `peace, bread, land – not possible in the parliamentary states where the land, war, political legitimacy Q did not fuse so starkly…
…After which only the USA (reforming itself internally vis FDR’s NEW Deal given teeth in response to the revolutionary shock of Huey P Longs’ `Share the Wealth’ movement) was capable of leading the global rev reform of the military plutocratic system – in response to radical shock of USSR’s westward expansion…
…which led
us to the internal crisis vis rise of black radicalism
threatening to merge with white labor & need for its repression under cover
of the Vietnam war & switch to a speculative finance based credit
expansionary system.
…For when the USA was a rising power, it was stabilised
by the vast opportunities afforded by the ethnic cleansing of the original
inhabitants combined with waves of cheaper immigrant labor
filling up the vast spaces of anessentially imperial enterprise (believing ever
more in its manifest destiny)…
…it also acted as stabiliser of the
British/ European nation states, by functioning as an alternative to
frustration/ political dissent in said old countries…
This is not the case
with extremely brittle megastates of China & India – for whom because of
their sheer size, as they acquire a certain degree of strength come to be seen
by their own people as the main threat to their interests/ security (rather
than any other foreign state) & which modern states came into being as
specifically 3rd world national liberationist entities – in which
capitalism cannot rule in its own name without this catalysing said explosive
dynamic even earlier…
In China (formerly part of the core
radical grouping to break away from imperial control – to forge the modern
state; & now in a paradoxical sense BOTH an ideologically 3rd
world socialist state AND the last & greatest of the USA enabled buffer
states to socialist expansion), Chinese capitalism cannot even rule in its own
name & so the more it develops, the more it must depend upon nationalism as
a dangerous means to try & maintain control of the internal geo pol/econ agenda
– just as USA does the same as it loses imperial control (in a way analogous to
the way that limited pre WWII Chinese development caused japan to take fright
& launch a pre-emptive colonial assault); in both USA & china leading
to geo pol/econ & social liquifaction – were this process not cut across by
collapse of USA credit expansionism beforehand…
Wheras in India, it was only the
eclipse of the USSR, that cut across India’s 3rd world nationalist
ideology/ socialist fuedalist paradigm, that (for geo cultural/ political
reasons, including the need to match China) similarly allowed Indian capitalism
to develop…
Eg post WWII (after independence won
from a weakened Britain, handing over power to avoid India lining up with the
core radical bloc etc) India’s centripetal tendanciesheld in check by combo of
this 3rd wordlist ideology & the fact that to develop either a
socialist bloc program or baldly pro USA approach would have led to superpower
engagement/ support on either side, which would so obviously have led to the
self defeating ruination of the objective, that a decisive consensus could
never be found to advance such causes (rendering them inherently abortive).
Hence post independence, socialist feudalism held India together by sheer
inertia…
&, the collapse of this
consensus (with collapse of the USSR) while unleashing the latent power of
Indian capitalism, means that as the Dalits also increasingly begin to see
Indian megastate capitalism (elites in general especially landlords – vis the
explosive land Q merging with the megastate Q vis elites being seen) as the
MAIN enemy of their own people/ interests. In turn unleashing a new (or
reconstituted/ much more powerful) explosive ideology, in a self defeating
attempt to assert a new Indian nationalist identity/ vision – in the form of
Hindu fascist RSS/BJP/VHD; which threatens to blow India/ subcontinent (&
the world) to smithereens…
…unless checked by the geo strategic
framework outlined earlier…
Correspondingly, the effect of Sept
11th2001 destruction of the World Trade Centre….
By the USA’s old Islamic fascist
allies, who because they could not in
any way be to blame for the state of their countries they had held back/
trashed in their joint war with USA against secular socialist forces, attacked
the USA in an act of psycho political transference
…was to actually (temporarily) stabilise
the USA speculative finance/ credit expansionary regime by enabling the `war on
terror’ to provide sufficient psycho political firebreaks on the pol/econ
agenda, that the scandals of the ENRON affair did not generate
their own irresistible dynamic & catalyse the crash of the entire system
(which given the enormous budget/ trade deficit – $7 Trillion & $700
Billion annualised respectively - was otherwise sufficiently ripe for)…
However, as USA imperial prestige
demanded that for every USA citizen killed in WTC attack, that many more brown
people pay a higher price in blood & treasure, bombing the mountains (&
already heavily bombed out) lands of Afghanistan was clearly insufficient. Only
an attack on Iraq could restore USA imperial credibility. Never mind Saddam
Hussein’s hostility to Al Qaeda (in contrast to claims they were allied), never
mind that the worst crimes (Iran/ Iraq war & Halabja massacre) that Saddam
Hussein’s regime committed were largely commissioned by USA/ its’ allies ,
& no one had stood trial for such in the west. Or that the USA’s moral
credibility as owner of 10,000 nukes & policeman of WMD looks inadequate.
Imperial credibility was
at stake. Was the USA the world’s only superpower or not? & if
so, it had to put up. To do otherwise would have led the geo
political piranha to smell blood, so only by creating a quagmire
in Iraq could the situation be temporarily stabilised.
Of course oil was the second of 3 factors ( the most sinister, USA Rapture psychology we shall deal with later). But even this factor, its apparent thinly disguised covert character had a reassuringly practical/ sane if not very legal/ moral appearance to it – much more worrying being the character of the other 2 factors woven into this covertly overt factor…
Even then, at the time I expected proxy forces to be used, as the USA was chased out of Lebanon back in 1983. The outcome appeared so insanely predictable I doubted even George bush would commit to such an obvious cataclysm…
So
in conclusion, the epoch of collapsing USA led global speculative finance/
credit expansionism, is simply the final manifestation of automatic linear
evolutionary development vis (on basis of) the hegemony of matter/ finance over
human consciousness/ global civil society…
…but to understand what is required of/ for humanity to
avoid oblivion/ transcend the corresponding apocalyptic epoch, we need to first
understand (in greater depth) how the decisive/ pivotal historic factor, our free
will borders the limits of automatic development (on basis of hegemony
of matter/ finance over human consciousness/ global civil society)…
…How, as a default setting, we are:
Intelligent
life, with the capacity to become a deity (& visit the same crap on the
next cosmic generation)…
…emerged out of
pondscum, ultimately overpopulated the natural economy, causing it to resort to
settled agriculture which thence had to be defended…
…which
in turn impelled weapons technology (especially metallurgy), complex forms of
social pol/econ organisation (social stratification) – the consequent
enslavement of humanity before the first great machine it had ever created, the
war/ finance nexus…
The
consequent (linear evolutionary/ automatic development of) hegemony of matter/
war/ finance nexus over human consciousness/ (global) civil society…
…is
most starkly reflected in (Judeo Christian Islamic) Christian legend of `The
Fall’…
(The most
noteworthy primordial manifestation of the subordination of consciousness to
matter) … that (as) even, especially the light bearer (`Lucifer’)
was cast out for rebelling against God (vis encouraging man to seek independant
knowledge of good & evil), that demonstrably humanity cannot
save itself by its own autonomous revolutionary initiative, but must instead
wait for external divine intervention… this legend is the geo
psycho political caldera of the entire Judaeo – Christian –
Islamic world. & it is in this geo psycho political setting that the fate
of all humanity will be decided more than anywhere else in the context of the unfolding
global pol/econ implosion of the war/ finance nexus.
..... that in order to physically as well as intellectually preserve/ restore/ extend light in both forms (electrical & intellectual), humanity must exploit the chaos/ fear engendered by the final collapse of military plutocratic system to push a rev geo pol/econ framework (which we outlined in `Battle of Jerusalem') enabling it to gain hegemony over its own creation (consciousness gaining hegemony over matter...) vis not only a culture of common threats/ objectives confronting all humanity (especially in immediate term, to develop sustainable energy sources - aided by civil society control of finance/ its own creation - humanity no longer subordinate to the war/ finance nexus) – but the overarching Universalist Conception – that (in the context of the new global security architecture) the global pol/econ constitutional framework must be geared towards enabling humanity to master its own time so that it can understand/ master the unwritten universal constitution of universal time per se....
The very beginings of this new pol/econ culture are to be found in the hope that comes from the beginnings of a viable strategy/ methodology to deal with said apocalyptic threats - under pressure of said threats. Representing the pivotal point in history, the precise point at which human consciousness begins to assert its hegemony over matter/ finance/ its' own creation (hence to name `Lucifer2.zip' - an aggressive refusal to submit to our primordial original fear - expressed in the legend of `The fall', but to exploit the chaos to seize command of our own destiny)…
....to
break our own programming & seize command of our own destiny (through the methods outlined in ` Battle of
Jerusalem' in `Lucifer2.zip'- refer back to as required)
…which
defined the hope of salvation in Christianity…
…emerging amidst the despair of slaves, in an all
powerful Roman empire & based on nothing but a desperate hope in an
afterlife & a willingness to die for such – so impressing the Roman elite,
that such percolated upwards until it had formal power…
…so that even though certainly subordinate to Roman
power, the logic levers of the war/ finance nexus, as Rome crumbled
Over whelmed by the frontiers tribes
stimulated to/ forced to band together in ever larger more effective formations
for defense (against the Roman empire) seeking plunder/ tribute
…the church based on a transcendent vision, was still
able to spread its infleuence in ways not open to imperial legions alone (though
often the 2 went hand in hand – including successor figures like Charlemagne) –
let alone the old tribal/ national Gods of Roman/ pre Roman times…
…thus this remnant of Rome, provided the supranational
basis/ framework for (post Roman) feudal Europe…
The church serving as a medium for the supranational
transmission of education, culture, bureaucracy – an aid to the fragmentation
of power in Europe, between Kings, barons the Church & increasingly
finance; necessary to insure the process of capital accummalation was not under
the control of a single plundering Caesarist entity…
…so that capital accummalation could take place under
more dynamic/ flexible circumstances…
While other states/ empires may have been far more advanced, providing knowledge for Europe’s development, & been better at war or finance, no state was better at combining the 2 over an extended timeframe than Europe (aided by fragmentation of power – enabled by the supranational framework of the Church/ Christian ideology)
…the centre of gravity shifting from the Italianate
cities to Conquistador Spain to mercantile Holland & then finally
mercantile England/ Britain. Protestantism increasingly emerging as a national
religion functioning as a lever enabling capital to break from the power of the
old feudal supranational catholic framework (yet without being
subject to the control of any caeasr because of the still continuing
fragmentation of power in Europe)…
…So that in this shifting process finance ceased to serve
the (feudal) sword, rather the (state) sword increasingly served the interests
of finance…
…a point reached decisively at the beginning of the
English civil war when Parliament refused King Charles demand for war taxes
unless it be given control of the army…
…hereonin, the merchants being the decisive consolidating
power in the land. As equality as an end in itself be the most
unstable/ unviable of all systems/ concepts leading to overturn, overturn,
overturn, lacking the organic drive/ glue of the war finance nexus
equality as a means to an end to enable education to deal with common threats/ objectives confronting all humanity we shall examine later
which possessed the power to break any power that sought
to generally assault its interests…
…in turn increasingly dependant on classical rationalism/
materialism (& which increasingly ceased to require aid from movements
based on Utopian visions) to flesh out its interests (including as we have seen
the threat of revolution)…
Ultimately, the single mercantile superpower (England/
Britain) was prevented from being able to develop caesarist ambitions by the
European fragmentation of power, eg French revanchist support for the American
revolution – checking any possibility at all of passing costs of falling rate
of (British) mercantile profit onto American colonists – being the classic
example; awash with correspondingly cheap capital, had by default no choice but to find an outlet for that
capital in industrial investment (aided
by profitable forced trade with the Indian subcontinent – restricting domestic
producers)…
…a process further catalysed by (leading to
longwave boom) by internal political repression in the wake of
the French revolution (France having bankrupted itself by revanchist support
for the American colonists – having been defeated by Britain in the battle for
control of colonies/ markets in the Seven Years War); whilst simultaneously a
modern industrial middle class/ skilled workforce provided a prop of social
differentiation/ stability against the new industrial proletariat…
…this first longwave econ boom of modern
industrial capitalism, was dependant upon repression rather than the
institutionalisation of labor, in many respects resembling in such fashion the last
globally self destructive USA led speculative finance/ credit expansionary
based boom…
…a historical pointer (as sunrise is to sunset) to the
present final exhaustion of linear automatic development based on
the hegemony of matter/ finance over human consciousness/ global civil society…
…& the need therefore, to break our programming for
self destruction, through a new transcendant vision,
(the universalist conception that defines that the written secular constitution
must be calibrated to give people ever more control of their time, to
understand the unwritten universal constitution – gain mastery of God’s time
per se) calibrated
(not to an afterlife but) dealing with multiple apocalyptic dynamics/ threats,
we shall now outline further…
Paradoxically, the geo pol/econ outline of our salvation
is to be found precisely in apocalyptic threats unleashed by the war/ finance
nexus vis its’
Organic
consumptive patterns of control
The dialectics of resource depletion play an increasingly important geo military pol/econ role.
This is not a coincidence, but built into the very process of geo pol/econ linear development/ evolution of the war/ finance nexus…
- At the macro & micro level, consumption functions as a destructive productive means of control (by USA led war/ finance nexus). Eg as an organic process by cconsuming resources/ land etc, you exerted power/ control at the micro & macro level, preventing adversaries individual & macro political, making use of them (Godfather III - `Your enemies grow strong on what you leave behind’)…
And post WWII, this formerly incipient dialectic came into its own as a decisive factor in its own right.
Firstly as a (molecular & macro) block against revolution
This is also why USA helped buffer states to develop as a geo pol/econ bulwark against spread of USSR bloc post WWII.
Secondly
(after threat of revolt subsided) through sheer inertial (& hubristic post
cold war continuing) momentum.
&
the psycho political impact of defeat of progressive nationalist resistence in
the cold war.
(Role of Vietnam war in terrorising resistence
`destroying countries to save them’ to raise prohibitively the costs of doing
so)
…Combined with the cultural/ techno/ corporate
expansionism necessary to re-inforce/ consolidate such
including (as a largely organic more than conspiratorial
process) to sell the western consumerist vision
The fact that in certain areas of the world, eg Africa, the sheer geographic vastness/ impenetrability, means the whole world (to develop such) must proceed beyond imperial consumptive patterns of development (indeed as we shall see later exploit the chaos arising from geo pol/econ breakdown in order to develop the political will) to develop the solar powered desalinatory technology that enables the scale of the undertaking to be accomplished (by strengthening the basic socio econ unit as a freestanding unit largely self sufficient in water, energy & access to info.
Which
fuelled a duel desire `to get a piece of the pie’ &/ or indeed more often
than not, simultaneously, `hit back’ – albeit nihilistically…
Manifest
via a multi faceted organic response which critically undermines the USA led
metropolitan core via
This direct imposition of the hegemony/ interests of the
first world metropole over the 3rd world (analogous to the way the
Roman empire dominated the frontiers – stimulating the development of the very
armed formations that over-ran them) has a most curious effect; in that the
very structures of imperial control become the very agencies of imperial
ruination…
…by those seeking a piece of the pie &/ or to `hit
back’ often simultaneously, through insecurity/ instability of supply of key
resources, hopelessly unsustainable rates of immigration to the metropole along
its own rapid transit systems – as well as through asymmetric warfare…
…which taken together amount in effect to a global
peasant war – threatening to over-run the USA led metropolitan core…
This compares starkly with the only other remotely
similar process in history, the crisis of slavery:
The
crisis of slavery encompassing USA/ Russia/ India/ China (& representing the break up of the
ancient world under the impact of the British industrial political economy) is
pivotal to understanding/ illustrating the geo historical context of how:
Ongoing genocide of 80 million native Americans (from pre
independence to late 19th
centuary & to a lesser extent Australian Aboriginals)…
…culturally legitimated colonial 19th
& 20th centuary slaughter in Africa…
…Feeding back into racial supremacist ideas
in Europe/ corresponding cultural legitimation of genocide AND
geo contextualised/ set framework for such in China/ Japan…
(in Russia/
China lacking colonies as aid to social differentiation their people more their
colonies)
…& Total war in WWII (partly aiding, the in any case,
organic dynamic/ strategic imperative to aerial bombardment/ nuke war in same)…
…corresponding cultural legitimation of post
WWII nuke cold war logic (& use of proxy Islamic fascist forces)
leading to contempory
asymmetric warfare…
…The temporary
exhaustion of cultural legitimation for genocide etc in context of multi facted
MAD enabling chance to develop
Because it illustrates the hitherto
constraints/ lack of options available to states (& radical forces), to
break out of such dynamics, if they wanted to - & in so doing,
further illuminates the character of the one time opportunity we have to seize
our destiny & gain mastery over ourselves…
…paradoxically propelled/ enabled by aforementioned multi
faceted MAD threats to enable the threats to be balanced of against each other
like bricks in an arch – providing the context for the new geo pol/econ
constitutional framework & held together by the overarching cultural vision
of the Universalist Conception…
Eg until maximum development of & final
exhaustion of capacity for development on basis of the war/ finance nexus, it
was impossible to base society on the universalist conception & therefore,
defacto subordinate to war/ finance nexus, in latent form if only in the form
of decisively unbridled ego….
As in the post Roman era (aided by the fragmentation of
power vis the church) Europe increasingly found its true geo cultural
boundaries, its true form (vis war/ finance nexus)…
This in turn created opportunities for emergence of &
spread of Islamic empire…
…Eg power in the Islamic world was based less than in
Europe on a central kingly power holding the balance of power between different
baronial factions & corresponding foreign magnates – (the unreliability of
desert agriculture did not to much lend itself to such) providing framework for
emergence of finance over the sword…
…than a more visionary pooling of social –
economic risk & therefore an emphasis on central accumalation/ funding of
acumalation of knowledge to help
alleviate that social & economic risk & corresponding cultural
developments…
…which of course found expression in ideological/ geo
cultural mores/ literary manifestations of such…
The Koran was the cultural/ programmatic genesis of such a process that fed the European enlightenment/ decisively accelerating its intellectual/ corresponding material development in concert with its demonstrably more resilient & flexible war/ finance nexus (to the point that said process could become self sustaining/ propelled in the emergent mercantile/ industrial world)
Still subordinate to hegemony of matter
over consciousness (as then as yet, no terrifying accumalation of military geo
pol/econ apocalyptic threats/ capabilities & therefore positive technological
corollaries, to enable universalist conception etc)
Hence a tendancy as wealth accumalated, to split into
poles of attraction….
The
Abisaids deposing the Ummayads as caliphs (& shifting the capital to
Baghdad – to consolidate power); & the Ummayads moving west, to the Iberian
peninsula, driving out the Visigoths to establish the nominally subordinate sub
Caliphate (nominally loyal to Baghdad); of Al Andaluscia until the Berber
fundamentalists decalred themselves rival caliphs forcing Al Andaluscia to
either go out of its way to subordinate itself to one or other claiment to the
caliphate; or alternatively declare openly what they were defacto, a caliphate
in their own right…
This however changed the geo political psycho dynamics
completely …
…the bold assertion of contra authority having a number
of effects…
Firstly, in setting a precedent (vis
usurpation of legitimising authority), making it psycho politically possible
for coups to be launched to control Cordoba (capital of Al Andaluscia) –
destabilising & ultimately fragmenting the caliphate into 23 city states – following a curiously European
pattern of internal geo political fragmentation……
Secondly (because of Al Andalus particular geo
political position on borders of Christendom & Islamic world…) in
ideologising the region as the principle pole of the Muslim world antagonising
the Christians of Al Andaluscia – helping fuel conflict later on…
The caliphate fragmented when one of the pretenders
called in Berber fundamentalists to help fight their claim…
…leading over the longer term to fragmentation of Al
Andaluscia (decline of Cordoba as the capital 100 years after pronouncement as
caliphate)
Q WHY did the lack of central unity better
serve Euro Christian model than the Islamic model???
Because such fragmentation of power produced such an
emphasis/ premium on the military/ warlordist, as to so corrode the very
(cultural/ developmental) strength of the Islamic empire (in Al Andalus) that
gave it broader appeal. Meaning it was less well able over time than before to
dynamically absorb/ retain new allies/ converts from which Christendom - &
therefore lost the geo psychological initiative & became prone to the
dynamics of supra (ethno religious) national war (between Christendom &
Islam) – from a force which had learnt sufficiently from the Islamic empire to
not be seen (at least for long enough to maintain decisive momentum) as such
total savages, that they lost/ failed to gain the geo psychological initiative…
…& once underway, this process bcame increasingly
irreversible…
Furthermore,
as increasing wealth led to decisive fracturing of the Islamic world, the
effect of Islamic (fanatic) warlordism was to exacerbate this fragmentary
tendancy…
Wheras
the European model war/ finance nexus was, as already noted, actually aided in
terms of aforementioned geo pol/econ development/ flexibility by
its fragmentary dynamic
Eg
Spain (Castile/ Aragon etc) ultimately in becoming defined by as expansionist
supranational catholic universalist identity…
…vis
gold/ silver from the colonies, which enabled it to hold together (albeit at
ruinous expense in blood & treasure) an empire in Europe – whilst
simultaneously acting as the conduit for capital accumalation/ mercantile
development in the rest of Europe (again at Spain’s own expense)
This
flexibility of development contrasts with the Islamic empire’s successor’s, the
Ottoman empire, which paradoxically was undone by its unity
(denying it such organic/ developmental flexibility – yet largely imperative,
emerging as it did from the need to pool economic risk in a centralised state
as determined by the logic of pol/econ geography – over much of the area of the
Ottoman empire)…
the (post 1492) rise of the western war/ finance nexus led eventually to the progressive bottling up/ eclipse of the Islamic empire (its centre shifting from west to east vis the Ottomans)…
…in a way curiously analogous to the way the decline of military plutocratic system (vis USA empire) led to collapse of the USSR; manifest in increasing/ progressive tendancy to ideological/ intellectual stagnation…
…Spain sought & sucked in wealth from the `new world’
to strengthen Spanish control of the increasingly corrupt church – fuelling
national (German) demands for a `cheap church’ (& more freedom), the birth
of a Protestant ideology which in turn became the rallying cry of merchants
seeking leverage away from despotic control – finding its decisive expression
in the English revolution.
From the beginning therefore, colonial expansion by
European states was bound up with an internecine struggle for survival between
European states to avoid such loss of strength as would see them
submerged by others – hence competitive expansion in the new world – which in
turn gave rise to an independent expansionist logic.
Hence growing out of the soil of Europe, (the struggle
for) independence &/ or freedom at home, meant subjegation/ slavery for
other peoples abroad…
In the
light of the fact that all states supported their colonies, expansionist
support therefore, had such strategic underpinning (by the British of their colonies
against the French)
As such states supported their colonies for strategic
reasons (& to a certain extent prestige as an end in itself) that
correspondingly firmly established same (including their expansionist
dynamics), such felt secure enough in their position to seek ever greater
freedom from crown control – such that whence attempts made to even begin
to pass costs of falling rate of profit onto the colonists AND
control their inexorable expansionist drives into native American territory
(out of a blend of desire for strategic control/ prevent them becoming too
strong and humanitarian concern)…
…The colonists rebelled – backed by the French – driven
by revanchist prestige – that if they did not, no one would ever take them
seriously again, which would be strategically fatal to their own psychology
& (correspondingly) what others could expect to get away with in relation
to them…
This raises the Q:
Why was it possible for conquistadors to be
able to use indigenous peoples as slaves, but the (largely British) USA
settlers wiped out the Native Americans & imported black slaves at great
expense???
In the initial period of colonisation, the extent of South American civilisation was its comparative undoing…
…eg the more backward (compared with later colonists)
conquistadors required help/ active co-operation not merely to learn the
terrain, but to locate/ exploit the
very metallic basis upon which their empire was at least initially principally
established…
Correspondingly (in terms of both their dependency on
the native people as well as Euro Church ideology), the process of cultural
legitimation (vis Visigoth Spain) demanded christianisation of (at
least some of) the survivors (obviously as the humanitarian
objections to the slaughter/ slavery had little practical pol/econ weight in
terms of strengthening Spains’ position, they fell by default).
Eg & as a process of geo pol/econ natural
selection brought the backward colonies to the richest pickings (in
terms of gold) first…
…it follows that after this came the
absorption of land/ other commodities – by those seeking a base of independence
from Catholicism especially from England, to which they sought a base for – in
order to re-export their revolutionary ideas/ ideology…
So a number of factors determined slavery or
annihilation:
Pre-existing development of people – enabling rapid theft
of portable wealth – which made more suitable to a relatively backward colonial
project – eg Spanish conquistaodors.
& the specific all encompassing ideology of the
church demanded souls for the consecration of Spain etc
Wheras the more developed English etc had little need for
such, as more inclined to seek to carve out a new world
(initially inspired by freedom from catholic domination, but gathering its own
independent geo pol/econ expansionist dynamic/ momentum) – so that
paradoxically their pursuit of freedom meant they had no use for the (in any
case less readily exploitable/ controllable) inhabitants (that the Spanish
passed over), so that the biggest (in numerical & expressed as a proportion
of the population) genocide (eclipsing Hitler/ Stalin/ Inquisition even Mao) in
all history was committed in the pursuit of freedom….
Hence the importing of slaves into the southern
plantations (vis cotton/ sugar etc)…
& the paradoxical ideological/ cultural geo pol/econ
faultlines that sprang up around this issue…
Initially held together during war of independence by a
fudge over `state’s rights’, between slave & free state (dead native
Americans notwithstanding)…
Black slavery was both a reassurance of the status of
whites & a threat to their liberty vis competition with such
(driving down wages etc)…
…added to this the southern states were closer to Britain
(to whom they exported `king cotton’) favoring cheap free trade imports –
wheras the industrial north favored tarrifs to nurture their industries…
The unfolding crisis of slavery in USA was precipitated
by attempts to expand slavery into northern freesstates…
A process catalysed by the Mexican war & corresponding compromise to avoid secessionist splits) dividing new states between free & slaveholding, southerners became both more defensive about attempts to deny them access to some new territories whilst simultaneously confident of slavery’s defacto consolidation – eg that formally recognised that be here to stay, which prior to the fudge they were less self assured about…
…therefore looked like weakness from hostile authorities
(prior to
this it was America’s vastness that slowed down the showdown until the geo
political squares on the chessboard
filled up with enough hostile forces/ interests to generate its own psycho
political momentum)
The low level civil war fought out between anti slavery
activists (eg John Brown et al) & pro slavery forces drilling the political
institutional & geo psychology of the 2 camps (& their interests) to
the point of all out open conflict vis southern seccession – supported by
British cotton interests – in effect a bashful form of colonialism…
…Correspondingly, this part of the crisis
of slavery was resolved through consolidation of the union against those forces
that in one form & another constituted a threat to the stability of the
interests of northern capitalism (& its’ laborist adjunct)
…which both the destabilising attempts to
extend slavery (eg in Kansas) a process
that flowed inexorably from the institution of slavery itself, necessitating
its abolition, & (vis the `40 acres & a mule’ demand) the
notion of racial equality which destabilised the gradient of social
stratification & therefore military plutocracy itself; yet without
the geo cultural conditions enabling the stabilisation of economic equality.
Therefore social/ econ & political (& internal/ external imperial) power
`found its’ own level’ in the post reconstruction era…
By comparison with this seismic event, the campaign
against slavery in British colonies in late 18th – early/ mid 19th centuaries was aimed against
increasingly marginal reactionary planter interests, was a key adjunct in the
cultural psychology of british political reform – to allow for representation
of complex interests – that such represented a bulwark against…
Eg without weakening/ removing the position of such, they
would be a (not least a psychological) deadweight against the new pol/econ
interests/ constituencies in the new middle/
working classes
Russia was defined by fear of the Mongol horde (& also as custodian of worldview/ orthodox Christianity)…
This in turn, meant Russia had to be so
big, which correspondingly meant unlike European
states, it had no clear (defacto) conception of fragmentation of power between
states…
…& this therefore, produced a more
insular perspective as external enemies were less of an everyday
threat than in Europe – which (correspondingly) threatened civil war to capture
the throne…
Therefore the only way to
resolve this was (materially) through an expansionist autocracy –
with (ideologically) the tsar seen as god’s direct intercessionary on earth (worldview
orthodoxy functioning as this ideological mechanism/ support)
Which in turn stabilised the position of landlords over
their serfs; in conjunction with the oppression of space
decisively diluting the potential for urban development/ markets/ guilds for
skilled tradesmen/ merchants to join – which over time would have challenged
the power of military feudal landlords/ become a power in its own right…
As (pre Alex II), the comparative historic gravity of the
urban centres was thence so weak that there could be no patriotic middle class
(as in the English/ American/ French Revolutions) positioned over time to take/
consolidate power/ reconfigurate the state…
…& wheras the French revolution/ sub caesarist
Bonaparte forced modernisation upon European states (led by the old elites in
alliance with their middle classes as a survival imperative), the
reaction to Bonaparte’s invasion of Russia was simply to burn the capital,
withdraw into the vastness of the territory & wait for winter/ the grand armee
to starve/ cut them to pieces on the retreat…
& as power in essence lay with
the landlords, it only lay with the tsar in terms of feudal
expansionism (to keep landlordism together)…
…therefore Pugatchev was snatching at a phantom…
…as was the Decembrist rising, which sought a
constitutional division of power – without the material basis to
consolidate/ bring such about…
With
expanding Russian empire positioned as the `gendarme of Europe’ post the 1848
revolutions, to act as a psychological chilling threat/ bulwark against further
such, was correspondingly brought into conflict with the deeper
geo political/ security interests of Britain/ France as well as turkey, leading
to the Crimean war (to bottle Russia up) – which (so) revealed (to the tsarist
central authorities – the successor Alex II) the inadequacy of Russian military
economic technical infrastructure…
Therefore (marginal external cultural
influences on the elite notwhitstanding) serious attempts at change were (only
really) stimulated by the Crimean war, which threatened (vis British
expansionism) the fundamental integrity of the inertial
expansionist Russian state…
…Eg competition in Central Asia…
Which forced the Russians not merely to
open a window on the world (in the spirit of
Peter/ Catherine the Great), but actually attempt something resembling
fundamental internal restructuring…
Tsar Alex II’s attempt to hothouse the
development of a modern Russian bourgeois, by trying to push through the
liberation of the serfs(agricultural capitalism to provide funds for industrial
investment), tended by & large to both
undermine the feudal economy AND create popular &
unrealisable expectations of radical reform (much of what was being attempted
was frustrated by the landlordist class); which fuelled (in many respects an
incendiary) discontent among students/ intelligentsia…
What partially stabilised this process was
that once this geo strategic / pol/econ process had begun (assassination of
tsar alex II & repression of
radicals notwithstanding), given the wider (western) geo pol/econ
imperatives could not be stopped…
Especially vis the French defeat in Franco Prussian war,
France’s desire for revenge & a partner on Germany’s eastern flank…
…the Russian need for a warm water port in Constantinople/
Istanbul…
Competition for territory vis the decomposing austro
Hungarian empire & related issues of national prestige/ credibility.
But, as the (aforementioned) Russian narrative (required to
hold the country together, of orthodox autocracy) would have been undermined by
the sort of pol/econ pluralism that a viable Russian capitalism
would have required (which is why it was no more than a geo
strategic pol/econ compact between the west & Russian autocracy/
landlordism)…
…Largely
foreign owned/ stimulated Russian capitalism (lacking at the time the clear
& proximite threat of communism on the border to encourage
development of the sort of reformist internal/ external geo pol/econ &
social coalition to enable it to secure itself by a stable social
gradient), therefore got squeezed between the political
illegitimacy of landlordism & the emergent working class
Which in the context of the aforementioned political
legitimacy crisis of 1917, functioned as the battering ram of a new cultural/
political caste/ bureaucracy able to eclipse/ replace the old Russian narrative
(of world orthodoxy) with the new cultural narratives of world socialist
Revolution…
…such be the way the crisis of slavery resolved itself in
Russia (gulags notwithstanding)…
India
Considering that the greatest superpower in all history,
the contempory USA, cannot with all the forces at its disposal, control 3 Sunni
held provinces in Iraq totalling 4 million Sunni Arabs…
…a
Q arises
HOW the hell did Britain
end up controlling the geo pol/econ directly/ indirectly of megastates
(possessing artillery & cavalry) India & China (leading to the failed
Indian rebellion of 1857 & the failed Taipeng rebellion of 1850-61) with
barely 100,000 troops & an advanced navy controlling the destiny of
hundreds of millions from thousands of miles away???
Well, in both cases, the very size & (particular
forms of) cultural sophistication of both states actually played
against them/ made them possible to take over/ manipulate…
WHY did India not have the
kind of fragmentation of power/ feudal warlordism that would have caused
it to suck in the whole world to enable it to finance its internal
wars, WHY did the Indians lack this vision???
Wheras the organic geo pol/econ internal/
external fragmentation of power in Europe is control over land, created the
longterm basis for the church (as a supranational ideological/ political
arbiter) to further aid this process of power fragmentation (providing
supranational ideological framework – giving rise to the later demands for a cheap
church) in the post Roman era…
Organic communal control of land in
India
(elaborate vis monsoon culture meaning land revenue main lever of econ control in caste based system)
…meant correspondingly, as the power of religion was too
closely allied to central power (in indian state/ empires) for it to have sufficient
leverage to play this role to a critical/ sufficient degree…
it either could not spread very far – as an extra
territorial framework/ structure, or this in turn meant that as the
ideology was not sufficiently independent from control of its
imperial patrons, a corresponding demand for a `cheap church’ (or
cheap Islam/ Hinduism etc) could not provide a sufficient geo
strategic framework (alliance)/ rallying cry to provide (eventual) cover for
merchants (in alliance with state then as overlords of such) break out as an
independent power…
(British of course aided by lack of continental engagement)
…India therefore naturally polytheistic…
& for (Euro Christian type) feudalism to work as
outlined, it needs to be reasonably well ideologically (vis church
framework) & geographically secure in its foundations over a fairly wide
area to allow it to function effectively in terms of fragmentation of power…
Eg in India parts may appear (more) suited to a feudal
type of system, but as its general culture (subject historically
to invaders from across the mountainous northwest) is inclined to social
feudalism
(ELABORATE)
…upon which, such empires historically sweep across the
whole country leaving such a corresponding cultural/ ideological social
language as to prevent a feudal/ Christian type framework
(capable of combining the type of internal/ external fragmentation of power
capable of giving rise to a capitalist system) taking root – so that
lacking such geo strategic depth (such as Spain had in reversing the
expansion of the Islamic empire); such scarcely able to factor as potential geo
cultural pol/econ frameworks…
Q HOW does
the idea of salvation being open to all through obedience (infleuenced by
Christianity???) in some sense alter/ or merely compliment this logic
(especially bearing in mind pre reformation Christianity was in inaccessible Latin mediated
by priests)???
Allied to this, empires within India tended over time to
naturally overstretch to the point that to finance the increasing
costs of machinery required to sustain them, they would have to levy such high
taxes, that they become internally weakened/ subject to resulting
fragmentation…
…in a sense, India was a gigantic empire/ imperial
enterprise waiting to happen – as when the Mughals became dependant on the
silver stream (indirectly from the new world) via France/ Britain to finance
their military state machine…
…providing the colonial powers with a foothold – such
that as the empire became still weaker/ more atrophied, (correspondingly) superior
military technique (& organising/ financing of such) of the French/
british powers (honed in fighting each other) by default sucked
them into championing one proxy or another to advance their interests, until
(with French defeated/ bankrupted) they were the main power
& this
correlates to the idea that the internal geo pol/econ dynamic geo pol/econ
agenda resulting from India’s size was paradoxically the chief factor that
played against it…
…creating an insular geo psychology, an insular
fragmentation of power
…that
contrasted dramatically with Europe, that increasingly sought to suck in the
whole world into enabling/ financing its nations to kill each other ever more
efficiently – in struggle for survival; producing an evolving war/ finance
nexus of optimised efficiency
Whereby the great crumbling
internal Mughal empire appears still as the greater threat to/ target of
smaller states – sufficient to allow the new rising empire to
continue to acquire power – so that the geo psychological dynamic becomes one
of resignation, enabling (British) consolidation of power – before a sufficient
degree of unity could overcome such, by which time it was too late…
Paradoxically the best example of
this can be seen in the 1857 rebellion of the remnants of the old order…
Whereby the corresponding
organic fragmentation of the resistence (&of course lack of proximite geo pol
re-inforcement of any plebian movement on the other – such as China had vis
USSR)
…& its defeat, was paradoxically
the precondition for the emergence of a modern all Indian
nationalism, that however still could not immediately drive out
the British Raj; precisely because the character of its internal divisions was
such, that as soon as it made any serious attempt to bring sufficient force to
bear, it tended to disintegrate into communal strife – leaving the British
above the fray – indeed possessed of a kind of paradoxical imperial
legitimacy…
THIS tendancy for the
sword to shatter into communal fragments as soon as made contact, is why Indian
nationalism had to follow a specifically non violent model (an
antecedant for the contempory
Revolutionary model of a diminishing calculus of force…), so as to
render imperial control increasingly non profitable/ contributing to exhaustion
of British imperial machine & allowing an all Indian national identity to
be cultivated…
…whilst simultaneously keeping to an
irreducible minimum communal strife – by relying principally upon the power of
inertia
…Gandhi seeking to make a virtue/
forge a concept of national legitimacy out of an operational
necessity…
Though so perilously thin was this
veneer of urban elite orchestrated inter communal unity, covering the hellish
depths of landlordist/ feudal communal insularity (with Gandhi as tuning fork
in chief), that as the british position became manifestly progressively weaker
(especially throughout the 1930’s), Muslims firstly looked to British
(paradoxical) imperial legitimacy to provide security gaurentees & then
ultimately/ irresistibly to the establishment of Pakistan in areas where they
had a contiguous majority…
The principle factors that allowed
the rest of India to hold together at all as an independent entity after
the British exhausted by 2 world wars…
…was the combo of this fragile
inertial concept of national political legitimacy, most strikingly evinced
in the hunger strike of Gandhi as a counter to the post independence anti
Muslim riots (following partition) & his subsequent assassination by Hindu
fascist RSS; which actually sealed the political legitimacy/ secular identity
of the Indian state – albeit dependant on the second factor…
…That the cold war threatened
superpower engagement in any seccession. This so raised the price of
seccession, that no decisive consensus could be found to prosecute such – enabling
India via a 3rd world nationalist ideology/ socialist fuedalist
framework
(elaborate)
to hold together by sheer inertia
The apogee of socialist feudalism
(of the Nehru dynasty) was Indira gandhi’s (post 1966 devaluation) increasingly
radical pol/econ program of nationalisations – attempted land reform, which
ultimately foundered against the fact that the people in charge of such were
themselves landed interests…
…& reaction
against authoritarian approach used to try to push such through…
This
in turn led to the pro market approach from desai…
Then
post Indira Gandhi’s assassination…
Eg the
authoritarian centre fuelling secessionist tendancies – eg Akali Dal in Punjab
to the extent that Sanjay Gandhi reduced to sponsoring Bhindranwalia in an attempt to split the regional
opposition – which backfired/ ultimately led to the showdown at the golden
temple in 1984 (& Indira Gandhi’s assassination)
…Rajiv
Gandhi became PM & adopted a market centred approach
Which
proved sufficiently unpopular to lose (1989) to a left split from Congress led
by VP Singh allied with other leftist/ regionalist parties & curiously, the
fascist BJP (& RSS/ VHP), whose leader LK Advani (against the backdrop of
Hindu fascist/ landlordist/ middle cclass opposition to VP Singh’s attempt to
sponsor legislation consolidating position among Dalits etc) saw the
opportunity to legitimate from within govt the destruction of the Barbary
Mosque at Ayodhya, & correspondingly seize command of the geo cultural
agenda in India for Hindu fascism, becoming the rallying standard among
India’s rising middle class.
This leaves us with the Q, WHY
did Indira Gandhi’s policy fail???
We know contempory Indian capitalism
growing beyond a certain point is seen as the enemy in a megastate
context by its own people…
…So WHY did Indira
Gandhi’s (semi authoritarian) 3rd world radicalism appear as
violating `freedom’???
Eg how the hell do you
account for a geo cultural concept of freedom that inexorably
leads the way to the fascist BJP – which (if unchecked) will blow India to
smithereens???
You can discern amidst
the insanity a kind of logic, whereby, India having gone through the traumas
resulting from its geo pol/econ insularity, from periodic invasions, from the Aryans,
to the Mughals to finally the British, through the struggle to break free from
the last, struggles to define its own concept/ understanding of freedom,
whereby its populous are ever more engaged in expressing themselves in relation
to the rest of the world…
…& rather than tolerate another
despotic raj however ostensibly enlightened, they would rather freely
choose to set out on the path to oblivion, so that finally on the edge of
perdition, as an animated globally connected civil society, they can learn as a
people what does not work, as the first precondition to becoming aware of what
can work, & what their role is - as future leaders of the human race –
defined by the universalist conception
China
China
differed from European fragmentation of power in a number of key respects.
Wheras Europe was defined by natural ethno national
linguistic/ racial borders – defining states most of which had access to the
sea – helping to consolidate these borders & with them the
European fragmentation of power between & (more or less) within states…
…the
lack of such (correspondingly consolidatable) ethno
political borders in China meant that to swallow another few thousand sqKm of
territory was not enough to rout your enemy/ consolidate power (in china), -
which in turn made the borders (& correspondingly geo pol/econ psychology)
between regional magnates even more unreliable – so that only by capturing/
unifying the whole of China – traditionally by securing the `Mandate
of Heaven’ with the support of
a peasant army & consolidating this position through extensive public works
projects that could only be undertaken by general mobilisation of the Chinese
state (pre-emptively weakeing the position of any warlords),
could order be established/ consolidated…
This characterised China
by virtue of its size as an imperial & therefore insular megastate from
ancient times…
…lacking Europe’s expansionist drive, because thank you
very much, it was quite big enough as it was & had to focus most of its
energies upon internal development/ holding itself together in the face of
regional faultlines/ social tension, rather than the expansionist colonial
conquests which European states had to undertake in competition
with each other to try & prevent themselves falling too far behind – which
in turn contributed to internal fragmentation of power (of a rising merchant
class) as an aid to innovation/ pluralistic strength; particularly/ specifically
in Britain- which when their last illusory hope to pass on costs of falling rate
of profit onto American colonists curtailed by American Revolution, had no
choice but to seek an outlet (for its cheap capital) through industrial
development…
Hence the power of the centralising Chinese state, its
strength was also its weakness & WHY China had such a massive
head start on the rest of humanity (so far ahead of it until the 19th
centuary) instead of dominating the world like this preposterous little island
– indeed lacking the strategic imperatives to do so (quite the
reverse ELABORATE); got periodically swallowed up by regional/
social tensions/ decadence (loss of `heavenly mandate’) & corresponding
cylces of renewal (new heavenly mandate/ emperor)
This logic, the need to maintain internal geo pol/econ
equilibrium can best be demonstrated vis the way that prior to the Mongol
invasion, a tendancy to drift to the south left the country prone before the
invader…
…which impact of, even after Mongols decline/ retreat
(Because while it was possible to conquer China on
horseback, to adopt the means to administer it/ avoid losing power, so
tied up Mongols own fighting capacity
that their position so weakened; forced to retreat)
…so affected China’s geo historic memory, that China’s
central geo pol/econ pre-occupation was the maintenance of sufficient internal
equilibrium to fill up its spaces for reasons of security; which meant that the
Chinese state had to keep the power of the merchants in check/ adopt a more
insular geo pol/econ framework, simply to stop itself falling prey to Central
Asian threats (Mongols/ tartars/ Russians)
& this rendered insurmountable the
paradox of its development, that increases in wealth/ productivity, merely fed
through in increases in population – rather than a shift to concentrations of
capital inclined/ compelled to industrial revolution…
…by interstate competition compelling such for sake of
national survival, quite the opposite, Chinese national survival
pointed away from such an approach…
Indeed China victims of their own superiority, as
increased production led to population increases – which led to a
dead end absorbing increased productivity…
range of anti catalytic factors:
Proportionate weakness of
merchants
Lack of interstate
competition generating a symbiotic premium on strategic innovations
with state policy
Insular geo psychology/ geo
imperatives
The vast panoply of anti
catalytic options for solving bottlenecks without radical
innovation (against therefore not generating symbiotic
innovations with state policy)
This
circuitous (defining closed) loop of development defined China until
the opium wars…
…the primary cause of which was Britain’s negative
balance of payments with china, which could only be reversed through the sale
of opium (triangular trade with India/ china/ Britain), which
over an extended timeframe (mid 1820’s – mid 1830’s) actually led
to a silver shortage in China…
As to the Q how on earth was it that the manchus managed
to lose the opium war/ failed to bring adequate forces to bear???
The Chinese became paradoxically victims of their own
superiority…
…as the British haemmoraghed silver in exchange for
Chinese goods, the only way to redress the trade deficit was through the opium
trade…
…this was radically different/ more difficult to long
term penetration of Mughal empire via the silver stream creating culture of
dependency & thus securing a position enabling
British displacement of Mughals
(RE-elaborate)
So, China was more monolithic & the British had no
prior points of penetration; excepting the right to purchase Chinese goods…
However British able to exploit tensions between southern
traders (to gain a foothold) & the central power (the northern originated
manchus)…
…by the time the central power had adequately woken up,
as internal divisions as to how to respond (eg wether to grow the
stuff themselves to redress the silver drain) divided them still
further…
Instructive
as to their paralysis was that they felt it necessary to first prepare the
ground by going after the Chinese opium traders to set the context for a later
showdown with the British
Furthermore China’s (imperial) weight/ strength
paradoxically played against it, was organically employed to undermine it, that
it correspondingly (both) needed to & could not develop the industrial
technologies vis military specialisms (to defeat the British)
This would have required the kind of social pol/econ
configuration that we have seen China could not accommodate to hold itself
together historically as this would require so much power to be given to the
merchant class, creating such imbalances as to render china unviable therefore
China left prone…
& that without such, internal order
raised itself as the greatest factor
Hence the critical point is that the
british had in the preceeding period accumulated enough strength to so
re-inforce their position/ penetration that the weakness of the central
power came into play
& consequently hereonin, the
superiority of British arms was a key factor…
Therefore peasant wars eg Taipeng rebellion
arising out of indirect (or direct) consequance (eg economic fallout from the
silver shortage), also could not bring China’s internal forces/ reserves
to bear…
Q WHY
did previous emperors NOT rely so heavily on the
gentry to defeat peasant insurgencies???
Because such represented a weakening/ evolving
dissolution of the central power…
(&) to re-iterate what made the Taipeng unviable, was
the very processes that gave rise to them…
Eg:
The silver shortage &:
The inability of the Manchu
to stop the silver drain – as previous modalities
of keeping China together mitigated against
the kind of industrial revolution necessary to modernise China’s
antique military machine…
Therefore a frontal assault by the
Taipeng (on the British) unviable
(ELABORATE)
Therefore Manchu could (as
proxy/ comprador forces – anxious to keep the country together – albeit prone
before the unequal treaties – with colonial powers), lean on the
gentry – to hold the centre in immediate term – at cost of fatally weakening
the centre over the longer term…
The continuing inability to fend of encroachment of
imperial powers in turn led to a systemic exhaustion of historical options leading
up to the 1949 takeover…
Beginning with policy of `self strengthening’ which with
the grafting of military/ corresponding heavy industrial technology (dependant
increasingly on the gentry for funds – further weakening the central power
& shifting power towards the regions) onto the old Chinese state…
Correspondingly a quai mystic movement, the Boxer rising targeted foreign infleuences was initially restrained by the Manchus, then allowed to burn itself out to avoid it turning on the Manchu state – its’ failure further (indeed definitively) underscoring the inability of peasant rebellions to renew the state in the old way
…had the inexorable tendancy of providing the powerbase
of a military poltical cadre led by Sun
Yat Sen, seeking to further accelerate industrialisation of China, which as
such led to further strengthening of power of the gentry, to
provide funds for industrialisation – which could only be
undertaken on a regional (as opposed to an all China) basis, led to a peculiar
break up of China into regional warlordisms, yet with fairly
impressive industrial development, rather than disintegratory chaos…
Eg as the old antique Chinese state was
defined more by previous fear of chaos from central Asia/ corresponding need to
maintain internal equillirium than the new wave of colonialism, its break up
while a massive & intolerable blow to China’s sense of itself, did not
decisively hinder development
(an oblique comparison can be drawn between the original
rise of China as a result of its’ earlier break up leading to
rival warlordisms/ techno innovation – which beyond a certain point, China’s
geographic insularity/ the lack of such ongoing rivalry sucking in the whole
world to make its’ internecine strife more efficient …
…resolved itself in re-unification & definition
against barbarian threats to its west…)…
Q WHAT
does this tell us about the apparent paraxdoxical conflict between China’s
national narrative & its process of industrial development???
That the antique Chinese state, having been effectively broken
up by colonial incursion, could not modernise itself by itself,
in a unified way…
& that therefore, it correspondingly
became prone before any passing notion that fed the delusion that it could…
Hence, prone before Britain/ German/ Japan/ America etc,
Chinese nationalists instinctively wanted to use the Soviet Union
to break free/ enable modernisation of their country…
But, this meant the nationalist structures/ frameworks/
infrastrucure that the USSR helped set up because absolutely packed decisively
with USSR agents at the highest levels…
This was a trade…
USSR assistance to build structures that Chinese
nationalism had proven by itself it could not possibly develop, in exchange for
USSR being able to hitch a ride in covert (as opposed to overt
takeover of the Eastern bloc post WWII, OR of openly communist parties) form on
the back of Chinese nationalism…
When the open CCP formations/ allied fractions took a
hammering in 1927, the Chinese nationalists under Chiang kai Sheik looked to
have got the better end of the deal…
But wheras other states balance between
other powers to preserve/ strengthen or defend their centre, it is of key
significance Chinese dependant on USSR to even enable establishment of a
unificatory centre…
Correspondingly & bearing in mind the CCP by Mao’s
admission concentrated against the backdrop of the Japanese invasion, 70% on
trying to secure control of territory, 20% on fighting the nationalists & only
10% on fighting the Japanese (which would give further credence to Hang &
Halliday’s assertion it was a lot less than 10%)…
…the basis of the 1949 takeover was:
Post WWII exhaustion of the
old colonial powers, including reluctance of USA (after Japan) to
in any way get dragged into an Asian land war – which colored their policy vis
China.
The deep penetration of
nationalist forces with CCP/ USSR agents
A (corresponding to the
nebulous agreement with USA reached vis war with Japan & correspondingly vague
notion of USSR’s right of intervention into China) massive Russian invasion
allowing the then rather ropey CCP army formations to regroup in Manchuria
Combo of systematic
corruption in nationalist regime with the feeding of their armies to the CCP by
aforementioned CCP/USSR operatives within said nationalist forces; bringing
about a catastrophic collapse in morale of nationalist forces, a process which
fed of itself – leading to 1949
takeover
& as Chiang Kai Sheik would have been dependant
on colonial aid as vis USSR; there was no such viable animal as Chinese
nationalism, excepting the bizarre terror of Mao, which created a
3rd world nationalist crust/ megastate ideology allowing
capitalism to develop on an all China basis…
So because nobody could impose what they really wanted (&
the culture was too geo politically/ internally crumbly for a negotiated
compromise), everybody got what nobody wanted…
The nationalists/ bourgeois/
gentry (we have seen) were too weak to impose what they wanted – as in hock to
the USSR.
The colonialists could not
impose what they wanted (lacking in
strength/ exhausted).
The peasantry could not even
define what it wanted
The Russians could commit
decisively to effect a change in govt, but could not really impose what they
wanted…
& wheras with every other exotic political figure
(Lenin, DeGaulle, not to mention Hitler or Petain) that appeared
to come from nowhere; there was at least a clear political market for them, so
therefore, chart the reasons for the success of the market (that led to their
advance) & symbiotic evolution) of their fraction, & the rest pretty
much follows from there…
…but mao?
Where was the political market for such a
figure that refused even to obey Stalin???
Not only that, unlike the first 3, Mao had
to trade his wares before anyone was willing to buy such…
So the Q is, WHY did the political market in China not function properly???
Mao’s victory is connected to how the Taipeng lost…
Eg the inherent inflexibility of ancient all
Chinese pol/econ
Eg the heavenly mandate only
applies within the boundaries of the ancient geo pol/econ
modality (which we thought originally, had been resurrected by
colonial weakness/ USSR connexion – on a modified basis)
Therefore a peasant war could NOT
have brought a radical/ reformist govt to power, as it would have collapsed
back into warlordism – without being subordinate
to geo pol connexions to USSR…
Eg peasant war within Chinese megastate too big to be
subordinate, leds back into capitalism &
back into warlordistm & therefore inherently abortive)
Therefore essentially a battle of
colonialisms, in which the CCP prevailed…
WHAT was the difference between India &
China???
(As noted) British imperial legitimacy In India was
defined by default (Indian Communalism) therefore (as noted), Indian
nationalist legitimacy had to define itself in this context against it
(a la Gandhi) in such fashion as avoided communal strife/ (or at
any rate) kept it from destroying everything…
Well, while China’s internal pol/econ agenda was defined
by colonialism, it had no such imperial legitimacy to brace
itself against to define anti imperial legitimacy (peaceful or
violent)…
Correspondingly, in this setting, political natural selection
determined it was less important to actually prepare a movement capable of
seizing power in its own right, than to corral/ secure control of even a
disintegrating political core, with the intention of so directing it to catch
the (eg post WWII Russian) wave capable of propelling it to power…
The
singular defining characteristic of the regime (vis 1949 takeover) was a kind
of creative destruction…
…The
economic, cultural & above all geo psychological destruction of the old political
economic ways, vis the subordination of the economy to the goal of the
`suprpower program’, to both blackmail USSR into giving it the requisite
technology (thence dragging it into war over Taiwan) & paying for such with
super exploitation of the peasantry…
…the
attempt to accelerate such in defiance of econ physiological reality/
(immediate) potentiality through the `great Leap forward’, ending (aided by
Vietnam war enabling recapturing of agenda by Mao) with the `Cultural
revolution’…
…a general mobilisation (from above by Mao) of
sections of civil society against the party & indeed itself…
…which
both exhausted the residual potential to retain control through
terror alone…
(hence
also rapproachment with USA – even though this was inevitably
aimed as being another alternative source of weapons technology)
&
yet, so seared that terror into the mindset of China, that it has increasingly
enabled capitalism to develop within a socialist infrastructural/ 3rd
world national liberationist ideological framework…
Indeed
the effectiveness of this logic is best illustrated by
the Tianenmen Square massacre in 1989 in which 4000 students massacred…
Originally a protest vis corruption vis the collapse of
the 2 price system (as result of the rising power of the capitalist sector
eclipsing the socialised sector), against the effect (if not
explicitly against) expanding capitalism eclipsing the `iron rice bowl’ &
supported by bourgeois seeking more freedom/ room for manoeuvre…
It was necessary for the CCP to restore order for
capitalism, to enable its continuing development under the ideological cover of
the 3rd world nationalist conception – in turn econ growth (based on
USA trade deficit) providing sufficient basis to stabilise regime over an
extended timeframe…
Q But WHY
is capitalism able to rule in its own name in India (even though in so doing,
it will blow the state to smithereens) but not at all in China???
It is the very fractured aspect of India itself (its
tendancy to blow itself to kingdom come) that enabled Britain to
gain a foothold/ colonise India vis imperial legitimacy…
…which in turn functioned as a brace enabling
anti colonial legitimacy to define itself against such & correspondingly,
enabling capitalism to rule in its own name, but (as increasingly seen
as the enemy of its own people as it develops – vis megastate
logic) blows itself apart as it increasingly does so…
…we have elaborated earlier on how such be
resolved
(RE-ELABORATE)
Wheras it is because China is in many respects still
prone to sink back into the old ancient insular mode (&
corresponding oblivion) – without the CCP authoritarianism/
terror
(see the anti Japan riots as proof of this generally unstable tendancy – a manifestation of the fact that the rise of capitalism beyond a certain point posits it as the principle/ most visible enemy of its own people)
…which leads to collapse of Chinese capitalism…
Such that the only way to stabilise china
vis solar powered desalination…
Requiring a transitional nuclear shotgun wedding
between state / civil society UNTIL solar powered desalination
makes china the global sheet anchor of individual liberty/ pooled sovereignty/
socialist finance hegemony/ culture of common threats/ objectives confronting
all humanity stabilised via Universalist Conception…
Syllogistics
we
are politically bankrupt & correspondingly morally delegitimised as a
result of our earlier failure to spot (know at all about) Russian invasion as a
decisive factor in the 1949 Maoist takeover…
BUT, we are politically resurrected via
USA iran war/ destruction of the dome of the rock eg overt manifestaion of USA
bombworshippers
Therefore the Q arises HOW does the latter tally with the
former & WHY???
Well, this is confirmed because everyone will know what the game is & be
overtly hungry/ desperate for a gameplan
that trades of all self evidevetly manifest apocalyptic threats against each
other…
…& thence Q arises, HOW did we get into this nightmare,
& the crude/
finetuneable answer be logically reverse engineerable for the logic of the gameplan required; & correspondingly why it could not be deployed either…
Well that’s just dandy, but WHY did we not spot this factor???
(eg also
elaborate on the Pakistan/ India Q)
The idea of asking the Q was 1949
actually (a revolution) an authentic peasant war, simply never occurred to me to ask…
Eg vis a country historically
obsessed with the heavenly mandate (& corresponding peasant wars in pre
colonial times), the cautious/ conservative interpretation was that post WWII,
as the colonial powers weakened, china
simply reverted to type with a modified ideological crust that however defined
the regime as less insular than before, even
if this was merely expressed in a stream of coarse ideological invective
to confer on itself historic/ political/ narrative legitimacy…
(as can be seen in Vol I Chapter 7
& Vol II Chapter 2 of `Substance Over Form’)
…& as to the Q then how on earth does my entire work not
collapse into ashes, I can only erspond, that as can see throughout this work,
that the evolution of this work is defined/ led principally by the anomalies that have to be
addressed to get this work (the operational gameplan) just about good enough to
serve as the starting point from which humanity can begin to get on top of the
unflding apocalyptic geo pol/con chaos…
That as it was only when the operational
gameplan could
comprehend China, that we could address ourselves to the global peasant war
& contrast it
with the earlier crisis of slavery, that I then had & could meaningfully deal with
this Q & its implications in more depth…
…time being at a premium, & the
priority always being to remain sufficiently flexible in approach to be able to
anticipate/ spot/ respond to the decisive flaw/ anomaly, that will compel the
next paradigm/ re-engineering of my work…
…so that it can/ will be just about
good enough to serve as the starting point for humanity to get on top of the
aforementioned chaos…
The Global Peasant War (part 2)
For as well as vis technology, the message/ means
used organically to control the global peasantry vis modern media/market
forces, means the global peasantry now has a global reach/
impact, which has to be taken notice of…
…wheras before, at both the progressive
& reactionary levels, there were entire social bulwarks/ classes acting as
buffers between the imperial metropolitan core & the great mass of global
humanity…
…by (organically) appealing directly to the
global people (over the heads of their rulers progressive & reactionary)
the USA led imperial metropolitan core has become much more of a direct
target, has destroyed the old geo pol/econ buffers between (USA
led) metropolitan core & the 3rd world…
Eg if the FMLN/ FSLN failed to resist USA tyranny in El
Salvador/ Nicaragua, who cares? Just hop over the Mexican border into the USA…
Pissed off with the way your country is as a result of
your previous Islamic fascists anti communist alliance with the USA? Sick of their
smug burger munching faces on your TV everyday? Its not your fault, so just
blow the mothers away a la Sept 11th…
…Or if you are feeling generous, just blow up an oil
pipeline & let them walk their fat arses off…
&
this mortal peril, rather than chastening USA imperial hubris, renders it more
explosive in its laager psychology. Though the point would have to be conceded,
that any failure to check USA imperial hubris leads to an apocalyptic
nuclear expansionist decadence/ tailspin in any case.
Indeed
as noted earlier, Sept 11th actually stabilised USA geo pol/econ
psychology, for a period, by preventing (shifting focus from) scandals vis
Enronisation of the entire geo pol/econ gaining their own critical momentum…
& as the essence of the global peasant war is the
power to challenge/ even break the (USA led) metropolitcan core without
itself being able to consolidate a new/ alternative geo pol/econ centre
of gravity; the proliferation of WMD…
USA threatens China, China goes
nuclear, India responds likewise, Pakistan follows & trades spare parts to
fund its own program…
…must also be considered part of the global
peasant war
(moreover,
we have already seen how/ why China/ India cannot, as megastates, take over
from USA as imperial leaders of the military plutocratic system – so that
insofaras they are part of the metropolitan core, they are on basis of
war/ finance nexus, even more so part of the 3rd world)
Eg both because USA’s attempts (aided by
threat of its own 10,000 nukes) to deliberately retard countries development
(so as to prevent them even having the capacity to develop their own WMD
programs) feeds inexorably into (global) revanchist sentiment AND
because this consequent imbalance is an additional factor meaning the geo
pol/econ cost of WMD development is so great that such become the innate focus
of the state political psychology (of course, for such not to be
hindered, would mean the `effortless’ acquisition of WMD would both encourage
others to commit themselves & lead to general quantative
& qualitative proliferation of WMD)…
…& were we not already heading for such, this USA
drive for `full spectrum dominance’ would be the primary cause for global econ
collapse…
Which brings us to the next factor, the failure of the
info revolution to either automatically enable a post military
plutocratic order, or prevent the collapse of the military
plutocratic system…
For inevitably the (character of the) info revolution was
shaped by the inevitable rise of global finance beyond the
control of any nation state…
…as a tool to assist this process…
& yet the information revolution has
made the old repressive military plutocratic state (its machinery), ever
increasingly unviable (as a means to retain control – even briefly) – even as
it grasps impotently for more power it withers away – without
automatically giving rise to a new post military plutocratic order…
Eg for while the info revolution was self evidently integral
to the breaking of the power of (generally parochial) organised labor – it
nevertheless armed to the teeth the very sam people, as a potential
global civil society…
Not so much as workers, still less as consumers, but rather
as thinking humans – held together by the culture of the common threats/
objectives confronting all humanity – the chief objective being to gain control
of our own time, to not only master all threats to our survival but universal
time itself…
But paradoxically, to awaken/ enable global civil society
to so mobilise itself, the revanchist 3rd world fascists had
to be the initial beneficiaries to help re-animate people in the
process of the collapse/ breaking of the old centre BEFORE the Revolution could
fill the breech & establish the new centre of gravity (eg vis
the aforementioned Nuclear Shotgun Wedding)…
The key here is a general unwillingness to die in
strategic battles of for the interests of our elites & how
this reshapes the psycho political battlefield – that the raising of the
perceived price of blood, vis the 3rd world, is precisely what
makes us weak before asymmetric warfare…
…& (paradoxically) gives them the techno
advantage
eg as our lopsided/ top heavy techno configuration is turned
against us (never mind also by spread of disease from impoverished 3rd
world overwhelming the metropole) & not just (though as well by) Al Qaeda’s
diffuse cyber model…
even though their `victory’ leads to the destruction of
the very technologies that enable them to wage their campaign (leading to
descent into primal panic/ chaos etc)…
As well as the
aforementioned geo pol/econ framework
& a techno model based
on riding the shockwave…
As the revanchist technical model is based entirely on
our weakness, which above & beyond everything else is based on short
termist geo pol/econ strategic / historical thinking…
…(elaborate especially vis suppot for Islamic fascists,
leading also to apocalyptic demographics deepening the apocalyptic psychology)
Our hitherto failure to enlist support of the 3rd
world UNTIL driven to desperation to do so…
The hitherto root of our failure here lies in our
hitherto failure to view everything in terms of DEEP TIME & that the
solution to this lies in understanding:
Unstable security of supply of key resources
(especially oil/ energy)
The death of hope in the 3rd world as a
result of a number of factors, most prominent being:
Rigged patterns of trade………….
Legacy of imperial/ deomestic reactionary axis;
producing also psycho political transference vis Islamic fascism
The refusal to acknowledge their part in trashing
their countries in alliance with USA empire, causing them to seek to absolve themselves
of all responsibility for such via an increasingly toxic revanchist ideology.
Including repression of women, giving rise to catastrophic birth rates
entrenching poverty feeding further laager psychology/ psycho political
transference at all levels of society
The fact that in certain areas of the world, eg
Africa, the sheer geographic vastness/ impenetrability, means the whole world
(to develop such) must proceed beyond imperial consumptive patterns of
development (indeed as we shall see later exploit the chaos arising from geo
pol/econ breakdown in order to develop the political will) to develop the solar
powered desalinatory technology that enables the scale of the undertaking to be
accomplished (by strengthening the basic socio econ unit as a freestanding unit
largely self sufficient in water, energy & access to info.
6 The
Paradoxes of the Human Soul
We have seen (in previous volumes - including `Intro to
Quantum Materialism') that:
Everyone from the beginning of time knows at least 2
things. That a geo pol/econ system based on inequality (war/ finance nexus)
crashes into ashes somewhere down the line (even if with no
knowledge of capitalist longwave cycles, they do not know where/ how/ when)....
...and secondly that a system based on equality as
an end in itself is the most unstable system of all (as
lacks a general stabilising/ organising principle that binds productive/ state
bodies together - such as the war/ finance nexus).
So the Q reduces
itself to how is equality to be stabilised?
Now we have seen how we can exploit the common threats/
objectives confronting all humanity (`The Power & the Glory’ Chapter 6 of
`Intro to Quantum Materialism') to stabilise a geo pol/econ based on equality
(to enable education of humanity sufficient to deal with such threats)....
....& we have seen how (now that war/finance nexus no
longer able to reconfigurate itself in response to a radical shock) we can exploit
the unfolding collapse of the military plutocratic system, the terror that this
engenders, to propel a global rev reconstructionist framework as the antidote (held
together by common threats/ objectives confronting all humanity),
A (this military plutocratic) military geo political
economic security framework/ system, based on 20,000 nukes/ warheads chasing
1/2 teaspoon of smallpox, is self evidently unviable...
...we need 3rd world radicals to be our security, but
this can only come about when we have eliminated the (USA led) financial/
military power configuration that sponsored 3rd world fascists (Bin Laden/
Saddam Hussein & other such) originally to crush the radicals threatening
its' imperial interests.
UNTIL then, the core elite's `realistic' approach
will strengthen the `realistic resistance' (to USA imperium) of Islamic (&
other 3rd world) fascists, in turn fuelling a `realistic backlash' from white
classical fascists, & the descent into anarchy...
(Though) Paradoxically, it is only as the cauldron
boils over, that it be possible to launch a new operationally globalised
movement (from Britain):
Mobilising Asian women (as a tactical reserve)
against both white classical fascists & Islamic fascists (should they resist
such, if they do not, they will lose all power by default) - cutting the ground
politically from under white classical fascists...
...using nuke disarmament as an aggressive
political weapon to cut the ground from under USA Caesarism (enabling
its overthrow) - enabling via the diaspora, Pakistani radicals to use nuke
disarmament to marginalise (in power) Hindu fascism in India/ enable its
overthrow...
& consolidated with WARTIME econ
sacrifices for global reconstruction - held together by the common threats/
objectives confronting all humanity; & everyone's fear for everyone else's
children......
....to effect the quantum metamorphosis from war/ finance
nexus, to a geo pol/econ where global civil society has hegemony over finance,
& is held together by overarching common threats/ objectives confronting
all humanity....
But, we have not yet dealt with the
(fallout from the) paradoxes of the human soul, including the Great
Existential Paradox, that:
....charity begins at home AND
charity begins with preventing the nuclear annihilation of humanity, (that) both concepts clash AND
yet ultimately depend on each other (a clash of realities that
renders every soul somewhat mangled).....
& this we will need to do in order to understand how
best to work with key geo cultural pivots emerging from these paradoxes
(from beginning of time), to enable the Revolution to slow down
the apocalyptic (geo pol/econ) impulses for long enough, to enable the logic of
the core paradox:
....that
the USA led military plutocratic elite depend on the Revolution to seize power
(from the war/ finance nexus/ machine they are the gilded slaves of), to save
their (everyone's) children: & that the Revolution (to avoid global
annihilation) is dependant on this factor & must tailor its entire military
pol/econ framework accordingly....
...to kick in....
(So) we need to
firstly understand something about proto history (before
the war/ finance nexus was established/ consolidated). & also at the end,
to put everything in its ultimate context, the period of development after
`Valhalla on Earth', as intelligent life becomes God - moves `Beyond Terror'
(of course there is a lot of overlap between all 4 of these epochs).
....The foundation of the paradoxes of the human soul is
that consciousness emerged out of dust.
We sought/ seek to understand ourselves, our world our
creator & the first
great (series) event is that we are enslaved by the first really great
machine of our own creation, the war/ finance nexus....
Beyond a certain point, the land (`natural economy')
could not support a rising population.
Thence it becomes necessary both to resort
(beyond an episodic/ incipient level) to settled agriculture (to feed rising
population); and also (to defend both the natural resources of
the land & its husbanded agricultural base which necessitated) the
development (beyond
an episodic/ incipient level) of
a war economy, war technology (increasingly metallurgy), which further
drove economic & technological development....
An emergent war/ finance nexus (increasing
circulation of means of exchange, especially gold/ silver, acceptable across
incipient state boundaries between allies & adversaries alike) breaking
up the earlier protohistoric economy (which tends very
much to be under-rated in it's technical sophistication) as it dictated the
social pol/econ agenda internally (within each emerging proto state construct)
and externally by setting the agenda for patterns of trade &
military pol/econ alliances....
....(&) we have seen that the end
result (of evolution of the war/ finance nexus) is the core paradox:
....that the USA led military plutocratic
elite depend on the Revolution to seize power (from the war/ finance nexus/
machine they are the gilded slaves of), to save their (everyone's) children:
& that the Revolution (to avoid global annihilation) is dependant on this
factor & must tailor its entire military pol/econ framework accordingly....
....(but) before & now is the Great Existential
Paradox:
....that charity begins at home AND charity
begins with preventing the (nuclear) annihilation of humanity, (that) both concepts clash AND
yet ultimately depend on each other.....
...Which primal angst at guilt of which, also feeds into
the fear/ philosophy of hell; which stood in for the (then historically
unripe) core paradox as a cypher. And the philosophy of hell
derivative
of fears of the Great Existential Paradox, that such is unresolvable UNTIL
the (historically ripened) Core Paradox enables their general
resolution; that we are responsible for the guilt accruing from either
our sins against society or family, & as we cannot serve both we will face
hideous consequences either way. Especially as without the
(historically ripened) Core Paradox, we cannot help but sin against humanity
anyway, as our poor Bolshevik ancestors discovered.
.... is organically hijacked by incipient
elites in order (as a precondition) to retain control....
....So the Great Existential Paradox actually functions organically
as a weapon of choice for the war/ finance nexus, at least until eclipsed
by the core paradox, enabling the worst most tortuous features of the
Great Existential paradox to be institutionally overcome....
Now the 2 dimensional (anthropomorphic) God concept, the
idea that `man was created in God's image' (certainly common to Judaeo/
Christian/ Islamic traditions & logical default undercurrent
in others)....
....clashes with (& undermines) understanding of
existential dialectics (& paradoxes of the human soul) which are based
on the fact that human soul was not created (fully
formed) by a deity but emerged out of dust....
The Mind of God
As to the Q `if there is a God why is there so much suffering in the world? And HOW can you claim as you do, that vis Christianity/ Islam etc, there WAS (& IS) a manifestation of a God dialectic, yet SUBORDINATE to the hegemony of matter over consciousness? HOW can God allow itself to be arsed about in this unholy fashion?'
Consciousness springs forth from (cosmic) dust (not even shit), & through an accretion of knowledge (aided by supra reserve of courage - vis the new rev theory & its deployment), a super criticality is attained, enabling (through martyrs sacrifice/ re-inforcement- as the sun gives life to the earth) the hegemony of consciousness over matter to arise & humanity to become God.
But you cannot point to as direct conclusive proof of God's existence the wonder `miracle' of nature in say, a leaf or tree (nature - eg the oft phrase `...isn't life miraculous? A God MUST have made it.'). For such an approach leads down the road of projecting a vision of an ALL controlling deity, every action/ event etc the product of an enslaved/ enslaving fatalism - rather than ultimate control of process, through aiding (via supra reserve of courage) human consciousness/ knowledge to attain (through exercise of FREE WILL) hegemony over matter - as an independent FREE entity/ agency (rather than the sordid plaything of a celestial Saddam Hussein).
Creation (the act of) was a work of art NOT of science.
Scientific knowledge/ consciousness grows out of it as an independent agency, drawing on the supra reserve of courage to enable it to attain hegemony over matter. And so thence become God, replicating the process. Art thence remains WITHIN this consciousness, the ultimate flowering (via scientific knowledge) of art.
Such be the dialectic of the Philosophical Revolution, that must (further) jet fuel the struggle for intelligent life/ consciousness to gain hegemony over matter/ freeing itself once & for all from the primordial sludge....
For
God, Commonwealth & Freedom...
Doubtless many classical
materialists will accuse the author of a brutal re-working of the `Jesus wants
me for a sunbeam' theme. The only response possible to this is to refer all
suchlike back to the subsection (`Holy War?' Chapter 1 Vol I of S.O.F.) on the
clash between the communist view of death & the fascist view
of death.
It was not Marxism's atheism which caused
its' ineffectualness. But rather its' operational ineffectualness
(-subordinated to capitalist hegemony as elaborated) which was the foundation
of its' atheism (though still philosophically, an advance on the
anthropocentric God concepts which preceded it).
Simply, Marxism did not possess the
operational theory/weaponry which needed a (general) martyr driven means of
propagation - which in turn requires the God dialectic.
Nor indeed could it possess this
theory before all potential for automatic development had been exhausted -
causing FREE WILL to be raised from a secondary factor, to the PRINCIPLE factor
of historical development - that shall decide the fate of humanity - in the era
of global finance hegemony & decomposition.
....& this (anthropomorphic God) concept has a
symbiotic relationship with the Great Existential Paradox, in that the
philosophy of hell (the aforementioned cypher for the historically unripe Core
Paradox & derivative of fears from the Great Existential Paradox)
is ripe for priestification. & if you (appear to) control the gates of
heaven & hell, you have political control; until the core
paradox historically ripens.
UNTIL then, free will/ consciousness is
subordinate to hegemony of matter over consciousness (war/ finance nexus over civil society).
The most noteworthy primordial
manifestation (of this subordination of consciousness to matter) being the
legend of the `The Fall’… that (as) even, especially the light
bearer (`Lucifer’) was cast out for rebelling against God (vis encouraging man
to seek independant knowledge of good & evil), that demonstrably humanity
cannot save itself by its own autonomous revolutionary
initiative, but must instead wait for external divine intervention… this legend
is the geo psycho political caldera of the entire
Judaeo – Christian – Islamic world. & (as noted throughout S.O.F.; but
especially Vol III) it is in this geo psycho political setting that the fate of
all humanity will be decided more than anywhere else in the context of the unfolding
global pol/econ implosion of the war/ finance nexus.
..... that in order to
physically as well as intellectually preserve/ restore/ extend light in both
forms (electrical & intellectual), humanity must exploit the chaos/ fear
engendered by the final collapse of military plutocratic system to push a rev
geo pol/econ framework (which we outlined in `Communique Number 1' in
`Lucifer2.zip'- refer back to as required, or wait until we include text of
said communique shortly) enabling it to gain hegemony over its own
creation (consciousness gaining hegemony over matter...) vis culture of common
threats/ objectives confronting all humanity (especially in immediate term, to
develop sustainable energy sources - aided by civil society control of finance/
its own creation - humanity no longer subordinate to the war/ finance
nexus)....
The very beginings of this new
pol/econ culture are to be found in the hope that comes from the
beginnings of a viable strategy/ methodolgy to deal with said apocalyptic threats
- under pressure of said threats. Representing the pivotal point in history,
the precise point at which human consciousness begins to assert its
hegemony over matter/ finance/ its' own creation (hence to name `Lucifer2.zip'
- an aggressive refusal to submit to our primordial original fear - expressed
in the legend of `The fall', but to exploit the chaos to seize command of our
own destiny (we examine the strategic role of the cultural co-option of
Christian/ Islamic/ Jewish etc imagery in Chapter 2 of `Intro to Quantum
Materialism' - contained in `Lucifer2.zip').
....to break our own programming
& seize command of our own destiny (through the methods outlined in `Communique Number 1' in
`Lucifer2.zip'- refer back to as required)
B Towards the Grand Unified Theory/ Process
(2)
(To start with the basics) Vis free will & its
limitations, we can discount as self evidantly wrong the popular (scientific)
notion of a universe `for every possible outcome (of every event)'...
Eg (routine examples given) that Hitler won WWII or
Napoleon won before him (which impossible
`possibilities' - we have already disposed of by explaining how/ why
these unstable inherently hyper-inflationary plundering wannabee Caesarisms
could not consolidate viable centres of geo pol/econ gravity under any
eventuality whatever).
For aside from the historic limits of free will
already outlined (that only when war/ finance nexus/ hegemony of
matter over consciousness no longer able to reform itself in response to a
radical shock - is free will a decisive historic factor) it is not
only (according to this logic) the major events that require a universe (of
their very own for each possible outcome); but every possible outcome of every
decision however trivial (eg wether I scratch my balls with my left hand or my
right, wether or not I scratch my arse instead & for how long/ what minute
of what hour & again or not at any given moment of any given day - &
the same for everyone indeed every living organism of every species on every planet,
from the beginning of time - don't even get me started on the Q of which random
sperm fertilises which random egg to produce which random being.... & the
knock on effects).
Free will therefore has its limitations. It only
becomes a decisive historic factor under certain conditions.... eg (vis
immediate pre revolution) when war/ finance nexus (military plutocratic
machine) no longer able to reform itself (in response to a radical shock) - as
already outlined - whence the core paradox ripens.
But also when capacity exists (eg from 1950's onwards) to
destroy the world, the officers of the war/ finance nexus, have to not
summon up decisive impulse (yes I know the aforementioned USS Liberty
plot was an extremely close call) to trigger
all out oblivion (prioritise their children instead).
This in essence is free will's negative
manifestation. A useful phenonemon (yet) still entirely consistent with
hegemony of matter over consciousness....
Aside from this, the phenonemon of free will is particular
not general. Eg a West African
coca slave can use their ingenuity to become a slaveholder instead. But
possesses no levers to overthrow the entire geo pol/econ (military plutocratic)
system of which this slavery (via neo colonial cash crop dependancy) is but a
very small cog.
Inequality/ tyranny can be passed of onto others, but as
seen (noted as an organic process) the hegemony of matter over consciousness
will always maintain itself for as long as political economic
inertia benefits a decisive minority of humanity....
....only when instability becomes (so)
general does free will cease being (pro-actively) particular & instead
becomes (pro-actively) general...
& it is as a result of this fragmented free will
producing fragmentation of consciousness that produces (the)
existential paradoxes (of the human soul) we have already examined....
Q Are free
will & consciousness one & the same thing?
This implies they are (that it is) latent within all
matter (which is certainly no more than entirely consistent with everything
else) right down to the smallest subatomic particle...
....& yet (as already seen), it is constraints
on free will (including death, as we shall see later) that impose
patterns of order, that enable free will to develop/ ripen/
amount to a hegemonic factor...
...eg without such, humanity (the potential
of intelligent life) would destroy/ abort itself (its potential) before
it ripened....
(eg if cavemen had nuclear weapons).
There is (must be therefore) a universal framework that
means we are constrained from knowing any given thing before we
are ready to (at least begin to) absorb the consequances of that knowledge....
(random
external threats like asteroid strikes etc notwithstanding - the point is that
on some planets free will/ intelligent life can develop/ gain
hegemony over matter)
....at least at a general level....
Death forces intelligent life to project itself, its
ideas far beyond itself.... to value its soul, its learning/ knowledge beyond
its existing corporeal form....
We dealt with this (in Vol II of S.O.F. - The God
dialectic - The Immortality of the Idea') earlier; but death per se
(so) focuses the mind, & this is what makes our rev framework
viable....
Death prevents matter running amok, maintaining (the)
incipient (especially supra) universal hegemony of consciousness
over matter....
....paradoxically therefore, it is precisely in death
that is to be found our hope & gaurentor against absolute universal
horror....
By embracing death therefore, to resist the
threat of global annihilation & vis new rev theory), we invoke
this hope....
and yet.... while death/ martyrdom serves as a vehicle
for such before & after (the sacrifice) the event, the event itself (the
point of transition & especially familial shockwaves) is so sordid it
renders a neccessary conceit, all hopes super-imposed over it
even as it (helps) realise such....
How can this be so???
Because while it is (obviously) the negation of life,
most brutally for those close to; in a structurally insane world
hurtling towards destruction, it is (clearly) the only way to resist the
ultimate madness/ oblivion.... of everything, all humanity/ it's soul....
Indeed ALL death per se (as well as rev sacrifice) is a neccessary
conceit because it represents the (transient? I know not...)
destruction of a living manifestation of free will in order to
enable (the) fruition of free will per se.
All is
passd on through knowledge anyway, upon which others in turn build... in this
is to be found the expression of free will- consciousness (albeit circumscribed
by said material- historical boundaries) which enables successor generations,
including our successors to build... we are all the progeny of God, yet all the
progeny of humanity....
But why is death a conceit, creation so
imperfect???
What is the role of this neccessary
imperfection???
Why does humanity(?) &/ or God(?) need
for creation to be imperfect???
Because without imperfection, intelligent life/
new cosmic generation (new god) would have no independance, would
in effect merely be the same deity (spiritual masturbation)...
Therefore, if God needs a soulmate (of whatever
description) or just simply to create for its own sake, this is the only way...
This still does not answer the Q, how did
this all begin, vis first cosmic generation (eg `where did the first god come
from?'). & I (still) surmise we will only get the answer when we both need
it & are ready to absorb its consequances...
...& quite probably the answer as to why
creation was created is bound up to the answer to this Q....
....which in turn is almost certainly bound up with (can
only be discovered by) development of a
culture developing (beyond even culture of common threats/ objectives
confronting all humanity/ human survival) beyond terror, beyond individual
planetary parochialism.... the beginnings of the process of intelligent life
becoming God.
But to illustrate the boundaries of what can immediately
be deduced from what we can gather (so far), we can take things a litte further
before we come up against what (I think) are (immediately, that is temporary)
insurmountable barriers (wether just this side of the Revolution, or
progress made further down the line on basis of common threats/ objectives
confronting all humanity or, less likely, until we are ready to begin said
process of intelligent life becoming God)....
C Time, Consciousness & Free will
The (mainly negative) evidence (outlined) for existence
of a deity corresponds to 2 further conclusions
That a God enabled
creation (as outlined), makes the deity Lord (creator) of (universal) time.
That as intelligent life
(which emerged out of dust as an independant entity) can gain mastery over itself,
become God (with the aid of the supra reserve of courage of God); intelligent
life while currently subject to the logic of the Lord of Time, can gain control
of (universal) time per se (vis
consciousness gaining hegemony over universe per se)...
...that (correspondingly) not just consciousness &
free will; but time, consciousness & free will are one & the
same....
So the `struggle for an economy of time' posited by Marx
(yes, yes I know...); is the longstanding essence of struggle of consciousness
to gain hegemony over matter....
....it is as much part of the universal(ist) constitution
as the fragmentation of power is. Indeed the 2 symbiotically re-enforce /
enable each other (& indeed are one & the same)...
From this, we can further extrapolate that control of
time is the pivot upon which all hinges.
At the most basic (planetary) level, to enable humanity
to gain the knowledge neccessary to confront common threats/ objectives
(confronting all humanity), humanity must gain control of its own creation (make
finance work for civil society - instead of remain slaves of the first great
machine humanity ever made, the war/ finance nexus, which would mean
oblivion...)
...but beyond this... beyond parochial planetary
concerns, as it is neccessary to connect with other planetary civilisations to
deal with threats too vast to confront at the (mere) planetary level, the
(drive for) acquisition of knowledge as an end in itself, must transcend even
the culture of the common threats to humanity's existence; as a precondition to
enable humanity to deal with such threats...
...human consciousness (all intelligent life) therefore,
must finally resolve our violent relationship with God by becoming not just
masters of our own creation - of time in this context - but masters of God's
creation, of universal time itself....
This implies (as a first major step) a fusion of natural
science with a `parascience' (enabling for example thought projection across
planets)
If the present condition of such (parasciences) inspire
zero or (at best) near zero confidence, remember the universal (constitutional)
principle that we can only begin to acquire any part of knowledge when we are
ready to at least begin to absorb the consequances of that knowledge. So it is
hardly surprising that we cannot (yet) remove the safety locks on this tool,
when we are still making such arses of ourselves with the primitive nukes.
But remember, God's creation/ universal constitution
automatically prevents universal horror, eg `devils' emerging (this is the
function of death - which prevents matter/ any emergent living entity running
amok on a universal scale/ beyond the limits of plantery destruction). Hitler
etc was no `devil', not even a lord of death, but just a dogsbody of death,
glorified playground bullies - indeed the threats we face now, of oblivion, are
no graver than that required to stimulate humanity (if it so exercises its'
free will) to establish constitutional control of its own creation - rather
than remain as slaves of the war/ finance nexus (leading to oblivion)....
The paradox then is that humanity is dependant on God, to
enable it to master itself, & yet, the constitution must be secular.
Q. How to
resolve?
The written secular constitution is aimed
at civil society control of our own time/ creation (rather than remain slaves
of the war/ finance nexus)...
The unwritten universal constitution is (as
outlined) indispensible for enabling humanity to execute the written secular
constitution (eg via supra reserve of courage)...
But wheras the written secular constitution is purely/
simply about enabling free will (humanity to acquire time/ space to think/
confront common threats/ objectives - instead
of remain slaves of war/ finance nexus), removing such constraints that
generally abort it...
...the unwritten universal constitution, can only be
built upon free will per se (eg as noted Time, Consciousness & Free Will
are one & the same - that God's creation of time, was the supreme act of
free will)...
...To introduce any aspect of compulsion therefore,
whatsoever (to even the tiniest degree) is not to extend/ develop humanity's
control/ ownership/ takeover of the unwritten constitution, it is merely to
bang one's head against its' childproof locks...
D Conscious Gravity & Time - Space
Of course, in order to gain/ stabilise control of our own
creation, we must gain mastery of God's.
We can see that creation is a kind of program
which requires (the) freewill that emerges from within it to gain
hegemony over process & program, for it to actually be successful
(intelligent life gain mastery of itself).
It also contains for us a guide principle that (with the
collapse of the war/ finance nexus centre of geo pol/econ gravity) all
(societal/ developmental) decisions must be taken on basis of whatever on
balance best serves freewill...
To re-iterate God's creation/ universal constitution
automatically prevents universal horror, eg `devils' emerging (this is the
function of death - which prevents matter/ any emergent living entity running
amok on a universal scale/ beyond the limits of planetry destruction).
...not just at the individual level, but at the level of
any state/ corp entity, where its' own material existence takes precedence over
all other people(s)/ latent potential for (general) development - especially on
the basis of primacy of knowledge accumalation (eg vis common threats/
objectives confronting all humanity)...
This `supra death'....
- which
we have seen played out in partial form over the previous capitalist longwave
cycles; & which now (there is no potential for reform/ reconfiguration of
the war/ finance nexus, as no single military plutocratic state is strong
enough to lead this process by itself...) has reached the terminal stage...
....can best be termed conscious gravity.
As just as there is a maximum height for any mountain on
any planet....
...before it collapses generally then absolutely
under its own gravity (as with the Himalayas - vis the Tibetan Plateau), or conversely
(as with smaller planet Mars - with its dead, cold, exhausted core -
producing volcanic mountain Olympus Mons - 3 times the size of Everest), all
further growth is curtailed by the fact that an exhausted internal
pressure cannot push further out in defiance of its' own gravity...
....So there is a maximum Himalayan height for the
speculative plunder of the military plutocratic state/ system ....
....its'
paradoxical ability to grow aided by partial free will of a minority whilst
(said war/ finance nexus) holding hostage all human survival, & (with it of
course) so repressing free will in general per se (as noted the new security
architecture must be based on regearing the entire geo pol/econ to the culture
of common threats/ objectives confronting all humanity - establishing the
cultural primacy of knowledge accumalation to confront said threats over
military plutocratic hegemony)...
...before the hegemony of matter over
consciousness (of finance over civil
society) collapses under its own unsustainable dead weight; & free
will becomes the decisive factor...
The corrolary of (the negative factor of) conscious
gravity is the concept of time - space
(eg as we
have demonstrated that time/ consciousness & free will are one & the
same from both the standpoint of the
creator & created, time- space represents the copntrol an
individual/ civil society has individually/ collectively over time - to control
said individual's/ humsnity's destiny - within a given spatial area/ context)
...eg the primal attraction of property is the desire to
own time - space...
...as a means of accruing independance/ control from/
over nature & other people - which paradoxically however (inexorably,
beyond a certain point) ends up (generally indirectly) enslaving
the owner as well as wider society (to the hegemony of the war/ finance nexus
over civil society)...
...unless
it is aimed (& successfully) at securing an expansion of the
same for the rest of civil society...
Eg this is the principle of inversion, that
attempts to appropriate an excess of time - space (for oneself at
other's expense on balance; or not on balance to the benefit of wider humanity) lead (generally indirectly) to becoming beholden to
the hegemony of your own (finance - via the entrenched hegemony of
the apocalyptically decomposing war/ finace nexus) matter over your own consciousness...
...a manifestation of conscious gravity at
the molecular/ micro level...
This micro level manifestation (vis limits of free will),
has it's corrollary at the macro level in that .....
Humanity is long familiar with concepts of
`decadence' and of power elites that exhaust all their ingenuity/ time/
resources on holding what they have. & (even) with their intellects
partially lobotomised, because the logic of such prevents them countenancing
anything different...
...but with the contempory USA in particular (this is
NOT to exonerate anyone else) we see this taken to a new
extraordinary/ manifestly terminal extent...
...at the level of both the people as
well as the elite...
At the level of the USA people, there is simply a
huge market for (distractional short attention span based) stupidity. They know
enough to know they don't really want to know anymore. They don't want
knowledge that places them under obligations to act differently/ endure
sacrifices/ pool sovereignty/ confront head on their own bullying imperial apocalyptic
parochialisms.
This empire likes things kept simple -
hence the phenonemal paradox of the world's most technologically developed
state, yielding ever more ground to Bible based creationism - increasingly
given parity with evolution in USA schools - aided by Presidential endorsement
of said parity)
....The litmus test for this is Cuba.
It cannot (pre geo military pol/econ
meltdown) be acknowledged that crimes committed by USA imperium against Cuba
are by far & away the single biggest factor that warps the character of the
Cuban state....
...for it cannot end there. Every other USA geo
pol/econ power crime would have to be
admitted such as would demand (not reperations but) a painful revolutionary recasting of the USA itself, to fit in
with the imperatives of a single global pol/econ constitutional framework...
...only the crash will (with USA
citizens fears for safety of their own children) put this on the agenda...
But it is at the level of the USA elite that we see
the full power of conscious gravity...
...an elite that owns the whole world, which forges
everything in its' own image, which in history has no equal in unrivalled
power. And yet, which so hates itself and its' own creation & everyone that
fawns before it, it wants nothing more than to destroy everything to bring our
Lord & saviour riding to glory on a mushroom cloud - to save their helpless
fat arse from themself...
Fortunately (vis conscious gravity) the geo pol/eon
meltdown which destroys many of it's transmitting structures also debilitates
said elite's control of the initiative for just long enough to
allow collective free will...
The positive assertion of collective
control of time - space, aided by it's negative corrollary conscious gravity
temporarily undermining said elite's control of the initiative for just long
enough to allow collective free will
...to seize the initiative...
.....Creation (via the self destruct mechanism breaks
down completely), unless it can become truly independant
by exercising decisively it's own free will (at the general
level)...
...exploiting the cataclysmic threat to enable it's
execution....
Correspondingly therefore conscious gravity...
(which as already noted makes demons/
intergalactic tyranny impossible as it limits/ sets boundaries on the
power of God's creation - so that,
again, the free will of this creation is/ remains an independant/
viable entity..)....
...sets limits on the power of individuals (again
preventing demons), so that free will (sovereignty) has actually to be
pooled in order to be manifestly exercised, so that mastery of time - space
(the first step on the road to humanity becoming God) is a collective
endeavour...
...so that we can deduce from this, that the effective
exercise of free will, for both God..
(the
germ of which as already noted, is the mastery of time - space; neccessary to
enable God to ultimately create its' mirror image, space - time; become our
cosmic parents & visit the same crap on successor cosmic generations...)...
...as well as humanity, is therefore bound up with an
acceptance of its limitations...
But as regards the obvious Q, of why should
God set up a program/ process whereby the most precious theory (growing
independantly out of it) is in its' initial development, entirely
dependant on the efforts of one as volatile & precariously perched (socio
economically) such as I,
The obvious riposte, is that on all planets where this
somewhat sordid game is being played out & intelligent life survives, the
terrifying experiance of having so very nearly not survived, will have the
required cultural effect, of progressively eclipsing all
parochialisms. So that intelligent life's vision is forever gyrostabilised by
being cast ever further outwards. Firstly to greater threats binding it
together but beyond this, indeed bound up with this & beyond terror
itself...
beyond
parochial planetary concerns, as it is neccessary to connect with other
planetary civilisations to deal with threats too vast to confront at the (mere)
planetary level, the (drive for) acquisition of knowledge as an end in itself,
must transcend even the culture of the common threats to humanity's existence;
as a precondition to enable humanity to deal with such threats...
.....to become God our cosmic parents & visit the
same crap on the next cosmic generation.
If this universalist conception as an incipient supreme
being eclipses all other God dialectics…
(elaborate)
…what then is the supreme evidence for the
existence of (such) a deity/ creator?
Well, if time/ consciousness & free will are
one & the same from the standpoint of both creator & created…
…then that the will to master our own time (necessary as the
focus of our permanent Revolution to prevent oblivion/ enable us to master
ourselves) is self evidently contingent upon the will to master God’s
time, & correspondingly must draw on this supra reserve of
courage…
to
transcend the (aforementioned) constraints of matter, via
exercise of our own free will…
….until
the universalist intelligence/ conception has sufficiently come
of age, that it can so sustain itself & ultimately visit the
same crap on the next cosmic generation (the universalist conception
being our cosmic babywalker - enabling us to avoid falling headlong into our
own pile of nukes)…
…serves as just such
proof of God’s existence…
My (intellectual) empire has simply become (much) too big for me (individually) to even hope to keep up with (requirements of) its' further development.
Though there is nothing that I cannot do, given time/ resources to cover/ develop.
But as with the USA, the combined Godly/ demonic primal lust for full spectrum dominance is curtailed by the logic of overstretch. This logic (at every level, in every Q) is what prevents individuals by themselves, assuming the power of a demonic God over others (see USA imperiums' global self destruct logic).
So while in the transition from war/ finance nexus to a geo pol/econ where civil society has mastery of its' own creation (rather than be the slaves of the war/ finance nexus), common threats/ objectives that confront all humanity ARE what enables the stabilisation of equality (acts as our immediate cultural `war substitute' to bind us together - enable further development)...
...Ultimately, humanity will in order to develop beyond a given point, have to outgrow even the primal exhilaration of (collective) terror & the opportunities for individual egos (bridled by logic of common threats/ objectives) afforded by such...
For to connect (as needs must) with other species from other planets, even to deal with galactic/ cosmic threats, we will need to transcend terror itself in order to transcend individual planetary parochialism...
...Not merely lust to become God, but actually take the first steps beyond terror on the practical road to becoming God, our cosmic parents (& passing the same crap onto the next cosmic generation)...
...Indeed the struggle for intelligent life to master itself/ become God is in effect a struggle to be reconciled with (as well as become) our cosmic parents (ad infinitum for later cosmic generations).
If we were offered the adventure, we'd never accept it. So it had to be laid out by the Deity/ Creator as a fait accompli....
....A
progressive series of arbitrary coups, actively endorsed/ turned to Revolution,
as conscious intelligent life seizes ownership of the process & is thence
finally able to embrace it's creator on its' own terms & as an equal.
F The Humility of God
What then remains of Christianity (& other such)? Of
traditions reaching back over thousands of years in which the struggle for
freedom has not merely gone alongside but been shot through with predatory/
colonial murder - as is only to be expected of a humanity riven through with
paradox - emerging/ struggling to break free from the primordial sludge &
strugling to gain conscious mastery of itself???
Is all (by default) to be ripped up again in the name of
a shiny new religion/ ideology, with (not only some of the apex elite executd
simply to establish that law coves & holds accountable all humanity, but)
everything everyone held precious even amidst their own resentment, cast down
into the flames in answer to the siren call of `purity'???
No. For as seen the new rev theory which can deal with
all said threats arising out of such (which paves the way for space centric
civilisation) itself manifestly draws heavily on/ is informed by all such
(paradoxical) traditions. For without such, it would self evidantly
be quite impossible for humanity to (get a cultural handle to) absorb the
antidote to their apocalyptic component...
Q WHAT
great conceptual principle does this illustrate???
In order for humanity to become God/ our cosmic parents,
to avoid fucking up the next cosmic generation any more than is unavoidably
neccessary, it is neccessary for us to acquire a measure of humility such as
only a respect for our ancestral origins tempered by a sober honesty about their
shortcomings can teach us...
For while it is unreasonable for the next cosmic
generation to expect humanity become God to reduce itself back down to the
grimpen mire of its primitive evolutionary development, it is equally
unreasonable for God (now or humanity become God in the future) to forget the
pain and horror of those that did not ask to be created....
Which finally leaves us with the great Q, vis
the origins of the first supreme being:
7 The Edge of Beyond
`Imagination is more important than knowledge,
for
imagination encompasses the whole universe’
– Albert Einstein
There still remains
the Q:
Who/ what created the
first deity/ supreme being?
From what we have demonstrated so
far we can attempt the beginnings of an answer to this Q in this
neccessarily unfinished/ scarcely begun volume – which may take a billion years
or more to complete.
Given:
1) That (as seen) time/ consciousness & free will
are one & the same from the standpoints of both creator & created.
2) That it is material constraints in this
universe especially death, that prevents demons from emerging, so that
intelligent life must cooperate on a universal scale to progress
to become a new deity or perish.
…Then without such
material constraints the Q can be turned around.
Eg what (pre God/
existence of any creation) was there to stop the first supreme
being willing itself into existence?
Wheras constrained by the substance around
us, humanity is forced (by logic – not by the police) to acknowledge our
creator in order to progress…
…to gain control of our time &
(through this) universal (God’s/ our creator’s) time, in concert
with intelligent life throughout the universe.
The drive for such functioning as an
incipient supreme being/ God dialectic.
To transcend the (aforementioned) constraints of matter, exercise of our own free will…
…until the universalist intelligence/ conception has sufficiently come of age, so that it can so sustain itself & ultimately visit the same crap on the next cosmic generation…
(the
universalist conception being our cosmic babywalker – enabling us to avoid
falling headlong into our own pile of nukes)
…In accordance with the principle of `they fuck you up your cosmic mum &/ or dad, they may not want (???!!!) to but they do…’
So a key related Q arising be, does this
not mean (as we already seem to have demonstrated) that there are
constraints on God’s free will, indirectly???
That it cannot create
another deity, but any potential deity (springing forth from
creation) must choose of its’ own free will to become such?
In that it is only via
the constraints of matter etc (with all that entails for poor bloody creation),
that the first (& ultimately successor Gods), could create without
becoming celestial Saddam Husseins???
Well, while as (already) noted in
`The Battle of Jerusalem (Mk1)’, the Russia Q proves the viability of the
universalist conception, that humanity can hold together states based on
gigantic visions/ ideas (not just the war/ finance nexus)….
…The definitive answer
to the Q
`Where did the first deity come
from?’
Is not immediately
proveable with such practical reference to humanity’s history &/ or
immediate historic requirements (vis apocalyptic crisis),
& I would surmise until
we are both ready for & need the answer to this Q (as a precondition for
further progress), it shall continue to evade us – even as we must
pursue it, to power our imagination, the warp drive of the human soul…