(MK5 Provisional Draft)
Substance
Over Form
Conceptually
Outgunning
(By Adam G. Ghaznavi)
1)
The Battle of Jerusalem
Conceptually Outgunning
USA Rapture Psychology
2) Nuclear
Shotgun Wedding
3)
The (Global Reserve) Bank of Jerusalem
4)
The Jihad For the Global Constitution
5)
The Apocalyptic Triangulation of the USA Empire
6)
Programmed For Self Destruction
7)
Paradoxes of the Human Soul
8)
The Edge of Beyond
War will never end because it is seen as wicked; only when it is seen
as vulgar
- Oscar
Wilde
1 The Battle of Jerusalem
4 Billion years of
earth evolution,
10 million years of
hominoid existence,
10,000 years of the
war/ finance nexus,
& 300 years of
industrial capitalism,
…have finally led us to
this point in history, where the last bankrupt military plutocratic superpower
in history, in a desperate bid to retain control of the military geo pol/econ
agenda…
…to preserve the
petrodollar upon which the $8Trillion USA budget deficit & $700billion
annualized trade deficit is based
…is committing itself
to a war with Iran
to counter establishment of Iranian oil
bourse (undermining the petrodollar), the Iranian challenge to USA nuclear
hegemony (& corresponding regional strategic interests – vis Iran’s
imperial competition in the region)…
…which because it will be
such a disaster, it must re-inforce, to prevent USA psycho political economic
center collapsing immediately (that very day/ hour)…
…feeding into wider
regional/ global pol/econ chaos, including vis Israel/ Palestine, which (if it
does not start with USA weakness causing Israel to take unilateral initiative,
to avoid looking weak leading directly to instead of ultimately) causes Israel
(all peoples descending into laager psychology) to demolish the Dome of the
Rock – leading to general (as opposed to partial) convergence on Mecca &
the Sunni/ Shia fighting against each other in Mecca for the mantle of control…
…anarchy/ the oil
turned off (eg the flaming of the oilfields to get the eastern bankers to dump
the dollar & go for gold to end the agony sooner rather than later)…
…Triggering all out
race war in USA – USA/ Mexico border war (which is at time of writing 28/1/06 –
played down to avoid catalyzing the dollar tailspin – vis fear escalation/ all
out border war/ race war)…
Yet paradoxically it is
in the very components that make up the global peasant war
threatening to over-run a degenerate metropolitan core plundering the world at
the point of a (USA) nuclear six shooter (itself a form of undeclared permanent
warfare; feeding inexorably into the open hot war)…
Paradoxically, the geo pol/econ
outline of our salvation is to be found precisely in apocalyptic threats
unleashed by the war/ finance nexus vis its’
Organic consumptive patterns of control
The
dialectics of resource depletion play an increasingly important geo military
pol/econ role.
This
is not a coincidence, but built into the very process of geo pol/econ linear
development/ evolution of the war/ finance nexus…
- At the macro & micro level,
consumption functions as a destructive productive means of control (by USA led
war/ finance nexus). Eg as an organic process by cconsuming resources/ land
etc, you exerted power/ control at the micro & macro level, preventing
adversaries individual & macro political, making use of them (Godfather III
- `Your enemies grow strong on what you leave behind’)…
And
post WWII, this formerly incipient dialectic came into its own as a decisive
factor in its own right.
Firstly
as a (molecular & macro) block against revolution
This
is also why USA helped buffer states to develop as a geo pol/econ bulwark
against spread of USSR bloc post WWII.
Secondly
(after threat of revolt subsided) through sheer inertial (& hubristic post
cold war continuing) momentum.
& the psycho political impact of defeat of
progressive nationalist resistence in the cold war.
(Role of Vietnam war in terrorising
resistence `destroying countries to save them’ to raise prohibitively the costs
of doing so)
…Combined with the cultural/ techno/
corporate expansionism necessary to re-inforce/ consolidate such
including (as a largely organic more
than conspiratorial process) to sell the western consumerist vision
This direct imposition of the
hegemony/ interests of the first world metropole over the 3rd world (analogous
to the way the Roman empire dominated the frontiers – stimulating the
development of the very armed formations that over-ran them) has a most curious
effect; in that the very structures of imperial control become the very
agencies of imperial ruination…
…by those seeking a piece of the pie
&/ or to `hit back’ often simultaneously, through insecurity/ instability
of supply of key resources, hopelessly unsustainable rates of immigration to
the metropole along its own rapid transit systems – as well as through
asymmetric warfare…
…which taken together amount in
effect to a global peasant war – threatening to over-run the USA
led metropolitan core…
For as well as vis technology, the
message/ means used organically to control the global peasantry vis
modern media/market forces, means the global peasantry now has a global
reach/ impact, which has to be taken notice of…
…wheras before, at
both the progressive & reactionary levels, there were entire social
bulwarks/ classes acting as buffers between the imperial metropolitan core
& the great mass of global humanity…
…by (organically) appealing directly
to the global people (over the heads of their rulers progressive &
reactionary) the USA led imperial metropolitan core has become much more of a direct
target, has destroyed the old geo pol/econ buffers between (USA
led) metropolitan core & the 3rd world…
Eg if the FMLN/ FSLN failed to
resist USA tyranny in El Salvador/ Nicaragua, who cares? Just hop over the
Mexican border into the USA…
Eg
immigration to USA is, as long as the petrodollar holds up, a safety valve for
Mexico, therefore the USA elite attempts to work (on basis of their hegemony) with
the grain of such – vis their plans for copying Chinese prison gulag labor
system – which Alex Jones alludes to (which plans however be cut across by the
crash of the petrodollar).
Pissed off with the way your country
is as a result of your previous Islamic fascists anti communist alliance with
the USA? Sick of their smug burger munching faces on your TV everyday? Its not
your fault, so just blow the mothers away a la Sept 11th…
…Or if you are feeling generous,
just blow up an oil pipeline & let them walk their fat arses off…
& this mortal peril, rather than chastening
USA imperial hubris, renders it more explosive in its laager
psychology.
Though the point would have to be conceded,
that any failure to check USA imperial hubris leads to an apocalyptic
nuclear expansionist decadence/ tailspin in any case.
Indeed as noted earlier, Sept 11th
actually stabilised USA geo pol/econ psychology, for a period, by preventing
(shifting focus from) scandals vis Enronisation of the entire geo pol/econ
gaining their own critical momentum…
& as the essence of the global
peasant war is the power to challenge/ even break the (USA led) metropolitcan
core without itself being able to consolidate a new/ alternative
geo pol/econ centre of gravity; the proliferation of WMD…
USA
threatens China, China goes nuclear, India responds likewise, Pakistan follows
& trades spare parts to fund its own program…
…must also be
considered part of the global peasant war
(moreover,
we have already seen how/ why China/ India cannot, as megastates, take over
from USA as imperial leaders of the military plutocratic system – so that
insofaras they are part of the metropolitan core, they are on basis of
war/ finance nexus, even more so part of the 3rd world)
Eg both because USA’s
attempts (aided by threat of its own 10,000 nukes) to deliberately retard
countries development (so as to prevent them even having the capacity to
develop their own WMD programs) feeds inexorably into (global) revanchist
sentiment AND because this consequent imbalance is an additional
factor meaning the geo pol/econ cost of WMD development is so great that such
become the innate focus of the state political psychology (of
course, for such not to be hindered, would mean the `effortless’
acquisition of WMD would both encourage others to commit themselves & lead
to general quantative & qualitative proliferation of WMD)…
…& were we not already heading
for such, this USA drive for `full spectrum dominance’ would be the primary
cause for global econ collapse…
Which brings us to the next factor,
the failure of the info revolution to either automatically enable
a post military plutocratic order, or prevent the collapse of the
military plutocratic system…
For inevitably the (character of
the) info revolution was shaped by the inevitable rise of global
finance beyond the control of any nation state…
…as a tool to assist this process…
& yet the
information revolution has made the old repressive military plutocratic state
(its machinery), ever increasingly unviable (as a means to retain control –
even briefly) – even as it grasps impotently for more power it withers away – without
automatically giving rise to a new post military plutocratic order…
Eg for while the info revolution was
self evidently integral to the breaking of the power of
(generally parochial) organised labor – it nevertheless armed to the teeth the
very sam people, as a potential global civil society…
Not so much as workers, still less
as consumers, but rather as thinking humans – held together by the culture of
the common threats/ objectives confronting all humanity – the chief objective being
to gain control of our own time, to not only master all threats to our survival
but universal time itself…
But paradoxically, to awaken/ enable
global civil society to so mobilise itself, the revanchist 3rd world
fascists had to be the initial beneficiaries to
help re-animate people in the process of the collapse/ breaking of the old
centre BEFORE the Revolution could fill the breech & establish the new
centre of gravity (eg vis the Nuclear Shotgun Wedding between the
Revolution & the old order we shall cover in Chapter 3)…
The key here is a general
unwillingness to die in strategic battles of for the interests of our elites
& how this reshapes the psycho political battlefield – that
the raising of the perceived price of blood, vis the 3rd world, is precisely
what makes us weak before asymmetric warfare…
…& (paradoxically) gives
them the techno advantage
eg as our lopsided/ top heavy techno
configuration is turned against us (never mind also by spread of disease from
impoverished 3rd world overwhelming the metropole) & not just
(though as well as by) Al Qaeda’s diffuse cyber model…
even though their `victory’ leads to
the destruction of the very technologies that enable them to wage their
campaign - leading to descent into primal panic/ chaos etc – though this is
even more spectacularly the case with the attempt to prop up the petrodollar
regime itself…
…that the clue to our collective
salvation can be found
Yet, to
think it is JUST a Q of counterposing revolutionary global security
frameworks/ geo pol/econ reconstructionist programs (Common Ownership of
Information for oil for solar microgeneration) especially wartime
econ sacrifices for solar powered desalination…
Enabled via a managed depression…
Partially
analogous to the way that defeat for Britain in USA war of independence closed
of any illusory prospect of passing on costs of falling rate of mercantile
profit onto colonists; forcing pol/econ reconfiguration/ a longwave switch of
cheap capital (from mercantile trading) towards industrial development,
preparing way for longwave boom
The
chief difference being, the previous case was an entirely organic process…
(aided by captive
markets in India, forced to buy industrially manufactured cotton cloth while
the competition was suppressed – a crude symbiosis of war & finance)
…wheras commitment to solar powered
desalination requires exercise of conscious global political will – impelled by
threats of oblivion if we do not.
…neccessary
vis:
1) Sustainable energy & global energy
security
Eg given ease of
targeting pipelines, development of new supplies only possible on basis of
raising living standards in new oil producing locale itself - which over the
long run increases aggregate demand outstripping supplies brought on stream by
said locale – exacerbating/ accelerating shortage problems
Furthermore the consequent (national security state/
oil energy baron centred secureaucratic) geo pol/econ agendas (& corresponding global finance credit
expansionary imperium) have a terminal tendancy to promote
commodity fetishistic/ insanely short termist consumptive patterns..
2) Halt the charge into the
environmental abyss - vis combined dynamics of global warming/ ice age
Eg accelerated greenhouse
effect, leading to drying out/ ignition/ burning of Amazon/ Congo carbon sinks,
washing into/ saturating the oceans - a double impact on/ catalysing the
release of massive amounts of methane - melting polar caps/ flooding warm water
gulf stream with cold fresh water turning of gulf stream leading to mini (or
worse) ice age.
3) The Permanent Revolution -
Reconfigure (from top to bottom & centre) the entire global social (&
political) economic balance of power - permanently
Away from
apocalyptic national security state/
oil energy baron centred secureaucratic agendas & (corresponding) global
finance imperium; & towards global civil society (`an Englishman's/ African
women's home is his/ her power station').
Eg establishing a substantive
soveriegnty of the individual - which can be pooled to block any
resurgence of plutocratic pol/econ power (with all the apocalyptic consequances
such entails).
Eg as an
exponential increase in number of nuclear power stations, would be
catastrophically prone to budgetry cutbacks effecting safety, such a policy…
(even if not
as almost certainly be, inherently abortive - at the geo psycho
pol/econ level, eg an instinctive gut awareness of its unviability preventing
such holding the centre over the short/ medium term anyway)
…would lead to an apocalyptic geo pol/econ chain
reaction of dozens/ hundreds of Chernobyls.
Furthermore, by the
time new propsed nuke power stations come on stream, Electro Magnetic Pulse
Weapons be readily available – which would require the full paraphanalia of a
fascist state in order to defend such – making them MORE of a target for
various apocalyptic nihilists; & reducing the wider population to a state
of hostile indifference between said forces…
As
no one will trust unbacked paper currency after the dollar fiasco, & the
gold standard is inherently deflationary (encourages hoarding
etc), the only way to establish a new currency will be to back it with the most
substantive/ vital unit of value of all, energy.
In
the immediate term this means oil/ gas – literally the pumping of
such liquidity into the market as global welfare as a desperate measure to
stave of total geo pol/econ collapse for long enough to enable
conversion solar power etc.
The
advantage of the energy standard is that it encourages
expansionary development of solar power as recipients of global welfare will
not wish to so try the patience of their benefactors for any longer than we
absolutely have to
(it
is also self evident, that refusing to grant such, must lead to
the collapse of civilisation & such utter corresponding ruination of those
holding the oil/ gas reserves – to the point that the expertise/ infrastructure
even to make use of such will be irrevocably lost forever – that to do so will
cost them far more than granting such global welfare)
Moreover,
the security in depth solar power microgeneration affords the
citizenry of every land, will forever be proof against any bunch of thuggish
military plutocrats ever again being able to monopolise the entire geo pol/econ
agenda for their own petit minded self aggrandizing ends…
Our
longterm geo pol/econ survival therefore is entirely contingent upon turning an
initially oil/ gas based energy currency into an expansionary solar power
energy currency…
This
of course cannot take place in a vacuum – hence this work is primarily
concerned with the establishment of the new global security architecture &
global constitutional framework; which must serve as the preconditions for
accomplishing said objectives…
5) Positive impact technology
Eg a long term
weapon in the battle against desertification/ enabling farming in the Sahara,
so new carbon sinks elsewhere; to buy (more) time capital for humanity, in the war to develop the further measures required to
bring the environment into sustainable/ managed equilibrium (eg this will not
be the end nor even the beginning of the end, but it will be, the end of the
beginning).
…as an
antidote to & propelled by
everyone’s fear of apocalyptic chaos (from all quarters)…
…is to
miss the point about what kind of APOCALYPTIC narrative propels USA geo
psychology &
therefore what kind of global vision
(contextualising said geo strategic frameworks/ geo pol/econ reconstructionist
programs – propelled by everyone’s fear of apocalyptic chaos from all quarters) &
corresponding methodology (calibrated to address/ project such) is required to
eclipse it…
USA Rapture Psychology
& The Mother of
All Disappointments
To note, the underlying logic behind
current USA military plutocratic involvement in the mideast is
highly complex/ meshed. Most straightforward be the dynamic set in train by
Sept 11th 2001 – which secured operational
control of the geo pol/con agenda for the neo
cons, providing a narrative legitimacy for a series of wars to secure
military resource hegemony – especially to prop up the petrodollar.
Wether Sept 11th 2001 was blowback (Bin
Laden expressing his ingratitude to his old CIA benefactors in an act of psycho
political transference…) or a strategy of tension plot, we can at least be
absolutely sure that this agenda/ dynamic (including September the 11th
2001 & its aftermath) is the product of the Diabolical
Trinity: USA petrodollar agenda, in alliance with Saudi feudalism &
its fundamentalist cohorts (on both sides of the equation,
Christian vis USA, Islamic vis Saudi etc) as props of said
petrodollar agenda.
As invading Afghanistan seemed a
pisspoor measure to restore damaged USA prestige...
Eg
the real subtextual substance (for which all the diplomatic
maneuverings were so much camouflage) was the unwritten law (self evident to
every child) that as an American’s life is worth so much more than
equivalent in the 3rd world; it was necessary to raise the
ante to `restore order’ in terms of geo psychology (to show who’s
boss) Eg `Some brown people had attacked America, therefore vastly more brown
people had to become directly (as opposed to indirectly) subject to the
vagaries of American power’.
This meant of course, attacking
Iraq...
(or
nuking somebody - we have Tony Blair to thank for going along with the capital
criminal Iraq war, to act as a moral hostage able to slow down, for a period,
this psycho political impulse – eg even the likes of Senator John McCain was
quick to call for use of nukes vis Sept 11th, & he is by no means the
nuttiest).
Which meshed with aforementioned prior
objectives (pre Sept 11th) of securing oil resources & insuring USA
strategic supremacy `full spectrum dominance' (as per official stated USA
policy); propping up USA finance speculative/ credit expansionary based system (including
by defending the petrodollar), for a while longer.
But these are only the sane
policies, which seamlessly tip over into, pursuing the objective
of (totally insane) USA `Rapture' psychology
Specifically the idea of a kind of
an `American Israel' where `USA is chosen by God to lead the
world to the Kingdom of Christ…’...
(eg
as especially such unrestrained power needs to justify itself to
itself, `divine sanction' neccessary as legitimising ideology/ narrative
- which (as at 12 Jan 2005) over 50% of USA population adheres to; BEFORE
any major apocalyptic geo pol/econ tailspin (eg vis dollar collapse) pushes
them into primal panic/ desperation...
...To remove obstacles percieved to
be hindering the fulfillment of prophecies/ preconditions for the `Rapture'
& Christ’s' second coming...
...Specifically to
enable Israel (strengthen its position, enabling it) to demolish the Dome of
the Rock, rebuild the temple, which shall herald the return ofour Lord &
Saviour to `Rapture Up’ (to heaven) our apple pie muching bretheren & smite
the rest of us
after which, as per Revelations 7:4, the
Jews shall be punished for their failure to acknowledge King Jesus & be
reduced from 30 million to 144,000 (the inevitable/ inexorable failure of such
a policy to stabilise control of the oil - obviously being the perfidious Jews’
fault; vis their failure to acknowledge King Jesus); whereupon our Lord &
Saviour, shall `Rapture' up (to heaven) our apple pie munching bretheren &
smite the rest of us....
The key point, is how vis especially
the baseline scenario, weakened USA position in Iraq, leads to the Israeli unilateral
initiative – leading to ethnic cleansing/ destruction of the Dome of the Rock,
leading to the oil being turned off…
…which in turn also utterly destroys
the restraining position of the anti neo con forces in the USA…
…which seismic geo psycho pol/econ
reality leads to USA nuke war against Iran to attempt to restore supply and the
petrodollar AND OPEN manifestations of USA Rapture freakery
descends inexorably into leading China dumping the $ to prevent USA running
amok with the nukes…
Eg USA strength AND
USA weakness (or ANY hybrid of the 2) lead to the same result vis
the Iran war and its inexorable failure.
No conventional state
policy can arrest this inexorable geo psychology.
Eg a China bluff to threaten to sell
(vast reserves of) dollars (to prevent attack on Iran or even to defend Russian
territorial integrity from increasingly desperate/ insane USA aided attempts to
foment a rising in the interests of elite/ compradorist elements more amenable
to USA interests)…
& Europe has been helping out
USA over Iran. For the same reason Britain helped USA over Iraq, to attempt to
appease USA laager psychology/ attempt to contain use of nukes (or in this case
convince themselves that their cooperation helps to mitigate such – when the
point id, that it simply feeds the hubristic apocalyptic narrative)…
…eg this paradoxically represents
the partial sublimation of the ever broadening/ deepening (of) USA rapture
psychology, within a legitimized framework…
Q. WHAT about the role of France in
backing USA over Syria Q (for historic reasons of colonial pique)?
This is hardly a reason for all
Europe to grease the path to the Iran war. This is simply sheer continental
drift. That as Europe/ world not yet ready/ prepared to take on tasks of global
constitutional leadership, by default, Europe ends up supporting
USA policy UNTIL it is apocalyptically exhausted. EU policy can
be summed up as `frigging in the rigging – cause there’s fuck all else to do…’
This therefore gives
the Iran war the superficial appearance of being principally
about trying to save the petrodollar…
…except of course, following the
Iraq debacle it self evidently cannot…
…& USA bombworshippers shall
reveal the underlying logic by coming out under their own banner – vis
destruction of the Dome of the Rock… to rebuild the tribulation temple –
whereupon our Lord & Saviour shall
`Rapture Up’ to heaven our apple pie munching bretheren & smite the rest of
us
…Therefore vis Iran war (wether
following the aforementioned baseline scenarios or a Gulf of Tonkin II or a
strategy of tension model), a vain attempt to save the petrodollar, tips over
inexorably into its principle logic of USA rapture psychology.
BUT aided by the China
crashing of the petrodollar to prevent USA running amok with the nukes
(3/11/06) the failure of the Messiah to show up leads to the Mother
of All Disappointments & a hardening ofUSA rapture Psychology, its
re-focussing on Revelations 7:4, stipulating that the Jews shall/ must be
punished for their failure to acknowledge King
Jesus & be reduced from 30 million to 144,000 (the inevitable/
inexorable failure of such a policy to stabilize control of the oil - obviously being the perfidious Jews’ fault,
vis their failure to acknowledge King Jesus). Whereupon our Lord & Saviour
shall `Rapture Up’ (to heaven) our apple pie munching bretheren & smite the
rest of us…
This interregnum, the Mother of All
Disappointments & the turnaround time between the first `mild’ wave of
rapture freakery & the consolidation of the second harder version, provides
a just about sufficient window of opportunity to engineer global security architecture & corresponding
geo pol/econ constitutional framework – by trading apocalyptic threats of
against each other – held together by culture of common threats/ objectives
confront all humanity…
Worthy
of dishonourable mention be a host of other deathcults. Everything from those
that believe that humanity should be culled for sustainability, to those that believe
that all human life itself should be extinguished. Indeed in the white heat of
such geo psycho dynamics, if it has not developed directly already, we can
expect to emerge a kind of pharaoh like ideology that advocates that all life
be extinguished so that such can take such chattels with them to the afterlife.
No more absurd than Rapture Psychology. & indeed such represents a kind of
consistent absurdity under its own momentum…
But until then, USA regime has the
operational initiative granted them by virtue of their sheer insanity - until
the Iran war begins (leading to the collapse of the center) – unleashing Americas’ fear of America (as
the bombworshippers come out under their own banner – even as they be part of
something that terrifies them more than any other deathcult in all history) the
key to humanity seizing control of the geo pol/econ agenda & with it, its’
own conscious destiny……
…eg
dealing with apocalyptic threat of USA rapture psychology gives Revolution
command of the geo strategic agenda, enabling it to deal with all other
apocalyptic threats from all other quarters. In the 4th section of
this pamphlet we will examine how the Revolution consolidates this process at
the geo cultural level in `The Universalist Conception’.
The Battle
of Jerusalem
Post
aforementioned geo pol/econ collapse, the Battle of Jerusalem is the
decisive geo strategic point whereby the entire global agenda (global
security framework; which sets the agenda for the global constitutional framework;
which in turn sets the terms for the global pol/econ agenda) is decisively shifted from the sphere of military
(specifically military plutocratic & warlordist) control, to the arena of
(geo) political psychology - the battlefield of peoples’ minds.
Eg it is absolutely impossible to
impose a settlement by force. The only viable use of force is that deployed in
such a way so as to prevent hostile parties from slaughtering each other for
just long enough so as to preserve a sufficient space in peoples’ minds, to
allow the new rev geo security/ constitutional & pol/econ settlement to
kick in.
In this vein, ` neutralizing doomsday’
strategies are outlined in event of use of nukes by one element or another in
`Communique Number 1’ & `Intro to Quantum Materialism’ in Lucifer2TM.zip’.
This
process while centred on Israel/ Palestine Q, is designed (woven in with said Israel/ Palestine Q) to
force global security trade offs – especially vis control of nuke weapons – which process in turn sets
the agenda for/ defines the parameters of the global constitutional & pol/econ settlement
(especially for solar powered desalination – to quench the thirst for revenge/
support for revanchist ideologies)…
As we shall see, Britain, Pakistan, USA
must give up their nukes sequentially, to enable the setting up/ continuation
& completion of a global security architecture – which in turn sets the
global pol/econ constitutional agenda…
…wheras other nuke powers within the
regional superstates/ commonwealths – set up within the framework of the
constitutional agenda (enable/ defined by new global security architecture) are
compelled (as we shall see) to give up their nukes to avoid destabilizing said
commonwealths; which would so rapidly & completely lead to their ruination
as to render such self evidently more trouble than they be worth…
At
each step of the way the spectre of global oblivion (among all hostile parties)
is exploited to force progress/ keep the progress on track, & the decisive
point/ showdown is where all of humanity are challenged to come out onto the
streets to actively endorse/ railroad through said global security framework on pain of
corresponding oblivion if they do not.
The global focus for this process is the `Battle of Jerusalem’ (we shall examine
shortly) when the political commander of (British) forces in Israel/ Palestine
is, must be arraigned for blocking the transfer of the last piece of Palestinian territories back to the Palestinians; until Pakistan (after Britain destroys its nukes – a process monitored especially
by the Russians) gives a formal commitment to destroying (all, but beginning
with) 50% of its nukes, to be carried out after Israel hands over last of 1967 territories…
In exchange for which Pakistan gets control of the global presidency in
Jerusalem (Pakistan destroys remaining nukes), positioning it to focus
attention on the breaking of Hindu fascism in India; by among other things
rebuilding the Barbary Mosque in Ayodhya and a globalist vision that eclipses
Hindu fascism in India (enabling re-unification).
Eg for South Asian troops to lead permanent
global onsite control & monitoring of ALL USA nuke installations (all such transferred to global
control for agreed global purposes eg asteroid strikes/ the thermonuclear
linear shear lancing of the Yellowstone Caldera & after the water has been
drained from its volcanic dams, the systematic reduction of the Cumbre Veja
volcano – eg as it is more & more the case that the knowledge to create
brings with it the knowledge/ power to destroy, you cannot abolish such
knowledge/ technologies, but you can & must subject them to global
monitoring & control for agreed purposes) restraining USA apocalyptic
expanionism to free up USA visionary expansionism – especially for solar power
desalination saving the Ganges….
If at
any stage USA attempts to block this process, eg from the removal of the Hebron
settlers to the last USA nuke installations coming under global control, the
oil is
turned of by (incipient) Medina Commonwealth…
The capital of which be Palestine/
East Jerusalem –
…(this framework be mutually
preferable to confrontations with Israeli missile command)
…But
critically, the global security context that in turn enables Medina to conquer
its own internal demons…
(a process examined in next section
`Historical Liquidation of the Apocalypse Legends’)
…is a
framework of (aforementioned) South Asian consolidation of the Revolution
(security) settlement with role of Europe, which in context of unfolding apocalyptic
chaos, can only avoid its’ brushfires turning into firestorms/ anarchy by being
redefined as the transitional bulwark of emergent Global Commonwealth
Confederation…
(we examine how this is done in
`Communique Number 1’)
…blocking
USA apocalyptic expansionism in order to free up USA visionary expansionism
(not just for solar powered desalination – but also for the
`Universalist Conception’ which we shall examine in the 4th section
of this pamphlet.).
If
Pakistan renages, the threat of non eclipsed Hindu fascism threatens it.
The
critical point is, as there is no mandated global constitutional order for Pakistan to assume the
presidency of, Pakistan cannot, as a linear process
immediately, give formal agreement to destroy its
nukes when Israel hands over the last part of the occupied 1967 territories.
THIS leads to a deadly impasse. Palestinians rushing the last
part of their land (which if ceded without aforementioned wider geo strategic gaurentees for Israel, would tip over into a
threat to Israel proper); necessitating the use of deadly force by British
troops, to prevent Israeli missile command kicking in…
The
political commander of British troops (wether me or someone else) must be put
on trial. The Iranians being the best to lead this (natural leaders vis mideast
oil; able to turn it of if we refuse) – vis western machinations in mideast…
…I
will then (quite properly) be sentenced to death, suspended for 100 days, to
allow my hunger strike `Battle of Jerusalem’ to call for popular endorsement of said global security
framework…
…politically centred on Jerusalem as the capital of the
Global Commonwealth Confederation (defined by culture of common threats/
objectives confronting all humanity – most immediately solar powered
desalination as the centre of global security).
The Medina Commonwealth (capital:
East Jerusalem) united as a single superstate providing stable supplies of
expensive oil – enabling/ catalyzing development of/ shift to solar powered
desalination.
…by the whole world (as Iranians etc cannot possibly be expected to
take the word of a single western politician for gold coin) on pain of
oblivion/ anarchy if they do not…
The
mothers being the vanguard/ moral force best placed to lead this process,
enabling the eclipse of the paradox of arms, that we need the right to bear arms to keep in check a
potential resurgent nuclear/ military plutocratic tyranny but to be effective
this right must not actually be used; therefore the mothers as the decisive
vanguard/ moral force in the world, enable the resolution of this paradox. Eg
the calculus of all force from the state, paramilitary/ even vigilante, to
avoid chaos, must from the beginning all be gyro stabilized by this Jerusalem
centred focus – on the basis that force is only of value in that it
keeps hostile factions apart for just long enough to allow the Revolution
settlement to kick in…
We
shall examine the prior gaurentees given to the Palestinians etc that
demonstrate UK has committed itself decisively to this gameplan/ project, with
no illusions of trying to reassert the old order in Chapter 2 `Nuclear Shotgun
Wedding’)
The Post Battle of Jerusalem Interregnum
In
the event of this plan working, I remain in power until last of 1967 lands handed
back, Pakistan destroys half its’ nukes; handing over power to Pakistan’s
chosen figurehead who will complete Pakistan’s nuke
disarmament after my execution.
…further
motivated by consolidatory geo psycho political shockwave effect of such (&
the power of oil) to chasten any (in any case largely self ruined) USA military
plutocrats.
I or whomsoever else be in political command of the British
Army must be beheaded by a Saudi executioner (the more blood on
his hands the better) in East Jerusalem (the capital of Medina Commonwealth),
the sword immediately destroyed afterwards for optimal cultural impact. No
other ceremony, gimmicks etc, before, during or after. Nothing that detracts
from the stark simplicity of the act - which itself is praxis the final
completion of theory & practice, the consolidation of the global
constitutional & legal framework.
But it does not end there. Because
as Mecca functions as a cultural vortex, destabilising any state not big enough
geographically, geo politically & culturally to eclipse it…
(hence the pact between Saudi Royals
& Islamic fascists – to avoid being culturally outflanked by apocalyptic
nihilists) – vis the aforementioned Sunni/ Shia convergence/ ruinous battle to
control Mecca
…it will only be the manifest fact
that such are self evidently their own worst enemies which shall force the
citizenry of Medina Commonwealth to embrace the currently unthinkable on pain
of the self destruction of their
state (& with it the whole world) if they do not.
Eg just as Muslims administer the
Holy Sepulchre in Jerusalem – preventing general war among the
Christian states/ factions, so, after Israel has got rid of its nukes
(at a time of Israels’
choosing – Israel having no oil weapon to contain any threat to its existence
& no longer being able to rely for their security, on the demented USA
bombworshippers who would destroy them anyway)
…so that Israel no longer is in any
residual way/ or even can be seen as a threat (in the interim, control of oil
is sufficient to gaurentee Medina’s security), Jewish
authorities should be invited to administer Mecca
Again the unification of Medina, is
entirely contingent upon the denuclearisation of any nuke weapons state within
the Medina superstate (eg Iran’s program), that possesses them – failure to do
so means the Medina superstate cannot eclipse Mecca as a cultural vortex &
spells ruin/ oblivion for nuke weapons state as surely as for the non nuclear….
& I, or whomsoever fills said
role, shall use their last speech immediately before their execution to call
for such – so that blood fixes the solution in the citizenry’s minds even
before the last storm is clearly manifest in its truest form, to be so curtailed.
Extinguishing the last diabolic hopes of the USA bombworshippers.
In fact Israel’s role as
gaurentor be the historical precondition for the consolidation of the permanent
union of the mideast (Medina Commonwealth – preventing fratricidal abyss), specifically
the globally re-inforced emphasis on solar powered desalination – which be
dependant on the new global security architecture, as same be dependant (as a
psycho political/ historical/ developmental objective & accomplished fact)
on solar powered desalination. Both finding their point of consolidation in
establishment of the global reserve bank of Jerusalem & a single energy
based (instead of gold or fiat) global currency – literally pumping liquidity
into the market (oil/ gas) before the means to pay for them have been
established in exchange for the establishment of the common ownership of info
- the oil remaining on long enough to
effect the transition to solar powered microgeneration…
For
the split second the sword kisses my neck to the moment it severs my head, I
reign as last king (of the whole world)…
immediately before this (kiss of steel) I am a Republican:
& afterwards for the 20 seconds or so before I die, I become again a good
Republican…
…& so take to the grave (crematorium) sufficient of the power of
the apocalypse legends with me…
…(eclipsed
by culture of the common threats/ objectives confronting all humanity) to
enable effective cultural as well as formal/ legal consolidation of the
developing geo constitutional/ legal framework/ process.
But
beyond this, my execution serves as the focal/
historical point of transcendence.
When
a humanity forced to assert/
proclaim of its’ own free will the necessity of a single global constitutional
framework (by a combo of `Battle of Jerusalem’ with decisively resurgent
apocalyptic threats if they do not)
…covering
& holding accountable all humanity are (by this final removal of all obstacles/ residual alternatives)…
…irrevocably
forced (in spite of
every innate/ primal fear of doing so) to accept decisive stewardship of its
own conscious destiny (the hegemony of a conscious humanity over its own creation/ destiny)…
The
climactic point of 4 Billion years of Earth evolution, when intelligent life finally (in spite of all inbuilt/
innate primordial impulses to the contrary) asserts its ascendancy over the
primordial slurry from which it emerged & threatens to descend back into…
&
how could it be otherwise?
For
a humanity/ consciousness NOT created in the image of a supreme being (by some micro managing
celestial Saddam Hussein) but emerging out of matter/ creation, as
an independent entity...
But
much more (to break its’ auto self destruct
programming) humanity needs a vision cast far beyond itself (in order to stabilize even the overarching culture of the
common threats/ objectives confronting all humanity)…
…drawing
strength/ courage from its’ creator – so that it can master itself as a conscious free entity; to know its’
creator on its’ own terms, as conscious master of its’ own
destiny.
I
cannot emphasise too strongly that the Battle of Jerusalem has to be seen from
the outset of the entire rev process, as the center of its consolidation – if
it is to avoid losing its way/ collapse into anarchy. Therefore every single
decision has to be taken with respect to this lodestar, which must redefine the
entire global agenda.
As whomsoever seeks to establish new
global security architecture at Jerusalem (as needs must), will inevitably be
branded `antichrist’ (by USA bombworshippers) & the most dangerous idea,
arising out of 4 billion years of earth evolution (10,000 years of the war/
finance nexus), is that humanity cannot master itself…
…must rely instead upon a divine
saviour (riding to glory on a mushroom cloud)… as evinced in the Legends of
`the fall’…
There is therefore, no choice
whatever but to turn this to advantage & launch an all out frontal assault
against this entire mode of thinking (hence also the `Lucifer2’ marque as the
only possible marque for this project)
…By actually exploiting the
apocalyptic pre-eminence of such ideas to propel both the antidote (&
historic fragmentation of power – eg execution of the political commander
leading this process – to consolidate the Revolution/ new global security
architecture – holding the attention of before shooting the fox of the
bombworshippers) AND the transcending overarching vision that holds everything
together:
…But, what consolidates
this process, what makes the all important drive to solar powered desalination
reshaping Europe/ world (including Russia) possible is the corresponding
division/ definition of the role between written secular constitution
to insure humanity gains mastery over its own time to comprehend/ master the unwritten
cosmological constitution…
Eg we see the indispensable role of
the Jews/ Israel in enabling Mecca to be stabilized, to stabilize Medina
superstate…
Hitherto the Jews refusal to convert
to any ideology with universalist pretensions fundamentally called into Q those
very pretensions & led to corresponding anti semitic backlash.
This also applied vis
the idea of a socialistic equality as an end in itself (rather than as a means
to an end, to enable accumalation of knowledge to master both common threats/
objectives confronting all humanity AND universal time itself);
as firstly the Jews’ `failure’ to convert earlier to Christianity (socialism’s
ideological precursor), called into Q the sincerity of their socialist
`conversion’ AND because as an end in itself (lacking even the
connecting bonds of war/ finance nexus) parochial socialist equality inexorably
descends into nihilistic nitpicking terror & a thrust to control the
correspondingly untrusted individual psyche WITHOUT the much
wider/ universalist/ expansionist vision to geo culturally stabilize equality –
cultural imperatives themselves only possible in this age of climactic
apocalyptic fear, sufficient to stimulate humanity’s gaining mastery over itself.
Well, the division between written
secular constitution to enable humanity to gain mastery over its’ own
time to comprehend the unwritten cosmological constitution…
…is enshrined not just as a Jewish
but as a global constitutional survival imperative…
…for now (with stability on basis of
war/ finance nexus no longer viable), it is only through instead focusing on a
gigantic vision/ universalist conception, that humanity can be culturally
gyrostabilised & socio pol/econ order be consolidated…
…As all
universalist parochialisms inherently subordinate to the hegemony
of matter over consciousness; egalitarianism (as an end in itself) could ONLY
be (partially) held together (as an ideological construct) by nat sec state impulses/
external threats (eg vis the Russian Revolution etc)…
Hence
no freedom of individual imagination/ conscience was possible …
Within
parochial egalitarian ideological construct – equality as an end in itself – rather
than as an (aforementioned) means to an end
because
no framework for the bridling of such to serve a transcendent
common purpose was possible…
Vis
aforementioned division between secular written constitution
& unwritten universal constitution – the former to gain for all humanity
the time to comprehend the latter
Therefore…
As
the parochial egalitarian ideological state is God, the state
owns the individual, & there is no pooled sovereignty of the individual
…by
default, hegemonic power over the agenda remained in control of
the (correspondingly) more organically flexible
war/ finance nexus…
…Until potential for
automatic material development exhausted – specifically by rise
& crash of USA led (petrodollar based & speculative finance propelled)
credit expansionism – fuelling the terminal clash of apocalyptic
parochialisms
Moving humanity from static MAD, to dynamic
MAD…
…where now (as seen, to survive) we not
only have to balance of the apocalyptic threats against each other, to
forge new global security architecture (& corresponding constitutional
pol/econ framework)…
…but that (to survive) we can &
must, bridle to a common purpose, the wild horses of the human imagination…
…With the universalist vision
of intelligent life's mastering of its' own time as the key to mastering
the universe…
(time, consciousness & free
will, being one & the same thing from the opposite
standpoints of both the creator & created – see Chapter 3 Vol V of `Substance Over Form’,
`paradoxes of the Human Soul’ in Lucifer2TM.zip’)
...as (given the sparsity of
intelligent life in the universe) the technologies enabling
humanity to make contact with other worlds - can only be
developed once humanity has mastered itself...
...which means prioritising
control of its' own time to think, above all else - reducing matter/
finance from the status of master of all humanity, to servant of this conscious
objective....
eg conscious gravity
determines a maximum level of automatic material
development…
(over 4 Billion years of
evolution, 10 million years of hominoid existence to the now 10,000 year old
war/ finance nexus) before the self destruction mechanism (vis
the terminal dialectic of credit expansion descending into military plutocratic
rapture psychology) kicks in, preventing darth vaders/ demons etc, eg our inflicting our apocalyptic
neuroses on the rest of the universe…
…(threatening
terminal collapse into unbridled irredeemable horror) unless
intelligent life gains mastery of itself (eg if we fail, any future descendants,
would as they develop & learn about us, would literally be driven insane by
the knowledge of what we had & pissed away – such that their own developing
knowledge would be their nemesis. All the marbles of 4 Billion years will be
decided on the turn of a single card, in the Battle of Jerusalem)...
(&
this has to be a conscious decision on the part of intelligent
life; as otherwise intelligent life would be no more than the slave of an all
controlling celestial Saddam Hussein as opposed to an independant entity/
consciousness - that however needs to tap into its creator/ God/ the supra
reserve of courage, in this ultimate pivotal struggle, to enable it to gain
mastery of itself)
& vis those that think, vis
development of a universalist civilization, that as Johnny come latelys, we
have nothing to contribute, would be remedial no hopers of no interest to any
advanced beings (with a million year or so headstart over us), perhaps
profoundest of all for us all to cling to as we approach our darkest hours, is
that those civilizations that have such a headstart, would know just what we
had to overcome within ourselves & externally, for us to develop the
technologies required to enable us to plug into the universalist network, &
however many times they witness such do so for the first time, it will never
ever fail to move them to the quick of their very souls – for this is what it
means to be truly conscious…
…& if ever they lost the sense
of that, they know their power would evaporate that very instant…
…for
such be our salvation, individually, collectively & universally…
Eg
USA apocalyptic expansionism can only be finally defeated
by USA visionary expansionism (eg most obviously, against
this extreme traumatic historical & cultural backdrop, search for
earthlike planets as well as solar powered desalination). & it is in this
peculiarly (British) American characteristic of this project,
that humanity attains full mastery it’s own destiny…
In conclusion, if
intelligent life must become God, does this not imply a creator???
& in what
way does intelligent life taking control of its’ own time to gain control of
universal time/ universe (& becoming God) actually demonstrate
existence/ role of a supreme being???
Intelligent life with
the capacity to become God emerged from pondscum as an independent entity &
was enslaved by the first great machine it ever created the war/ finance nexus…
…in order to prevent
itself being destroyed by its own creation (the 10,000 year old war/ finance
nexus) humanity must at the Battle of Jerusalem draw on the supra reserve of
courage to seek mastery of universal creation…
…which entails
establishing a (division between) a written secular constitution designed to
enable it to gain mastery of its own time in order to gain mastery of (the
unwritten universal constitution of) universal time per se, become God, our
cosmic parents (& visit the same crap on the next cosmic generation).
It is that because
(as we have seen) to prevent our (self) destruction by our own creation, such a
gigantic conscious (& therefore free will based) objective, eg intelligent
life (gaining mastery of its own time to gain mastery of universal time the
universe &) becoming God, is required; & that it is only enabled/ propelled
by such apocalyptic threats (descent into chaos unless consciousness gained
hegemony over matter - requiring such a conscious leap on pain of
oblivion), that free will becomes a decisive historic
factor enabling such a conscious leap
…which itself (because
such a conscious leap could not come about via stable linear
development) self evidently requires a transcendent connexion
(with our creator), humanity simply drawing on a (the) supra reserve of
courage, to enable such a conscious leap – to gain mastery of our
own creation …
& that this duel
imperative proves both the existence & role of a creator God (the self
evident duel necessity of our needing to gain mastery of our own time to gain
mastery of universal time, the universe & become God to avoid oblivion) &
the need for a transcendent connexion with our creator to enable us to make
the conscious leap; proving the existence of a creator God.
The
Qs raised by this…
(especially vis how the written
secular constitution enabling humanity to master its’ own time is both
imperative to understand AND distinct from the unwritten cosmic constitution –
vis how both Time Consciousness & Free Will Are one & the same from
BOTH the standpoints of the creator & the created)
…are dealt with in
more detail in `Paradoxes of the Human Soul’, & attempt to begin to deal
with the Q of the origins of the first God/ cosmic generation, is made in
Chapter 7 `The Edge of Beyond’…
Because it is a global
crash that self evidently overtakes everything & requires therefore
both comprehensive explanation of such a process and the
outline of a global solution to have any credibility…
This
means the Revolution is NOT national in its psycho political
conception/ sphere of operations. Therefore it is self
evidently not enough for the legitimacy of a national order
to simply collapse to summon into being a revolutionary
legitimacy/ order…
We have already
outlined the ultimate solution to this vis the Battle of
Jerusalem, vis the 4 billion year mindset & the division between the
written secular constitution - to
enable humanity to gain mastery of its time in order to comprehend the unwritten
cosmological (universal) constitution & gain mastery of God’s time
per se; become God our cosmic parents (& visit the same crap on the next
cosmic generation).
But the Q that arises
is, how do we get this project of the ground from its original
launchpad in the UK???
In this pivotal point
of history, it is necessary on occasion to seek answers in the fact that
there is no obvious answer.
The old order has lost
control & cannot restore it on the basis of its hegemony.
& the Revolution
cannot even get its project of the ground by itself because it cannot establish
its own legitimacy within the UK/ Great Britain in order to go global.
Therefore
by due process of elimination, we are left with the only possible
option/ answer – a nuclear shotgun wedding between the Revolution
& the old order based on the core paradox
.....that the (USA led)
military plutocratic elite depend on the Revolution to seize power (from the
war/ finance nexus/ machine they are the gilded slaves of), to save their
(everyone's) children: & that the Revolution (to avoid global annihilation)
is dependant on this factor & must tailor it's entire military pol/econ
framework accordingly...
Via a model based on actually
riding the shockwave
A) Correspondingly it is for
the old order to summon me when it has lost control…
(ELABORATE)
As with any good nuclear system however, this is a duel
key system.
I cannot be expected to snap to order just because some
agent of the Crown calls round, for example to request in opaque fashion that I
take part in a strategy of tension pretext for the USA war against Iran.
From my position 2 other criteria have to
be fulfilled:
I must have completed my
deep theoretical work/ produced provisional draft (largely derivative of same,
but also symbiotically developing same) of what I must say.
I must be convinced the old order has
lost control & correspondingly has no choice but to cooperate
with our gameplan on the basis of the core paradox…
& yet, as noted, pre Battle of
Jerusalem, there is NO global mandate for the new global security
architecture – for the corresponding geo pol/econ agendas – to provide a source
of global (confederal) & corresponding superstate (federal) constitutional
legitimacy – such as be required to hold the allegiance of the British
army, currently held together by the Crown, keeping the hostile
parties apart long enough to allow for said process to be
established…
HOW on earth can this be resolved?
When neither the old order nor the
Revolution can in this crash/ launch period, hold the psycho political centre by
their respective selves???
The Q is ultimately reduceable to:
Q HOW do you simultaneously
attain the consent of both people AND Crown???
Eg without the latter, the former will instinctively
sense the unviability of your project – even if they cannot
understand why.
B) We make our pitch to the braying mobs as per the `battle of
London’ Speech…
…& we are taken hostage by the mob (in exchange for
suspension of atrocities) UNTIL the Crown gives assent to our role, which it only
gives once it has got confirmation from the relevant heads of state to sign up
to the project – if it fails to do this, I am executed by the mob & the
mayhem continues unto oblivion.
C) The confirmation from the Crown sets up a dynamic process centred
around the universities – as provisional co-ordinating centres vis the Battle
of Jerusalem gameplan…
The pivotal strategic
objective is to capture universities as focal points for establishment of
provisional govt (when geo pol/econ meltdown transpires) able to martial the
broadest swathes/ loyalty/ reluctant grudging support of civil society...
…in conunction with the
aforementioned Jerusalem centred focus gyrostabilising…
…the de-ideologised
`Revolution in security’ - necessary to maintain order; in the context of
(& to resolve) unfolding geo pol/econ chaos...
For we are stuck between 2
iron laws, `we are where we are' & `we need to be where we need to be'.
& (as history has decreed that we deserve each other) we are all stuck with
each other for company, as we try to carve out the path from the one to the
other...
D) This centres around the first of 3 great interlinked trials
So while it is
neccessary to bring a sufficient minimum to trial of the (British) military
plutocratic elite, the key to this is in the view we take of the trial of (a
necessary minimum of) the (British) military plutocratic elite…
To demonstrate our burning bridges with the old way of
doing things (to lesser breeds without the law)…
& that we see our security/
future as being entirely dependant upon the establishment/ consolidation of a
geo strategic/ security framework & in turn a single global constitutional
geo pol/econ framework/ settlement – gaurenteeing every people’s legitimate
security concerns.
…without which we will not be able
to hold the center (eg vis Israel/ Palestine to begin process of developing
said geo security framework – see `Communique Number 1’; or even at home) in
the interim – to enable such to be established.
…which must exclude the British Army
(but not the Crown) from this process (as needed vis Israel/ Palestine etc…)…
…the capital political
responsibility for whose action is shared by BOTH
the Crown/ senior reps (eg political & institutional figureheads of state
itself, eg MI5/6 & against backdrop of econ chaos, some of the high &
dry speculators – whose interest determined the geo pol/econ agenda) & AND the revolutionary
political figurehead orchestrating this process,
beginning in London – moving
as rapidly as possible to Jerusalem which must at all times be the psycho
political focus of the process
Eg this less & less
appears as a conventional trial or (such as I originally envisaged several
years ago) even a conventional political trial, at all…
…& more about,
illustrating to the whole world how/ why we all find ourselves embroiled in
this process vis the climactic end of 10,000 years of the war/ finance nexus
(itself the climax of 4 billion years of primordial Earth evolution), in which
humanity must finally (confronted by apocalyptic threats of its own making)
gain conscious mastery of its’ own creation/ collective destiny or perish;
& how by all accepting our responsibility, we can use said
apocalyptic breakdown of the war/ finance nexus to propel new global security/
consitutional/ pol/econ frameworks/ settlement enabling us to
finally gain mastery of our collective destiny.
Eg Free will only
becomes a hegemonic factor once all potential for automatic development on
basis of the 10,000 year old war/ finance nexus is exhausted.
Until
then, we could (within limits) chose what role we played, but not
the rules of the game…
…for only the final
exhaustion of all potential for development on basis of (war finance nexus eg)hegemony
of matter over (human) consciousness makes free will a decisive
hegemonic factor ..
Eg to use
the apocalyptic threats to propel the geo cultural/ constitutional/ pol/econ
antidote to said threats…
…to establish law, the primacy
of civil society consciousness over its’ own creation…
Q How does this differ from
a normal trial?
Because it is not
just about a particular criminal act committed in a given time & place by a
given individual/ group…
But about humanity
facing up collectively to the collective problems
derivative from its’ entire evolution/ development – across 4
billion years of evolution, the struggle of consciousness to emerge/ gain
primacy over the dust/ matter from which it emerged.
That the first great
machine it ever created/ that propelled its development (the 10,000 year old
war/ finance nexus) enslaved it…
That in the final
epoch of war/ finance nexus, we are all holding weapons of
mass destruction of countless different forms eg: nuke/ bio chemical,
environmental, ideological, trade & geo political, parochial/ ignorance,
indifference etc.
…that threaten
wholesale oblivion…
…& that while as a
first step, executing some gilded slaves of the war/ finance
nexus, is necessary to confirm our intentions/ the mere beginnings of a
directional shift to the world & to ourselves, it is not by any means the
most difficult task on the long road to global salvation that confronts us (in
dismantling all said weapons of mass destruction in all their forms)...
…that it should be understood
as a necessary but strictly delimited first step in the general perspective of
the tasks that confront collective humanity & absolutely nothing more…
This is
why the trial of the military plutocratic elite is merely the first
of 3 great inter linked trials; eg of military plutocratic elite/ hegemony, secondly
of myself (as outlined in the section: `The Battler of Jerusalem’) to set the
geo security agenda in which the 3rd great trial `The
Battle of Jerusalem’, eg of all humanity itself, is challenged to pro
actively embrace (take ownership of) what it will take to seize control
of its own conscious destiny – on pain of oblivion if it does not…
Vis the crown, the dreadful inescapable conclusion be that the method of execution must match the measures deployed by the British army against Palestinians trying to breech the Israeli border (unacceptable under ANY circumstances whatsoever).
…(with all the kit Thatcher & co
sold Saudi in the interests of national security – alerting Israeli missile
command)
….or the last settlment
before gaurentees given by Pakistan about dismantling nukes (as
outlined in the section: `The Battle of Jerusalem’)…
…which would set in train a terminal
unrestrained psycho political momentum to go all the way & drive Israel into
the sea. Certainly such would not have been & needs to be cauterized as
part of the process – by Pakistan nuke disarmament demorilising Islamic fascist
psychology.
…so that such will not
precipitate general war/ total collapse, but rather be channeled into
the incipient constitutional/ legal framework/ process (outlined in
section: `The Battle of Jerusalem’) of security trade offs, forced
through under threat of MAD/ global apocalyptic anarchy…
Eg to lengthen the psycho political fuses of
the hostile parties in Israel/ Palestine (& the region/ world generally);
to enable this, the political commander of the British army in Israel/
Palestine is personally stuck with the task of carrying out this murder of part
of every one of 60 million British people, even of all humanity.
Eg if such is not
done, then Palestinians/ Arabs will certainly accept British role in overseeing
establishment of a Palestinian state, but without the geo strategic
caveats required to prevent geo psycho political momentum developing a terminal
velocity, such that any attempt to stop such will result in oil being
turned of & general war, as oppose to the trials & corresponding global
security exchange that must be set up vis the global psycho political Battle of
Jerusalem decisively eclipsing the role of the military as a hegemonic factor –
exploiting the threat of MAD to engineer single global security/ constitutional
framework – held together by the very threat of apocalyptic anarchy….
E) But before the murder of the Crown & Heir (necessary to
convince the whole world we have burned our bridges with any delusion in
reconsolidating the old geo pol/econ agenda), we (must) get agreement to the
Jerusalem centred gameplan from the relevant geo strategic factors.
As noted, as info will perish without the oil, & oil
is useless without the information (as the loss of such would lead to the
descent into primal panic/ collapse of civilisation, crash of industrial
agriculture, with all that entails…), the key objective is to establish the
common ownership of information in exchange for the oil remaining on long
enough to effect the transition to solar powered microgeneration.
This entails establishment of a global reserve bank of
Jerusalem, to literally pump liquidity (oil & gas) into the market (to keep
the info alive) before the means to pay for such actually exist (the $$$ fiat
currency having crashed). Establishing in effect a single global energy based
currency (gold being inherently deflationary & no one being willing to trust
fiat currencies anymore).
THIS in turn further encourages the
development of solar powered microgeneration as this consolidates (global)
civil society’s control over the global financial system. (eg a gold based
currency can by core elite manouevering, be decoupled from its metallic base
& become again, a fiat currency underpinned by insane force of nuclear arms
by a tiny elite seeking geo strategic/ global domination. Which the world
cannot survive again), breaking permanently the power of the
energy barons, the national security elites in their control & the
financiers able to pull the strings by default consequance as a result; &
replacing it with the substantive sovereignty of the individual, pooled to
effect control over the agenda of their state & political economy.
But as noted we need the establishment of a new global
security architecture to keep the project on track/ prevent/ cut dead, any
delusional attempt to restore the old military plutocratic order.
But before the murder of the Crown &
Heir etc (no more bloodshed than is absolutely necessary to convince the whole
world we have burned our bridges with any delusion in reconsolidating the old
geo pol/econ agenda), we must get agreement to the above program & the
Jerusalem centred gameplan from the relevant geo strategic factors.
In the context of the
unfolding chaos (as Kissinger would put it), `wonderfully concentrating the
mind in the absence of alternatives’, & based on the principle that we can
always die tomorrow if the plan doesn’t work, so give it a chance therefore.
The most explosive issue is the calculated management
in advance of the (aforementioned) impasse that leads to the (aforementioned)
Battle of Jerusalem.
The key Q is WHEN Israel (co-ordinating
with the USA) must make its stand against further removal of
settlements without wider geo strategic gaurentees on its security, triggering
the impasse that leads to British troops opening fire on Palestinians & the
Battle of Jerusalem.
Eg if it were to do so after say only half the
settlements removed, then we would have the geo psychological feel that we are
so far removed from resolution, that it definitely will not work.
Therefore we need 90-95% (down to
the wire) settlement removal
(prior to the Battle ofJerusalem) to emphasise Israel’s
legitimate need for wider security gaurentees.
Prior non cooperation from Israel leads to
the use of the oil weapon with obvious repercussions for USA/ Israel etc.
Against this backdrop, Israel/ USA should choose the last
5-10% of settlements where the line is drawn for the Battle of Jerusalem, where
without aforementioned geo strategic gaurentees, Israeli missile command will
kick in triggering also global annihilation of Israel, USA, the mideast,
everybody – to concentrate everyone’s attention.
The key thing is, we cannot ask the Arabs etc to turn the
oil back on (& nor will they) until the USA has told the
Israelis where to draw the line. Rather we have no choice but to watch our own
(& everybody else’s) country burn until the USA has so
committed Israel to this path that the project can begin.
Q WHY the emphasis on British troops, instead of an international force including Cubans/ Venezuelans?
Because we need a force that is prepared to & will (when needs must) open fire on the Palestinians (vis the aforementioned unavoidable impasse) to prevent Israeli missile command kicking in.
The idea is that British troops act as a buffer between Israel/ Palestine; & as a defence for Israel as it hands back Palestinian land to prevent Israeli missile command kicking in.
The Cubans clearly cannot be relied upon to do this. & indeed if they were positioned to & did so, that would undermine their role post Battle of Jerusalem…
…which is
to act as a mutual reassurance within the framework of a consolidated global
security architecture in which they absolutely CAN be relied upon
to do whatever is required of them.
F) Murder of the Crown & Heir psycho politically locks the
focus of all humanity into the Jerusalem centred crucible…
Bearing in mind the
army traditionally needs a stable fixed point to owe allegiance to (a crown or
an established constitution) to avoid anarchy, to what does the army owe
allegiance to in a world of flux???
The answer to this Q is
suggested only by the complete & utter lack of any other
options.
For it is not just the
army that needs such a focus but all British/ Euro civil society. Not just
British/ euro civil society, but the whole world.
The only
way to resolve this defining dilemma of the interregnum, is for Crown
Authority to last 1 year AND NO MORE THAN 1 YEAR AFTER
the murder of the Crown – long enough to get to the Battle of Jerusalem/
establish (new) global constitutional authority/ legitimacy by the eclipse of
the paradox of arms by the mother’s vanguard (& my execution – consolidating
legal authority - as outlined in Chapter 1); but NOT so long as
to cause the Jerusalem centred focus to be lost – which would spell chaos/
oblivion…
This actually must
entail the Crown consenting, for the good of humanity, to confer
such temporary/ transitional authority to enable this process to take place.
This transitional (Crown) authority must actually be the basis of global
transitional legitimacy. Its’ supremely unsatisfactory character actually
serving as an aid/ focus for the Jerusalem centred process/ Battle of
Jerusalem.
Such are the means by
which the paradoxes of 4 billion years of earth evolution must be resolved.
As to the Q HOW does
this relate to the establishment of the Bank of Jerusalem?
The agreement to
establish the Bank of Jerusalem to keep the oil on in exchange for common
ownership of info; long enough to effect the aforementioned geo pol/econ
transition to solar pwered microgeneration must be finalized before my murder
of the Crown (as outlined) – leading to my immediate exile to Jerusalem as
political commander of the british Army – to effect the establishment of the
new global security architecture via battle of Jerusalem (through the medium of
resolution of the Israel/ Paliestine conflict as outlined in Chapter 2).
& vis the social
revolution in security, the leveraged force of the military
plutocratic war/ finance nexus, based on core elite info control
and corresponding surveillance structures will have irretrievably
broken down.
Will cease to be
acceptable to attempt to re-introduce such in the context of the
crash…
Therefore
openness of objectives/ gameplan – esp centred by the Battle of Jerusalem
& corresponding transitional/ ultimate geo strategic/
constitutional & geo pol/econ objectives – is imperative to gyrostabilise
the geo political psychology to avoid immediate anarchy…
Furthermore the nuclear
shotgun wedding between the old order & the Revolution, means a much
lower tolerance for secrecy than if say a clear revolutionary
legitimacy had been established within the UK; able to invoke
revolutionary patriotism as cover, `the country in danger’.
To the Q, HOW on
earth can you possibly expect the army to function under such conditions?
Consider first,
how on earth (vis the crash) civil society can possibly begin to
function, & define the role of the army in relation to such, to prevent
hostile elements from tearing each other to pieces for just long enough to
allow the revolution settlement to kick in…
To a certain extent the
soldiery vis the families/ communities share much of the outrage, so the
challenge will be in the midst of such to preserve as much as can
be, of the old structures of the army as possible – this being the least (however
great) line of historic resistance.
BOTH
these factors in turn sets the terms of the new global security agenda. We (in the
west) begin by opening up our secret archives showing all our dark deeds etc
especially to ourselves vis depleted uranium with its half life of 4.5 billion
years – the horrors of which, in degrading all human/ animal DNA
(eg horrific birth malformations etc), etched onto our souls represent our
unspeakable own fate if we do not move
beyond the military plutocratic agenda of the war/finance nexus.
It is perfectly true
that 3rd world revanchist/ nationalist elements will attempt to play
up our (perfectly genuine) misdeeds to their peoples as cover to avoid opening
up their own dark archives.
We therefore from the
security standpoint, all other options being historically closed of to us, have
no choice but to turn an unavoidable imperative into a strategic virtue…
…certainly not to
effect `regime change’ by imperial aggression (an option thankfully dead forever)
with fraudulent democratic grand facades; but rather, to replicate the basic
DNA – based on the common ownership of info which naturally seeks consolidation
through solar powered microgeneration & with the substantive sovereignty of
the individual increasingly possessed of such strategic depth seeks to effect
ever greater command of its pooled/ collective destiny - finding its own forms appropriate to the
geo political terrain out of which such emerges; yet linked into said
overarching culture….
Eg key point, in the interim, Britain can
only avoid anarchy/ hold together transitionally if defined by objective
of global security framework centred on Jerusalem
Eg it is the very lack of a
viable British constitutional settlement that impels such a Jerusalem centred
framework – to prevent anarchy…
Even Europe (into which Euro Commonwealth
of the regions of Europe, Britain must dissolve itself) can only avoid the
various brushfires springing up turning into raging firestorms which will
consume it utterly, if it is redefined as the backbone of the Global
Commonwealth Confederation – enabling (middle eastern) Medina commonwealth/
South Asia to act (as outlined in `Battle of Jerusalem’) as
checks against USA rapture psychology – eclipsing USA apocalyptic expansionism
in order that USA visionary expansionism can save the world vis solar powered
desalination & the universalist conception…
…Eg the nation state is too small to tame
global finance hegemony (of war/ finance nexus); & too big to be a peaceful
region; therefore unless redefined for such purposes, to enable transition to
geo constitutional blocks able to act as bulwark components (establishing
balance of power) against the power of both global finance hegemony & any
individual leviathan deluding itself that it can dominate the world/
sleepwalking into some variant of apocalyptic rapture psychology, inexorably
prone to hegemonic manipulation by same & anarchy/ collapse (as well
as, in order to keep the geo pol/econ agenda centred on global reconstruction,
especially solar powered desalination)…
G) Leading up to the Battle of Jerusalem – which if all goes
according to plan, mandates the establishment of a new global security
architecture – consolidated by my execution.
In slightly modified form
William Blake’s `Jerusalem’ also serving as the emergent global anthem (words
to the effect of: `throughout our planets’ green & pleasant
land…’)
Helping to fix geo
psycho political focus on Jerusalem/ Battle of Jerusalem…
This way, we shift the
focus away from (no longer viable) static fixed points (in people’s minds) to
(as is necessary in state of apocalyptic flux) a gyrostabilised vision
– propelled by the apocalyptic chaos, & centred on its only
viable geo strategic point of consolidation, Jerusalem.
Said anthem (Jerusalem)
can also function as a key (even decisive) weapon at the aforementioned Battle
of Jerusalem – giving everyone a button to cancel out the nuclear buttons, by
registering support for the alternatives – though the words will only recover
their sweetness at the point when the Battle of Jerusalem takes root in
everyone’s soul…
…in conclusion, it is
this point on the edge of humanity, when the old order cannot hold the center,
& the new has yet to establish its’ global legitimacy; & be so
unimagineably hated for doing what needs must in order to enable it to begin to
do so, that is the most perilous of all in human history. For it represents the
gravest threat of a tip into outright inhumanity/ oblivion on the one hand;
against the absolute certainty of doing so if we refuse the leap.
3 The (Global Reserve)
Bank of Jerusalem
What is the relationship between new global
security architecture & the (Global Reserve) Bank of Jerusalem?
As noted in Chapter 1 (`The Post Petrodollar Revolution
Settlement’), the purpose of the Bank of Jerusalem is to re-engineer the
entire global political economy through establishment of a single global energy
based (instead of gold or fiat) currency.
Which entails
literally pumping liquidity (oil/gas before the means to pay for
them have been developed) into the market to buy time to effect (with a WARTIME
will) the global transition to solar power microgeneration.
In exchange for which USA/ Europe etc agree to accept the
constraints of a new global security architecture/ constitution.
As seen in Chapter 2 the price of consolidating
the globally pivotal Medina (oil) superstate will be Jewish admin of Mecca (as
muslims do with Christian Sepulchre, to prevent general war among Christian
factions) to prevent warring Sunni/ Shia factions razing Mecca (again) or
entire region, when Israel has woken up to threat of USA Rapture
psychology as per `Revelations7:4'.
…including the establishment of the Common
Ownership of Information…
For without oil in the pre solar microgeneration interregnum, info cannot be sustained (will be lost forever plunging humanity into oblivion) & post petrodollar, oil cannot be given away for nothing.
Therefore
oil for common ownership of info – with all the myriad evils/ problems (in the
pre solar microgeneration interregnum) is both the lesser evil
& the greater good.
& also has the advantage of pushing the world towards
solar power microgeneration as a stabilising factor.
…the consequent substantive sovereignty of the individual
(with
control of own energy & info providing strategic power in depth –
breaking permanently baronial forms of energy control/ corresponding national
security politics & the military plutocratic classes whose power is
entrenched by such an unassailable agenda)
enabling the (effective pooling of this sovereignty to) control of direction of their state & econ; stabilising the wielding of this info.,
Eg consolidating (the strict division between) the written
secular constitution, the pivotal/ defining purpose of which is to
insure ALL humanity has (ever increasing) control/ mastery of its
own time, in order to comprehend the unwritten universal
(cosmological) constitution - to traverse the universe & ultimately gain
mastery of God’s time/ creation…
Time Consciousness & Free Will being one & the same from the standpoint of the creator & created
Eg consciousness emerged from
dust as an independent entity, but to
avoid being destroyed by its own creation, the 10,000 year
old war finance nexus we are still slaves of, must draw on the supra
reserve of courage, to gain mastery of itself, the pivotal
point of 4 Billion years of earth evolution...
…become
God/ our cosmic parents & visit the same torment on the next cosmic
generation.
Socialism = Common ownership of info stabilised
by solar power microgeneration.
MIT of Boston has developed a wind up Wi-Fi laptop
that can be built $100 (pre crash) a piece. 20 million can be produced for the cost
of a single B2 bomber – giving access (with common ownership of info) to more
info than in the British Library to all who possess such (1000 CDs for $100,
enough for over 100,000 books, worth pre crash $millions to every Mexican,
Andean, Middle eastern, Afghan, African peasant etc).
But (as noted) in order to do this, we must establish
amidst the chaos, the new global security architecture…
(to provide framework of
gaurentees that USA/ Europe/ others will not at the first opportunity `revert
to type’ & attempt to establish a new tyranny that would have the effect of
triggering a multi level multi faceted MAD response from all quarters – leading
to global extinction).
…via
the geo psycho political focus of the Battle of Jerusalem – providing a kind of
barely sufficient default confidence…
(eg as it is self evident that
this is the only hope of avoiding oblivion, the risk of the enterprise being
offset by the certainty of oblivion/ primal panic/ collapse of food
distribution/ cannibalism/ extinction; which none shall escape, if such a
project is NOT undertaken)
…necessary
for such an institution to be set up.
As
to the Qs when/ how/ under what circumstances is the Bank of Jerusalem to be
established?
The
agreement (to keep the oil on long enough to effect the aforementioned geo
pol/econ transition) must be finalised before my murder of
the Crown (as outlined in Chapter 3) – leading to my immediate exile to
Jerusalem as political commander of the British Army – to effect the
establishment of new global security architecture via battle of Jerusalem
(through the medium of resolution of the Israel/ Palestine conflict as outlined
in Chapter 2).
These 2 gigantic institutions while (clearly) mutually
dependent are actually strikingly separate.
You might suppose that the Bank of Jerusalem is the more
obviously powerful/ able to bring immediate pressure to bear. But
until the new global security architecture is established/
consolidated, while it has immense power to threaten to (to actually) bring the
whole game crashing down, it must use such power extremely judiciously, to support
the establishment of new global security architecture – to gaurentee its long
term investment. Or else, it simply destroys itself.
For the Bank of Jerusalem is itself an immensely top
heavy unstable structure peculiar to the post petrodollar interregnum –
when capitalism is revealed to have cannibalised its (real) financial capital
(through malinvestment – eg in speculation/ credit expansion propelled by the
petrodollar) & yet the structures of socialism – Common
Ownership of Info stabilised by solar power microgeneration
(the transcendent practicality ELABORATE)…
…do not yet exist…
The Bank of Jerusalem is in essence a socialist
capitalist structure. Its anxious shareholders are the citizenry of
especially the various oil states – who have a vested interest in both
the stability/ establishment of new global security architecture and
the post petrodollar revolution settlement; whose fundamental interests differ
little therefore, from those of the rest of humanity…
…it is only for such therefore, that we can convince them
not to torch the global hall at the Extraordinary General Meeting
in permanent session – pre consolidation.
For we are all sick of the hegemony of petro elites. It
may be true (putting to one side the prospect of planetary eco Armageddon) that
plentiful reserves of super heavy oil are workable at a high
price. But only at the
expense of giving the petroleum magnates (& weapons manufacturers/ coterie
of national security state power brokers – the `overworld’) ever more
power over the entire geo pol/econ agenda…
& we wish to move away from such in such fashion as
gives civil society control of every sphere of its destiny – control over its
own info, its geo pol/econ policy/ stabilise migration – indeed patterns of
development that in themselves are (in aggregate terms) cheaper because
they give us control of such & therefore we do not incur the maniacal
expenses for the pyramid financial excesses of a mythologically myopic military
plutocratic tyranny.
So to engineer/ propel this process, the historic task of
the Bank of Jerusalem therefore is to enable/ encourage global citizenry to
literally mint their own currency, by producing their own (solar power
microgeneration) energy – to consolidate the Revolution & with it, to
conserve all that has been learnt over 10,000 years of the war/ finance
nexus, 100,000 years modern humanity, 10 million years of hominid existence
& 4 Billion years earth evolution.
4 The Jihad For the
Global
Constitution
The first task of the institutionalised social Revolution
in security, is to save the info & to establish/ extend/ deepen the common
ownership of info (in exchange for the oil remaining on long enough to effect
the transition to) & consolidate/ stabilise this via the transcendent
practicality, solar powered microgeneration
This combo establishing the substantive sovereignty
of the individual…
…Enabling its pooling to establish effective control over
the currency and with it the state & economy…
(Meyer Rothschild: `Give me control over a nations’ currency & I care not who writes its laws’)
…representing the consolidation of the
Revolution…
expressed via
the permanent constitutional bridling of finance to serve (regional/
superstate/ global) civil society (instead of global civil society being under
the hegemonic imperium of the war/ finance nexus), through a new constitutional
division of power…
...through elected
Workers Pension Councils - a permanent bulwark against destructive finance
speculation, thus freeing parliaments from plutocratic hegemony; & setting
the global investment agenda within parliaments (redistributive/ social wage
geared) tax regime - a constitutional division of power between the twin
pillars of state…
…the substantive sovereignty
of the individual representing both the consolidation (3rd
institutional pillar) of the Revolution AND an institutional
counterweight.
The written constitutional
framework defined by the aforementioned Universalist Conception.
Including vis culture of the common
threats/ objectives confronting all humanity eg threat of a mini ice age – vis
flooding of gulf stream warm water currents with glacial freshwater turning
them off…
…necessitating development of Africa
as our global insurance policy, in turn dependant on solar powered decentralist
development
Based
on the basic social econ unit as a freestanding unit – access to energy, water
& info giving it strategic depth, consequently also able to pool
sovereignty & therefore see of all security threats from predatory
warlords/ magnates that have no mandate from the pooled sovereignty of wider
humanity
Precisely
it be only via such that especially impenetrable Africa could be
in any way (however destructively) be opened up – as only such had the levers
(of war/ finance) to do so – the sheer impenetrable vastness of Africa in
particular overwhelming humanity’s attempts to master the territory. territory.
Hence
any attempt to copy the conventional model of development must
fail – even any significant wealth generation develops such internal migration
across wide & porous borders (increasingly a problem for the west –
ironically prior to its geo pol/econ crash) as to overwhelm same.
Unless,
development based much more (though not exclusively) on the freestanding social
econ unit (energy/ water/ info), so that there is both not
principally any boomtown locale to flood into, AND people know
they will be made use of/ be able to develop.
Thus
the balance of power will come to lie not in New York, London or even
Jerusalem. But in the hands of the sovereign individual.
& as a model which the whole
world must adopt as a framework of development (eg India’s jugular the glacial
River Ganges threatened with extinction – therefore solar powered desalination
necessary as both a fallback and to enable development without
destroying the Ganges – similar for China with its insane policy (as at
27/7/05) to build 600 new coal fired powerstations & Europe/ USA itself.
Thus by enabling hitherto
impenetrable planet Africa to be colonized by the Africans & the world to
be developed increasingly less via logic of the war/ finance nexus &more on
decentralist development, we forge also the developmental techniques and above
all, the mindset of a truly space faring civilization – which by definition can
only be begin or fail on our own home world, not by inflicting
our apocalyptic neuroses on the rest of the universe.
…which in practical
terms is about insuring for all humanity a progressive mastery over its own
time, to enable education/ accummalation of knowledge – driven by the
overarching culture of the common threats/ objectives confronting all humanity
(bridling egos to a common purpose), & to comprehend the unwritten
(cosmological) universal constitution, to ultimately to gain mastery over God’s
time per se – drawing on the supra
reserve of courage to gain mastery of God’s creation to avoid being destroyed
by its’ own creation (the 10,000 year old war finance nexus)…
…is imperative to consolidate the
(aforementioned) institutionalisation of the social revolution in security…
brought about by the collapse of the leveraged power of the military plutocratic elite
…prevent it running amok on the one hand, or any (fatal)
attempt to restore the old military plutocratic imperium on the other.
Eg because (as noted from chapter 2) there
is no framework of national legitimacy to validate the revolution
– it can only be gyrostabilised by a transcendent vision, the
division (which progressively liquidates the division between classes &
ethno national tribal factions – the
division) between the written secular constitution & (to enable us
to comprehend) the unwritten universal constitution.
Correspondingly, the institutionalised
social revolution in security must consolidate the
(aforementioned) global security architecture.
Eg as the power to create ever increasingly
brings with it the power to destroy; this impels:
1) Wider engagement of wider
civil society with ever increasing control of its own time…
2)…directing the
conscious development of such (especially) via the universities.
Eg these defining objectives vis
the culture of the universalist conception, are absolutely imperative in
enabling humanity to (just about) hold itself together (in the extreme turmoil
following the aforementioned crash of the military plutocratic system) at ALL
stages of the revolutionary transition before & after the Battle of Jerusalem…
Including in
developing/ extending the nuclear shotgun wedding globally in
order to (aid development of global security architecture &) stabilise the
emergent common ownership of information – in a context in which the old
structures will have collapsed/ be in freefall to the extent that secrecy
of any kind (if not to be simply displaced/ replaced by unbelievably savage
warlordisms) will have to justify its role, if it is to function as a
transitional aid to order…
…eg specifically as a
lever to enable new global security architecture to be established - enabling
solar powered desalination (eg solar powered desalination enabling substantive
sovereignty of the individual thus stabilising common
ownership of info = Socialism).
EUROPE
As will become clearer
in the history section(s), we are all responsible for this nightmare & even
for closing down the options others had leading to criminal choices/ logic. But
the scale & demands of the objective of enabling humanity to gain mastery
over its own time, & through this universal time, so dwarfs the old hatreds
that it is precisely by deploying every nerve & fibre of our being to this
collective survival logic, that humanity can just about make it through to the
broad sunlit uplands…
Britain (barely)
stabilised by Jerusalem centred focus, & threatened by Europe’s bushfires,
must spread the nuclear shotgun wedding (via Battle of London) to Europe via
the Battle of Berlin…
Which in spreading the
nuclear shotgun wedding by combining the strategic repression of resurgent
classical fascists…
Eg due to residual fear of Germany
& Germany’s fear of Germany, the British must so prepare a Germanic led
European people for their destiny
…with the
re-orientation of Europe to Jerusalem (all such geo political orientation/ gyro
stabilization by the pre Battle of Jerusalem focus, is defacto stabilized by
aforementioned transitional Crown Authority pre Battle of Jerusalem), the
forging of the global security architecture & Europe’s role in
leading the constitutional consolidation of such – which however, while
battle of Berlin can/ must temporarily stabilise Europe for just long
enough to prevent descent into anarchy until the battle
of Jerusalem, it is only the global conscious context of the latter that enables
Europe to so redefine itself (eclipsing the battle of London)
& by definition if
Britain must lead this process, ULSTER must lead it…
As
(since Sept 11th, Iraq war, increasingly unsustainable immigration flows into mainland
Britain) the mainland classical fascist psychology/ focus is now so absorbed by
mainland ethnic minorities; it is increasingly inconceivable in the context of
the geo pol/econ crash that Republicans be increasingly smashed (vis collapse
of the peace boom & assertion of the right to commit genocide within our
own borders) & then the classical fascists shift focus towards ethnic
minorities.
Rather the latter so absorb the classical fascist focus, that Loyalists stuck
on their own without any state support & driven out (& onto the
mainland to re-inforce the onslaught against the ethnic minorities) by the
Irish Army. This is of course excessively optimistic as geo pol/econ collapse/
primal panic will have led to social liquification before such stately ambitions
can be realised…
Pre
Sept 11th I had been geared up to the idea that the global speculative finance/
credit expansion propelled USA budget/ trade deficit would lead to dollar
collapse/ soaring interest rates/ global credit crunch/ hyperinflation &
geo pol/econ tailspin collapsing the Ulster peaceboom leading to war gathering
its own momentum, spilling over onto the mainland & merging with Tory anti
EU political warlordism (the right to commit genocide within our own borders) –
the need to combat such via paramilitary attacks on classical fascist
formations (military & political), & take the attack to the enemy via a
rev pol campaign held together as a continuous process by antifascist hunger
strikers (as focal point of the campaign – enabling the delegitimisation of the
regime/ continuous martialing of forces) – re-inforced by parliamentary wing in
event of elections being called to relegitimise the regime/ fraction of such.
As
this would only work on a European scale, to establish a Euro Commonwealth of
the regions eclipsing the nation state (too weak to establish civil society
hegemony over global finance – yet too big to be a peaceful region) &
defined for a Global Commonwealth Confederation to contain the threat from USA
caesarism etc in turn defined for the Green Revolution (wartime sacrifices for
solar powered desalination to quench the thirst for revenge from the 3rd world/
stabilise the immigration Q by aiding development of 3rd world), this
necessitated the export of the methodology by British antifascists via Battle
of Berlin to fix the centre of gravity of Euro Commonwealth be breaking the
threat where most feared in Europe (paradoxically as Germany afraid Germany, it
would only be the British awakening the Germanic regions to their historic role
as backbone of Euro Commonwealth, leading Europe, leading the world, which
would psycho politically enable them to so take the initiative; & which
gyro stabilising vision would enable unification of Ireland within a Euro
Commonwealth, providing a new covenant of security for Loyalists replacing the
old collapsed nation state based based security construct).
I
had (pre Sept 11th 2001) partially developed/ regeared to a subscenario whereby
anticipated explosive growth of BNP in April 2002 local elections necessitated
a containing/ pre-emptive strike in case of major electoral breakthrough
(otherwise the combination of a major advance combined with economic tailspin
would have threatened a (psycho) military political rout; if not contained be a
position prepared before the geo pol/econ crash.
Since
Sept 11th , the changed psycho political focus decisively shifting attention
away from USA budget/ trade deficit (finance scandals/ crises feeding of
themselves & merging into a single firestorm catalysing meltdown), the
Ulster Q became a backwater, & the new conditions did not permit the BNP to
raise the stake required to play the ultimate game - establishing a paradoxical period of apocalyptic stability.
A parochialism that is
paradoxically best positioned & motivated to eclipse parochialism, &
knows best (especially Billy Hutchinson) how to put out the brushfires…
Indeed the very
concerns raised about its leadership, insure that in order to maintain the
seperation of powers…
…Europe follows through
in leading establishment of global constitutional framework
Eg the fusion/
expression of Europe’s global constitutional leadership, consolidating the new
global security architecture via its global institutional commitment to solar
powered desalination/ decentralist development; is European Commonwealth
intervention in South Africa after the Battle of Jerusalem…
The
commitment of European peacekeeping forces preventing genocidal slaughter of
the white minority in South Africa for just long enough to allow the rev
settlement to kick in…
…eg the very fact that
Europe seriously risks its blood in so doing, insures that European state
forces become an institutional bulwark for pushing said general framework of
rev reconstruction, to insure the security/ survival of European troops…
Compelling
Europe in turn forge its entire constitution/ pol/econ around the
objective of developing solar powered desalination/ decentralist development.
So that Africa can function as Europe/ North’s insurance policy – vis threat of
a mini ice age – galvinising African political psychology around a role that
gives it an increasing sense of purpose as it develops; enabling it to
transcend the psycho political drag factor of its vast interior… with a
universalist vision increasingly cast outwards towards the stars, contact with
intelligent life throughout the universe, to intelligent life becoming God
& visiting the same crap on the next cosmic generation…
Q while mothers’ movement enables eclipse
of paradox of arms, endorses global security architecture, particularly drive
for solar powered desalination, making possible European commitment in South
Africa WHAT (given the backdrop of the Iraq catastrophe) actually
compels it???
It is the CONSCIOUS
realisation that if Europe does not project itself outwards at
the critical geo pol/econ point (to re-inforce the global security architecture
with the new global constitutional agenda/ pol/econ framework to re-inforce the
global culture of the common threats/ objectives confronting all humanity)
Europe will turn inwards & devour itself…
Eg it is Europe’s own
extremely perilous instability that helps propel/ drive this process…
As regards the
identification of the key point, as the flashpoint between black & white
& its contentiousness, THIS is what helps compel Europe to
re-inforce its armies with WARTIME sacrifices for reconstruction
specifically solar powered desalination – a process that must be fought with
all the desperate survival logic of an all out war…
Paradoxically, it is
only by committing our armies to peacekeeping in South Africa…
…thus shifting the entire
geo constitutional pol/econ focus of Europe & with it the world to the geo
pol/econ solution that underpins the security of its troops, solar powered
desalination based for global security…
…that European (ethno
national based) fratricidal strife is eclipsed & the spectre of a golden
horde from the collapse of the Russia/ China (to say nothing of a vast array of
other apocalyptic dynamics) can be addressed by providing geo pol/econ points
of support to enable corresponding geo constitutional frameworks
(we will now outline) to be established in Russia, USA, Medina Commonwealth,
South Asia & China.
As to the Q How is Europe
temporarily stabilised before the battle of Jerusalem???
Perhaps the point is it barely can
be, & this is what gives the battle of Jerusalem its decisive focus/ power
– eg if Europe could be so stabilised, it would imply it could hold together
without the battle of Jerusalem at least to the degree that it develops a
sufficiently complacent attitude to the Battle of Jerusalem that Europe
unquestionably would not be desperate enough to respond to it, it would fail
& thence later Europe descends into chaos.
Q But
why given the nuclear shotgun wedding, is this necessary???
Actually, it is the decisive
expression of the nuclear shotgun wedding. The old state cannot hold together
& the new state (vis both Battle of Jerusalem & the revolution
settlement that has not yet kicked in) cannot yet hold the centre…
It corresponds/ is integral to the
revolutionary calculus of force, that force cannot be used to conquer, only to
prevent hostile peoples from killing each other for just long enough to allow
the rev settlement to kick in…
…again it is only the focus on
Jerusalem that makes this at all viable…
The very first step in
this direction, of a conscious Europe beginning on the path, must be a nuke
free Europe; The Europe led global constitutional imperatives driving the
consolidation of the new global security architecture…
RUSSIA/ FSSR
& this changed
geo cultural constitutional geo pol/econ environment (including vis the
universalist conception/ culture of the common threats/ objectives confronting
all humanity) is/ can serve as the first precondition for the
salvation of Russia forging a new FSSR.
Eg vis the pre crash model adopted
in place of post Soviet compradorism (itself only stabilized via inertia from
the burning off of the Russian fascist threat by the deliberate destruction of
the Russian army as a threat either from the right or the left as a potential
powerbase – especially of a progressive general like General Alexander Lebed) –
as result of high resource prices.
Initially
Putin wanted to use the funds from the breaking of the resource boyars/
compradors to monetise Russian welfare, to enable the development of a `normal’
Russian capitalism. But, this sunset Alexander II model was unviable as
corresponding internal migration would fatally undermine the Russian state –
China with its comparatively inexhaustible reserves of cheap labor in any case
undercuts the world market – so consequently, to insure that reliable resource
barons kept out of politics/ financed the state, was the line of least
resistance – creating an internal geo pol/econ model of `industrial tsarism’
positioned between/ dependant upon the USA (budget/ trade deficit) credit
expansionary boom maintaining the demand for Chinese goods & with such,
high resource prices…
The collapse of such (with USA
credit expansion/ Chinese over accumalation), fatally undermines the
(relatively) strong Russian national security state…
Now we
will cover Russian political economic history vis the Russian revolution in
Chapter 6 – to understand its context has to be understood in
terms of its relationship to the evolution of industrial capitalist political
economy in its entireity. & also in terms of historical
pol/econ geography covered in Chapter 7.
As I cannot include
the latter material without dragging in all of C6 –
by default, the only way I can begin to deal with
the Russia Q in this chapter (& it is necessary to first
understand what can be done now, in order to
understand the constraints preventing this previously; the better
to understand how to go about doing what can be done now), is in terms of
Russia/ FSSR as an idea, as a precursor to the
universalist conception as (prior) historical proof that ideas can
hold states together.
If the sparsity of
life in the universe seems to make interstellar contact/ mastery of the
universe by intelligent life - ultimately becoming God & inflicting the
same crap on the next cosmic generation - impossible...
...there is evidence vis our own
planets' history, that it is not just the automatic incremental
development of intelligent life via the war/ finance nexus - or even
its' historically conscious methadone substitute, the `culture of the common
threats/ objectives confronting all humanity (especially vis solar powered
desalination)', that can bind a land/ people together...
...evidence in the form of the territorial
megastate, Russia. Which vis
both the tsars (Christianity, albeit combined with fear of golden hordes) and
Russian Revolution (socialism, albeit defined almost entirely by national
security state fear of western encirclement) could only be held
together as a single state by a giant idea/ vision, wether for
good or bad...
...& which we see ever more now,
that without such a giant idea to bind it together, be inexorably
prone to seccession at the periphery & corresponding repressive action by
the center, further catalysing disintegration; the more tragic for periphery
& centre alike...
vis
descent into warlordism; catalyzing China’s intervention/ collapse into Russia/
new golden horde sweeping westwards etc
&
more, it was only possible to develop this operationally universalist approach
when…
following
on from USA/ Berezovsky aided events in
Ukraine (aimed ultimately at Russia’s disintegration) committing USA irrevocably
to all out permanent war against any impediment to its expansionist objectives
to prop up its credit expansionist system (especially vis the petrodollar)
…the
prospect of Russia’s (USA aided) disintegration put USA rapture psychology
(& war/ nuke war with Iran) centre stage – enabling the
Revolution to come up with its’ own conceptual escalation, to correspondingly
outgun it…
WHY (at the level of geo
philosophy) can Russia no longer hold itself together by
itself?
Eclipsed by the
petrodollar firstly vis the arms race. The secondly vis the crash
of the petrodollar.
The consequent threat
to all humanity means that Russia can no longer
stand alone, but that also at the level of high philosophy holding the whole
world as well as the Russian state together, Russia is no longer
alone…
...& will be conscious
of this – firstly in terms of the role of the emergent Jerusalem
centred global security architecture. The need to keep the oil/ gas on to
prevent Europe going under – which would spell death for Russia – as surely as
such a balance of power spells salvation for Russia - & allows it to `find
its level’ geo politically with restoration of the `Federation of Soviet
Socialist Republics’. But which means that in contempory setting,
in order to avoid razing its periphery in a losing self defeating attempt to
hold itself together by force, Russia must reassure its periphery
through systemic denuclearisation
What makes this flesh,
is the role of Russia in monitoring British (& then) French/ Euro nukes/
denuclearisation.
Eg Russia is acceptable
to the whole world as gaurentor/ verifier of such & yet close enough to
Europe, that if Europe has to agree to any other state as arbiter
in such (which it self evidently does); better it be the
Russians.
This psycho politically
draws Russia into the process & gives them a tangible/ viable example of
how such denuclearisation functions as an integral part of enabling
Europe to rise to its aforementioned historic tasks; that denuclearisation can
also save Russia/ restore the FSSR, prevent such from succumbing to said
catastrophic disintegration
…In this sense Europe
also serves as a geo political point of support…
Europe in committing itself to
Africa forced to correspondingly re-engineer its’ constitutional pol/econ –
serves as the geo pol/econ point of support & template for Russia/ FSSR
… Russia/ FSSR (minus the
nukes, to win the confidence of its periphery who with the collapse of the USA
empire have nowhere else to go but will all the more then be suspicious of any
national security Russian state construct; & enable FSSR to take its place
in a multi polar world) can reconstitute itself for a global/ universalist
vision – adopting similar constitutional framework enabling over time the
substantive sovereignty of the individual to develop.
This holds the FSSR
together by giving the Soviet people a constitutionally & geo politically
underpinned stake in their pol/econ…
Eg the emerging global
sovereignty of the individual (as a global economy based on solar powered
desalination – even where this is less effective in especially cold regions for
at least part of the year) & a global pol/econ constitutional framework to
underpin/ entrench (through pooled
sovereignty) their collective interests is imperative; so that they are willing
to go/ stay where otherwise they would not, save their legitimate geo pol/econ
security/ interests be properly institutionalised to gaurentee such…
To forge such a FSSR,
it requires a strong presidential figurehead working with the active support of
civil society (particularly the regions etc). Certainly not an oligarch, so by
process of elimination (the workers being so weak) this points to the army, & a figure like the
late General Alexander Lebed – who unfortunately died in a mysterious
helicopter crash.
Enabling FSSR in
conjunction with Europe & the new global security architecture to:
USA
…Chain up USA
apocalyptic expansionism (necessitating also that the USA army be reduced to guarding
its borders - including vis immigration - & be subject to aforementioned
obligations to place its nuke facilities under global control/ monitoring as
per the aforementioned global security architecture)…
…in order to free up
USA visionary expansionism (& a constitutional framework geared to the geo cultural imperatives
of such, eg) vis solar powered desalination…
…enabling USA to play a
stabilising role in terms not only of global energy security, but in helping to
orchestrate the new geo politics necessary to bring it about…
Enabling USA to express
its legitimate (heavily modified) security interests in terms pro-actively
consistent with those of the rest of humanity;
The petrodollar regime
had its roots in the Federal Reserve scam, established 93 years ago (in 1913),
in which private banking interests (which made up the cabal/ board of the private
Federal Reserve Bank) are able to print & loan fiat money to the
consequently indebted govt – which must then raise taxes to pay the accumulated
interest on said debts; to said private bankers.
This (scam) in turn
grew out of USA hyper parochial geo psychology.
Which historically was
the product of the sheer size of the USA, its not having to share geo strategic
power with other competitors like the European powers had to…
…so that the consequent
expansionist imperious isolationism, fed a suffocating insular sense of self
reliance which paradoxically left Americans cluelessly prone before the
machinations of their own military plutocrats
The key example is that
it took 85 years after the declaration of independence for the USA chessboard
to fill up to critical mass to bring the slavery issue to a head
– when the threat of northward expansion of slavery so threatened
the position of white citizens/ labor as to precipitate the final
showdown in the civil war, leading to a new racial equilibrium, which did not
so generally threaten the liberties of white citizens…
…so while class tensions could/ did play themselves out
via a rev presidential campaign as per HP Long in the context of
the Great Depression – forcing FDR to give the New Deal teeth (combined with
assassination of HP Long this cauterised the rev movement).
…a labor party was never formed in the USA, as this would
have been flooded by blacks taking it in a revolutionary direction…
So hitherto, racial divisions manifest through white
majority domination (in one way & another) were a prop to USA power elites…
…& this appeared particularly so against the backdrop
of the post war boom strengthening the hand of black radicalism, not only vis
the civil rights campaign – but more, on the one hand with Martin
Luther King’s linking of opposition to Vietnam war with increasingly radical
domestic pol/econ position and the rise of the Black Panther Party…
…& on the other side of the equation,
the role of COINTELPRO to smash the Black Panther Party –
undercover of the Vietnam War; extended by Kissinger for just
long enough to provide cover for this smashing, to effect the transition (when
USA fell of the gold standard) to a petrodollar fuelled credit
expansionary political economic order…
…enabling the rise
of a new white middle class – as the black working class & sections
of white working class trashed – as a prop to the reconfigured regime…
However, as we have seen (in `Rebellion of the Damned’),
this is both unsustainable over the long run (vis
institutionalised hyper-inflation – even though shared with rest of the world)
& inexorably fuels the plutocratic feeding frenzy (appetite increasing with
eating) raising the process to a fever pitch.
This has led to a remarkable sclerosis.
Property/ asset speculation of astronomical levels
appearing to fuel demand (vis credit expansion/ borrowing against
said assets), that actually serves to drain real demand and
increase the costs of production in USA. An offshoring (eg to China/ Mexico) to
places (not yet) cursed with the same level of `economic dark matter’ draining
the real economy – as well as dirt cheap wages. & an overt encouragement
of illegal migration not just to drive wages of USA labor
down but for the most fascinating reason of all.
Because it is now no longer simply the case that USA
blacks are the means by which white USA labor is kept divided/ in check, in a comparatively
privileged position.
Rather white Americans, stripped of their
privileges, indebted, their country over –run, their jobs/ assets offshored are
now seen as the chief strategic threat/enemy by the USA military
plutocratic elite.
(neither the cabbage headed inanities of the orthodox
left that cannot grasp this dialectical dynamic, nor those of the white rapture
freaks, in any way altering this objective reality).
…as it is feared that given such good reasons, they will
turn against their masters…
The conclusion is obvious.
The USA (& global) chessboard has filled up once
again (since the civil war). Wider reality has broken through the
hyper parochial insularity of especially white USA. & if they
wish to save their country, they will have to cut a deal with the rest of
humanity, as the rest of humanity must cut a deal with them. This of course
means cutting the military plutocratic elite out as hegemonic power.
We will need the appropriate gaurentees, as the USA will
need its legitimate interest taken care of…
In many respects this process must be fundamentally
defined by the ending of the civil wars with African Americans – though in a
way different from that expected by established/ conventional political
factors…
If white USA defined by an insular suffocating (children
of the corn) hyperparochialism, Black USA (setting aside its impact on the core
political economy – compelling it to reconfigure itself accordingly) is defined
by an existential disconnect…
This is a process far more complex & fundamental than
simply being (ancestrally) deracinated from Africa & transplanted as slaves
to USA (with severing of cultural roots/ identities & a range of
remodifications of this process since slavery).
The contempory core of this existential disconnect is not
merely the lack of a strong Africa, but of an Africa perpetually in flames;
starving Africa, underdeveloped Africa, war ravaged Africa.
& a corresponding lack of self respect/ confidence –
the emphasis on a prizing of toughness as a defense/ source of pride – tipping
over inexorably into a plundering/ rapine mindset when strength cannot be
combined with reason & reason alone (before the children of the corn) is
impotent – the thing is to at all costs, not appear weak – vis gangsta rap (apparently
similar tendancies vis Latinos MS13, the Mexican ZETA aided drugs gangs etc owe
more to the relentless wave after wave of illegals entering USA encouraged
by USA elite – divide et imperia).
The truth is, it took the crash of the petrodollar, the
culmination point of 4 billion years of earth evolution on the basis of the
hegemony of matter over consciousness, before humanity would even
be ready for the truth about Africa & (with it) its own
destiny.
For as long as a fraction of humanity could
prosper by war/ finance nexus, petrodollar propelled plunder and/ or looking
the other way, then such simply called the shoots…
…rendering humanity
blind to the fact that that even more than direct colonialism/
corruption it was the sheer scale of Planet Africa, its impenetrable
vastness that previously overwhelmed / defied humanity’s attempts to
master the territory – so that it was only via the colonial levers of the war/
finance nexus that Africa could be opened up at all, in however warped a
fashion.
Eg any attempt to replicate the conventional model of
development must fail – even any significant wealth generation
develops such internal migration across wide & porous borders (increasingly
a problem for the west – ironically prior to its geo pol/econ crash) as to
overwhelm same…
…unless development based much more on the
freestanding social econ unit (info, energy & water) so that there is both
not principally any boomtown locale to flood into, AND people
know they will be made use of/ be able to develop.
(So that the balance of power will come to
lie not in New York, London or even Jerusalem. But in the hands of the
sovereign individual).
Africa then, is the proving ground for the whole world.
To develop both the transcendent
practicalities/ technologies eg common ownership of info, solar powered
microgeneration & solar powered desalination/ purification AND
critically the psycho political mindsetrequired to developing/ consolidating
them via the gyrostabilising universalist conception – the written secular
constitution designed to secure for everyone control of their time to
comprehend the unwritten universal constitution, to draw on the
supra reserve of courage to gain mastery of god’s creation in order to
avoid being destroyed by our own creation…
…for it is in the enormous struggle to accomplish such,
that our collective space centric destiny/ salvation lies; so much vaster than
any thirst for vengeance between classes or any of earth’s races or tribes.
As regards those that argue that there be significant genetic/ neurological differences between the races.
I do not consider myself (being an ultra generalist) qualified to say – though I would not be surprised.
But what I will state is this. If such are arguing for the supremacy of the comparmentalised mindset/ thinking that threatens the world with the aforementioned depleted uranium based DNA decomposition over say a more primordial impulsive (though no less intelligent) mindset, then I am not impressed…
…for if it be argued that the catastrophic aspects of the former can be overcome, then so can the catastrophic aspects of the latter.
Furthermore, I am convinced that evey part of humanity is holding an indispensable piece of the picture (this chapter actually illustrates this at the strategic level).
& that his also goes for the Aussie Aboriginals…
& that
just as eco diversity is vital to survival, so is the utilisation of at least
apects of the thought processes & perspectives growing out of the very soil
thrown up by the various geo cultures (& all to easily squished by the
depleted uranium mindset) – a number of which we will examine in Chapter 6.
The existential disconnect, that reconnects are those that USA rednecks are getting to grips with on the petrodollar & 9/11 in particular vis the assault on the official narratives.
To the extent that big pharma USA was (is at time of writing, though petrodollar likely to crash beforehand) about to launch a massive propaganda campaign to pave the way for mass screening/ mass medication for so called mental health disorders (`unusual beliefs’ – such as those outlined in Alex Jones or my work – considered an indicator of mental illness. A phrase which ropes in peope questioning the viability of the petrodollar regime or official 9/11 narrative with those claiming to have been abducted by aliens) just before the $ crash.
This while the (financial) masters of the universe were openly lamenting their own failure to comprehend (at the level of economic theory) the econ crash they could see developing before their eyes (with a $370Trillion derivatives pyramid) – even as their nat sec state henchmen (in alliance with big pharma) were seeking to chemically bludgeon en masse, those in the (then) underground that did.
(so that either you lobotomised yourself or they would do it for you).
As regards the mainstream media, concern for jobs/ mortgages was sufficient to prevent the, even mentioning the petrodollar based character of the credit expansionary pyramid, right up to the crash itself.
Eg aside from containing those with Lebanonised minds, the socio organic purpose of the mental `health’ system is literally to serve as a dungeon that nobody in their right mind would want anything to do with.
This is to prevent an ever increasingly larger number of people availing themselves of facilities/ services which would constitute a catastrophic drain on expenditure.
Actually (as one who stole time from everyone else/ bummed the dole for so long because I saw the storm & sought to prepare the antidote) this is at one level, understandable/ even reasonable, even as it is inherently depraved.
But, at the time of writing 3/12/06, such sanctions as are initiated by plundering military plutocrats, are leading to an extension of privatised prison labor, plans of mass medication of dissidents & concentration camps in USA owned by Kellog, Brown & Root as well as Haliburton etc.
To re-iterate, the pivotal macro & microscopic issue (upon which 4 billion years earth evolution hinges) is that of control of time…
A written secular constitutional conception (mandated by the Battle of Jerusalem) defined by seeking for all humanity increasing control over its own time to comprehend the unwritten universal (cosmological) constitution, can develop the overarching sense of gyrostabilising common purpose that simultaneously assures people that they will not be crushed by war/ finance machine and because of this; legitimate sanctions against those not doing their bit…
…very messily & falteringly, over an extended timeline, resolving the paradox ridden existential disconnects that divide man from man, tribe from tribe & humanity from itself.
THIS way we are, in a legitimated & sustainable fashion, able to save my university, the DSS/ Welfare state, that allowed/ enabled me to do my work, whilst extending it to all humanity – enabling it to meet the aforementioned challenges of its destiny.
Now, the opinion of the
overwhelming global majority will likely be, its all their fault,
so let them stew…
However, bearing in
mind the fact that we must see the above in the context of
intelligent life with the capacity to become God emerging from pondscum over 4
billion years of earth evolution; & being enslaved by the first great
machine it ever created, the 10,000 year old war/ finance nexus, & that (as
we have seen so far & shall continue to see) the only way we
can avoid being destroyed by our own creation, is to draw on the supra reserve
of courage to seek mastery of God’s creation, in order, as the
precondition for gaining mastery of ourselves/ our own creation…
…our first objective
must be to to triage the situation. To stop things getting irretrievably worse
& to save what must be saved if we are to even begin to
progress out of the darkness…
As we have seen so far,
& shall continue to see, this means accepting remedies that would otherwise
be wholly unacceptable in part to every grouping/ people, save
for the fact (as Kissinger says) the absence of alternatives had (not)
clarified our minds wonderfully.
Eg:
the key to USA security
(to enable tight immigration policy) is for USA to make itself
indispensable to the 3rd world…
…especially Latin
America (to win allies in such)…
Curiously it is
precisely the radical forces that have emerged/ strengthened in Latin America
(post cold war)
…That represent USA’s
best lever of survival…
…as USA’s crash
partially deprives them of a galvinising enemy, exposes the
weakness of parochial egalitarianism (eg lacking a wider gyrostabilising
visionary objective)
& this leaves them doubly
exposed before their own desperate peoples – that may accept that
yes, USA was largely to blame for this mess, but what are they
going to do to get them out of it???
As it is clear that no
force has the power to both vanquish their (erstwhile) adversary AND
hold the center, by process of elimination, the only remaining option (except
MAD) is a practical alliance – to prop each other up – based on USA making themselves
indispensable establishing common ownership of info in exchange for the oil
remaining on long enough to effect the transition to solar powered
microgeneration…
…& Latin American
revolutionaries doing their utmost to provide a geo pol point of support/
stability by not encouraging mass immigration into USA OR
(especially) seccession – in fact doing all in their power to
restrain such; as such would be to undermine a decisive aid to their
progress (& would also lead to the spread of 750,000 tons of depleted
uranium from USA nuclear installations destroying all human/ animal DNA in the
Americas & beyond)…
Q WHY on earth given the dubious aspect of the original USA annexation of Texas/ California…
…described by General Ulysses S Grant as the most unjust war in USA history…
…are we so utterly determined on opposing the range of forces that threaten re-acquisition of said territories – eg illegal migration leading to AZTLAN etc???
The key issue is to oppose/ check any & all expansionist forces that threaten to gather their own catastrophic momentum.
Therefore Israeli settler expansionism must be checked. & yet as we have seen it is not so simple, for the danger is that Israel be driven into the sea (alerting Israeli missile command) – which is not only bad news for Israel, but as means no Jewish admin of Mecca to finally stabilise 1300 year conflict between Sunni & Shia means oblivion for the territory of Medina superstate, spelling death to humanity per se.
Which is why we need an entire global security architecture to be developed through the prism of Israel/ Palestine to in turn also stabilise the latter…
& because Israel/ Palestine (Jerusalem in particular) has the focus of the whole world, this is possible to do…
But if the AZTLAN logic is not checked at every level, it will/ can only feed of itself, be ever bolder/ ever more expansionist (without limit) in its aims/ pathologies…
This means the loss of the info. This means the collapse of civilisation. This means the collapse of industrial agriculture, this means the only food available will be that appealing to the Aztecs…
& the most effective check on USA apocalyptic expansion paradoxically, is for USA civil society to get the USA more focused on the defense of its own borders…
…rather than having USA nuclear plutocratic eliete trying to blackmail the whole world into accepting its fiat currency at the point of a nuclear sixshooter.
THIS
way, if USA wishes to preserve its territorial/ structural integrity, it must not
only establish common ownership of info in exchange for the oil
remaining on long enough to effect transition to solar powered microgeneration;
it must also accept that its nuclear installations be subject to
monitoring by the new global security architecture – preventing a nuclear
exchange between USA & Mexico/ AZTLAN, having over-run some of the nukes.
Wheras European fragmentation of power helps reconcile
it to its role (the need to re-orientate itself towards Africa – as the
space centric Universalist Conception made flesh – to avoid European
fratricide), in essence Latin America functions as a geo proximite check
on USA hyper parochial insanity to prevent USA apocalyptic
expansionism gathering its own dynamic; and acts as mediator with
the the peoples of the mideast/ 3rd world that would otherwise be
inclined to a revanchist logic – to keep the oil turned on, to preserve the
info (on pain of mutual oblivion) – at both levels tying USA into
this process, saving the USA, saving L. America & the world.
Eg in certain respects but not all,
Latin America’s role with the USA parallels the role of Russia in monitoring
European (esp British/ French) nuke disarmament).
Eg it keeps a check on USA
apocalyptic expansionist delusions (as Russia checks the nuclear nation state
delusions of Europe); but because of intense/ explosive border tension cannot
be the DIRECT check on USA nukes…
…Eg Hugo Chavez will doubtless want
to monitor USA nukes (personally, with handpicked Venezuelan forces), but, as
this is manifestly unacceptable & unacceptable
that they go unmonitored, this points to South Asian (re-unified,
& re-inforced by the Medina Commonwealth) troops monitoring USA nuke
installations, to gaurentee the investment of those exchanging oil for the establishment
of the common ownership of info (to buy time to allow for the transition to
solar powered microgeneration), that their & humanity’s (4 billion years of
earth evolutionary) investment will be gaurenteed over the longrun.
A factor geo strategically manifest
at the global level; by USA’s active acceptance of the process of
establishing global security architecture/ constitutional framework - &
Latin American radicals using their weight to sell such to peoples of the
mideast/ 3rd world that would otherwise by inclined to a revanchist
logic – buying time for humanity to allow the antidote to kick in…
Hence it is only via the universalist conception…
The written secular
constitution – the guiding objective of which be to secure for humanity mastery
over its’ own time to comprehend the unwritten universal
constitution (eg equality as means to such an end not as a mere
end in itself)
…That the
USA/ Latinos can be ideologically, politically, economically
& geo strategically reconciled…
As the role of the
(post petrodollar crash) stripped down USA army is to put steel in the backbone
of USA civil society/ militias to resist threats to the legitimate security
interests within without…
(only this way can the USA
army in any form even hold together at all; otherwise it collapses altogether)
…the pivotal Q further
reduces itself to WHAT is it that SIMALTANEUOSLY
holds the USA army together AND compels USA conservative anti neo
con resistance elements, currently (as at 16/8/06) possessed of an isolationist
mindset to take a further imaginative leap and consent to participating in a
common global security architecture???
To keep the
USA’s own nukes stable.
Aside from the fact
that living with the nukes under such circumstances of collapse/ psychic shock
will be like living, eating, drinking, sleeping with the badly decomposing
corpses of your parents.
…the logic of USA/
Mexico border tension/ breakdown means that to avoid proximite threat (eg
Latino demands especially from Chavez that USA nuclear installations be placed
under their jurisdiction) USA MUST accept South Asian monitoring of USA nuclear
installations…
…to chain up USA
apocalyptic expansionism, to free up USA visionary expansionism…
…enabling USA to play a
stabilizing role in terms not only of global energy security (vis development
of solar powered microgeneration), but in helping to orchestrate the new geo
politics necessary to bring this about …
…enabling USA to
express its legitimate (heavily modified) security interests in terms
proacvtively consistent with those of the rest of humanity.
USA reservations/ implacable opposition to even discussing the very concept of a single global security architecture, will give way to a proper discussion about how checks/ balances & how the frameworks are to be so constructed vis security etc/ geo pol/econ priorities etc (eg substantive sovereignty of the individual).
…& shall more & more define USA
constitutional framework accordingly.
Eg the social revolution
in security seeks consolidation via common ownership of info and
solar powered microgeneration ( almost by default – vis the chaining up of USA
apocalyptic expansionism) to secure control over currency to
insure no more magnate control especially via fiat currencies especially via
the power of energy barons. & USA seeks its security (for USA) through
global extension/ consolidation of said transcendent practicalities – the
Universalist Conception made flesh.
Thus, USA
hyperparochialism becomes its redemptive antithesis.
Q HOW is this possible?
Because (as
noted) post petrodollar crash, the USA/ global chessboard has filled up (for
the first time since the USA Civil War), & very survival in the USA locale,
demands such global constitutional engagement.
Q vis the spectre of massively
resurgent anti Semitism, post petrodollar crash, when Jesus is a no show,
especially in the USA far more powerful than the 1930’s…
…HOW do we deal with
such, directly or obliquely???
The USA needs to cut a deal with the
rest of humanity, based on the common ownership of info for oil for solar
powered microgeneration trade of…
…anything that gets in
the way of this (vis exploding hyperparochialism), gets in the way of viable
USA interests…
…post crash, with nuke
war against Iran, it will be perfectly impossible (& indeed undesirable) to
attempt to preserve the culture of `exceptionality’ surrounding the holocaust,
as the general illegitimacy of the (crashed) petrodollar regime legitimates
the airing of illegitimate views at least to the extent of them having to be
given a fair hearing…
& while I myself don’t sympathise
with the idea of a global Jewish conspiracy, it is actually NOT
for me…
Aside from my role at the Battle
of Jerusalem, my role is principally that of helping to establish the most
basic historical philosophical programmatic constitutional narrative, necessary
to give humanity the most rudimentary starting point possible to begin to get
on top of the chaos. Therefore I should produce as much as is necessary to
fulfil this objective, but presume to no more than this.
What in particular I should not do, is adopt the approach of a criminal investigator (which rather more suits Alex Jones), immersed in the details. For if say, I got involved in the 9/11 Truth Movement in a big way, rather than simply stating 9/11 was the self evident product of the petrodollar alliance, this would be to conflate the constitutional narrative with the investigative, to the detriment of both, by undermining the incipient constitutional principle of seperation of powers.
…to attempt to prevent others expressing such opinions.
But what I will state is this.
Any attempt to use such, as a substitute for complying with the program for establishing the substantive sovereignty of the individual which enables such to eclipse all elite cabals, constitutes an act of war against all humanity & must be countered using all such sanctions as are available & required…
& I will further add that such currents have an innate tendancy to cabalism of their own – as evinced in the Nazi pagan cults.
`Give me control of a nations’ currency & I care not who writes its laws’ – Meyer Rothschild
Therefore gain control of your currency.
HOW???
Common Ownership of info combined with solar powered microgeneration will enable you to pool a substantive sovereignty of the individual, impregnable by any cabals, giving you control of your currency.
SO DO IT…
Q How far & in what way
must the mechanisms of global jurisidiction extend over USA vis warcrimes etc?
Well, to begin with as
noted, in exchange for the oil remaining on long enough to effect the
transition to solar powered microgeneration, the common ownership of info must
be established…
Britain must engage in
a limited number of executions to burn bridges with any delusion that the old
order is at all viable to enable it to play role outlined in Chapter 2 vis
Battle of Jerusalem…
…but it must not
engage in any blood purge beyond this or else it generates
historically fatal panic/ descent into chaos/ global chaos…
Furthermore, this
process does not fall within the ambit of an international
tribunal like the Hague/ Nuremberg type trials for fairly obvious reasons.
Eg such as are established
are suspect because of their associations with the old hegemonic powers anyway.
Alternately, establishing a 3rd world court, risks a situation
whereby, to maintain control of the agenda at home, narrowly focused 3rd
world political elites will be forever calling for more & more executions
to establish our bona fides, which leads to mutual chaos/ collapse.
Our only
defense by due process of historical elimination/ default therefore, is to
carry out minimum number of executions necessary to burn bridges with any
delusion that we can restore the old agendas, to actually raise the price
of human blood. Eg as to fail to do so will lead to brigandage/
collapse/ total slaughter. AND release info on national security
state – so that any such elites pointing to our record, is more confronted by
its own people wanting similar openness than deriving any further power/
mileage from such…
The USA will be faced
with a related though not identical set of circumstances.
If the USA does not
as part of the process of its constitutional re-engineering, make available
the full horror of its national
security state machinations, it will so undermine trust from the 3rd
world as to precipitate collapse.
Conversely, to release
such info/ establish common ownership of info, helps spread the English
language; preserving the virile/ viable part of USA power that can/ must
be preserved/ developed.
& while USA troops
will have their hands full on the USA/ Mexico border (as well as preventing
nukes going astray in the pre Battle of Jerusalem interregnum) & given
their immediate history would not really enhance security in the mideast; for
the sake of the USA people, to acknowledge to themselves the necessity of
burning bridges with the old agendas, a trial paralleling that in Britain,
& functioning as an aid to constitutional re-engineering with a limited
number of executions is necessary, to actually raise the price of
blood…
Eg there will NOT
exist, not only at the time of writing (18/8/06), but at the time of action, NO
global authority/ constitutional framework in whom anyone can have any
confidence.
This whole process is
about beginning the process of developing such by first
establishing a global security architecture…
Therefore the processes
that lay the groundwork for this are by definition confederal in
character.
Eg it is ONLY
with the emergent hegemony of the universalist conception enabled by the substantive
sovereignty of the individual enabled by common ownership of info/ solar
powered microgeneration that we consolidate the post military plutocratic
order…
The `One World Standing Army as the
primary force of enslavement’ of USA conservative anti neo con nightmares, as
we have illustrated so far & shall illustrate further, is totally incapable
of consolidating a viable geo pol/econ center of gravity…
But to do this/ keep on
track, we need (as well as a common global focus vis) a common global security
architecture. & this means moving the global capital to Jerusalem.
Which in turn entails the global capital to be moved to Jerusalem – which correspondingly must also be capital of the Medina Commonwealth…
MEDINA
The region of the
Medina Commonwealth (stabilised in the run up to the Battle of Jerusalem by
being the focus of the whole world in emerging global security architecture)
has little experience of parliamentary/ civil society operation so the
transition is not quite so obvious…
But, as well as the
fact that it self evidently requires Jewish administration of Mecca to prevent
Sunni/ Shia razing it with fratricidal strife, it therefore also needs to
stabilise the vortices of Mecca/ Medina via aforementioned constitutional
vision based on Universalist Conception – humanity gaining mastery over its own
time (to enable humanity to acquire the knowledge to deal with the common
threats/ objectives confronting it – beginning with solar powered
desalination…), to gain control of universal time/ universe etc (become God our
cosmic parents & visit the same crap on the next cosmic generation)…
…Specifically
in order to enable the division between a secular written global (as well
as Medina Commonwealth superstate) constitution & the unwritten universal/
cosmic constitution that the former is designed to help humanity (acquire the
time to) understand…
Thus
restoring/ refining the golden core of ancient secular Islamic culture, that to
pursue knowledge for causes/ objectives greater than oneself is the measure of
oneself, others & all humanity…
…The Palestinians are geo
politically best placed to lead the development of Medina Commonwealth
focussing it on the world, most obvious figurehead being Marwan Barghoutti…
Medina (from Jerusalem)
therefore holds & gyrostabilises the focus of the whole world & is in
turn held stable by it…
& what denuclearises/ keeps Medina Commonwealth denuclearised, is that possession of nukes would generate such apocalyptic internal fratricidal suspiscion/ conflict as to blow the Medina Commonwealth to smithereens – to the self evident ruination of all peoples
This rather throws out the Q WHY could
this not have been done before?
But this is also self evident at a number
of levels.
When the world geo pol/econ was based on the USA led petrodollar
imperium, the attention of the world could not be on holding/
uniting Medina together as a bloc – rather it was on maintaining its
fragmentation/ even fragmenting it further…
Therefore
without the imperatives for & the geo pol/econ
strategic re-inforcement (as outlined in chapter 2); there was no
geo strategic settlement framework possible to gaurentee Israel’s
security…
Eg
Israel for historical reasons found itself riding a tiger. Jewish nationalism
(Zionism) was itself the product of European 19th centuary
nationalism; & the rising sense of a need for security/ self respect that
sovereign control of a particular scrap of land brought with it…
initially a minority trend in European Jewish geo political culture (though with a destabilising impact on the Post Ottoman British Mandated Palestinian locale earlier) it became critical in the aftermath of the Holocaust – the failure of the European left to offer an alternative framework of security (which fundamental basis of, we examine in chapter 6)
…Unfortunately,
the land in Q belonged to others…
From this, we ended up
(amidst the conflicting regional/ global parochialisms) with a situation in
which because of this, Israel, Israel itself felt
itself to be a fundamentally illegitimate state – that could only
be viewed as an armoured cuckoo in the regional nest.
Therefore
for example, if the Palestinians/ wider Arab world had then
accepted in 1967, UN Resolution 242, this would have (at the time) sanctioned past
land theft, & therefore held out the irresistible prospect
that future land theft would be similarly validated later on down
the line, ad infinitum.
Ironically
therefore, it is only because a return to 1967 borders now represents
the quintessential purging of hubrisitic imperial settler ambition, that such can
& must be a viable component of a final settlement…
The refrain from many pro settler elements is `we will give back the West bank/ East Jerusalem, when USA gives back Texas/ California…’
Aside from the fact that the USA military plutocratic elite has been `giving back’ Texas/ California as part of its divide et imperia policy towards an embattled white working/ middle class whose previous privileged position has been so undermined as to make them the most dangerous enemy of said elite, such can be seen as particularly undesirable as this gives said elite a free hand to engage in global nuclear blackmail to attempt to prop up the petrodollar.
Therefore to check the rise of an expansionist AZTLAN project (for which, appetite would increase with eating – never mind the loss of the info spelling oblivion in itself) and that of USA military plutocratic elite; re-inforcement of USA territorial integrity is essential.
Wheras
Israeli settlerdom, as we have seen, must be cauterised to
prevent Israel triumphing itself (& everyone else) into oblivion – with
of course the appropriate
aforementioned geo strategic checks to
prevent Palestinian/ Arab hubris gathering its own dynamic – which is why we
need to and indeed can
engineer the new (post petrodollar) global security architecture through the
prism of this conflict…
…That
this can (in the contempory geo pol/econ setting) serve as a vital
component in dealing with the mideastern/ Islamic world’s historic problem:
The
need for a (division between the) written secular constitution as
the means by which humanity secures mastery of its own time; to comprehend the
unwritten universal/ cosmological constitution (become God/ our cosmic parents
& visit the same crap on the next cosmic generation).
Eg
this conscious universalist imperative is essential to enable focus to remain on
establishing the susbstantive sovereignty of the individual (via common
ownership of info stabilised by solar power microgeneration) to consolidate
this objective…
&
as outlined in Chapter 2; stabilisation of geo cultural vortex Mecca, by
Israeli ( to prevent war between Sunni/ Shia, destroying Mecca & with it
Medina & the whole world) is necessary to stabilise Medina & with it he
whole world…
Many
will ask, how can this be? That our collective constitutional
destiny is dependent on such bastardised origins?
But
it is all of a piece. Human consciousness emerged from the
primordial sludge yet has the capacity to become God. It had no choice but to
trudge through the savagery of its primordial evolution/ evolution of the war/
finance nexus to this point where ¾ scared to death, it can &must embrace
the last best, indeed only chance it will ever get to seize command of its
destiny.
As Christians/
Muslims/ Jews/ Deists (yours truly) whatever, it is a salutary reminder that
whatever horrors man has done to man, no horror inflicted by one to another
even begins to compare with the horror of what was done to us all by our own
creator…
Setting
in motion a universal dynamic where intelligent life as an independent entity
slithered out of the primordial sludge, was enslaved by the first great machine
it ever created the war/ finance nexus, so that it is only on the edge of
oblivion, threatened with oblivion by our own creation that we can seize our
destiny by drawing on the supra reserve of courage to gain mastery of our own
creation by seeking to gain mastery of God’s creation, become god/ our cosmic
parents & visit the same crap on the next cosmic generation.
…&
in this sordid transcendence, lies the very hope of humanity per
se…
Q But what
keeps Medina stable in the interim?
The fact that the Sunni/ Shia partisans will have
partially burned themselves out fighting each other…
…leading to their partial delegitimisation…
As Mecca is the great geo cultural vortex, it cannot
be stabilised by a nation state, & so needs either a
great empire to stabilise it or (as we have seen) a superstate with division
between written secular constitution & unwritten universal
constitution – the former designed to give humanity control over its time to
comprehend the latter gain mastery over God’s time/ creation to avoid being
destroyed by our own creation….
OR the diabolical trinity that has
been reigning since the end of the Ottoman empire with increasing intensity…
…An alliance of Saudi royals, with hardline Wahhabis –
which in context of the petrodollar requires not only an alliance with USA
petrodollar hegemony in exchange for `protection’, but also the paying of
Danegeld to Islamic fascists to make trouble elsewhere & maintain control
over the Mecca brand – prevent convergence on Mecca by leftists
or fascists…
Eg the geo cultural heart of this problem is that unlike
with Christianity, whose spiritual home is really Jerusalem - & contested
by 3 supranational (religious) identities – which means as it is at such a remove
from same, the writ of Rome (& less still Canterbury) is not as spiritually
unchallengeable as it would be if based in Jerusalem; because
the Muslim world’s heart is not contested by other supranational
(religious) identities, in a nuclear/ global hyperinflationary age in which
control of Mecca cannot just pass from one military empire (such
as the Ottomans) to another…
…but instead the combustible forces that have built up in
the modern era (when the modern ideologies had failed &) express themselves
in a millenialist attempt to lay hands on this primordial geo psycho political
focus, to shape the destiny of the region/ world.
This will inevitably lead with destruction of the Dome of
the Rock, to convergence on & war between Sunni & Shia to control
Mecca.
Which paradoxically reduces the region to a greater degree
of infantilism, whilst at the same time, rendering everyone so
sick of the self evidently self destructive failed millenialist Jihadi mindset,
that the emergence/ engagement of a Palestinian Capital Territry (vis the
capital territory of the future Medina superstate) becomes the
transitional lodestar…
…consolidation demands a series of shifts
away from millenialist Jihadism as the sword shatters into communal fragments.
& towards the idea of a division
between the written secular constitution & unwritten
universal cosmological constitution…
Which must attain consolidation after last of the 1967
territories handed back, & then after Pakistan destroys its nukes, Israel
can give up its nukes, so that Jewish admin of Mecca becomes a/
the viable option to end/ plug the 1300 year conflict between Sunni/ Shia
(analogous to the way Muslims admin the Christian Sepulchre in Jerusalem –
preventing general war between the Christian denominations) – consolidating
Medina superstate by so consolidating the constitution…
…as East Jerusalem consolidates the positive
assertion of a secular written constitutional vision – to secure
for Medina/ all humanity, control over its time to comprehend the
unwritten universal (cosmological) constitution – to draw on the
supra reserve of courage to gain mastery of God’s creation in order to avoid
being destroyed by our own creation…
Eg a strong secular Medina Commonwealth/ superstate will
have the corresponding effect of enabling the rest of the Muslim
world to fixate far less on religious hyperconflict…
Indo-Pak
What paradoxically
partially stabilizes Pakistan in the interim, is the very fact that it can
barely be stabilized – needs a certain cover/ protection from the
incipient oil superstate (Medina Commonwealth)
Pakistan, cursed by geo politics,
trapped by India, & its corresponding cold war relationship with/
dependency on USA, & Afghanistan to its northwest; has been hit
particularly hard by the unholy trinity of Saudi royals in alliance with
USApetrodollar imperium & the aforementioned Jihadis bought off with Saudi
danegeld.
Firstly in terms of USA support for
Islamic fascism in cold war as bulwark against socialism. Secondly in terms of
USA/ Zbigniew Brzezinski using Pakistan as jumping off point to encourage (via
CIA) Jihadi assault on the radical Afghan govt to terrify USSR with prospect of
its Central Asian missile bases being over-run by Jihadi fascists – so that
they would invade & be bled by USA & Saudi backed Jihadi forces.
& Pakistan whose secular public school system was
trashed under orders of the USA controlled IMF & replaced with
proliferation of Saudi financed Islamist madrassas, become flooded with
Jihadis, their state security structures permeated with such & the flood of
opium/ heroin which financed the war effort/ Jihadi warlords generally,
fuelling instability in a territory barely governable anyway…
..the consequences of which in terms
of lost hubristic wars, are laid at the feet of Pakistan - by senile imperialists
with 10,000 nukes - looking for someone else to blame.
This is likely to be manifest over
the Sept 11th issue…
The current official narrative (15/12/06) being that 19 troglodytes brought
down 3 steel framed buildings with 2 planes, is likely to undergo a review post
petrodollar crash.
Hitherto the CIA claims to have had
no agents in Pakistan at the time of Sept 11th 2001 (that it was
hand in glove with the ISI at the time of the Afghan wars but pulled out its
agents as soon as Pakistan became a nuclear power). Eg ISI was linked to
Taliban which was linked to Al Qaeda & to have acknowledged
the presence of CIA agents would have raised Qs about connexions between CIA
& their old asset Osama Bin Laden (Leila Helms daughter of ex CIA chief
Richard helms was the Taliban PR Rep in USA 3 weeks prior to Sept 11th
2001).
THIS means Pakistan
(along with Israel) is under grave threat of becoming a lightening conductor
for those in the USA that have lost everything & are looking for someone
else to blame, that do not want to pay too much attention to the leading
role of USA in the petrodollar alliance (& how such used
Pakistan, as outlined, for its own nefarious ends)…
& while (as outlined in
`Rebellion of the Damned’) the truth is that Sept 11th 2001 was under
any & all possible circumstances the product of the petrodollar
alliance (even if the official narrative as at 15/12/06 is true, or
if the USA petrodollar regime simply allowed such to happen so
that it could wage wars that would keep the oil sold in $$$ to prop up USA fiat
currency or if USA regime actually carried out the attacks
themselves with Al Qaeda as a backing group/ narrative)…
…the only way this
truth can decisively shield Pakistan, is if Pakistan plays &
is seen to play, its critical role in moving the global political economy
towards forging the global security architecture necessary to underpin the
aforementioned common ownership of info for oil for solar powered
microgeneration trade off – enabling humanity to pool its substantive sovereignty
to effect control over its pol/econ – especially over its currency by breaking
the stranglehold of the financial sharpies, their secureaucratic adjuncts, by
eclipsing the power of the energy barons…
A process which be consolidated by
the corresponding written secular constitution – designed to
secure for humanity control over its time to comprehend the unwritten
universal (cosmological) constitution, to gain mastery over itself by gaining
mastery over God’s time/ creation – to avoid being destroyed by its own
creation.
Firstly (vis the oil Q/
agenda – as outlined in Chapter 1), in terms of keeping the USA nukes off
Pakistan…
…indeed the very fact
that Pakistan has been given this extended lifespan, pulls it into the rev geo pol/ strategic orbit
(encourages development of nuclear shotgun wedding);
…which partially cuts
the ground from underneath Hindu fascism; barely sufficiently, to buy enough
time & space within Indian civil society’s mind, for the incipient global
security architecture agenda (as outlined in Chapter 1)/ global
constitutional agenda/ universalist conception to sufficiently begin to take
root…
analogous to similar tendancies/
processes vis Sunnia/ Shia conflict in Medina – whereby chaos is sufficiently delegitimised
to lengthen the fuse to allow us to make it to each staging post (just) pre
consolidation
Which in turn scorches
any illusions that Pakistan can any longer stand on its own (an agonizing
interim self conscious parochialism) – geo psychologically preparing Pakistan
for re-unification with India…
…Eg Medina Commonwealth becoming
more clearly defined in terms of its superstate identity – rather than (as at
time of writing 18/2/06) as the vortice for 1.5 billion Muslims – is an added
factor in Pakistan, recognizing by due process of historical elimination, its
only viable long term security/ developmental option
So that aided by said
geostrategic cover from Medina & Pakistan’s presidency of the Global
Commonwealth Confederation as it gives up its nukes as outlined in
Chapter 1 vis global security architecture
…with Hindu fascism
partially marginalized, Pakistan can push for the consolidation of such vis
rebuilding of Ayodhya mosque/ other geo strategic gaurentees…
…& the vision of unified South
Asia, geo culturally stabilised by its role (vis global security
architecture, outlined in Chapter 1) as leading check on USA
apocalyptic expansionism (enabling USA global visionary expansionism), it is in
many respects similar to Europe in its otherwise self evident propensity
to fragmentation without such a vision…
The Q that drives
development of a similar constitutional framework in South Asia, in a way
similar to that in Europe (to protect its troops in Africa) is the choice,
either:
Be the leading check on USA (& China), as the emergent transitional
power bloc eventually eclipsing Europe (before Africa takes charge); &
develop solar powered desalination energy generation that saves instead of
killing of the River Ganges. Or:
Succumb to fratricidal strife/ disintegration/ annihilation…
The critical thing here
is, that like with the FSSR, it is now changed geo pol (constitutional) context
led by Europe (as well as the new global security architecture), that makes it
possible for aforesaid component constitutional factors impelling such in
India; to play into/ orientate itself towards (aforementioned) global
constitutional dynamic.
When do the Indians get rid of their nukes???
What compels such???
Pakistan nuke disarmament marginalizing
Indian nat sec state in power
Indian monitoring of USA
nukes
Eg therefore as India begins/ grows into its role it
finds its nukes get in the way of internal domestic stability, hampering its
global role – compelling Indian nuke disarmament to stabilise internally/
enabling India to perform its global role…
…& if India does NOT adequately contain USA nukes,
then the oil is turned of by Medina – as well as of course, India losing its
own visionary geo cultural focus(USA visionary expansionism entirely contingent
upon the chaining up of demented USA apocalyptic imperial expansionism) upon
which is contingent the salvation of the Ganges.
This explains (partially) external factors
that define Indian post petrodollar geo pol/econ historic options – but does
not yet define what can/ must hold the Indian centre of gravity internally
post petrodollar crash – which we shall now examine.
To explain Indian geo political economy preceeding the
British empire…
(which is critical to understanding both how the British
able to establish their empire in India & how the concept of a united
British India gave rise to the Indian National Idea),
…it is necessary to compare it with the European supra
national geo political economy since the Roman empire –
Which to set the terms of reference (the defining Qs) for
such, entails firstly examining capitalist longwave cycles from the 1840’s to
the present period (in more depth than has be done in Rebellion of the Damned)…
…important as these subjects are (& which we shall
cover in the next 2 chapters) for corroborative purposes (to prove or disprove
the viability of the gameplan), what concerns us here is, the contempory crash
of the Indian National Idea (necessary to hold the country
together); its globally re-inforced/ modified resurrection & how this
compares with the previous successful emergence of the Indian National Idea –
led by Gandhi…
We cannot prevent the breakdown of the
Indian National Idea, but we can (& we are impelled on pain of global
oblivion to) resurrect the Indian national idea – to consolidate
the new global security architecute to consolidate the common ownership of info
for oil for solar powered microgeneration trade off AND the new
global written secular constitution…
To respond to Occams Razor WHY this added
geo historic complexity???
This does prevent the Jerusalem based
structures/ Universalist Conception/ constitutional culture being a Judeo/
Christian/ Islamic circle jerk – which is a precondition for a genuinely transcendent
universalist vision…
…AND it resolves the problem of Indian geo cultural
parochial insularity…
Q WHERE
is the proof that this has a hope in hell of working???
The proof is to be located in the original manifestation of
the Indian national idea – led by Gandhi.
As any attempt to mobilise/ bring sufficient forces
to bear to break British control of India tended to disintegrate into communal
strife leaving the British above the fray – indeed possessed of a kind of paradoxical
imperial legitimacy…
…Indian nationalism had to follow a specifically non
violent model (an antecedant for
the contempory Revolutionary model of a diminishing calculus of force…), so
as to render imperial control increasingly non profitable/ contributing to
exhaustion of British imperial machine & allowing an all Indian national
identity to be cultivated…
…whilst
simultaneously keeping to an irreducible minimum communal strife – by relying
principally upon the power of inertia – the sword breaking into communal
fragments upon impact
…Gandhi
seeking to make a virtue/ forge a concept of national legitimacy out
of an operational necessity…
Though
so perilously thin was this veneer of urban elite orchestrated inter communal
unity, covering the hellish depths of landlordist/ feudal communal insularity
(with Gandhi as tuning fork in chief), that as the British position became
manifestly progressively weaker (especially throughout the 1930’s), Muslims
firstly looked to British (paradoxical) imperial legitimacy to provide security
gaurentees & then ultimately/ irresistibly to the establishment of Pakistan
in areas where they had a contiguous majority…
The
principle factors that allowed the rest of India to hold together
at all as an independent entity after the British exhausted by 2
world wars…
…was
the combo of this fragile inertial concept of national political
legitimacy, most strikingly evinced in the hunger strike of Gandhi as a counter
to the post independence anti Muslim riots (following partition) & his
subsequent assassination by Hindu fascist RSS; which actually sealed the
political legitimacy/ secular identity of the Indian state – albeit dependant
on the second factor…
…That
the cold war threatened superpower engagement in any seccession. This so raised
the price of seccession, that no decisive consensus could be found to prosecute
such – enabling India via a 3rd world nationalist
ideology/ socialist fuedalist framework…
…that combined 3rd world nationalist ideology,
workers’ interests with those of feudal landlords…
….to hold together by sheer inertia.
Eg s
one of the 2 megastates, India was/ is faced with fundamental
problems that the principle cold war superstates, the USA & USSR did not originally
have.
Because of its’ size & regionalist
diversity, If India grew to be a major capitalist power, its elite be seen ever
increasingly/ inexorably by its own people (especially vis the
explosive land Q) as the main enemy (clampdowns from above threatening to spark
seccession).
Eg this was not a problem the imperial USA originally had. Until the post WWII strengthening of the hand of black labor threatened the basis of USA core elite power. Neccessitating a strategy of smashing Black radicalism under cover of the anti communist crusade (esp Vietnam war) & a switch to a global credit expansionary system based on the petrodollar – which increasingly compelled the ruling elite to regard white working/ middle classes as being the main enemy – compelling both encouraging mass migration over the border divide et imperia at home; & divestment out of the USA as deliberate policy to retain control of the USA pol/econ. Eg after trashing many other political economies to retain control of the global geo pol/econ agenda, the USA military plutocratic elite is actually trashing the USA pol/econ agenda to retain power internally & globally, or at least (unsuccessfully) try.
But neither
could/ can India industrialise/ develop on the basis of a socialist national
security state ideology like the USSR did (pointing to encircling threats).
Because, again, if it is of such size, it
does not have a narrative that allows a national security elite to retain
control (in order to retain control long enough to consolidate such
structures)…
So
by default, India adopted the (aforementioned) combo of 3rd
world nationalist ideology with essentially feudal caste ridden structures, until
increasingly, the weakening over time then collapse of the USSR…
(meaning less need or potential to
balance between USSR & USA geo politically)
…took
the shackles of Indian capitalist development – which however, as it is
confronted with the aforementioned explosive factors of Indian
wealth causing its elite to be seen as the main target, has led to an explosive
polarisation. The rise of an essentially fascistic mass movement to attempt to stabilise
such RSS/BJP/VHD on the one hand, & the rise of laftist parties, Communists
(of various types), populists, Dalits & a plethora of insurgent/ semi
insurgent groupings…
Eg
to re-iterate, aside from the brittleness of India’s development
(the steep gradient between wealthiest & oceans of poverty – at the time of
writing 14/12/06), India’s megastate aspect prevents it leading a
reconfiguration of the global capitalistpolitical economy as it be too much the
target of its own people – more even than has
proven to be the case in the USA, where as we have seen, the military
plutocratic elite took extensive pre-emptive measures to prepare
for war against its own people, & still cannot hold the
centre there (in fact said elite have been aware that if they did
re-industrialise, they would strengthen the hand of precisely the forces that
would seek a terrible revenge on them).
This
leaves India – especially vis contempory petrodollar crash – at an impasse. The
plutocratic elite cannot hold a centre together. Any attempt to stabilise via
War/ clampdown means seccession within India & a myriad of uprisings will
tear the country to pieces.
But
the orthodox left (while likely beneficiaries of popular outrage in India)
cannot consolidate a centre without a massive vision.
So. What is to be done?
The
big problem, everywhere, with insurrection in the contempory setting
as a revolutionary modality, is that it is just too damn slow. Such that long
before it is able to hold/ establish a new centre, the collapse of the old
order (secondarily undermined by the insurgency itself) causes an
irretrievable collapse into anarchy…
THIS
is why the resurrection of the Indian national idea must be
re-animated by Jerusalem centred focus borrowing heavily from the
Gandhian prototype (vis contempory model of a calculus of diminishing
force) – as precondition to enable nuclear shotgun
wedding on the basis of a stabilisation of the social revolution in security,
via spread of common ownership of info & solar powered microgeneration
(saving the river Ganges) – gyrostabilised by Universalist vision of a secular
written constitution designed to enable
humanity to gain mastery of its own
time in order to comprehend the unwritten universal
constitution to draw on the supra reserve to gain mastery of God’s creation, to
avoid being destroyed by our own creation…
Eg
to avoid whiplashing back into (an) insular apocalyptic parochialism,
re-unification with Pakistan upon such as basis is imperative…
…in
order that a re-united India can consolidate/ preserve global balance of power
by monitoring USA nuke installations – chaining up USA apocalyptic expansionism
once & for all time…
…to
free up USA visionary expansionism
&
only such a Jerusalem centred emergent/ resurrection
of the Indian National Idea, can prevent India blowing itself to smithereens in
the interim – pre Battle of Jerusalem…
China
The Chinese export led boom (brought down by the crash of the
USA petrodollar) was the product of a combination of factors…
Mao’s takeover in 1949 was far less the product of a rev
peasant war, than of the 5000 year old bureaucratic imperial mindset of Chinese
geo pol/econ…
China had always been defined in terms of the struggle to
hold itself together, especially post Genghis/ Kublya Khan.
So
wheras European nationa states went of in search of colonies to provide
resources so that they could use such to fight each other better, finance
growing out of this imperative to serve the sword, then becoming the hegemonic
factor so that the sword served finance/ industry…
Because,
paradoxically, the very size/ wealth of China meant that the relative impact of
such would have been (potentially) much more limited
…Ancient China for all its remarkable technological
accomplishments,
could not afford to allow the merchant class to be given their
head; for fear that this would undermine China’s internal fabric/ lead to
fragmentation of the country/ correspondingly expose it to invasion…
Hence the merchant class was kept in check &
therefore, all developments led to a circular dynamic, meaning the imperial
bureaucratic system was never actually replaced by a merchant class/ labor
movement, indeed the benefits of such whether in agriculture/ industry/
communications merely fed through in terms of absorption of such via a
population rise – on basis of the old order…
Correspondingly, rebellions, vis concept of the `mandate
of heaven’ tended to restore things
back to their default settings – rather than fundamentally change the socio
pol/econ order…
Indeed, post opium wars/ Taipeng & Boxer Rebellions,
such progress as did develop in China, led to increasing power of gentry
capital in such fashion as inexorably tended to/ accelerate break up of the
country – vis the warlords…
…leaving China exposed to invasion…
The consequance of this, was that neither the merchants,
especially not the workers & peasants could control/ re-unify the country…
This drove nationalists Sun Yat Sen & Chiang Kai Shek
into the arms of the USSR (& a perilous balancing act to try & retain
control of their armies).
Which meant post defeat of Japan, as the nationalistarmy
was crawling with USSR/ CCP agents, they could feed such info to the CCP as
enabled such psycho political momentum to build up, that especially with the
Russian invasion preparing their positions earlier, the nationalist position
just flaked away – leaving Mao in power…
However, it was one thing to bring Mao to power, quite
another to control China; & in this the USSR over-reached itself; for by
default what now existed, was an old restored imperial Chinese mindset with of
necessity a nominally revolutionary 3rd world nationalist ideology –
with pretensions of super power greatness…
& it was only the exhaustion of such on
a `revolutionary’ basis (vis `Great Leap Forward’ & `Cultural Revolution’)
combined with (especially as USSR weakening before USA credit expansionism)
unlocking of latent capitalist potential of Chinese peasants…
…yet kept in check, by a modified/ modernised/ reformed 3rd
world nationalist ideology…
…that enabled China’s export led boom to develop – USA
finishing the job by so buying the defeat of `communism’, by opening its
markets to Chinese goods…
But petrodollar crash
notwithstanding, as the development of the (Indian & Chinese) megastates
(whose size prevents legitimation of imperial ideology) beyond a certain point,
causes their population to see their elites as the main threat, it is only via
civil society hegemony over finance/ substantive sovereignty of the individual
(enabled by solar powered desalination) that such could/ can ever develop much further without
explosive civil strife.
Furthermore, China’s monolithic aspect
renders it more destabilisingly prone to residual imperial
delusions than say India, which because it is so
prone to fragmentation, self evidently has no option but to
embrace the outlined new geo pol/econ & constitutional framework (& new
global security architecture) – on pain
of oblivion.
So the Q is WHAT checks Chinese
imperialism???
What does NOT check Chinese imperialism is
conventional great power military containment. Eg Chavez will patience will NOT
stretch to fuelling a blue water & nuclear armed USA naval expeditionary
force to defend Taiwan.
BUT, as such an imperial enterprise (from
China, having already swallowed Tibet) represents the dissolution
of the Chinese nuclear shotgun wedding, it does threaten anarchy in China
itself – unleashing a new Taipeng…
So Chinese civil society is the best
gaurentee, as they will get it in the neck via the unleashing of a new Taipeng.
So therefore they must protect their social revolution in
security, by not only consolidating common ownership of info/ solar
powered microgeneration, but in the first place decisively
opposing adventures that would make a collapse into anarchy inexorable…
Eg China’s much more monolithic ethno cultural identity
is WHY it so desperately needs wider vision/
engagement.
For China can only be stabilized
by equality – but not as an end in itself, only as a means to an end – vis
universalist conception…
…for only via such a
constitutional mandate of heaven (seperation between written secular
constitution & unwritten universal constitution) can China be freed of ALL
emperors/ imperial pretensions/ ideologies; finally join the rest of the human
race by joining the rest of the universe4…
…for China, nothing
less will do…
Therefore China needs
global re-inforcement/ security frameworks to stabilise its development/ with
its own citizenry as a globally connected (rather than an insular) people.
Eg if we stabilise the
rest of the world, we tend to get China (more or less) for free…
As the collapse/
temporary restabilisation of USA led geo pol/econ via aforementioned Jerusalem
centred agenda, breaks through China’s insularity.
…causing the Chinese
state to be at one & the same time delegitimised AND
potentially radically modified/ relegitimised by collapse of USA led imperium.
If the Chinese state (connecting with the new global security &
constitutional agendas seeks to avoid a maelstrom far bloodier than anything
the Taipeng ever waged &) co-opts (vis another nuclear shotgun
wedding) Chinese civil society in a framework of global dialogue based on
forging the new global security architecture, solar powered desalination &
geo pol/econ constitutional framework – held together by the universalist
conception, of humanity gaining mastery over its own time (& to deal with
common threats/ objectives confronting all humanity, to gain mastery over
universal time/ become God itself)…
vis China, as the
retention of nukes self evidently equates to the retention of an insularist
national security state agenda, threatening a new Taipeng on the one hand &
conflict with its’ globally orientated/ stabilizing civil society dynamic on
the other – weakening the Chinese center before (said) Taipeng type threat (of
disintegration)…
…It shall be the
establishment of the wider global framework – especially Europe’s commitment to
South Africa – that enables Chinese civil society to provide a sufficiently
constant point of support to consolidate the new order – by pushing decisively
Chinese nuclear disarmament.
In conclusion, while the initial
overarching political agendas of India & China are captured by the
aforementioned forging of the new global security architecture – vis battle of
Jerusalem (mention again the Ganges), it is only by binding
Europe into South Africa committing Europe irrevocably to the
Global Commonwealth confederal framework/ Green Revolution, that we
sufficiently convince Chinese civil society we are serious – such that Chinese
civil society thence becomes a sufficiently constant point of
stability…
…to provide in the
context of the aforementioned managed depression/ global switch to (solar
powered desalination enabled) decentralist development, a sufficient
check to the process of internal disintegration to prevent collapse into
anarchy…
& it is the dynamic
combo of these global & micro pol/econ imperatives that maintain the
(aforementioned) resolution of the paradox of arms…
…sufficiently
to insure that even (indeed especially) amidst the collapse of the old war/
finance nexus military (plutocratic) systems, the various regional armed
formations checking China’s tendancy to military expansionism (not to say
descent into outright warlordism), are better able to buy time & space
within the minds of Chinese civil society sufficient to allow the
rev antidote to kick in, than any military plutocratic MAD system causing all
to march behind their own military plutocratic elites towards oblivion…
…indeed through such a
dynamic of containment, that as the policy decision that has consciously to be
made by everyone every day, is to choose between sustainable
development or environmental/ expansionist/ warlordist self destruction – it is
paradoxically, actually the (receeding) pre WWI/ cold war type apocalyptic
annihilatory tension that serves to keep everyone sufficiently focussed on the
end objective of the Green revolution & the Universalist Conception – so
that the latter can eclipse the receeding threat…
…even such that
sufficient degree of stable cooperation between the regional blocs can be
mounted to check the tribal narco fundamentalist/ warlordist threat from
Afghanistan, both by external containment & fostering sufficient internal
points of support with a sufficient stake in the future to check/ break said forces
of chaos in the future Edinburgh of Central Asia in a way that can only
be done via solar powered desalination giving access to electricity/ clean
water/ information to the women & children of the warlords in their very
strongholds, the last fight of such being therefore, not against USA/ USSR or
China, but with their own families & indeed with themselves…
eg you cannot abolish
by presidential or parliamentary decree, human ego/ venality/ characteristics
that have evolved over 4 billion years of earth evolution, 10 million years of
humanity & 10,000 years of the war/ finance nexus. But you can so trade off
& balance each corresponding threat off against each other, so that such
can be bridled by, to serve the culture of the common threats/ objectives
confronting all humanity, so that ultimately fear itself be ever more eclipsed
by the electrifying vision of the struggle of intelligent life to become god,
our cosmic parents & visit the same crap on the next cosmic generation….
of the USA Empire
This all begs the Q, HOW
the hell did we get into this mess???
Whereby it is only the
super apocalyptic threats that stimulate/ enable/ terrify humanity into gaining
mastery over itself???
Central to humanity’s
disabling confusion is the idea that humanity was created in the image of God,
which in turn as a corresponding reaction, gave rise to the delusion of purity
of reason…
…both exclude/ are
blind to the impurity of logic of a humanity (riven through top to bottom to
its very core with paradox) emerged over 4 billion years of earth evolution
from pondscum with the capacity to become God…
…& it follows from
this, that we be thus far blind to the historical processes (emanating from
this paradox) that have led us to this point.
WHAT is the foundation
of this delusion???
The original oppression
of humanity by nature; & with the eclipse of the natural economy, by a
rising population requiring settled agriculture & in turn the means to
defend such, the corresponding enslavement
of humanity before the first really great machine it ever created, the war/
finance nexus…
Beyond a certain point, the land
(`natural economy') could not support a rising population.
Thence it becomes necessary both
to resort (beyond an episodic/ incipient level) to settled agriculture (to feed
rising population); and also (to defend both the natural
resources of the land & its husbanded agricultural base which necessitated)
the development (beyond
an episodic/ incipient level) of
a war economy, war technology (increasingly metallurgy), which further
drove economic & technological development....
An emergent war/
finance nexus (increasing circulation of means of exchange,
especially gold/ silver, acceptable across incipient state boundaries
between allies & adversaries alike) breaking
up the earlier protohistoric economy (which tends very
much to be under-rated in it's technical sophistication) as it dictated the
social pol/econ agenda internally (within each emerging proto state construct)
and externally by setting the agenda for patterns of trade &
military pol/econ alliances....
…the corresponding
subordination of human consciousness to the hegemony of matter/ finance over
civil society…
As to argue with the
rationale of those asserting that humanity’s intellectual faculties must be
subordinated to one of the antique books, alledgedlydivinely inspired by a God
that expects humanity to take on trust the word of one of the said books, but
woe betide if you pick the wrong one – is self evidently self defeating, we
shall begin with the contempory failure
of classical rationalism, both capitalist & Marxist…
…either to hold/
re-establish a viable geo pol/econ centre of gravity on the basis of hegemony
of finance over civil society OR to enable global civil society to establish
control over finance enabling humanity to master itself…
Q. Smart Alecs like you have
been prophesying the death of capitalism since 1848. Even now a dwindling band
of flat-earthers quote Marx's words (circa 1848) about `...the choice facing
humanity being capitalism or barbarism....', without the merest hint of
sarcasm. So what conclusive proof can you offer to serve as capitalism's
death certificate?
To understand the
evidence, it is necessary to have a basic understanding of the pathology of the
capitalist/ military plutocratic system & also why Marxism/
laborism has failed.....
The question hence
arises what historically causes capitalist long-wave crisis? And is a new
cyclical long-wave boom likely?
Capital is invested in:
New productive capital (plant/machinery etc).
Workers' wages (b1), and social wages(b2), eg. real demand.
Dividends (c1) and speculation (c2).
Welfare (d1), this is derived from taxes on (b1) and an expansion of the
national debt, the costs borne predominately by workers, therefore it cannot
properly be considered an additional part of real demand. And corporate welfare (d2), this includes
arms contracts, pension scams, profit guarantees etc.
Capital is motivated by
the pursuit of surplus profits (above the average rate of profit), causing
capital to flow into those sectors where profits are highest.
Over the expansionary
long-wave, the organic composition of capital (a), its' productivity, rises
faster than workers' wages and social wages (b1,b2), real demand; which
rise but not sufficiently to absorb all the products of (a) over the long-run.
This is called over-accumulation (of capital).
This over-accumulation
of capital in a given sector, or the economy in general, causes market
saturation or over-production; as there isn't' sufficient real
demand to absorb all the products. This happens because the pressure of capital
for growth in its' assets or a return on its' investment (c1), causes
over-accumulation - productivity to grow out of kilter with real demand.
This causes the rate of profit to fall in real industry (over the
long-run) below the culturally expected level (ranging from country to country
dependant on the relationship of class/imperial forces).
When this fall in the
rate of profit takes place in a certain sector or sectors, this causes periodic
downturns (in a period of general upswing), until (with weaker concerns
bankrupted etc) the rate of profit recovers to the average rate of profit.
When this process of
over-accumulation and market saturation becomes generalised throughout the
productive economy, capital finds itself caught between two fires:
Corresponding falling real demand (of workers and social wages absorbing
production).
(in context of general preceeding longwave boom) demands for higher
wages (threatening the rate of profit and over-accumulated capitals' share).
Unless (impossibly
unlikely) capitalism were to voluntarily accept an evolving loss of hegemony
(over control of production) and concedes either an evolving and continuous
rise in wages or (preferably) in social wages, to bring the production/real
demand relationship into kilter (for sustainable, stable and continuous
growth), the situation cannot be (peacefully) resolved.
This crisis leads to a
build up of inflationary pressures - the struggle for surplus value - as
capital seeks to pass the costs (of its profits) on either in higher prices to
consumers or trades-union aided `social contracts', holding wages down
threatening investment strikes & lockouts. And increasingly there is
a regressive long-term switch of capital into speculation (c2),
including the expansion of credit (against inflated property prices); and a
growing dependency on military contracts (squeezing real demand still further)
and corporate welfare (d2) - combined with a squeeze on (b1, b2 and d1).
However as the only
source of real wealth is real industry, these financial/speculative
`investments', serve only to further milk the productive base of industry (and
real demand able to absorb production), with demands for ever higher dividends
- effectively treating capital as (unsustainable) income. Capitalism therefore
has an increasing tendancy to disappear up its' own speculative arsehole (see
rise and fall in land/house prices etc).
It is a myth/lie that
interests rates are used to `combat inflation'. The only way they `work' is by
discouraging productive economic activity. This hammers real demand giving the
purely cosmetic statistical appearance of lower inflation (reduced
economic activity).
In fact the raising of
interest rates only serves to increase (proportionately & aggregately) the
demands of parasitic finance (for ultimately higher dividends) on the
productive base of the economy, weakening real demand (eg. increasing
exorbitant mortgage/rent rates and chronic indebtedness - REVEALED NOT
CAUSED - when the speculative/property
bubble bursts) institutionalising inflation (in hidden form, see
indebtedness) and increasing susceptibility to inflationary pressures over the
long-term (& ultimately a global credit crunch leading to global
stagflation/ hyperinflation).
Low nominal
inflation conceals the impact of indebtedness and therefore merely illustrates
the triumphal victory of capital over labor's capacity (through traditional
means) to resist this continuous and permanent assault.
The sole
function and purpose of raising (real) interest rates is to restore the
position of (especially unproductive finance) capital over labor in a period of
crisis/permanent crisis, and nothing more. To re-iterate industry cannot/dare
not resist, because this would mean mobilising the masses, who would then
in turn force their own more radical agenda afterwards.
The problem can be
summarised simply as:
Capitalism is out of kilter viz real demand and accumulation
There is no (automatic) pol/econ mechanism to correct this. Eg. via
increased wages and/or social wages - WPCs preventing capital being/becoming
(again) a law unto itself - freeing a democratic parliament/local govt to play
this (redistributive) role.
Such long-term crisis
when resolved/resolvable, were done so through a long-term rise in wages
(necessary to provide the basis for a long-term upswing) after a
re-ordering of the productive forces (the national & global division of
labor - in turn) prepared & aided by a long-term fall (in the
previous period of long-term downswing) in wages (by the reccessionary long-wave)
and a decline in productive investment - raising the (potential) rate of
profit after (the implementation of) revolutionary reform - As a starting
point, from which the long-wave boom then generates its' own momentum, with
reforms & rises in wages - until it eventually collapses due to
over-accumulation.
The key examples are:
Post-Chartism & Revolutions of 1848 - After the break-up of the
hegemony of landed capital (by the abolition of the corn-laws and the last
remnants of feudalism in Europe) foreign trade was expanded and the (real)
domestic purchasing power was driven up by
a) A reduction in the price of bread, meaning people had more real
demand/purchasing power to purchase industrial products.
b) A raising in the price of labor (caused by extra industrial activity
by foreign trade and a)-), as demand for labor grew; so did its' ability to
bargain/push for higher wages in turn creating more (real) demand.
Until
over-accumulation/market saturation brought the long-wave expansion to an end
in the early-mid 1870's - beginning a long-wave downturn.
Gladstone/ Asquith (continental Europe had similar variants) - With a
new rise in radical politics & militant trades-unionism, threatening to
assume revolutionary-political characteristics (brought about by the early -mid
1870's - late1880's reccessionary wave).
a) Simply allowing laborism to force higher pay (and later Asquiths'
more pro-active) reforms expanded the purchasing power of labor (whilst cutting
the ground from the more extreme elements).
b) An expansion into new colonies creating new markets - in turn raising
demand for labor/wages and real demand.
Until over-accumulation
& market saturation led to the crunch battle for markets of WW1, and the
collapse of national capitalisms in Europe.
The Global Political-Economy - The fall in real
wages brought about by the victory of fascism across continental Europe
(smashing the labor movement) - and the (liberal imperialist) development of
the global pol/econ by the process of WW2 enabling USA led global
rev-reform FDR having implemented rev reform in USA
beforehand, in response to the
revolutionary shock of Huey p Longs’ `Share the Wealth’ campaign in the context
of the Great depression – of which more later) in response to the post - WW2
radical uprisings/expansion of the USSR empire into central Europe; provided
the starting point for the boom & expansion of free-trade
& world market (representing an advance on the old national capitalist
systems of imperial preference & tariffs that preceded them), Which then as
before, could generate their own development/momentum.
Conversely, the
rise of global finance can be seen as not merely another stage of development
but as a quantum pol/econ dynamic, that will either lead to its' (structural and
molecular) revolutionary metamorphosis, or its savage implosion. As no single
state is capable of taking the lead in the global reform of the system as
FDR/USA was able to before.
Eg the rise of global finance beyond
the control of the nation state has eliminated all room for bargaining between
capital & labor....
...& with it all
room for revolutionary reform/ reconfiguration of the geo political/ economic
system in response to radical shocks, such as had previously been implemented -
when the state was strong enough to
act as arbiter between capital & labor.
For threatened by a
hemorrhage of hot money (seeking the highest short term return) the state must
either carry out policies finance capital likes, eg conducive to short term
speculative profits at the expense of industrial investment and reconstruction
(which of course makes things worse over the long run), or alternatively carry
through a comprehensive revolutionary transformation of the political economy,
insuring all profits are re-invested in industrial civil reconstruction
(instead of share dividends and speculation).
For it is simply not worth the aggro
and chaos finance capital will cause (eg through currency destabilisation and
capital flight), trying to cling to this or that minor reform. Or indeed by
resisting the swingeing cuts in services, investment & workers' wages;
hence also the permanent war on workers' civil rights viz the need to
consolidate this process politically.
Moreover the (global
manifestation &) consequences of this policy....
....the
arms race to bankrupt/ destroy the USSR coupled with USA's backing (arming/
financing) of Islamic (& other) fascists in the 3rd world (in order to
maintain 3rd world peoples in their subservience to core imperial elite) who choking
on the despair they (in partnership with USA led military plutocracies) themselves
created, turn their rage on the west (accelerating its slide into military
pol/econ anarchy).....
....&
USA nuclear blackmail/ threats against China, leading to China developing
nukes, scaring India & correspondingly Pakistan into going nuclear...
...demonstrate that this
reconstruction must be global, requiring wartime sacrifices to further
fund it - or else in keeping the 3rd world crushed, the state will choke on its
own barbed wire & a degenerate military plutocratic elite will re-emerge by
default.
&
Megastates India & China cannot take over leadership from USA, as due to
their sheer size, their military plutocratic elites' (anti colonial) national
security state justification for existing is actually undermined by the growth
of their economy, revealing them to their own citizenry as their greatest
enemy (rather than any foreign power defending them from)... just as USA core
(imperial) elite is undermined by its eclipse by global finance.........
.....this
is why it is impossible for the megastates to eclipse USA as a new core
military plutocratic power, (as USA formerly eclipsed Britain)... so military
plutocratic power pathology compels these 2 megastates along with USA (&
also Japan/ proxy elites); to engineer wars/ pretexts to justify their
remaining in control of the geo pol/econ agenda; even to the extent of
destroying the world (just to retain, control for as long as it takes to
destroy it).
(We
deal with the apocalyptic issues related to the collapse of the Russian
compradorist regime in `Intro to Quantum Materialism' & `Substance Over
Form', but as the global coup has dramatically given USA Caesarism aggressive
command of/ a pretext to control the geo pol/econ agenda, we must adapt our
strategy/ gameplan to the framework of imminent/ actual USA nuclear terror,
rather than risk being conceptually outgunned)
As clearly, capitalism
could only be saved from itself by the tough love of the working classes, this
begs the Q, WHY on earth did they time
& again fail so miserably to assume overlordship, to the extent that
organised labor has been wiped out by the power of global finance…
What happened to laborism/ Marxism
illustrates its limitations as a reactive force…
…Eg
equality as an end in itself, is self evidently the most
unviable of options – lacking the social econ glue/ allegiances organically
present in the 10,000 year old war/ finance nexus…
…therefore
as noted equality cannot be stabilized as an end in itself, only as a
means to an end, to enable education of everyone vis (to deal with)
overarching culture of the common threats/ objectives confronting all humanity…
…which paradoxically
requires the contempory apocalyptic threats arising from the final exhaustion
of all organic/ latent potential for development on the basis of hegemony of
finance over civil society, of matter over consciousness; to enable the level
of desperation required to forge both new global security architecture &
the new geo constitutional/ cultural agenda based on enabling humanity to gain
mastery of universal time, become God & visit the same crap on the next
cosmic generation (as per the Universalist Conception)…
Then WHY was the
Russian revolution even possible???
......in the case of Russia/
USSR (In 1917)....
(understanding how/ why USSR
collapsed & how this relates to the military plutocracy's inability to
reconfigurate/ reform itself in response
to a radical shock is key to understanding how/ why the Revolution can seize
control of the global military pol/econ agenda & why it couldn't before)
....The inability of landlordist
capitalism to confer on itself parliamentary legitimacy (via elections)
due to the land/ war Qs (unlike German, French, British counterparts etc) meant the soviet was the only bearer of political legitimacy.
Correspondingly (unlike
in the west), the Bolsheviks could simply lie their way to
power by pretending things would be hunky dory `Peace, Bread & Land' to win
soviet legitimacy.
....finishing
of Russian landlordism, but simultaneously & inevitably
paralysing the Revolution in the west by re-inforcing the same
ineffectual classical laborist mode as before...
...as radicals blinded
by the Russian Revolution to the need to combine a rev reconstructionist
pol/econ framework with rev pol
campaign to delegitimise the Euro finance capitalist regimes, buttressed by
participation in elections to prevent the regime re-legitimising itself/
squeeze its position continuously
(a campaign held together by hunger strikes of
antifascist PoWs - such as would have been viable in the contempory
situation had not September 11th raised the stakes & forced the Revolution
to raise them again likewise/ recalibrate its' operational strategy
accordingly; to simultaneously take on ALL apocalyptic threats from all
quarters in an operationally integrated framework –
To see the various pre & post Sept 11th
2001 rev paradigms, see `Substance Over Form’ vols I-IV, included in
Lucifer2.2.zip
A point of interest, to illustrate how ideas evolve
with wider geo pol/econ potentiality; even after Sept 11th 2001, as
the USA was preparing for the Iraq war, we could NOT have committed to a
Jerusalem centred gameplan UNTIL the USA definitively committed on the rgound
& therefore the quagmire was inevitable)
…unable to win power,
.....though
the residual strength of the British/ French nation states/ empires was also
an insurmountable problem in the way of forging a Euro Commonwealth of the
regions (by locking radicalism within the operational framework of the nation
state),
& as German radicals could not
consolidate a Marxist/ Stalinist framework (nor the new model rev theory), by
default control of the military pol/econ agenda went to the political
warlordist Nazis (backed by German military plutocracy as the only way open to
them to try & retain control of the military pol/econ agenda).
......until,
USA & contempory finance, out of the goodness of their hearts, did us the
enormous favor of reducing Britain to a semi colonial outpost; which ENABLES
the British to lead the Euro Revolution (defining Europe as a bulwark against
USA apocalyptic expansionism, freeing USA visionary expansionism…),
as nukes notwithstanding, we (in Britain) are too piddling to be a threat to
anyone but ourselves.
- they also lacked the threat of nuclear
oblivion to drive a reconstructionist Rev pol/econ framework forward,
&
every christ needs its' anti-christ).
The latent potential
of USA led capital
did the rest, its latent strength/ capacity to absorb the radical geo shock (of
Russian Revolution/ USSR expansion into Eastern Europe post WWII/ growth of
Communist parties geo politically) enabled post WWII reform/ reconfiguration of
global pol/econ after fascism in west Europe had driven
down wages, providing the foundation
for a longwave boom (propelled further by long term rising wages) after
its defeat.
(Historically,
reccessionary long term falls in wages, combined with radical upsurge,
stimulated reforms/ reconfiguration of the global pol/econ, which led to a long
term increase in wages/ real as opposed to speculative demand: eg the repeal of
the corn laws to cut the ground from
rev anti landlordist Chartism in 1847, combining colonial expansion with toleration of trade union bargaining in
the 1890s, but post WWI, ONLY
the USA vis FDR was strong enough to reform/ reconfigurate its own
pol/econ in response to the internal shock of Huey P. Long's `Share the Wealth'
movement & therefore LEAD geo politically, the reform of global
military plutocracy).
Stalinism: the direct
product of collapse of landlordist capitalism combined with the bolsheviks
lie/ failure to pre-educate urban masses on need for sacrifices for
reconstruction....
....their
consequent failure to use the kulaks to
eliminate the middle peasantry & in
turn tax them to the hilt for primary accumulation (civil society control of
the econ through socialist finance, instead of party
control via the police)...
....(BOTH)
resulting in reactionary egalitarian chaos (consumption of surplus
product for subsistence instead of investment) which could only
be stabilised by nat sec state repression, justified by external enemies/
threats, a framework which enabled cycles of partial reform of the system
(development of a reconstructionist agenda/ primary accumalation for
investment/ development) while the Stalinist national security elites retained
control of the agenda (helped by very real external threats)....
Stalinism
depended on a combination of the nat sec state excuse AND
on geo room for bargaining/ growth within/ subordinate to GLOBAL
capitalist hegemony precisely BECAUSE laborism dependant on room
for bargaining between capital & labor, could not overthrow capitalism in
the core states – to enable socialist democracy to eclipse Stalinism…
(USA capitalism for its part
could not crush USSR without crushing internal laborism, which there was no
overwhelming drive to do for as long as internal radicalism could be absorbed
by reforms granted via dynamic reconfiguration of the global capitalist
pol/econ in response to radical shocks
- as it was unnecessary/ not generally worth the core elite's while to do so)…
......But, when the
post war boom strengthened the hand of Black radicalism in USA, the
threat of a connexion with working class whites etc,
the USA union leaders did not set up their own
labor party as it would have been flooded by blacks taking it in a
revolutionary direction, out of their control
The
legacy of slavery/ civil war/ segregation being that wheras the state had
legitimacy for whites, for blacks this was not the case; therefore USA blacks
initial political engagement tended to be revolutionary. Even where as in the
South, Martin Luther King leant on a liberal section of the state for support
vis civil rights campaign……This inexorably tipped over into a push for economic
justice/ democracy – which furthermore challenged the legitimacy of the entire
USA led geo pol/econ military plutocratic framework eg vis Vietnam war; with
revolutionary implications – immediately prior to his assassination/
corresponding eclipse of civil rights movement by the Black Panther Party……&
this corresponding absence of a USA labor party, because racialised class
pressures/ divisions were/ are so acute, meant classical bourgeois democracy
(in USA) very weak & unable to rule through parliamentary parties without
an independent (presidential) strongman to pose as arbiter between the
classes.…
But, there was (vis HP Long) scope for a
presidential figure to seek & acquire an alternative (anti regime) power
base (leaning on civil society in a struggle with regime) – linking a
presidential figure/ campaign with an ever increasingly radicalised civil
society…
... as HP Long did vis his `Share the Wealth’
campaign (in the context of the Great Depression) that began in the poorer backward states (especially Louisiana)
in deep south (against Louisiana gentry) that as of necessity (to accomplish/
entrench its anti landlordist tasks) increasingly (broadened its’ base by)
attacking hegemonic finance capital throughout the USA – which though was still
strong enough (in USA) vis FDR’s leadership, to reform itself in response to
such a revolutionary shock; & was done so by giving the New Deal teeth.
Q WHY was there not another HP Long?
Such potential was largely (though not
entirely) eclipsed by the cold war (Earl K Long being the dynastic exception that
proved the rule). Eg `are you a communist’ would have been more deadly than in
the America of the great depression, prior to the post WWII national security
state.
….this triggered a geo
pol/econ clampdown....
....the Vietnam war (military
plutocracy could not pull out of Vietnam until
Blacks crushed by Cointelpro, covert
intelligence program, preventing a fusion with white working class),
in order to make safe the...
shift to a speculative finance/
credit expansionary based economy, preserving the independance of capital from
civil society control in the context of ever diminishing room for
bargaining between capital & labor - which found political expression in the Thatcher/ Reagan axis,
Eg
(under cover of the Vietnam war) this political crisis, was
actually resolved through the consequant
geo economic crisis.....
The
global (deferred) battle for surplus value (between capital & labor) was
reflected in the inflationary build up, reflected in weakening $. Eg USA came
of the gold standard in 1971, but maintained/ strengthened its position as
global reserve currency…
The
inexorable tendancy of the global reserve (defacto fiat) currency
to over appreciate…
(either
or simaltaneously, in terms of nominal values or in terms of over
absorption of said currency as a `stable’ value)
…is
both the prime manifestation and merely the innate reflection of,
the hegemony of the war/ finance nexus over civil society, of matter/ automatic
material development) over human consciousness.
This
is a partly organic phenomenon, but as the core state in charge of such
becomes (self evidently) inexorably addicted to the advantages of such (to print
$$$, passing on its own inflation/ hyperinflation to the rest of the
world), it becomes ever more an engineered phenomenon.
…by
fixing a secret deal with the medievalist Arab (Saudi) sheiks by offering
`protection’ in return for all oil deals being charged in $$$ - `this gave the
USA an unlimited credit card’ – the basis for longterm credit expansionary
boom; which also financed the USA war machine which in turn protected the USA’s
unlimited credit card…
The rise in oil prices as a
result of the war in the mideast (between Israel & Egypt) & aforementioned
dollar weakness/ long term boom
creating shortages/ strengthening the hand of the oil producer states in
relation to the USA/ core states....
The core problem is
that the war/ finance nexus (military plutocracy) reigns as a law unto itself,
making it impossible to establish political economic mechanisms to guide
development, to meet long term threats to human survival in a concerted
way (eg resource oil shortages/ environmental impact of genetic engineering from biocorps beholden
to no-one but their shareholders & even the much bigger projects/ threats
posed by climatic change....)
......which impact of
led to capital eclipsing the USA core empire....& therefore
meant that USA radical forces were outflanked by switch to credit/ speculative
expansion…
…(we
examined the original Federal Reserve scam in Chapter 4)....
…which meant that while USA radical forces were
trashed, there were enough of USA civil
society profiting from this system to
keep USA regime stable while the radicals could be outflanked/ crushed under cover of ideological
`anticommunism'/ Vietnam war…
...(eg the
petrodollars flooded back into USA fuelling longwave credit/ speculative
expansion.... & in turn recycled to Latin America dictators/ which came
back as capital flight plunder, facilitating USA led military plutocratic
loansharking (ratcheting up of
interest rates to astronomical levels) their systemic passing costs of
crisis onto 3rd world..... - as Joseph Stigliz ex World
Bank Chief now admits was the role of
his organisation....
- also of
note is that this (interest rate trap) was the original cause of Yugoslavia's
disintegration... growing debt led to tensions between the republics,
& ultimately the desperate playing of the nationalist card in a desperate
attempt by the elites to retain control of the pol/econ agenda....
this is analysed in Vol I Chapter 7 of
S.O.F.)......
&
Reaganite war boom ....
....the REAL objective
of the Vietnam war was to keep USA Black & White divided to stabilize USA
led military plutocracy & this the enemy accomplished/ won…
furthermore the slaughter of 6 million Vietnamese so raised the costs of
rebellion against the USA imperium, that this in turn further aided the
development of export led geo strategic buffer states especially in east Asia
further hemming in the USSR.
These factors led to the
strengthening of USSR’s parasitic military bureaucratic elite & its’
corresponding internal econ collapse…
…what insured this
collapse took place in a controlled fashion was the exhaustion of
the credibility of the USSR elite by the trap set for them by the USA in
Afghanistan…
Eg the corresponding
collapse of credibility of USSR regime, producing a temporary, but decisively
fatal, popular infatuation with all things western – specifically economic
ideology, which gave power (control of the pol/econ agenda) to a class of
oligarchical resource compradors, who in spite of rapidly growing unpopularity,
were able to retain control by virtue of the fact that the newly (& temporarily)
politically enfranchised Russian civil society were reluctant to
get too close to the old soviet managers to oppose increasingly fascist
compradors…
Eg even in the context of Yeltsin’s
1993 coup (as it was unfolding), Yeltsin retained just enough credibility
as a democrat, for there to be just enough of a drag factor on the
accummalation of support for Rutskoi/ Khasbulatov (leaders of Parliament
against Yeltsin’s coup), for Yeltsin to be able to set a trap by lifting the
police cordon, so that under their own undisciplined momentum, the (still)
inadequate base of support would attempt to launch a premature insurrection –
enabling Yeltsin to crush it with scarcely loyal troops.
But even if parliament had been able
to restrain its supporters from taking the bait, had instead patiently
martialed their forces (prior to restoring constitutional authority)…
…a military bureaucratic elite would
if only be reluctant geo pol/econ default have resecured control of the
internal geo pol/econ agenda as result of fears (& of course machinations
to so trap them) of western geo political expansionism in the former Yugoslavia
& elsewhere – which would have led to collapse/ compradorism again by a
more convoluted route…
…the Chechen wars correspondingly
were about burning of any threat from either the right (a la Hitler/
Zhirinovsky)or (more probably) the institutional progressive left (General
Alexander Lebed) by deliberately degrading the army so as to prevent it
functioning either as a fascist/ warlordist expansionist threat or (more likely
a) powerbase against compradorism…
…Eg by time Yeltsin’s democratic
credentials lost, it was too late, as able to retain power by sheer inertial
default – for oligarchical compradorism…
…Eg USA backed Islamic
tribal fascists/ warlords in a way deliberately calculated to lure in the USSR
– anxious to prevent not merely collapse of a friendly govt (that also upheld
women’s rights etc), but the threat of Islamic fascism gaining such critical
momentum that USSR’s nukes in Central Asia be over-run by Islamic fascist
warlords – designed to turn Afghanistan into USSR’s Vietnam – so that regime
authority flaked away as it (had no choice but to) fought a losing battle to
raise the costs of such ventures sufficient to prevent geo psycho political
momentum leading Islamic fascists over-running USSR’s Central Asian nukes…
Critical to this USA
orchestrated campaign was the strategic depth of this campaign – based on USA’s
historic alliance with Islamic fascism…
Eg as mideast was not
their backyard (like Latin America) necessity compelled them to lean on
authentic independent/ autonomous forces…
Unlike in Latin America, where axis
of military fascist compradors, landlords & colonial multinationals could
hire the thugs required & employ the tactical expertise/ resources
necessary to maintain control…
…Paradoxically also having a shared
Christian culture meant such was less effective as an agency of control – as
such would be too transparent a means of control, so that paradoxically gave rise
to Liberation Theology as a way to define seperateness from colonial overlords
Furthermore (as noted)
the geo historical culture (of the Islamic world) was highly conducive to such
– as the cultural vortices of Mecca/ Medina were too big for any single (rather
weak) nation states to control, hence the Saudi Royal/ Islamic fascist clerical
axis, to cover their flank against a milinairist convergence…
Q Why
was Rome not similarly susceptible to such a millenialist
convergence???
As already noted (vis conflict over
control over Holy Sepulchre between different Christian factions – contained by
Muslim gatekeepers) the centre of power of Christendom (vis Church) lies in Jerusalem…
…as evinced by the Crusades &
popes attempts to garner power by promoting such – however as this is the flashpoint
between 3 geo cultures, it is less viable as a reliable source of
power than Mecca was (in the Islamic world).
So that without
reliable control of the cradle of Christian ideology, the church could not
ideologically eclipse the power of the nation state as was seen
as the mere tool of national interests, wether the Italianate Princes, Spain or
France…
This made Islamic
fascism/ millennialism a powerful geo political weapon vis anticommunism…
Not only in Afghanistan
(with Saudis paying regular danegeld to such to wage their campaigns outside of
Saudi Arabia) & correspondingly the Pakistan of general Zia, the use of
such by Anwar Sadat against leftists in Egyptian universities, by Israel’s Shin
Bett against secular Palestinian radicals, an earlier anti
communist alliance in Iran that deposed Mossadegh as premier (until the
excesses of the Shah so offended Iranian national consciousness that this
became untenable for clerics seeking to retain infleuence over their people)
& other such…
But at a price.
Which was that as
Islamic fascists hated the result of their alliance with the USA (arising from
the conduct of both), & as such was obviously not their
fault, this deepened their antipathy to USA – a growing pestilential cult of
psycho political transference…
…manifesting itself at
a number of levels, including increased power/ infleuence for Islamic fascists/
repression of women; particularly lack of access to birth control – leading to
a horrendous demographic crisis/ increasing/ entrenching poverty which
broadens/ deepens the culture of psycho political transference…
Whatever the truth behind 9/11…
Wether it was simply `blowback’
&
the CIA have given their word that they had no assets in the region at the time
– presumably having lost interest in Pakistan after it became a nuclear power so Qs
of CIA/ ISI/ Taliban/ Al Qaeda connexions – including vis old CIA asset, one
Osama Bin Laden, do not arise
or a super GLADIO type plot/ or a Grand Strategy of Tension plot (as Alex Jones & the 9/11 Truth Movement, and ex German defense chief Andreas Von Bulow assert) - to secure control of the geo psycho political agenda for a war to establish such bases as would position them to protect the petrodollar from those less than happy with their end of the deal
…We can/ must begin anew from the
investigative & strategic foundation of understanding 9/11 & the
wars that follow in its wake, culminating in the Iran war…
…as the product of the conspiracy that gives itself away, the petrodollar (& petrodollar alliance); the source of ALL USA military plutocratic power established 28 (now 33) years previously…
…which propels directly & indirectly, every (military/ political/ economic) apocalyptic dynamic from the top to the bottom of the global political economy…
…& how by
addressing the threat from such, humanity can break free from the apocalyptic
control of the 10,000 year war/ finance nexus, to gain conscious mastery of its
own destiny
…& the current (as
at 26/2/06) dance of death between a USA regime seeking to prop up the
petrodollar (maniacally threatening anyone & everyone, not just
overthrowing Saddam Hussein, fixing a war with Iran; but even Venezuela has
come into USA regime’s bombsights)/ sleepwalking into via its’ narrative
concept of `America’s manifest destiny to lead the world to the kingdom of
Christ’; into `preparing the way for the `Rapture’ (whereupon our Lord &
Saviour returning to glory on a mushroom cloud shall deliver up our apple pie munching
bretheren & smite the rest of us); & clashing with their counterparts
in the Islamic world (eg the Iranians awaiting the 12th Imam) to
help prop up the petrodollar/ OR bring on the Rapture. Whatever.
The Q of USA backing for Israeli expansionism,
in this ergard has a double character…
…on the one hand it does
represent a fundamental general & indeed legitimate fear that if not stood
up to, if the issue is ignored, no Arab land is sacrosanct from
colonial plunder/ outright theft…
…which has fed into the logic of
national security state regimes that could be played of against each other…
Such
as USA/ Saudi’s encouraging Saddam Hussein (originally aided by CIA as the
alternative to Iraqi Communists consolidating power) to invade the Shat Al Arab
waterway – leading to 1 million dead in
Iran/ Iraq war (& curiously also the national security consolidation
against Iranian leftist by the theocrats), but requiring such increased
production of oil as to lower the price of oil – resolving the oil crisis for
the USA led geo pol/econ regime…
&
in this context (after Iran/ Iraq war) April Glaspies’ comments about USA `not
getting involved in Arab border disputes’ when (as Jude Wanniski noted) Saddam
Hussein complained about Kuwait drilling/ stealing oil from under Iraqi
borders’ sub strat, would certainly be consistent with USA imperial interests
vis a strategy of containment of Iraq to prevent any, especially a nuclear
power emerging in the region which could threaten USA interests – by so provoking
Iraq into invading Kuwait as to give a pretext for USA to maintain imperial
hegemony…
But it also represents a kind of
political adolescence, that serves as an excuse for not addressing mideast
disunity (especially between Sunni & Shia), the need for a secularised
progressive vision/ women’s rights/ education/ power to stabilise the
apocalyptic demographics; & above all using in a cencerted
fashion, the oil card as a lever to engineer such…
…but, as the whole world (including/
epecially the west) has (as noted) an adolescent attachment to apocalyptic
threats/ WMD etc, it is perhaps appropriate, that the Palestine Q can only
be resolved by using it as the conduit to forge the new global
security architecture enabling the resolution of such threats - & that this
process be led by an elderly adolescent (yours truly)
Whence, at the battle
of Jerusalem, humanity, with the mothers as the moral vanguard eclipsing/
resolving the paradox of arms, takes ownership & responsibility for their revolution
& their world…
As at 14/8/05 the
entire system has long been entirely contingent on massive USA expansion of USA
budget/ trade deficit to fuel this process & the Asian exporters
(including/ especially China) being willing to underwrite USA’s deficits
because if they do otherwise the entire system will crash instantaneously into
the abyss)…
…leading to manifest
crises of overproduction/ falling rate of profit, due to production
outstripping real demand, catalysing (with rising unemployment) a further
collapse of real demand, (frenetically competitive) soaring interest rates (to
try to prop up the currencies), hyperinflation & the aforementioned geo
pol/econ tailspin….
To illustrate the truly
remarkable way the rust has held the system together for so long, what strengthened
this perverse arrangement was how, in the early 90’s, interest rates
came down dramatically, when the class struggle appeared decisively won by the
elites, further enabling the shift to a combo of ever looser
credit expansion & corresponding over accumalation in the emergent markets…
…Eg beforehand. The
weapon of high interest rates was an organic weapon/ mechanism to deter
political intervention by the state keen to arbitrate between interests of
capital & labor; or even compel finance to subordinate itself to the
interests of civil society
& when President
Clinton attempted to clip back the budget deficit, weakening demand for East
Asian goods, the result was the SE Asian crisis of 1998, triggering organic
switch of hot money to the dollar as a so called safe haven currency, which
organically fuelled a new wave of USA import led credit expansionary boom…
Eg the underlying logic
being, if the arse falls off the dollar, this will trigger such a geo pol/econ
tailspin, that the consequent soaring interest rates/ global credit crunch/
hyperinflationary death spiral means that no other currency can be a `safe
haven’.
Indeed the fact that
the USA is now propped up by the fact that the dollars fall (vis trade/ budget
deficit – generated speculative finance/ credit expansion) creates expectation
of higher interest rates & therefore dampens demand/ price of oil/ causing
a contra tendancy for the dollar to rebound; therefore
temporarily stabilising the inexorable (general) propensity to eventual dollar
collapse catalysing soaring interest rates, global credit crunch/
hyperinflation & corresponding apocalyptic geo pol/econ tailspin (including
in the mideast)…
…Is sufficient to
demonstrate that USA nuke attack against Iran would not enable a
temporarily stabilised nuke terrorist control of the geo pol/econ agenda,
merely trigger (the final) geo pol/econ meltdown/ historical electrocution in
any case…
…as we shall see later, this
fact is the one factor that will give humanity a small window of opportunity to
seize command of its own destiny when geo pol/econ meltdown does occur…
… if we fail to exploit it to the
full, then from a variety of apocalyptic standpoints we face collective
annihilation…
Before we move onto the
phenomenon of Sept 11th 2001 & the consequent geo pol/econ
paradox of apocalyptic stability, we should clarify why
neither China nor India nor anyone else, can lead a new rev reformist
reconfiguration of the global military plutocratic system…
in the way outlined earlier to recap:
1) The
British by repealing the corn laws in 1847 (in response to the revolutionary
threat from Chartism) enabled cheap imported grain to increase both
domestic & foreign purchasing power/ increased demand for British
manufactures & a multiplier effect of consequent rising long term wages
leading to rising real demand/ longwave econ boom until approx 1870…
2) Whence
market saturation led to a longwave fall in wages leading to political/ general
union radicalism – which was resolved by a combo of colonial expansion into/
carve up of Africa, creating the economic space (vis expanded markets) to
increase wages…
…the internal
brittleness of the European states, their diminishing capacity for reform/
rising laborist expecting squeezing the nation state elites, pushing them into
the 1914-1945 conflict…
NB* only in Russia did a laborist revolution
take power, because only in Russia did the land war/ political legitimacy Q
merge in such a fashion that elections were not possible for fear of a general
land war, destroying elites outright, which meant only the soviet
held political legitimacy & therefore could take power just
by promising `peace, bread, land – not possible in the parliamentary
states where the land, war, political legitimacy Q did not fuse so starkly…
…After which only the USA (reforming
itself internally vis FDR’s NEW Deal given teeth in response to the
revolutionary shock of Huey P Longs’ `Share the Wealth’ movement) was capable
of leading the global rev reform of the military plutocratic system – in
response to radical shock of USSR’s westward expansion…
…which led us to the internal
crisis vis rise of black radicalism threatening to merge with white labor &
need for its repression under cover of the Vietnam war & switch to a
speculative finance based credit expansionary system.
…For when the USA was a
rising power, it was stabilised by the vast opportunities afforded by the
ethnic cleansing of the original inhabitants combined with waves
of cheaper immigrant labor filling up the vast spaces of an essentially
imperial enterprise (believing ever more in its manifest destiny)…
…it also acted as stabiliser of the British/ European
nation states, by functioning as an alternative to frustration/ political dissent
in said old countries…
This is not the case with extremely brittle
megastates of China & India – for whom because of their sheer size, as they
acquire a certain degree of strength come to be seen by their own people as the
main threat to their interests/ security (rather than any other foreign state)
& which modern states came into being as specifically 3rd world
national liberationist entities – in which capitalism cannot rule in its own
name without this catalysing said explosive dynamic even earlier…
In China (formerly part of the core radical grouping to
break away from imperial control – to establish the contempory state; & now
in a paradoxical sense BOTH an ideologically 3rd world socialist
state AND the last & greatest of the USA enabled buffer states to socialist
expansion), Chinese capitalism cannot even rule in its own name & so the
more it develops, the more it must depend upon nationalism as a dangerous means
to try & maintain control of the internal geo pol/econ agenda – just as USA
does the same as it loses imperial control (in a way analogous to the way that
limited pre WWII Chinese development caused japan to take fright & launch a
pre-emptive colonial assault); in both USA & china leading to geo pol/econ
& social liquifaction – were this process not cut across by collapse of USA
credit expansionism beforehand…
Wheras in India, it was only the eclipse of the USSR,
that cut across India’s socialist fuedalist paradigm, that combined 3rd
world nationalist ideology, workers’ interests with those of feudal landlords…
…that (for geo cultural/ political reasons, including the
need to match China) similarly allowed Indian capitalism to develop…
Eg post WWII (after independence won from a weakened
Britain, handing over power to avoid India lining up with the core radical bloc
etc) India’s centripetal tendancies held in check by combo of this 3rd
wordlist ideology & the fact that to develop either a socialist bloc
program or baldly pro USA approach would have led to superpower engagement/
support on either side, which would so obviously have led to the self defeating
ruination of the objective, that a decisive consensus could never be found to
advance such causes (rendering them inherently abortive). Hence post
independence, socialist feudalism held India together by sheer inertia…
&, the collapse of this consensus (with collapse of
the USSR) while unleashing the latent power of Indian capitalism, means that as
the Dalits also increasingly begin to see Indian megastate capitalism (elites
in general especially landlords – vis the explosive land Q merging with the
megastate Q vis elites being seen) as the MAIN enemy of their own people/
interests. In turn unleashing a new (or reconstituted/ much more powerful)
explosive ideology, in a self defeating attempt to assert a new Indian
nationalist identity/ vision – in the form of Hindu fascist RSS/BJP/VHD; which
threatens to blow India/ subcontinent (& the world) to smithereens…
…unless checked by the geo strategic framework outlined
earlier…
Correspondingly, the result of the psycho political
shockwave effect of Sept 11th2001 destruction of the World Trade
Centre….
Whatever the truth behind 9/11…
Wether it was simply `blowback’
&
the CIA have given their word that they had no assets in the region at the time
– presumably having lost interest in Pakistan after it became a nuclear power so Qs
of CIA/ ISI/ Taliban/ Al Qaeda connexions – including vis old CIA asset, one
Osama Bin Laden, do not arise
or a super GLADIO type plot/ or a Grand Strategy of Tension plot (as Alex Jones & the 9/11 Truth Movement, and ex German defense chief Andreas Von Bulow assert) - to secure control of the geo psycho political agenda for a war to establish such bases as would position them to protect the petrodollar from those less than happy with their end of the deal
…We can/ must begin anew from the
investigative & strategic foundation of understanding 9/11 & the
wars that follow in its wake, culminating in the Iran war…
…as the product of the conspiracy that gives itself away, the petrodollar (& petrodollar alliance); the source of ALL USA military plutocratic power established 28 (now 33) years previously…
…which propels directly & indirectly, every (military/ political/ economic) apocalyptic dynamic from the top to the bottom of the global political economy…
…&
how by addressing the threat from such, humanity can break free
from the apocalyptic control of the 10,000 year war/ finance nexus, to gain
conscious mastery of its own destiny
…was to actually (temporarily) stabilise
the USA speculative finance/ credit expansionary regime by enabling the `war on
terror’ to provide sufficient psycho political firebreaks on the pol/econ
agenda, that the scandals of the ENRON affair did not generate
their own irresistible dynamic & catalyse the crash of the entire system
(which given the enormous budget/ trade deficit – $7 Trillion & $700
Billion annualised respectively - was otherwise sufficiently ripe for)…
However, as USA imperial prestige demanded that for every
USA citizen killed in WTC attack, that many more brown people pay a higher
price in blood & treasure, bombing the mountains (& already heavily
bombed out) lands of Afghanistan was clearly insufficient. Only an attack on
Iraq could restore USA imperial credibility. Never mind Saddam Hussein’s
hostility to Al Qaeda (in contrast to claims they were allied), never mind that
the worst crimes (Iran/ Iraq war & Halabja massacre) that Saddam Hussein’s
regime committed were largely commissioned by USA/ its’ allies , & no one
had stood trial for such in the west. Or that the USA’s moral credibility as
owner of 10,000 nukes & policeman of WMD looks inadequate.
Imperial credibility was at stake. Was the
USA the world’s only superpower or not? & if so, it had to
put up. To do otherwise would have led the geo political piranha
to smell blood, so only by creating a quagmire in Iraq could the
situation be temporarily stabilised.
Of
course oil was the second of 3 factors ( the most sinister, USA Rapture psychology
we shall deal with later). But even this factor, its apparent thinly disguised
covert character had a reassuringly practical/ sane if not very legal/ moral
appearance to it – much more worrying being the character of the other 2
factors woven into this covertly overt factor…
Even
then, at the time I expected proxy forces to be used, as the USA was chased out
of Lebanon back in 1983 by a single truck bomber. The outcome appeared so
insanely predictable I doubted even George bush would commit to such an obvious
cataclysm…
So in conclusion, the epoch
of collapsing USA led global speculative finance/ credit expansionism, is
simply the final manifestation of automatic linear evolutionary development vis
(on basis of) the hegemony of matter/ finance over human consciousness/ global
civil society…
…but to understand what
is required of/ for humanity to avoid oblivion/ transcend the corresponding
apocalyptic epoch, we need to first understand (in greater depth) how the
decisive/ pivotal historic factor, our free will borders the
limits of automatic development (on basis of hegemony of matter/ finance over
human consciousness/ global civil society)…
…How, as a default
setting, we are:
Intelligent life, with the capacity
to become a deity (& visit the same crap on the next cosmic generation)…
…emerged out of pondscum, ultimately overpopulated the
natural economy, causing it to resort to settled agriculture which thence had
to be defended…
…which in turn impelled weapons
technology (especially metallurgy), complex forms of social pol/econ
organisation (social stratification) – the consequent enslavement of humanity
before the first great machine it had ever created, the war/ finance nexus…
The consequent (linear evolutionary/
automatic development of) hegemony of matter/ war/ finance nexus over human
consciousness/ (global) civil society…
…is most starkly reflected in
(Judeo Christian Islamic) Christian legend of `The Fall’…
(The
most noteworthy primordial manifestation of the subordination of consciousness
to matter) … that (as) even, especially the light bearer
(`Lucifer’) was cast out for rebelling against God (vis encouraging man to seek
independant knowledge of good & evil), that demonstrably humanity
cannot save itself by its own autonomous revolutionary
initiative, but must instead wait for external divine intervention… this legend
is the geo psycho political caldera of the entire
Judaeo – Christian – Islamic world. & it is in this geo psycho political
setting that the fate of all humanity will be decided more than anywhere else
in the context of the unfolding global pol/econ implosion of the war/
finance nexus.
.....
that in order to physically as well as intellectually preserve/ restore/ extend
light in both forms (electrical & intellectual), humanity must exploit the
chaos/ fear engendered by the final collapse of military plutocratic system to
push a rev geo pol/econ framework (which we outlined in `Battle of
Jerusalem') enabling it to gain hegemony over its own creation
(consciousness gaining hegemony over matter...) vis not only a culture of
common threats/ objectives confronting all humanity (especially in immediate
term, to develop sustainable energy sources - aided by civil society control of
finance/ its own creation - humanity no longer subordinate to the war/ finance
nexus) – but the overarching Universalist Conception – that (in the context of
the new global security architecture) the global pol/econ constitutional
framework must be geared towards enabling humanity to master its own time so
that it can understand/ master the unwritten universal constitution of
universal time per se....
The
very beginings of this new pol/econ culture are to be found in the hope
that comes from the beginnings of a viable strategy/ methodology to deal with
said apocalyptic threats - under pressure of said threats. Representing the
pivotal point in history, the precise point at which human consciousness
begins to assert its hegemony over matter/ finance/ its' own creation
(hence to name `Lucifer2.zip' - an aggressive refusal to submit
to our primordial original fear - expressed in the legend of `The fall', but to
exploit the chaos to seize command of our own destiny)…
....to break our own programming
& seize command of our own destiny (through the methods outlined in ` Battle of Jerusalem' in
`Lucifer2.zip'- refer back to as required)
…which defined
the hope of salvation in Christianity…
…emerging amidst the
despair of slaves, in an all powerful Roman empire & based on nothing but a
desperate hope in an afterlife & a willingness to die for such – so
impressing the Roman elite, that such percolated upwards until it had formal
power…
…so that even though
certainly subordinate to Roman power, the logic levers of the war/ finance
nexus, as Rome crumbled
Over whelmed by the frontiers tribes
stimulated to/ forced to band together in ever larger more effective formations
for defense (against the Roman empire) seeking plunder/ tribute
…the church based on a transcendent
vision, was still able to spread its infleuence in ways not open to imperial
legions alone (though often the 2 went hand in hand – including successor
figures like Charlemagne) – let alone the old tribal/ national Gods of Roman/
pre Roman times…
…thus this remnant of
Rome, provided the supranational basis/ framework for (post Roman) feudal
Europe…
The church serving as a
medium for the supranational transmission of education, culture, bureaucracy –
an aid to the fragmentation of power in Europe, between Kings, barons the
Church & increasingly finance; necessary to insure the process of capital
accummalation was not under the control of a single plundering Caesarist
entity…
…so that capital
accummalation could take place under more dynamic/ flexible circumstances…
While other states/ empires may have
been far more advanced, providing knowledge for Europe’s development, &
been better at war or finance, no state was better at combining
the 2 over an extended timeframe than Europe (aided by fragmentation of power –
enabled by the supranational framework of the Church/ Christian ideology)
…the centre of gravity
shifting from the Italianate cities to Conquistador Spain to mercantile Holland
& then finally mercantile England/ Britain. Protestantism increasingly
emerging as a national religion functioning as a lever enabling capital to
break from the power of the old feudal supranational catholic framework (yet without
being subject to the control of any caeasr because of the still continuing
fragmentation of power in Europe)…
…So that in this
shifting process finance ceased to serve the (feudal) sword, rather the (state)
sword increasingly served the interests of finance…
…a point reached
decisively at the beginning of the English civil war when Parliament refused
King Charles demand for war taxes unless it be given control of the army…
…hereonin, the
merchants being the decisive consolidating power in the land. As equality
as an end in itself be the most unstable/ unviable of all systems/
concepts leading to overturn, overturn, overturn, lacking the organic drive/
glue of the war finance nexus
as opposed to equality as a
means to an end to enable education to deal with common threats/
objectives confronting all humanity which as we have seen…..
which possessed the
power to break any power that sought to generally assault its interests…
…in turn increasingly
dependant on classical rationalism/ materialism (& which increasingly
ceased to require aid from movements based on Utopian visions) to flesh out its
interests (including as we have seen the threat of revolution)…
Ultimately, the single
mercantile superpower (England/ Britain) was prevented from being able to
develop caesarist ambitions by the European fragmentation of power, eg French
revanchist support for the American revolution – checking any possibility at
all of passing costs of falling rate of (British) mercantile profit onto
American colonists – being the classic example; awash with correspondingly
cheap capital, had by default no choice
but to find an outlet for that capital in
industrial investment (aided by profitable forced trade with the Indian
subcontinent – restricting domestic producers)…
…a process further
catalysed by (leading to longwave boom) by internal political repression
in the wake of the French revolution (France having bankrupted itself by
revanchist support for the American colonists – having been defeated by Britain
in the battle for control of colonies/ markets in the Seven Years War); whilst
simultaneously a modern industrial middle class/ skilled workforce provided a
prop of social differentiation/ stability against the new industrial
proletariat…
…this first
longwave econ boom of modern industrial capitalism, was dependant upon
repression rather than the institutionalisation of labor, in many respects
resembling in such fashion the last globally self destructive USA
led speculative finance/ credit expansionary based boom…
…a historical pointer
(as sunrise is to sunset) to the present final exhaustion of linear automatic
development based on the hegemony of matter/ finance over human consciousness/
global civil society…
…& the need
therefore, to break our programming for self destruction, through a new
transcendant vision, (the universalist conception that defines that the written secular
constitution must be calibrated to give people ever more control of their time,
to understand the unwritten universal constitution – gain mastery of God’s time
per se) calibrated (not to
an afterlife but) dealing with multiple apocalyptic dynamics/ threats, we shall
now outline further…
As we have seen, the 10,000 year old war/ finance nexus
has culminated in the conspiracy that gives itself away, the Petrodollar….
….growing out of the original Federal Reserve scam &
the quasi organic tendancy of the global reserve currency to over appreciate,
when the $ fell off the gold standard to maintain $ status as global reserve
currency & based on a deal brokered by Kissinger with the Saudis that all
oil be sold in $ in exchange for `protection’…
giving USA `an unlimited credit card’ enabling them to
finance USA trade/ budget deficit, & accumulated other liabilities (not to
mention the derivatives mountain) by simply printing $$$ - passing the costs of
their institutionalised hyper inflation onto the rest of the world - &
finance military machine costing more than the rest of the world’s put together
by the same printing press.
& as noted, whatever the truth behind 9/11…
Wether it was simply `blowback’
& the CIA have given their word that they had no assets in the region at the time – presumably having lost interest in Pakistan after it became a nuclear power so Qs of CIA/ ISI/ Taliban/ Al Qaeda connexions – including vis old CIA asset, one Osama Bin Laden, do not arise
or a super GLADIO type plot/ or
a Grand Strategy of Tension plot (as Alex Jones & the 9/11 Truth Movement,
and ex German defense chief Andreas Von Bulow assert) - to secure control of
the geo psycho political agenda for a war to establish such bases as would
position them to protect the petrodollar from those less than
happy with their end of the deal
…We can/ must begin
anew from the investigative & strategic foundation of understanding 9/11 &
the wars that follow in its wake, culminating in the Iran war…
…as the product of the conspiracy that gives itself away, the petrodollar (& petrodollar alliance); the source of ALL USA military plutocratic power established 28 (now 33) years previously…
9/11 is used as the pretext for seeking full spectrum dominance/ techno control, to prevent states (eg Iran) developing military or civil technology that could put them in a competition with the core metropole – eg sufficient to control their own oil, so that $ be eclipsed therefore USA insists on $ wars….
…& a
national/ global totalitarian machine enslaving billions is now posited as the
only way to prevent one man/ woman with a plan to attack critical
infrastructure – capable of generating a cascade effect (creeping or realtime)
into primal panic…
BUT, this
direct imposition of the hegemony/ interests of the first world
metropole over the 3rd world (analogous to the way the Roman empire dominated
the frontiers – stimulating the development of the very armed formations that
over-ran them) has a most curious effect; in that the very structures of
imperial control become the very agencies of imperial ruination…
…by those seeking a
piece of the pie &/ or to `hit back’ often simultaneously; through
insecurity/ instability of supply of key resources, hopelessly unsustainable
rates of immigration to the metropole along its own rapid transit systems –
…a series of asymmetric
processes, various forms of irregular warfare that use the weight of the
superpower/ metropole against itself, from the `reconquista’ of AZTLAN, to
refusing to use the $$$ for oil trades (as I indeed advocate actually dumping the $$$
to prevent USA running amok with the nukes vis the Iran war), both much more
strategically significant/ important than sporadic 9/11 type actions (wether or
not 9/11 was actually primarily attributable to old CIA asset Bin
Laden or wether it was as allowed to take place vis the NORAD standown or as
Alex Jones asserts, actually orchestrated & carried out by the USA military
plutocratic regime itself) …
Those that call/ think of the USA led military plutocratic elite as racist (leaving aside the laager of Rapture freakery) are wholly missing the point or at best, way out of date. For they don’t give a damn about anyone at all…
Hence they are willing to encourage apocalyptic migration into USA (this does not appear to be the case in Europe, where what is lacking is the necessary combo of a sufficiently hardline combined with development of common ownership of info & solar powered microgeneration with a WARTIME will to enable the decentralist development of especially Africa, whose fish stocks/ minerals etc we are plundering), in order (as well as for cheap labor) to attempt to divide & rule. This treason by Bush & co does not make this process any the less apocalyptically destabilising…
Eg an attempt to trap USA working/ middle class whites, caught on 2 fronts, attempting to defend borders and prone before their elites (eg in calling for tighter border control, said elites have instead of rapidly deporting them, opened up concentration camps for illegals – in which the very same border control activists who also have `quaint’ ideas about constitutional government can be subject to a last round up also)…
But, Alex Jones & co claim this is not all. A trans American highway is being planned, & the unification of Canada/ USA/ Mexico with the introduction of a new currency to replace the $$$, to be named the `Amero’ (basking in the reflected torpor of the `Euro’) – to follow (if Robert Pastor is to be believed) `a 9/11 type incident breaking the governmental inertial logjam’, providing a legitimising pretext for the introduction of such, on the grounds of expediency/ continuity.
This, it is hoped, will provide sufficient cover for the execution of such a policy, provide pretext/ cover for the Iran war to preserve continuity of the linkage between the global reserve fiat currency & oil being sold in such (post the crash of the $, under cover of a `terrorist incident’. Actually a grand strategy of tension incident).
Except of course. It is complete bollocks. It may well be attempted, but the Gods themselves fall out of the sky with cramp laughing at such folly.
For the chaos unleashed by the processes required to even attempt such a manoeuvre, indeed simply by process of such a process of the $ collapse, will plunge the world into primal panic/ anarchy – hence the repeated phrase in this work, `social revolution in security’ (eg a vigilantism needing stabilisation through vision & re-inforcement by common ownership of info & solar powered microgeneration) as the old leveraged security structures shall simply cease to be able to function except as a prop to the new.
& the iron law life, `know thyself’, is overlooked by such cabals, as is the iron law of history which determines that whenever a plutocratic cabal secures greater untrammelled control of the geo pol/con levers, its appetite/ greed increases by another order of magnitude.
To the extent (this time) of seeking to devour even the share of those (that have no sentimental, certainly not constitutional allegiance to such a super marginalised in power bunch of thieves), that occupy the key strategic chokepoints of this self styled `New World Order’. Visions of Dick Cheney dying in a shoot out with subordinates amidst the bullion vaults of Fort Knox, with a strangely fulfilled expression, spring to mind…
If this all came to pass however, it would leave us in Britain with something of a dilemma.
Do we in the British trial stick to our grand (new) constitutional narrative based on the 4 billion year mindset?
Or do we immerse ourselves in the investigative particulars of the Amero plot or such?
The former option is obviously preferable, but what (as I had predicted earlier) if the regime seeks its Iran war (& Amero switch) via a grand strategy of tension bombing in London (eg if they attempted such in USA very dangerous, as Bush is so well checked by both Alex Jones AND Pat Buchanan.& if they bombed Paris no one would care & if Canada no one would notice. This leaves only London)?
My resolve is still to focus on the grand constitutional narrative.
To leave the investigative particulars to the likes of Alex Jones & co & also other such in Britain & elsewhere.
My reasons
for this are that we must not conflate the constitutional with the
investigative, but must preserve at all costs a seperation
of powers.
As to do otherwise, is to put the new constitutional narrative on trial with every investigation. Meaning as the machinery of state is required to seek conviction at all costs to preserve its legitimacy/ itself, we replace one tyranny with another, which being even more unviable than an Amero plot, be even more inherently self aborting…
…that can best be described
as a global peasant war against a degenerate & bankrupt
metropole, by forces capable of overwhelming & breaking said metropole, but
not establishing a new viable geo pol/econ center of gravity…
For as well as vis technology, the message/ means
used organically to control the global peasantry vis modern media/market
forces, means the global peasantry now has a global reach/
impact, which has to be taken notice of…
…wheras before, at
both the progressive & reactionary levels, there were entire social
bulwarks/ classes acting as buffers between the imperial metropolitan core
& the great mass of global humanity…
…by (organically) appealing directly
to the global people (over the heads of their rulers progressive &
reactionary) the USA led imperial metropolitan core has become much more of a direct
target, has destroyed the old geo pol/econ buffers between (USA
led) metropolitan core & the 3rd world…
Eg the traditional parochial cultures/ bonds of the
metropole have been catastrophically destabilised/ balkanised by ever
increasing unrestrained waves of migration attracted by the
horrifically distorted geo pol/econ logic enabled in particular by the
petrodollar…
…without being replaced by any other over
arching culture capable of stabilising a balkanised patchwork…
…moreover it should be added, such a culture needs time
to take root within each superstate before from such, such can
(more) generally converge organically & practically at the level of a
stable space centric global melting pot…
For hitherto war is the natural condition of things,
out of the mists of time knowing no other way, too busy, scared or bored to
hitherto conceive of any other before the catalysing imperative honed into
view.
So we fight the global peasantry, so the global peasantry
must fight us, eg (also) through insecurity of supply.
Which lies at the heart of the petrodollar alliance.
It is incontestable that the USA petrodollar regime so
mistrusted the people’s of the mideast to accept worthless coupons/ $$$ for
their oil, that they needed to at the very least to use, if not (as Alex Jones
& co assert) to engineer Sept 11th, as a pretext to control the
oil (with a ring of USA bases from Central Asia through to Iraq) to prop up the
$$$ - via the petrodollar wars in the region. Either way the mideast peoples
are not happy with their side of the bargain….
But it is paradoxically precisely because
of this fact that we can dismiss the idea of Sept 11th asymmetric
warfare as being epidemic with USA defeat in the Iraq war.
As this will lead to the collapse of the
$$$ & descent into anarchy worldwide.
Hitherto it is highly likely that insofaras the Iraq war has infleuenced the development of any homegrown Jihadis, it would be for such to go to Iraq/ Afghanistan much more than plant bombs in Britain etc. Eg it used to be the refrain `go & live in Russia’, if you argued the case for socialism in Britain. & the riposte `go to Iraq’ would carry far more weight to it, eg both impugning the manhood & morals of anyone talking Jihad & NOT going to Iraq whilst they sought to legitimate the killing of civilians in Britain & elsewhere.
Which is why USA petrodollar regime is
seeking nuke war against Iran, to attempt to prop up the petrodollar at the
point of a nuclear sixshooter compelling China (as indeed I firmly advocated/
advocate) to dump the $$$ to prevent the USA running amok with the nukes…
Which so totally destroys the old military
plutocratic geo pol/econ (& secureaucratic) agendas, that the challenge
becomes simply to stabilise the necessary social revolution in security (to
prevent a collapse into anarchy)…
This
will entail recognising both the bankrupt military plutocratic
agenda AND the global peasant war for what they are, two parts of
the same self destruct programming of humanity…
& as the essence of the global
peasant war is the power to challenge/ even break the (USA led) metropolitcan
core without itself being able to consolidate a new/ alternative
geo pol/econ centre of gravity; the proliferation of WMD…
USA threatens China, China goes
nuclear, India responds likewise, Pakistan follows & trades spare parts to
fund its own program…
…must also be considered
part of the global peasant war
(moreover,
we have already seen how/ why China/ India cannot, as megastates, take over
from USA as imperial leaders of the military plutocratic system – so that
insofaras they are part of the metropolitan core, they are on basis of
war/ finance nexus, even more so part of the 3rd world)
Eg both because USA’s
attempts (aided by threat of its own 10,000 nukes) to deliberately retard
countries development (so as to prevent them even having the capacity to
develop their own WMD programs) feeds inexorably into (global) revanchist
sentiment AND because this consequent imbalance is an additional
factor meaning the geo pol/econ cost of WMD development is so great that such
become the innate focus of the state political psychology (of
course, for such not to be hindered, would mean the `effortless’
acquisition of WMD would both encourage others to commit themselves & lead
to general quantative & qualitative proliferation of WMD)…
…& were we not already heading
for such, this USA drive for `full spectrum dominance’ would be the primary
cause for global econ collapse…
Which brings us to the next factor,
the failure of the info revolution to either automatically enable
a post military plutocratic order, or prevent the collapse of the
military plutocratic system…
For inevitably the (character of
the) info revolution was shaped by the inevitable rise of global
finance beyond the control of any nation state…
…as a tool to assist this process…
& yet the
information revolution has made the old repressive military plutocratic state
(its machinery), ever increasingly unviable (as a means to retain control –
even briefly) – even as it grasps impotently for more power it withers away – without
automatically giving rise to a new post military plutocratic order…
Eg for while the info revolution was
self evidently integral to the breaking of the power of
(generally parochial) organised labor – it nevertheless armed to the teeth the
very sam people, as a potential global civil society…
Not so much as workers, still less
as consumers, but rather as thinking humans – held together by the culture of
the common threats/ objectives confronting all humanity – the chief objective
being to gain control of our own time, to not only master all threats to our
survival but universal time itself…
…through establishing common ownership of info in
exchange for the oil remaining on long enough to effect transition to solar
powered microgeneration – breaking the deathgrip of the energy/ finance barons
& their secureaucratic agendas by giving the corresponding substantive
sovereignty of the individual strategic depth to control their state &
econ, especially their currencies…
Meyer Rothschild:
`Give me control of a nations’ currency & I care not who writes its’ laws’
…of necessity underpinned by new global security
architecture outlined as well as division between secular written constitution
& unwritten universal constitution,
The former designed to secure for humanity control of its
time to comprehend the latter, gyrostabilised by pursuit of mastery of God’s
creation in order to avoid being destroyed by our own creation…
…as the precondition to consolidate these preconditions
for establishing/ consolidating control of the currency by civil society.
Without which only chaos can reign & oblivion ensue…
This compares starkly
with the only other remotely similar process in history, the crisis of slavery:
The crisis of slavery
encompassing USA/ Russia/ India/ China
(& representing the break up of the ancient world under the impact
of the British industrial political economy) illustrates decisively the hitherto
geo historical constraints/
lack of options available to states (& radical forces), to break free from
the organic control of the 10,000 year old war/ finance nexus, if they wanted
to - & in so doing, decisively illuminates the character of
the one time opportunity we have to seize our destiny & gain mastery over
ourselves…
…paradoxically
propelled/ enabled by aforementioned multi faceted MAD threats to enable the
threats to be balanced of against each other like bricks in an arch – providing
the context for the new geo pol/econ constitutional framework & held
together by the overarching cultural vision of the Universalist Conception…
Eg until
maximum development of & final exhaustion of capacity for development on
basis of the war/ finance nexus, it was impossible to base society on the
universalist conception…
The division between written secular
constitution & unwritten universalist cosmological constitution, the former
designed to enable humanity to gain mastery of the latter by enabling it to
gain mastery of its own time to secure mastery of God’s time/ creation to avoid
being destroyed by its own creation…
& therefore…
as humanity has/ had not mastery of
its own time, ipso facto, matter (humanity’s own creation, the war/ finance
nexus) had mastery over human consciousness
...defacto subordinate
to war/ finance nexus, in latent form if only in the form of decisively
unbridled ego….
As in the post
Roman era (aided by the fragmentation of power vis the church) Europe
increasingly found its true geo cultural boundaries, its true form (vis war/
finance nexus)…
This in turn created
opportunities for emergence of & spread of Islamic empire…
…Eg power in the
Islamic world was based less than in Europe on a central kingly power holding
the balance of power between different baronial factions & corresponding
foreign magnates – (the unreliability of desert agriculture did not much lend
itself to such) providing framework for emergence of finance over the sword…
…than a more visionary
pooling of social – economic risk & therefore an emphasis on central
accumalation/ funding of acumalation of knowledge to help alleviate that social & economic risk &
corresponding cultural developments…
…which of course found
expression in ideological/ geo cultural mores/ literary manifestations of such…
The Koran was the cultural/
programmatic genesis of such a process that fed the European enlightenment/
decisively accelerating its intellectual/ corresponding material development in
concert with its demonstrably more resilient & flexible war/ finance nexus
(to the point that said process could become self sustaining/ propelled in the
emergent mercantile/ industrial world)
Still
subordinate to hegemony of matter over consciousness (as then as yet, no
terrifying accumalation of military geo pol/econ apocalyptic threats/
capabilities & therefore positive technological corollaries, to enable
universalist conception etc)
Hence a
tendancy as wealth accumalated, to split into conflicting poles of attraction….
The Abisaids deposing the
Ummayads as caliphs (& shifting the capital to Baghdad – to consolidate
power); & the Ummayads moving west, to the Iberian peninsula, driving out
the Visigoths to establish the nominally subordinate sub Caliphate (nominally
loyal to Baghdad); of Al Andaluscia until the Berber fundamentalists decalred
themselves rival caliphs forcing Al Andaluscia to either go out of its way to
subordinate itself to one or other claiment to the caliphate; or alternatively
declare openly what they were defacto; a caliphate in their own right…
This however changed
the geo political psycho dynamics completely …
…the bold assertion of
contra authority having a number of effects…
Firstly, in
setting a precedent (vis usurpation of legitimising authority), making
it psycho politically possible for coups to be launched to control Cordoba (capital
of Al Andaluscia) – destabilising & ultimately fragmenting the caliphate into 23 city states – following a curiously European
pattern of internal geo political fragmentation……
Secondly (because
of Al Andalus particular geo political position on borders of Christendom &
Islamic world…) in ideologising the region as the principle pole of the
Muslim world antagonising the Christians of Al Andaluscia – helping fuel
conflict later on…
The caliphate
fragmented when one of the pretenders called in Berber fundamentalists to help
fight their claim…
…leading over the
longer term to fragmentation of Al Andaluscia (decline of Cordoba as the
capital 100 years after pronouncement as caliphate)
Q WHY did
the lack of central unity better serve Euro Christian model than the Islamic
model???
Because such
fragmentation of power produced such an emphasis/ premium on the military/
warlordist, as to so corrode the very (cultural/ developmental) strength of the
Islamic empire (in Al Andalus) that gave it broader appeal. Meaning it was less
well able over time than before to dynamically absorb/ retain new allies/
converts from which Christendom - & therefore lost the geo psychological
initiative & became prone to the dynamics of supra (ethno religious)
national war (between Christendom & Islam) – from a force which had learnt
sufficiently from the Islamic empire to not be seen (at least for long enough
to maintain decisive momentum) as such total savages, that they lost/ failed to
gain the geo psychological initiative…
…& once underway,
this process bcame increasingly irreversible…
Furthermore, as increasing
wealth led to decisive fracturing of the Islamic world, the effect of Islamic
(fanatic) warlordism was to exacerbate this fragmentary tendancy…
Wheras the European model
war/ finance nexus was, as already noted, actually aided in terms of
aforementioned geo pol/econ development/ flexibility by its
fragmentary dynamic
Eg Spain (Castile/ Aragon
etc) ultimately in becoming defined by as expansionist supranational catholic
universalist identity…
…vis gold/ silver from the
colonies, which enabled it to hold together (albeit at ruinous expense in blood
& treasure) an empire in Europe – whilst simultaneously acting as the
conduit for capital accumalation/ mercantile development in the rest of Europe
(again at Spain’s own expense)
This flexibility of
development contrasts with the Islamic empire’s successor’s, the Ottoman
empire, which paradoxically was undone by its unity (denying it
such organic/ developmental flexibility – yet largely imperative, emerging as
it did from the need to pool economic risk in a centralised state as determined
by the logic of pol/econ geography – over much of the area of the Ottoman empire)…
the
(post 1492) rise of the western war/ finance nexus led eventually to the
progressive bottling up/ eclipse of the Islamic empire (its centre shifting
from west to east vis the Ottomans)…
…in
a way curiously analogous to the way the decline of military plutocratic system
(vis USA empire) led to collapse of the USSR; manifest in increasing/
progressive tendancy to ideological/ intellectual stagnation…
…Spain sought &
sucked in wealth from the `new world’ to strengthen Spanish control of the increasingly
corrupt church – fuelling national (German) demands for a `cheap church’ (&
more freedom), the birth of a Protestant ideology which in turn became
the rallying cry of merchants seeking leverage away from despotic control –
finding its decisive expression in the English revolution.
From the beginning
therefore, colonial expansion by European states was bound up with an
internecine struggle for survival between European states to avoid such
loss of strength as would see them submerged by others – hence competitive
expansion in the new world – which in turn gave rise to an independent
expansionist logic.
Hence growing out of
the soil of Europe, (the struggle for) independence &/ or freedom at home,
meant subjegation/ slavery for other peoples abroad…
This raises the Q:
Why was
it possible for conquistadors to be able to use indigenous peoples as slaves,
but the (largely British) USA settlers wiped out the Native Americans &
imported black slaves at great expense???
In the initial period
of colonisation, the extent of South American civilisation was its comparative
undoing…
…eg the more backward
(compared with later colonists) conquistadors…
able to conquer the settled
populations by combo of factors. Firstly the superiority of Spanish steel
weapons to those made of obsidian (firearms were more used for display
violence/ psychological effect – which brings us to) secondly, the desperation
of Spanish colonists to make good/ gain their fortune; such therefore insured
the colonists attained a weapons grade bastardy by psycho pol/econ natural
selection. Which stood them in good stead to take the military psychological
initiative with settled peoples – who in turn were not motivated by patriotism,
but rather local patriotism, meaning such could also be persuaded upon to join
the Spanish in their battles for local geo pol reasons…
…required help/ active
co-operation not merely to learn the terrain, but to locate/ exploit the very metallic basis upon which
their empire was (at least) initially principally established…
Correspondingly (in terms of both
their dependency on the native people as well as Euro Church ideology), the
process of cultural legitimation (vis Visigoth Spain) demanded
christianisation of (at least some of) the survivors (obviously as the humanitarian
objections to the slaughter/ slavery had little practical pol/econ weight in
terms of strengthening Spains’ position, they fell by default).
Eg & as a process
of geo pol/econ natural selection brought the backward colonies
to the richest pickings in terms of gold & later economiendas (the right to
levy taxes over a defined area) first…
…it follows that after
this came the absorption of land/ other commodities – by those seeking a base
of independence from Catholicism especially from England, to which they sought
a base for – in order to re-export their revolutionary ideas/
ideology…
So a number of factors
determined slavery or annihilation:
Pre-existing
development of people – enabling rapid theft of portable wealth – which made
more suitable to a relatively backward colonial project – eg Spanish
conquistaodors.
& the specific all
encompassing ideology of the church demanded souls for the consecration of
Spain etc
Wheras the more
developed English etc had little need for such, as more inclined
to seek to carve out a new world (initially inspired by freedom from catholic
domination, but gathering its own independent geo pol/econ expansionist
dynamic/ momentum) – so that paradoxically their pursuit of freedom meant they
had no use for the (in any case less readily exploitable/ controllable)
inhabitants (that the Spanish passed over), leading by one means & another
(war/ bio warfare, deliberate & incidental destruction of economic foundations,
systematic & relentless deracination leading to psychic collapse) to a
thoroughgoing process of war & destabilization amounting in effect to
genocide.
Hence the importing of
slaves into the southern plantations (vis cotton/ sugar etc)…
& the paradoxical
ideological/ cultural geo pol/econ faultlines that sprang up around this issue…
As Britain supported their colonies for strategic reasons (& to a
certain extent prestige as an end in itself), that correspondingly firmly
established same (including their expansionist dynamics), such felt secure
enough in their position to seek ever greater freedom from crown control – such
that whence attempts made to even begin to pass costs of falling
rate of profit onto the colonists AND control their inexorable
expansionist drives into native American territory (out of a blend of desire
for strategic control/ prevent them becoming too strong and humanitarian
concern)…
…The colonists rebelled – backed by
the French – driven by revanchist prestige – that if they did not, no one would
ever take them seriously again, which would be strategically fatal to their own
psychology & (correspondingly) what others could expect to get away with in
relation to them…
Initially held together
during war of independence by a fudge over `state’s rights’, between slave
& free state (dead native Americans notwithstanding)…
Black slavery was both
a reassurance of the status of whites & a threat to their
liberty vis competition with such (driving down wages etc)…
…added to this the
southern states were closer to Britain (to whom they exported `king cotton’)
favoring cheap free trade imports – wheras the industrial north favored tarrifs
to nurture their industries…
The unfolding crisis of
slavery in USA was precipitated by attempts to expand slavery into northern
freestates…
A process catalysed by
the Mexican war & corresponding compromise to avoid secessionist splits)
dividing new states between free & slaveholding, southerners became both
more defensive about attempts to deny them access to some new territories
whilst simultaneously confident of slavery’s defacto
consolidation – eg that formally recognised that be here to stay,
which prior to the fudge they were less self assured about…
…therefore looked like weakness from
hostile authorities
(prior to this it was America’s
vastness that slowed down the showdown until the geo political squares on the chessboard filled up with
enough hostile forces/ interests to generate its own psycho political momentum)
The low level civil war
fought out between anti slavery activists (eg John Brown et al) & pro
slavery forces drilling the political institutional & geo psychology of the
2 camps (& their interests) to the point of all out open conflict vis
southern seccession – supported by British cotton interests – in effect a
bashful form of colonialism…
…Correspondingly,
this part of the crisis of slavery was resolved through consolidation of the
union against those forces that in one form & another constituted a threat
to the stability of the interests of northern capitalism (& its’ laborist
adjunct)
…which both
the destabilising attempts to extend slavery (eg in Kansas) a process that flowed inexorably from the
institution of slavery itself, necessitating its abolition, &
(vis the `40 acres & a mule’ demand) the notion of racial equality which
destabilised the gradient of social stratification & therefore military
plutocracy itself; yet without the geo cultural conditions
enabling the stabilisation of economic equality. Therefore social/ econ &
political (& internal/ external imperial) power `found its’ own level’ in
the post reconstruction era…
By comparison with this
seismic event, the campaign against slavery in British colonies in late 18th
– early/ mid 19th centuaries
was aimed against increasingly marginal reactionary planter interests, was a
key adjunct in the cultural psychology of British political reform – to allow
for representation of complex interests – that such represented a bulwark
against…
Eg without weakening/
removing the position of such, they would be a (not least a psychological)
deadweight against the new pol/econ interests/ constituencies in the new
middle/ working classes
Russia was defined by fear of the
Mongol horde (& also as custodian of worldview/ orthodox Christianity)…
This in turn, meant
Russia had to be so big, which correspondingly meant
unlike European states, it had no clear (defacto) conception of
fragmentation of power between states…
…& this
therefore, produced a more insular perspective as external enemies
were less of an everyday threat than in Europe – which (correspondingly)
threatened internal civil war to capture the throne…
Therefore
the only way to resolve this was (materially)
through an expansionist autocracy – with (ideologically) the tsar seen as God’s
direct intercessionary on earth (worldview orthodoxy functioning as this
ideological mechanism/ support)
Which in turn
stabilised the position of landlords over their serfs; in conjunction with the oppression
of space decisively diluting the potential for urban development/
markets/ guilds for skilled tradesmen/ merchants to join – which over time
would have challenged the power of military feudal landlords/ become a power in
its own right…
As (pre Alex II), the
comparative historic gravity of the urban centres was thence so weak that there
could be no patriotic middle class (as in the English/ American/ French
Revolutions) positioned over time to take/ consolidate power/ reconfigurate the
state…
…& wheras the
French revolution/ sub caesarist Bonaparte forced modernisation upon European
states (led by the old elites in alliance with their middle classes as a survival
imperative), the reaction to Bonaparte’s invasion of Russia, was simply to burn
the capital, withdraw into the vastness of the territory & wait for winter/
the grand armee to starve & cut them to pieces on the retreat…
& as
power in essence lay with the landlords, it only lay with the
tsar in terms of feudal expansionism (to keep landlordism together)…
…therefore Pugatchev
was snatching at a phantom…
…as was the Decembrist
rising, which sought a constitutional division of power – without the material
basis to consolidate/ bring such about…
With expanding Russian empire
positioned as the `gendarme of Europe’ post the 1848 revolutions, to act as a
psychological chilling threat/ bulwark against further such, was
correspondingly brought into conflict with the deeper geo
political/ security interests of Britain/ France as well as Turkey, leading to
the Crimean war (to bottle Russia up) – which (so) revealed (to the tsarist
central authorities – the successor Alex II) the inadequacy of Russian military
economic technical infrastructure…
Therefore
(marginal external cultural influences on the elite notwhitstanding) serious
attempts at change were (only really) stimulated by the Crimean war, which
threatened (vis British expansionism) the fundamental
integrity of the inertial expansionist Russian state…
…Eg competition in
Central Asia…
Which forced
the Russians not merely to open a window on the world (in the spirit of Peter/ Catherine the Great), but actually
attempt something resembling fundamental internal restructuring…
Tsar Alex II’s attempt
to hothouse the development of a modern Russian bourgeois, by trying to push
through the liberation of the serfs(agricultural capitalism to provide funds
for industrial investment), tended by
& large to both undermine the feudal economy AND
create popular & unrealisable expectations of radical reform (much of what
was being attempted was frustrated by the landlordist class); which fuelled (in
many respects an incendiary) discontent among students/ intelligentsia…
What partially
stabilised this process was that once this geo strategic / pol/econ process had
begun (assassination of tsar alex II & repression of radicals notwithstanding), given the wider
(western) geo pol/econ imperatives could not be stopped…
Especially vis the
French defeat in Franco Prussian war, France’s desire for revenge & a
partner on Germany’s eastern flank…
…the Russian need for a
warm water port in Constantinople/ Istanbul…
Competition for
territory vis the decomposing Austro Hungarian empire & related issues of
national prestige/ credibility.
But, as the
(aforementioned) Russian narrative (required to hold the country together, of
orthodox autocracy) would have been undermined by the sort of pol/econ
pluralism that a viable Russian capitalism would have required
(which is why it was no more than a geo strategic pol/econ
compact between the west & Russian autocracy/ landlordism)…
…Largely foreign owned/
stimulated Russian capitalism (lacking at the time the clear &
proximite threat of communism on the border to encourage development of
the sort of reformist internal/ external geo pol/econ & social coalition to
enable it to secure itself by a stable social gradient), therefore
got squeezed between the political illegitimacy of landlordism & the
emergent working class
Which in the context of
the aforementioned political legitimacy crisis of 1917, functioned as the
battering ram of a new cultural/ political caste/ bureaucracy able to eclipse/
replace the old Russian narrative (of world orthodoxy) with the new cultural
narratives of world socialist Revolution…
…such be the way the
crisis of slavery resolved itself in Russia (gulags notwithstanding)…
India
Considering that the
greatest superpower in all history, the contempory USA, cannot with all the forces
at its disposal, control 3 Sunni held provinces in Iraq totalling 4 million
Sunni Arabs…
…a Q arises
HOW the hell did
Britain end up controlling the geo pol/econ directly/ indirectly of megastates
(possessing artillery & cavalry) India & China (leading to the failed
Indian rebellion of 1857 & the failed Taipeng rebellion of 1850-61) with
barely 100,000 troops & an advanced navy controlling the destiny of
hundreds of millions from thousands of miles away???
Well, in both cases,
the very size & (particular forms of) cultural sophistication
of both states actually played against them/ made them possible to take over/
manipulate…
WHY did
India not have the kind of fragmentation of power/ feudal
warlordism that would have caused it to suck in the whole world
to enable it to finance its internal wars, WHY did
the Indians lack this vision???
Wheras the organic
geo pol/econ internal/ external fragmentation of power in Europe is control
over land, created the longterm basis for the church (as a supranational
ideological/ political arbiter) to further aid this process of power
fragmentation (providing supranational ideological framework – giving rise to
the later demands for a cheap church) in the post Roman era…
Organic communal
control of land in India
(eg unpredictable monsoon culture
meant land revenue main lever of econ control in caste based system - as no
magnate would wish to expose himself to singular ruination if said monsoon
failed)
…meant correspondingly,
as the power of religion was too closely allied to central power (in indian
state/ empires) for it to have sufficient leverage to play this
role to a critical/ sufficient degree…
it either could not
spread very far – as an extra territorial framework/ structure, or
this in turn meant that as the ideology was not sufficiently independent from
control of its imperial patrons, a corresponding demand for a
`cheap church’ (or cheap Islam/ Hinduism etc) could not provide a sufficient
geo strategic framework (alliance)/ rallying cry to provide (eventual) cover
for merchants (in alliance with state then as overlords of such) to break out
as an independent power…
(British of course aided
by lack of continental engagement)
…India therefore
naturally polytheistic…
& for (Euro
Christian type) feudalism to work as outlined, it needs to be reasonably well ideologically
(vis church framework) & geographically secure in its foundations over a
fairly wide area to allow it to function effectively in terms of fragmentation
of power…
Eg in India parts may
appear (more) suited to a feudal type of system, but as its general
culture (subject historically to invaders from across the mountainous
northwest) is inclined to military feudalism
Eg the unpredictable
monsoon culture meant land revenue main lever of econ control in communal land
caste based system - as no magnate would wish to expose himself to singular
ruination if said monsoon failed
…upon which, such
empires historically sweep across the whole country leaving such a corresponding
cultural/ ideological social language as to prevent a feudal/
Christian type framework (capable of combining the type of internal/ external
fragmentation of power capable of giving rise to a capitalist system) taking
root – so that lacking such geo strategic depth (such as Spain
had in reversing the expansion of the Islamic empire); such scarcely able to
factor as potential geo cultural pol/econ frameworks…
Allied to this, empires
within India tended over time to naturally overstretch to the point that to
finance the increasing costs of machinery required to sustain
them, they would have to levy such high taxes, that they become internally
weakened/ subject to resulting fragmentation…
…in a sense, India was
a gigantic empire/ imperial enterprise waiting to happen – as when the Mughals
became dependant on the silver stream (indirectly from the new world) via
France/ Britain to finance their military state machine…
…providing the colonial
powers with a foothold – such that as the empire became still weaker/ more
atrophied, (correspondingly) superior military technique (&
organising/ financing of such) of the French/ british powers (honed in fighting
each other) by default sucked them into championing one proxy or
another to advance their interests, until (with French defeated/ bankrupted)
British were the main power
& this correlates to the
idea that the internal geo pol/econ dynamic geo pol/econ agenda resulting from
India’s size was paradoxically the chief factor that played against it…
…creating an insular
geo psychology, an insular fragmentation of power
…that contrasted dramatically with Europe, that increasingly sought to suck in the whole world into enabling/ financing its nations to kill each other ever more efficiently – in struggle for survival; producing an evolving war/ finance nexus of optimised efficiency
Whereby
the great crumbling internal Mughal empire appears still
as the greater threat to/ target of smaller states – sufficient to
allow the new rising empire to continue to acquire power – so that the geo
psychological dynamic becomes one of resignation, enabling (British)
consolidation of power – before a sufficient degree of unity
could overcome such, by which time it was too late…
Paradoxically
the best example of this can be seen in the 1857 rebellion of the remnants of
the old order…
Whereby
the corresponding organic fragmentation of the resistence…
…&
its defeat, was paradoxically the precondition for the emergence of a modern all
Indian nationalism, that however still could not
immediately drive out the British Raj; precisely because the character of its
internal divisions was such, that as soon as it made any serious attempt to
bring sufficient force to bear, it tended to disintegrate into communal strife
– leaving the British above the fray – indeed possessed of a kind of
paradoxical imperial legitimacy…
THIS
tendancy for the sword to shatter into communal fragments as soon as made
contact, is why Indian nationalism had to follow a specifically non violent
model (an antecedant for the
contempory Revolutionary model of a diminishing calculus of force…), so
as to render imperial control increasingly non profitable/ contributing to
exhaustion of British imperial machine & allowing an all Indian national
identity to be cultivated…
…whilst
simultaneously keeping to an irreducible minimum communal strife – by relying
principally upon the power of inertia
…Gandhi
seeking to make a virtue/ forge a concept of national legitimacy out
of an operational necessity…
Though
so perilously thin was this veneer of urban elite orchestrated inter communal
unity, covering the hellish depths of landlordist/ feudal communal insularity
(with Gandhi as tuning fork in chief), that as the british position became
manifestly progressively weaker (especially throughout the 1930’s), Muslims
firstly looked to British (paradoxical) imperial legitimacy to provide security
gaurentees & then ultimately/ irresistibly to the establishment of Pakistan
in areas where they had a contiguous majority…
The
principle factors that allowed the rest of India to hold together
at all as an independent entity after the British exhausted by 2
world wars…
…was
the combo of this fragile inertial concept of national political
legitimacy, most strikingly evinced in the hunger strike of Gandhi as a counter
to the post independence anti Muslim riots (following partition) & his
subsequent assassination by Hindu fascist RSS; which actually sealed the political
legitimacy/ secular identity of the Indian state – albeit dependant on the
second factor…
…That
the cold war threatened superpower engagement in any seccession. This so raised
the price of seccession, that no decisive consensus could be found to prosecute
such – enabling India via a 3rd world nationalist
ideology/ socialist fuedalist framework…
that combined 3rd world nationalist ideology,
workers’ interests with those of feudal landlords…
to
hold together by sheer inertia
The
apogee of socialist feudalism (of the Nehru dynasty) was Indira Gandhi’s (post
1966 devaluation) increasingly radical pol/econ program of nationalisations –
attempted land reform, which ultimately foundered against the fact that the
people in charge of such were themselves landed interests…
…&
reaction against authoritarian approach used to try to push such through…
This in turn led to the pro market approach from desai…
Then post Indira Gandhi’s assassination…
Eg the authoritarian centre fuelling secessionist tendancies
– eg Akali Dal in Punjab to the extent that Sanjay Gandhi reduced to sponsoring
Bhindranwalia in an attempt to split
the regional opposition – which backfired/ ultimately led to the showdown at
the golden temple in 1984 (& Indira Gandhi’s assassination)
…Rajiv Gandhi became PM & adopted a market centred approach
Which proved sufficiently unpopular
to lose (1989) to a left split from Congress led by VP Singh allied with other
leftist/ regionalist parties & curiously, the fascist BJP (& RSS/ VHP),
whose leader LK Advani (against the backdrop of Hindu fascist/ landlordist/
middle cclass opposition to VP Singh’s attempt to sponsor legislation
consolidating position among Dalits etc) saw the opportunity to
legitimate from within govt the destruction of the Barbary Mosque at Ayodhya,
& correspondingly seize command of the geo cultural agenda in India for
Hindu fascism, becoming the rallying standard among India’s rising
middle class.
This
leaves us with the Q, WHY did Indira Gandhi’s policy fail???
We
know contempory Indian capitalism growing beyond a certain point is seen as the
enemy in a megastate context by its own people…
…So WHY
did Indira Gandhi’s (semi authoritarian) 3rd world radicalism appear
as violating `freedom’???
Eg how
the hell do you account for a geo cultural concept of freedom that
inexorably leads the way to the fascist BJP – which (if
unchecked) will blow India to smithereens???
You can
discern amidst the insanity a kind of logic, whereby, India having gone through
the traumas resulting from its geo pol/econ insularity, from periodic
invasions, from the Aryans, to the Mughals to finally the British, through the
struggle to break free from the last, struggles to define its own concept/
understanding of freedom, whereby its populous are ever more engaged in
expressing themselves in relation to the rest of the world…
…&
rather than tolerate another despotic raj however ostensibly enlightened, they
would rather freely choose to set out on the path to oblivion, so
that finally on the edge of perdition, as an animated globally connected civil
society, they can learn as a people what does not work, as the first
precondition to becoming aware of what can work, & what their role is - as
future leaders of the human race – defined by the universalist conception
The way this plays out is that the Manmohan Singh govt
must ultimately fall; eg after fear of BJP, the only thing that preserves
attention of Communist Party of India members is going on the offenseive to the
extent of undermining capitalist hegemony…
…forcing a contra reaction/ war as a
diversion & implosion
But (as with China) the
aforementioned petrodollar crash cuts across this, though, as noted, India needs
a transcendent vision eclipsing its internal apocalyptic parochialisms –
enabling India to hold together…
& while we have as
outlined before how development of the new global security architecture
requires that after Israel gives back the last of the 1967 lands, that Pakistan
gets rid of its nukes & assumes command of the global commonwealth
confederation (Pakistan is dynamically marked by the threat of Hindu fascism if
it does not)…
…both marginalizing
Hindu fascism & providing Pakistan with cover/ protection (from the
emergent oil superstate) as it negotiates re-unification with India –
especially vis the rebuilding of the Barbary mosque at Ayodhya – so that India
can monitor USA nukes, checking USA apocalyptic expansionism in order to free
USA visionary expansionism – including for solar power desalination &
universalist conception – giving/ stabilizing India with a global role/
universal vision…
The key Q is WHY would
Pakistan agree to re-unify with India NOW & not BEFORE???
Pakistan HAD to secede
before, otherwise would have been prone before Hindu pogroms & ended up
splitting under even more adverse circumstances…
…but NOW re-unification
is possible ONLY because it is imperative, to stabilize not merely Inida (to
enable India to play its global role) but the world; & this held together
(also) by universalist conception (transcending India’s apocalyptic
parochialisms) is what stabilizes India…
China
China differed from European
fragmentation of power in a number of key respects.
Wheras Europe was
defined by natural ethno national linguistic/ racial borders – defining states
most of which had access to the sea – helping to consolidate
these borders & with them the European fragmentation of power between &
(more or less) within states…
…the lack of
such (correspondingly consolidatable) ethno political borders in
China meant that to swallow another few thousand sqKm of territory was not
enough to rout your enemy/ consolidate power (in china), - which in turn made
the borders (& correspondingly geo pol/econ psychology) between regional
magnates even more unreliable – so that only by capturing/ unifying the whole
of China – traditionally by securing the `Mandate of Heaven’ with the support of a peasant army
& consolidating this position through extensive public works projects that
could only be undertaken by general mobilisation of the Chinese state (pre-emptively
weakeing the position of any warlords), could order be established/
consolidated…
This characterised
China by virtue of its size as an imperial & therefore insular megastate
from ancient times…
…lacking Europe’s
expansionist drive, because thank you very much, it was quite big enough as it
was & had to focus most of its energies upon internal development/ holding
itself together in the face of regional faultlines/ social tension, rather than
the expansionist colonial conquests which European states had to
undertake in competition with each other to try & prevent themselves
falling too far behind – which in turn contributed to internal fragmentation of
power (of a rising merchant class) as an aid to innovation/ pluralistic
strength; particularly/ specifically in Britain- which when their
last illusory hope to pass on costs of falling rate of profit onto American
colonists curtailed by American Revolution, had no choice but to seek an outlet
(for its cheap capital) through industrial development…
Hence the power of the
centralising Chinese state, its strength was also its weakness & WHY
China had such a massive head start on the rest of humanity (so far ahead of it
until the 19th centuary) instead of dominating the world like this
preposterous little island – indeed lacking the strategic imperatives
to do so (quite the reverse); got periodically swallowed up by regional/ social
tensions/ decadence (loss of `heavenly mandate’) & corresponding cycles of
renewal (new heavenly mandate/ emperor)
This logic, the need to
maintain internal geo pol/econ equilibrium can best be demonstrated vis the way
that prior to the Mongol invasion, a tendancy to drift to the south left the
country prone before the invader…
…which impact of, even
after Mongols decline/ retreat
(Because while it was
possible to conquer China on horseback, to adopt the means to administer it/ avoid
losing power, so tied up Mongols own
fighting capacity that their position so weakened; forced to retreat)
…so affected China’s
geo historic memory, that China’s central geo pol/econ pre-occupation was the
maintenance of sufficient internal equilibrium to fill up its spaces for
reasons of security; which meant that the Chinese state had to keep the power
of the merchants in check/ adopt a more insular geo pol/econ framework, simply
to stop itself falling prey to Central Asian threats (Mongols/ tartars/
Russians)
& this
rendered insurmountable the paradox of its development, that increases in
wealth/ productivity, merely fed through in increases in population – rather
than a shift to concentrations of capital inclined/ compelled to industrial
revolution…
…by interstate
competition compelling such for sake of national survival, quite the opposite,
Chinese national survival pointed away from such an
approach…
Indeed China victims of
their own superiority, as increased production led to population increases
– which led to a dead end absorbing increased productivity…
range of anti
catalytic factors:
Proportionate weakness of merchants
Lack of interstate competition generating a symbiotic
premium on strategic innovations with state policy
Insular geo psychology/ geo imperatives
The vast panoply of anti catalytic options for solving bottlenecks without
radical innovation (against therefore not generating
symbiotic innovations with state policy)
This circuitous (defining
closed) loop of development defined China until the opium wars…
…the primary cause of
which was Britain’s negative balance of payments with china, which could only
be reversed through the sale of opium (triangular trade with
India/ china/ Britain), which over an extended timeframe (mid
1820’s – mid 1830’s) actually led to a silver shortage in China…
As to the Q how on
earth was it that the manchus managed to lose the opium war/ failed to bring
adequate forces to bear???
The Chinese became
paradoxically victims of their own superiority…
…as the British
haemmoraghed silver in exchange for Chinese goods, the only way to redress the
trade deficit was through the opium trade…
…this was radically
different/ more difficult to long term penetration of Mughal empire via the
silver stream creating culture of dependency & thus securing
a position enabling British displacement of Mughals
China was more monolithic
& the British had no prior points of penetration; excepting
the right to purchase Chinese goods…
However British able to
exploit tensions between southern traders (to gain a foothold) & the
central power (the northern originated manchus)…
…by the time the
central power had adequately woken up, as internal divisions as to how
to respond (eg wether to grow the stuff themselves to redress the silver drain)
divided them still further…
Instructive as to their paralysis was that they
felt it necessary to first prepare the ground by going after the Chinese opium
traders to set the context for a later showdown with the British
Furthermore China’s
(imperial) weight/ strength paradoxically played against it, was organically
employed to undermine it, that it correspondingly (both) needed to & could
not develop the industrial technologies vis military specialisms (to
defeat the British)
This would have
required the kind of social pol/econ configuration that we have seen China
could not accommodate to hold itself together historically as this would
require so much power to be given to the merchant class, creating such
imbalances as to render china unviable therefore China left prone…
& that without
such, internal order raised itself as the greatest factor
Hence the critical
point is that the british had in the preceeding period accumulated enough strength
to so re-inforce their position/ penetration that the weakness of the
central power came into play
& consequently
hereonin, the superiority of British arms was a key factor…
Therefore
peasant wars eg Taipeng rebellion arising out of indirect (or direct)
consequance (eg economic fallout from the silver shortage), also could
not bring China’s internal forces/ reserves to bear…
Q WHY did previous
emperors NOT rely so heavily on the gentry to defeat peasant
insurgencies???
Because such
represented a weakening/ evolving dissolution of the central power…
(&) to re-iterate
what made the Taipeng unviable, was the very processes that gave rise to them…
Eg:
The silver shortage &:
The inability of the Manchu to stop the silver drain – as previous
modalities of keeping China together
mitigated against the kind of industrial revolution necessary
to modernise China’s antique military machine…
Therefore
a frontal assault by the Taipeng (on the British) unviable
Therefore
Manchu could (as proxy/ comprador forces – anxious to keep the
country together – albeit prone before the unequal treaties –
with colonial powers), lean on the gentry – to hold the centre in immediate
term – at cost of fatally weakening the centre over the longer term…
The continuing
inability to fend of encroachment of imperial powers in turn led to a systemic
exhaustion of historical options leading up to the 1949 takeover…
Beginning with policy
of `self strengthening’ which with the grafting of military/ corresponding
heavy industrial technology (dependant increasingly on the gentry for
funds – further weakening the central power & shifting power towards the
regions) onto the old Chinese state…
Correspondingly a quai mystic
movement, the Boxer rising targeted foreign infleuences was initially
restrained by the Manchus, then allowed to burn itself out to avoid it turning
on the Manchu state – its’ failure further (indeed definitively) underscoring
the inability of peasant rebellions to renew the state in the old way
…had the inexorable
tendancy of providing the powerbase of a military poltical cadre led by Sun Yat Sen, seeking to further
accelerate industrialisation of China, which as such led to further strengthening
of power of the gentry, to provide funds for industrialisation – which could only
be undertaken on a regional (as opposed to an all China) basis, led to a
peculiar break up of China into regional warlordisms, yet with
fairly impressive industrial development, rather than disintegratory chaos…
Eg as the old
antique Chinese state was defined more by previous fear of chaos from central
Asia/ corresponding need to maintain internal equillirium than the new wave of
colonialism, its break up while a massive & intolerable blow to China’s
sense of itself, did not decisively hinder development
(an oblique comparison
can be drawn between the original rise of China as a result of
its’ earlier break up leading to rival warlordisms/ techno innovation – which
beyond a certain point, China’s geographic insularity/ the lack of such ongoing
rivalry sucking in the whole world to make its’ internecine strife more
efficient …
…resolved itself in
re-unification & definition against barbarian threats to its west…)…
Q WHAT does this tell us
about the apparent paraxdoxical conflict between China’s national narrative &
its process of industrial development???
That the antique
Chinese state, having been effectively broken up by colonial
incursion, could not modernise itself by itself, in a unified way…
& that therefore,
it correspondingly became prone before any passing notion that fed the delusion
that it could…
Hence, prone before
Britain/ German/ Japan/ America etc, Chinese nationalists instinctively wanted
to use the Soviet Union to break free/ enable modernisation of
their country…
But, this meant the
nationalist structures/ frameworks/ infrastrucure that the USSR helped set up
became absolutely packed decisively with USSR agents at the highest levels…
This was a trade…
USSR assistance to
build structures that Chinese nationalism had proven by itself it could not
possibly develop, in exchange for USSR being able to hitch a ride in covert
(as opposed to overt takeover of the Eastern bloc post WWII, OR of openly
communist parties) form on the back of Chinese nationalism…
When the open CCP
formations/ allied fractions took a hammering in 1927, the Chinese nationalists
under Chiang kai Sheik looked to have got the better end of the deal…
But
wheras other states balance between other powers to preserve/ strengthen or
defend their centre, it is of key significance Chinese dependant on USSR to
even enable establishment of a unificatory centre…
Correspondingly &
bearing in mind the CCP by Mao’s admission concentrated against the backdrop of
the Japanese invasion, 70% on trying to secure control of territory, 20% on
fighting the nationalists & only 10% on fighting the Japanese (which would
give further credence to Hang & Halliday’s assertion it was a lot less than
10%)…
…the basis of the 1949
takeover was:
Post WWII exhaustion of the old colonial powers, including
reluctance of USA (after Japan) to in any way get dragged into an Asian land
war – which colored their policy vis China.
The deep penetration of nationalist forces with CCP/ USSR agents
A (corresponding to the nebulous agreement with USA reached vis war with
Japan & correspondingly vague notion of USSR’s right of intervention into
China) massive Russian invasion allowing the then rather ropey CCP army formations
to regroup in Manchuria
Combo of systematic corruption in nationalist regime with the feeding of
their armies to the CCP by aforementioned CCP/USSR operatives within said
nationalist forces; bringing about a catastrophic collapse in morale of nationalist
forces, a process which fed of itself – leading to 1949 takeover
& as Chiang Kai
Sheik would have been dependant on colonial aid as vis USSR;
there was no such viable animal as Chinese nationalism, excepting the
bizarre terror of Mao, which created a 3rd world nationalist crust/
megastate ideology allowing capitalism to develop on an all China
basis…
So because nobody could
impose what they really wanted (& the culture was too geo
politically/ internally crumbly for a negotiated compromise), everybody
got what nobody wanted…
The nationalists/ bourgeois/ gentry (we have seen) were too weak to
impose what they wanted – as in hock to the USSR.
The colonialists could not impose what they wanted (lacking in strength/ exhausted).
The peasantry could not even define what it wanted
The Russians could commit decisively to effect a change in govt, but
could not really impose what they wanted…
& wheras with every
other exotic political figure (Lenin, DeGaulle, not to mention Hitler or Petain)
that appeared to come from nowhere; there was at least a clear
political market for them, so therefore, chart the reasons for the success of
the market (that led to their advance) & symbiotic evolution) of their
fraction, & the rest pretty much follows from there…
…but mao?
Where was
the political market for such a figure that refused even to obey Stalin???
Not only that, unlike
the first 4, Mao had to trade his wares before anyone
was willing to buy such…
So the Q is, WHY did the political
market in China not function properly???
Mao’s victory is
connected to how the Taipeng lost…
Eg the inherent
inflexibility of ancient all Chinese pol/econ
Eg the heavenly
mandate only applies within the boundaries of the ancient
geo pol/econ modality (which we thought originally, had been resurrected
by colonial weakness/ USSR connexion – on a modified basis)
Therefore
a peasant war could NOT have brought a radical/ reformist govt to
power, as it would have collapsed back into warlordism – without
being subordinate to geo pol connexions to USSR…
Eg peasant war within
Chinese megastate too big to be subordinate, leds back into capitalism
& back into warlordistm &
therefore inherently abortive
Therefore
essentially a battle of colonialisms, in which the CCP prevailed (thanks to
border with USSR)…
WHAT was
the difference between India & China???
(As noted) British
imperial legitimacy In India was defined by default (Indian Communalism)
therefore (as noted), Indian nationalist legitimacy had to define itself in
this context against it (a la Gandhi) in such fashion as
avoided communal strife/ (or at any rate) kept it from destroying
everything…
Well, while China’s
internal pol/econ agenda was defined by colonialism, it had no
such imperial legitimacy to brace itself against to
define a peaceful anti imperial legitimacy (& as noted the traditional form
of renewalist insurgency/ `mandate of heaven’ to renew/ restore the old Chinese
state rendered unviable by colonialism…
Correspondingly, in
this setting, political natural selection determined it was less important to
actually prepare a movement capable of seizing power in its own right, than to
corral/ secure control of even a disintegrating political core, with the intention
of so directing it to catch the (eg post WWII Russian) wave capable of
propelling it to power…
The singular defining
characteristic of the regime (vis 1949 takeover) was a kind of creative
destruction…
…The economic, cultural &
above all geo psychological destruction of the old political economic ways, vis
the subordination of the economy to the goal of the `suprpower program’, to
both blackmail USSR into giving it the requisite technology (thence dragging it
into war over Taiwan) & paying for such with super exploitation of the
peasantry…
…the attempt to accelerate
such in defiance of econ physiological reality/ (immediate) potentiality
through the `great Leap forward’, ending (aided by Vietnam war enabling
recapturing of agenda by Mao) with the `Cultural revolution’…
…a general
mobilisation (from above by Mao) of sections of civil society against the party
& indeed itself…
…which both
exhausted the residual potential to retain control through terror alone…
(hence also rapproachment
with USA – even though this was inevitably aimed as being another
alternative source of weapons
technology)
& yet, so seared that
terror into the mindset of China, that it has post Mao, increasingly enabled
capitalism to develop within a socialist infrastructural/ 3rd world
national liberationist ideological framework…
Indeed the effectiveness of
this logic is best illustrated by the Tianenmen
Square massacre in 1989 in which 4000 students massacred…
Originally a protest
vis corruption vis the collapse of the 2 price system (as result of the rising
power of the capitalist sector eclipsing the socialised sector), against the effect
(if not explicitly against) expanding capitalism eclipsing the `iron rice bowl’
& supported by bourgeois seeking more freedom/ room for manoeuvre…
It was necessary for
the CCP to restore order for capitalism, to enable its continuing
development under the ideological cover of the 3rd world nationalist
conception – in turn econ growth (based on USA trade deficit) providing
sufficient basis to stabilise regime over an extended timeframe…
Q But WHY is capitalism
able to rule in its own name in India (even though in so doing, it will blow
the state to smithereens) but not at all in China???
It is the very
fractured aspect of India itself (its tendancy to blow itself to kingdom come)
that enabled Britain to gain a foothold/ colonise India/ retain
control via imperial legitimacy (threat of fragmentation)…
…which in turn
functioned as a brace enabling anti colonial legitimacy to define
itself against such initially on basis of socialist feudalism; eg inertia held
India together (eg no decisive constituency could commit to secede for fear of
prohibitive costs vis superpower engagement) – but post cold war capitalist
development encouraged, but has led to expansion of both radical forces
increasingly seeing their own megastate elite as the main threat: and classical
fascist forces – propelling the country to war as a military plutocratic
apocalyptic diversion/ means to retain control of the pol/econ agenda even if
for only as long as it takes to so blow the subcontinent to smithereens…
As noted it is
(aided by the USSR) only the CCP’s restoration of/ attainment of the `mandate
of heaven’ (vis 3rd world national liberationist ideology) which has
stabilized Chinese capitalism; and in so doing restored the capacity of the old
`renewalist’ insurgent model to once again manifest itself…
(when formerly it could not do so, because
the imperialist breeches in China’s ancient insular pol/econ, as noted,
rendered such abortive – hence the reliance on the gentry pushed the country in
the direction of capitalism & warlordism)
Yet while the old
insular `renewalist’ model is capable of withdrawing the `mandate of heaven’;
Eg both because rise of Chinese
capitalism beyond a certain point posits it as the principle/ most visible
enemy of its’ own people – see the anti Japan riots as proof of this generally
unstable tendancy AND the aforementioned petrodollar crash…
It is self evidently
impossible for insular renewalism to establish a new `mandate of heaven’…
Indeed as already
noted, the only way a new `mandate of heaven’ can be established is…
…on the basis of global
constitutional division between written secular constitution/ unwritten
universal constitution; & defining geo cultural priority of the first, as
being to enable all humanity to have enough time to comprehend the second…
…& this requires
both a (transitional) nuclear shotgun wedding between CCP (at one & the
same time delegitimised by the fallout from the petrodollar crash &
partially relegitimised by same crash) and Chinese civil society…
…the very focus of
which must be the aforementioned Jerusalem centred framework as outlined in
Chapters 1-4…
AND a connexion to
global civil society beginning with aforementioned Jerusalem centred global
security architecture framework & consolidated vis Europe’s peacekeeping
operations in South Africa – to prevent slaughter of the white minority – which
decisively compels the re-engineering of Euro/ global constitution/
institutions; to enable global reconstruction especially vis solar powered
desalination…
…For the mandate of heaven of
the new global commonwealth confederation, is to be found in its commitment to
developing Planet Africa…
…including also as our global
insurance policy (vis threat of a mini ice age – vis flooding of gulf stream
warm water currents with glacial freshwater turning them off), in turn dependant
on solar powered decentralist development…
Based
on the basic social econ unit as a freestanding unit – access to energy, water
& info giving it strategic depth, consequently also able to pool
sovereignty & therefore see of all security threats from predatory
warlords/ magnates that have no mandate from the pooled sovereignty of wider
humanity
Precisely
it be only via such that especially impenetrable Africa could be
in any way (however destructively) be opened up – as only such had the levers
(of war/ finance) to do so – the sheer impenetrable vastness of Africa in
particular overwhelming humanity’s attempts to master the territory. territory.
Hence
any attempt to copy the conventional model of development must
fail – even any significant wealth generation develops such internal migration
across wide & porous borders (increasingly a problem for the west –
ironically prior to its geo pol/econ crash) as to overwhelm same.
Unless,
development based much more (though not exclusively) on the freestanding social
econ unit (energy/ water/ info), so that there is both not
principally any boomtown locale to flood into, AND people know
they will be made use of/ be able to develop.
Thus
the balance of power will come to lie not in New York, London or even Jerusalem.
But in the hands of the sovereign individual.
& as a model which the whole
world must adopt as a framework of development (eg India’s jugular the glacial
River Ganges threatened with extinction – therefore solar powered desalination
necessary as both a fallback and to enable development without
destroying the Ganges – similar for China with its insane policy (as at
27/7/05) to build 600 new coal fired powerstations & Europe/ USA itself.
…through which we develop the
techniques/ mindset that befit us to join the rest of the universe/ become God
& visit the same crap on the next cosmic generation….
The idea of asking the Q was 1949 actually (a
revolution) an authentic peasant war, simply never occurred to me
to ask…
Eg vis a country historically obsessed with the
heavenly mandate (& corresponding peasant wars in pre colonial times), the
cautious/ conservative interpretation was that post WWII, as the colonial
powers weakened, china simply reverted
to type with a modified ideological crust that however defined the regime as
less insular than before, even if this
was merely expressed in a stream of coarse ideological invective to confer on
itself historic/ political/ narrative legitimacy…
(as can be seen in Vol I Chapter 7 & Vol II
Chapter 2 of `Substance Over Form’)
…& as to the Q then how on earth
does my entire work not collapse into ashes, I can only erspond, that as can
see throughout this work, that the evolution of this work is defined/ led principally
by the anomalies that have to be addressed to get this work (the operational
gameplan) just about good enough to serve as the starting point from which
humanity can begin to get on top of the unflding apocalyptic geo pol/con chaos…
That as it was only when the operational gameplan
could comprehend China, that we could address ourselves to the global
peasant war & contrast it with the earlier crisis of slavery,
that I then (had &) could meaningfully deal with this Q & its
implications in more depth…
…time being at a premium, & the priority always
being to remain sufficiently flexible in approach to be able to anticipate/
spot/ respond to the decisive flaw/ anomaly, that will compel the next
paradigm/ re-engineering of my work…
…so that it can/ will be just about good enough to
serve as the starting point for humanity to get on top of the aforementioned
chaos…
The Global Peasant
War (part 2)
To recap/ conclude:
The global peasant war has global reach/ capacity to
over-run the metropole, yet no capacity to establish a new centre
of gravity; is born of a special kind of historically aggregated apocalyptic
despair, it does not believe in the first world having any real regard for the
3rd world.
The global peasant war therefore be a formidable multi
faceted manifestation of seeking redress directly or redress in other
revanchist forms…
So, the singular Q that confronts us be:
WHAT will buy just enough time for all
humanity to allow the diminishing calculus of force to hold
hostile parties apart for barely long enough to allow the Revolution settlement
to kick in???
Eg as even an understanding of capitalist longwave cycles
or even the 10,000 year old war/ finance nexus will not explain why
man should ever have faith in man ever again…
…for this, we need a in depth appreciation of how we
found ourselves in this mess in the first place, of the 4 billion year old
origins of:
6 The Paradoxes of the Human Soul
The
operational & theoretical core of our work is the seperation between
the secular written constitution & (the purpose of which is to help us to
comprehend) the unwritten universal constitution.
Yet,
we can only definitively prove the existence of a supreme being by
establishing said framework (constitutional division) - & yet we need
said supreme being as a supra reserve of courage to enable humanity to
establish said framework…
This
is a paradox that lies not merely at the heart of our work; but at the heart of
all humanity, & has done in essence since the beginning of time…
....The foundation of
the paradoxes of the human soul is that consciousness emerged out of dust.
We sought/ seek to understand ourselves,
our world our creator & the first great (series) event is that we are enslaved by the first really
great machine of our own creation, the war/ finance nexus....
Beyond a certain point, the land
(`natural economy') could not support a rising population.
Thence it becomes necessary both
to resort (beyond an episodic/ incipient level) to settled agriculture (to feed
rising population); and also (to defend both the natural
resources of the land & its husbanded agricultural base which necessitated)
the development (beyond
an episodic/ incipient level) of
a war economy, war technology (increasingly metallurgy), which further
drove economic & technological development....
An emergent war/
finance nexus (increasing
circulation of means of exchange, especially gold/ silver, acceptable across
incipient state boundaries between allies & adversaries alike) breaking up the earlier protohistoric
economy (which tends very much to be under-rated in it's technical
sophistication) as it dictated the social pol/econ agenda internally (within
each emerging proto state construct) and externally by setting
the agenda for patterns of trade & military pol/econ alliances....
....(&) we have seen that the end
result (of evolution of the war/ finance nexus) is the core paradox:
....that the USA led military plutocratic elite
depend on the Revolution to seize power (from the war/ finance nexus/ machine
they are the gilded slaves of), to save their (everyone's) children: & that
the Revolution (to avoid global annihilation) is dependant on this factor &
must tailor its entire military pol/econ framework accordingly....
....(but) before & now is the Great
Existential Paradox:
....that charity begins at home AND
charity begins with preventing the (nuclear) annihilation of humanity, (that) both concepts clash AND
yet ultimately depend on each other.....
...Which primal angst at guilt of
which, also feeds into the fear/ philosophy of hell; which stood in for
the (then historically unripe) core paradox as a cypher. And the
philosophy of hell
derivative
of fears of the Great Existential Paradox, that such is unresolvable UNTIL
the (historically ripened) Core Paradox enables their general
resolution; that we are responsible for the guilt accruing from either
our sins against society or family, & as we cannot serve both we will face
hideous consequences either way. Especially as without the
(historically ripened) Core Paradox, we cannot help but sin against humanity
anyway, as our poor Bolshevik ancestors discovered.
.... is organically
hijacked by incipient elites in order (as a precondition) to retain control....
....So the Great Existential Paradox
actually functions organically as a weapon of choice for the war/
finance nexus, at least until eclipsed by the core paradox,
enabling the worst most tortuous features of the Great Existential paradox to
be institutionally overcome....
Now the 2 dimensional
(anthropomorphic) God concept, the idea that `man was created in God's image'
(certainly common to Judaeo/ Christian/ Islamic traditions & logical default
undercurrent in others)....
....clashes with (& undermines)
understanding of existential dialectics (& paradoxes of the human soul)
which are based on the fact that human soul was not
created (fully formed) by a deity but emerged out of dust....
The Mind of God
As
to the Q `if there is a God why is there so much suffering in the world? And
HOW can you claim as you do, that vis Christianity/ Islam etc, there WAS
(& IS) a manifestation of a God
dialectic, yet SUBORDINATE to the hegemony of matter over consciousness? HOW
can God allow itself to be arsed about in this unholy fashion?'
Consciousness
springs forth from (cosmic) dust (not even shit), & through an accretion of
knowledge, a super criticality is attained (aided by supra reserve of courage -
vis the new rev theory & its deployment), enabling through
humanity’s multidimensional sacrifice/ re-inforcement- (as the sun gives
life to the earth – though different, in that humanity must consciously
choose life, by drawing on the supra reserve to enable)
the hegemony of consciousness over matter to arise & humanity to
(ultimately) become God.
But
you cannot point to as direct conclusive proof of God's existence the wonder
`miracle' of nature in say, a leaf or tree (nature - eg the oft phrase
`...isn't life miraculous? A God MUST have made it.'). For such an
approach leads down the road of projecting a vision of an ALL controlling
deity, every action/ event etc the product of an enslaved/ enslaving fatalism -
rather than ultimate control of process, through aiding (via supra reserve of
courage) human consciousness/ knowledge to attain (through exercise of FREE
WILL) hegemony over matter - as an independent FREE entity/ agency (rather than
the sordid plaything of a celestial Saddam Hussein).
Creation
(the act of) was a work of art NOT of science.
Scientific
knowledge/ consciousness grows out of it as an independent agency,
drawing on the supra reserve of courage to enable it to attain hegemony over
matter. And so thence become God, replicating the process. Art
thence remains WITHIN this consciousness, the ultimate flowering (via
scientific knowledge) of art.
....& this (anthropomorphic God)
concept has a symbiotic relationship with the Great Existential Paradox, in
that the philosophy of hell (the aforementioned cypher for the historically
unripe Core Paradox & derivative of fears from the Great Existential
Paradox) is ripe for priestification. & if you (appear to) control
the gates of heaven & hell, you have default political
control; eg until the core paradox historically ripens.
UNTIL then, free will/
consciousness is subordinate to hegemony of matter over consciousness (war/ finance nexus over civil society).
The
most noteworthy primordial manifestation (of this subordination of
consciousness to matter) being the legend of the `The Fall’… that (as) even, especially
the light bearer (`Lucifer’) was cast out for rebelling against God (vis
encouraging man to seek independant knowledge of good & evil), that demonstrably
humanity cannot save itself by its own autonomous
revolutionary initiative, but must instead wait for external divine
intervention… this legend is the geo psycho political caldera of
the entire Judaeo – Christian – Islamic world. & (as noted
throughout S.O.F.; but especially Vol III) it is in this geo psycho political
setting that the fate of all humanity will be decided more than anywhere else
in the context of the unfolding global pol/econ implosion of the war/
finance nexus.
..... that in order
to physically as well as intellectually preserve/ restore/ extend light in both
forms (electrical & intellectual), humanity must exploit the chaos/ fear
engendered by the final collapse of military plutocratic system to push a rev
geo pol/econ framework (which we outlined in `Communique Number 1' in
`Lucifer2.zip'- refer back to as required, or wait until we include text of
said communique shortly) enabling it to gain hegemony over its own
creation (consciousness gaining hegemony over matter...) vis culture of common
threats/ objectives confronting all humanity (especially in immediate term, to
develop sustainable energy sources - aided by civil society control of finance/
its own creation - humanity no longer subordinate to the war/ finance
nexus)....
The very beginings
of this new pol/econ culture are to be found in the hope that
comes from the beginnings of a viable strategy/ methodolgy to deal with said
apocalyptic threats - under pressure of said threats. Representing the pivotal
point in history, the precise point at which human consciousness begins
to assert its hegemony over matter/ finance/ its' own creation (hence
to name `Lucifer2.zip' - an aggressive refusal to submit to our
primordial original fear - expressed in the legend of `The fall', but to
exploit the chaos to seize command of our own destiny (we examine the strategic
role of the cultural co-option of Christian/ Islamic/ Jewish etc imagery in
Chapter 2 of `Intro to Quantum Materialism' - contained in `Lucifer2.zip').
....to break our
own programming & seize command of our own destiny (through the methods outlined in `Communique
Number 1' in `Lucifer2.zip'- refer back to as required)
B Towards the Grand Unified
Theory/ Process (2)
(To start with the basics) Vis free
will & its limitations, we can discount as self evidantly wrong the popular
(scientific) notion of a universe `for every possible outcome (of every
event)'...
Eg (routine examples given) that
Hitler won WWII or Napoleon won before him (which impossible `possibilities' - we have already disposed
of by explaining how/ why these unstable inherently hyper-inflationary
plundering wannabee Caesarisms could not consolidate viable centres of geo
pol/econ gravity under any eventuality whatever).
For aside from the historic limits
of free will already outlined (that only when war/ finance nexus/
hegemony of matter over consciousness no longer able to reform itself in
response to a radical shock - is free will a decisive historic
factor) it is not only (according to this logic) the major events
that require a universe (of their very own for each possible outcome); but
every possible outcome of every decision however trivial (eg wether I scratch
my balls with my left hand or my right, wether or not I scratch my arse instead
& for how long/ what minute of what hour & again or not at any given
moment of any given day - & the same for everyone indeed every living
organism of every species on every planet, from the beginning of time - don't
even get me started on the Q of which random sperm fertilises which random egg
to produce which random being.... & the knock on effects).
Free will therefore has its
limitations. It only becomes a decisive historic factor under
certain conditions.... eg (vis immediate pre revolution) when war/ finance nexus
(military plutocratic machine) no longer able to reform itself (in response to
a radical shock) - as already outlined - whence the core paradox ripens.
But also when capacity exists (eg
from 1950's onwards) to destroy the world, the officers of the war/ finance
nexus, have to not summon up decisive impulse to trigger all out
oblivion (prioritise their children instead).
This in essence is free will's negative
manifestation. A useful phenonemon (yet) still entirely consistent with
hegemony of matter over consciousness....
Aside from this, the phenonemon of
free will is particular not general. Eg a West African coca slave can use their
ingenuity to become a slaveholder instead. But possesses no levers to overthrow
the entire geo pol/econ (military plutocratic) system of which this slavery
(via neo colonial cash crop dependancy) is but a very small cog.
Inequality/ tyranny can be passed of
onto others, but as seen (noted as an organic process) the hegemony of matter
over consciousness will always maintain itself for as long as
political economic inertia benefits a decisive minority of humanity....
....only when
instability becomes (so) general does free will cease being (pro-actively)
particular & instead becomes (pro-actively) general...
& it is as a result of this
fragmented free will producing fragmentation of consciousness
that produces (the) existential paradoxes (of the human soul) we have already
examined....
Q Are
free will & consciousness one & the same thing?
This implies they are (that it is)
latent within all matter (which is certainly no more than
entirely consistent with everything else) right down to the smallest subatomic
particle...
....& yet (as already seen), it
is constraints on free will (including death, as we shall
see later) that impose patterns of order, that enable
free will to develop/ ripen/ amount to a hegemonic factor...
...eg without such,
humanity (the potential of intelligent life) would destroy/ abort itself (its
potential) before it ripened....
(eg if cavemen had nuclear weapons).
There is (must be therefore) a
universal framework that means we are constrained from knowing any given thing before
we are ready to (at least begin to) absorb the consequances of that
knowledge....
(random
external threats like asteroid strikes etc notwithstanding - the point is that
on some planets free will/ intelligent life can develop/ gain
hegemony over matter)
....at least at a general level....
Death forces intelligent life to
project itself, its ideas far beyond itself.... to value its soul, its
learning/ knowledge beyond its existing corporeal form....
Death prevents matter running amok,
maintaining (the) incipient (especially supra) universal hegemony
of consciousness over matter....
....paradoxically therefore, it is
precisely in death that is to be found our hope & gaurentor against absolute
universal horror....
By embracing death
therefore, to resist the threat of global annihilation, we invoke
this hope....
and yet.... while death/ martyrdom
serves as a vehicle for such before & after (the sacrifice) the event, the
event itself (the point of transition & especially familial shockwaves) is
so sordid it renders a neccessary conceit, all hopes
super-imposed over it even as it (helps) realise such....
How can this be so???
Because while it is (obviously) the
negation of life, most brutally for those close to; in a structurally
insane world hurtling towards destruction, it is (clearly) the only way to
resist the ultimate madness/ oblivion.... of everything, all humanity/ it's
soul....
Indeed ALL death per se (as well as rev
sacrifice) is a neccessary conceit because it represents the
(transient? I know not...) destruction of a living manifestation
of free will in order to enable (the) fruition of free will per se.
All
is passd on through knowledge anyway, upon which others in turn build... in this
is to be found the expression of free will- consciousness (albeit circumscribed
by said material- historical boundaries) which enables successor generations,
including our successors to build... we are all the progeny of God, yet all the
progeny of humanity....
But why is death a
conceit, creation so imperfect???
What is the role of
this neccessary imperfection???
Why does humanity(?)
&/ or God(?) need for creation to be imperfect???
Because without
imperfection, intelligent life/ new cosmic generation (new god) would have no
independance, would in effect merely be the same deity (spiritual
masturbation)...
Therefore, if God needs a soulmate
(of whatever description) or just simply to create for its own sake, this is
the only way...
This still does not answer the Q, how
did this all begin, vis first cosmic generation (eg `where did the first god
come from?'). & I (still) surmise we will only get the answer when we both
need it & are ready to absorb its consequances...
...& quite probably the answer
as to why creation was created is bound up to the answer to this
Q....
....which in turn is almost
certainly bound up with (can only be discovered by) development of a culture developing (beyond
even culture of common threats/ objectives confronting all humanity/ human
survival) beyond terror, beyond individual planetary parochialism.... the
beginnings of the process of intelligent life becoming God.
But to illustrate the boundaries of
what can immediately be deduced from what we can gather (so far), we can take
things a litte further before we come up against what (I think) are
(immediately, that is temporary) insurmountable barriers (wether just this side of the
Revolution, or progress made further down the line on basis of common threats/
objectives confronting all humanity or, less likely, until we are ready to
begin said process of intelligent life becoming God)....
C Time, Consciousness & Free
will
Furthermore,
as intelligent life (which emerged out of dust as an independant
entity) can gain mastery over itself (with the aid of the supra
reserve of courage of God), become God…
…intelligent
life, while currently subject to the (material) constraints
of Universal Time, can (as an intermediate deeptime objective) gain control of universal
time per se (vis consciousness gaining hegemony over universe per
se)...
...so that (correspondingly) not
just consciousness & free will; but time, consciousness & free
will are one & the same – from the standpoint of BOTH creator &
created....
So the `struggle for an economy of
time' posited by Marx (yes, yes I know...); is the longstanding essence of
struggle of consciousness to gain hegemony over matter....
....it is as much part of the
universal(ist) constitution as the fragmentation of power is. Indeed the 2
symbiotically re-enforce / enable each other (& indeed are one & the
same)...
From this, we can extrapolate that control
of time is the pivot upon which all hinges.
At the most basic (planetary) level,
to enable humanity to gain the knowledge neccessary to confront common threats/
objectives (confronting all humanity), humanity must gain control of its own
creation (make finance
work for civil society - instead of remain slaves of the first great machine
humanity ever made, the war/ finance nexus, which would mean oblivion...)
...but beyond this... beyond
parochial planetary concerns, as it is neccessary to connect with other
planetary civilisations to deal with threats too vast to confront at the (mere)
planetary level, the (drive for) acquisition of knowledge as an end in itself,
must (as noted) transcend even the culture of the common threats to humanity's
existence; as a precondition to enable humanity to deal with such threats...
...human consciousness (all
intelligent life) therefore, must finally resolve our violent relationship with
God by becoming not just masters of our own creation - of time in this context
- but masters of God's creation, of universal time itself....
This implies (as a first major step)
a fusion of natural science with a `parascience' (enabling for example thought
projection across planets)
If the present condition of such
(parasciences) inspire zero or (at best) near zero confidence, remember the
universal (constitutional) principle that we can only begin to acquire any part
of knowledge when we are ready to at least begin to absorb the consequances of
that knowledge. So it is hardly surprising that we cannot (yet) remove the
safety locks on this or other tools, when we are still making such arses of
ourselves with the primitive nukes.
But remember, God's creation/
universal constitution automatically prevents universal horror, eg `devils'
emerging (this is the function of death - which prevents matter/ any
emergent living entity running amok on a universal scale/ beyond the limits of
plantery destruction). Hitler etc was no `devil', not even a lord of
death, but just a dogsbody of death, glorified playground bullies - indeed the
threats we face now, of oblivion, are no graver than that required to stimulate
humanity (if it so exercises its' free will) to establish constitutional
control of its own creation - rather than remain as slaves of the war/ finance
nexus (leading to oblivion)....
The paradox then is that humanity is
dependant on God, to enable it to master itself, & yet, the constitution
must be secular.
Q. How
to resolve?
The written secular
constitution is aimed at civil society control of our own time/
creation (rather than remain slaves of the war/ finance nexus) in order to
comprehend:
The unwritten universal
constitution which is as outlined, indispensible for enabling humanity
to execute the written secular constitution (eg drawing on the supra reserve of
courage)...
Wheras the written secular
constitution is purely/ simply about enabling free will (humanity to acquire
time/ space to think/ confront common threats/ objectives - instead of remain slaves of war/ finance nexus),
removing such constraints that generally abort it...
...the unwritten universal
constitution, can only be mastered by free will per se (eg as noted Time,
Consciousness & Free Will are one & the same - that God's creation of
time, was the supreme act of free will)...
...Therefore to introduce any aspect
of compulsion therefore, whatsoever (to even the tiniest degree) is not to
extend/ develop humanity's control/ ownership/ takeover of the unwritten
constitution, it is merely to bang one's head against its' childproof locks...
D Conscious Gravity & Time -
Space
So in order to gain/ stabilise
control of our own creation, we must gain mastery of God's…
For we can see that creation is a
kind of program which requires (the) freewill that
emerges from within it to gain hegemony over process & program, for it to
actually be successful (intelligent life gain mastery of itself).
It also contains for us a guide
principle that (with the collapse of the war/ finance nexus centre of geo
pol/econ gravity) all (societal/ developmental) decisions must be taken on
basis of whatever on balance best serves freewill...
To re-iterate God's creation/
universal constitution automatically prevents universal horror, eg `devils'
emerging (this is the function of death - which prevents matter/ any emergent
living entity running amok on a universal scale/ beyond the limits of planetry
destruction).
...not just at the individual level,
but at the level of any state/ corp entity, where its' own material existence
takes precedence over all other people(s)/ latent potential for (general)
development - especially on the basis of primacy of knowledge accumalation (eg
vis common threats/ objectives confronting all humanity)...
This `supra death'....
-
which we have seen played out in partial form over the previous capitalist
longwave cycles; & which now (there is no potential for reform/
reconfiguration of the war/ finance nexus, as no single military plutocratic
state is strong enough to lead this process by itself...) has reached the
terminal stage...
....can best be termed conscious
gravity.
As just as there is a maximum height
for any mountain on any planet....
...before it collapses generally then
absolutely under its own gravity (as with the Himalayas - vis the Tibetan
Plateau), or conversely (as with smaller planet Mars - with its
dead, cold, exhausted core - producing volcanic mountain Olympus Mons -
3 times the size of Everest), all further growth is curtailed by the fact that
an exhausted internal pressure cannot push further out in
defiance of its' own gravity...
....So there is a maximum Himalayan
height for the speculative plunder of the military plutocratic state/ system
....
....its'
paradoxical ability to grow aided by partial free will of a minority whilst
(said war/ finance nexus) holding hostage all human survival, & (with it of
course) so repressing free will in general per se (as noted the new security
architecture must be based on regearing the entire geo pol/econ to the culture
of common threats/ objectives confronting all humanity - establishing the
cultural primacy of knowledge accumalation to confront said threats over
military plutocratic hegemony)...
...before the hegemony
of matter over consciousness (of
finance over civil society) collapses under its own unsustainable dead
weight; & free will becomes the decisive
factor...
The corrolary of (the negative
factor of) conscious gravity is the concept of time - space
(eg
as we have demonstrated that time/ consciousness & free will are one &
the same from both the standpoint of
the creator & created, time- space represents the copntrol an
individual/ civil society has individually/ collectively over time - to control
said individual's/ humsnity's destiny - within a given spatial area/ context)
...eg the primal attraction of
property is the desire to own time - space...
...as a means of accruing
independance/ control from/ over nature & other people - which
paradoxically however (inexorably, beyond a certain point) ends up (generally
indirectly) enslaving the owner as well as wider society (to the
hegemony of the war/ finance nexus over civil society)...
...unless
it is aimed (& successfully) at securing an expansion of the
same for the rest of civil society...
Eg this is the principle of inversion,
that attempts to appropriate an excess of time - space (for oneself at other's expense on
balance; or not on balance to the benefit of wider humanity) lead (generally
indirectly) to becoming beholden to the hegemony of your own (finance - via the entrenched
hegemony of the apocalyptically decomposing war/ finace nexus) matter over your
own consciousness...
...a manifestation of conscious
gravity at the molecular/ micro level...
This micro level manifestation (vis
limits of free will), has it's corrollary at the macro level in
that .....
Humanity is long familiar with
concepts of `decadence' and of power elites that exhaust all their ingenuity/
time/ resources on holding what they have. & (even) with their intellects
partially lobotomised, because the logic of such prevents them countenancing
anything different...
...but with the contempory USA in
particular (this is NOT to exonerate anyone else) we see this
taken to a new extraordinary/ manifestly terminal extent...
...at the level of both
the people as well as the elite...
At the level of the USA people,
there is simply a huge market for (distractional short attention span based)
stupidity. They know enough to know they don't really want to know anymore.
They don't want knowledge that places them under obligations to act
differently/ endure sacrifices/ pool sovereignty/ confront head on their own
bullying imperial apocalyptic parochialisms.
This
empire likes things kept simple - hence the phenonemal paradox of the world's
most technologically developed state, yielding ever more ground to Bible based
creationism - increasingly given parity with evolution in USA schools - aided
by Presidential endorsement of said parity)
....The litmus test for this is
Cuba.
It cannot (pre geo
military pol/econ meltdown) be acknowledged that crimes committed by USA
imperium against Cuba are by far & away the single biggest factor that
warps the character of the Cuban state....
...for it cannot end there. Every
other USA geo pol/econ power crime
would have to be admitted such as would demand (not reperations but) a painful revolutionary recasting of the USA
itself, to fit in with the imperatives of a single global pol/econ
constitutional framework...
...only the crash will
(with USA citizens fears for safety of their own children) put this on the
agenda...
But it is at the level of the USA
elite that we see the full power of conscious gravity...
...an elite that owns the whole
world, which forges everything in its' own image, which in history has no equal
in unrivalled power. And yet, which so hates itself and its' own creation &
everyone that fawns before it, it wants nothing more than to destroy everything
to bring our Lord & saviour riding to glory on a mushroom cloud - to save
their helpless fat arse from themself...
Fortunately (vis conscious gravity)
the geo pol/eon meltdown which destroys many of it's transmitting structures
also debilitates said elite's control of the initiative for just long
enough to allow collective free will...
The positive assertion of collective
control of time - space, aided by it's negative corrollary conscious gravity
temporarily undermining said elite's control of the initiative for just long
enough to allow collective free will
...to seize the initiative...
.....Creation (via the self destruct
mechanism) breaks down completely, unless it can become truly
independant by exercising decisively it's own free will (at the
general level)...
...exploiting the cataclysmic threat
to enable it's execution....
Correspondingly therefore conscious
gravity...
(which as already noted makes demons/
intergalactic tyranny impossible as it limits/ sets boundaries on the
power of God's creation - so that,
again, the free will of this creation is/ remains an independant/
viable entity..)....
...sets limits on the power of
individuals (again preventing demons), so that free will (sovereignty)
has actually to be pooled in order to be manifestly exercised, so that mastery
of time - space (the first step on the road to humanity becoming God) is a
collective endeavour...
...so that we can deduce from this,
that the effective exercise of free will, for both
God..
(the
germ of which as already noted, is the mastery of time - space; neccessary to
enable God to ultimately create its' mirror image, space - time; become our
cosmic parents & visit the same crap on successor cosmic generations...)...
...as well as humanity, is therefore
bound up with an acceptance of its limitations...
But as regards the obvious Q, of why
should God set up a program/ process whereby the most precious theory (growing
independantly out of it) is in its' initial development, entirely
dependant on the efforts of one as volatile & precariously perched (socio
economically) such as I,
The obvious riposte, is that on all
planets where this somewhat sordid game is being played out & intelligent
life survives, the terrifying experiance of having so very nearly not survived,
will have the required cultural effect, of progressively eclipsing all
parochialisms. So that intelligent life's vision is forever gyrostabilised by
being cast ever further outwards. NOT just to greater
threats binding it together but beyond this, indeed bound up with this &
beyond terror itself...
beyond
parochial planetary concerns, as it is neccessary to connect with other
planetary civilisations to deal with threats too vast to confront at the (mere)
planetary level, the (drive for) acquisition of knowledge as an end in itself,
must transcend even the culture of the common threats to humanity's existence;
as a precondition to enable humanity to deal with such threats...
.....to become God our cosmic
parents & visit the same crap on the next cosmic generation.
E The Humility of God
What then remains of Christianity
(& other such)? Of traditions reaching back over thousands of years in
which the struggle for freedom has not merely gone alongside but been shot
through with predatory/ colonial murder - as is only to be expected of a
humanity riven through with paradox - emerging/ struggling to break free from
the primordial sludge & strugling to gain conscious mastery of itself???
Is all (by default) to be ripped up
again in the name of a shiny new religion/ ideology, with (not only some of the
apex elite executd simply to establish that law coves & holds accountable
all humanity, but) everything everyone held precious even amidst their own
resentment, cast down into the flames in answer to the siren call of
`purity'???
No. For as seen the new rev theory
which can deal with all said threats arising out of such (which paves the way
for space centric civilisation) itself manifestly draws heavily on/ is informed
by all such (paradoxical) traditions. For without such, it would self evidantly
be quite impossible for humanity to (get a cultural handle to) absorb the
antidote to their apocalyptic component...
Q WHAT
great conceptual principle does this illustrate???
In order for humanity to become God/
our cosmic parents, to avoid fucking up the next cosmic generation any more
than is unavoidably neccessary, it is neccessary for us to acquire a measure of
humility such as only a respect for our ancestral origins tempered by a sober
honesty about their shortcomings can teach us...
For while it is
unreasonable for the next cosmic generation to expect humanity become God to
reduce itself back down to the grimpen mire of its primitive evolutionary
development, it is equally unreasonable for God (now or humanity become God in
the future) to forget the pain and horror of those that did not ask to be
created....
Which
finally leaves us with the great Q, vis the origins of the first supreme being:
7 The Edge of Beyond
`Imagination
is more important than knowledge,
for imagination encompasses the whole
universe’
–
Albert
Einstein
There
still remains the Q:
Who/
what created the first deity/ supreme being?
From
what we have demonstrated so far we can attempt the beginnings of
an answer to this Q in this neccessarily unfinished/ scarcely begun volume –
which may take a billion years or more to complete.
Given:
1)
That (as seen) time/
consciousness & free will are one & the same from the standpoints of
both creator & created.
2)
That it is material constraints in this universe especially death,
that prevents demons from emerging, so that intelligent life must cooperate on
a universal scale to progress to become a new deity or perish.
…Then
without such material constraints the Q can be turned around.
Eg
what (pre God/ existence of any creation) was there to stop
the first supreme being willing itself into existence?
Wheras
constrained by the substance around us, humanity is forced (by logic – not by
the police) to acknowledge our creator in order to progress…
…to
gain control of our time & (through this) universal (God’s/
our creator’s) time, in concert with intelligent life throughout the
universe.
The
drive for such functioning as an incipient supreme being/ God dialectic.
But,
while as (already) noted in Chapter 1, that (vis the Universalist Conception),
to establish the seperation between the written secular constitution & the
unwritten universal constitution (the former is intended to insure humanity
prioritises everyone having enough time to comprehend); we must draw on the
supra reserve of courage to enable such…
…&
that therefore accomplishing this objective will be proof
of the existence of a supreme being…
…The
definitive answer to the Q
`Where
did the first deity come from?’
Is
not immediately proveable with such practical reference to humanity’s
history &/ or immediate historic requirements (vis apocalyptic crisis),
&
I would surmise until we are both ready for & need the answer
to this Q (as a precondition for further progress), it shall continue to evade
us – even as we must pursue it, to power our imagination, the
warp drive of the human soul…