(MK3 Provisional Draft)

Substance Over Form

### Vol VIII

# The Battle of Jerusalem

Conceptually Outgunning

## USA Rapture Psychology

(By Adam G. Ghaznavi)

1) The Battle of Jerusalem

Conceptually Outgunning

USA Rapture Psychology

2) Nuclear Shotgun Wedding

3) The Jihad For the Global Constitution

4) The Apocalyptic Triangulation of the USA Empire

5) Programmed For Self Destruction

6) Paradoxes of the Human Soul

7) The Edge of Beyond

### The Warp Drive of the Human Soul

War will never end because it is seen as wicked; only when it is seen as vulgar

- Oscar Wilde

### The Battle of Jerusalem

### Conceptually Outgunning

USA Rapture Psychology

# (By Adam G. Ghaznavi)

4 Billion years of earth evolution,

10 million years of hominoid existence,

10,000 years of the war/ finance nexus,

& 300 years of industrial capitalism,

…have finally led us to this point in history, where the last bankrupt military plutocratic superpower in history, in a desperate bid to retain control of the military geo pol/econ agenda…

…to preserve the petrodollar upon which the $8Trillion USA budget deficit & $700billion annualized trade deficit is based

Since post WWII boom strengthened the hand of black labor/ radicalism & threatened a rev alliance with white labor…

…the decoupling of the dollar from the gold standard & switch aided via establishment of the petrodollar (the agreement between USA & mideast oil barons that oil be paid for exclusively in dollars) to a credit expansionary/ finance speculative based system (the petrodollar giving USA an `unlimited credit card’ to fund an entire global credit expansionist dynamic) – made it possible to smash black radicalism (especially the Black Panther Party via the Covert Intelligence Program) under cover of the Vietnam War, & consolidate by fuelling the development of a new middle class – eg the USA elite curiously freed by corresponding emergence of global finance hegemony beyond the control of the nation state, from any control that would have held them politically accountable; so that the political crisis was resolved through an economic crisis which was resolved through the establishment of the petrodollar…

& as all the USA had to do was resort to the printing presses as every state needed dollars to pay for oil – perversely the dollar became the `safe haven ‘ currency – further fuelling the (`Ponzi financial pyramid’) global credit expansionary/ speculative boom – including China’s (industrial) over accumalation (productive capacity growing faster than real demand’s capacity to absorb production – spurred by capital’s inherent propensity to… ) compelled to buy dollars to underwrite USA’s trade deficit with China….

Moreover, the petrodollar actually enabled the financing of the war machine needed to protect it (including vis the USA bankrupting the USSR by bankrupting itself)…

…is committing itself to a war with Iran

( to counter establishment of Iranian oil bourse (undermining the petrodollar), the Iranian challenge to USA nuclear hegemony (& corresponding regional strategic interests – vis Iran’s imperial competition in the region)…

The Mullahs driven largely by their own version of USA rapture psychology, failing to comprehend they accelerate their own oblivion by accelerating the dollar crash

…which because it will be such a disaster, it must re-inforce, to prevent USA psycho political economic center collapsing immediately (that very day/ hour)…

…feeding into wider regional/ global pol/econ chaos – including vis Israel/ Palestine which ultimately in desperation will cause Israel (all peoples descending into laager psychology) to demolish the Dome of the Rock – leading to general (as opposed to partial) convergence on Mecca & the Sunni/ Shia fighting against each other in Mecca for the mantle of control…

…anarchy/ the oil turned off…

…Triggering all out race war in USA – USA/ Mexico border war (which is at time of writing 28/1/06 – played down to avoid catalyzing the dollar tailspin – vis fear escalation/ all out border war/ race war)…

Yet paradoxically it is in the very components that make up the global peasant war threatening to over-run a degenerate metropolitan core…

Paradoxically, the geo pol/econ outline of our salvation is to be found precisely in apocalyptic threats unleashed by the war/ finance nexus vis its’

Organic consumptive patterns of control

The dialectics of resource depletion play an increasingly important geo military pol/econ role.

This is not a coincidence, but built into the very process of geo pol/econ linear development/ evolution of the war/ finance nexus…

- At the macro & micro level, consumption functions as a destructive productive means of control (by USA led war/ finance nexus). Eg as an organic process by cconsuming resources/ land etc, you exerted power/ control at the micro & macro level, preventing adversaries individual & macro political, making use of them (Godfather III - `Your enemies grow strong on what you leave behind’)…

And post WWII, this formerly incipient dialectic came into its own as a decisive factor in its own right.

Firstly as a (molecular & macro) block against revolution

This is also why USA helped buffer states to develop as a geo pol/econ bulwark against spread of USSR bloc post WWII.

Secondly (after threat of revolt subsided) through sheer inertial (& hubristic post cold war continuing) momentum.

& the psycho political impact of defeat of progressive nationalist resistence in the cold war.

(Role of Vietnam war in terrorising resistence `destroying countries to save them’ to raise prohibitively the costs of doing so)

…Combined with the cultural/ techno/ corporate expansionism necessary to re-inforce/ consolidate such

including (as a largely organic more than conspiratorial process) to sell the western consumerist vision

This direct imposition of the hegemony/ interests of the first world metropole over the 3rd world (analogous to the way the Roman empire dominated the frontiers – stimulating the development of the very armed formations that over-ran them) has a most curious effect; in that the very structures of imperial control become the very agencies of imperial ruination…

…by those seeking a piece of the pie &/ or to `hit back’ often simultaneously, through insecurity/ instability of supply of key resources, hopelessly unsustainable rates of immigration to the metropole along its own rapid transit systems – as well as through asymmetric warfare…

…which taken together amount in effect to a global peasant war – threatening to over-run the USA led metropolitan core…

For as well as vis technology, the message/ means used organically to control the global peasantry vis modern media/market forces, means the global peasantry now has a global reach/ impact, which has to be taken notice of…

…wheras before, at both the progressive & reactionary levels, there were entire social bulwarks/ classes acting as buffers between the imperial metropolitan core & the great mass of global humanity…

…by (organically) appealing directly to the global people (over the heads of their rulers progressive & reactionary) the USA led imperial metropolitan core has become much more of a direct target, has destroyed the old geo pol/econ buffers between (USA led) metropolitan core & the 3rd world…

Eg if the FMLN/ FSLN failed to resist USA tyranny in El Salvador/ Nicaragua, who cares? Just hop over the Mexican border into the USA…

Pissed off with the way your country is as a result of your previous Islamic fascists anti communist alliance with the USA? Sick of their smug burger munching faces on your TV everyday? Its not your fault, so just blow the mothers away a la Sept 11th…

…Or if you are feeling generous, just blow up an oil pipeline & let them walk their fat arses off…

& this mortal peril, rather than chastening USA imperial hubris, renders it more explosive in its laager psychology. Though the point would have to be conceded, that any failure to check USA imperial hubris leads to an apocalyptic nuclear expansionist decadence/ tailspin in any case.

Indeed as noted earlier, Sept 11th actually stabilised USA geo pol/econ psychology, for a period, by preventing (shifting focus from) scandals vis Enronisation of the entire geo pol/econ gaining their own critical momentum…

& as the essence of the global peasant war is the power to challenge/ even break the (USA led) metropolitcan core without itself being able to consolidate a new/ alternative geo pol/econ centre of gravity; the proliferation of WMD…

USA threatens China, China goes nuclear, India responds likewise, Pakistan follows & trades spare parts to fund its own program…

…must also be considered part of the global peasant war

(moreover, we have already seen how/ why China/ India cannot, as megastates, take over from USA as imperial leaders of the military plutocratic system – so that insofaras they are part of the metropolitan core, they are on basis of war/ finance nexus, even more so part of the 3rd world)

Eg both because USA’s attempts (aided by threat of its own 10,000 nukes) to deliberately retard countries development (so as to prevent them even having the capacity to develop their own WMD programs) feeds inexorably into (global) revanchist sentiment AND because this consequent imbalance is an additional factor meaning the geo pol/econ cost of WMD development is so great that such become the innate focus of the state political psychology (of course, for such not to be hindered, would mean the `effortless’ acquisition of WMD would both encourage others to commit themselves & lead to general quantative & qualitative proliferation of WMD)…

…& were we not already heading for such, this USA drive for `full spectrum dominance’ would be the primary cause for global econ collapse…

Which brings us to the next factor, the failure of the info revolution to either automatically enable a post military plutocratic order, or prevent the collapse of the military plutocratic system…

For inevitably the (character of the) info revolution was shaped by the inevitable rise of global finance beyond the control of any nation state…

…as a tool to assist this process…

& yet the information revolution has made the old repressive military plutocratic state (its machinery), ever increasingly unviable (as a means to retain control – even briefly) – even as it grasps impotently for more power it withers away – without automatically giving rise to a new post military plutocratic order…

Eg for while the info revolution was self evidently integral to the breaking of the power of (generally parochial) organised labor – it nevertheless armed to the teeth the very sam people, as a potential global civil society…

Not so much as workers, still less as consumers, but rather as thinking humans – held together by the culture of the common threats/ objectives confronting all humanity – the chief objective being to gain control of our own time, to not only master all threats to our survival but universal time itself…

But paradoxically, to awaken/ enable global civil society to so mobilise itself, the revanchist 3rd world fascists had to be the initial beneficiaries to help re-animate people in the process of the collapse/ breaking of the old centre BEFORE the Revolution could fill the breech & establish the new centre of gravity (eg vis the aforementioned Nuclear Shotgun Wedding)…

The key here is a general unwillingness to die in strategic battles of for the interests of our elites & how this reshapes the psycho political battlefield – that the raising of the perceived price of blood, vis the 3rd world, is precisely what makes us weak before asymmetric warfare…

…& (paradoxically) gives them the techno advantage

eg as our lopsided/ top heavy techno configuration is turned against us (never mind also by spread of disease from impoverished 3rd world overwhelming the metropole) & not just (though as well by) Al Qaeda’s diffuse cyber model…

even though their `victory’ leads to the destruction of the very technologies that enable them to wage their campaign (leading to descent into primal panic/ chaos etc)…

…that the clue to our collective salvation can be found

Yet, to think it is JUST a Q of counterposing revolutionary global security frameworks/ geo pol/econ reconstructionist programs especially wartime econ sacrifices for solar powered desalination…

Enabled via a managed depression – secure/ stable oil supplies at a high price…

Partially analogous to the way that defeat for Britain in USA war of independence closed of any illusory prospect of passing on costs of falling rate of mercantile profit onto colonists; forcing pol/econ reconfiguration/ a longwave switch of cheap capital (from mercantile trading) towards industrial development, preparing way for longwave boom

The chief difference being, the previous case was an entirely organic process…

(aided by captive markets in India, forced to buy industrially manufactured cotton cloth while the competition was suppressed – a crude symbiosis of war & finance)

…wheras commitment to solar powered desalination requires exercise of conscious global political will – impelled by threats of oblivion if we do not.

…neccessary vis:

1) Sustainable energy & global energy security

Eg given ease of targeting pipelines, development of new supplies only possible on basis of raising living standards in new oil producing locale itself - which over the long run increases aggregate demand outstripping supplies brought on stream by said locale – exacerbating/ accelerating shortage problems

Furthermore the consequent (national security state/ oil energy baron centred secureaucratic) geo pol/econ agendas & (corresponding global finance credit expansionary imperium) have a terminal tendancy to promote commodity fetishistic/ insanely short termist consumptive patterns..

2) Halt the charge into the environmental abyss - vis combined dynamics of global warming/ ice age

Eg accelerated greenhouse effect, leading to drying out/ ignition/ burning of Amazon/ Congo carbon sinks, washing into/ saturating the oceans - a double impact on/ catalysing the release of massive amounts of methane - melting polar caps/ turning of gulf stream leading to mini (or worse) ice age.

3) The Permanent Revolution - Reconfigure (from top to bottom & centre) the entire global social (& political) economic balance of power - permanently

Away from apocalyptic national security state/ oil energy baron centred secureaucratic agendas & (corresponding) global finance imperium; & towards global civil society (`an Englishman's/ African women's home is his/ her power station').

Eg establishing a substantive soveriegnty of the individual - which can be pooled to block any resurgence of plutocratic pol/econ power (with all the apocalyptic consequances such entails).

Eg as an exponential increase in number of nuclear power stations, would be catastrophically prone to budgetry cutbacks effecting safety, such a policy…

(even if not as almost certainly be, inherently abortive - at the geo psycho pol/econ level, eg an instinctive gut awareness of its unviability preventing such holding the centre over the short/ medium term anyway)

…would lead to an apocalyptic geo pol/econ chain reaction of dozens/ hundreds of Chernobyls.

Furthermore, by the time new propsed nuke power stations come on stream, Electro Magnetic Pulse Weapons be readily available – which would require the full paraphanalia of a fascist state in order to defend such – making them MORE of a target for various apocalyptic nihilists; & reducing the wider population to a state of hostile indifference between said forces…

# 4) The Global Energy Standard

As no one will trust unbacked paper currency after the dollar fiasco, & the gold standard is inherently deflationary (encourages hoarding etc), the only way to establish a new currency will be to back it with the most substantive/ vital unit of value of all, energy.

In the immediate term this means oil/ gas – literally the pumping of such liquidity into the market as global welfare as a desperate measure to stave of total geo pol/econ collapse for long enough to enable conversion solar power etc.

The advantage of the energy standard is that it encourages expansionary development of solar power as recipients of global welfare will not wish to so try the patience of their benefactors for any longer than we absolutely have to

(it is also self evident, that refusing to grant such, must lead to the collapse of civilisation & such utter corresponding ruination of those holding the oil/ gas reserves – to the point that the expertise/ infrastructure even to make use of such will be irrevocably lost forever – that to do so will cost them far more than granting such global welfare)

Moreover, the security in depth solar power microgeneration affords the citizenry of every land, will forever be proof against any bunch of thuggish military plutocrats ever again being able to monopolise the entire geo pol/econ agenda for their own petit minded self aggrandizing ends…

Our longterm geo pol/econ survival therefore is entirely contingent upon turning an initially oil/ gas based energy currency into an expansionary solar power energy currency…

This of course cannot take place in a vacuum – hence this work is primarily concerned with the establishment of the new global security architecture & global constitutional framework; which must serve as the preconditions for accomplishing said objectives…

5) Positive impact technology

Eg a long term weapon in the battle against desertification/ enabling farming in the Sahara, so new carbon sinks elsewhere; to buy (more) time capital for humanity, in the war to develop the further measures required to bring the environment into sustainable/ managed equilibrium (eg this will not be the end nor even the beginning of the end, but it will be, the end of the beginning).

…as an antidote to & propelled by everyone’s fear of apocalyptic chaos (from all quarters)…

…is to miss the point about what kind of narrative propels USA geo psychology & therefore what kind of global vision (contextualising said geo strategic frameworks/ geo pol/econ reconstructionist programs – propelled by everyone’s fear of apocalyptic chaos from all quarters) is required to eclipse it…

## USA Rapture Psychology

To note, the underlying logic behind current USA military plutocratic involvement in the mideast is highly complex/ meshed. Most straightforward be the dynamic set in train by Sept 11th 2001 (Bin Laden demonstrating his ingratitude to his old CIA benefactors).

Sept 11th 2001 as much as anything an act of psycho political transference. Eg as Islamic fascists could not possibly be in any way to blame for the condition of states where their ideology predominated in alliance with USA imperium, everything therefore had to be USA's fault, so (to follow this internal logic/ narrative) it was for Islamic fascists to so seize the initiative...

After which invading Afghanistan seemed a pisspoor measure to restore damaged USA prestige...

Eg as the unwritten law be that an American's life is worth so much more than many in the 3rd world; it was neccessary to raise the ante to `restore order' in terms of geo psychology (to show who's boss) Eg some brown people had attacked America, therefore vastly more brown people had to become directly (as opposed to indirectly) subject to the vagaries of American power.

This meant of course, attacking Iraq...

(or nuking somebody - we have Tony Blair to thank for going along with the capital criminal Iraq war, to act as a moral hostage able to slow down, for a period, this psycho political impulse – eg even the likes of Senator John McCain was quick to call for use of nukes vis Sept 11th, & he is by no means the nuttiest).

Which meshed with other prior objectives (pre Sept 11th) of securing oil resources & insuring USA strategic supremacy `full spectrum dominance' (as per official stated USA policy); propping up USA finance speculative/ credit expansionary based system, for a while longer.

But these are only the sane policies, which seamlessly tip over into, pursuing the objective of (totally insane) USA `Rapture' psychology

Specifically the idea of a kind of an `American Israel' where `USA is chosen by God to lead the world to the Kingdom of Christ…’...

(eg as especially such unrestrained power needs to justify itself to itself, `divine sanction' neccessary as legitimising ideology/ narrative - which (as at 12 Jan 2005) over 50% of USA population adheres to; BEFORE any major apocalyptic geo pol/econ tailspin (eg vis dollar collapse) pushes them into primal panic/ desperation...

...To remove obstacles percieved to be hindering the fulfillment of prophecies/ preconditions for the `Rapture' & Christ’s' second coming...

...Specifically to enable Israel (strengthen its position, enabling it) to demolish the Dome of the Rock, rebuild the temple, after which, as per Revelations 7:4, the Jews shall be punished for their failure to acknowledge King Jesus & be reduced from 30 million to 144,000 (the inevitable/ inexorable failure of such a policy to stabilise control of the oil - obviously being the perfidious Jews’ fault; vis their failure to acknowledge King Jesus); whereupon our Lord & Saviour, shall `Rapture' up (to heaven) our apple pie munching bretheren & smite the rest of us....

Meanwhile, in the real world, the use of nukes propels at least 2 general apocalyptic geo pol/econ dynamics:

1) Such violent hostility among ever widening swathes of Iranians etc that USA nukes be used against Iranian troop/ non state, popular paramilitary concentrations, stimulating ever widening firestorms of hatred from all humanity, leading not only to the oil being turned of/ corresponding geo pol/econ collapse, but the whole world on a nuclear hair trigger (USA: `We've started so we'll finish'..)

2) & occurring both entirely independant of the above factor, & catastrophically catalysed by it, the aforementioned econ collapse/ primal panic.

Nuclear strike on Iran cannot terrorise the world in a way which will stabilise it for a period under USA nuclear terrorist hegemony; but leads to immediate global collapse.

So USA has merely a choice between 2 options for collapse of its position. Nuking Iran, or wait for its position in Iraq to collapse (including vis global legitimacy crisis vis trial of Saddam Hussein - see `Apocalyptic Triangulation of the USA Empire & the Omega Option' in `Lucifer2TM.zip’ for details).

The straightforward USA econ based collapse is not theoretically impossible, but less likely – as the reflexive impulse to attempt to retain control of the geo pol/econ agenda likely to lead to ever more desperate ventures

No conventional state policy can arrest this inexorable geo psychology.

Eg a China bluff to threaten to sell (vast reserves of) dollars (to prevent attack on Iran or even to defend Russian territorial integrity from increasingly desperate/ insane USA aided attempts to foment a rising in the interests of elite/ compradorist elements more amenable to USA interests)…

Europe is helping out USA over Iran. For the same reason Britain helped USA over Iraq, to attempt to appease USA laager psychology/ contain use of nukes…

…eg this paradoxically represents the partial sublimation of the ever broadening/ deepening (of) USA rapture psychology, within a legitimized framework…

Q. WHAT about the role of France in backing USA over Syria Q (for historic reasons of colonial pique)?

This is hardly a reason for all Europe to grease the path to the Iran war. This is simply sheer continental drift. That as Europe/ world not yet ready/ prepared to take on tasks of global constitutional leadership, by default, Europe ends up supporting USA policy UNTIL it is apocalyptically exhausted. EU policy can be summed up as `frigging in the rigging – cause there’s fuck all else to do…’

This therefore gives the Iran war the superficial appearance of being about trying to save the petrodollar…

…except of course, following the Iraq debacle it self evidently cannot…

…& USA bombworshippers shall reveal the underlying logic by coming out under their own banner – vis destruction of the Dome of the Rock…

…Therefore vis Iran war, a vain attempt to save the petrodollar, tips over inexorably into its principle logic of USA rapture psychology – but – vis temporary discrediting of all the apocalyptic currents & general desperation…

…providing a just aabout sufficient window of opportunity to engineer new global security architecture/ & corresponding geo pol/econ constitutional frameworks – by trading apocalyptic threats of against each other – held together by culture of common threats/ objectives confronting all humanity…

As USA regime has the operational initiative granted them by virtue of their sheer insanity - until the center collapses – unleashing Americas’ fear of America (as the bombworshippers come out under their own banner – even as they be part of something that terrifies them more than any other deathcult in all history) the key to humanity seizing control of the geo pol/econ agenda & with it, its’ own conscious destiny……

…eg dealing with apocalyptic threat of USA rapture psychology gives Revolution command of the geo strategic agenda, enabling it to deal with all other apocalyptic threats from all other quarters. In the 4th section of this pamphlet we will examine how the Revolution consolidates this process at the geo cultural level in `The Universalist Conception’.

The Battle of Jerusalem
Post aforementioned geo pol/econ collapse, the Battle of Jerusalem is the decisive geo strategic point whereby the entire global agenda (global security framework; which sets the agenda for the global constitutional framework; which in turn sets the terms for the global pol/econ agenda) is decisively shifted from the sphere of military (specifically military plutocratic & warlordist) control, to the arena of (geo) political psychology - the battlefield of peoples’ minds.

Eg it is absolutely impossible to impose a settlement by force. The only viable use of force is that deployed in such a way so as to prevent hostile parties from slaughtering each other for just long enough so as to preserve a sufficient space in peoples’ minds, to allow the new rev geo security/ constitutional & pol/econ settlement to kick in.

In this vein, ` neutralizing doomsday’ strategies are outlined in event of use of nukes by one element or another in `Communique Number 1’ & `Intro to Quantum Materialism’ in Lucifer2TM.zip’.

This process while centred on Israel/ Palestine Q, is designed (woven in with said Israel/ Palestine Q) to force global security trade offs – especially vis control of nuke weapons – which process in turn sets the agenda for/ defines the parameters of the global constitutional & pol/econ settlement (especially for solar powered desalination – to quench the thirst for revenge/ support for revanchist ideologies)…

As we shall see, Britain, Pakistan, USA must give up their nukes sequentially, to enable the setting up/ continuation & completion of a global security architecture – which in turn sets the global pol/econ constitutional agenda…

…wheras other nuke powers within the regional superstates/ commonwealths – set up within the framework of the constitutional agenda (enable/ defined by new global security architecture) are compelled (as we shall see) to give up their nukes to avoid destabilizing said commonwealths; which would so rapidly & completely lead to their ruination as to render such self evidently more trouble than they be worth…

At each step of the way the spectre of global oblivion (among all hostile parties) is exploited to force progress, & the decisive point/ showdown is where all of humanity are challenged to come out onto the streets to actively endorse/ railroad through said global security framework on pain of corresponding oblivion if they do not.

The global focus for this process is the `Battle of Jerusalem’ when the political commander of (British) forces is, must be arraigned for blocking the transfer of the last piece of Palestinian territories back to the Palestinians; until Pakistan (after Britain destroys its nukes – a process monitored especially by the Russians) gives a formal commitment to destroying (all, but beginning with) 50% of its nukes, to be carried out after Israel hands over last of 1967 territories…

In exchange for which Pakistan gets control of the global presidency in Jerusalem (Pakistan destroys remaining nukes), positioning it to focus attention on the breaking of Hindu fascism in India; by among other things rebuilding the Barbary Mosque in Ayodhya and a globalist vision that eclipses Hindu fascism in India (enabling re-unification).

Eg for South Asian troops to lead permanent global onsite control & monitoring of ALL USA nuke installations (all such transferred to global control for agreed global purposes eg asteroid strikes/ the thermonuclear linear shear lancing of the Yellowstone Caldera & after the water has been drained from its volcanic dams, the systematic reduction of the Cumbre Veja volcano – eg as it is more & more the case that the knowledge to create brings with it the knowledge/ power to destroy, you cannot abolish such knowledge/ technologies, but you can & must subject them to global monitoring & control for agreed purposes – as outlined in `Communique Number 1’ in `Lucifer2TM.zip’.).

If at any stage USA attempts to block this process, eg from the removal of the Hebron settlers to the last USA nuke installations coming under global control, the oil is turned of by (incipient) Medina Commonwealth…

The capital of which be Palestine/ East Jerusalem –

…(this framework be mutually preferable to confrontations with Israeli missile command)

…But critically, the global security context that in turn enables Medina to conquer its own internal demons…

(a process examined in next section `Historical Liquidation of the Apocalypse Legends’)

…is a framework of (aforementioned) South Asian consolidation of the Revolution (security) settlement with role of Europe, which in context of unfolding apocalyptic chaos, can only avoid its’ brushfires turning into firestorms/ anarchy by being redefined as the transitional bulwark of emergent Global Commonwealth Confederation…

(we examine how this is done in `Communique Number 1’)

…blocking USA apocalyptic expansionism in order to free up USA visionary expansionism

(not just for solar powered desalination – but also for the `Universalist Conception’ which we shall examine in the 4th section of this pamphlet.).

If Pakistan renages, the threat of non eclipsed Hindu fascism threatens it.

As given the past role of Britain, this is paradoxically BOTH necessary & AND outrageously unacceptable, I have to be put on trial. The Iranians being the best to lead this (natural leaders vis mideast oil; able to turn it of if we refuse) – vis western machinations in mideast…

…I will then (quite properly) be sentenced to death, suspended for 100 days, to allow my hunger strike `Battle of Jerusalem’ to call for popular endorsement of said global security framework…

…politically centred on Jerusalem as the capital of the Global Commonwealth Confederation (defined by culture of common threats/ objectives confronting all humanity – most immediately solar powered desalination as the centre of global security).

The Medina Commonwealth (capital: East Jerusalem) united as a single superstate providing stable supplies of expensive oil – enabling/ catalyzing development of/ shift to solar powered desalination.

…by the whole world (as Iranians etc cannot possibly be expected to take the word of a single western politician for gold coin) on pain of oblivion/ anarchy if they do not…

The mothers being the vanguard/ moral force best placed to lead this process, enabling the eclipse of the paradox of arms, that we need the right to bear arms to keep in check a potential resurgent nuclear/ military plutocratic tyranny but to be effective this right must not actually be used; therefore the mothers as the decisive vanguard/ moral force in the world, enable the resolution of this paradox. Eg the calculus of all force from the state, paramilitary/ even vigilante, to avoid chaos, must from the beginning all be gyro stabilized by this Jerusalem centred focus – eg force is only of value in that it keeps hostile factions apart for just long enough to allow the Revolution settlement to kick in…

The Historical Liquidation of the Apocalypse Legends

In the event of this plan working, I remain in power until last of 1967 lands handed back, Pakistan destroys half its’ nukes; handing over power to Pakistan’s chosen figurehead who will complete Pakistan’s nuke disarmament after my execution.

…further motivated by consolidatory geo psycho political shockwave effect of such (& the power of oil) to chasten any (in any case largely self ruined) USA military plutocrats.
I (or whomsoever else be in political command of the British Army – vis gameplan outlined in `Communique Number 1) must be beheaded by a Saudi executioner (the more blood on his hands the better) in East Jerusalem (the capital of Medina Commonwealth), the sword immediately destroyed afterwards for optimal cultural impact. No other ceremony, gimmicks etc, before, during or after. Nothing that detracts from the stark simplicity of the act - which itself is praxis the final completion of theory & practice, the consolidation of the global constitutional & legal framework.

But it does not end there. Because as Mecca functions as a cultural vortex, destablising any state not big enough geographically, geo politically & culturally to eclipse it…

(hence the pact between Saudi Royals & Islamic fascists – to avoid being culturally outflanked by apocalyptic nihilists) – vis the aforementioned Sunni/ Shia convergence/ ruinous battle to control Mecca

…it will only be the manifest fact that such are self evidently their own worst enemies which shall force the citizenry of Medina Commonwealth to embrace the currently unthinkable on pain of the self destruction of their state (& with it the whole world) if they do not.

Eg just as Muslims administer the Holy Sepulchre in Jerusalem – preventing general war among the Christian states/ factions, so, after Israel has got rid of its nukes

(at a time of Israels’ choosing – Israel having no oil weapon to contain any threat to its existence & no longer being able to rely for their security, on the demented USA bombworshippers who would destroy them anyway)

…so that Israel no longer is in any residual way/ or even can be seen as a threat (in the interim, control of oil is sufficient to gaurentee Medina’s security), Jewish authorities should be invited to administer Mecca

Again the unification of Medina, is entirely contingent upon the denuclearisation of any nuke weapons state within the Medina superstate (eg Iran’s program), that possesses them – failure to do so means the Medina superstate cannot eclipse Mecca as a cultural vortex & spells ruin/ oblivion for nuke weapons state as surely as for the non nuclear….

& I, or whomsoever fills said role, shall use their last speech immediately before their execution to call for such – so that blood fixes the solution in the citizenry’s minds even before the last storm is clearly manifest in its truest form, to be so curtailed. Extinguishing the last diabolic hopes of the USA bombworshippers.

In fact Israel’s role as gaurentor be the historical precondition for the consolidation of the permanent union of the mideast (Medina Commonwealth – preventing fratricidal abyss), specifically the globally re-inforced emphasis on solar powered desalination – which be dependant on the new global security architecture, as same be dependant (as a psycho political/ historical/ developmental objective & accomplished fact) on solar powered desalination…

For the split second the sword kisses my neck to the moment it severs my head, I reign as last king (of the whole world)…

immediately before this (kiss of steel) I am a Republican: & afterwards for the 20 seconds or so before I die, I become again a good Republican…

…& so take to the grave (crematorium) sufficient of the power of the apocalypse legends with me…

…(eclipsed by culture of the common threats/ objectives confronting all humanity) to enable effective cultural as well as formal/ legal consolidation of the developing geo constitutional/ legal framework/ process.

But beyond this, my execution serves as the focal/ historical point of transcendence.

When a humanity forced to assert/ proclaim of its’ own free will the necessity of a single global constitutional framework (by a combo of `Battle of Jerusalem’ with decisively resurgent apocalyptic threats if they do not)

…covering & holding accountable all humanity are (by this final removal of all obstacles/ residual alternatives)…

…irrevocably forced (in spite of every innate/ primal fear of doing so) to accept decisive stewardship of its own conscious destiny (the hegemony of a conscious humanity over its own creation/ destiny)…

The climactic point of 4 Billion years of Earth evolution, when intelligent life finally (in spite of all inbuilt/ innate primordial impulses to the contrary) asserts its ascendancy over the primordial slurry from which it emerged & threatens to descend back into…

& how could it be otherwise?

For a humanity/ consciousness NOT created in the image of a supreme being (by some micro managing celestial Saddam Hussein) but emerging out of matter/ creation, as an independent entity...

But much more (to break its’ auto self destruct programming) humanity needs a vision cast far beyond itself (in order to stabilize even the overarching culture of the common threats/ objectives confronting all humanity)…

…drawing strength/ courage from its’ creator – so that it can master itself as a conscious free entity; to know its’ creator on its’ own terms, as conscious master of its’ own destiny.

I cannot emphasise too strongly that the Battle of Jerusalem has to be seen from the outset of the entire rev process, as the center of its consolidation – if it is to avoid losing its way/ collapse into anarchy. Therefore every single decision has to be taken with respect to this lodestar, which must redefine the entire global agenda.

As whomsoever seeks to establish new global security architecture at Jerusalem (as needs must), will inevitably be branded `antichrist’ (by USA bombworshippers) & the most dangerous idea, arising out of 4 billion years of earth evolution (10,000 years of the war/ finance nexus), is that humanity cannot master itself…

…must rely instead upon a divine saviour (riding to glory on a mushroom cloud)… as evinced in the Legends of `the fall’…

There is therefore, no choice whatever but to turn this to advantage & launch an all out frontal assault against this entire mode of thinking (hence also the `Lucifer2’ marque as the only possible marque for this project)

…By actually exploiting the apocalyptic pre-eminence of such ideas to propel both the antidote (& historic fragmentation of power – eg execution of the political commander leading this process – to consolidate the Revolution/ new global security architecture – holding the attention of before shooting the fox of the bombworshippers) AND the transcending overarching vision that holds everything together:

## The Universalist Conception

…what consolidates this process, what makes the all important drive to solar powered desalination reshaping Europe/ world (including Russia) possible is the corresponding division/ definition of the role between written secular constitution to insure humanity gains mastery over its own time to comprehend/ master the unwritten cosmological constitution…

Eg we see the indispensable role of the Jews/ Israel in enabling Mecca to be stabilized, to stabilize Medina superstate…

Hitherto the Jews refusal to convert to any ideology with universalist pretensions fundamentally called into Q those very pretensions & led to corresponding anti semitic backlash.

This also applied vis the idea of a socialistic equality as an end in itself (rather than as a means to an end, to enable accumalation of knowledge to master both common threats/ objectives confronting all humanity AND universal time itself); as firstly the Jews’ `failure’ to convert earlier to Christianity (socialism’s ideological precursor), called into Q the sincerity of their socialist `conversion’ AND because as an end in itself (lacking even the connecting bonds of war/ finance nexus) parochial socialist equality inexorably descends into nihilistic nitpicking terror & a thrust to control the correspondingly untrusted individual psyche WITHOUT the much wider/ universalist/ expansionist vision to geo culturally stabilize equality – cultural imperatives themselves only possible in this age of climactic apocalyptic fear, sufficient to stimulate humanity’s gaining mastery over itself.

Well, the division between written secular constitution to enable humanity to gain mastery over its’ own time to comprehend the unwritten cosmological constitution…

…is enshrined not just as a Jewish but as a global constitutional survival imperative…

…for now (with stability on basis of war/ finance nexus no longer viable), it is only through instead focusing on a gigantic vision/ universalist conception, that humanity can be culturally gyrostabilised & socio pol/econ order be consolidated…

…As all universalist parochialisms inherently subordinate to the hegemony of matter over consciousness; egalitarianism (as an end in itself) could ONLY be (partially) held together (as an ideological construct) by nat sec state impulses/ external threats (eg vis the Russian Revolution etc)…

Hence no freedom of individual imagination/ conscience was possible …

Within parochial egalitarian ideological construct – equality as an end in itself – rather than as an (aforementioned) means to an end

because no framework for the bridling of such to serve a transcendent common purpose was possible…

Vis aforementioned division between secular written constitution & unwritten universal constitution – the former to gain for all humanity the time to comprehend the latter

Therefore…

As the parochial egalitarian ideological state is God, the state owns the individual, & there is no pooled sovereignty of the individual

…by default, hegemonic power over the agenda remained in control of the (correspondingly) more organically flexible war/ finance nexus…

…Until potential for automatic material development exhausted – specifically by rise & crash of USA led (petrodollar based & speculative finance propelled) credit expansionism – fuelling the terminal clash of apocalyptic parochialisms

Moving humanity from static MAD, to dynamic MAD…

…where now (as seen, to survive) we not only have to balance of the apocalyptic threats against each other, to forge new global security architecture (& corresponding constitutional pol/econ framework)…

…but that (to survive) we can & must, bridle to a common purpose, the wild horses of the human imagination…

…With the universalist vision of intelligent life's mastering of its' own time as the key to mastering the universe…

(time, consciousness & free will, being one & the same thing from the opposite standpoints of both the creator & created – see Chapter 3 Vol V of `Substance Over Form’, `paradoxes of the Human Soul’ in Lucifer2TM.zip’)

...as (given the sparsity of intelligent life in the universe) the technologies enabling humanity to make contact with other worlds - can only be developed once humanity has mastered itself...

...which means prioritising control of its' own time to think, above all else - reducing matter/ finance from the status of master of all humanity, to servant of this conscious objective....

eg conscious gravity determines a maximum level of automatic material development…

(over 4 Billion years of evolution, 10 million years of hominoid existence to the now 10,000 year old war/ finance nexus) before the self destruction mechanism (vis the terminal dialectic of credit expansion descending into military plutocratic rapture psychology) kicks in, preventing darth vaders/ demons etc, eg our inflicting our apocalyptic neuroses on the rest of the universe…

…(threatening terminal collapse into unbridled irredeemable horror) unless intelligent life gains mastery of itself (eg if we fail, any future descendants, would as they develop & learn about us, would literally be driven insane by the knowledge of what we had & pissed away – such that their own developing knowledge would be their nemesis. All the marbles of 4 Billion years will be decided on the turn of a single card, in the Battle of Jerusalem)...

(& this has to be a conscious decision on the part of intelligent life; as otherwise intelligent life would be no more than the slave of an all controlling celestial Saddam Hussein as opposed to an independant entity/ consciousness - that however needs to tap into its creator/ God/ the supra reserve of courage, in this ultimate pivotal struggle, to enable it to gain mastery of itself)

& vis those that think, vis development of a universalist civilization, that as Johnny come latelys, we have nothing to contribute, would be remedial no hopers of no interest to any advanced beings (with a million year or so headstart over us), perhaps profoundest of all for us all to cling to as we approach our darkest hours, is that those civilizations that have such a headstart, would know just what we had to overcome within ourselves & externally, for us to develop the technologies required to enable us to plug into the universalist network, & however many times they witness such do so for the first time, it will never ever fail to move them to the quick of their very souls – for this is what it means to be truly conscious…

…& if ever they lost the sense of that, they know their power would evaporate that very instant…

…for such be our salvation, individually, collectively & universally…

Eg USA apocalyptic expansionism can only be finally defeated by USA visionary expansionism (eg most obviously, against this extreme traumatic historical & cultural backdrop, search for earthlike planets as well as solar powered desalination). & it is in this peculiarly (British) American characteristic of this project, that humanity attains full mastery it’s own destiny…

In conclusion, if intelligent life must become God, does this not imply a creator???

& in what way does intelligent life taking control of its’ own time to gain control of universal time/ universe (& becoming God) actually demonstrate existence/ role of a supreme being???

It is that because (as we have seen) to prevent our self destruction such a gigantic conscious (& therefore free will based) objective, eg intelligent life (gaining mastery of its own time to gain mastery of universal time the universe &) becoming God, is required; & that it is only enabled/ propelled by such apocalyptic threats (descent into chaos & hegemony of matter over consciousness – requiring such a conscious leap on pain of oblivion), that free will becomes a decisive historic factor enabling such a conscious leap

…which itself (because such a conscious leap could not come about via stable linear development) self evidently requires a transcendent connexion (with our creator), humanity simply drawing on a (the) supra reserve of courage, to enable such a conscious leap…

& that this duel imperative proves both the existence & role of a creator God (the self evident duel necessity of our needing to gain mastery of our own time to gain mastery of universal time, the universe & become God to avoid oblivion) & the need for a transcendent connexion with our creator to enable us to make the conscious leap; proving the existence of a creator God.

The Qs raised by this…

(especially vis how the written secular constitution enabling humanity to master its’ own time is both imperative to understand AND distinct from the unwritten cosmic constitution – vis how both Time Consciousness & Free Will Are one & the same from BOTH the standpoints of the creator & the created)

…are dealt with in more detail in `Paradoxes of the Human Soul’, & attempt to begin to deal with the Q of the origins of the first God/ cosmic generation, is made in Chapter 7 `The Edge of Beyond’…

2 Nuclear Shotgun Wedding
There is however, an inescapable paradox at the heart of my work.

In that I self evidently lack either the means to launch such a process by myself…

(that is, to be permitted to do so by the historical requirements of the situation – making it at least theoretically possible to do so – quickly/ effectively enough to a decisive cadre),

…or a pre-existing political army/ formation able to seize the initiative (which is similarly not possible until geo pol/econ conditions permit a stable synthesis of organization/action with theory).

& my old plan (from previous theoretical paradigm `Lucifer2.zip’).....

To sit on my arse, wait for the trial of Saddam Hussein (& corresponding global legitimacy crisis) to launch my work…

(matched to said legitimacy crisis – see `Apocalyptic Triangulation of the USA Empire & the Omega Option’ in `Lucifer2TM.zip’ from the old `Lucifer2.zip’)

…at the universities, wait for personnel in such to converge on me (over an extended timeframe) when geo pol/econ conditions ripen - whence I would have new paradigm developed/ deployable - aided by such a readymade infrastructure giving me global reach...

... is increasingly eclipsed by the fact that opportunity to deploy a viable theory increasingly tends to only come with the point of total breakdown itself.

So that there is no time for me by myself to deploy theory/ set up such a process of self assembling infrastructure, that springs to life as geo pol/econ conditions ripen.
Therefore (vis Iran war/ USA Rapture psychology) this 2nd Manhattan project can no longer function as a one man band, as it needs centralized (as opposed to defuse/ guerillaist) infrastructure/ systems/ networks, to enable me to continue to develop theory right down to the wire, before launching it – when the chaos is right on top of us - & everyone is ready for the antidote to such, at any price…

Which is why finally, having eliminated the impossible, the last option that remains is to work with elements of the establishment on basis of the core paradox…
.....that the (USA led) military plutocratic elite depend on the Revolution to seize power (from the war/ finance nexus/ machine they are the gilded slaves of), to save their (everyone's) children: & that the Revolution (to avoid global annihilation) is dependant on this factor & must tailor it's entire military pol/econ framework accordingly...
The pivotal strategic objective is to capture universities as focal points for establishment of provisional govt (when geo pol/econ meltdown transpires) able to martial the broadest swathes/ loyalty/ reluctant grudging support of civil society...
We examine how a British led Israel/ Palestine (Jerusalem centred) settlement serves as the means for re-engineering the entire geo strategic agenda (& with it the entire global constitutional political economic framework) in `Communique Number 1’ – which needs further development especially in the light of `Conceptually Outgunning USA Rapture Psychology’).
So, more important than `Revolution from Below' (the regime centre will collapse anyway - Revolution's key initial task, is to insure there is a cadre with the vision/ able to hold new order together) is Revolution `from the middle' (the nodal networks - universities) & also critically `Revolution from Above' - (via the spread of new rev technology, eg by peoples of all classes terrified of impending apocalyptic breakdown)
...fusing with `Revolution from the middle' & when the storm breaks, from below in managed/ controlled fashion; in the context of (& to resolve) unfolding geo pol/econ chaos...
For we are stuck between 2 iron laws, `we are where we are' & `we need to be where we need to be'. & (as history has decreed that we deserve each other) we are all stuck with each other for company, as we try to carve out the path from the one to the other...
So while it is neccessary to bring a sufficient minimum to trial of the (British) military plutocratic elite…
To demonstrate our burning bridges with the old way of doing things (to lesser breeds without the law)…
& that we see our security/ future as being entirely dependant upon the establishment/ consolidation of a geo strategic/ security framework & in turn a single global constitutional geo pol/econ framework/ settlement – gaurenteeing every people’s legitimate security concerns.
…without which we will not be able to hold the center (eg vis Israel/ Palestine to begin process of developing said geo security framework – see `Communique Number 1’; or even at home) in the interim – to enable such to be established.
…excluding the British Army (but not the Crown) from this process (as needed vis Israel/ Palestine etc…)…
…the capital political responsibility for whose action is shared by BOTH the Crown/ senior reps (eg political & institutional figureheads of state itself, eg MI5/6 & against backdrop of econ chaos, some of the high & dry speculators – whose interest determined the geo pol/econ agenda) & AND the revolutionary political figurehead orchestrating this process,

beginning in London – moving as rapidly as possible to Jerusalem which must at all times be the psycho political focus of the process see `Communique Number 1’ for details of said process – in need of modification in light of `Battle of Jerusalem - Conceptually Outgunning USA Rapture Psychology’ etc

Eg this less & less appears as a conventional trial or (such as I originally envisaged several years ago) even a conventional political trial, at all…
…& more about, illustrating to the whole world how/ why we all find ourselves embroiled in this process vis the climactic end of 10,000 years of the war/ finance nexus (itself the climax of 4 billion years of primordial Earth evolution), in which humanity must finally (confronted by apocalyptic threats of its own making gain conscious mastery of its’ own creation/ collective destiny or perish; & how by all accepting our responsibility, we can use said apocalyptic breakdown of the war/ finance nexus to propel new global security/ consitutional/ pol/econ frameworks/ settlement enabling us to finally gain mastery of our collective destiny as outlined in `Battle of Jerusalem - Conceptually Outgunning USA Rapture Psychology & `Communique Number 1’.

Eg Free will only becomes a hegemonic factor once all potential for automatic development on basis of the 10,000 year old war/ finance nexus is exhausted.

Until then, we could (within limits) chose what role we played, but not the rules of the game…

…for only the final exhaustion of all potential for development on basis of (war finance nexus eg)hegemony of matter over (human) consciousness makes free will a decisive hegemonic factor ..

Eg to use the apocalyptic threats to propel the geo cultural/ constitutional/ pol/econ antidote to said threats…

…to establish law, the primacy of civil society consciousness over its’ own creation…

Q How does this differ from a normal trial?

Because it is not just about a particular criminal act committed in a given time & place by a given individual/ group…

But about humanity facing up collectively to the collective problems derivative from its’ entire evolution/ development – across 4 billion years of evolution, the struggle of consciousness to emerge/ gain primacy over the dust/ matter from which it emerged.

That the first great machine it ever created/ that propelled its development (the 10,000 year old war/ finance nexus) enslaved it…

That in the final epoch of war/ finance nexus, we are all holding weapons of mass destruction of countless different forms eg: nuke/ bio chemical, environmental, ideological, trade & geo political, parochial/ ignorance, indifference etc.

…that threaten wholesale oblivion…

…& that while as a first step, executing some gilded slaves of the war/ finance nexus, is necessary to confirm our intentions/ the mere beginnings of a directional shift to the world & to ourselves, it is not by any means the most difficult task on the long road to global salvation that confronts us (in dismantling all said weapons of mass destruction in all their forms)...

…that it should be understood as a necessary but strictly delimited first step in the general perspective of the tasks that confront collective humanity & absolutely nothing more…

This is why the trial of the military plutocratic elite is merely the first of 3 great inter linked trials; eg of military plutocratic elite/ hegemony, secondly of myself (as outlined in the section: `The Battler of Jerusalem’) to set the geo security agenda in which the 3rd great trial `The Battle of Jerusalem’, eg of all humanity itself, is challenged to pro actively embrace (take ownership of) what it will take to seize control of its own conscious destiny – on pain of oblivion if it does not…

Vis the crown, the dreadful inescapable conclusion be that the method of execution must match the measures deployed by the British army against Palestinians trying to breech the Israeli border.

…(with all the kit Thatcher & co sold Saudi in the interests of national security – alerting Israeli missile command)

….or the last settlment before gaurentees given by Pakistan about dismantling nukes (as outlined in the section: `The Battle of Jerusalem’)…

…which would set in train a terminal unrestrained psycho political momentum to go all the way & drive Israel into the sea. Certainly such would not have been & needs to be cauterized as part of the process – by Pakistan nuke disarmament demorilising Islamic fascist psychology.

…so that such will not precipitate general war/ total collapse, but rather be channeled into the incipient constitutional/ legal framework/ process (outlined in section: `The Battle of Jerusalem’) of security trade offs, forced through under threat of MAD/ global apocalyptic anarchy…

Eg to lengthen the psycho political fuses of the hostile parties in Israel/ Palestine (& the region/ world generally); to enable this, the political commander of the British army in Israel/ Palestine is personally stuck with the task of carrying out this murder of part of every one of 60 million British people, even of all humanity.

Eg if such is not done, then Palestinians/ Arabs will certainly accept British role in overseeing establishment of a Palestinian state, but without the geo strategic caveats required to prevent geo psycho political momentum developing a terminal velocity, such that any attempt to stop such will result in oil being turned of & general war, as oppose to the trials & corresponding global security exchange that must be set up vis the global psycho political Battle of Jerusalem decisively eclipsing the role of the military as a hegemonic factor – exploiting the threat of MAD to engineer single global security/ constitutional framework – held together by the very threat of apocalyptic anarchy….

Bearing in mind the army traditionally needs a stable fixed point to owe allegiance to (a crown or an established constitution) to avoid anarchy, to what does the army owe allegiance to in a world of flux???

`Recognising that it is self evident that all human survival is contingent upon the establishment of a common framework of global security, serving as the foundation of a single global constitutional settlement & legal framework, protecting all & holding all accountable – that the alternative is oblivion,

we pledge our loyalty to the provisional govt in the establishment of a common global security framework – centred at Jerusalem’

Eg key point, in the interim, Britain can only avoid anarchy/ hold together transitionally if defined by objective of global security framework centred on Jerusalem

Eg it is the very lack of a viable British constitutional settlement that impels such a Jerusalem centred framework – to prevent anarchy…

Even Europe (into which Euro Commonwealth of the regions of Europe, Britain must dissolve itself) can only avoid the various brushfires springing up turning into raging firestorms which will consume it utterly, if it is redefined as the backbone of the Global Commonwealth Confederation – enabling (middle eastern) Medina commonwealth/ South Asia to act (as outlined in `Battle of Jerusalem’) as checks against USA rapture psychology – eclipsing USA apocalyptic expansionism in order that USA visionary expansionism can save the world vis solar powered desalination & the universalist conception…

…Eg the nation state is too small to tame global finance hegemony (of war/ finance nexus); & too big to be a peaceful region; therefore unless redefined for such purposes, to enable transition to geo constitutional blocks able to act as bulwark components (establishing balance of power) against the power of both global finance hegemony & any individual leviathan deluding itself that it can dominate the world/ sleepwalking into some variant of apocalyptic rapture psychology, inexorably prone to hegemonic manipulation by same & anarchy/ collapse (as well as, in order to keep the geo pol/econ agenda centred on global reconstruction, especially solar powered desalination)…

In slightly modified form William Blake’s `Jerusalem’ also serving as the emergent global anthem (words to the effect of: `throughout our planets’ green & pleasant land…’)

Helping to fix geo psycho political focus on Jerusalem/ Battle of Jerusalem…

This way, we shift the focus away from (no longer viable) static fixed points (in people’s minds) to (as is necessary in state of apocalyptic flux) a gyrostabilised vision – propelled by the apocalyptic chaos, & centred on its only viable geo strategic point of consolidation, Jerusalem.

Said anthem (Jerusalem) can also function as a key (even decisive) weapon at the aforementioned Battle of Jerusalem – giving everyone a button to cancel out the nuclear buttons, by registering support for the alternatives – though the words will only recover their sweetness at the point when the Battle of Jerusalem takes root in everyone’s soul…

…in conclusion, it is this point on the edge of humanity, when the old order cannot hold the center, & the new has yet to establish its’ global legitimacy; & be so unimagineably hated for doing what needs must in order to enable it to begin to do so, that is the most perilous of all in human history. For it represents the gravest threat of a tip into outright inhumanity/ oblivion on the one hand; against the absolute certainty of doing so if we refuse the leap.

we should all of us recognise that:

... in the terrifying paradox of transition, whereby the old ways continue as they collapse, & yet also be changed & also be seized by a paralysis/ duel fear of apocalyptic anarchy; resulting from consequences of their own military plutocratic geo pol/econ policy & fear of revolutionary measures (the good, the bad & the ugly) from above or (even more from) below…

1) Regime needs the Revolution (as per the core paradox) to avoid immediate & total anarchy….
2) The Revolution needs remnants of the establishment to prevent collapse for just long enough to allow the Revolutions’ geo strategic solution/ settlement to kick in – led by (aforementioned) Jerusalem centred global security framework (setting the terms for the global constitutional/ pol/econ agenda)...
3) It is only the provisional legitimacy of the emergent rev geo strategic framework (centred on Jerusalem – see `Communique Number 1’ – which needs further development in light of `Battle of Jerusalem - Conceptually Outgunning USA Rapture Psychology’) providing a gyro stabilized/ global psycho political focus & corresponding prospect of global security/ constitutional/ pol/econ settlement - that props up remnants of the establishment for just long enough to allow them to function as transitional scaffolding for the revolution in the interim (pre settlement) period.

4) Therefore keep bloodshed to the absolute minimum necessary, to go just about far enough to demonstrate to 3rd world we have committed ourselves irrevocably to this process, to enable us to enforce the Jerusalem (Israeli – Palestine) centred geo strategic process in the way/ degree (we must assume be) required to avoid a collapse into anarchy, without immediately precipitating said anarchy (as outlined in `Battle of Jerusalem…’ & in more detail in `Communique Number 1 in `Lucifer2TM.zip’).
So it is in this spirit of painful co-operation that I commend `Lucifer2TM.zip' to you now; & ask your help in spreading said theory & the countless other ways required....

....As there is also obviously a problem, in that I need to concentrate on further development of said theory, rather than pitch a static model, I cannot emphasise too strongly the transitional character of `Lucifer2TM.zip'
Correspondingly I still retain a slightly modified cyber guerillaist capacity (as per subsection `The Revolution in Kit Form’ – in `readmefirst05.html’); eg most of the vectors of propagation from `Lucifer2.zip’ match to unchanged works, awaiting further development – especially vis when geo pol/econ conditions ripen
....Where changes have been made, they are marked accordingly in `Political Nuclear Physics'
Eg as it is dangerous to get too far ahead of time, as time has the vicious character of springing back ahead of you in general proportion to your previous advantage, I am anxious to be as closely matched to the point of geo pol/econ breakdown as can be, so that my work is just about good enough to serve as a viable starting point from which to proceed...
...Therefore it is important not to panic, but to remain in formation as such, to match the key moment, or else be strung out over the march across time...
If one charges too far ahead of time, the inevitable unripeness of what will consequantly be your lead concepts shall permeate the entire structure of your work, you shall develop a corresponding complacency vis ideas you think you be the master of, which means in the interim you are not properly (instinctively & intellectually) attuned to the neccessity of their further development; & therefore fall behind - strung out over the march across time.
Eg before/ initially, the rev theory's evolution was geared to working classes, thence (post Sept 11th), increasingly to the nodal elements in the middle classes, now impelled by (threat of historical electrocution &) USA rapture psychology, we are forced to step up another gear...
(accounting for how/ why we instinctively refused to over commit to any of our previous models, until sure that history had itself, committed itself decisively)
...to unleash the Philosophical Revolution (vis conceptually outgunning USA rapture psychology), as the initial vector - a cavalry charge (deployable now that history has decisively committed itself) to be followed up by (global mobilisation of) mass (political) infantry support (to claim the field/ & ever increasingly, to hold the centre) - when geo pol/econ breakdown occurs...
It is only now (having developed the appropriate political technology to match such threats) that I can bring myself to accept that only when USA bombworshippers march under their own banner
..as a result of the fact that USA militarists, uniquely among such in history (unique to the extent this is the case) don't actually want (themselves) to do any fighting, therefore the only remaining logic is to press the button & hope our Lord & Saviour will come riding to glory on a mushroom cloud -
...precipitating America's fear of America, humanity will be sufficiently terrified to adopt & develop further, my counter measures.
Looking back, there is no way in 1987 or even relatively recently, I could have reconciled myself to such a notion, without becoming (defacto) one of those that advocate everything must crash (for all practical purposes, irretrievably) into the abyss for some miraculous resurrection/ transubstantiation to occur - without bothering to develop any corresponding counter measures.
USA bombworshippers aside, I reckoned circa 1987 (when I became a professional revolutionary - & even before) Revolution to absolute imperative, because even in event of a new period of longwave rev reform/ reconfiguration of the capitalist system, humanity would not survive the resultant proliferation of inherently apocalyptic technologies, on basis of military plutocratic elite hegemony – eg without civil society hegemony/ control over how such technologies are developed/ deployed & to what purpose.
So paradoxically (on the other side of the equation), without trying all this time to steal a march on history…
You can always tell when you are really desperate, when you are forced to ask the Q `If hope existed, what would it look like & where would it be?’, & plot a course to intercept it accordingly.
Well, never have I used this dead reckoning device with greater frequency than in compiling this pamphlet/ transitional paradigm.
This fact & that it holds together at all, leads me to the conclusion that, it is the future, but definitely not the present.
`I have seen the future & its’ a damn near run thing’
…I could never have kept pace with it. Therefore such, a voyage across the universe of one's own ignorance, was neccessary, to develop further the new political technology, to get to each staging post just in time, to remain in the game, to struggle to get to the next objective.
Eg if I had not developed (as outlined in `Intro to Quantum Materialism’ Chapter 6 subsection `Here’s one I made earlier’) a subscenario to deal with the BNP Q (a couple of months) before September 11th (to combine with scenarios related to asymmetric warfare) I could not have developed subsequant paradigms; history would have run too far ahead of me to be able to catch up, to produce the outline gameplan which (when conditions ripen - via America's fear of America) the rest of humanity can/ must develop further in every way required, in action, in theory, wherever they are, however they can.
(etc, until my death - hopefully effectively deployed - consolidates new rev culture & corresponding global constitutional/ legal framework)
Each new objective more starkly forbidding than that which preceeded it...
Likewise for all humanity in the future (Keeping its' correspondingly exponentially increased knowledge/ imagination continuously occuppied in a kind of `intellectual Big Bang').

3 The Jihad For the

Global Constitution

Central to the culture of the common threats/ objectives confronting all humanity…

Including vis threat of a mini ice age – vis flooding of gulf stream warm water currents with glacial freshwater turning them off…

…necessitating development of Africa as our global insurance policy, in turn dependant on solar powered decentralist development

Based on the basic social econ unit as a freestanding unit – access to energy, water & info giving it strategic depth, consequently also able to pool sovereignty & therefore see of all security threats from predatory warlords/ magnates that have no mandate from the pooled sovereignty of wider humanity

Precisely it be only via such that especially impenetrable Africa could be in any way (however destructively) be opened up – as only such had the levers (of war/ finance) to do so – the sheer impenetrable vastness of Africa in particular overwhelming humanity’s attempts to master the territory. territory.

Hence any attempt to copy the conventional model of development must fail – even any significant wealth generation develops such internal migration across wide & porous borders (increasingly a problem for the west – ironically prior to its geo pol/econ crash) as to overwhelm same.

Unless, development based much more (though not exclusively) on the freestanding social econ unit (energy/ water/ info), so that there is both not principally any boomtown locale to flood into, AND people know they will be made use of/ be able to develop.

Thus the balance of power will come to lie not in New York, London or even Jerusalem. But in the hands of the sovereign individual.

& as a model which the whole world must adopt as a framework of development (eg India’s jugular the glacial River Ganges threatened with extinction – therefore solar powered desalination necessary as both a fallback and to enable development without destroying the Ganges – similar for China with its insane policy (as at 27/7/05) to build 600 new coal fired powerstations & Europe/ USA itself.

Thus by enabling hitherto impenetrable planet Africa to be colonized by the Africans & the world to be developed increasingly less via logic of the war/ finance nexus &more on decentralist development, we forge also the developmental techniques and above all, the mindset of a truly space faring civilization – which by definition can only be begin or fail on our own home world, not by inflicting our apocalyptic neuroses on the rest of the universe.

…Is the universalist conception, which in practical terms is about insuring for all humanity a progressive mastery over its own time, to enable education/ accummalation of knowledge – driven by the overarching culture of the common threats/ objectives confronting all humanity (bridling egos elaborate)…

this in turn means the permanent constitutional bridling of finance to serve (regional/ superstate/ global) civil society (instead of global civil society being under the hegemonic imperium of the war/ finance nexus), through a new constitutional division of power…

...through elected Workers Pension Councils - a permanent bulwark against destructive finance speculation & freeing parliaments from plutocratic hegemony; & setting the global investment agenda within parliaments (redistributive/ social wage geared) tax regime - a constitutional division of power between the twin pillars of state -
(establishing a rev global framework for reconstruction consisting of free access to markets/ freeflow of capital between G.C.C. member states - eg sharing the same rev constitutional framework, the emergent Common Ownership of Information.....
the progressive liquidation of all copyright/ corp control of info which requires a military plutocratic national security state to guard it, including full disclosure of nat sec state info itself beginning with the pr-requisite for the global security architecture (vis ALL nuclear info), enabling dismantling of all nukes except those under global control by the Global Commonwealth confederation troops in the USA (eg to systematically reduce the Cumbre Veja Volcano after it has been drained of the water in its volcanic dykes & lance the Yellowstone Caldera); Eg as the increasing power to create inevitably brings with it the increasing power to destroy, the key thing is that all such technologies should be placed under the control of global civil society for the agreed purposes agreed by global civil society…
- to enable us to forge/ consolidate a working operational connexion with global/ 3rd world civil society,
eg the military plutocratic system has crashed. And the remnant can only be propped up by the revolution for just long enough for it to serve as a brace to enable the stable construction of the Revolution settlement – as per the necessity of extending the nuclear shotgun wedding between the old order & the revolution worldwide
.......& additional seedcorn aid via a redistributive formula/ mechanism within the G.C.C. - WARTIME sacrifices for global reconstruction specifically solar powered desalination shall be endured with whatever reluctance as to refuse such would lead to re-emergence of a military plutocratic nat sec state by default to keep the 3rd world down, eclipsing the common ownership of info impelling a new Revolution).

(As we shall see) These defining objectives vis the culture of the universalist conception are absolutely imperative, in enabling humanity to (just about) hold itself together (in the extreme turmoil following the aforementioned crash of the military plutocratic system) at ALL stages of the revolutionary transition before & after the Battle of Jerusalem…

Including in developing/ extending the nuclear shotgun wedding globally in order to (aid development of global security architecture &) stabilise the emergent common ownership of information – in a context in which the old structures will have collapsed/ be in freefall to the extent that secrecy of any kind (if not to be simply displaced/ replaced by unbelievably savage warlordisms) will have to justify its role, if it is to function as a transitional aid to order…

…eg specifically as a lever to enable new global security architecture to be established enabling solar powered desalination (eg solar powered desalination enabling substantive sovereignty of the individual thus stabilising common ownership of info = Socialism).

As will become clearer in the history section(s), we are all responsible for this nightmare & even for closing down the options others had leading to criminal choices/ logic. But the scale & demands of the objective of enabling humanity to gain mastery over its own time, & through this universal time, so dwarfs the old hatreds that it is precisely by depoying every nerve & fibre of our being to this collective survival logic, that humanity can just about make it through to the broad sunlit uplands…

Britain (barely) stabilised by Jerusalem centred focus, & threatened by Europe’s bushfires, must spread the nuclear shotgun wedding to Europe via the Battle of Berlin…

Which in spreading the nuclear shotgun wedding by combining the strategic repression of resurgent classical fascists…

Eg due to residual fear of Germany & Germany’s fear of Germany, the British must so prepare a Germanic led European people for their destiny

…with the re-orientation of Europe to Jerusalem, the forging of the global security architecture & Europe’s role in leading the constitutional consolidation of such – which however, while battle of Berlin can/ must temporarily stabilise Europe for just long enough to prevent descent into anarchy until the battle of Jerusalem, it is only the global conscious context of the latter that enables Europe to so redefine itself

& by definition if Britain must lead this process, ULSTER must lead it…

As (since Sept 11th, Iraq war, increasingly unsustainable immigration flows into mainland Britain) the mainland classical fascist psychology/ focus is now so absorbed by mainland ethnic minorities; it is increasingly inconceivable in the context of the geo pol/econ crash that Republicans be increasingly smashed (vis collapse of the peace boom & assertion of the right to commit genocide within our own borders) & then the classical fascists shift focus towards ethnic minorities.

Rather the latter so absorb the classical fascist focus, that Loyalists stuck on their own without any state support & driven out (& onto the mainland to re-inforce the onslaught against the ethnic minorities) by the Irish Army. This is of course excessively optimistic as geo pol/econ collapse/ primal panic will have led to social liquification before such stately ambitions can be realised…

Pre Sept 11th I had been geared up to the idea that the global speculative finance/ credit expansion propelled USA budget/ trade deficit would lead to dollar collapse/ soaring interest rates/ global credit crunch/ hyperinflation & geo pol/econ tailspin collapsing the Ulster peaceboom leading to war gathering its own momentum, spilling over onto the mainland & merging with Tory anti EU political warlordism (the right to commit genocide within our own borders) – the need to combat such via paramilitary attacks on classical fascist formations (military & political), & take the attack to the enemy via a rev pol campaign held together as a continuous process by antifascist hunger strikers (as focal point of the campaign – enabling the delegitimisation of the regime/ continuous martialing of forces) – re-inforced by parliamentary wing in event of elections being called to relegitimise the regime/ fraction of such.

As this would only work on a European scale, to establish a Euro Commonwealth of the regions eclipsing the nation state (too weak to establish civil society hegemony over global finance – yet too big to be a peaceful region) & defined for a Global Commonwealth Confederation to contain the threat from USA caesarism etc in turn defined for the Green Revolution (wartime sacrifices for solar powered desalination to quench the thirst for revenge from the 3rd world/ stabilise the immigration Q by aiding development of 3rd world), this necessitated the export of the methodology by British antifascists via Battle of Berlin to fix the centre of gravity of Euro Commonwealth be breaking the threat where most feared in Europe (paradoxically as Germany afraid Germany, it would only be the British awakening the Germanic regions to their historic role as backbone of Euro Commonwealth, leading Europe, leading the world, which would psycho politically enable them to so take the initiative; & which gyro stabilising vision would enable unification of Ireland within a Euro Commonwealth, providing a new covenant of security for Loyalists replacing the old collapsed nation state based based security construct).

I had (pre Sept 11th 2001) partially developed/ regeared to a subscenario whereby anticipated explosive growth of BNP in April 2002 local elections necessitated a containing/ pre-emptive strike in case of major electoral breakthrough (otherwise the combination of a major advance combined with economic tailspin would have threatened a (psycho) military political rout; if not contained be a position prepared before the geo pol/econ crash.

Since Sept 11th , the changed psycho political focus decisively shifting attention away from USA budget/ trade deficit (finance scandals/ crises feeding of themselves & merging into a single firestorm catalysing meltdown), the Ulster Q became a backwater, & the new conditions did not permit the BNP to raise the stake required to play the ultimate game - establishing a paradoxical period of apocalyptic stability.

A parochialism that is paradoxically best positioned & motivated to eclipse parochialism, & knows best (especially Billy Hutchinson) how to put out the brushfires…

Indeed the very concerns raised about its leadership, insure that in order to maintain the seperation of powers…

…Europe follows through in leading establishment of global constitutional framework

Eg the fusion/ expression of Europe’s global constitutional leadership, consolidating the new global security architecture via its global institutional commitment to solar powered desalination/ decentralist development; is European Commonwealth intervention in South Africa after the Battle of Jerusalem…

The commitment of European peacekeeping forces preventing genocidal slaughter of the white minority in South Africa for just long enough to allow the rev settlement to kick in…

…eg the very fact that Europe seriously risks its blood in so doing, insures that European state forces become an institutional bulwark for pushing said general framework of rev reconstruction, to insure the security/ survival of European troops…

Compelling Europe in turn to adopt/ consolidate the liquidation of the nation state in favor of the constitutional framework of a Commonwealth of the regions of Europe – based on civil society control of finance through elected workers’ pension councils….

Eg the nation state is too small/ weak to control the power of (global) finance & yet too large to be a peaceful region – yet it is only an apocalyptic crisis of such magnitude that could induce Europeans to so transcend their national identities/ parochialisms on pain of oblivion…

…if Europe spurns its historic role as restorer of global balanc of power/ initiator of a new global constitutional order – held together not merely by the culture of common threats/ objectives confronting all humanity – but the aforementioned universalist conception…

…which is the best gaurentee Africa could ever want that Europe will forge its entire pol/econ around the objective of developing solar powered desalination/ decentralist development. So that Africa can function as Europe/ North’s insurance policy – vis threat of a mini ice age – galvinising African political psychology around a role that gives it an increasing sense of purpose as it develops; enabling it to transcend the psycho political drag factor of its vast interior… with a universalist vision increasingly cast outwards towards the stars, contact with intelligent life throughout the universe, to intelligent life becoming God & visiting the same crap on the next cosmic generation…

Q while mothers’ movement enables eclipse of paradox of arms, endorses global security architecture, particularly drive for solar powered desalination, making possible European commitment in South Africa WHAT (given the backdrop of the Iraq catastrophe) actually compels it???

It is the CONSCIOUS realisation that if Europe does not project itself outwards at the critical geo pol/econ point (to re-inforce the global security architecture with the new global constitutional agenda/ pol/econ framework to re-inforce the global culture of the common threats/ objectives confronting all humanity) Europe will turn inwards & devour itself…

Eg it is Europe’s own extremely perilous instability that helps propel/ drive this process…

As regards the identification of the key point, as the flashpoint between black & white & its contentiousness, THIS is what helps compel Europe to re-inforce its armies with WARTIME sacrifices for reconstruction specifically solar powered desalination – a process that must be fought with all the desperate survival logic of an all out war…

Paradoxically, it is only by committing our armies to peacekeeping in South Africa…

…thus shifting the entire geo constitutional pol/econ focus of Europe & with it the world to the geo pol/econ solution that underpins the security of its troops, solar powered desalination based for global security…

…that European (ethno national based) fratricidal strife is eclipsed & the spectre of a golden horde from the collapse of the Russia/ China (to say nothing of a vast array of other apocalyptic dynamics) can be addressed by providing geo pol/econ points of support to enable corresponding geo constitutional frameworks (we will now outline) to be established in Russia, USA, Medina Commonwealth, South Asia & China.

As to the Q How is Europe temporarily stabilised before the battle of Jerusalem???

Perhaps the point is it barely can be, & this is what gives the battle of Jerusalem its decisive focus/ power – eg if Europe could be so stabilised, it would imply it could hold together without the battle of Jerusalem at least to the degree that it develops a sufficiently complacent attitude to the Battle of Jerusalem that Europe unquestionably would not be desperate enough to respond to it, it would fail & thence later Europe descends into chaos.

Q But why given the nuclear shotgun wedding, is this necessary???

Actually, it is the decisive expression of the nuclear shotgun wedding. The old state cannot hold together & the new state (vis both Battle of Jerusalem & the revolution settlement that has not yet kicked in) cannot yet hold the centre…

It corresponds/ is integral to the revolutionary calculus of force, that force cannot be used to conquer, only to prevent hostile peoples from killing each other for just long enough to allow the rev settlement to kick in…

…again it is only the focus on Jerusalem that makes this at all viable…

The very first step in this direction, of a conscious Europe beginning on the path, must be a nuke free Europe; The Europe led global constitutional imperatives driving the consolidation of the new global security architecture…

& this changed geo cultural constitutional geo pol/econ environment (including vis the universalist conception/ culture of the common threats/ objectives confronting all humanity) is/ can serve as the first precondition for the salvation of Russia forging a new FSSR.

Eg vis the pre crash model adopted in place of post Soviet compradorism (itself only stabilized via inertia from the burning off of the Russian fascist threat by the deliberate destruction of the Russian army as a threat either from the right or the left as a potential powerbase – especially of a progressive general like General Alexander Lebed) – as result of high resource prices.

Initially Putin wanted to use the funds from the breaking of the resource boyars/ compradors to monetise Russian welfare, to enable the development of a `normal’ Russian capitalism. But, this sunset Alexander II model was unviable as corresponding internal migration would fatally undermine the Russian state – China with its comparatively inexhaustible reserves of cheap labor in any case undercuts the world market – so consequently, to insure that reliable resource barons kept out of politics/ financed the state, was the line of least resistance – creating an internal geo pol/econ model of `industrial tsarism’ positioned between/ dependant upon the USA (budget/ trade deficit) credit expansionary boom maintaining the demand for Chinese goods & with such, high resource prices…

The collapse of such (with USA credit expansion/ Chinese over accumalation), fatally undermines the (relatively) strong Russian national security state…

So the Q poses itself how/ what is to hold Russia together???

In the interim, the fact/ mutual conscious, geo psycho political realisation that Europe need Russia & Russia needs Europe, to establish the geo constitutional agenda…

(eg the extreme closing down of historical options/ illusions to these 2 choices: global mutual self destruction or a desperate all out struggle to forge the new global security architecture & constitutional framework held together by the overarching culture of the common threats/ objectives confronting all humanity – beginning with the all out struggle to develop solar powered desalination/ global energy security….)

…& new global security architecture that enables Russia/ FSSR to survive/ emerge…

& just as Russia previously held itself together (as a territorial megastate) by defining itself for Christianity & against the Mongol Horde, for the Socialist Revolution & against western imperialism, this time Russia is no longer alone & will be conscious of this - Firstly in terms of the role of the global security architecture….

….& secondly in terms of the role of Europe as a geo political point of support…

Europe in committing itself to Africa forced to correspondingly re-engineer its’ constitutional pol/econ – serves as the geo pol/econ point of support & template for Russia/ FSSR

… Russia/ FSSR (minus the nukes, to win the confidence of its periphery who with the collapse of the USA empire have nowhere else to go but will all the more then be suspicious of any national security Russian state construct; & enable FSSR to take its place in a multi polar world) can reconstitute itself for a global/ universalist vision – adopting similar constitutional framework enabling over time the substantive sovereignty of the individual to develop.

This holds the FSSR together by giving the Soviet people a constitutionally & geo politically underpinned stake in their pol/econ…

Eg the emerging global sovereignty of the individual (as a global economy based on solar powered desalination – even where this is less effective in especially cold regions for at least part of the year) & a global pol/econ constitutional framework to underpin/ entrench (through pooled sovereignty) their collective interests is imperative; so that they are willing to go/ stay where otherwise they would not, save their legitimate geo pol/econ security/ interests be properly institutionalised to gaurentee such…

To forge such a FSSR, it requires a strong presidentialfigurehead working with the active support of civil society (particularly the regions etc). Certainly not an oligarch, so by process of elimination (the workers being so weak) this points to the army, & a figure like the late General Alexander Lebed – who unfortunately died in a mysterious helicopter crash.

Enabling FSSR in conjunction with Europe (& the new global security architecture) to:

…Chain up USA apocalyptic expansionism (necessitating also that the USA army be reduced to guarding its borders - including vis immigration - & be subject to aforementioned obligations to place its nuke facilities under global control/ monitoring as per the aforementioned global security architecture)…

…in order to free up USA visionary expansionism (adapting similar constitutional framework/ geo cultural imperatives) vis solar powered desalination…

…enabling USA to play a stabilising role in terms not only of global energy security, but in helping to orchestrate the new geo politics necessary to bring it about…

Enabling USA to express its legitimate (heavily modified) security interests in terms pro-actively consistent with those of the rest of humanity;

Panic throughout USA society at all levels is a terrible peril, so it needs someone able to orchestrate the internal cultural & social pol/econ coalition in USA, specifically someone able to unite progressives of all stripes around the idea of global energy security, whilst simultaneously adapting/ pruning not smashing to smithereens the old security architecture towards a transitional stabilising role – someone perhaps like former CIA chief James Wolsey.

Eg the key to USA security (to enable tight immigration policy) is for USA to make itself indispensable to the 3rd world…

…especially Latin America (to win allies in such)…

Curiously it is precisely the radical forces that have emerged/ strengthened in Latin America (post cold war)

…That represent USA’s best lever of survival…

…as USA’s crash partially deprives them of a galvinising enemy, exposes the weakness of parochial egalitarianism – lacking a wider visionary objective

(elaborate)

& thus leaves them doubly exposed before their own desperate peoples – that may accept that yes, USA was largely to blame for this mess, but what are they going to do to get them out of it???

As it is clear that no force has the power to both vanquish their (erstwhile) adversary AND hold the center, by process of elimination, the only remaining option (except MAD) is a practical alliance – to prop each other up – based on USA making themselves indispensable… & Latin American revolutionaries doing their utmost to provide a geo pol point of support/ stability by not encouraging mass immigration into USA OR (especially) seccession – in fact doing all in their power to restrain such; as such would be to undermine a decisive aid to their progress…

A factor geo strategically manifest at the global level; by USA’s active acceptance of the process of establishing global security architecture/ constitutional framework - & Latin American radicals using their weight to sell such to peoples of the mideast/ 3rd world that would otherwise by inclined to a revanchist logic – buying time for humanity to allow the antidote to kick in…

Hence it is only via the universalist conception…

The written secular constitution – the guiding objective of which be to secure for humanity mastery over its’ own time to comprehend the unwritten universal constitution (eg equality as means to such an end not as a mere end in itself)

…That the USA/ Latinos can be ideologically, politically, economically & geo strategically reconciled…

Which in turn entails the global capital to be moved to Jerusalem – which correspondingly must also be capital of the Medina Commonwealth…
The region of the Medina Commonwealth (stabilised in the run up to the Battle of Jerusalem by being the focus of the whole world in emerging global security architecture) has little experience of parliamentary/ civil society operation so the transition is not quite so obvious…

But, as well as the fact that it self evidently requires Jewish administration of Mecca to prevent Sunni/ Shia razing it with fratricidal strife, it therefore also needs to stabilise the vortices of Mecca/ Medina via aforementioned constitutional vision based on Universalist Conception – humanity gaining mastery over its own time (to enable humanity to acquire the knowledge to deal with the common threats/ objectives confronting it – beginning with solar powered desalination…), to gain control of universal time/ universe etc (become God our cosmic parents & visit the same crap on the next cosmic generation)…

…Specifically in order to enable the division between a secular written global (as well as Medina Commonwealth superstate) constitution & the unwritten universal/ cosmic constitution that the former is designed to help humanity (acquire the time to) understand…

Thus restoring/ refining the golden core of ancient secular Islamic culture, that to pursue knowledge for causes/ objectives greater than oneself is the measure of oneself, others & all humanity…

…The Palestinians are geo politically best placed to lead the development of Medina Commonwealth focussing it on the world, most obvious figurehead being Marwan Barghoutti…

Medina (from Jerusalem) therefore holds & gyrostabilises the focus of the whole world & is in turn held stable by it…

& what denuclearises/ keeps Medina Commonwealth denuclearised, is that possession of nukes would generate such apocalyptic internal fratricidal suspiscion/ conflict as to blow the Medina Commonwealth to smithereens – to the self evident ruination of all peoples…

But what paradoxically partially stabilizes Pakistan in the interim, is the very fact that it can barely be stabilized – needs a certain cover/ protection from the incipient oil superstate (Medina Commonwealth)

Firstly (vis the oil Q/ agenda – as outlined in Chapter 1), in terms of keeping the USA nukes off Pakistan…

…indeed the very fact that Pakistan has been given this extended lifespan, pulls it into the rev geo pol/ strategic orbit (encourages development of nuclear shotgun wedding);

…which partially cuts the ground from underneath Hindu fascism; barely sufficiently, to buy enough time & space within Indian civil society’s mind, for the incipient global security architecture agenda (as outlined in Chapter 1)/ global constitutional agenda/ universalist conception to sufficiently begin to take root…

Which in turn scorches any illusions that Pakistan can any longer stand on its own (an agonizing interim self conscious parochialism) – geo psychologically preparing Pakistan for re-unification with India…

…Eg Medina Commonwealth becoming more clearly defined in terms of its superstate identity – rather than (as at time of writing 18/2/06) as the vortice for 1.5 billion Muslims – is an added factor in Pakistan, recognizing by due process of historical elimination, its only viable long term security/ developmental option

So that aided by said geostrategic cover from Medina & Pakistan’s presidency of the Global Commonwealth Confederation as it gives up its nukes as outlined in Chapter 1 vis global security architecture

…with Hindu fascism partially marginalized, Pakistan can push for the consolidation of such vis rebuilding of Ayodhya mosque/ other geo strategic gaurentees…

…& the vision of unified South Asia, geo culturally stabilised by its role (vis global security architecture, outlined in Chapter 1) as leading check on USA apocalyptic expansionism (enabling USA global visionary expansionism), it is in many respects similar to Europe in its otherwise self evident propensity to fragmentation without such a vision…

The Q that drives development of a similar constitutional framework in South Asia, in a way similar to that in Europe (to protect its troops in Africa) is the choice, either:

Be the leading check on USA (& China), as the emergent transitional power bloc eventually eclipsing Europe (before Africa takes charge); & develop solar powered desalination energy generation that saves instead of killing of the River Ganges. Or:

Succumb to fratricidal strife/ disintegration/ annihilation…

The critical thing here is, that like with the FSSR, it is now changed geo pol (constitutional) context led by Europe (as well as the new global security architecture), that makes it possible for aforesaid component constitutional factors impelling such in India; to play into/ orientate itself towards (aforementioned) global constitutional dynamic.

When do the Indians get rid of their nukes???

What compels such???

Pakistan nuke disarmament marginalizing Indian nat sec state in power

Indian monitoring of USA nukes

Eg therefore as India begins/ grows into its role it finds its nukes get in the way of internal domestic stability, hampering its global role – compelling Indian nuke disarmament to stabilise internally/ enabling India to perform its global role…

…& if India does NOT adequately contain USA nukes, then the oil is turned of by Medina – as well as of course, India losing its own visionary geo cultural focus(USA visionary expansionism entirely contingent upon the chaining up of demented USA apocalyptic imperial expansionism) upon which is contingent the salvation of the Ganges.

The Chinese export led boom (brought down by the crash of the USA petrodollar) was the product of a combination of factors…

Mao’s takeover in 1949 was far less the product of a rev peasant war, than of the 5000 year old bureaucratic imperial mindset of Chinese geo pol/econ…

China had always been defined in terms of the struggle to hold itself together, especially post Genghis/ Kublya Khan.

So wheras European nationa states went of in search of colonies to provide resources so that they could use such to fight each other better, finance growing out of this imperative to serve the sword, then becoming the hegemonic factor so that the sword served finance/ industry…

Because, paradoxically, the very size/ wealth of China meant that the relative impact of such would have been (potentially) much more limited

…Ancient China for all its remarkable technological accomplishments,

could not afford to allow the merchant class to be given their head; for fear that this would undermine China’s internal fabric/ lead to fragmentation of the country/ correspondingly expose it to invasion…

Hence the merchant class was kept in check & therefore, all developments led to a circular dynamic, meaning the imperial bureaucratic system was never actually replaced by a merchant class/ labor movement, indeed the benefits of such whether in agriculture/ industry/ communications merely fed through in terms of absorption of such via a population rise – on basis of the old order…

Correspondingly, rebellions, vis concept of the `mandate of heaven’ tended to restore things back to their default settings – rather than fundamentally change the socio pol/econ order…

Indeed, post opium wars/ Taipeng & Boxer Rebellions, such progress as did develop in China, led to increasing power of gentry capital in such fashion as inexorably tended to/ accelerate break up of the country – vis the warlords…

…leaving China exposed to invasion…

The consequance of this, was that neither the merchants, especially not the workers & peasants could control/ re-unify the country…

This drove nationalists Sun Yat Sen & Chiang Kai Shek into the arms of the USSR (& a perilous balancing act to try & retain control of their armies).

Which meant post defeat of Japan, as the nationalistarmy was crawling with USSR/ CCP agents, they could feed such info to the CCP as enabled such psycho political momentum to build up, that especially with the Russian invasion preparing their positions earlier, the nationalist position just flaked away – leaving Mao in power…

However, it was one thing to bring Mao to power, quite another to control China; & in this the USSR over-reached itself; for by default what now existed, was an old restored imperial Chinese mindset with of necessity a nominally revolutionary 3rd world nationalist ideology – with pretensions of super power greatness…

& it was only the exhaustion of such on a `revolutionary’ basis (vis `Great Leap Forward’ & `Cultural Revolution’) combined with (especially as USSR weakening before USA credit expansionism) unlocking of latent capitalist potential of Chinese peasants…

…yet kept in check, by a modified/ modernised/ reformed 3rd world nationalist ideology…

…that enabled China’s export led boom to develop – USA finishing the job by so buying the defeat of `communism’, by opening its markets to Chinese goods…

But petrodollar crash notwithstanding, as the development of the (Indian & Chinese) megastates (whose size prevents legitimation of imperial ideology) beyond a certain point, causes their population to see their elites as the main threat, it is only via civil society hegemony over finance/ substantive sovereignty of the individual (enabled by solar powered desalination) that such could/ can ever develop much further without explosive civil strife.

For China can only be stabilized by equality – but not as an end in itself, only as a means to an end – vis universalist conception…

…for only via such a constitutional mandate of heaven (seperation between written secular constitution & unwritten universal constitution) can China be freed of ALL emperors/ imperial pretensions/ ideologies; finally join the rest of the human race by joining the rest of the universe4…

…for China, nothing less will do…

Therefore China needs global re-inforcement/ security frameworks to stabilise its development/ with its own citizenry as a globally connected (rather than an insular) people.

Just as the world correspondingly needs the potential threat of China, to help its constitutional vision stay anchored beyond the vortices of its own parochialism…

Eg if we stabilise the rest of the world, we tend to get China (more or less) for free…

As the collapse/ temporary restabilisation of USA led geo pol/econ via aforementioned Jerusalem centred agenda, breaks through China’s insularity.

…causing the Chinese state to be at one & the same time delegitimised AND potentially radically modified/ relegitimised by collapse of USA led imperium. If the Chinese state (connecting with the new global security & constitutional agendas seeks to avoid a maelstrom far bloodier than anything the Taipeng ever waged &) co-opts (vis another nuclear shotgun wedding) Chinese civil society in a framework of global dialogue based on forging the new global security architecture, solar powered desalination & geo pol/econ constitutional framework – held together by the universalist conception, of humanity gaining mastery over its own time (& to deal with common threats/ objectives confronting all humanity, to gain mastery over universal time/ become God itself)…

vis China, as the retention of nukes self evidently equates to the retention of an insularist national security state agenda, threatening a new Taipeng on the one hand & conflict with its’ globally orientated/ stabilizing civil society dynamic on the other – weakening the Chinese center before (said) Taipeng type threat (of disintegration)…

…It shall be the establishment of the wider global framework – especially Europe’s commitment to South Africa – that enables Chinese civil society to provide a sufficiently constant point of support to consolidate the new order – by pushing decisively Chinese nuclear disarmament.
In conclusion, while the initial overarching political agendas of India & China are captured by the aforementioned forging of the new global security architecture – vis battle of Jerusalem (mention again the Ganges), it is only by binding Europe into South Africa committing Europe irrevocably to the Global Commonwealth confederal framework/ Green Revolution, that we sufficiently convince Chinese civil society we are serious – such that Chinese civil society thence becomes a sufficiently constant point of stability…

…to provide in the context of the aforementioned managed depression/ global switch to (solar powered desalination enabled) decentralist development, a sufficient check to the process of internal disintegration to prevent collapse into anarchy…

& it is the dynamic combo of these global & micro pol/econ imperatives that maintain the (aforementioned) resolution of the paradox of arms…

…sufficiently to insure that even (indeed especially) amidst the collapse of the old war/ finance nexus military (plutocratic) systems, the various regional armed formations checking China’s tendancy to military expansionism (not to say descent into outright warlordism), are better able to buy time & space within the minds of Chinese civil society sufficient to allow the rev antidote to kick in, than any military plutocratic MAD system causing all to march behind their own military plutocratic elites towards oblivion…

…indeed through such a dynamic of containment, that as the policy decision that has consciously to be made by everyone every day, is to choose between sustainable development or environmental/ expansionist/ warlordist self destruction – it is paradoxically, actually the (receeding) pre WWI/ cold war type apocalyptic annihilatory tension that serves to keep everyone sufficiently focussed on the end objective of the Green revolution & the Universalist Conception – so that the latter can eclipse the receeding threat…

…even such that sufficient degree of stable cooperation between the regional blocs can be mounted to check the tribal narco fundamentalist/ warlordist threat from Afghanistan, both by external containment & fostering sufficient internal points of support with a sufficient stake in the future to check/ break said forces of chaos in the future Edinburgh of Central Asia in a way that can only be done via solar powered desalination giving access to electricity/ clean water/ information to the women & children of the warlords in their very strongholds, the last fight of such being therefore, not against USA/ USSR or China, but with their own families & indeed with themselves…

eg you cannot abolish by presidential or parliamentary decree, human ego/ venality/ characteristics that have evolved over 4 billion years of earth evolution, 10 million years of humanity & 10,000 years of the war/ finance nexus. But you can so trade off & balance each corresponding threat off against each other, so that such can be bridled by, to serve the culture of the common threats/ objectives confronting all humanity, so that ultimately fear itself be ever more eclipsed by the electrifying vision of the struggle of intelligent life to become god, our cosmic parents & visit the same crap on the next cosmic generation….

##### 4 The Apocalyptic Triangulation

of the USA Empire

This all begs the Q, HOW the hell did we get into this mess???

Whereby it is only the super apocalyptic threats that stimulate/ enable/ terrify humanity into gaining mastery over itself???

Central to humanity’s disabling confusion is the idea that humanity was created in the image of God, which in turn as a corresponding reaction, gave rise to the delusion of purity of reason…

…both exclude/ are blind to the impurity of logic of a humanity (riven through top to bottom to its very core with paradox) emerged over 4 billion years of earth evolution from pondscum with the capacity to become God…

…& it follows from this, that we be thus far blind to the historical processes (emanating from this paradox) that have led us to this point.

WHAT is the foundation of this delusion???

The original oppression of humanity by nature; & with the eclipse of the natural economy, by a rising population requiring settled agriculture & in turn the means to defend such, the corresponding enslavement of humanity before the first really great machine it ever created, the war/ finance nexus…

Beyond a certain point, the land (`natural economy') could not support a rising population.

Thence it becomes necessary both to resort (beyond an episodic/ incipient level) to settled agriculture (to feed rising population); and also (to defend both the natural resources of the land & its husbanded agricultural base which necessitated) the development (beyond an episodic/ incipient level) of a war economy, war technology (increasingly metallurgy), which further drove economic & technological development....

An emergent war/ finance nexus (increasing circulation of means of exchange, especially gold/ silver, acceptable across incipient state boundaries between allies & adversaries alike) breaking up the earlier protohistoric economy (which tends very much to be under-rated in it's technical sophistication) as it dictated the social pol/econ agenda internally (within each emerging proto state construct) and externally by setting the agenda for patterns of trade & military pol/econ alliances....

…the corresponding subordination of human consciousness to the hegemony of matter/ finance over civil society…

As to argue with the rationale of those asserting that humanity’s intellectual faculties must be subordinated to one of the antique books, alledgedlydivinely inspired by a God that expects humanity to take on trust the word of one of the said books, but woe betide if you pick the wrong one – is self evidently self defeating, we shall begin with the contempory failure of classical rationalism, both capitalist & Marxist…

…either to hold/ re-establish a viable geo pol/econ centre of gravity on the basis of hegemony of finance over civil society OR to enable global civil society to establish control over finance enabling humanity to master itself…

#

#

# Capitalist Long Wave Cycles

Q. Smart Alecs like you have been prophesying the death of capitalism since 1848. Even now a dwindling band of flat-earthers quote Marx's words (circa 1848) about `...the choice facing humanity being capitalism or barbarism....', without the merest hint of sarcasm. So what conclusive proof can you offer to serve as capitalism's death certificate?

To understand the evidence, it is necessary to have a basic understanding of the pathology of the capitalist/ military plutocratic system & also why Marxism/ laborism has failed.....

The question hence arises what historically causes capitalist long-wave crisis? And is a new cyclical long-wave boom likely?

Capital is invested in:

New productive capital (plant/machinery etc).

Workers' wages (b1), and social wages(b2), eg. real demand.

Dividends (c1) and speculation (c2).

Welfare (d1), this is derived from taxes on (b1) and an expansion of the national debt, the costs borne predominately by workers, therefore it cannot properly be considered an additional part of real demand. And corporate welfare (d2), this includes arms contracts, pension scams, profit guarantees etc.

Capital is motivated by the pursuit of surplus profits (above the average rate of profit), causing capital to flow into those sectors where profits are highest.

Over the expansionary long-wave, the organic composition of capital (a), its' productivity, rises faster than workers' wages and social wages (b1,b2), real demand; which rise but not sufficiently to absorb all the products of (a) over the long-run. This is called over-accumulation (of capital).

This over-accumulation of capital in a given sector, or the economy in general, causes market saturation or over-production; as there isn't' sufficient real demand to absorb all the products. This happens because the pressure of capital for growth in its' assets or a return on its' investment (c1), causes over-accumulation - productivity to grow out of kilter with real demand. This causes the rate of profit to fall in real industry (over the long-run) below the culturally expected level (ranging from country to country dependant on the relationship of class/imperial forces).

When this fall in the rate of profit takes place in a certain sector or sectors, this causes periodic downturns (in a period of general upswing), until (with weaker concerns bankrupted etc) the rate of profit recovers to the average rate of profit.

When this process of over-accumulation and market saturation becomes generalised throughout the productive economy, capital finds itself caught between two fires:

Corresponding falling real demand (of workers and social wages absorbing production).

(in context of general preceeding longwave boom) demands for higher wages (threatening the rate of profit and over-accumulated capitals' share).

Unless (impossibly unlikely) capitalism were to voluntarily accept an evolving loss of hegemony (over control of production) and concedes either an evolving and continuous rise in wages or (preferably) in social wages, to bring the production/real demand relationship into kilter (for sustainable, stable and continuous growth), the situation cannot be (peacefully) resolved.

This crisis leads to a build up of inflationary pressures - the struggle for surplus value - as capital seeks to pass the costs (of its profits) on either in higher prices to consumers or trades-union aided `social contracts', holding wages down threatening investment strikes & lockouts. And increasingly there is a regressive long-term switch of capital into speculation (c2), including the expansion of credit (against inflated property prices); and a growing dependency on military contracts (squeezing real demand still further) and corporate welfare (d2) - combined with a squeeze on (b1, b2 and d1).

However as the only source of real wealth is real industry, these financial/speculative `investments', serve only to further milk the productive base of industry (and real demand able to absorb production), with demands for ever higher dividends - effectively treating capital as (unsustainable) income. Capitalism therefore has an increasing tendancy to disappear up its' own speculative arsehole (see rise and fall in land/house prices etc).

It is a myth/lie that interests rates are used to `combat inflation'. The only way they `work' is by discouraging productive economic activity. This hammers real demand giving the purely cosmetic statistical appearance of lower inflation (reduced economic activity).

In fact the raising of interest rates only serves to increase (proportionately & aggregately) the demands of parasitic finance (for ultimately higher dividends) on the productive base of the economy, weakening real demand (eg. increasing exorbitant mortgage/rent rates and chronic indebtedness - REVEALED NOT CAUSED - when the speculative/property bubble bursts) institutionalising inflation (in hidden form, see indebtedness) and increasing susceptibility to inflationary pressures over the long-term (& ultimately a global credit crunch leading to global stagflation/ hyperinflation).

Low nominal inflation conceals the impact of indebtedness and therefore merely illustrates the triumphal victory of capital over labor's capacity (through traditional means) to resist this continuous and permanent assault.

The sole function and purpose of raising (real) interest rates is to restore the position of (especially unproductive finance) capital over labor in a period of crisis/permanent crisis, and nothing more. To re-iterate industry cannot/dare not resist, because this would mean mobilising the masses, who would then in turn force their own more radical agenda afterwards.

The problem can be summarised simply as:

Capitalism is out of kilter viz real demand and accumulation

There is no (automatic) pol/econ mechanism to correct this. Eg. via increased wages and/or social wages - WPCs preventing capital being/becoming (again) a law unto itself - freeing a democratic parliament/local govt to play this (redistributive) role.

Such long-term crisis when resolved/resolvable, were done so through a long-term rise in wages (necessary to provide the basis for a long-term upswing) after a re-ordering of the productive forces (the national & global division of labor - in turn) prepared & aided by a long-term fall (in the previous period of long-term downswing) in wages (by the reccessionary long-wave) and a decline in productive investment - raising the (potential) rate of profit after (the implementation of) revolutionary reform - As a starting point, from which the long-wave boom then generates its' own momentum, with reforms & rises in wages - until it eventually collapses due to over-accumulation.

The key examples are:

Post-Chartism & Revolutions of 1848 - After the break-up of the hegemony of landed capital (by the abolition of the corn-laws and the last remnants of feudalism in Europe) foreign trade was expanded and the (real) domestic purchasing power was driven up by

a) A reduction in the price of bread, meaning people had more real demand/purchasing power to purchase industrial products.

b) A raising in the price of labor (caused by extra industrial activity by foreign trade and a)-), as demand for labor grew; so did its' ability to bargain/push for higher wages in turn creating more (real) demand.

Until over-accumulation/market saturation brought the long-wave expansion to an end in the early-mid 1870's - beginning a long-wave downturn.

Gladstone/ Asquith (continental Europe had similar variants) - With a new rise in radical politics & militant trades-unionism, threatening to assume revolutionary-political characteristics (brought about by the early -mid 1870's - late1880's reccessionary wave).

a) Simply allowing laborism to force higher pay (and later Asquiths' more pro-active) reforms expanded the purchasing power of labor (whilst cutting the ground from the more extreme elements).

b) An expansion into new colonies creating new markets - in turn raising demand for labor/wages and real demand.

Until over-accumulation & market saturation led to the crunch battle for markets of WW1, and the collapse of national capitalisms in Europe.

The Global Political-Economy - The fall in real wages brought about by the victory of fascism across continental Europe (smashing the labor movement) - and the (liberal imperialist) development of the global pol/econ by the process of WW2 enabling USA led global rev-reform FDR having implemented rev reform in USA beforehand, in response to the revolutionary shock of Huey p Longs’ `Share the Wealth’ campaign in the context of the Great depression – of which more later) in response to the post - WW2 radical uprisings/expansion of the USSR empire into central Europe; provided the starting point for the boom & expansion of free-trade & world market (representing an advance on the old national capitalist systems of imperial preference & tariffs that preceded them), Which then as before, could generate their own development/momentum.

Conversely, the rise of global finance can be seen as not merely another stage of development but as a quantum pol/econ dynamic, that will either lead to its' (structural and molecular) revolutionary metamorphosis, or its savage implosion. As no single state is capable of taking the lead in the global reform of the system as FDR/USA was able to before.

Eg the rise of global finance beyond the control of the nation state has eliminated all room for bargaining between capital & labor....

...& with it all room for revolutionary reform/ reconfiguration of the geo political/ economic system in response to radical shocks, such as had previously been implemented - when the state was strong enough to act as arbiter between capital & labor.

For threatened by a hemorrhage of hot money (seeking the highest short term return) the state must either carry out policies finance capital likes, eg conducive to short term speculative profits at the expense of industrial investment and reconstruction (which of course makes things worse over the long run), or alternatively carry through a comprehensive revolutionary transformation of the political economy, insuring all profits are re-invested in industrial civil reconstruction (instead of share dividends and speculation).

For it is simply not worth the aggro and chaos finance capital will cause (eg through currency destabilisation and capital flight), trying to cling to this or that minor reform. Or indeed by resisting the swingeing cuts in services, investment & workers' wages; hence also the permanent war on workers' civil rights viz the need to consolidate this process politically.

Moreover the (global manifestation &) consequences of this policy....

....the arms race to bankrupt/ destroy the USSR coupled with USA's backing (arming/ financing) of Islamic (& other) fascists in the 3rd world (in order to maintain 3rd world peoples in their subservience to core imperial elite) who choking on the despair they (in partnership with USA led military plutocracies) themselves created, turn their rage on the west (accelerating its slide into military pol/econ anarchy).....

....& USA nuclear blackmail/ threats against China, leading to China developing nukes, scaring India & correspondingly Pakistan into going nuclear...

...demonstrate that this reconstruction must be global, requiring wartime sacrifices to further fund it - or else in keeping the 3rd world crushed, the state will choke on its own barbed wire & a degenerate military plutocratic elite will re-emerge by default.

& Megastates India & China cannot take over leadership from USA, as due to their sheer size, their military plutocratic elites' (anti colonial) national security state justification for existing is actually undermined by the growth of their economy, revealing them to their own citizenry as their greatest enemy (rather than any foreign power defending them from)... just as USA core (imperial) elite is undermined by its eclipse by global finance.........

.....this is why it is impossible for the megastates to eclipse USA as a new core military plutocratic power, (as USA formerly eclipsed Britain)... so military plutocratic power pathology compels these 2 megastates along with USA (& also Japan/ proxy elites); to engineer wars/ pretexts to justify their remaining in control of the geo pol/econ agenda; even to the extent of destroying the world (just to retain, control for as long as it takes to destroy it).

(We deal with the apocalyptic issues related to the collapse of the Russian compradorist regime in `Intro to Quantum Materialism' & `Substance Over Form', but as the global coup has dramatically given USA Caesarism aggressive command of/ a pretext to control the geo pol/econ agenda, we must adapt our strategy/ gameplan to the framework of imminent/ actual USA nuclear terror, rather than risk being conceptually outgunned)

As clearly, capitalism could only be saved from itself by the tough love of the working classes, this begs the Q, WHY on earth did they time & again fail so miserably to assume overlordship, to the extent that organised labor has been wiped out by the power of global finance…
What happened to laborism/ Marxism illustrates its limitations as a reactive force…

…Eg equality as an end in itself, is self evidently the most unviable of options – lacking the social econ glue/ allegiances organically present in the 10,000 year old war/ finance nexus…

…therefore as noted equality cannot be stabilized as an end in itself, only as a means to an end, to enable education of everyone vis (to deal with) overarching culture of the common threats/ objectives confronting all humanity…

…which paradoxically requires the contempory apocalyptic threats arising from the final exhaustion of all organic/ latent potential for development on the basis of hegemony of finance over civil society, of matter over consciousness; to enable the level of desperation required to forge both new global security architecture & the new geo constitutional/ cultural agenda based on enabling humanity to gain mastery of universal time, become God & visit the same crap on the next cosmic generation (as per the Universalist Conception)…

Then WHY was the Russian revolution even possible???

......in the case of Russia/ USSR (In 1917)....

(understanding how/ why USSR collapsed & how this relates to the military plutocracy's inability to reconfigurate/ reform itself in response to a radical shock is key to understanding how/ why the Revolution can seize control of the global military pol/econ agenda & why it couldn't before)

....The inability of landlordist capitalism to confer on itself parliamentary legitimacy (via elections) due to the land/ war Qs (unlike German, French, British counterparts etc) meant the soviet was the only bearer of political legitimacy.

Correspondingly (unlike in the west), the Bolsheviks could simply lie their way to power by pretending things would be hunky dory `Peace, Bread & Land' to win soviet legitimacy.

....finishing of Russian landlordism, but simultaneously & inevitably paralysing the Revolution in the west by re-inforcing the same ineffectual classical laborist mode as before...

...as radicals blinded by the Russian Revolution to the need to combine a rev reconstructionist pol/econ framework with rev pol campaign to delegitimise the Euro finance capitalist regimes, buttressed by participation in elections to prevent the regime re-legitimising itself/ squeeze its position continuously

(a campaign held together by hunger strikes of antifascist PoWs - such as would have been viable in the contempory situation had not September 11th raised the stakes & forced the Revolution to raise them again likewise/ recalibrate its' operational strategy accordingly; to simultaneously take on ALL apocalyptic threats from all quarters in an operationally integrated framework –

To see the various pre & post Sept 11th 2001 rev paradigms, see `Substance Over Form’ vols I-IV, included in Lucifer2.1.zip

A point of interest, to illustrate how ideas evolve with wider geo pol/econ potentiality; even after Sept 11th 2001, as the USA was preparing for the Iraq war, we could NOT have committed to a Jerusalem centred gameplan UNTIL the USA definitively committed on the rgound & therefore the quagmire was inevitable)

…u nable to win power,

.....though the residual strength of the British/ French nation states/ empires was also an insurmountable problem in the way of forging a Euro Commonwealth of the regions (by locking radicalism within the operational framework of the nation state),

& as German radicals could not consolidate a Marxist/ Stalinist framework (nor the new model rev theory), by default control of the military pol/econ agenda went to the political warlordist Nazis (backed by German military plutocracy as the only way open to them to try & retain control of the military pol/econ agenda).

......until, USA & contempory finance, out of the goodness of their hearts, did us the enormous favor of reducing Britain to a semi colonial outpost; which ENABLES the British to lead the Euro Revolution (defining Europe as a bulwark against USA apocalyptic expansionism, freeing USA visionary expansionism…), as nukes notwithstanding, we (in Britain) are too piddling to be a threat to anyone but ourselves.

- they also lacked the threat of nuclear oblivion to drive a reconstructionist Rev pol/econ framework forward,

& every christ needs its' anti-christ).

The latent potential of USA led capital did the rest, its latent strength/ capacity to absorb the radical geo shock (of Russian Revolution/ USSR expansion into Eastern Europe post WWII/ growth of Communist parties geo politically) enabled post WWII reform/ reconfiguration of global pol/econ after fascism in west Europe had driven down wages, providing the foundation for a longwave boom (propelled further by long term rising wages) after its defeat.

(Historically, reccessionary long term falls in wages, combined with radical upsurge, stimulated reforms/ reconfiguration of the global pol/econ, which led to a long term increase in wages/ real as opposed to speculative demand: eg the repeal of the corn laws to cut the ground from rev anti landlordist Chartism in 1847, combining colonial expansion with toleration of trade union bargaining in the 1890s, but post WWI, ONLY the USA vis FDR was strong enough to reform/ reconfigurate its own pol/econ in response to the internal shock of Huey P. Long's `Share the Wealth' movement & therefore LEAD geo politically, the reform of global military plutocracy).

Stalinism: the direct product of collapse of landlordist capitalism combined with the bolsheviks lie/ failure to pre-educate urban masses on need for sacrifices for reconstruction....

....their consequent failure to use the kulaks to eliminate the middle peasantry & in turn tax them to the hilt for primary accumulation (civil society control of the econ through socialist finance, instead of party control via the police)...

....(BOTH) resulting in reactionary egalitarian chaos (consumption of surplus product for subsistence instead of investment) which could only be stabilised by nat sec state repression, justified by external enemies/ threats, a framework which enabled cycles of partial reform of the system (development of a reconstructionist agenda/ primary accumalation for investment/ development) while the Stalinist national security elites retained control of the agenda (helped by very real external threats)....

Stalinism depended on a combination of the nat sec state excuse AND on geo room for bargaining/ growth within/ subordinate to GLOBAL capitalist hegemony precisely BECAUSE laborism dependant on room for bargaining between capital & labor, could not overthrow capitalism in the core states – to enable socialist democracy to eclipse Stalinism…

(USA capitalism for its part could not crush USSR without crushing internal laborism, which there was no overwhelming drive to do for as long as internal radicalism could be absorbed by reforms granted via dynamic reconfiguration of the global capitalist pol/econ in response to radical shocks - as it was unnecessary/ not generally worth the core elite's while to do so)…

......But, when the post war boom strengthened the hand of Black radicalism in USA, the threat of a connexion with working class whites etc,

the USA union leaders did not set up their own labor party as it would have been flooded by blacks taking it in a revolutionary direction, out of their control

The legacy of slavery/ civil war/ segregation being that wheras the state had legitimacy for whites, for blacks this was not the case; therefore USA blacks initial political engagement tended to be revolutionary. Even where as in the South, Martin Luther King leant on a liberal section of the state for support vis civil rights campaign……This inexorably tipped over into a push for economic justice/ democracy – which furthermore challenged the legitimacy of the entire USA led geo pol/econ military plutocratic framework eg vis Vietnam war; with revolutionary implications – immediately prior to his assassination/ corresponding eclipse of civil rights movement by the Black Panther Party……& this corresponding absence of a USA labor party, because racialised class pressures/ divisions were/ are so acute, meant classical bourgeois democracy (in USA) very weak & unable to rule through parliamentary parties without an independent (presidential) strongman to pose as arbiter between the classes.…

But, there was (vis HP Long) scope for a presidential figure to seek & acquire an alternative (anti regime) power base (leaning on civil society in a struggle with regime) – linking a presidential figure/ campaign with an ever increasingly radicalised civil society… - as HP Long did vis his `Share the Wealth’ campaign (in the context of the Great Depression) that began in the poorer backward states (especially Louisiana) in deep south (against Louisiana gentry) that as of necessity (to accomplish/ entrench its anti landlordist tasks) increasingly (broadened its’ base by) attacking hegemonic finance capital throughout the USA – which though was still strong enough (in USA) vis FDR’s leadership, to reform itself in response to such a revolutionary shock; & was done so by giving the New Deal teeth.

Q WHY was there not another HP Long?

Such potential was largely (though not entirely) eclipsed by the cold war (Earl K Long being the dynastic exception that proved the rule). Eg `are you a communist’ would have been more deadly than in the America of the great depression, prior to the post WWII national security state.

….this triggered a geo pol/econ clampdown....

....the Vietnam war (military plutocracy could not pull out of Vietnam until Blacks crushed by Cointelpro, covert intelligence program, preventing a fusion with white working class), in order to make safe the...

shift to a speculative finance/ credit expansionary based economy, preserving the independance of capital from civil society control in the context of ever diminishing room for bargaining between capital & labor - which found political expression in the Thatcher/ Reagan axis,

Eg (under cover of the Vietnam war) this political crisis, was actually resolved through the geo economic crisis.....

…Eg USA came of the gold standard, but maintained its position as global reserve currency by fixing a secret deal with the medievalist Arab sheiks by offering `protection’ in return for all oil deals being charged in dollars – `this gave the USA an unlimited credit card’ - the basis for long term credit expansionary boom; which also financed the USA war machine which in turn protected the USA’s unlimited credit card…

The rise in oil prices as a result of the war in the mideast (between Israel & Egypt) & aforementioned dollar weakness/ long term boom creating shortages/ strengthening the hand of the oil producer states in relation to the USA/ core states....

The core problem is that the war/ finance nexus (military plutocracy) reigns as a law unto itself, making it impossible to establish political economic mechanisms to guide development, to meet long term threats to human survival in a concerted way (eg resource oil shortages/ environmental impact of genetic engineering from biocorps beholden to no-one but their shareholders & even the much bigger projects/ threats posed by climatic change....)

......which impact of led to capital eclipsing the USA core empire....& therefore meant that USA radical forces were outflanked by switch to credit/ speculative expansion....

(which meant that while USA radical forces were trashed, there were enough of USA civil society profiting from this system to keep USA regime stable while the radicals could be outflanked/ crushed under cover of ideological `anticommunism'/ Vietnam war)

...(eg the petrodollars flooded back into USA fuelling longwave credit/ speculative expansion.... & in turn recycled to Latin America dictators/ which came back as capital flight plunder, facilitating USA led military plutocratic loansharking (ratcheting up of interest rates to astronomical levels) their systemic passing costs of crisis onto 3rd world..... - as Joseph Stigliz ex World Bank Chief now admits was the role of his organisation....

- also of note is that this (interest rate trap) was the original cause of Yugoslavia's disintegration... growing debt led to tensions between the republics, & ultimately the desperate playing of the nationalist card in a desperate attempt by the elites to retain control of the pol/econ agenda.... this is analysed in Vol I Chapter 7 of S.O.F.)......

& Reaganite war boom ....

....the REAL objective of the Vietnam war was to keep USA Black & White divided to stabilize USA led military plutocracy & this the enemy accomplished/ won…

furthermore the slaughter of 6 million Vietnamese so raised the costs of rebellion against the USA imperium, that this in turn further aided the development of export led geo strategic buffer states especially in east Asia further hemming in the USSR.

These factors led to the strengthening of USSR’s parasitic military bureaucratic elite & its’ corresponding internal econ collapse…

…what insured this collapse took place in a controlled fashion was the exhaustion of the credibility of the USSR elite by the trap set for them by the USA in Afghanistan…

Eg the corresponding collapse of credibility of USSR regime, producing a temporary, but decisively fatal, popular infatuation with all things western – specifically economic ideology, which gave power (control of the pol/econ agenda) to a class of oligarchical resource compradors, who in spite of rapidly growing unpopularity, were able to retain control by virtue of the fact that the newly (& temporarily) politically enfranchised Russian civil society were reluctant to get too close to the old soviet managers to oppose increasingly fascist compradors…

Eg even in the context of Yeltsin’s 1993 coup (as it was unfolding), Yeltsin retained just enough credibility as a democrat, for there to be just enough of a drag factor on the accummalation of support for Rutskoi/ Khasbulatov (leaders of Parliament against Yeltsin’s coup), for Yeltsin to be able to set a trap by lifting the police cordon, so that under their own undisciplined momentum, the (still) inadequate base of support would attempt to launch a premature insurrection – enabling Yeltsin to crush it with scarcely loyal troops.

But even if parliament had been able to restrain its supporters from taking the bait, had instead patiently martialed their forces (prior to restoring constitutional authority)…

…a military bureaucratic elite would if only be reluctant geo pol/econ default have resecured control of the internal geo pol/econ agenda as result of fears (& of course machinations to so trap them) of western geo political expansionism in the former Yugoslavia & elsewhere – which would have led to collapse/ compradorism again by a more convoluted route…

…the Chechen wars correspondingly were about burning of any threat from either the right (a la Hitler/ Zhirinovsky)or (more probably) the institutional progressive left (General Alexander Lebed) by deliberately degrading the army so as to prevent it functioning either as a fascist/ warlordist expansionist threat or (more likely a) powerbase against compradorism…

…Eg by time Yeltsin’s democratic credentials lost, it was too late, as able to retain power by sheer inertial default – for oligarchical compradorism…

…Eg USA backed Islamic tribal fascists/ warlords in a way deliberately calculated to lure in the USSR – anxious to prevent not merely collapse of a friendly govt (that also upheld women’s rights etc), but the threat of Islamic fascism gaining such critical momentum that USSR’s nukes in Central Asia be over-run by Islamic fascist warlords – designed to turn Afghanistan into USSR’s Vietnam – so that regime authority flaked away as it (had no choice but to) fought a losing battle to raise the costs of such ventures sufficient to prevent geo psycho political momentum leading Islamic fascists over-running USSR’s Central Asian nukes…

Critical to this USA orchestrated campaign was the strategic depth of this campaign – based on USA’s historic alliance with Islamic fascism…

Eg as mideast was not their backyard (like Latin America) necessity compelled them to lean on authentic independent/ autonomous forces…

Unlike in Latin America, where axis of military fascist compradors, landlords & colonial multinationals could hire the thugs required & employ the tactical expertise/ resources necessary to maintain control…

…Paradoxically also having a shared Christian culture meant such was less effective as an agency of control – as such would be too transparent a means of control, so that paradoxically gave rise to Liberation Theology as a way to define seperateness from colonial overlords

Furthermore (as noted) the geo historical culture (of the Islamic world) was highly conducive to such – as the cultural vortices of Mecca/ Medina were too big for any single (rather weak) nation states to control, hence the Saudi Royal/ Islamic fascist clerical axis, to cover their flank against a milinairist convergence…

Q Why was Rome not similarly susceptible to such a millenialist convergence???

As already noted (vis conflict over control over Holy Sepulchre between different Christian factions – contained by Muslim gatekeepers) the centre of power of Christendom (vis Church) lies in Jerusalem…

…as evinced by the Crusades & popes attempts to garner power by promoting such – however as this is the flashpoint between 3 geo cultures, it is less viable as a reliable source of power than Mecca was (in the Islamic world).

So that without reliable control of the cradle of Christian ideology, the church could not ideologically eclipse the power of the nation state as was seen as the mere tool of national interests, wether the Italianate Princes, Spain or France…

This made Islamic fascism/ millennialism a powerful geo political weapon vis anticommunism…

Not only in Afghanistan (with Saudis paying regular danegeld to such to wage their campaigns outside of Saudi Arabia) & correspondingly the Pakistan of general Zia, the use of such by Anwar Sadat against leftists in Egyptian universities, by Israel’s Shin Bett against secular Palestinian radicals, an earlier anti communist alliance in Iran that deposed Mossadegh as premier (until the excesses of the Shah so offended Iranian national consciousness that this became untenable for clerics seeking to retain infleuence over their people) & other such…

But at a price, which was that as Islamic fascists hated the result of their alliance with the USA (arising from the conduct of both), & as such was obviously not their fault, this deepened their antipathy to USA – a growing pestilential cult of psycho political transference…

…manifesting itself as a number of levels, including increased power/ infleuence for Islamic fascists/ repression of women; particularly lack of access to birth control – leading to a horrendous demographic crisis/ increasing/ entrenching poverty which broadens/ deepens the culture of psycho political transference…

…leading ultimately to Sept 11th 2001 (with a number of precursor attempts)…

& the current (as at 26/2/06) dance of death between a USA regime seeking to prop up the petrodollar (maniacally threatening anyone & everyone, not just overthrowing Saddam Hussein, fixing a war with Iran; but even Venezuela has come into USA regime’s bombsights)/ sleepwalking into via its’ narrative concept of `America’s manifest destiny to lead the world to the kingdom of Christ’; into `preparing the way for the `Rapture’ (whereupon our Lord & Saviour returning to glory on a mushroom cloud shall deliver up our apple pie munching bretheren & smite the rest of us); & clashing with their counterparts in the Islamic world (eg the Iranians awaiting the 12th Imam) to help prop up the petrodollar/ OR bring on the Rapture. Whatever.

The Q of USA backing for Israeli expansionism, in this ergard has a double character…

…on the one hand it does represent a fundamental general & indeed legitimate fear that if not stood up to, if the issue is ignored, no Arab land is sacrosanct from colonial plunder/ outright theft…

…which has fed into the logic of national security state regimes that could be played of against each other…

Such as USA/ Saudi’s encouraging Saddam Hussein (originally aided by CIA as the alternative to Iraqi Communists consolidating power) to invade the Shat Al Arab waterway – leading to 1 million dead in Iran/ Iraq war (& curiously also the national security consolidation against Iranian leftist by the theocrats), but requiring such increased production of oil as to lower the price of oil – resolving the oil crisis for the USA led geo pol/econ regime…

& in this context (after Iran/ Iraq war) April Glaspies’ comments about USA `not getting involved in Arab border disputes’ when Saddam Hussein complained about Kuwait drilling/ stealing oil from under Iraqi borders’ sub strat, would certainly be consistent with USA imperial interests vis a strategy of containment of Iraq to prevent any, especially a nuclear power emerging in the region which could threaten USA interests – by so provoking Iraq into invading Kuwait as to give a pretext for USA to maintain imperial hegemony…

But it also represents a kind of political adolescence, that serves as an excuse for not addressing mideast disunity (especially between Sunni & Shia), the need for a secularised progressive vision/ women’s rights/ education/ power to stabilise the apocalyptic demographics; & above all using in a cencerted fashion, the oil card as a lever to engineer such…

…but, as the whole world (including/ epecially the west) has (as noted) an adolescent attachment to apocalyptic threats/ WMD etc, it is perhaps appropriate, that the Palestine Q can only be resolved by using it as the conduit to forge the new global security architecture enabling the resolution of such threats - & that this process be led by an elderly adolescent (yours truly)

Whence, at the battle of Jerusalem, humanity, with the mothers as the moral vanguard eclipsing/ resolving the paradox of arm, takes ownership & responsibility for their revolution & their world…

As at 14/8/05 the entire system has long been entirely contingent on massive USA expansion of USA budget/ trade deficit to fuel this process & the Asian exporters (including/ especially China) being willing to underwrite USA’s deficits because if they do otherwise the entire system will crash instantaneously into the abyss)…

…leading to manifest crises of overproduction/ falling rate of profit, due to production outstripping real demand, catalysing (with rising unemployment) a further collapse of real demand, (frenetically competitive) soaring interest rates (to try to prop up the currencies), hyperinflation & the aforementioned geo pol/econ tailspin….

To illustrate the truly remarkable way the rust has held the system together for so long, what strengthened this perverse arrangement was how, in the early 90’s, interest rates came down dramatically, when the class struggle appeared decisively won by the elites, further enabling the shift to a combo of ever looser credit expansion & corresponding over accumalation in the emergent markets…

…Eg beforehand. The weapon of high interest rates was an organic weapon/ mechanism to deter political intervention by the state keen to arbitrate between interests of capital & labor; or even compel finance to subordinate itself to the interests of civil society

& when President Clinton attempted to clip back the budget deficit, weakening demand for East Asian goods, the result was the SE Asian crisis of 1998, triggering organic switch of hot money to the dollar as a so called safe haven currency, which organically fuelled a new wave of USA import led credit expansionary boom…

Eg the underlying logic being, if the arse falls off the dollar, this will trigger such a geo pol/econ tailspin, that the consequent soaring interest rates/ global credit crunch/ hyperinflationary death spiral means that no other currency can be a `safe haven’.

Indeed the fact that the USA is now propped up by the fact that the dollars fall (vis trade/ budget deficit – generated speculative finance/ credit expansion) creates expectation of higher interest rates & therefore dampens demand/ price of oil/ causing a contra tendancy for the dollar to rebound; therefore temporarily stabilising the inexorable (general) propensity to eventual dollar collapse catalysing soaring interest rates, global credit crunch/ hyperinflation & corresponding apocalyptic geo pol/econ tailspin (including in the mideast)…

…Is sufficient to demonstrate that USA nuke attack against Iran would not enable a temporarily stabilised nuke terrorist control of the geo pol/econ agenda, merely trigger (the final) geo pol/econ meltdown/ historical electrocution in any case…

…as we shall see later, this fact is the one factor that will give humanity a small window of opportunity to seize command of its own destiny when geo pol/econ meltdown does occur…

… if we fail to exploit it to the full, then from a variety of apocalyptic standpoints we face collective annihilation…

Before we move onto the phenomenon of Sept 11th 2001 & the consequent geo pol/econ paradox of apocalyptic stability, we should clarify why neither China nor India nor anyone else, can lead a new rev reformist reconfiguration of the global military plutocratic system…

in the way outlined earlier to recap:

1) The British by repealing the corn laws in 1847 (in response to the revolutionary threat from Chartism) enabled cheap imported grain to increase both domestic & foreign purchasing power/ increased demand for British manufactures & a multiplier effect of consequent rising long term wages leading to rising real demand/ longwave econ boom until approx 1870…

2) Whence market saturation led to a longwave fall in wages leading to political/ general union radicalism – which was resolved by a combo of colonial expansion into/ carve up of Africa, creating the economic space (vis expanded markets) to increase wages…

…the internal brittleness of the European states, their diminishing capacity for reform/ rising laborist expecting squeezing the nation state elites, pushing them into the 1914-1945 conflict…

NB* only in Russia did a laborist revolution take power, because only in Russia did the land war/ political legitimacy Q merge in such a fashion that elections were not possible for fear of a general land war, destroying elites outright, which meant only the soviet held political legitimacy & therefore could take power just by promising `peace, bread, land – not possible in the parliamentary states where the land, war, political legitimacy Q did not fuse so starkly…

…After which only the USA (reforming itself internally vis FDR’s NEW Deal given teeth in response to the revolutionary shock of Huey P Longs’ `Share the Wealth’ movement) was capable of leading the global rev reform of the military plutocratic system – in response to radical shock of USSR’s westward expansion…

…which led us to the internal crisis vis rise of black radicalism threatening to merge with white labor & need for its repression under cover of the Vietnam war & switch to a speculative finance based credit expansionary system.

…For when the USA was a rising power, it was stabilised by the vast opportunities afforded by the ethnic cleansing of the original inhabitants combined with waves of cheaper immigrant labor filling up the vast spaces of an essentially imperial enterprise (believing ever more in its manifest destiny)…

…it also acted as stabiliser of the British/ European nation states, by functioning as an alternative to frustration/ political dissent in said old countries…

This is not the case with extremely brittle megastates of China & India – for whom because of their sheer size, as they acquire a certain degree of strength come to be seen by their own people as the main threat to their interests/ security (rather than any other foreign state) & which modern states came into being as specifically 3rd world national liberationist entities – in which capitalism cannot rule in its own name without this catalysing said explosive dynamic even earlier…

In China (formerly part of the core radical grouping to break away from imperial control – to establish the contempory state; & now in a paradoxical sense BOTH an ideologically 3rd world socialist state AND the last & greatest of the USA enabled buffer states to socialist expansion), Chinese capitalism cannot even rule in its own name & so the more it develops, the more it must depend upon nationalism as a dangerous means to try & maintain control of the internal geo pol/econ agenda – just as USA does the same as it loses imperial control (in a way analogous to the way that limited pre WWII Chinese development caused japan to take fright & launch a pre-emptive colonial assault); in both USA & china leading to geo pol/econ & social liquifaction – were this process not cut across by collapse of USA credit expansionism beforehand…

Wheras in India, it was only the eclipse of the USSR, that cut across India’s socialist fuedalist paradigm, that combined 3rd world nationalist ideology, workers’ interests with those of feudal landlords…

…that (for geo cultural/ political reasons, including the need to match China) similarly allowed Indian capitalism to develop…

Eg post WWII (after independence won from a weakened Britain, handing over power to avoid India lining up with the core radical bloc etc) India’s centripetal tendancies held in check by combo of this 3rd wordlist ideology & the fact that to develop either a socialist bloc program or baldly pro USA approach would have led to superpower engagement/ support on either side, which would so obviously have led to the self defeating ruination of the objective, that a decisive consensus could never be found to advance such causes (rendering them inherently abortive). Hence post independence, socialist feudalism held India together by sheer inertia…

&, the collapse of this consensus (with collapse of the USSR) while unleashing the latent power of Indian capitalism, means that as the Dalits also increasingly begin to see Indian megastate capitalism (elites in general especially landlords – vis the explosive land Q merging with the megastate Q vis elites being seen) as the MAIN enemy of their own people/ interests. In turn unleashing a new (or reconstituted/ much more powerful) explosive ideology, in a self defeating attempt to assert a new Indian nationalist identity/ vision – in the form of Hindu fascist RSS/BJP/VHD; which threatens to blow India/ subcontinent (& the world) to smithereens…

…unless checked by the geo strategic framework outlined earlier…

Correspondingly, the effect of Sept 11th2001 destruction of the World Trade Centre….

By the USA’s old Islamic fascist allies, who because they could not in any way be to blame for the state of their countries they had held back/ trashed in their joint war with USA against secular socialist forces, attacked the USA in an act of psycho political transference

…was to actually (temporarily) stabilise the USA speculative finance/ credit expansionary regime by enabling the `war on terror’ to provide sufficient psycho political firebreaks on the pol/econ agenda, that the scandals of the ENRON affair did not generate their own irresistible dynamic & catalyse the crash of the entire system (which given the enormous budget/ trade deficit – $7 Trillion & $700 Billion annualised respectively - was otherwise sufficiently ripe for)…

However, as USA imperial prestige demanded that for every USA citizen killed in WTC attack, that many more brown people pay a higher price in blood & treasure, bombing the mountains (& already heavily bombed out) lands of Afghanistan was clearly insufficient. Only an attack on Iraq could restore USA imperial credibility. Never mind Saddam Hussein’s hostility to Al Qaeda (in contrast to claims they were allied), never mind that the worst crimes (Iran/ Iraq war & Halabja massacre) that Saddam Hussein’s regime committed were largely commissioned by USA/ its’ allies , & no one had stood trial for such in the west. Or that the USA’s moral credibility as owner of 10,000 nukes & policeman of WMD looks inadequate.

Imperial credibility was at stake. Was the USA the world’s only superpower or not? & if so, it had to put up. To do otherwise would have led the geo political piranha to smell blood, so only by creating a quagmire in Iraq could the situation be temporarily stabilised.

Of course oil was the second of 3 factors ( the most sinister, USA Rapture psychology we shall deal with later). But even this factor, its apparent thinly disguised covert character had a reassuringly practical/ sane if not very legal/ moral appearance to it – much more worrying being the character of the other 2 factors woven into this covertly overt factor…

Even then, at the time I expected proxy forces to be used, as the USA was chased out of Lebanon back in 1983 by a single truck bomber. The outcome appeared so insanely predictable I doubted even George bush would commit to such an obvious cataclysm…

So in conclusion, the epoch of collapsing USA led global speculative finance/ credit expansionism, is simply the final manifestation of automatic linear evolutionary development vis (on basis of) the hegemony of matter/ finance over human consciousness/ global civil society…

…but to understand what is required of/ for humanity to avoid oblivion/ transcend the corresponding apocalyptic epoch, we need to first understand (in greater depth) how the decisive/ pivotal historic factor, our free will borders the limits of automatic development (on basis of hegemony of matter/ finance over human consciousness/ global civil society)…

…How, as a default setting, we are:

##### 5 Programmed For self Destruction

Intelligent life, with the capacity to become a deity (& visit the same crap on the next cosmic generation)…

…emerged out of pondscum, ultimately overpopulated the natural economy, causing it to resort to settled agriculture which thence had to be defended…

…which in turn impelled weapons technology (especially metallurgy), complex forms of social pol/econ organisation (social stratification) – the consequent enslavement of humanity before the first great machine it had ever created, the war/ finance nexus…

The consequent (linear evolutionary/ automatic development of) hegemony of matter/ war/ finance nexus over human consciousness/ (global) civil society…

…is most starkly reflected in (Judeo Christian Islamic) Christian legend of `The Fall’…

(The most noteworthy primordial manifestation of the subordination of consciousness to matter) … that (as) even, especially the light bearer (`Lucifer’) was cast out for rebelling against God (vis encouraging man to seek independant knowledge of good & evil), that demonstrably humanity cannot save itself by its own autonomous revolutionary initiative, but must instead wait for external divine intervention… this legend is the geo psycho political caldera of the entire Judaeo – Christian – Islamic world. & it is in this geo psycho political setting that the fate of all humanity will be decided more than anywhere else in the context of the unfolding global pol/econ implosion of the war/ finance nexus.

..... that in order to physically as well as intellectually preserve/ restore/ extend light in both forms (electrical & intellectual), humanity must exploit the chaos/ fear engendered by the final collapse of military plutocratic system to push a rev geo pol/econ framework (which we outlined in `Battle of Jerusalem') enabling it to gain hegemony over its own creation (consciousness gaining hegemony over matter...) vis not only a culture of common threats/ objectives confronting all humanity (especially in immediate term, to develop sustainable energy sources - aided by civil society control of finance/ its own creation - humanity no longer subordinate to the war/ finance nexus) – but the overarching Universalist Conception – that (in the context of the new global security architecture) the global pol/econ constitutional framework must be geared towards enabling humanity to master its own time so that it can understand/ master the unwritten universal constitution of universal time per se....

The very beginings of this new pol/econ culture are to be found in the hope that comes from the beginnings of a viable strategy/ methodology to deal with said apocalyptic threats - under pressure of said threats. Representing the pivotal point in history, the precise point at which human consciousness begins to assert its hegemony over matter/ finance/ its' own creation (hence to name `Lucifer2.zip' - an aggressive refusal to submit to our primordial original fear - expressed in the legend of `The fall', but to exploit the chaos to seize command of our own destiny)…

....to break our own programming & seize command of our own destiny (through the methods outlined in ` Battle of Jerusalem' in `Lucifer2.zip'- refer back to as required)

…which defined the hope of salvation in Christianity…

…emerging amidst the despair of slaves, in an all powerful Roman empire & based on nothing but a desperate hope in an afterlife & a willingness to die for such – so impressing the Roman elite, that such percolated upwards until it had formal power…

…so that even though certainly subordinate to Roman power, the logic levers of the war/ finance nexus, as Rome crumbled

Over whelmed by the frontiers tribes stimulated to/ forced to band together in ever larger more effective formations for defense (against the Roman empire) seeking plunder/ tribute

…the church based on a transcendent vision, was still able to spread its infleuence in ways not open to imperial legions alone (though often the 2 went hand in hand – including successor figures like Charlemagne) – let alone the old tribal/ national Gods of Roman/ pre Roman times…

…thus this remnant of Rome, provided the supranational basis/ framework for (post Roman) feudal Europe…

The church serving as a medium for the supranational transmission of education, culture, bureaucracy – an aid to the fragmentation of power in Europe, between Kings, barons the Church & increasingly finance; necessary to insure the process of capital accummalation was not under the control of a single plundering Caesarist entity…

…so that capital accummalation could take place under more dynamic/ flexible circumstances…

While other states/ empires may have been far more advanced, providing knowledge for Europe’s development, & been better at war or finance, no state was better at combining the 2 over an extended timeframe than Europe (aided by fragmentation of power – enabled by the supranational framework of the Church/ Christian ideology)

…the centre of gravity shifting from the Italianate cities to Conquistador Spain to mercantile Holland & then finally mercantile England/ Britain. Protestantism increasingly emerging as a national religion functioning as a lever enabling capital to break from the power of the old feudal supranational catholic framework (yet without being subject to the control of any caeasr because of the still continuing fragmentation of power in Europe)…

…So that in this shifting process finance ceased to serve the (feudal) sword, rather the (state) sword increasingly served the interests of finance…

…a point reached decisively at the beginning of the English civil war when Parliament refused King Charles demand for war taxes unless it be given control of the army…

…hereonin, the merchants being the decisive consolidating power in the land. As equality as an end in itself be the most unstable/ unviable of all systems/ concepts leading to overturn, overturn, overturn, lacking the organic drive/ glue of the war finance nexus

as opposed to equality as a means to an end to enable education to deal with common threats/ objectives confronting all humanity which as we have seen…..

which possessed the power to break any power that sought to generally assault its interests…

…in turn increasingly dependant on classical rationalism/ materialism (& which increasingly ceased to require aid from movements based on Utopian visions) to flesh out its interests (including as we have seen the threat of revolution)…

Ultimately, the single mercantile superpower (England/ Britain) was prevented from being able to develop caesarist ambitions by the European fragmentation of power, eg French revanchist support for the American revolution – checking any possibility at all of passing costs of falling rate of (British) mercantile profit onto American colonists – being the classic example; awash with correspondingly cheap capital, had by default no choice but to find an outlet for that capital in industrial investment (aided by profitable forced trade with the Indian subcontinent – restricting domestic producers)…

…a process further catalysed by (leading to longwave boom) by internal political repression in the wake of the French revolution (France having bankrupted itself by revanchist support for the American colonists – having been defeated by Britain in the battle for control of colonies/ markets in the Seven Years War); whilst simultaneously a modern industrial middle class/ skilled workforce provided a prop of social differentiation/ stability against the new industrial proletariat…

…this first longwave econ boom of modern industrial capitalism, was dependant upon repression rather than the institutionalisation of labor, in many respects resembling in such fashion the last globally self destructive USA led speculative finance/ credit expansionary based boom…

…a historical pointer (as sunrise is to sunset) to the present final exhaustion of linear automatic development based on the hegemony of matter/ finance over human consciousness/ global civil society…

…& the need therefore, to break our programming for self destruction, through a new transcendant vision, (the universalist conception that defines that the written secular constitution must be calibrated to give people ever more control of their time, to understand the unwritten universal constitution – gain mastery of God’s time per se) calibrated (not to an afterlife but) dealing with multiple apocalyptic dynamics/ threats, we shall now outline further…

## The Global Peasant War

Paradoxically, the geo pol/econ outline of our salvation is to be found precisely in apocalyptic threats unleashed by the war/ finance nexus vis its’

Organic consumptive patterns of control

The dialectics of resource depletion play an increasingly important geo military pol/econ role.

This is not a coincidence, but built into the very process of geo pol/econ linear development/ evolution of the war/ finance nexus…

- At the macro & micro level, consumption functions as a destructive productive means of control (by USA led war/ finance nexus). Eg as an organic process by cconsuming resources/ land etc, you exerted power/ control at the micro & macro level, preventing adversaries individual & macro political, making use of them (Godfather III - `Your enemies grow strong on what you leave behind’)…

And post WWII, this formerly incipient dialectic came into its own as a decisive factor in its own right.

Firstly as a (molecular & macro) block against revolution

This is also why USA helped buffer states to develop as a geo pol/econ bulwark against spread of USSR bloc post WWII.

Secondly (after threat of revolt subsided) through sheer inertial (& hubristic post cold war continuing) momentum.

& the psycho political impact of defeat of progressive nationalist resistence in the cold war.

(Role of Vietnam war in terrorising resistence `destroying countries to save them’ to raise prohibitively the costs of doing so)

…Combined with the cultural/ techno/ corporate expansionism necessary to re-inforce/ consolidate such

including (as a largely organic more than conspiratorial process) to sell the western consumerist vision

The fact that in certain areas of the world, eg Africa, the sheer geographic vastness/ impenetrability, means the whole world (to develop such) must proceed beyond imperial consumptive patterns of development (indeed as we have seen, later exploit the chaos arising from geo pol/econ breakdown in order to develop the political will) to develop the solar powered desalinatory technology that enables the scale of the undertaking to be accomplished (by strengthening the basic socio econ unit as a freestanding unit largely self sufficient in water, energy & access to info).

This direct imposition of the hegemony/ interests of the first world metropole over the 3rd world (analogous to the way the Roman empire dominated the frontiers – stimulating the development of the very armed formations that over-ran them) has a most curious effect; in that the very structures of imperial control become the very agencies of imperial ruination…

…by those seeking a piece of the pie &/ or to `hit back’ often simultaneously; through insecurity/ instability of supply of key resources, hopelessly unsustainable rates of immigration to the metropole along its own rapid transit systems – as well as through asymmetric warfare…

…which taken together amount in effect to a global peasant war – threatening to over-run the USA led metropolitan core…

### The Crisis of Slavery

This compares starkly with the only other remotely similar process in history, the crisis of slavery:

The crisis of slavery encompassing USA/ Russia/ India/ China (& representing the break up of the ancient world under the impact of the British industrial political economy) illustrates decisively the hitherto geo historical constraints/ lack of options available to states (& radical forces), to break free from the organic control of the 10,000 year old war/ finance nexus, if they wanted to - & in so doing, decisively illuminates the character of the one time opportunity we have to seize our destiny & gain mastery over ourselves…

…paradoxically propelled/ enabled by aforementioned multi faceted MAD threats to enable the threats to be balanced of against each other like bricks in an arch – providing the context for the new geo pol/econ constitutional framework & held together by the overarching cultural vision of the Universalist Conception…

Eg until maximum development of & final exhaustion of capacity for development on basis of the war/ finance nexus, it was impossible to base society on the universalist conception & therefore, defacto subordinate to war/ finance nexus, in latent form if only in the form of decisively unbridled ego….

As in the post Roman era (aided by the fragmentation of power vis the church) Europe increasingly found its true geo cultural boundaries, its true form (vis war/ finance nexus)…

This in turn created opportunities for emergence of & spread of Islamic empire…

…Eg power in the Islamic world was based less than in Europe on a central kingly power holding the balance of power between different baronial factions & corresponding foreign magnates – (the unreliability of desert agriculture did not much lend itself to such) providing framework for emergence of finance over the sword…

…than a more visionary pooling of social – economic risk & therefore an emphasis on central accumalation/ funding of acumalation of knowledge to help alleviate that social & economic risk & corresponding cultural developments…

…which of course found expression in ideological/ geo cultural mores/ literary manifestations of such…

The Koran was the cultural/ programmatic genesis of such a process that fed the European enlightenment/ decisively accelerating its intellectual/ corresponding material development in concert with its demonstrably more resilient & flexible war/ finance nexus (to the point that said process could become self sustaining/ propelled in the emergent mercantile/ industrial world)

Still subordinate to hegemony of matter over consciousness (as then as yet, no terrifying accumalation of military geo pol/econ apocalyptic threats/ capabilities & therefore positive technological corollaries, to enable universalist conception etc)

Hence a tendancy as wealth accumalated, to split into conflicting poles of attraction….

The Abisaids deposing the Ummayads as caliphs (& shifting the capital to Baghdad – to consolidate power); & the Ummayads moving west, to the Iberian peninsula, driving out the Visigoths to establish the nominally subordinate sub Caliphate (nominally loyal to Baghdad); of Al Andaluscia until the Berber fundamentalists decalred themselves rival caliphs forcing Al Andaluscia to either go out of its way to subordinate itself to one or other claiment to the caliphate; or alternatively declare openly what they were defacto; a caliphate in their own right…

This however changed the geo political psycho dynamics completely …

…the bold assertion of contra authority having a number of effects…

Firstly, in setting a precedent (vis usurpation of legitimising authority), making it psycho politically possible for coups to be launched to control Cordoba (capital of Al Andaluscia) – destabilising & ultimately fragmenting the caliphate into 23 city states – following a curiously European pattern of internal geo political fragmentation……

Secondly (because of Al Andalus particular geo political position on borders of Christendom & Islamic world…) in ideologising the region as the principle pole of the Muslim world antagonising the Christians of Al Andaluscia – helping fuel conflict later on…

The caliphate fragmented when one of the pretenders called in Berber fundamentalists to help fight their claim…

…leading over the longer term to fragmentation of Al Andaluscia (decline of Cordoba as the capital 100 years after pronouncement as caliphate)

Q WHY did the lack of central unity better serve Euro Christian model than the Islamic model???

Because such fragmentation of power produced such an emphasis/ premium on the military/ warlordist, as to so corrode the very (cultural/ developmental) strength of the Islamic empire (in Al Andalus) that gave it broader appeal. Meaning it was less well able over time than before to dynamically absorb/ retain new allies/ converts from which Christendom - & therefore lost the geo psychological initiative & became prone to the dynamics of supra (ethno religious) national war (between Christendom & Islam) – from a force which had learnt sufficiently from the Islamic empire to not be seen (at least for long enough to maintain decisive momentum) as such total savages, that they lost/ failed to gain the geo psychological initiative…

…& once underway, this process bcame increasingly irreversible…

Furthermore, as increasing wealth led to decisive fracturing of the Islamic world, the effect of Islamic (fanatic) warlordism was to exacerbate this fragmentary tendancy…

Wheras the European model war/ finance nexus was, as already noted, actually aided in terms of aforementioned geo pol/econ development/ flexibility by its fragmentary dynamic

Eg Spain (Castile/ Aragon etc) ultimately in becoming defined by as expansionist supranational catholic universalist identity…

…vis gold/ silver from the colonies, which enabled it to hold together (albeit at ruinous expense in blood & treasure) an empire in Europe – whilst simultaneously acting as the conduit for capital accumalation/ mercantile development in the rest of Europe (again at Spain’s own expense)

This flexibility of development contrasts with the Islamic empire’s successor’s, the Ottoman empire, which paradoxically was undone by its unity (denying it such organic/ developmental flexibility – yet largely imperative, emerging as it did from the need to pool economic risk in a centralised state as determined by the logic of pol/econ geography – over much of the area of the Ottoman empire)…

the (post 1492) rise of the western war/ finance nexus led eventually to the progressive bottling up/ eclipse of the Islamic empire (its centre shifting from west to east vis the Ottomans)…

…in a way curiously analogous to the way the decline of military plutocratic system (vis USA empire) led to collapse of the USSR; manifest in increasing/ progressive tendancy to ideological/ intellectual stagnation…

…Spain sought & sucked in wealth from the `new world’ to strengthen Spanish control of the increasingly corrupt church – fuelling national (German) demands for a `cheap church’ (& more freedom), the birth of a Protestant ideology which in turn became the rallying cry of merchants seeking leverage away from despotic control – finding its decisive expression in the English revolution.

From the beginning therefore, colonial expansion by European states was bound up with an internecine struggle for survival between European states to avoid such loss of strength as would see them submerged by others – hence competitive expansion in the new world – which in turn gave rise to an independent expansionist logic.

Hence growing out of the soil of Europe, (the struggle for) independence &/ or freedom at home, meant subjegation/ slavery for other peoples abroad…

This raises the Q:

Why was it possible for conquistadors to be able to use indigenous peoples as slaves, but the (largely British) USA settlers wiped out the Native Americans & imported black slaves at great expense???

In the initial period of colonisation, the extent of South American civilisation was its comparative undoing…

…eg the more backward (compared with later colonists) conquistadors…

able to conquer the settled populations by combo of factors. Firstly the superiority of Spanish steel weapons to those made of obsidian (firearms were more used for display violence/ psychological effect – which brings us to) secondly, the desperation of Spanish colonists to make good/ gain their fortune; such therefore insured the colonists attained a weapons grade bastardy by psycho pol/econ natural selection. Which stood them in good stead to take the military psychological initiative with settled peoples – who in turn were not motivated by patriotism, but rather local patriotism, meaning such could also be persuaded upon to join the Spanish in their battles for local geo pol reasons…

…required help/ active co-operation not merely to learn the terrain, but to locate/ exploit the very metallic basis upon which their empire was (at least) initially principally established…

Correspondingly (in terms of both their dependency on the native people as well as Euro Church ideology), the process of cultural legitimation (vis Visigoth Spain) demanded christianisation of (at least some of) the survivors (obviously as the humanitarian objections to the slaughter/ slavery had little practical pol/econ weight in terms of strengthening Spains’ position, they fell by default).

Eg & as a process of geo pol/econ natural selection brought the backward colonies to the richest pickings in terms of gold & later economiendas (the right to levy taxes over a defined area) first…

…it follows that after this came the absorption of land/ other commodities – by those seeking a base of independence from Catholicism especially from England, to which they sought a base for – in order to re-export their revolutionary ideas/ ideology…

So a number of factors determined slavery or annihilation:

Pre-existing development of people – enabling rapid theft of portable wealth – which made more suitable to a relatively backward colonial project – eg Spanish conquistaodors.

& the specific all encompassing ideology of the church demanded souls for the consecration of Spain etc

Wheras the more developed English etc had little need for such, as more inclined to seek to carve out a new world (initially inspired by freedom from catholic domination, but gathering its own independent geo pol/econ expansionist dynamic/ momentum) – so that paradoxically their pursuit of freedom meant they had no use for the (in any case less readily exploitable/ controllable) inhabitants (that the Spanish passed over), so that the biggest (in numerical & expressed as a proportion of the population) genocide (eclipsing Hitler/ Stalin/ even Mao) in all history was committed in the pursuit of freedom….

Hence the importing of slaves into the southern plantations (vis cotton/ sugar etc)…

& the paradoxical ideological/ cultural geo pol/econ faultlines that sprang up around this issue…

As Britain supported their colonies for strategic reasons (& to a certain extent prestige as an end in itself), that correspondingly firmly established same (including their expansionist dynamics), such felt secure enough in their position to seek ever greater freedom from crown control – such that whence attempts made to even begin to pass costs of falling rate of profit onto the colonists AND control their inexorable expansionist drives into native American territory (out of a blend of desire for strategic control/ prevent them becoming too strong and humanitarian concern)…

…The colonists rebelled – backed by the French – driven by revanchist prestige – that if they did not, no one would ever take them seriously again, which would be strategically fatal to their own psychology & (correspondingly) what others could expect to get away with in relation to them…

Initially held together during war of independence by a fudge over `state’s rights’, between slave & free state (dead native Americans notwithstanding)…

Black slavery was both a reassurance of the status of whites & a threat to their liberty vis competition with such (driving down wages etc)…

…added to this the southern states were closer to Britain (to whom they exported `king cotton’) favoring cheap free trade imports – wheras the industrial north favored tarrifs to nurture their industries…

The unfolding crisis of slavery in USA was precipitated by attempts to expand slavery into northern freestates…

A process catalysed by the Mexican war & corresponding compromise to avoid secessionist splits) dividing new states between free & slaveholding, southerners became both more defensive about attempts to deny them access to some new territories whilst simultaneously confident of slavery’s defacto consolidation – eg that formally recognised that be here to stay, which prior to the fudge they were less self assured about…

…therefore looked like weakness from hostile authorities

(prior to this it was America’s vastness that slowed down the showdown until the geo political squares on the chessboard filled up with enough hostile forces/ interests to generate its own psycho political momentum)

The low level civil war fought out between anti slavery activists (eg John Brown et al) & pro slavery forces drilling the political institutional & geo psychology of the 2 camps (& their interests) to the point of all out open conflict vis southern seccession – supported by British cotton interests – in effect a bashful form of colonialism…

…Correspondingly, this part of the crisis of slavery was resolved through consolidation of the union against those forces that in one form & another constituted a threat to the stability of the interests of northern capitalism (& its’ laborist adjunct)

…which both the destabilising attempts to extend slavery (eg in Kansas) a process that flowed inexorably from the institution of slavery itself, necessitating its abolition, & (vis the `40 acres & a mule’ demand) the notion of racial equality which destabilised the gradient of social stratification & therefore military plutocracy itself; yet without the geo cultural conditions enabling the stabilisation of economic equality. Therefore social/ econ & political (& internal/ external imperial) power `found its’ own level’ in the post reconstruction era…

By comparison with this seismic event, the campaign against slavery in British colonies in late 18th – early/ mid 19th centuaries was aimed against increasingly marginal reactionary planter interests, was a key adjunct in the cultural psychology of British political reform – to allow for representation of complex interests – that such represented a bulwark against…

Eg without weakening/ removing the position of such, they would be a (not least a psychological) deadweight against the new pol/econ interests/ constituencies in the new middle/ working classes

Russia was defined by fear of the Mongol horde (& also as custodian of worldview/ orthodox Christianity)…

This in turn, meant Russia had to be so big, which correspondingly meant unlike European states, it had no clear (defacto) conception of fragmentation of power between states…

…& this therefore, produced a more insular perspective as external enemies were less of an everyday threat than in Europe – which (correspondingly) threatened internal civil war to capture the throne…

Therefore the only way to resolve this was (materially) through an expansionist autocracy – with (ideologically) the tsar seen as God’s direct intercessionary on earth (worldview orthodoxy functioning as this ideological mechanism/ support)

Which in turn stabilised the position of landlords over their serfs; in conjunction with the oppression of space decisively diluting the potential for urban development/ markets/ guilds for skilled tradesmen/ merchants to join – which over time would have challenged the power of military feudal landlords/ become a power in its own right…

As (pre Alex II), the comparative historic gravity of the urban centres was thence so weak that there could be no patriotic middle class (as in the English/ American/ French Revolutions) positioned over time to take/ consolidate power/ reconfigurate the state…

…& wheras the French revolution/ sub caesarist Bonaparte forced modernisation upon European states (led by the old elites in alliance with their middle classes as a survival imperative), the reaction to Bonaparte’s invasion of Russia, was simply to burn the capital, withdraw into the vastness of the territory & wait for winter/ the grand armee to starve & cut them to pieces on the retreat…

& as power in essence lay with the landlords, it only lay with the tsar in terms of feudal expansionism (to keep landlordism together)…

…therefore Pugatchev was snatching at a phantom…

…as was the Decembrist rising, which sought a constitutional division of power – without the material basis to consolidate/ bring such about…

With expanding Russian empire positioned as the `gendarme of Europe’ post the 1848 revolutions, to act as a psychological chilling threat/ bulwark against further such, was correspondingly brought into conflict with the deeper geo political/ security interests of Britain/ France as well as Turkey, leading to the Crimean war (to bottle Russia up) – which (so) revealed (to the tsarist central authorities – the successor Alex II) the inadequacy of Russian military economic technical infrastructure…

Therefore (marginal external cultural influences on the elite notwhitstanding) serious attempts at change were (only really) stimulated by the Crimean war, which threatened (vis British expansionism) the fundamental integrity of the inertial expansionist Russian state…

…Eg competition in Central Asia…

Which forced the Russians not merely to open a window on the world (in the spirit of Peter/ Catherine the Great), but actually attempt something resembling fundamental internal restructuring…

Tsar Alex II’s attempt to hothouse the development of a modern Russian bourgeois, by trying to push through the liberation of the serfs(agricultural capitalism to provide funds for industrial investment), tended by & large to both undermine the feudal economy AND create popular & unrealisable expectations of radical reform (much of what was being attempted was frustrated by the landlordist class); which fuelled (in many respects an incendiary) discontent among students/ intelligentsia…

What partially stabilised this process was that once this geo strategic / pol/econ process had begun (assassination of tsar alex II & repression of radicals notwithstanding), given the wider (western) geo pol/econ imperatives could not be stopped…

Especially vis the French defeat in Franco Prussian war, France’s desire for revenge & a partner on Germany’s eastern flank…

…the Russian need for a warm water port in Constantinople/ Istanbul…

Competition for territory vis the decomposing Austro Hungarian empire & related issues of national prestige/ credibility.

But, as the (aforementioned) Russian narrative (required to hold the country together, of orthodox autocracy) would have been undermined by the sort of pol/econ pluralism that a viable Russian capitalism would have required (which is why it was no more than a geo strategic pol/econ compact between the west & Russian autocracy/ landlordism)…

…Largely foreign owned/ stimulated Russian capitalism (lacking at the time the clear & proximite threat of communism on the border to encourage development of the sort of reformist internal/ external geo pol/econ & social coalition to enable it to secure itself by a stable social gradient), therefore got squeezed between the political illegitimacy of landlordism & the emergent working class

Which in the context of the aforementioned political legitimacy crisis of 1917, functioned as the battering ram of a new cultural/ political caste/ bureaucracy able to eclipse/ replace the old Russian narrative (of world orthodoxy) with the new cultural narratives of world socialist Revolution…

…such be the way the crisis of slavery resolved itself in Russia (gulags notwithstanding)…

India

Considering that the greatest superpower in all history, the contempory USA, cannot with all the forces at its disposal, control 3 Sunni held provinces in Iraq totalling 4 million Sunni Arabs…

…a Q arises

HOW the hell did Britain end up controlling the geo pol/econ directly/ indirectly of megastates (possessing artillery & cavalry) India & China (leading to the failed Indian rebellion of 1857 & the failed Taipeng rebellion of 1850-61) with barely 100,000 troops & an advanced navy controlling the destiny of hundreds of millions from thousands of miles away???

Well, in both cases, the very size & (particular forms of) cultural sophistication of both states actually played against them/ made them possible to take over/ manipulate…

WHY did India not have the kind of fragmentation of power/ feudal warlordism that would have caused it to suck in the whole world to enable it to finance its internal wars, WHY did the Indians lack this vision???

Wheras the organic geo pol/econ internal/ external fragmentation of power in Europe is control over land, created the longterm basis for the church (as a supranational ideological/ political arbiter) to further aid this process of power fragmentation (providing supranational ideological framework – giving rise to the later demands for a cheap church) in the post Roman era…

Organic communal control of land in India

(eg unpredictable monsoon culture meant land revenue main lever of econ control in caste based system - as no magnate would wish to expose himself to singular ruination if said monsoon failed)

…meant correspondingly, as the power of religion was too closely allied to central power (in indian state/ empires) for it to have sufficient leverage to play this role to a critical/ sufficient degree…

it either could not spread very far – as an extra territorial framework/ structure, or this in turn meant that as the ideology was not sufficiently independent from control of its imperial patrons, a corresponding demand for a `cheap church’ (or cheap Islam/ Hinduism etc) could not provide a sufficient geo strategic framework (alliance)/ rallying cry to provide (eventual) cover for merchants (in alliance with state then as overlords of such) to break out as an independent power…

(British of course aided by lack of continental engagement)

…India therefore naturally polytheistic…

& for (Euro Christian type) feudalism to work as outlined, it needs to be reasonably well ideologically (vis church framework) & geographically secure in its foundations over a fairly wide area to allow it to function effectively in terms of fragmentation of power…

Eg in India parts may appear (more) suited to a feudal type of system, but as its general culture (subject historically to invaders from across the mountainous northwest) is inclined to military feudalism

Eg the unpredictable monsoon culture meant land revenue main lever of econ control in communal land caste based system - as no magnate would wish to expose himself to singular ruination if said monsoon failed

…upon which, such empires historically sweep across the whole country leaving such a corresponding cultural/ ideological social language as to prevent a feudal/ Christian type framework (capable of combining the type of internal/ external fragmentation of power capable of giving rise to a capitalist system) taking root – so that lacking such geo strategic depth (such as Spain had in reversing the expansion of the Islamic empire); such scarcely able to factor as potential geo cultural pol/econ frameworks…

Allied to this, empires within India tended over time to naturally overstretch to the point that to finance the increasing costs of machinery required to sustain them, they would have to levy such high taxes, that they become internally weakened/ subject to resulting fragmentation…

…in a sense, India was a gigantic empire/ imperial enterprise waiting to happen – as when the Mughals became dependant on the silver stream (indirectly from the new world) via France/ Britain to finance their military state machine…

…providing the colonial powers with a foothold – such that as the empire became still weaker/ more atrophied, (correspondingly) superior military technique (& organising/ financing of such) of the French/ british powers (honed in fighting each other) by default sucked them into championing one proxy or another to advance their interests, until (with French defeated/ bankrupted) British were the main power

& this correlates to the idea that the internal geo pol/econ dynamic geo pol/econ agenda resulting from India’s size was paradoxically the chief factor that played against it…

…creating an insular geo psychology, an insular fragmentation of power

…that contrasted dramatically with Europe, that increasingly sought to suck in the whole world into enabling/ financing its nations to kill each other ever more efficiently – in struggle for survival; producing an evolving war/ finance nexus of optimised efficiency

Whereby the great crumbling internal Mughal empire appears still as the greater threat to/ target of smaller states – sufficient to allow the new rising empire to continue to acquire power – so that the geo psychological dynamic becomes one of resignation, enabling (British) consolidation of power – before a sufficient degree of unity could overcome such, by which time it was too late…

Paradoxically the best example of this can be seen in the 1857 rebellion of the remnants of the old order…

Whereby the corresponding organic fragmentation of the resistence…

…& its defeat, was paradoxically the precondition for the emergence of a modern all Indian nationalism, that however still could not immediately drive out the British Raj; precisely because the character of its internal divisions was such, that as soon as it made any serious attempt to bring sufficient force to bear, it tended to disintegrate into communal strife – leaving the British above the fray – indeed possessed of a kind of paradoxical imperial legitimacy…

THIS tendancy for the sword to shatter into communal fragments as soon as made contact, is why Indian nationalism had to follow a specifically non violent model (an antecedant for the contempory Revolutionary model of a diminishing calculus of force…), so as to render imperial control increasingly non profitable/ contributing to exhaustion of British imperial machine & allowing an all Indian national identity to be cultivated…

…whilst simultaneously keeping to an irreducible minimum communal strife – by relying principally upon the power of inertia

…Gandhi seeking to make a virtue/ forge a concept of national legitimacy out of an operational necessity…

Though so perilously thin was this veneer of urban elite orchestrated inter communal unity, covering the hellish depths of landlordist/ feudal communal insularity (with Gandhi as tuning fork in chief), that as the british position became manifestly progressively weaker (especially throughout the 1930’s), Muslims firstly looked to British (paradoxical) imperial legitimacy to provide security gaurentees & then ultimately/ irresistibly to the establishment of Pakistan in areas where they had a contiguous majority…

The principle factors that allowed the rest of India to hold together at all as an independent entity after the British exhausted by 2 world wars…

…was the combo of this fragile inertial concept of national political legitimacy, most strikingly evinced in the hunger strike of Gandhi as a counter to the post independence anti Muslim riots (following partition) & his subsequent assassination by Hindu fascist RSS; which actually sealed the political legitimacy/ secular identity of the Indian state – albeit dependant on the second factor…

…That the cold war threatened superpower engagement in any seccession. This so raised the price of seccession, that no decisive consensus could be found to prosecute such – enabling India via a 3rd world nationalist ideology/ socialist fuedalist framework…

that combined 3rd world nationalist ideology, workers’ interests with those of feudal landlords…

to hold together by sheer inertia

The apogee of socialist feudalism (of the Nehru dynasty) was Indira Gandhi’s (post 1966 devaluation) increasingly radical pol/econ program of nationalisations – attempted land reform, which ultimately foundered against the fact that the people in charge of such were themselves landed interests…

…& reaction against authoritarian approach used to try to push such through…

This in turn led to the pro market approach from desai…

Then post Indira Gandhi’s assassination…

Eg the authoritarian centre fuelling secessionist tendancies – eg Akali Dal in Punjab to the extent that Sanjay Gandhi reduced to sponsoring Bhindranwalia in an attempt to split the regional opposition – which backfired/ ultimately led to the showdown at the golden temple in 1984 (& Indira Gandhi’s assassination)

…Rajiv Gandhi became PM & adopted a market centred approach

Which proved sufficiently unpopular to lose (1989) to a left split from Congress led by VP Singh allied with other leftist/ regionalist parties & curiously, the fascist BJP (& RSS/ VHP), whose leader LK Advani (against the backdrop of Hindu fascist/ landlordist/ middle cclass opposition to VP Singh’s attempt to sponsor legislation consolidating position among Dalits etc) saw the opportunity to legitimate from within govt the destruction of the Barbary Mosque at Ayodhya, & correspondingly seize command of the geo cultural agenda in India for Hindu fascism, becoming the rallying standard among India’s rising middle class.

This leaves us with the Q, WHY did Indira Gandhi’s policy fail???

We know contempory Indian capitalism growing beyond a certain point is seen as the enemy in a megastate context by its own people…

…So WHY did Indira Gandhi’s (semi authoritarian) 3rd world radicalism appear as violating `freedom’???

Eg how the hell do you account for a geo cultural concept of freedom that inexorably leads the way to the fascist BJP – which (if unchecked) will blow India to smithereens???

You can discern amidst the insanity a kind of logic, whereby, India having gone through the traumas resulting from its geo pol/econ insularity, from periodic invasions, from the Aryans, to the Mughals to finally the British, through the struggle to break free from the last, struggles to define its own concept/ understanding of freedom, whereby its populous are ever more engaged in expressing themselves in relation to the rest of the world…

…& rather than tolerate another despotic raj however ostensibly enlightened, they would rather freely choose to set out on the path to oblivion, so that finally on the edge of perdition, as an animated globally connected civil society, they can learn as a people what does not work, as the first precondition to becoming aware of what can work, & what their role is - as future leaders of the human race – defined by the universalist conception

The way this plays out is that the Manmohan Singh govt must ultimately fall; eg after fear of BJP, the only thing that preserves attention of Communist Party of India members is going on the offenseive to the extent of undermining capitalist hegemony…

…forcing a contra reaction/ war as a diversion & implosion

But (as with China) the aforementioned petrodollar crash cuts across this, though, as noted, India needs a transcendent vision eclipsing its internal apocalyptic parochialisms – enabling India to hold together…

& while we have as outlined before how development of the new global security architecture requires that after Israel gives back the last of the 1967 lands, that Pakistan gets rid of its nukes & assumes command of the global commonwealth confederation (Pakistan is dynamically marked by the threat of Hindu fascism if it does not)…

…both marginalizing Hindu fascism & providing Pakistan with cover/ protection (from the emergent oil superstate) as it negotiates re-unification with India – especially vis the rebuilding of the Barbary mosque at Ayodhya – so that India can monitor USA nukes, checking USA apocalyptic expansionism in order to free USA visionary expansionism – including for solar power desalination & universalist conception – giving/ stabilizing India with a global role/ universal vision…

The key Q is WHY would Pakistan agree to re-unify with India NOW & not BEFORE???

Pakistan HAD to secede before, otherwise would have been prone before Hindu pogroms & ended up splitting under even more adverse circumstances…

…but NOW re-unification is possible ONLY because it is imperative, to stabilize not merely Inida (to enable India to play its global role) but the world; & this held together (also) by universalist conception (transcending India’s apocalyptic parochialisms) is what stabilizes India…

China

China differed from European fragmentation of power in a number of key respects.

Wheras Europe was defined by natural ethno national linguistic/ racial borders – defining states most of which had access to the sea – helping to consolidate these borders & with them the European fragmentation of power between & (more or less) within states…

…the lack of such (correspondingly consolidatable) ethno political borders in China meant that to swallow another few thousand sqKm of territory was not enough to rout your enemy/ consolidate power (in china), - which in turn made the borders (& correspondingly geo pol/econ psychology) between regional magnates even more unreliable – so that only by capturing/ unifying the whole of China – traditionally by securing the `Mandate of Heaven’ with the support of a peasant army & consolidating this position through extensive public works projects that could only be undertaken by general mobilisation of the Chinese state (pre-emptively weakeing the position of any warlords), could order be established/ consolidated…

This characterised China by virtue of its size as an imperial & therefore insular megastate from ancient times…

…lacking Europe’s expansionist drive, because thank you very much, it was quite big enough as it was & had to focus most of its energies upon internal development/ holding itself together in the face of regional faultlines/ social tension, rather than the expansionist colonial conquests which European states had to undertake in competition with each other to try & prevent themselves falling too far behind – which in turn contributed to internal fragmentation of power (of a rising merchant class) as an aid to innovation/ pluralistic strength; particularly/ specifically in Britain- which when their last illusory hope to pass on costs of falling rate of profit onto American colonists curtailed by American Revolution, had no choice but to seek an outlet (for its cheap capital) through industrial development…

Hence the power of the centralising Chinese state, its strength was also its weakness & WHY China had such a massive head start on the rest of humanity (so far ahead of it until the 19th centuary) instead of dominating the world like this preposterous little island – indeed lacking the strategic imperatives to do so (quite the reverse); got periodically swallowed up by regional/ social tensions/ decadence (loss of `heavenly mandate’) & corresponding cycles of renewal (new heavenly mandate/ emperor)

This logic, the need to maintain internal geo pol/econ equilibrium can best be demonstrated vis the way that prior to the Mongol invasion, a tendancy to drift to the south left the country prone before the invader…

…which impact of, even after Mongols decline/ retreat

(Because while it was possible to conquer China on horseback, to adopt the means to administer it/ avoid losing power, so tied up Mongols own fighting capacity that their position so weakened; forced to retreat)

…so affected China’s geo historic memory, that China’s central geo pol/econ pre-occupation was the maintenance of sufficient internal equilibrium to fill up its spaces for reasons of security; which meant that the Chinese state had to keep the power of the merchants in check/ adopt a more insular geo pol/econ framework, simply to stop itself falling prey to Central Asian threats (Mongols/ tartars/ Russians)

& this rendered insurmountable the paradox of its development, that increases in wealth/ productivity, merely fed through in increases in population – rather than a shift to concentrations of capital inclined/ compelled to industrial revolution…

…by interstate competition compelling such for sake of national survival, quite the opposite, Chinese national survival pointed away from such an approach…

Indeed China victims of their own superiority, as increased production led to population increases – which led to a dead end absorbing increased productivity…

range of anti catalytic factors:

Proportionate weakness of merchants

Lack of interstate competition generating a symbiotic premium on strategic innovations with state policy

Insular geo psychology/ geo imperatives

The vast panoply of anti catalytic options for solving bottlenecks without radical innovation (against therefore not generating symbiotic innovations with state policy)

This circuitous (defining closed) loop of development defined China until the opium wars…

…the primary cause of which was Britain’s negative balance of payments with china, which could only be reversed through the sale of opium (triangular trade with India/ china/ Britain), which over an extended timeframe (mid 1820’s – mid 1830’s) actually led to a silver shortage in China…

As to the Q how on earth was it that the manchus managed to lose the opium war/ failed to bring adequate forces to bear???

The Chinese became paradoxically victims of their own superiority…

…as the British haemmoraghed silver in exchange for Chinese goods, the only way to redress the trade deficit was through the opium trade…

…this was radically different/ more difficult to long term penetration of Mughal empire via the silver stream creating culture of dependency & thus securing a position enabling British displacement of Mughals

China was more monolithic & the British had no prior points of penetration; excepting the right to purchase Chinese goods…

However British able to exploit tensions between southern traders (to gain a foothold) & the central power (the northern originated manchus)…

…by the time the central power had adequately woken up, as internal divisions as to how to respond (eg wether to grow the stuff themselves to redress the silver drain) divided them still further…

Instructive as to their paralysis was that they felt it necessary to first prepare the ground by going after the Chinese opium traders to set the context for a later showdown with the British

Furthermore China’s (imperial) weight/ strength paradoxically played against it, was organically employed to undermine it, that it correspondingly (both) needed to & could not develop the industrial technologies vis military specialisms (to defeat the British)

This would have required the kind of social pol/econ configuration that we have seen China could not accommodate to hold itself together historically as this would require so much power to be given to the merchant class, creating such imbalances as to render china unviable therefore China left prone…

& that without such, internal order raised itself as the greatest factor

Hence the critical point is that the british had in the preceeding period accumulated enough strength to so re-inforce their position/ penetration that the weakness of the central power came into play

& consequently hereonin, the superiority of British arms was a key factor…

Therefore peasant wars eg Taipeng rebellion arising out of indirect (or direct) consequance (eg economic fallout from the silver shortage), also could not bring China’s internal forces/ reserves to bear…

Q WHY did previous emperors NOT rely so heavily on the gentry to defeat peasant insurgencies???

Because such represented a weakening/ evolving dissolution of the central power…

(&) to re-iterate what made the Taipeng unviable, was the very processes that gave rise to them…

Eg:

The silver shortage &:

The inability of the Manchu to stop the silver drain – as previous modalities of keeping China together mitigated against the kind of industrial revolution necessary to modernise China’s antique military machine…

Therefore a frontal assault by the Taipeng (on the British) unviable

Therefore Manchu could (as proxy/ comprador forces – anxious to keep the country together – albeit prone before the unequal treaties – with colonial powers), lean on the gentry – to hold the centre in immediate term – at cost of fatally weakening the centre over the longer term…

The continuing inability to fend of encroachment of imperial powers in turn led to a systemic exhaustion of historical options leading up to the 1949 takeover…

Beginning with policy of `self strengthening’ which with the grafting of military/ corresponding heavy industrial technology (dependant increasingly on the gentry for funds – further weakening the central power & shifting power towards the regions) onto the old Chinese state…

Correspondingly a quai mystic movement, the Boxer rising targeted foreign infleuences was initially restrained by the Manchus, then allowed to burn itself out to avoid it turning on the Manchu state – its’ failure further (indeed definitively) underscoring the inability of peasant rebellions to renew the state in the old way

…had the inexorable tendancy of providing the powerbase of a military poltical cadre led by Sun Yat Sen, seeking to further accelerate industrialisation of China, which as such led to further strengthening of power of the gentry, to provide funds for industrialisation – which could only be undertaken on a regional (as opposed to an all China) basis, led to a peculiar break up of China into regional warlordisms, yet with fairly impressive industrial development, rather than disintegratory chaos…

Eg as the old antique Chinese state was defined more by previous fear of chaos from central Asia/ corresponding need to maintain internal equillirium than the new wave of colonialism, its break up while a massive & intolerable blow to China’s sense of itself, did not decisively hinder development

(an oblique comparison can be drawn between the original rise of China as a result of its’ earlier break up leading to rival warlordisms/ techno innovation – which beyond a certain point, China’s geographic insularity/ the lack of such ongoing rivalry sucking in the whole world to make its’ internecine strife more efficient …

…resolved itself in re-unification & definition against barbarian threats to its west…)…

Q WHAT does this tell us about the apparent paraxdoxical conflict between China’s national narrative & its process of industrial development???

That the antique Chinese state, having been effectively broken up by colonial incursion, could not modernise itself by itself, in a unified way…

& that therefore, it correspondingly became prone before any passing notion that fed the delusion that it could…

Hence, prone before Britain/ German/ Japan/ America etc, Chinese nationalists instinctively wanted to use the Soviet Union to break free/ enable modernisation of their country…

But, this meant the nationalist structures/ frameworks/ infrastrucure that the USSR helped set up became absolutely packed decisively with USSR agents at the highest levels…

This was a trade…

USSR assistance to build structures that Chinese nationalism had proven by itself it could not possibly develop, in exchange for USSR being able to hitch a ride in covert (as opposed to overt takeover of the Eastern bloc post WWII, OR of openly communist parties) form on the back of Chinese nationalism…

When the open CCP formations/ allied fractions took a hammering in 1927, the Chinese nationalists under Chiang kai Sheik looked to have got the better end of the deal…

But wheras other states balance between other powers to preserve/ strengthen or defend their centre, it is of key significance Chinese dependant on USSR to even enable establishment of a unificatory centre…

Correspondingly & bearing in mind the CCP by Mao’s admission concentrated against the backdrop of the Japanese invasion, 70% on trying to secure control of territory, 20% on fighting the nationalists & only 10% on fighting the Japanese (which would give further credence to Hang & Halliday’s assertion it was a lot less than 10%)…

…the basis of the 1949 takeover was:

Post WWII exhaustion of the old colonial powers, including reluctance of USA (after Japan) to in any way get dragged into an Asian land war – which colored their policy vis China.

The deep penetration of nationalist forces with CCP/ USSR agents

A (corresponding to the nebulous agreement with USA reached vis war with Japan & correspondingly vague notion of USSR’s right of intervention into China) massive Russian invasion allowing the then rather ropey CCP army formations to regroup in Manchuria

Combo of systematic corruption in nationalist regime with the feeding of their armies to the CCP by aforementioned CCP/USSR operatives within said nationalist forces; bringing about a catastrophic collapse in morale of nationalist forces, a process which fed of itself – leading to 1949 takeover

& as Chiang Kai Sheik would have been dependant on colonial aid as vis USSR; there was no such viable animal as Chinese nationalism, excepting the bizarre terror of Mao, which created a 3rd world nationalist crust/ megastate ideology allowing capitalism to develop on an all China basis…

So because nobody could impose what they really wanted (& the culture was too geo politically/ internally crumbly for a negotiated compromise), everybody got what nobody wanted…

The nationalists/ bourgeois/ gentry (we have seen) were too weak to impose what they wanted – as in hock to the USSR.

The colonialists could not impose what they wanted (lacking in strength/ exhausted).

The peasantry could not even define what it wanted

The Russians could commit decisively to effect a change in govt, but could not really impose what they wanted…

& wheras with every other exotic political figure (Lenin, DeGaulle, not to mention Hitler or Petain) that appeared to come from nowhere; there was at least a clear political market for them, so therefore, chart the reasons for the success of the market (that led to their advance) & symbiotic evolution) of their fraction, & the rest pretty much follows from there…

…but mao?

Where was the political market for such a figure that refused even to obey Stalin???

Not only that, unlike the first 4, Mao had to trade his wares before anyone was willing to buy such…

So the Q is, WHY did the political market in China not function properly???

Mao’s victory is connected to how the Taipeng lost…

Eg the inherent inflexibility of ancient all Chinese pol/econ

Eg the heavenly mandate only applies within the boundaries of the ancient geo pol/econ modality (which we thought originally, had been resurrected by colonial weakness/ USSR connexion – on a modified basis)

Therefore a peasant war could NOT have brought a radical/ reformist govt to power, as it would have collapsed back into warlordism – without being subordinate to geo pol connexions to USSR…

Eg peasant war within Chinese megastate too big to be subordinate, leds back into capitalism & back into warlordistm & therefore inherently abortive

Therefore essentially a battle of colonialisms, in which the CCP prevailed (thanks to border with USSR)…

WHAT was the difference between India & China???

(As noted) British imperial legitimacy In India was defined by default (Indian Communalism) therefore (as noted), Indian nationalist legitimacy had to define itself in this context against it (a la Gandhi) in such fashion as avoided communal strife/ (or at any rate) kept it from destroying everything…

Well, while China’s internal pol/econ agenda was defined by colonialism, it had no such imperial legitimacy to brace itself against to define a peaceful anti imperial legitimacy (& as noted the traditional form of renewalist insurgency/ `mandate of heaven’ to renew/ restore the old Chinese state rendered unviable by colonialism…

Correspondingly, in this setting, political natural selection determined it was less important to actually prepare a movement capable of seizing power in its own right, than to corral/ secure control of even a disintegrating political core, with the intention of so directing it to catch the (eg post WWII Russian) wave capable of propelling it to power…

The singular defining characteristic of the regime (vis 1949 takeover) was a kind of creative destruction…

…The economic, cultural & above all geo psychological destruction of the old political economic ways, vis the subordination of the economy to the goal of the `suprpower program’, to both blackmail USSR into giving it the requisite technology (thence dragging it into war over Taiwan) & paying for such with super exploitation of the peasantry…

…the attempt to accelerate such in defiance of econ physiological reality/ (immediate) potentiality through the `great Leap forward’, ending (aided by Vietnam war enabling recapturing of agenda by Mao) with the `Cultural revolution’…

…a general mobilisation (from above by Mao) of sections of civil society against the party & indeed itself…

…which both exhausted the residual potential to retain control through terror alone…

(hence also rapproachment with USA – even though this was inevitably aimed as being another alternative source of weapons technology)

& yet, so seared that terror into the mindset of China, that it has post Mao, increasingly enabled capitalism to develop within a socialist infrastructural/ 3rd world national liberationist ideological framework…

Indeed the effectiveness of this logic is best illustrated by the Tianenmen Square massacre in 1989 in which 4000 students massacred…

Originally a protest vis corruption vis the collapse of the 2 price system (as result of the rising power of the capitalist sector eclipsing the socialised sector), against the effect (if not explicitly against) expanding capitalism eclipsing the `iron rice bowl’ & supported by bourgeois seeking more freedom/ room for manoeuvre…

It was necessary for the CCP to restore order for capitalism, to enable its continuing development under the ideological cover of the 3rd world nationalist conception – in turn econ growth (based on USA trade deficit) providing sufficient basis to stabilise regime over an extended timeframe…

Q But WHY is capitalism able to rule in its own name in India (even though in so doing, it will blow the state to smithereens) but not at all in China???

It is the very fractured aspect of India itself (its tendancy to blow itself to kingdom come) that enabled Britain to gain a foothold/ colonise India/ retain control via imperial legitimacy (threat of fragmentation)…

…which in turn functioned as a brace enabling anti colonial legitimacy to define itself against such initially on basis of socialist feudalism; eg inertia held India together (eg no decisive constituency could commit to secede for fear of prohibitive costs vis superpower engagement) – but post cold war capitalist development encouraged, but has led to expansion of both radical forces increasingly seeing their own megastate elite as the main threat: and classical fascist forces – propelling the country to war as a military plutocratic apocalyptic diversion/ means to retain control of the pol/econ agenda even if for only as long as it takes to so blow the subcontinent to smithereens…

As noted it is (aided by the USSR) only the CCP’s restoration of/ attainment of the `mandate of heaven’ (vis 3rd world national liberationist ideology) which has stabilized Chinese capitalism; and in so doing restored the capacity of the old `renewalist’ insurgent model to once again manifest itself…

(when formerly it could not do so, because the imperialist breeches in China’s ancient insular pol/econ, as noted, rendered such abortive – hence the reliance on the gentry pushed the country in the direction of capitalism & warlordism)

Yet while the old insular `renewalist’ model is capable of withdrawing the `mandate of heaven’;

Eg both because rise of Chinese capitalism beyond a certain point posits it as the principle/ most visible enemy of its’ own people – see the anti Japan riots as proof of this generally unstable tendancy AND the aforementioned petrodollar crash…

It is self evidently impossible for insular renewalism to establish a new `mandate of heaven’…

Indeed as already noted, the only way a new `mandate of heaven’ can be established is…

…on the basis of global constitutional division between written secular constitution/ unwritten universal constitution; & defining geo cultural priority of the first, as being to enable all humanity to have enough time to comprehend the second…

…& this requires both a (transitional) nuclear shotgun wedding between CCP (at one & the same time delegitimised by the fallout from the petrodollar crash & partially relegitimised by same crash) and Chinese civil society…

…the very focus of which must be the aforementioned Jerusalem centred framework as outlined in Chapters 1-3…

AND a connexion to global civil society beginning with aforementioned Jerusalem centred global security architecture framework & consolidated vis Europe’s peacekeeping operations in South Africa – to prevent slaughter of the white minority – which decisively compels the re-engineering of Euro/ global constitution/ institutions; to enable global reconstruction especially vis solar powered desalination…

…For the mandate of heaven of the new global commonwealth confederation, is to be found in its commitment to developing Planet Africa…

…including also as our global insurance policy (vis threat of a mini ice age – vis flooding of gulf stream warm water currents with glacial freshwater turning them off), in turn dependant on solar powered decentralist development…

Based on the basic social econ unit as a freestanding unit – access to energy, water & info giving it strategic depth, consequently also able to pool sovereignty & therefore see of all security threats from predatory warlords/ magnates that have no mandate from the pooled sovereignty of wider humanity

Precisely it be only via such that especially impenetrable Africa could be in any way (however destructively) be opened up – as only such had the levers (of war/ finance) to do so – the sheer impenetrable vastness of Africa in particular overwhelming humanity’s attempts to master the territory. territory.

Hence any attempt to copy the conventional model of development must fail – even any significant wealth generation develops such internal migration across wide & porous borders (increasingly a problem for the west – ironically prior to its geo pol/econ crash) as to overwhelm same.

Unless, development based much more (though not exclusively) on the freestanding social econ unit (energy/ water/ info), so that there is both not principally any boomtown locale to flood into, AND people know they will be made use of/ be able to develop.

Thus the balance of power will come to lie not in New York, London or even Jerusalem. But in the hands of the sovereign individual.

& as a model which the whole world must adopt as a framework of development (eg India’s jugular the glacial River Ganges threatened with extinction – therefore solar powered desalination necessary as both a fallback and to enable development without destroying the Ganges – similar for China with its insane policy (as at 27/7/05) to build 600 new coal fired powerstations & Europe/ USA itself.

…through which we develop the techniques/ mindset that befit us to join the rest of the universe/ become God & visit the same crap on the next cosmic generation….

The idea of asking the Q was 1949 actually (a revolution) an authentic peasant war, simply never occurred to me to ask…

Eg vis a country historically obsessed with the heavenly mandate (& corresponding peasant wars in pre colonial times), the cautious/ conservative interpretation was that post WWII, as the colonial powers weakened, china simply reverted to type with a modified ideological crust that however defined the regime as less insular than before, even if this was merely expressed in a stream of coarse ideological invective to confer on itself historic/ political/ narrative legitimacy…

(as can be seen in Vol I Chapter 7 & Vol II Chapter 2 of `Substance Over Form’)

…& as to the Q then how on earth does my entire work not collapse into ashes, I can only erspond, that as can see throughout this work, that the evolution of this work is defined/ led principally by the anomalies that have to be addressed to get this work (the operational gameplan) just about good enough to serve as the starting point from which humanity can begin to get on top of the unflding apocalyptic geo pol/con chaos…

That as it was only when the operational gameplan could comprehend China, that we could address ourselves to the global peasant war & contrast it with the earlier crisis of slavery, that I then (had &) could meaningfully deal with this Q & its implications in more depth…

…time being at a premium, & the priority always being to remain sufficiently flexible in approach to be able to anticipate/ spot/ respond to the decisive flaw/ anomaly, that will compel the next paradigm/ re-engineering of my work…

…so that it can/ will be just about good enough to serve as the starting point for humanity to get on top of the aforementioned chaos…

The Global Peasant War (part 2)

For as well as vis technology, the message/ means used organically to control the global peasantry vis modern media/market forces, means the global peasantry now has a global reach/ impact, which has to be taken notice of…

…wheras before, at both the progressive & reactionary levels, there were entire social bulwarks/ classes acting as buffers between the imperial metropolitan core & the great mass of global humanity…

…by (organically) appealing directly to the global people (over the heads of their rulers progressive & reactionary) the USA led imperial metropolitan core has become much more of a direct target, has destroyed the old geo pol/econ buffers between (USA led) metropolitan core & the 3rd world…

Eg if the FMLN/ FSLN failed to resist USA tyranny in El Salvador/ Nicaragua, who cares? Just hop over the Mexican border into the USA…

Pissed off with the way your country is as a result of your previous Islamic fascists anti communist alliance with the USA? Sick of their smug burger munching faces on your TV everyday? Its not your fault, so just blow the mothers away a la Sept 11th…

…Or if you are feeling generous, just blow up an oil pipeline & let them walk their fat arses off…

### The (Consequant) Triangular

### Battle to Control Technology

& this mortal peril, rather than chastening USA imperial hubris, renders it more explosive in its laager psychology. Though the point would have to be conceded, that any failure to check USA imperial hubris leads to an apocalyptic nuclear expansionist decadence/ tailspin in any case.

Indeed as noted earlier, Sept 11th actually stabilised USA geo pol/econ psychology, for a period, by preventing (shifting focus from) scandals vis Enronisation of the entire geo pol/econ gaining their own critical momentum…

& as the essence of the global peasant war is the power to challenge/ even break the (USA led) metropolitcan core without itself being able to consolidate a new/ alternative geo pol/econ centre of gravity; the proliferation of WMD…

USA threatens China, China goes nuclear, India responds likewise, Pakistan follows & trades spare parts to fund its own program…

…must also be considered part of the global peasant war

(moreover, we have already seen how/ why China/ India cannot, as megastates, take over from USA as imperial leaders of the military plutocratic system – so that insofaras they are part of the metropolitan core, they are on basis of war/ finance nexus, even more so part of the 3rd world)

Eg both because USA’s attempts (aided by threat of its own 10,000 nukes) to deliberately retard countries development (so as to prevent them even having the capacity to develop their own WMD programs) feeds inexorably into (global) revanchist sentiment AND because this consequent imbalance is an additional factor meaning the geo pol/econ cost of WMD development is so great that such become the innate focus of the state political psychology (of course, for such not to be hindered, would mean the `effortless’ acquisition of WMD would both encourage others to commit themselves & lead to general quantative & qualitative proliferation of WMD)…

…& were we not already heading for such, this USA drive for `full spectrum dominance’ would be the primary cause for global econ collapse…

Which brings us to the next factor, the failure of the info revolution to either automatically enable a post military plutocratic order, or prevent the collapse of the military plutocratic system…

For inevitably the (character of the) info revolution was shaped by the inevitable rise of global finance beyond the control of any nation state…

…as a tool to assist this process…

& yet the information revolution has made the old repressive military plutocratic state (its machinery), ever increasingly unviable (as a means to retain control – even briefly) – even as it grasps impotently for more power it withers away – without automatically giving rise to a new post military plutocratic order…

Eg for while the info revolution was self evidently integral to the breaking of the power of (generally parochial) organised labor – it nevertheless armed to the teeth the very sam people, as a potential global civil society…

Not so much as workers, still less as consumers, but rather as thinking humans – held together by the culture of the common threats/ objectives confronting all humanity – the chief objective being to gain control of our own time, to not only master all threats to our survival but universal time itself…

But paradoxically, to awaken/ enable global civil society to so mobilise itself, the revanchist 3rd world fascists had to be the initial beneficiaries to help re-animate people in the process of the collapse/ breaking of the old centre BEFORE the Revolution could fill the breech & establish the new centre of gravity (eg vis the aforementioned Nuclear Shotgun Wedding)…

The key here is a general unwillingness to die in strategic battles of for the interests of our elites & how this reshapes the psycho political battlefield – that the raising of the perceived price of blood, vis the 3rd world, is precisely what makes us weak before asymmetric warfare…

…& (paradoxically) gives them the techno advantage

eg as our lopsided/ top heavy techno configuration is turned against us (never mind also by spread of disease from impoverished 3rd world overwhelming the metropole) & not just (though as well by) Al Qaeda’s diffuse cyber model…

even though their `victory’ leads to the destruction of the very technologies that enable them to wage their campaign (leading to descent into primal panic/ chaos etc)…

### What Is To Be Done?

As well as the aforementioned geo pol/econ framework, & a techno model based on riding the shockwave…

As the hitherto root of our failure to gain mastery over our destiny lies in our hitherto failure to view everything in terms of DEEP TIME, the solution to this lies in understanding:

6 The Paradoxes of the Human Soul

The operational & theoretical core of our work is the seperation between the secular written constitution & (the purpose of which is to help us to comprehend) the unwritten universal constitution.

Yet, we can only definitively prove the existence of a supreme being by establishing said framework (constitutional division) - & yet we need said supreme being as a supra reserve of courage to enable humanity to establish said framework…

This is a paradox that lies not merely at the heart of our work; but at the heart of all humanity, & has done in essence since the beginning of time…

....The foundation of the paradoxes of the human soul is that consciousness emerged out of dust.

We sought/ seek to understand ourselves, our world our creator & the first great (series) event is that we are enslaved by the first really great machine of our own creation, the war/ finance nexus....

Beyond a certain point, the land (`natural economy') could not support a rising population.

Thence it becomes necessary both to resort (beyond an episodic/ incipient level) to settled agriculture (to feed rising population); and also (to defend both the natural resources of the land & its husbanded agricultural base which necessitated) the development (beyond an episodic/ incipient level) of a war economy, war technology (increasingly metallurgy), which further drove economic & technological development....

An emergent war/ finance nexus (increasing circulation of means of exchange, especially gold/ silver, acceptable across incipient state boundaries between allies & adversaries alike) breaking up the earlier protohistoric economy (which tends very much to be under-rated in it's technical sophistication) as it dictated the social pol/econ agenda internally (within each emerging proto state construct) and externally by setting the agenda for patterns of trade & military pol/econ alliances....

....(&) we have seen that the end result (of evolution of the war/ finance nexus) is the core paradox:

....that the USA led military plutocratic elite depend on the Revolution to seize power (from the war/ finance nexus/ machine they are the gilded slaves of), to save their (everyone's) children: & that the Revolution (to avoid global annihilation) is dependant on this factor & must tailor its entire military pol/econ framework accordingly....

....(but) before & now is the Great Existential Paradox:

....that charity begins at home AND charity begins with preventing the (nuclear) annihilation of humanity, (that) both concepts clash AND yet ultimately depend on each other.....

...Which primal angst at guilt of which, also feeds into the fear/ philosophy of hell; which stood in for the (then historically unripe) core paradox as a cypher. And the philosophy of hell

derivative of fears of the Great Existential Paradox, that such is unresolvable UNTIL the (historically ripened) Core Paradox enables their general resolution; that we are responsible for the guilt accruing from either our sins against society or family, & as we cannot serve both we will face hideous consequences either way. Especially as without the (historically ripened) Core Paradox, we cannot help but sin against humanity anyway, as our poor Bolshevik ancestors discovered.

.... is organically hijacked by incipient elites in order (as a precondition) to retain control....

....So the Great Existential Paradox actually functions organically as a weapon of choice for the war/ finance nexus, at least until eclipsed by the core paradox, enabling the worst most tortuous features of the Great Existential paradox to be institutionally overcome....

Now the 2 dimensional (anthropomorphic) God concept, the idea that `man was created in God's image' (certainly common to Judaeo/ Christian/ Islamic traditions & logical default undercurrent in others)....

....clashes with (& undermines) understanding of existential dialectics (& paradoxes of the human soul) which are based on the fact that human soul was not created (fully formed) by a deity but emerged out of dust....

The Mind of God

As to the Q `if there is a God why is there so much suffering in the world? And HOW can you claim as you do, that vis Christianity/ Islam etc, there WAS (& IS) a manifestation of a God dialectic, yet SUBORDINATE to the hegemony of matter over consciousness? HOW can God allow itself to be arsed about in this unholy fashion?'

Consciousness springs forth from (cosmic) dust (not even shit), & through an accretion of knowledge, a super criticality is attained (aided by supra reserve of courage - vis the new rev theory & its deployment), enabling through humanity’s multidimensional sacrifice/ re-inforcement- (as the sun gives life to the earth – though different, in that humanity must consciously choose life, by drawing on the supra reserve to enable) the hegemony of consciousness over matter to arise & humanity to (ultimately) become God.

But you cannot point to as direct conclusive proof of God's existence the wonder `miracle' of nature in say, a leaf or tree (nature - eg the oft phrase `...isn't life miraculous? A God MUST have made it.'). For such an approach leads down the road of projecting a vision of an ALL controlling deity, every action/ event etc the product of an enslaved/ enslaving fatalism - rather than ultimate control of process, through aiding (via supra reserve of courage) human consciousness/ knowledge to attain (through exercise of FREE WILL) hegemony over matter - as an independent FREE entity/ agency (rather than the sordid plaything of a celestial Saddam Hussein).

Creation (the act of) was a work of art NOT of science.

Scientific knowledge/ consciousness grows out of it as an independent agency, drawing on the supra reserve of courage to enable it to attain hegemony over matter. And so thence become God, replicating the process. Art thence remains WITHIN this consciousness, the ultimate flowering (via scientific knowledge) of art.

....& this (anthropomorphic God) concept has a symbiotic relationship with the Great Existential Paradox, in that the philosophy of hell (the aforementioned cypher for the historically unripe Core Paradox & derivative of fears from the Great Existential Paradox) is ripe for priestification. & if you (appear to) control the gates of heaven & hell, you have political control; until the core paradox historically ripens.

UNTIL then, free will/ consciousness is subordinate to hegemony of matter over consciousness (war/ finance nexus over civil society).
The most noteworthy primordial manifestation (of this subordination of consciousness to matter) being the legend of the `The Fall’… that (as) even, especially the light bearer (`Lucifer’) was cast out for rebelling against God (vis encouraging man to seek independant knowledge of good & evil), that demonstrably humanity cannot save itself by its own autonomous revolutionary initiative, but must instead wait for external divine intervention… this legend is the geo psycho political caldera of the entire Judaeo – Christian – Islamic world. & (as noted throughout S.O.F.; but especially Vol III) it is in this geo psycho political setting that the fate of all humanity will be decided more than anywhere else in the context of the unfolding global pol/econ implosion of the war/ finance nexus.

..... that in order to physically as well as intellectually preserve/ restore/ extend light in both forms (electrical & intellectual), humanity must exploit the chaos/ fear engendered by the final collapse of military plutocratic system to push a rev geo pol/econ framework (which we outlined in `Communique Number 1' in `Lucifer2.zip'- refer back to as required, or wait until we include text of said communique shortly) enabling it to gain hegemony over its own creation (consciousness gaining hegemony over matter...) vis culture of common threats/ objectives confronting all humanity (especially in immediate term, to develop sustainable energy sources - aided by civil society control of finance/ its own creation - humanity no longer subordinate to the war/ finance nexus)....

The very beginings of this new pol/econ culture are to be found in the hope that comes from the beginnings of a viable strategy/ methodolgy to deal with said apocalyptic threats - under pressure of said threats. Representing the pivotal point in history, the precise point at which human consciousness begins to assert its hegemony over matter/ finance/ its' own creation (hence to name `Lucifer2.zip' - an aggressive refusal to submit to our primordial original fear - expressed in the legend of `The fall', but to exploit the chaos to seize command of our own destiny (we examine the strategic role of the cultural co-option of Christian/ Islamic/ Jewish etc imagery in Chapter 2 of `Intro to Quantum Materialism' - contained in `Lucifer2.zip').

....to break our own programming & seize command of our own destiny (through the methods outlined in `Communique Number 1' in `Lucifer2.zip'- refer back to as required)

B Towards the Grand Unified Theory/ Process (2)

(To start with the basics) Vis free will & its limitations, we can discount as self evidantly wrong the popular (scientific) notion of a universe `for every possible outcome (of every event)'...

Eg (routine examples given) that Hitler won WWII or Napoleon won before him (which impossible `possibilities' - we have already disposed of by explaining how/ why these unstable inherently hyper-inflationary plundering wannabee Caesarisms could not consolidate viable centres of geo pol/econ gravity under any eventuality whatever).

For aside from the historic limits of free will already outlined (that only when war/ finance nexus/ hegemony of matter over consciousness no longer able to reform itself in response to a radical shock - is free will a decisive historic factor) it is not only (according to this logic) the major events that require a universe (of their very own for each possible outcome); but every possible outcome of every decision however trivial (eg wether I scratch my balls with my left hand or my right, wether or not I scratch my arse instead & for how long/ what minute of what hour & again or not at any given moment of any given day - & the same for everyone indeed every living organism of every species on every planet, from the beginning of time - don't even get me started on the Q of which random sperm fertilises which random egg to produce which random being.... & the knock on effects).

Free will therefore has its limitations. It only becomes a decisive historic factor under certain conditions.... eg (vis immediate pre revolution) when war/ finance nexus (military plutocratic machine) no longer able to reform itself (in response to a radical shock) - as already outlined - whence the core paradox ripens.

But also when capacity exists (eg from 1950's onwards) to destroy the world, the officers of the war/ finance nexus, have to not summon up decisive impulse to trigger all out oblivion (prioritise their children instead).

This in essence is free will's negative manifestation. A useful phenonemon (yet) still entirely consistent with hegemony of matter over consciousness....

Aside from this, the phenonemon of free will is particular not general. Eg a West African coca slave can use their ingenuity to become a slaveholder instead. But possesses no levers to overthrow the entire geo pol/econ (military plutocratic) system of which this slavery (via neo colonial cash crop dependancy) is but a very small cog.

Inequality/ tyranny can be passed of onto others, but as seen (noted as an organic process) the hegemony of matter over consciousness will always maintain itself for as long as political economic inertia benefits a decisive minority of humanity....

....only when instability becomes (so) general does free will cease being (pro-actively) particular & instead becomes (pro-actively) general...

& it is as a result of this fragmented free will producing fragmentation of consciousness that produces (the) existential paradoxes (of the human soul) we have already examined....

Q Are free will & consciousness one & the same thing?

This implies they are (that it is) latent within all matter (which is certainly no more than entirely consistent with everything else) right down to the smallest subatomic particle...

....& yet (as already seen), it is constraints on free will (including death, as we shall see later) that impose patterns of order, that enable free will to develop/ ripen/ amount to a hegemonic factor...

...eg without such, humanity (the potential of intelligent life) would destroy/ abort itself (its potential) before it ripened....

(eg if cavemen had nuclear weapons).

There is (must be therefore) a universal framework that means we are constrained from knowing any given thing before we are ready to (at least begin to) absorb the consequances of that knowledge....

(random external threats like asteroid strikes etc notwithstanding - the point is that on some planets free will/ intelligent life can develop/ gain hegemony over matter)

....at least at a general level....

Death forces intelligent life to project itself, its ideas far beyond itself.... to value its soul, its learning/ knowledge beyond its existing corporeal form....

Death prevents matter running amok, maintaining (the) incipient (especially supra) universal hegemony of consciousness over matter....

....paradoxically therefore, it is precisely in death that is to be found our hope & gaurentor against absolute universal horror....

By embracing death therefore, to resist the threat of global annihilation & vis new rev theory), we invoke this hope....

and yet.... while death/ martyrdom serves as a vehicle for such before & after (the sacrifice) the event, the event itself (the point of transition & especially familial shockwaves) is so sordid it renders a neccessary conceit, all hopes super-imposed over it even as it (helps) realise such....

How can this be so???

Because while it is (obviously) the negation of life, most brutally for those close to; in a structurally insane world hurtling towards destruction, it is (clearly) the only way to resist the ultimate madness/ oblivion.... of everything, all humanity/ it's soul....

Indeed ALL death per se (as well as rev sacrifice) is a neccessary conceit because it represents the (transient? I know not...) destruction of a living manifestation of free will in order to enable (the) fruition of free will per se.

All is passd on through knowledge anyway, upon which others in turn build... in this is to be found the expression of free will- consciousness (albeit circumscribed by said material- historical boundaries) which enables successor generations, including our successors to build... we are all the progeny of God, yet all the progeny of humanity....

But why is death a conceit, creation so imperfect???

What is the role of this neccessary imperfection???

Why does humanity(?) &/ or God(?) need for creation to be imperfect???

Because without imperfection, intelligent life/ new cosmic generation (new god) would have no independance, would in effect merely be the same deity (spiritual masturbation)...

Therefore, if God needs a soulmate (of whatever description) or just simply to create for its own sake, this is the only way...

This still does not answer the Q, how did this all begin, vis first cosmic generation (eg `where did the first god come from?'). & I (still) surmise we will only get the answer when we both need it & are ready to absorb its consequances...

...& quite probably the answer as to why creation was created is bound up to the answer to this Q....

....which in turn is almost certainly bound up with (can only be discovered by) development of a culture developing (beyond even culture of common threats/ objectives confronting all humanity/ human survival) beyond terror, beyond individual planetary parochialism.... the beginnings of the process of intelligent life becoming God.

But to illustrate the boundaries of what can immediately be deduced from what we can gather (so far), we can take things a litte further before we come up against what (I think) are (immediately, that is temporary) insurmountable barriers (wether just this side of the Revolution, or progress made further down the line on basis of common threats/ objectives confronting all humanity or, less likely, until we are ready to begin said process of intelligent life becoming God)....

C Time, Consciousness & Free will

Furthermore, as intelligent life (which emerged out of dust as an independant entity) can gain mastery over itself (with the aid of the supra reserve of courage of God), become God…

…intelligent life, while currently subject to the (material) constraints of Universal Time, can (as an intermediate deeptime objective) gain control of universal time per se (vis consciousness gaining hegemony over universe per se)...

...so that (correspondingly) not just consciousness & free will; but time, consciousness & free will are one & the same – from the standpoint of BOTH creator & created....

So the `struggle for an economy of time' posited by Marx (yes, yes I know...); is the longstanding essence of struggle of consciousness to gain hegemony over matter....

....it is as much part of the universal(ist) constitution as the fragmentation of power is. Indeed the 2 symbiotically re-enforce / enable each other (& indeed are one & the same)...

From this, we can extrapolate that control of time is the pivot upon which all hinges.

At the most basic (planetary) level, to enable humanity to gain the knowledge neccessary to confront common threats/ objectives (confronting all humanity), humanity must gain control of its own creation (make finance work for civil society - instead of remain slaves of the first great machine humanity ever made, the war/ finance nexus, which would mean oblivion...)

...but beyond this... beyond parochial planetary concerns, as it is neccessary to connect with other planetary civilisations to deal with threats too vast to confront at the (mere) planetary level, the (drive for) acquisition of knowledge as an end in itself, must (as noted) transcend even the culture of the common threats to humanity's existence; as a precondition to enable humanity to deal with such threats...

...human consciousness (all intelligent life) therefore, must finally resolve our violent relationship with God by becoming not just masters of our own creation - of time in this context - but masters of God's creation, of universal time itself....

This implies (as a first major step) a fusion of natural science with a `parascience' (enabling for example thought projection across planets)

If the present condition of such (parasciences) inspire zero or (at best) near zero confidence, remember the universal (constitutional) principle that we can only begin to acquire any part of knowledge when we are ready to at least begin to absorb the consequances of that knowledge. So it is hardly surprising that we cannot (yet) remove the safety locks on this or other tools, when we are still making such arses of ourselves with the primitive nukes.

But remember, God's creation/ universal constitution automatically prevents universal horror, eg `devils' emerging (this is the function of death - which prevents matter/ any emergent living entity running amok on a universal scale/ beyond the limits of plantery destruction). Hitler etc was no `devil', not even a lord of death, but just a dogsbody of death, glorified playground bullies - indeed the threats we face now, of oblivion, are no graver than that required to stimulate humanity (if it so exercises its' free will) to establish constitutional control of its own creation - rather than remain as slaves of the war/ finance nexus (leading to oblivion)....

The paradox then is that humanity is dependant on God, to enable it to master itself, & yet, the constitution must be secular.

Q. How to resolve?

The written secular constitution is aimed at civil society control of our own time/ creation (rather than remain slaves of the war/ finance nexus) in order to comprehend:

The unwritten universal constitution which is as outlined, indispensible for enabling humanity to execute the written secular constitution (eg drawing on the supra reserve of courage)...

Wheras the written secular constitution is purely/ simply about enabling free will (humanity to acquire time/ space to think/ confront common threats/ objectives - instead of remain slaves of war/ finance nexus), removing such constraints that generally abort it...

...the unwritten universal constitution, can only be mastered by free will per se (eg as noted Time, Consciousness & Free Will are one & the same - that God's creation of time, was the supreme act of free will)...

...Therefore to introduce any aspect of compulsion therefore, whatsoever (to even the tiniest degree) is not to extend/ develop humanity's control/ ownership/ takeover of the unwritten constitution, it is merely to bang one's head against its' childproof locks...

D Conscious Gravity & Time - Space

So in order to gain/ stabilise control of our own creation, we must gain mastery of God's…

For we can see that creation is a kind of program which requires (the) freewill that emerges from within it to gain hegemony over process & program, for it to actually be successful (intelligent life gain mastery of itself).

It also contains for us a guide principle that (with the collapse of the war/ finance nexus centre of geo pol/econ gravity) all (societal/ developmental) decisions must be taken on basis of whatever on balance best serves freewill...

To re-iterate God's creation/ universal constitution automatically prevents universal horror, eg `devils' emerging (this is the function of death - which prevents matter/ any emergent living entity running amok on a universal scale/ beyond the limits of planetry destruction).

...not just at the individual level, but at the level of any state/ corp entity, where its' own material existence takes precedence over all other people(s)/ latent potential for (general) development - especially on the basis of primacy of knowledge accumalation (eg vis common threats/ objectives confronting all humanity)...

This `supra death'....

- which we have seen played out in partial form over the previous capitalist longwave cycles; & which now (there is no potential for reform/ reconfiguration of the war/ finance nexus, as no single military plutocratic state is strong enough to lead this process by itself...) has reached the terminal stage...

....can best be termed conscious gravity.

As just as there is a maximum height for any mountain on any planet....

...before it collapses generally then absolutely under its own gravity (as with the Himalayas - vis the Tibetan Plateau), or conversely (as with smaller planet Mars - with its dead, cold, exhausted core - producing volcanic mountain Olympus Mons - 3 times the size of Everest), all further growth is curtailed by the fact that an exhausted internal pressure cannot push further out in defiance of its' own gravity...

....So there is a maximum Himalayan height for the speculative plunder of the military plutocratic state/ system ....

....its' paradoxical ability to grow aided by partial free will of a minority whilst (said war/ finance nexus) holding hostage all human survival, & (with it of course) so repressing free will in general per se (as noted the new security architecture must be based on regearing the entire geo pol/econ to the culture of common threats/ objectives confronting all humanity - establishing the cultural primacy of knowledge accumalation to confront said threats over military plutocratic hegemony)...

...before the hegemony of matter over consciousness (of finance over civil society) collapses under its own unsustainable dead weight; & free will becomes the decisive factor...

The corrolary of (the negative factor of) conscious gravity is the concept of time - space

(eg as we have demonstrated that time/ consciousness & free will are one & the same from both the standpoint of the creator & created, time- space represents the copntrol an individual/ civil society has individually/ collectively over time - to control said individual's/ humsnity's destiny - within a given spatial area/ context)

...eg the primal attraction of property is the desire to own time - space...

...as a means of accruing independance/ control from/ over nature & other people - which paradoxically however (inexorably, beyond a certain point) ends up (generally indirectly) enslaving the owner as well as wider society (to the hegemony of the war/ finance nexus over civil society)...

...unless it is aimed (& successfully) at securing an expansion of the same for the rest of civil society...

Eg this is the principle of inversion, that attempts to appropriate an excess of time - space (for oneself at other's expense on balance; or not on balance to the benefit of wider humanity) lead (generally indirectly) to becoming beholden to the hegemony of your own (finance - via the entrenched hegemony of the apocalyptically decomposing war/ finace nexus) matter over your own consciousness...

...a manifestation of conscious gravity at the molecular/ micro level...

This micro level manifestation (vis limits of free will), has it's corrollary at the macro level in that .....

Humanity is long familiar with concepts of `decadence' and of power elites that exhaust all their ingenuity/ time/ resources on holding what they have. & (even) with their intellects partially lobotomised, because the logic of such prevents them countenancing anything different...

...but with the contempory USA in particular (this is NOT to exonerate anyone else) we see this taken to a new extraordinary/ manifestly terminal extent...

...at the level of both the people as well as the elite...

At the level of the USA people, there is simply a huge market for (distractional short attention span based) stupidity. They know enough to know they don't really want to know anymore. They don't want knowledge that places them under obligations to act differently/ endure sacrifices/ pool sovereignty/ confront head on their own bullying imperial apocalyptic parochialisms.

This empire likes things kept simple - hence the phenonemal paradox of the world's most technologically developed state, yielding ever more ground to Bible based creationism - increasingly given parity with evolution in USA schools - aided by Presidential endorsement of said parity)

....The litmus test for this is Cuba.

It cannot (pre geo military pol/econ meltdown) be acknowledged that crimes committed by USA imperium against Cuba are by far & away the single biggest factor that warps the character of the Cuban state....

...for it cannot end there. Every other USA geo pol/econ power crime would have to be admitted such as would demand (not reperations but) a painful revolutionary recasting of the USA itself, to fit in with the imperatives of a single global pol/econ constitutional framework...

...only the crash will (with USA citizens fears for safety of their own children) put this on the agenda...

But it is at the level of the USA elite that we see the full power of conscious gravity...

...an elite that owns the whole world, which forges everything in its' own image, which in history has no equal in unrivalled power. And yet, which so hates itself and its' own creation & everyone that fawns before it, it wants nothing more than to destroy everything to bring our Lord & saviour riding to glory on a mushroom cloud - to save their helpless fat arse from themself...

Fortunately (vis conscious gravity) the geo pol/eon meltdown which destroys many of it's transmitting structures also debilitates said elite's control of the initiative for just long enough to allow collective free will...

The positive assertion of collective control of time - space, aided by it's negative corrollary conscious gravity temporarily undermining said elite's control of the initiative for just long enough to allow collective free will

...to seize the initiative...

.....Creation (via the self destruct mechanism) breaks down completely, unless it can become truly independant by exercising decisively it's own free will (at the general level)...

...exploiting the cataclysmic threat to enable it's execution....

Correspondingly therefore conscious gravity...

(which as already noted makes demons/ intergalactic tyranny impossible as it limits/ sets boundaries on the power of God's creation - so that, again, the free will of this creation is/ remains an independant/ viable entity..)....

...sets limits on the power of individuals (again preventing demons), so that free will (sovereignty) has actually to be pooled in order to be manifestly exercised, so that mastery of time - space (the first step on the road to humanity becoming God) is a collective endeavour...

...so that we can deduce from this, that the effective exercise of free will, for both God..

(the germ of which as already noted, is the mastery of time - space; neccessary to enable God to ultimately create its' mirror image, space - time; become our cosmic parents & visit the same crap on successor cosmic generations...)...

...as well as humanity, is therefore bound up with an acceptance of its limitations...

But as regards the obvious Q, of why should God set up a program/ process whereby the most precious theory (growing independantly out of it) is in its' initial development, entirely dependant on the efforts of one as volatile & precariously perched (socio economically) such as I,

The obvious riposte, is that on all planets where this somewhat sordid game is being played out & intelligent life survives, the terrifying experiance of having so very nearly not survived, will have the required cultural effect, of progressively eclipsing all parochialisms. So that intelligent life's vision is forever gyrostabilised by being cast ever further outwards. Firstly to greater threats binding it together but beyond this, indeed bound up with this & beyond terror itself...

beyond parochial planetary concerns, as it is neccessary to connect with other planetary civilisations to deal with threats too vast to confront at the (mere) planetary level, the (drive for) acquisition of knowledge as an end in itself, must transcend even the culture of the common threats to humanity's existence; as a precondition to enable humanity to deal with such threats...

.....to become God our cosmic parents & visit the same crap on the next cosmic generation.

E The Humility of God

What then remains of Christianity (& other such)? Of traditions reaching back over thousands of years in which the struggle for freedom has not merely gone alongside but been shot through with predatory/ colonial murder - as is only to be expected of a humanity riven through with paradox - emerging/ struggling to break free from the primordial sludge & strugling to gain conscious mastery of itself???

Is all (by default) to be ripped up again in the name of a shiny new religion/ ideology, with (not only some of the apex elite executd simply to establish that law coves & holds accountable all humanity, but) everything everyone held precious even amidst their own resentment, cast down into the flames in answer to the siren call of `purity'???

No. For as seen the new rev theory which can deal with all said threats arising out of such (which paves the way for space centric civilisation) itself manifestly draws heavily on/ is informed by all such (paradoxical) traditions. For without such, it would self evidantly be quite impossible for humanity to (get a cultural handle to) absorb the antidote to their apocalyptic component...

Q WHAT great conceptual principle does this illustrate???

In order for humanity to become God/ our cosmic parents, to avoid fucking up the next cosmic generation any more than is unavoidably neccessary, it is neccessary for us to acquire a measure of humility such as only a respect for our ancestral origins tempered by a sober honesty about their shortcomings can teach us...

For while it is unreasonable for the next cosmic generation to expect humanity become God to reduce itself back down to the grimpen mire of its primitive evolutionary development, it is equally unreasonable for God (now or humanity become God in the future) to forget the pain and horror of those that did not ask to be created....

Which finally leaves us with the great Q, vis the origins of the first supreme being:

7 The Edge of Beyond

### The Warp Drive of the Human Soul

`Imagination is more important than knowledge,

for imagination encompasses the whole universe’

– Albert Einstein

There still remains the Q:

Who/ what created the first deity/ supreme being?

From what we have demonstrated so far we can attempt the beginnings of an answer to this Q in this neccessarily unfinished/ scarcely begun volume – which may take a billion years or more to complete.

Given:

1) 1) That (as seen) time/ consciousness & free will are one & the same from the standpoints of both creator & created.

2) 2) That it is material constraints in this universe especially death, that prevents demons from emerging, so that intelligent life must cooperate on a universal scale to progress to become a new deity or perish.

…Then without such material constraints the Q can be turned around.

Eg what (pre God/ existence of any creation) was there to stop the first supreme being willing itself into existence?

Wheras constrained by the substance around us, humanity is forced (by logic – not by the police) to acknowledge our creator in order to progress…

…to gain control of our time & (through this) universal (God’s/ our creator’s) time, in concert with intelligent life throughout the universe.

The drive for such functioning as an incipient supreme being/ God dialectic.

But, while as (already) noted in Chapter 1, that (vis the Universalist Conception), to establish the seperation between the written secular constitution & the unwritten universal constitution (the former is intended to insure humanity prioritises everyone having enough time to comprehend); we must draw on the supra reserve of courage to enable such…

…& that therefore accomplishing this objective will be proof of the existence of a supreme being…

…The definitive answer to the Q

`Where did the first deity come from?’

Is not immediately proveable with such practical reference to humanity’s history &/ or immediate historic requirements (vis apocalyptic crisis),

& I would surmise until we are both ready for & need the answer to this Q (as a precondition for further progress), it shall continue to evade us – even as we must pursue it, to power our imagination, the warp drive of the human soul…