5 Towards The

Grand Unified Process

If you can prove the existence of a God, by proving its indispensability to the struggle of consciousness to gain hegemony over matter (intelligent lifes' mastery of itself being the pivotal event in the history of the universe) then logically, this would appear to be the natural point of departure for the Grand Unified Theory.

If the entire human race/intelligent life is to be systematically reconfigured (that is systematically upgrade itself so that it is able to establish an optimal universal equilibrium), this process (if it is not to be the most complete disaster) must follow a dialectic logic that enables this to be ultimately successful.

We must assume therefore, that there be an inbuilt program to this dialectical logic, which determines that almost every citizen would be capable of consenting/actively participating in this process, which in turn means they must be (able to be) possessed of adequate knowledge, which implies the Grand Unified Theory (or PROCESS) as a commonly understood logic (eg not the preserve of select individuals, but humanity/intelligent life as a whole).

Our hypothecation be that the evolution of the consciousness of the intelligent life be the very pivot of the universe and its laws.

To illustrate this process, finding classical Marxist theory inadequate (vis Revolution), we asked why (and what could be done). Eg the Qs proceeded from the objective (like fixing a truck). Once you consciously knew what you want (vis latent criticality, militarily-politically), it was thence a matter of piecing together the Qs tight enough for the answers to fall into place.

Within Quantum Materialism, there is a super condensed logic (similarly as has been achieved in the teaching of languages), a boiling down of everything to the most fundamental components.

Q. How to convey (key) logical structure?

The key to this is context.

Nothing can be taken/treated in isolation from anything else. In developing Quantum Materialism, I learnt as (on the basis of practical social-historical imperatives) I had to - NOT according to/on basis of an artificially constructed/ policed syllabus.

In other words, knowledge accumulation must be a consciously determined (self assembling) process and then the drive (conscious context) becomes self sustaining (and empowering).

When context is removed/prevented, disempowerment is the result and alienation seeps in and the whole process is undermined.

Eg the 1st Q (for a conscious humanity) is WHY should I learn??? (previously war/finance were the great spurs to learning - though disempowering relative fetters).

Because such an obvious/simple Q, we forget to ask it (and do not properly pick up on the answer)!

Also the current construct of society currently mitigates against it as the logical answer be empowerment; which violently conflicts with the hegemony of matter over consciousness- the regimes fear of a super proletariat - causing police function (of the state within and without education) to prevent this and deal with the consequent resulting alienation. Though it is only now in the present epoch of latent criticality that revolution and therefore, rev education (as a generalised process), has become historically viable (afterwards the common threats to human survival vis `Valhalla on earth' Vol I C1, provide the arch pol/econ/ cultural imperative).

The next Q (following on) is how should I learn?

(The process of empowerment/self education is pivotal to future development).

Thence (the new) education begins with revolution and revolution with the new education.

When the citizenry take over the process of education, they will re-engineer it, to insure that context is relevant and that therefore (following on from this that) structures/process of absorption is optimised (including the development of the philosophical machine tools of the mind, enabling citizens to find the right Qs refer back to Chapter 1 on `Valhalla on Earth')

Well at any rate, up to a point. Insofar as this can be done. There are of course limitations to the current capacity of intelligent life, beyond which the revolution in learning cannot proceed without upgrading the species' capacity for learning.

But the combination of a resultant developmental ethic, defined by the consequent individual and collective conscious awareness of consequence - (particularly as outlined in The Draft Constitution vis Article 6 and the explanation of Article 6) as opposed to the constraints of current narrow corporate self interest (in large part derived from the Grand Unified Process, with the optimisation of human potential within society and its structures), enables a situation whereby intelligent life can perpetually upgrade itself without (generalised) disastrous consequences. Eg from where we are, we can attain sufficient to move on to the next transitional stage, until we BECOME God - and become our cosmic parents and inflict the same crap on the next cosmic generation.

Knowledge Accumulation: From primitive times to the rise & fall of the war/finance nexus

Humanitys' attempt to understand (make sense of) the world (and itself), first found expression in the mythology of primitive societies.

The most curious component in such mythology was a partial or general component of evil worship, deployed in an attempt to attain/retain control over nature/man.

Gods were not wholly characterised as omnipotent and good. But either as having dualist (overtly good and overtly bad) characteristics, or sharing power (and often warring) with other gods.

It is only really when, with the Roman Empire (among the protestant Jewish Essenes and later, the Christians), the omnipotent enemy presents itself as the supreme incarnation of evil, that God is consequently seen for the first time as the unalloyed embodiment of goodness/deliverance.

Because the Roman elite could neither be displaced by a dynamic revolutionary element and nor could the Christians be destroyed, Christianity seeped up to power by osmosis. It was adopted as a tool more suited to a looser empire; based on violent dialogue - a neccessary degree of consent between elites in a system of generally fragmented power (as opposed to Caesarist omnipotence/plunder).

This (as we have seen) enabled the church to survive long after the Roman Empire was over-run.

Now overt evil worship mitigates against the fragmentation of power. So the fragmentation of power therefore required its subordination as a cryptic form - It was/is yet retained (within defacto dualist construct, within Christianity etc) due to the continuing hegemony of matter over consciousness.

HOW is this institutional incorporation of dualism within the ideological framework of the utopian dichotomy (between good & evil) manifest?

Acceptance of the hegemony of matter over consciousness, in all its forms.

As stated, lipservice is paid to the notion of human redemption - because the fragmentation of power renders Caesarist plunder (and the overt evil worship which be its' ideological accompaniment) unviable.

And yet atrocities be committed in the very name of this `redemption' (within its ideological framework). For (as stated) plunder and empire unable (as yet then) to break out of the framework of fragmentation of power (of the war/finance skein), & cannot come out openly under its own banner. Hence the Spanish Inquisition was carried out in the name of God/redemption - as to come out openly as evil worship (the tendancy of Caesarism) would antagonise all other states and be highly unnecessary anyway; open evil worship being the ideology of Caesarism proper.

Where pol/econ Caesarist pretensions did come out openly, vis Nazi Germany, such cryptic evil worship gave way to more or less overt evil worship (see the Nazi Bible).

To characterise Nazism as ever increasingly more or less overt evil worship is not to let Pius XII/Catholic Church of the hook for their support of Hitler, but rather illustrates how evil worship was contained within the construct of the utopian dichotomy as a continuum of dualism. And shall yet manifest itself in far more terrifying form if the dialectic of polycaesarism is not cut dead, before it destroys everything.

Rationalism, being the mere derivative of matter is constrained within its hegemony (as we have seen in Vol II). Dualist society's distortion of rationalism consists of the way that rationalism is executed/perverted. Eg via the hegemony of profit for profits' sake rather than the accumulation of knowledge for knowledges' sake - with finance bridled under the hegemony of civil society to serve this purpose.

Thus classical rationalism (subordinated to the hegemony of matter over consciousness - being the mere derivative of matter) is reduced to contemplating its wallet(s), from the standpoint of what makes sense for the individual corp; even though what makes sense for the individual corp amounts to collective socio pol/econ & environmental madness.

Unless fused with the immortality of the idea, rationalism is reduced to playing ball with the regime, even if here and there revolutionary conclusions are drawn (vis environmental consequences) by weak scientific radical currents. For there can be no passive resistance, ALL are forced to choose: War or Capitulation.

Subordinated to the war/finance nexus, that is its `rationalist' ideological interpretation, rationalism serves the function for dualist society that the utopian dichotomy did previously...

...And still does as an institutional reaction to classical rationalism (just as evil worship similarly institutionalised within the utopian dichotomy), because classical rationalism has failed so abysmally to establish a stable pol/econ equilibrium (impossible on basis of hegemony of matter over rationalism as seen in Vol II), this feeds into a societal shift back to holy idiocy (be it bookburning/bomb worshipping fundamentalism of one variant or another or `New Age' paganism), as a reaction to its abject failure.

Science/rationalism is a revolutionary component, but what corrupts it, is (as outlined) the continuing hegemony of matter over consciousness, the hegemony of its agenda and inability of classical rationalism within linear dialectics to seize control of the agenda.

As we have seen in Vol II, the critical component which can rescue rationalist dialectics from the hegemony of matter over consciousness is the immortality of the idea (God dialectic), which must fuse with rationalist dialectics to create the kind of movement capable of doing what must be done and enduring what must be endured, to insure that consciousness secures military - institutional hegemony over matter.

Beyond Unreason

Another curious phenonemon is UFO psychosis.

UFO psychosis is symptomatic of a feeling of a loss of control (when never actually had it anyway) of (especially) America's fear of a bigger nastier America beyond the blue yonder.

To inderstand this psychosis for what it is, it is neccessary to deconstruct the logic of UFO psychosis.

There are viewed logically, 2 potential possibilities vis extra terrestials & earth semi civilisation:

To enslave/destroy us. In which case fuck all could be done anyway (so this can be readily dismissed)

To civilise us. If this were so, the lifeform would be so advanced, that it would have developed a code of ethics which would state that it is wrong to interfere in another civilisations development (and leave well alone. If advanced enough to travel to earth, advanced enough to view without interference).

Otherwise if they civilise us, we as a species would have no self respect. We have to do this ourselves.

UFO psychosis represents a need to know everything is shit. For fear of actually taking the offensive itself. A need to capitulate to what they fear most, as if, by doing so, they hope to bargain/contain it (like a victim frequantly, helplessly does with a bully) - which they know they can't, but are trapped into this dialectic of fear - by their ultimate fear - of mobilising for all out war against the true (very earthbound & earth born) enemy.

Why should it be so surprising that (the impetus to) fragmented utopianism, here and there, gives way to fragmented despair in such forms? (Just as before there was and still is to a degree, hope in `apparitions' of the `virgin' Mary etc).

A more prosaic account for the `Roswell' and other such incidents (specifically where `revelations' have come to light) etc is that they are a load of old Psyops (CIA &/or military psychological operations) - designed to insure that radicals highlighting the role of the CIA in aiding & abetting the Italian Mafia and assorted global drug cartels, look like idiots standing (in attacking the secret police) next to anorak barmpots saying `yes, and what about the UFOs?!'

Sooner or later (on path of intelligent life becoming God), fusion between (the consciousness of) different intelligent beings must take place....

....it may even be that software based (faster than light) thought projection takes precedence over hardware based (physical) development...

....that while space travel is the be all & end all of planetary civilisation, such conscious linkage therefore is neccessary to prevent massively wasteful parrallel development (by different worlds - in which the same shitty struggle has been played out & overcome), so that different galactic components can play their seperate roles within a common plan (or else the odds appear stacked against intelligent life gaining physical hegemony over & re-engineering the universe).

For reasons already mentioned, initial contact (presumably via super fast laser/ light projection or the like - thought transference being highly sexual/ intimate would go down very badly if no prior culture of consent has been developed between spatial races & within those same races) can only be established once intelligent life has reached a level of development that can only be attained once it has mastered itself (this also would be the precondition for thought projection being developed beyond the pathetically episodic as occasionally sheepishly claimed from limited, inconclusive & unconvincing ESP tests - or `thought colonisation', between individuals, would be a grave factor/ spell totally unavoidable global destruction)....

From then on unlikely to be `either or' but progress led by symbiotic development of physical hardware & intellectual media (thought projection & light projection)

* The author categorically refuses to accept responsibility for any future Jerry Springer show entitled `I left my hubby for brain sex with an alien'

The Mind of God

As to the Q `if there is a God why is there so much suffering in the world? And HOW can you claim as you do, that vis Christianity/ Islam etc, there WAS (& IS) a manifestation of a God dialectic, yet SUBORDINATE to the hegemony of matter over consciousness? HOW can God allow itself to be arsed about in this unholy fashion?'

Consciousness springs forth from (cosmic) dust (not even shit), & through an accretion of knowledge (aided by supra reserve of courage - vis the new rev theory & its deployment), a super critcality is attained, enabling (through martyrs sacrifice/ re-inforcement- as the sun gives life to the earth) the hegemony of consciousness over matter to arise & humanity to become God.

But you cannot point to as direct conclusive proof of God's existence the wonder `miracle' of nature in say, a leaf or tree (nature - eg the oft phrase `...isn't life miraculous? A God MUST have made it.'). For such an approach leads down the road of projecting a vision of an ALL controlling deity, every action/ event etc the product of an enslaved/ enslaving fatalism - rather than ultimate control of process, through aiding (via supra reserve of courage) human consciousness/ knowledge to attain through exercise of FREE WILL hegemony over matter - as an independant FREE entity/ agency (rather than the sordid plaything of a celestial Saddam Hussein).

Creation (the act of) was a work of art NOT of science.

Scientific knowledge/ consciousness grows out of it as an independant agency, drawing on the supra reserve of courage to enable it to attain hegemony over matter. And so thence become God, replicating the process. Art thence remains WITHIN this consciousness, the ultimate flowering (via scientific knowledge) of art.

Such be the dialectic of the Philosophical Revolution, that must (further) jet fuel the struggle for intelligent life/ consciousness to gain hegemony over matter/ freeing itself once & for all from the primordial sludge....

For God, Commonwealth & Freedom...

Doubtless many classical materialists will accuse the author of a brutal re-working of the `Jesus wants me for a sunbeam' theme. The only response possible to this is to refer all suchlike back to (Chapter 1 Vol I) the section on the clash between the communist view of death & the fascist view of death.

The Birth of the New Philosophy

All previous philosophical advances/discoveries eg Marxism (an outgrowth of Hegelianism) were based on/sprung forth from esoteric academia.

But all the new fields of the new philosophy must be soldier led. That is uncovered by those actually willing to deploy them.

Therefore as with the legend of Excalibur, only those willing to deploy the new theory for its logical purpose, are able to uncover it.

While my work is, broadly, technically accurate and does represent a decisive historic advance - you will also, cannot help but, notice the crudity/coarseness of it - borne from a soldier driven practicality - To hone in on, cover and deal with the key points as quickly as possible. With all the advantages & disadvantages that entails.

I should state that I have absolutely no illusions whatever about my limited abilities (giant though these historic breakthroughs are) either as a street academic or as a soldier. This theory therefore, can, must, WILL be refined by others.

Yet it is precisely in the unexceptional character of my abilities that is to be found my ace of spades. I am no field marshall, I am something much, much more awesome. I am the prototype rank and file revolutionary of the future.

I have it within my power to overthrow every tyrant on the face of the earth - as does everyone else.

As a historic stage of (potential) development, the age of the superman is here - of (human) consciousness gaining hegemony over matter through blood sacrifice.

Final Conclusion

It was not Marxism's atheism which caused its' ineffectualness. But rather its' operational ineffectualness (-subordinated to capitalist hegemony as elaborated) which was the foundation of its' atheism (though still philosophically, an advance on the anthroprocentric God concepts which preceeded it).

Simply, Marxism did not possess the operational theory/weaponry which needed a (general) martyr driven means of propagation - which in turn requires the God dialectic.

Nor indeed could it possess this theory before all potential for automatic development had been exhausted - causing FREE WILL to be raised from a secondary factor, to the PRINCIPLE factor of historical development - that shall decide the fate of humanity - in the era of global finance hegemony & decomposition.

God is not a talisman for the superstitious and/or those that wish to avoid conflict, for liberals, to comfort the cowardly in flight from duty. God is a military weapon.

Quantum Materialism

The Next Generation

The Last Nail

The last great conservative fortification is mathematics. Not because it is conservative - but merely because the revolution has thus far failed to prove itself mathematically - leaving room to imagine that there may be some `higher' concept.

This must be resolved. And the new philosophy demonstrated, proven, refined in mathematical form. That we leave to the enemy nothing - not one blade of grass to retreat behind.

To this end, it be neccessary to throw out the challenge to prove/disprove mathematically, the new philosophy. To foster a theoretical feeding frenzy (among the scientific intelligentsia) `from above', fusing with the mass dialectic/movement from below - Creating a pincer movement, and the maximum panic in the very heart of the enemy camp.

As for the Q, who created God/ how did it come into being (eg the first in the line of cosmic generations)? This is a Q for the mathmaticians to. The mere proof of a deity's existence, as illustrated in this work, may be sufficient to get us to the stage of development consciousness gaining hegemony over matter, but we are certain to come up against this Q somewhere along the line.

But philosophy must be a practical discipline, or it is worthless. Eg I am only a philosopher insofaras/ because I couldn't avoid being one, as determined by practical neccessities. Eg vis the need for the immortality of the idea, to enable consciousness to gain hegemony over matter.

I surmise therefore, that the answer to the Q `who created God?' (which be as old as the most primitive of God concepts), will only be resolved when intelligent life cannot progress without an answer to this Q.

Quantum Materialism

The Next Generation

The next generation of Quantum Materialist theoroticians (following Einstein's surmise that a given individual is capable of only one great revolution in their lifetime, I am no mathmatician & doubtless will not have the time to learn sufficient to carry this theory into mathmatical form) -

- Should think of (evolution of matter & ideas derived from this matter - including with the immortality of the idea as a factor in dirivng forward the evolution of said factors) logic as analagous to a computer program & degenerative anti logic (curiously intrinsic to the evolution of logic itself - eg note the role of the Nazis as a negative stimulus to geo rev reform, in driving down wages so that reconfigurated capitalist global pol/econ could, benefiting from this starting point generate its own boom; as the radicals were the positive stimulus... & the threat of military plutocratic oblivion which is neccessary to drive our revolution forward) as a viruses affecting (& evolving with) the system AS the system develops.

That it be a battle to (overcome especially key aspects of this anti logic) progress (to the point at which consciousness has attained hegemony over matter) BEFORE the whole system of development crashes.