Adam Ghaznavi

42 Ivydale Road

London SE15 3BS

0207 450 6437

12 July 05

MI5

The Enquiries Desk

PO Box 3255

London SW1P 1AE

Dear MI5,

Re: Anti Terror info

I hesitate to give you this somewhat ancient info, because it is not much & will be infuriatingly hard to make use of (& am most reluctant to waste your time).

On Sept 28th 2002 Stop the War demo, I got into an argument with a western dressed fundamentalist who intimated that he had undergone military training.

Basically, I was on the demo to hand out leaflets for websites for the latest anti apocalyptic revolutionary paradigm I was developing – aimed at taking on classical fascism, Islamic fascism & USA caesarism in an integrated fashion.

I was walking around the Embankment handing out leaflets & was dressed in black army jumper, black jeans & shoes, carrying a black hold all, alternately slung around my neck/ shoulder – in which I carried my (black & white) leaflets printed on A4 paper, holding a batch in my left hand, handing them out with my right.

Invoking people to `prepare for the fallout from Arafats’ murder’ (before his death in mysterious circumstances – when his removal presumably then by direct assassination looked inevitable at some stage).

The only way to ID the person concerned is through CCTV, if such be available from the time (I would recognise the incident, but not the individual).

To this end I also enclose a contempory photo of myself from the time, so that if you have facial mapping software able to trawl rapidly through the crowds, you might be able to locate (through me) the individual/ group concerned etc (maybe there are fewer than 7 degrees of seperation from the Tube/ bus attacks).

I exchanged leaflets with said gentleman – who seemed interested that I was computer literate, & drew attention to the websites on the leaflet he handed me (unfortunately I was so busy handing out more leaflets I just nodded politely, & said leaflet got thrown out with the rest of the detritus accumulated from the demo – without me noting any further info related to such).

Moments later he or one of his colleagues (that I had handed one of my leaflets to) angrily handed back the leaflet – taking exception at the term `Islamic fascism’.

The psychology of the situation was such, that I instinctively sensed I had to stand my ground & make it clear I would defend my position; or else in handing out leaflets to others I would both feel psychologically weak & likely to be pursued as someone stirring up `Islamophobia’ if I did not make it clear I was prepared to defend my ideas etc.

I raised the issue of Saudi Arabia/ Afghanistan & women’s rights etc,

`Would (I) like to meet the sisters & see how oppressed they are’ (he said).

I made as a revolutionary an admittedly lame comment about lack of elections.

He said `You are all over the place, changing the subject from one point to another’

To my point about reflecting tendancies that can recognisibly be called Islamic fascism, he responded that Islam is not nationalistic.

To which I responded what about extreme rightwing Catholicism as a supranational ideology.

He said as a socialist I had blood on my hands – I responded that we all (every political tendancy has) have blood on our hands…

I was then asked what I was doing about Palestine & (immediately) told I was doing nothing for the Palestinians.

I then outlined my gameplan (as then was, pre USA having actually committed troops to battle in Iraq, which meant I had to hedge my approach as to how things would develop – as so obvious the war would be lost, if USA troops so committed, I thought they would probably use proxies…).

Pre Sept 11th I had been geared up to the idea that the global speculative finance/ credit expansion propelled USA budget/ trade deficit would lead to dollar collapse/ soaring interest rates/ global credit crunch/ hyperinflation & geo pol/econ tailspin collapsing the Ulster peaceboom leading to war gathering its own momentum, spilling over onto the mainland & merging with Tory anti EU political warlordism (the right to commit genocide within our own borders) – the need to combat such via paramilitary attacks on classical fascist formations (military & political), & take the attack to the enemy via a rev pol campaign held together as a continuous process by antifascist hunger strikers (as focal point of the campaign – enabling the delegitimisation of the regime/ continuous martialing of forces) – re-inforced by parliamentary wing in event of elections being called to relegitimise the regime/ fraction of such.

As this would only work on a European scale, to establish a Euro Commonwealth of the regions eclipsing the nation state (too weak to establish civil society hegemony over global finance – yet too big to be a peaceful region) & defined for a Global Commonwealth Confederation to contain the threat from USA caesarism etc in turn defined for the Green Revolution (wartime sacrifices for solar powered desalination to quench the thirst for revenge from the 3rd world/ stabilise the immigration Q by aiding development of 3rd world), this necessitated the export of the methodology by British antifascists via Battle of Berlin to fix the centre of gravity of Euro Commonwealth be breaking the threat where most feared in Europe (paradoxically as Germany afraid Germany, it would only be the British awakening the Germanic regions to their historic role as backbone of Euro Commonwealth, leading Europe, leading the world, which would psycho politically enable them to so take the initiative).

I had (pre Sept 11th 2001) partially developed/ regeared to a subscenario whereby anticipated explosive growth of BNP in April 2002 local elections necessitated a containing/ pre-emptive strike in case of major electoral breakthrough (otherwise the combination of a major advance combined with economic tailspin would have threatened a (psycho) military political rout; if not contained be a position prepared before the geo pol/econ crash.

Of course Sept 11th cut across everything anyway, the changed psycho political focus decisively shifting attention away from USA budget/ trade deficit (finance scandals/ crises feeding of themselves & merging into a single firestorm catalysing meltdown), the Ulster Q became a backwater, & the new conditions did not permit the BNP to raise the stake required to play the ultimate game - establishing a paradoxical period of apocalyptic stability.

Indeed since 1999 when I first came up with the Ulster centred model; since Sept 11th, increased/ unsustainable immigration flows

(as a result of global econ/ imperial trade imbalances combined with the difficulties of developing especially Africa by conventional methods of development – as its vast grindingly inaccessible/ destabilising interior really requires solar powered desalination based model enabling energy/ info/ water in freestanding units, not overly dependant on a conventional infrastructure; indeed the precondition for developing such, as if you were colonising a new planet)

(& corresponding clash of indigenous/ imported parochialisms) & the Iraq war has so absorbed British/ western psychology, it is increasingly inconceivable that Republicans be increasingly smashed & then classical fascists shift focus towards ethnic minorities. Rather the latter so absorb the classical fascist focus, that Loyalists stuck on their own without any state support & driven out by the irish army. This is of course excessively optimistic as geo pol/econ collapse/ primal panic will have led to social liquifaction before such stately ambitions can be realised.

From that day you could no longer target classical fascism without dealing with Islamic fascism – which you could not deal with unless you could operationally target USA caesarism – wheras before, it was impossible to make an issue of Islamic or revanchist 3rd world fascism (except as an exotic possibility. Eg when Bush savagely bombed Iraq a day or two after taking office, Saddam Hussein threatened a `military response’ – to which the foot & mouth outbreak seemed unfortunately chronologically aligned).

Well, after USA troops had been consigned to Iraq (I originally expected use of proxies & was certainly not prepared to make assumptions based on the USA led quagmire option until they were actually stuck there), it then became possible to envisage how the collapse of USA’s position would lead to oil being turned off/ primal panic/ race war & therefore the need to target the universities/ establishment itself with the idea of establishing a new centre/ global security architecture based on British troops being sent to hold the line in Israel/ Palestine, as most of the 1967 territories handed over, the last section held back until Pakistan (against backdrop of British nuke disarmament) to destroy half its nukes (to deliver a blow to Islamic fascist psychology, reassuring Israel of its security, allowing it to stop riding the expansionist tiger aided by USA bombworshippers). If it agrees & then (after Israel hands back the last section) renages, it is threatened by Hindu fascism in India. If it does so, it gets leadership of the global commonwealth confederation (destroying remainder of its nukes), enabling it to negotiate reunification with India base on the breaking of Hindu fascist psychology via:

1) Rebuilding Ayodhya Barbary Mosque.

2) South Asian troops on USA soil leading the global monitoring of all nuke installations, insuring that:

3) USA visionary expansionism eclipses USA imperial/ apocalyptic expansionism; through the commitment of all resources to (global wartime sacrifices for) developing solar powered desalination; an issue critical to the jugular of India, the glacial river Ganges (being undermined by global warming/ carbon emissions) – & also vis global energy security.

Also critical to Africa’s development, enabling that Africa to be our global insurance policy in event of gulf stream being flooded by freshwater from polar caps/ turned off.

4) If USA refuses to comply, the emergent Medina Commonwealth (a united oil superpower with no need of nukes as such actually create intense suspicion between its peoples) turns the oil off.

Such that all apocalyptic threats are balanced off against each other; like bricks in an arch, stabilising each other…

This entails horrendous factors such as Britain manifestly demonstrating it has sufficiently burnt bridges with any delusional idea of trying to permanently prop up the old military plutocratic order…

(even though by definition the Revolution is dependant on the remnants of the old order to hold things together for just long enough to allow the revolution settlement to kick in, as the old order itself can only hold things together aided by the transitional global legitimacy of the emergent revolution framework/ settlement, which means the plug is not pulled for just long enough to enable said revolution settlement to kick in)

…to win just enough confidence with both Israelis/ Palestinians that it can restrain both the tendancy to drive Israel into the sea & Israeli missile command (it is a fascinating general characteristic of this epoch, that the balance of opposing threat configurations have the tendancy to flip dramatically from one to the other & back again etc as we spiral down into the abyss).

To do this it needs the trial/ execution of key figures necessary to convince the Palestinians etc of its bona fides…

(without which the Palestinians would be willing to have British troops administer the handover of the 1967 lands, but not subject to the necessary caveats necessary to underpin both Israel’s legitimate security interests via establishment of a new global security architecture – this in turn would make certain a slide into anarchy as British troops would have no authority, no time & space within Palestinian/ Arab minds to restrain them from a process leading to them driving Israel into the sea/ Israeli missile command pre-emptively responding)

…including the political commander (who as we shall see later must be executed to consolidate this process) of this process executing (or murdering a part of everyone of 60 million British people/ if not the world) the Crown - But NOT British troops/ army figures whose blood responsibility (for Iraq war etc) is correspondingly also shared with the political commander of British troops leading this process (who as we shall see later must be executed to consolidate this process).

This is not really a conventional criminal or political trial along the lines of Nuremburg trial or the like at all. Rather it is about explaining how we finally came to this pass over 10,000 years of the war finance nexus, whereby the only way humanity can gain mastery over itself/ its own destiny is propelled by the very threat of annihilation that we face. But for humanity to move beyond hegemonic control of war/ finance nexus some of us have to except our tragic responsibility in order for humanity to accept responsibility for its destiny…

So that if the order is given to open fire on Palestinians rushing the last area/ Israel proper, they have (which they otherwise would not) just enough time/ space within the minds of the Palestinians that this does not trigger all out meltdown/ Israeli missile command, but instead leads to the trial of said political commander (as indeed it must for preventing the Palestinians reclaiming their land which at one & the same time is both imperative to prevent tailspin into oblivion, & given Britain’s role in the region an albeit necessary crime. The Iranians can be trusted to lead this process, as their position is most vulnerable without replacement security gaurentee) – sentence of death delayed for 100 days to give time for the 3rd trial, of all humanity itself.

With said political commander going on hunger strike, challenging humanity with the threat of meltdown to come out onto the streets to endorse the new global security architecture

(The Battle of Jerusalem decisively shifting the focus from the military to the psycho political – the mothers being the vanguard/ moral force best placed to lead this process, enabling the eclipse of the paradox of arms, that we need the right to bear arms to keep in check a potential resurgent nuclear/ military plutocratic tyranny but to be effective this right must not actually be used, therefore, the mothers as the decisive vanguard/ moral force in the world enable the resolution of this paradox – eg the calculus of all force from the state, paramilitary/ even vigilante, to avoid chaos, must from the beginning all be gyro stabilised by this Jerusalem centred focus – eg force is only of value in that it keeps hostile factions apart for just long enough to allow the revolution settlement to kick in – afterwards fear of chaos keeps everyone animated to doing what needs must – until progressed enough to go on into the philosophical/ cultural sunlit uplands – paradoxically it will be precisely this most terrifying epoch in human history that will make humanity really appreciate objectives cast far beyond itself as an exhilarating/ stabilising factor – from contacting other worlds, to intelligent life actually becoming God, our cosmic parents & visiting the same crap on the next cosmic generation. In this from the beginning, the key cultural priority of social organisation being time to think/ learn – defined by the iverarhing culture of the common threats/ objectives confronting all humanity; control over our time leading to control over universal time – the cultural basis for hegemony of civil society/ consciousness over finance/ matter; nothing is more unstable/ unviable than equality as an end in itself, lacking even the connecting bonds of war/ finance nexus)

– underpinning the emergent global constitutional pol/econ framework (held together via culture of common threats/ objectives confronting all humanity) on pain of an inexorable slide into oblivion if they do not.

If they do, then as mandated global president, said political commander oversees (or at any rate remains alive, a la Tito, if needs must) the process for a maximum of 100 more days until Israel hands over last of 1967 territories & Pakistan destroys half its nukes – leading to formal handover of power to Pakistans’ nominated figure as new global president & corresponding public beheading of previous said global president/ political commander of British troops (now under Global Commonwealth Confederal control with representative contingents from around the world) - the global psychic shock (as well as legal imperative, to show no one is above law) of which helps to consolidate the new order/ agenda (preventing 4 billion years of earth evolution being flushed down the toilet), a rolling process beginning with destruction of remainder of Pakistans’ nukes & ultimately as Medina Commonwealth is threatened by self destruction through religious war over the cultural vortices of Mecca & Medina (too powerful for any small state to control – hence the alliance between the Saudi state & the most reactionary clergy to cover their religious flank), Israeli nuclear disarmament (at a time of Israel’s choosing) is imperative so that Sunni & Shia will accept Jewish administration of Mecca to prevent the fratricidal destruction of the oil superstate (as Muslims administer the Holy Sepulchre in Jerusalem) – this is Israel’s passport to security, that Israel is actually integral/ indispensible to the stability of a united Medina (oil superpower) superstate, which paradoxically can only be united on a secular basis – providing stable supplies of expensive oil, further propelling development of solar powered desalination.

Enabling decentralist development, substantive sovereignty of the individual & a corresponding focus on womens’ rights/ education stabilising the explosive demographic Q which entrenches poverty/ resentment & broadens/ deepens the tendancy to psycho political transference - the refusal of Islamic fascists to admit their part in their pact with imperial hegemony which trashed their countries, leading to a self righteous apocalyptic nihilism mirroring our own consumptive destruction.

Of course, this model is ONLY applicable when either USA position collapses completely leading to Israel taking independent initiative in a desperate attempt to gaurentee its own security with destruction of Dome of the Rock (leading to global meltdown), or more likely, when present period of USA introversion leads to focus on (global speculative finance/ credit expansionary propelled) USA trade/ budget deficit & the lack of any idea about how to deal with the crisis at any & every level by those seeking retreat from Iraq; leads by default to God’s anointed regaining control of the military political agenda, to one mad attack on Iran by USA (& a mad attack on the Dome of the Rock by Israel) – as much as anything, to `bring on the Rapture’.

THEN & ONLY THEN (with humanity desperate for order at any price) will my strategic gameplan/ model be ready, or in any way the conditions ripe for deployment. Hence (whatever their inclinations/ dangerous impulses), while appropriately cautious, I no longer view the auld enemy as the enemy anymore – when set against the greater picture of 4 billion years of earth evolution, the potential of humanity finally mastering itself or annihilating itself; which will be decided on the turn of a single card, at the Battle of Jerusalem.

…Obviously the fewer bombs in Britain/ USA etc adulterating the `good anarchy’ with `bad anarchy’, the better…

Well, I was thence 28/9/02 caught between major paradigms. The battle of Jerusalem model could not yet thence be developed. & the Ulster/ BNP centred model was now out of date. So it resembled more the former, but like a car without an engine…

I said something like:

In the context of the geo pol/econ tailspin, (mobilised) Asian women function as a tactical reserve cutting the ground materially from Islamic fascists (eg either they accept this fact that eclipses their power or else be caught in open conflict with same) & politically from classical fascists – enabling their containment/ repression stabilising the situation internally so that….

Aggressive British nuke disarmament marginalizes USA Caesarism & thus enables Britain to act as geo strategic point of support to enable Pakistan nuke disarmament marginalizing Hindu fascism in power enabling its repression, Britain/ Europe able to get the oil turned back on by holding global centre/ balance of power for solar powered desalination, placing Israel under European protection within 1967 borders, thus outflanking/ enabling the overthrow of USA caesarism.

(To avoid replicating major works, these are very truncated outlines – though even then the second outline, which contains some material currently under development is unavoidably sprawling out of control here - eg the Q of USA rapture Psychology, response to use of nuke weapons etc is contained in main works)

To which he responded `this is just intellectual masturbation, you’re not doing anything’.

I responded that as the purpose was to capture the universities (the only institutions capable of providing organising focus for broadest sectors of civil society in context of geo pol/econ collapse), I was (there) trying to sow the seeds of a movement that would germinate only when conditions ripened.

He then asked if I had undergone military training – I responded that I had not, his responsive (contemptuous but without too much bragadacio) bearing such, that he considered this the clincher, leaving little doubt he had undergone such himself. The wet spaghetti western psychology of the moment made it seem inappropriate/ effeminate to actually ask (towards the end of the disputation, one of his colleagues scrunched another leaflet of mine up & threw it with impressive force at the left side of my head).

I wondered at the time about saying anything to anyone, yet considered that there was not much to go on. Perhaps boastful sounding words that could be dismissed, indeed dependant upon a degree of interpretation. Furthermore the wests’ support for Islamic fascists in Afghanistan (& elsewhere) seemed to muddy the issue (particularly Leila Helms advocacy for the Taliban up to 3 weeks before Sept 11th 2001); so what would I be reporting exactly? An internal security threat (going against the established culture of the covenant) or Islamic fascist holidaymaker/ international brigade & if so in what context?

All complicated further by the factor that if it came to discussion of clear internal security Qs, I knew my intentions/ personal history, concluding I was potentially of interest, but did not know he was, so this might have in any case overshadowed any such potential issue relating to him anyway.

But events have burnt of the haze surrounding this Q, throwing it into sharper relief…

You have my express permission to copy/ spread/ share this info with whomsoever you choose.

Yours Sincerely

Adam Ghaznavi