Substance Over Form

Vol VI

Logic Red In Tooth & Claw

The Struggle

To Master Time - Space

(By Adam Ghaznavi)

1 A Duel To The Death

The Historical Liquidation

of the Apocalypse Legends

2 A Voyage Across The Universe

Of One's Own Ignorance

# 3 Logic Red In Tooth In Claw

A Duel To The Death

The Historical Liquidation

of the Apocalypse Legends

I have hitherto resisted the impulse to write how this theory has been developed as I cannot even keep up to date the material in volumes 1, 2 & 4 Of `Substance Over Form' (as constraints of time require me to prioritise the gameplan. general outline of Vol III - informed by the ultra condensed deep theory of Vol V).

Therefore if I cannot even keep all existing works up to date, to produce a 6th volume explaining the processes of keeping everything up to date is clearly not viable...

But every now & then, a Q or previous error will manifest itself, such that failure to deal with such fatally blocks all further progress.

Now this can be at the overt (political) technological level (eg the ned to simaltaneously assault all apocalyptic parochialisms in a fully integrated fashion from the beginning - something that was in any case possible post Sept 11th)...

...But it can also be psychological. Failure to measure up to the moment, to deal with the challenge of a particular instant can threaten to wipe everything out. Reduce all to zero. So it can be with past errors.

Now normally (fortunately) it is just a Q of dealing with reasons for not having developed further this or that concept or explaining reasons for extreme caution (such as why I refused until USA actually engaged in the Iraq warto fully commit my gamepln to the assumption that war would take place. Instead (in `Excalibur-op4') attempted to cover a broad range of (albeit less developed) scenarios; to avoid being caught cold...

So the Q arises what on earth possessed me to write (note especially text in red):

Saddam Hussein,

The Political Samson Option

& The World Revolution

2000 years ago in Jerusalem, an insurgent leader (rather more likeable politically & personally than saddam Hussein) asked one of his trusted followers to set him up for capture (with a kiss) by the temple authorities; their collaboration with Rome would be indicted, in order to serve as a focus for/ pave the way for a general uprising of.

Eg if Jesus was martyred by the authorities, they would be delegitimised. If set free, then Jesus would defacto be the supreme political leader, with authority to command a revolt.

It didn't work. The Jewish authorities handed Jesus over to Roman power. Rome (in the shape of Pontius Pilate) did dare face down the threat of insurgency (as shown later in the Jewish revolt of 72 A.D.); had the will to tough it out, as well as the armour.

The original blood libel/ garbage about Jesus being `murdered by the Jews' (who, for some strange reason no apologist for this libel seems to have noticed, was subject to a specifically Roman means of execution, crucifixion) was of course to spare Caesar Constantine the embarressment of his predeccessors being proclaimed `deicides' in the censored version of the Bible by the rising religion Constantine sought to establish a strategic pact with. Hence the laughably benign portrayal of `merciful' Pontius Pilate.

But the Americans have feet of clay & everybody knows it. The antiwestern forces in Iraq (a mixture of Saddamites/ Islamic fascists & also secular nationalists that hated Saddam Hussein - long before the western arms dealers gave them permission to do so) are not defeated. & everybody knows it.

Consequantly it is completely irrelevant wether Saddam Hussein is (in allowing himself to be captured) the big girl's blouse he is generally being made out to be, or wether he is playing an extremely deep game, allowing himself to be caught at an optimal time in order to sucker the USA empire into a global legitimacy crisis...

...the reappearance of Saddam Hussein (the Americans tipped of by a member of saddam Husseins' family; to be sure this is short term at least, a major psychological boost to the empire), means the USA led military plutocracy daren't just dispose of him without a trial; in an attempt to strengthen the credibility of their puppet regime (of course if they do not hang him this looks like fatal weakness/ foments the collapse of their control).

NOT when they claim to be in Iraq to establish the rule of law against a tyrant THEY originally installed in the first place - which fact negates any right to conduct summary field tribunal/ execution; as the command responsibility goes up the food chain to the USA led military plutocratic elite itself.

Saddam Hussein is not plotting his comeback. There can be no uprising to re-install a monster who monstered to murderously for the USA led military plutocracy (when it suited them).

Instead at his trial...

...if he is not allowed/ able to speak, if he is drugged, there will be plenty of people to voice the fact that he so murderously aided by the USA led imperial agenda

Saddam Hussein was the CIA's monster, repressing not only his own radicals (beginning with the slaughter of 16,000 Communists on a death list given him by the CIA), but also at CIA instigation through initiating war with Iran (attempted annexation of the Shat al Arab, helping to consolidate a fascist elite there clinging to power through attritional war which, as both sides needed to fund their war efforts, both sides maximised output of oil which kept the oil price low, until the war ended & USA military plutocracy encouraged Kuwait to drill under the Iraqi border, by `refusing to get involved in border disputes' to quote April Glaspie, which can only be read as encouraging Kuwait in it's provocation, as the war which was forced on Iraq/ gave a pretext for USA military plutocracy to bludgeon the monster they created & a couple of million or so people to death, to insure no long term threat to their imperial interests in the region - militarily (especially nuke proliferation), politically or economically.

Moreover this USA led military plutocratic objective of regional control is why the Iranian secular leftwing democrat Mossadegh had to be overthrown by the CIA/ MI6, who installed the Shah, why Islamic fascist regimes in Saudi Arabia/ throughout the mideast were the USA regimes favorite weapon of choice to butcher communists/ secular leftwing democrats.

To prevent any independant pol/econ policy being developed which threatened USA military plutocratic elite interests regionally or globally, by lesser breeds without the law, that possess no right to protection from a single global constitution & legal framework covering all humanity & holding all accountable before it.

This general purpose operation also intimidated surrounding regimes which kept the oil price low.

...- in fact if he so fails to make said points, eg if drugged, such points will be equally conspicuous by their abscence - as if he had said them himself.

Saddam Hussein shall simply aim to drag the entire USA led military plutocratic empire to hell with him. In fact, by indicting him for following their orders, the USA led military plutocrats have already condemned themselves, as they bear ultimate command responsibility.

Indeed USA regime can only continue to distance themselves from the crimes of Saddam Hussein regime, if there is no elected Iraqi govt possessing legitimacy, saying `we are not responsible for debts incurred, USA regime installed him' & only a puppet regime possessing no legitimacy; & therefore entirely (& correspondingly uselessly, in terms of containing USA Casualties) dependant on USA regime...

...& it be clear that all (4 main) permutations…
eg:

a) A puppet Iraq govt (causing even the Shia to rise up en masse)

b) An elected Iraq govt the USA resists/ undermines the soveriegnty of (leading to general rebellion among Shia), or:

c) An elected Iraq govt that USA are before the whole world compelled to concede ground (to avoid mass troop casualties) sufficient to underpin said Iraq govt.s' credibility....

d) (Even) The Iranian revolution (partially kept in check at the time of writing 2/2/04, by Ayatollahs able to exploit Nationalist sentiment to USA imperial led threats against Iran) will create a feeling of `see we can sort things out ourselves', so that USA opposition to Iraqi shia tearing up privitisations will fuel an aggressive backlash. & again, wether USA leaves peacefully or driven out, the Saudi regime will be fatally geo psychologically weakened...

...fatally weakens USA (geo psycho political) position in Saudi Arabia…

Vis Saudi Arabia, collapse/ deposition of the Saudi regime, even if initially led by semi secularists, means Saudi Arabia increasingly prone to call for Jihad/ war to liberate Palestine, triggering pre-emptive Israeli strike/ cessation of oil supplies (even if the westerners hadn't all fled already)...

...Especially given that even if secularists initially gain control, Al Qaeda elements will have been involved in the fighting/ have access to all the arms we sold the Royal tyrants & vis oil price Q; both trigger USA interference (which Al Qaeda will actually want, to secure control of the internal/ regional agenda). & any USA interference whatsoever will foment massive backlash...

...Furthermore the 100% inevitable arming of the Palestinians with all the hightech kit Thatcher & co (on behalf of us all) sold Saudi, will not go unnoticed by Israeli missile command...

… leads to collapse of regime, leading to cessation of oil supplies leading to complete geo pol/econ meltdown/ politics of the last bullet & race war/ primal panic/ anarchy in Britain/ worldwide...

...& while it is certainly true that there is a certain potential for development of Iraq with the abandonment of the expense of a nat sec state in defiance of USA imperial will, to raise living standards...

...As either acqueisence to USA (by Iraqis/ Arab peoples in general) increases Israeli settler hubris or, the driving out of USA forces increases Israeli's sense that (in the abscence of some other large protector/ gaurentor of It’s security within the framework of a viable regional/ global settlement/ constitution, eg a revolutionary Europe, by default) it must take independant initiative (against any emerging threat to its' security - eg invading the maelstrom of post Royal Saudi Arabia)...

...Against backdrop of the conflict between USA/ Iraqi state over the price of oil (to fund Iraqi development on one hand and offset USA trade deficit on the other), a flashpoint merger of the Q of price of oil with Palestinian Q is certain at some point.

…The crisis of legitimacy detonated by said judicial/ televisual Gotterdamerung, will spell the real beginning of the end of the USA empire & ignite a conscious craving on the part of increasing swathes of humanity for a single geo pol/econ constitutional & legal framework gaurenteeing the legitimate security interests of all humanity & holding all accountable before it. The lack of such shall simply cease to be acceptable, even in the first world.

But that is not all. For the crash of USA empires' pseudo legitimacy will set fire to the whole world. The 3rd world Islamic fascists/ revanchist dynamic sensing psycho - organically the changed environment, will succeed in driving the westerners from Saudi Arabia & catalyse the geo pol/econ collapse/ chaos; such that in Britain, the (racialised) politics of the last bullet will threaten wholesale anarchy/ primal panic.

Now it might be argued that (aforementioned) oil largesse makes possible proxy intervention (under USA control) that would eclipse the global legitimcay Q, thus restabilising (through cheap oil) the military plutocratic system......

Eg destabilisation of Iraqi Kurdistan producing a drive for independance, triggering Turkish intervention (to prevent cessation of Turkish Kurdistan) & occuppation of the region correspondingly causing Iran (Turkey's rival) to occuppy southern (Shia) Iraq (eg the internal military geo political initiative in Iran shifts to prowestern tendancies in the Iranian state, seeking such an option under USA imperial aegis).

......but the fact that such intervention by proxy forces can only be engaged after USA defeat......

...means that USA empire does not decisively call the shots...

...means that disputes over the largesse destabilise all adjoining (proxy force) intervening states (not to mention the renewed rise/ re-occurence of Islamic fascism including in the intervening states themselves) subjecting them to (internal) pol/econ overstretch...

Eg USA cannot (for long) use the exotic approach of exploiting its own weakness to (mobilise states/ peoples to) hold the centre (on basis of its' hegemony).

Because ultimately such an exotic approach/ mechanism can only really work if all global civil society is pro-actively engaged; because preserving the centre (ever more clearly) serves their mutual long term interests (as outlined in `Communique Number 1' in` Lucifer2.zip') this can be made to work for the Revolution (but not the military plutocratic elites,) of their actively engaged civil societies in the context of a single global constitutional framework/ framework of global reconstruction...

Furthermore, Blair's embrace of the (Iraqi) quagmire option post Sept 11th has actually prevented use of nukes by USA regime UNTIL the current option becomes so manifestly unviable, that collapse of USA led imperial centre in mideast....

...leading to cessation of oil supplies & corresponding geo pol/econ political nuclear chain reaction propels an overtly historically suicidal logic...

...eg Israeli invasion of Saudi Arabia leading to conflict with USA over price of oil, then nuke war (by USA bomb worshippers) to usher in the reign of King Jesus a la Revelations 7:4 & punish the Jews for their failure to deliver on the oil, a manifestation of their perfidious refusal to acknowledge King Jesus...

...Means that any future use of nukes would come AFTER a manifest geo psycho political defeat. So that it would correspondingly be impossible for use of nukes to function as a means to temporarily stabilise USA imperial control of the geo psycho pol/econ agenda...

...eg through nuke terror initiate the carve up of Iraq between Turkey & a westernised Iran (as mentioned earlier) proxy forces under USA aegis to supply cheap oil to offset the USA trade deficit - until the internal hubristic specualtive financier/ credit expansionist plunder outweighs the capacity of external plunder to prevent the entire USA led military plutocratic system imploding).

Eg as the shock comes after the manifest failure of the USA psycho political centre, it actually would compound the sense of unfolding chaos/ descent into primal panic. in the way that if the World Trade Centre attack/ imperial war had come after the Enronisation of the entire pol/econ had been revealed, then this would not have had the psycho political effect of having stabilised the USA military plutocratic elite control of the geo pol/econ (eg the psycho political focus is shifted sufficiently to the war to act as a temporary firebreak until the whole rotten edifice comes crashing down), but fomented descent into primal panic...

Indeed curious to note that while September 11th provided a pretext for Iraq war & to retain control of the geo psycho pol/econ agenda, Sept 11th had also made it paradoxically much more difficult to instigate the carve up of Iraq (between Turkey & Iran) WITHOUT USA becoming (much more prone to be) directly & ruinously involved; as a result of Blair standing `shoulder to shoulder' (an offer that could not be refused by USA regime without ceding control of the entire geo psycho pol/econ agenda) - to prevent the fruitcakes throwing the nukes around (curiously overlooked in polite conversation)...

(So) Wether by accident or a paradoxically capital criminal virtue, Blair has bought time for humanity. Meaning that when the collapse of the USA imperial centre in mideast & corresponding cessation of oil (or even Islamic fascist nuke strike in the west) leads to the (collapse of the entire military plutocratic geo pol/econ centre in Britain/ globally; the) politics of the last bullet/ race war/ primal panic gaining critical momentum in Britain/ globally, humanity does at least have a choice, between the doomsday option & the Omega option....

…the new model Revolutionary (military geo political economic) framework geared to defeating USA Caesarism, classical fascism, Islamic (& Hindu) 3rd world fascism, (indeed every geo political economic threat, including the spectre of global oblivion via nuke war in South Asia/ smallpox)

.....& based on the Core Paradox:

....that the (USA led) military plutocratic elite depend on the Revolution to seize power (from the war/ finance nexus/ machine they are the gilded slaves of), to save their (everyone’s) children; & that the Revolution (to avoid global annihilation) is dependant on this factor & must tailor its entire military pol/econ framework accordingly....

....that must (when & only when the geo pol/econ center of gravity collapses) be launched via a presidential model with a break off from the (then) already collapsed state/ army…

…with its ready made infrastructure (essential for rapid development, as no cadre based movement could possibly grow at a rate capable of overtaking the collapse into anarchy) geared to (putting backbone in) the universities as organisational mechanisms for the mobilisation of the rest of (British/ global) civil society (consolidating Revolution from below) to counter unfolding inexorable slide into chaos. Mobilising for the framework outlined in `Communique Number 1' in `Lucifer2.zip'....

...to `break formation' (eg the theory generally writes itself) & abandon my deconstructionist - reconstructionist technique of eliminating the impossible to find the answers/ patterns...

...(which cannot be done vis the Jesus legend) for a reckless foray into the Jesus legend???

An element of hubristic triumphalism at (my) having finally triangulated the (USA led) military plutocratic regime/ system (the 10,000 year old war/ finance nexus) - after 6 years continuously tracking the enemy, from the South East Asian crisis... (9 years continuously developing the theory), was a factor.

The (triumphalist) desire to use its' own pet legend against it combined with (apocalyptic) fear of what would happen if I did not...

I can honestly say I've never imbibed a blend like this merest trace of such before. I'm rather disappointed in myself, I hoped I could hold my historical liquor better than that...

...eg in context of an increasingly personalised & Jerusalem centred framework (refer back to Communique Number 1 if/ as required) - which logic further antagonises the terminally white hot apocalyptic legends & requires a final showdown with same...

...hence `Lucifer2' marque, to aggressively confront the psycho historical legend of `The fall'

The most noteworthy primordial manifestation (of this subordination of consciousness to matter) being the legend of the `The Fall’… that (as) even, especially the light bearer (`Lucifer’) was cast out for rebelling against God (vis encouraging man to seek independant knowledge of good & evil), that demonstrably humanity cannot save itself by its own autonomous revolutionary initiative, but must instead wait for external divine intervention… this legend is the geo psycho political caldera of the entire Judaeo – Christian – Islamic world. & (as noted throughout S.O.F.; but especially Vol III) it is in this geo psycho political setting that the fate of all humanity will be decided more than anywhere else in the context of the unfolding global pol/econ implosion of the war/ finance nexus.

..... that in order to physically as well as intellectually preserve/ restore/ extend light in both forms (electrical & intellectual), humanity must exploit the chaos/ fear engendered by the final collapse of military plutocratic system to push a rev geo pol/econ framework (which we outlined in `Communique Number 1' in `Lucifer2.zip'- refer back to as required, or wait until we include text of said communique shortly) enabling it to gain hegemony over its own creation (consciousness gaining hegemony over matter...) vis culture of common threats/ objectives confronting all humanity (especially in immediate term, to develop sustainable energy sources - aided by civil society control of finance/ its own creation - humanity no longer subordinate to the war/ finance nexus)....

The very beginings of this new pol/econ culture are to be found in the hope that comes from the beginnings of a viable strategy/ methodolgy to deal with said apocalyptic threats - under pressure of said threats. Representing the pivotal point in history, the precise point at which human consciousness begins to assert its hegemony over matter/ finance/ its' own creation (hence to name `Lucifer2.zip' - an aggressive refusal to submit to our primordial original fear - expressed in the legend of `The fall', but to exploit the chaos to seize command of our own destiny (we examine the strategic role of the cultural co-option of Christian/ Islamic/ Jewish etc imagery in Chapter 2 of `Intro to Quantum Materialism' - contained in `Lucifer2.zip').

....to break our own programming & seize command of our own destiny (through the methods outlined in `Communique Number 1' in `Lucifer2.zip'- refer back to as required)

- as outlined.

Such is the context.

Furthermore not only the comparison between Rome & USA, but also the actual (aforementiond) fundamentals of the legitimacy factor (vis both empires in the mideast) revealed them as mirror epochs...

As seen there are mirror epochs in history.

Eg the most obvious are the first longwave industrial economic boom (1789-1815) & the last (in present era as at 9/8/04) of such.

Both led by a single preponderant power. In the case of Britain the transition stabilised through repression enabling intensified exploitation in the context of the French Revolution, with technical middle/ skilled working classes increasingly providing new points of pol/econ support. We have examined subsequant cycles of rev reform in response to radical shocks enabling the reconfiguration of the military plutocratic system by co-opting new layers of support to stabilise military plutocratic social differentiation.

In the USA case with no single state strong enough to lead the rev reconfiguration of the military plutocratic system, the only way to temporarily stabilise the regime is through speculative finance/ credit expansion accompanied with a battle for resources & markets - the sclerotic effects of which marginalise the military plutocratic elite in (bankrupt) power....

The longwave depression marking the decline of mercantilism & corresponding rise of industrialisation (eg aided by cheap capital as a result of market saturation vis mercantile system a process itself aided by the failure of British mercantilism to pass on the costs of its falling rate of profit by defeat in the American Revolutionary war, blocking of that option)

And correpsondingly the (contingent on conscious civil society exploiting the apocalyptic threats confronting all humanity to gain control of its own creation) managed depression (stabilised by humanity's war substitute, the culture of the common threats/ objectives confronting all humanity - eg sustainable/ renewable energy - pursued with a wartime will) which must usher in the era of solar power...

The emergence of rev pol Chartism marking the birth of laborism (stimulating the British military plutocracy to absorb/ semi institutionalise swathes of labor to broaden the social base of the regime, to prevent all out insurgency)...

And the defeat of the Black Panthers (eg as USA regime had no political legitimacy for Blacks unlike for whites the strengthening of USA Blacks position by the post war econ boom encouraged revolutionary radicalism & the regime fear of a rev alliance with USA white labor leading to Black panthers smashed under cover of the Vietnam war, thence as an organic process, the switch to global finance centred speculative/ credit expansion outflanking said radical threats) marking the geo pol/econ squeeze/ decline/ fall of laborism.

The consequant death of laborism/ inability of the war/ finance nexus to absorb such in a new cycle process of rev reform (as paradoxically, the inablity of the USA or any other single preponderant power, to reform itself by itself in response to a radical shock/ lead a new geo pol/econ cycle of rev reform) led not only to finance reigning as a law unto itself (without the state any more able to function as an arbiter between capital & labor - refer back to Chapter 5 of Vol III vis capitalist longwave cycles) but the tendancy for the main power (USA) to attempt to regulate/ control/ stablise the geo pol/econ agenda on the basis of the short term interests of its ruling elite (regardless of the consequances) as a new Rome

yet unlike the old Rome, precisely because it values its own blood so highly & regrds 3rd world blood so cheaply, it is unwilling to suffer casualties in battle, to secure its rapacious interests.

So that all that remains for USA to either yield power (& make sacrifices for global reconstruction - to gaurentee the security/ future of everyone's children) or retreat into the suicidal fantasy of our Lord & Saviour riding to glory on a mushroom cloud...

So with increasing personalisation of the theory/ & Jerusalem centred geo strategic gameplan (in `Communique Number 1') I couldn't avoid therefore (& this is the point, that subconsciously I had been able to & desperately wanted to so avoid, up until now) the whole Jesus legend...

Anything with a passing resemblence to `the 2nd coming of Brian' has always spooked me somewhat....

But I sensed I'd finally reached the tipping point, where it had become more intellectually/ morally/ strategically perilous not to face this down than to do so...

I think (at least at the conscious level - what got me to pick up the book) I was looking for clues vis martyrology. The idea of self sacrifice deployed in the right time/ place (& vis the right ideas) as a kind of political nuclear warfare...

...& it was only a short walk (over a high cliff) to think I could `eliminate the impossible' from the Jesus legend - to complete the picture (said cocktail of triumphalism & fear gave me the over confidence to attempt to do so)...

Yet there is much more to it than this. For without doubt the biggest ingrediant (more than triumphalism & fear) was paradoxically enough, excessive caution...

Curiously it only really occured to me that I'd made an error when with gameplan becoming more & more personalised & Jerusalem centred I thought I better study the origins of the Jesus legend more closely. Both for clues as to how to take the nuclear fire out of it & also to learn from the political technology...

Well, what was I (subliminally) so afraid of? That made trawling through fragmentary Jesus legend (in order to contain/ appropriate same to take the nuke fire out of it) seem a safer option???

It was the conclusion that not only must I (or whomsoever else be in political command of the British Army – vis gameplan outlined in `Political Communique Number 1) be executed to consolidate rev law/ constitution (for reasons outlined in Communique Number 1), but that (in order to consolidate the historical liquidation of the apocalypse legends), I had to acknowledge (to eclipse said legends) that from the point the sword kisses my neck to the moment it severs my head, I reign as last king & take to the grave sufficient of all the apocalyptic power of the apoclyptic legends with me...

...eclipsed by over-arching culture of the common threats/ objectives confronting all humanity - to enable effective cultural as well as formal/ legal consolidation of the geo constitutional/ legal framework.

I (or whomsoever else be in political command of the British Army – vis gameplan outlined in `Political Communique Number 1) must be beheaded by a Saudi executioner (the more blood on his hands the better) in East Jerusalem (the capital of Medina Commonwealth), the sword immediately destroyed afterwards for optimal cultural impact. No other ceremony, gimmicks etc, before, during or after. Nothing that detracts from the stark simplicity of the act - which itself is praxis the final completion of theory & practice, the consolidation of the global constitutional & legal framework

It was actually because I was so afraid of this vulgar conclusion (of fleeting kingship), that the error I made (vis the Jesus legend - which I correctly sensed had to be decisively tamed) subliminally seemed more cautious...

...Therefore I did not develop point sufficiently - even though I mentioned in/ explained the need for my execution to consolidate global rev constitutional/ legal framework AND to effect a geo cultural shock to critically consolidate overarching culture of common threats/ objectives confronting all humanity (underpinning said framework) in Lucifer2 mark1....

or see the need to go into what paradoxically seemed like fetishistic detail - which seemed to detract from the historical substance & therefore seemed to amount to a debasing braggadacio - which in turn implied I was not really serious about it. Possibly even...

...I had to make such a mistake I then had to correct in order to denote the terminal stage of theoretical development before finally going operational...

eg theory develops in relation to 5 factors:

1) Knowledge

2) Ignorance

3) Audacity

4) Caution

- all against the backdrop of the primary contextual variable:

5) Objective ripeness/ unripeness of historic conditions.

...& therefore I made said error.

This is the only way said legends can be dealt with according to said technique...

By elimination of the impossible, the only govt/ order possible is that of the rev reconstructionist centre - held together by the common culure of the threats/ objectives confronting all humanity...

Another factor for said error, is that I had actually toyed with this rather gothic concept (of fleeting kingship vis the process of sacrificial death) since about 1998 (eg ever since I recognised as a 100% historical inevitability the need for sacrificial death in some form - to free the idea from the control of its originator) & had hitherto managed to avoid this ghastly idea...

So only the choice between leaving the apocalyptic legends intact to reek their havoc, or embracing this ghastly idea to eclipse them (& to account for said error - which if uncorrected would cause fatal damage) could have so forced my hand...

...So by such an excessively cautious approach (prompted dynamically by triumphalism & fear), I instinctively attempted to `maintain contact with the enemy', the aforenmentioned error at least having the merit of functioning as a cypher for the concept I needed to develop...

Only by capturing the contested strategic geo cultural high ground can we eclipse such legends (as well as make viable our framework); & yet in contesting this ground, it is neccessary to follow through decisively (to use every available lever afforded by such to break/ eclipse humanity's self destruct mechanisms...)...

By doing everything neccessary, to make the sacrifice the focus for apocalypse legends eclipse - to enable said sacrifices to serve as the decisive tipping point after which humanity has decisively mastered itself via the overarching culture of the threats/ objectives confronting all humanity - having achieved cultural hegemony (firstly through Global Commonwelath Control of nukes etc & through wartime sacrifices to develop solar powered desalination etc)...

We (I or whomsoever else be in political command of the British Army – vis gameplan outlined in `Political Communique Number 1) go to our place of execution as a republican & we leave this world (for the 20 or so seconds we remain alive after decapitation) as a republican, but during the process of execution, we lay hold of kingship...

(sovereignty vested in one individual - in this case the momentary autocratic political focus of all humanity - effecting the switch to the aforementioned overarching culture of the common threats/ objectives confronting all humanity which is the precondition for the consolidation of the global constitution & legal framework....)

...in order to enable to liquidation of all such (& all power derived from its like) for all time.

Vis Jesus legend, correspondingly it becomes ever clearer we must place all our chips on the USA bomb worshippers. They will spectacularly eclipse whatever errors we've made as long as we make responding to their apocalyptic dynamic our strategic centre of gravity.

Historically we were disinclined to do this before, as to do so seemed to wait until it was far too late.

Therefore (especially pre September 11th) , we imagined a less dramatic/ less imediately globalised slide into political anarchy....

(eg USA trade deficit feeding into capital flight, global credit crunch, hyperinflation & geo pol/econ collapse destroying the Ulster peace boom, collapsing Blair's centre of gravity, leading to Ulster warlordism fusing with Tory anti EU political warlordism over soverign right to commit genocide within borders of Britain)

....correspondingly...

(especially given pre September 11th, that with BNP parrellel organs strategy, we might have needed to engage in paramilitary containment action - if large scale disturbances occurred in London, before geo pol/econ conditions permitted the launch of continuous operations, or else, in a state of prior dissaray, the geo pol/econ crash would have precipitated a rout)

...I sought to develop my theory to match the transitional demands of the time. Which meant intellectual discipline.

I long (instinctively) knew this meant trashing the JFK `Camelot' legend, as well as a pre-emptive attack on any potential resurgent Dianaism (if it was proved she was assassinated - see chapter 3 Vol IV of S.O.F.) - in such a fashion as to instill the kind of discipline capable of holding a revolutionary cadre together - when the general population is drunk on pseudo revolutionary delusions - emoting/ expressing its hatred of the core elite, but not prepared to consider for a moment the price of instituting a new order of things. Or for that matter the price of failing to institute a new order of things.

This also explains my original impulses (to attempt to control what could not be controlled) which fed later into both the aforementioned foray into the Jesus legend and also that vis the USS Liberty Plot (we will analyse later).

I made the grave error of assuming there was clearly enough surrounding evidence to link this isolated particular event to the established principles (eg Cointelpro, & suchlike) of regime pathology...

...Which fed not the `legend of Camelot', but rather of a regime hack (in cahoots with mafia/ anti castro fascists) that had so outraged same over his refusal to go all the way (to make Cuba a place fit for Sam Giancana), that they were going to target him anyway (the murderous credentials of such spoke for themselves) so that the regime proper had to take over the plot in order the better to tie up the loose ends/ minimise the fallout (& cauterise/ contain said forces); to prevent an army of skeletons marching out of the cupboard.

this logic (rather than the manifestly absurd notion of a coup plot against a visionary progressive) connected neatly with how/ why LBJ was far more liberal/ progressive (vis Great Society program) than JFK...

...Which in turn appeared to link in with the Q of a `USS Liberty Plot'

(Note especially the text in red)

Nuclear Cowboys:

The Sinking of the USS Liberty

& the USA - Israeli plot to murder

the entire Soviet people in cold blood,

& its' lessons for the Revolution

I originally (in Excalibur-op4.zip in earlier version of `Intro to QM') used the Q of the sinking of the USS Liberty by Israel to dismiss with utter contempt Islamic fundamentalist claims that Israel was involved in the attack on the world trade centre.

I wrote how this attack (on USS Liberty) was entirely consistent with Israel's need to prevent USA prevaricating in support of Israel at time of war (when USS Liberty listening in on it's communications); that Israel would have felt able to take such stark action to force USA's hand because Israel was USA regime's most reliable ally in securing the regions oil (in fostering through destabilisation, nat sec states, that can be more easily played of against each other...); eg Israel is the USA’s junior partner, even if Israel had/ has a certain freedom of initiative, it can ONLY survive by acting consistent with core USA regime’s interests (unless/ until the Revolution is in a position to offer Israel an alternative security framework – eg when the mad USA Christian fundamentalists, who seek to fulfil Book of Revelations 7:4 vis the reduction of Jewish population from 30 million to 144,000, trigger sufficient global chaos that humanity will pay any price in blood & treasure for revolutionary order/ security through global reconstruction).

I saw no need for any examination of this Q. it looked completely straightforward.

The idea that USA would have actually encouraged Israel to sink USS Liberty, in order then to provide USA with a pretext to nuke Egypt (obviously to Israel's benefit but then by logical extension have to follow through) & incinerate in cold blood the entire Soviet people in a time of economic boom.......

Unless attack on USS Liberty was a mistake, then could only have been a USA secureaucrat led plot to incinerate Egypt/ USSR (by logical extension, which such an attack would have required as a follow through & which therefore Israel would not dare do without USA core elite leadership or else they could be targeted).

& as USS Liberty Communiques were jammed, & to know what frequency to jam you have to know it was a USA ship, the idea it was NOT deliberate is self evidently bollocks - communique only got out due to heroic ad hoc measures of crew under fire (attempts to sink USS Liberty failed & order for nuke retaliation initiated by 6th Fleet countermanded by General MacNamara & LBJ, with only minutes to go).

Israel's guarantee (that it would not be incinerated if plan went awry) was that while Israel had no reconnaissance aircraft, 4 USA reconnaissance aircraft took part in Israeli operations & were repainted with Israeli markings.

This was Israel's insurance against a (potential) claim of perfidy later on (if things went pearshaped - as they did), as `why would Israel attack an ally helping her operationally? Unless of course it was the much bigger plot both were implicated in (& which USA led), to incinerate Egypt/ (as first step to incinerating immediately afterwards) USSR.

(The massive military aid afterwards, was designed to keep Israel at arms length to avoid such plots in future as Israel able to sort things out by herself).

.......WITHOUT (as in the Cuban missile crisis) catastrophic brinkmanship at the periphery by both main protagonists (though given the Strangelovean thinking of USA secureaucrats, the attempt by USSR to get USA to recognise institutionally defacto, a balance of power, did have much to be said for it); such an idea I would have dismissed out of hand & with utter contempt.

(The conservative character of my apocalyptic thinking is best illustrated in Chapter 6 of Intro to Quantum Materialism, `The Power & the Glory', subsection: `Here's one I Made earlier')

....& without either catastrophic brinkmanship at the periphery or geo pol/econ crash (& apocalyptic meltdown); and because the period when only USA had nukes had passed, I assumed that on balance not sufficient of USA military plutocratic elite would be resolved to follow through on such a plot until welded together either by logic of geo pol/econ crash (or catastrophic brinkmanship at the periphery) or accident....

I was cataleptic with incomprehension. I simply could not comprehend the pathology….

….. And then (before too long) things sort of fell into place.....

I was/ (am) not a big fan of the legend of JFK. LBJ was far more liberal than JFK was (certainly within the borders of the USA). LBJ instituted the Great Society Program....

....I accepted that JFK was done in by the core institutional elite. But not because he was going to withdraw from Vietnam, but because the same fascist/ mafia forces ha had set in motion to murder Castro/ invade Cuba (& also the Southern Confederate elements providing greater reach for such) felt betrayed & were going to have a crack at him anyway.

So the regime had to take over the plot to prevent an army of skeletons marching out of the cupboard. Simply to make the cover up manageable (including cauterising some wilder elements).

My contempt for the ludicrous (`Camelot') JFK legend however obscured (for me) an important point which was that the core institutional elite would have felt both emboldened at having gotten away with murdering it's president and felt dangerously squeezed precisely by the more liberal (internal) policies of LBJ (not to mention the rise of new left/ Black radicalism/ Civil rights campaign).

As the core elite would naturally have felt their only (or at least, best) freedom of action to (re)set the geo pol/econ (& internally USA) agenda lay outside of the USA....

To view the historic context:
Historically, the post war econ boom strengthened the hand of USA Blacks (for whom the regime had no legitimacy unlike whites)/ Black radicalism (threatening a rev alliance with poorer whites)....

....compelling the military destruction of the Black Panther Party/ Black radicalism (in the USA) via COINTELPRO (Covert Intelligence Program) under cover of the Vietnam war.....

....in order to make safe the shift to a speculative/ credit expansionary based system/ econ (preserving the independence of capital from civil society control in context of ever diminishing room for bargaining between capital & labor - which found political expression in the Thatcher/ Reagan axis)

Eg (under cover of the Vietnam war) this political crisis, was actually resolved through the geo economic crisis.....

(rise in oil prices as a result of the long term boom creating shortages/ strengthening the hand of the oil producer states in relation to the USA/ core states....

The core problem is that the war/ finance nexus (military plutocracy) reigns as a law unto itself, making it impossible to establish political economic mechanisms to guide development, to meet long term threats to human survival in a concerted way (eg resource oil shortages/ environmental impact of genetic engineering from biocorps beholden to no-one but their shareholders & even the much bigger projects/ threats posed by climatic change....) to see how to address these & the immediate apocalyptic threats posed by the pol/econ tailspin of the global financiers speculator regime, see `Basic Program of the Revolutionary Salvation Front' (in Chapter 3 of this pamphlet)....

......which impact of led to capital eclipsing the USA core empire....& therefore meant that USA radical forces were outflanked by switch to credit/ speculative expansion.... (which meant that while USA radical forces were trashed, there were enough profiting from this system to keep USA regime stable while the radicals could be outflanked/ crushed under cover of ideological `anticommunism'/ Vietnam war)

........as an organic process

...(eg the petrodollars flooded back into USA fuelling longwave credit/ speculative expansion.... & in turn recycled to Latin America dictators/ which came back as capital flight plunder, facilitating USA led military plutocratic loansharking (ratcheting up of interest rates to astronomical levels) their systemic passing costs of crisis onto 3rd world..... - as Joseph Stigliz ex World Bank Chief now admits was the role of his organisation....

- also of note is that this (interest rate trap) was the original cause of Yugoslavia's disintegration... growing debt led to tensions between the republics, & ultimately the desperate playing of the nationalist card in a desperate attempt by the elites to retain control of the pol/econ agenda.... this is analysed in Vol I Chapter 7 of S.O.F.)......

& Reaganite war boom ....

....(the REAL objective of the Vietnam war was to keep Black & White divided & this the enemy accomplished/ won).

....such an act as the plot to murder the entire Soviet people is perfectly consistent with this context.

...it becomes all the more understandable when you bear in mind the proud cultural heritage of genocide such grew out of. More complete (if less industrialised) than the Nazis carried out, with regards the Native American population (remember, we in Britain spawned this monster, it is a precondition of our historic redemption that we reign it in). The utter lack of atonement. The predatory geo pol/econ expansionism as a logical extension of this geo cultural (especially elite) elite psychology/ ethos (which unlike the British/ French has not been acclimatised to defeat/ geo pol/econ power sharing).

Before (feeding into) this plot & after this plot, existed & exists (increasing in strength, especially post Sept 11th 2001, day by day; yet even before, a mechanical criminal pathology, seeking to crucify the world, to redeem USA led military plutocratic elite economically, for the sins of its own internal speculative/ credit expansionary plunder), a cultish power psychology, that reduces Christianity to the status of a national god. That does not see why power should be shared with any other people/ nation/ social group etc (because unlike the nation states of Europe vying with each other for power, it never had to. This was another reason why the Cuban missile crisis had the near precipitate effect it had, & why it fed into the aforementioned LSS Liberty plot).

....The rising cult of the national god has been consolidated. Ready when the time comes/ the geo pol/econ crash leaves no option for the elite, but to seek refuge in the image of our lord & saviour riding to glory on a mushroom cloud; in order to retain control of the global military pol/econ agenda for as long as it takes to (so) destroy the world...

As this pathology is consolidated (the Book of Revelations is close to the hearts of the majority of Pentagon Personnel. Not less than half of all Americans, pre geo pol/econ crash, believe in nuclear war ushering in the reign of King Jesus), it will take something really innovative to break through this thinking for just long enough, to allow the core paradox to kick in to the mindsets of enough of the dangerous classes/ forces to avert global annihilation....

Israel should take grave note, that its' USA aided terroristic expansion throughout mid east (initially in relation to/ as a strategic adjunt to USA oil interests, but also behind this Christian fundamentalist apocalyptic ideology), creating ever more hostility towards the Jewish diaspora, leading to/ catalysing mass migration/ correspondingly more expansion/ more migration etc; in the context of geo economic collapse, especially as Israeli & USA interests begin to clash here & there, is a death spiral.

A ripening of the harvest for USA Christian fundamentalists, seeking to fulfil Book of Revelations 7:4, to punish the Jews for their failure to convert & acknowledge King Jesus (who miserable ahistorical apologists for the Roman empire accuse of slaying by a Roman means of execution), by reducing the global Jewish population from 30 million to 144,000 through nuke war, to usher in the reign of `our Lord & Saviour'.

We must draw out into the open, these monstrous absurdities that take refuge in prayer/ incantation/ refuse to be submitted to anything as base as reason/ logic; & force them into open combat AT ALL COSTS, to break this collective death trance.

The (British led) `Van Helsing’ Plan
The geo cultural pivot linking into the core paradox, on which we must rely is atonement, (via) redemption through sacrifice. Speaking to enemy in their own salvationist cultural language. Using Socialist with Christian emblemology to encircle USA.

Everything however is contingent on the British leading the process (especially via nuke disarmament/ disolving its' own nat sec state). Not saying to others (eg South Asians etc) `You move first'. We move first, then others can strengthen/ consolidate/ execute the new global balance of power.

So that vis Mideast (for example) a socialist red Star of David against a white Christian cross, against a green Islamic background (linking to British/ Euro rev) paves the way for Palestinians, Iraqis' (etc) representatives moving freely about the Pentagon, monitoring at will every going on & all the old secrets/ making sure against a return to the old ways. So that the Arab masses etc must (so) use the cross, as a key to open up the American psyche/ nat sec state/ break the power of the entire USA imperium (to re-iterate the case this can only work with British/ Euro rev leadership. To adopt such imagery without this would amount to cultural prostration to USA imperium, & increase its' apocalyptic arrogance).

& it is this logic vis 3rd world, that such would be willing to adopt such imagery when & only when via British/ Euro rev leadership with a viable plan/ framework/ opportunity to overthrow USA led war/ finance nexus we must rely on.

(vis others, FSSR, a white St Andrews Saltyre with a red star in each corner & a red star/ phoenix rising out of yellow flames. South Asia, a silver Southern Cross constellation against a Black background - Euro emblem included on opening image/ page of Excalibur-op4.

This is designed to throw enough grit into the USA apocalyptic cultural mechanism/ programming, to slow the process of annihilation down for just long enough, that the mad bastards will actually start to think sufficiently about their children, BEFORE they press the button on the whole of humanity

- as well as to get across to 3rd world revanchists that we cannot militarily defeat USA, and should establish EVERYWHERE, a military pol/econ framework based on the core paradox:

....that the USA led military plutocratic elite depend on the Revolution to seize power [from the war/ finance nexus/ machine they are the gilded slaves of], to save their [everyone's] children: & that the Revolution [to avoid global annihilation] is dependant on this factor & must tailor its entire military pol/econ framework accordingly....).

For as the alternative is oblivion & the opportunity common ownership of info (etc) the Revolution can force the trading of (in both first/ 3rd world by mobilising civil society) of the ancient hatreds (which in the main derive their strength/ resilience as, albeit suicidal, cyphers for a desire to remove the USA imperium from power) for a global rev framework of mutually assured security.... so that those seeking to hold out, be denied the support of a geo cultural/ psychological infrastructural support base.

The idea is to simultaneously cut the lines of USA power & develop at every level of global society an anti annihilatory logic that can both buy enough time for the core paradox to kick in (slowing down apocalyptic impulses via such a cultural connexion) and in itself illustrate the logic of the core paradox, that we have no intention of destroying America, hence Christian emblemology/ component; & we have no intention of being destroyed by America hence socialist emblemology/ component.

(&) By countering USA military plutocratic (imperial) expansionism, Europe enables, gives the global ideological initiative to USA visionary expansionism....

...freeing the imagination of our kindred spirits, the mad proffessors from enslavement to the military plutocratic national security state, & bridling them to serve the culture of the common threats/ objectives that confronts all humanity...

...we depend entirely on this New American Ideology, to consolidate our framework/ avoid oblivion/ by capturing the imagination of all humanity (vis culture of common threats/ objectives confronting all humanity)...

In effect this geo strategic gameplan/ new rev theory represents the last & mightiest kick of the old British & Soviet empires...

....we saw a direct precursor in the role of The Apostles (Blunt/ Philby/ Maclean et al & Fuchs etc).

Regarded by fools as traitors, the USA imperium finally reveals them as courageous loyalists of the cause dearest to the soul of Perfidious Albion, preserving the balance of power. Without which there can be no partial or general freedom whatsoever/ anywhere.

Eg without Soviet Union being able to counter balance USA nukes, there is no Q the mad Americans would certainly have incinerated them outright.

Of course such a stalemate could only be turned to victory via paradoxically the cold war defeat/ collapse of the USSR, which however both left a residual balance of power until (& stimulated) the info Revolution.....

especially via the internet, developed originally as a military communications system of decentralised command....

At the same time the Reagan/ Thatcher axis (& their successors) finished of (are finishing of vestigial remnants of) geo politically the orthodox leftist elements in a way analogous to the Viking annihilation of the English petty kings; which paradoxically prepared the way/ enabled the unification of England under one law by Alfred the Great...

.....furnishing the Revolution with the means to fight & win the global civil war; when (as outlined in `Intro to QM') the military plutocratic (geo pol/econ) centre collapses. The decisive weapon being nuke disarmament as an aggressive political weapon to marginalise the USA elite in power/ prepare the way for their armed overthrow.

The Apostles bought time for humanity, so that when the whole world was on its knees before USA Caesarism, it would finally be prepared to accept British leadership & the British prepared to give it...

... by initiating (dissolving itself into) a European Commonwealth of the regions of Europe, in turn defined for the Global Commonwealth Confederation, in turn defined for the Green Revolution (as outlined in Intro to Quantum Materialism).

Indeed it can be said that the British possess a kind of `stupid wisdom' with regards Europe, that until everyone (& this includes the British - perhaps above all) is prepared to assert what (for humanity's survival) Europe must mean & what WARTIME econ sacrifices must be made to forge its G.C.C. objectives, waving your Union Jack underpants in pissed defiance makes about as much sense as any other policy.

We also saw it as part of a behavioural pattern of assassination; Malcolm X, Martin Luther King, Cointelpro (targeting the Black Panther Party for annihilation). Not that Kennedy was getting politically dangerous, merely that the regime habitually removed figures, who, for any reason (eg in JFKs case that the army of skeletons would march out of the cupboard & discredit the state per se, if JFKs' anti castro fascist friends made a botched job of things) presented a critical threat to the security of the regime...

...& this linked albeit at a remove to Cointelpro & the drug dealing military fascist regimes of Latin America (two thirds of whose senior officers are graduates of `The School of the Americas' in Fort Benning, Georgia, USA).

Now while this may be the case, JFK had as much right to be felled by a falling meteorite as anyone else - so that on reflection, I must reign back, as I cannot consider myself qualified to trash the `lone nut' theory - though others might well be. As we are dealing with a particular isolated event - rather than an established pattern of regime behavourial pathology - such as Cointelpro/ GLADIO? Operation Condor & so on & so forth; but above all (in the terminal epoch of the military plutocratic system) the bombworshippers.

Q Does this not mean I am politically dead in the water?

Well, partially. At least until the USA bombworshippers come out under their own banner to vastly eclipse the scale of my errors with a vindication of what I have got right.

Pulling back from our position vis JFK assassination is obviously damaging. But in itself not critically so.

What is much more damaging is (following on from this) the consequant neccessity of pulling back from our position vis the USS LIberty Plot.

Vis the Kennedy assassination, we can define what is possible (& the reasons for such). There are however random variables that need to be defined...

...A `lone nut' couldn't target the USS Liberty. Even if this is possible vis Kennedy assassination & that the changing of the route was merely a random variable (which could indeed be the case) by which I had set to much store, it is much harder to see how such can be applied in the case of the USS Liberty...

& yet, because we retreat from our earlier position vis the JFK Q, we also have to retreat from the USS Liberty Q, as this only makes sense in terms of connected historical sequance (rather than an isolated plot) against the backdrop of a regime plot to assassinate JFK (to tie up the loose ends - as outlined) - eg as an attempt to reset dramatically the military geo pol/econ agenda as a result of said core elite feeling squeezed by LBJ's much more progressive liberalism as weall as the rise of radical forces in the USA...

Otherwise it belongs to the realm of isolated individual operations/ events (even though of exceptional gravity) we do not immerse ourselves in as a matter of routine...

Eg we only dealt with USS Liberty Q in `Lucifer2' (mark1 version), because it appeared as a massive historical anomoly we had to account for & which also connected to our then position on the JFK Q - vis our erroneously thinking we could fit such into established patterns of USA regime pathology).

2 A Voyage Across The Universe

Of One's Own Ignorance

Q How/ what do the bombworshippers actually prove (vis our theory) at the theoretical (as opposed to just the empirical) level (that proves we have not just got lucky in our projections)???....

...That the necessary attempts to develop theory at each single stage (neccessary for its ultimate viable deployment) inevitably were plagued by such errors as an attempt to secure intellectual control/ order/ order in an unripe historical context???

remember that the theory develops in relation to 5 factors:

1) Knowledge

2) Ignorance

3) Audacity

4) Caution

- all against the backdrop of the primary contextual variable:

5) Objective ripeness/ unripeness of historic conditions.

The pre September 11th volumes 2001 works (volumes 1, 2 & 4 of `Substance Over Form', unamended since then - due to impossibility of a single individual keeping up with needs of their development/ neccessity of prioritising concentrating on the gameplan), serve to corroborate the following subsection, which gives a rough outline of the evolution of the rev theory:

The Intellectual Arms Race

&/ or, The Voyage Across The Universe

Of One's Own Ignorance

&/ or, The Build Up To The Next Big Bang

(at the level of human consciousness)

1987 The first Q (on joining Militant Tendancy - which post miner's strike was already in decline), that marked my theoretical development, was `why have we (the Revolution) always failed to win power?'

From this developed an undestanding of capitalist longwave cycles of (of reformist reconfiguration of the war/ finance nexus in response to radical shocks) which in turn stimulatd a souped up marxist approach (as outlined in Chapter 10 of Vol I of `Substance Over Form' The Evolution of an Idea').

Based on the idea that (as before regime could reform itself in response to radical shock) necessary to establish extreme & early mass radicalisation (preferably immediatecapture of the agenda by the revolutionary element of the movement); with (post miners strike only a) student based movement able to initiate such a generalised front.

1991 The other great early motor of thought was the Q of legitimacy. Eg WHY had the revolutionary movement (in the west) failed to make an issue of various colonial slaughters/ WWI to delegitimise the war/ finance nexus?

It was clear that for as long as revolutionary (in this case marxist) politics were based on conventional laborism, they were paradoxically based on room for dialogue between capital & labor. They could therefore stimulate reform of the system, but excepting were a landlordist (or tsarist) pol/econ caused laborism to fuse with an unfolding peasant war (meaning the regime had no stable points of support in the army/ countryside), they could not move in for the kill. This was why also Marxism/ laborism was always based on a call for/ promise of ever higher wages (like in an Arab bazaar), however dire the econ situation, & could not advance programatically a framework of wartime sacrifices for reconstruction - which meant correspondingly that no-one had any confidence in (the most basic economic literacy of) said revolutionary movement.

It was clear immediately after the first gulf war in 1991, that USA expansionism (& its own increasingly chronic indebtedness as a result of military Keynesianism, credit expansion/ hegemony of specultive finance), meant that no single state was strong enough to reform itself in response to a radical shock (as before) & that therefore as no single state was able to lead the rev reformist reconfiguration of the military plutocratic system; the war/ financ nexus had exhausted its' historic potential to refomr itself in response to radical shocks.

This led (in 1991) me ...

long fascisnated with political (eg IRA) hunger strikes (wondering how such a weapon could be adapted to mainland rev purposes) & sympathetic to the idea of machine gunning fascists...

...to the beginnings of Quantum Materialist revolutionary dialectics. The idea of military attacks on classical fascists combined with a radical/ rev program, linked together by antifascist PoW hunger strikes to delegitimise the regime; forcing civil war on ground of the revolutions' choosing. Not surprisingly, as classical fascists were then an endangered species, I was/ remained for a time divided in myself between (a modified) conventional marxist laborism & this reserve (`nuclear') option.

1993 However when the opportunity presented itself, as in the Welling demo (advertised at least 2 months in advance - at the time of Russian parliament's rebellion against Yeltsin...) of October 16th 1993 (to `March on the Nazi HQ' & `Smash the Nazis'), I sought to do so. However taking place after October 4th massacre of the Russian parliamentary revolutionaries (who stupidly went on the offensive as soon as the police cordon was lifted, rather than wait/ gather forces before launching an offensive), resisting yeltsin's fascist compradorist coup, the organisers of said demo, agreed (3 days before said demo/ street battle) with the police NOT to storm the BNP HQ - by agreeing to a route change away from BNP HQ.

I assumed the psycho dynamics of marchers' expectations (for a legitimate street battle against a legitimate classical fascist target - BNP HQ, advertised 2 months in advance) would still be irreversible by mere organisational fiat, so I went ahead with my plan to take/ use petrol bombs in said battle (get arrested, go on hunger strike & stand a la Bobby Sands for Lambeth College vice presidency & use said position to launch rev campaign/ give CPR to the Russian Revolution, etc). Weaponry confiscated by Militant stewards - on pain of being handed over by said comrades to the police (not the launch I had in mind).

1994 Zhirinovsky plot (Zhirinovsky won 23% of vote in Russian elections). I sought out info on wether he would make a stopover flight to Britain (enroute to USA). This was the last time I viewed the new rev theory simply in terms of how the (prospective) dead fascist could provide a springboard for its launch.

All subsequant considerations of wether or not at some point it would be neccessary to coldly target (eg in conditions NOT obviously enabling launch on continuous operations) a given classical fascist (before geo pol.econ conditions clearly permitted launch of continuous operations) were essentially considered as a strategy of containment. Eg this theory is clearly extremely unstable. I envisaged (pre September 11th 2001) that any attempt to get said theory into circulation would lead to immediate disintegration of any proto movement; neccesitating my targeting of a given fascist & NOT going on hunger strike to launch continuous operations UNTIL geo pol/econ conditions permitted to deliberately put the lid on any insurgent activity - keeping emphasis on spread of theory in preperation for when geo pol/econ conditions ripen.

This problem of how on earth you spread said theory before geo pol/econ conditions enable launch of continuous operation,s was to plague me until `Lucifer2’ mark 1.

The partial rise of the BNP pre September 11th, & how I intended to respond to the threat if they got to London, is dealt with in Chapter 6 of `Intro to Quantum Materialism' in the subsection `here's one I made earlier')

The burning of, of any institutional Russian (fascist) revanchist dynamic by the first Chechen war (designed to degrade the army, so that it not only was incapable of predatory ambition, but incapable of functioning as a progressive power base against the new class of fascist compradors that had won power), even if I did not immediately/ consciously draw the right conclusions (that Russia's disintegration was a greater threat than any nuclear Hitlerian threat), further (at a gut/ instinctive level) pushed me down the direction of long term systematic theoretical development.

1995-98 It was only thence that I broke completely from Marxism at the psychological level, though I'd long broken from it in terms of operational conception. Hence I saw the (actually quite old - from sometime 91-93) idea of revolutionary antifascism leading laborism in its wake, rather than antifascism being merely a defensive formation, as being an entirely new innovation. which moreover provided tools for re-interpreting revolutionary & political economic history.

From 1995-98, the theory developed with increasing/ exponential sophistication, yet I was still not clear as to when & under exactly what conditions I would be able to deploy.

1998-99-01 Followed logic of `South East Asian Crisis' from about March 1998. From at least as early as June 1998 (before crisis broke out), projected correctly that the result would be restabilisation based on intensified USA led speculative credit expansionist boom - to temporarily stabilise (at a global level) war/ finance nexus...

From this later emerged a projection of linear (& non linear) rev scenarios centred mainly around the most conservative apocalyptic scenarios.

Eg USA trade deficit/ econ collapse triggering collapse of Ulster peace boom, spilling over onto the mainland & fusing with Tory anti EU political warlordism over the right to commit genocide within our sovereign borders.

More exotic scenarios (such as revanchist assymetric warfare), while not written of as impossible that such would strike out of the blue, I regarded as relatively unlikely until geo pol/ecom chaos intensified post USA crash. Besides which, I had enough trouble trying to convince anyone to take the USA trade deficit led scenarios seriously, without trying to actually lead on the Islamic fascist/ smallpox issue.

Sept 11th 2001 - Feb 2004 Eclipse of conservative apocalyptic scenaios by an immediately globalised form.

New (appropriate) patterns of political warfare (developed from the more exotic of previously envisaged scenarios - in combination with BNP sub scenario had developed immediately prior to Sept 11th - in response to their parrallel organs strategy/ breakthrough from April/ May 2001) envisaged, in new model I attempted to circulate in September 2002.

But, as I refused to commit to the idea USA would definitely go to war in Iraq (as opposed to bomb the crap out of them, threaten invasion & use proxy forces), it was not until later 2003/ Feb 2004 that I concieved of/ developed a Jerusalem centred model/ gameplan - vis `Lucifer2.zip' mark 1.

Sept 2004 It is only now (having developed the appropriate political technolgy to match such threats) that I can bring myself to accept that only when USA bombworshippers march under their own banner (as a result of the fact that USA militarists, uniquely among such in history (to the extent this is the case) don't actually want (themselves) to do any fighting, therefore the only remaining logic is to press the button & hope our Lord & Saviour will come riding to glory on a mushroom cloud) - precipitating America's fear of America, humanity will be sufficiently terrified to adopt & develop further, my counter measures.

Looking back, there is no way in 1987 or even relatively recently, I could have reconciled myself to such a notion, without becoming (defacto) one of those that advocate everything must crash (for all practical purposes, irretrievably) into the abyss for some miraculous resurrection/ transubstantiation to occur - without bothering to develop any corresponding counter measures.

USA bombworshippers aside, I reckoned circa 1987 (& even before) Revolution to absolute imperative, because even in event of a new period of longwave rev reform/ reconfiguration of the capitalist system, humanity would not survive the resultant proliferation of inherently apocalyptic technologies, on basis of military plutocratic elite hegemony – eg without civil society hegemony/ control over how such technologies are developed/ deployed & to what purpose.

Without trying all this time to steal a march on history, I could never have kept pace with it. Therefore such, a voyage across the universe of one's own ignorance, was neccessary, to develop the new political technology, to get to each staging post just in time, to remain in the game, to struggle to get to the next objective

Eg if I had not developed subscenario to deal with the BNP Q (a couple of months) before September 11th (to combine with scenarios related to assymetric warfare) I could not have developed subsequant paradigms; history would have run too far ahead of me to be able to catch up, to produce the outline gameplan which (when conditions ripen - via America's fear of America) the rest of humanity can/ must develop further in every way required, in action, in theory, wherever they are, however they can.

(etc, until my death - hopefully effetively deployed - consolidates new rev culture & correspondingly global constitutional/ legal framework)

Each new objective more starkly forbidding than that which preceeded it...

Likewise for all humanity in the future (Keeping its' correspondingly exponentially increased knowledge/ imagination continuously occuppied in a kind of intellectual `Big Bang').

The Grand Canyon of Anomolies

In terms of economics, what the hell were we doing between 1987 (when we first understood longwave pol/econ cycles) & 1998 (when we correctly projected the course of the so called SE Asian crisis)?

While in 1987 we had some understanding of longwave pol/econ cycles, we saw this entirely in terms of (Marxist) laborist patterns of struggle.

If labor is dead per se, the system doesn't work anymore & doesn't have a future. A new longwave cycle of rev reform (as opposed to a last orgy of speculative finance/ credit expansionary terminal binge deficit financing - the senile miss Haversham of global finance capital, parodying the dawn of her youth, the British led first longwave industrial capitalist boom between 1789-1815, when labor was politically marginalised as a precondition for the first phase of industrial expansion) is impossible.

& this (manifest inability of the regime to reform itself) only occurred to me after the first gulf war '91, whence correspondingly we developed first concepts of the new political warfare.

But conditions were clearly unripe for this deployment, so while we were champing at the bit, aside from a couple of isolated hoped for opportunities - there was nothing doing...

...furthermore, our own doubts/ psychological attachment to the old forms/ organs held us back intellectually, until conditions began to ripen (& labor's death clarified the more clearly beyond all doubt - specifically the rise of Zhirinovsky - whose darkstar was only eclipsed by the first chechen war - to destroy the army - preventing not only Russian Hitlerism, but the army serving as a progressive bulwark a la Lebed against fascist compradorism).

Hence 1987-92 spent at college trying to form circles primed for a corresponding eventuality (see Chapter 10 of Vol I of `Substance Over Form' for details)...

`93-`94 related to Welling (target BNP HQ on October 16th 1993 march)/ Zhirinovsky plots (essentially hybrids between a souped up Marxist - laborism & new rev warfare) - effectively attempts to jet fuel laborism (eg target legitimate fascist targets, go on hunger strike for my release & connect this with a wider political program/ campaign & attempt to generate a new revolutionary political movement out of the experiment/ my martyrdom) - accounting for their extreme premature deployment - yet curiously without which I would never have understood their limitations & therefore been prepared for the next stage:

Afterwards, longterm theoretical development - leading ultimately to correct projection of SE Asian crisis & beyond

So it was only between `95-`98 when we correspondingly developed to a more advanced level the new political warfare/ correspondingly re-interpreted pol/econ history in its light, were we even able to begin to ask Qs about global (as opposed to Marxian essentially national laborist) strategic deployment/ impact & correspondingly the specific global pol/econ conditions that would enable such to develop.

The critical factor in all this, is that all is reduceable to the struggle to master time - space.

In this also is to be found the cardinal virtue of the weakness of the state (as outlined in `Communique Number 1') . That by due process of elimination, as the state can no longer serve, in stable form, as the repressive agency of elite power over the rest of humanity, its' only effective power is to buy time, to prevent different peoples slaughtering each other for just long enough, to allow a rev revonstructionist global pol/eon constituional/ legal framework to kick in - held together by the new overarching culture of the common threats/ objectives confronting all humanity.

Though of course the struggle to begin to overcome existential isolationism through a common culture of threats/ objectives confronting all humanity doesn't completely eliminate all such (to enable time - space to be fully mastered) until humanity gets to the stage of development where human consciousness itself fuses together `breaking through the childproof locks' (as outlined in Chapter 3 Vol V of S.O.F.) inherent in the universes' creation, that intelligent life can only learn that which it is ready to begin to deal with the consequances of said knowledge...

We will next confine ourselves to examining the first phase of this next (intellectual) `Big Bang' at the level of human consciousness.

Those that endure the exhilirating terror of such will be better placed to chart the course of the next phase `beyond terror'; though I expect this is based on moving beyond planetary parochialism in every possible way.

Clues may possibly exist in Chapter 4 of Vol II of S.O.F., vis the concept of `God Minimalism' vis the minimum engagement with maximum effect of such a factor.

3 Logic Red In Tooth In Claw

## An Ancient Struggle

`Intro to Quantum Materialism’ (& in greater depth, the first 2 Volumes of S.O.F.) illustrates that:

Human consciousness is a battlefield between:

….the eternal truth

…….all know (humanity has always known).... that (the) pol/econ system based on social stratification ultimately breaks down completely somewhere along the line, threatening wholesale anarchy..... even if you do (they did) not know where....

....this is the primordial basis for all altruism, the instinctive recognition that social stratification is ultimately unviable, & a system based on equality is ultimately imperative to enable order....

Of course, as we have seen, equality as an end in itself leads to destructive consumption of the social surplus product for subsistence (treat capital as income), leads to economic anarchy, is unviable - equality as a means to an end however is imperative; to enable the whole citizenry to educate themselves to the degree neccessary to meet the common threats/ objectives that confront/ threaten human existence

- (&) only such a culture of the common threat to human existence can stabilise the WARTIME sacrifices (from the core states to finance global reconstruction neccessary to enable this) insuring social stability between peoples.

The primordial elemental understanding that class society ultimately cannot be sustained indefinitely (even if/ when they did not know how) is/ was the immortal rational/ self interested basis of ALL altruism, seeking peace of mind... even when previously because class society was able to progress, reform itself in response to radical shocks, humanity was not threatened with all out oblivion & (correspondingly) it was not possible to scare them shitless with the threat of military plutocratic oblivion to get them to endure WARTIME sacrifices for global reconstruction. (leading such to drift by tragic default, into reactionary egalitarianism, the destructive consumption of the surplus product for subsistence - treat capital as income).

And the desire to remain slaves....

….to not take responsibility for the tasks of reconstruction.... to sell one's soul to priest, king or party boss in exchange for peace/ order (so as not to have to think/ confront responsibility for this Q).

(As we have seen & demonstrate in greater detail in S.O.F.) For as long as the machine of war/ finance/ class society was able to develop/ reform itself in response to radical shock, it was possible for these tendancies to co-exist in (mutually interdependant) shifting, unstable, equillibrium.

BUT

The rise of global finance beyond the control of any state (undermining the capacity of the state to act as arbiter between capital & labor/ instigate rev reform/ reconfiguration of the geo pol/econ in response to a radical shock) changes all this.

There is no longer co-existence... there is no more opportunity to maintain a pretence about fighting for freedom whilst conforming to enemy operational control of the military political agenda. What was once said only by those that called themselves revolutionaries, that democracy is a sham, that the political frontmen are all rentboys for the financiers, is now accepted by the vast majority even of non radical citizenry....

...there is nowhere to run, no alternative to total capitulation before the terrifying apocalyptic threats triggered by the global econ implosion/ collapse into warlordist anarchy.... except the most extreme bid for freedom, to embrace redemption through sacrifice, WARTIME sacrifices in both blood & treasure, to overthrow the enemy.... & finance global reconstruction....

....for either ALL shall be free, or none shall be free.....

Logic Red in Tooth & Claw

(We have seen that)
The new state like the old is based on terror. But not of other peoples/ ethnicities, but of the common threats/ objectives confronting human survival.

In a world in which it is impossible to sustain stability on the basis of old military plutocratic system of social/ econ heirarchies (based on nat sec state/ finance info control), the only way to insure stability is through a new cultural architecture of terror; continuously emerging threats being balanced against others. Eg competing schools of terror....

(fear of natural/ manmade eco destruction, fear of asteroids, fear of super volcanoes, fear of consequances of over rapid/ under rapid deployment of GM technologies, fear of skewing policy/ resources too much towards one threat & not enough towards another; & countless other threats),

....maintaining the stable (socio pol/econ) fragmentation of power. The contra currents aggressively co-existing with the transient orthodoxy/ core priority.

A post ideology, ideology more intense/ absolutist than anything dreamt up by the Nazis/ Stalin, galvinising every citizen, every child, martialing their individual ambitions/ egos towards a relentless series of common purposes (vis said common threats/ objectives....)

A state of permanent war against every threat to human existence....

Where education is re-engineered accordingly, teachers become part soldier (in these struggles), part recruiting sergeant, part arms dealer; selling the importance of their work to students anxious to continually re-arm themselves against said variety of threats, for humanity, the power & the glory

(not vis birdshit splattered statues of themself, but vis the knowledge that one's work is the very bedrock of human survival/ development)

....All providing a familiar, reassuring continuity with the old order.

The precondition of the new order (of human survival itself) is that consciousness must determine being, gain hegemony over matter (civil society controlling finance, instead of finance controlling civil society). Free will (as seen in Chapter 5 of `Intro to Quantum Materialism') is NOW the decisive primary factor, as automatic (evolution)/ progress on basis of military plutocratic system is no longer viable (as military plutocracy no longer capable of reforming itself in response to radical shocks - as seen throughout `Iintro to QM' etc).

But remember, EVERYTHING is riven with paradox, logic is red in tooth & claw. Eg formerly the struggle for (limited) freedom (within the hegemony of the war/ finance nexus) was inseperable from/ dependant on colonial murder as of neccessity (hardly surprising as consciousness emerged from/ grew out of dust/ primordial sludge)....

....& we ourselves depend/ build upon this legacy & the human drives of ego/ ambition that propelled it....

….as well as the core paradox:

…that the enemy depends on the Revolution to seize power (from the war/ finance nexus they are the gilded slaves of) to save their (everyone’s) children & that the Revolution (to avoid global annihilation) is dependant on this factor & must tailor its entire military pol/econ framework accordingly….

So our logic, ALL logic is by definition impure....

....there can vis logic, be a general tendancy/ process of refinement/ purification, but NOT purity per se.

WHY not?

Because humanity, its individualistic egos/ primal drives can only be stabilised by a permanent war, wave after wave of common threats/ objectives confronting it. And also by the very fact that internal conflict (competing ambitions) find their outlet through conflicting priorities within the same cultural framework (of common threats/ objectives confronting all humanity) - the cultural checks/ balances permanently inherent within the new order keeping power securely fragmented.

(So) By definition, one that uncovers/ begins a/ the new dialectic, cannot colonise the full scope of their (eg my) new theory.

Eg I am compelled by historic time limitations , to stick to providing a barebones commanding theoretical/ strategic overview, in such fashion as enables/ provides the foundation for others to flesh out/ develop further.... paradoxes & all....

Naturally I resent not being able to colonise all (the scope of) my (theoretical) empire, but if I could, this would take me deep into other territory (which likewise I'd want to make my own ad infinitum); until I became just the sort of miserable all controlling celestial Saddam Hussein that USA Christian fundamentalists (& other slobs) fawn at the concept of.

(Cosmic) fragmentation of power, maintains the (philosophical) Republic/ Commonwealth.

Linked in with this, is the inevitably venal (self interested) character of this impurity, flowing from the fact that truth is BOTH objective & subjective at one & the same time.

What is the solution to resolve this particular paradox?

(Simply) stabilisation through expansion & development, impelled/ linked to (said) culture of common threats/ objectives confronting all humanity (as outlined).....

....& the overthrow of military plutocratic geo pol/econ system based on accumalation of finance for its own sake by:

....a Revolutionary Democratic system based on (civil society hegemony over finance held together by common threats/ objectives confronting all humanity) accumalation of knowledge for its own sake as the source of raw power.

Where individualistic ambition/ ego, primal lust for power is channelled (to serve said culture of common threats/ objectives confronting all humanity).

Only thence, when humanity is no longer the slave of the war/ finance nexus, will knowledge itself cease to be as well. But still, logic produced from/ dependant on our (channelled) primal drives will ever remain, red in tooth & claw.