Amanda McDonald Crowley, a curator from Australia, was with the
gallerists, critics and curators in Mumbai, for a one-day workshop on the
problems & prospects of new media art exhibitions. The discussion went on
to ' audience development'... suddenly, all of us became participants
and started airing our experiences, often frustrations, about the
absence of an educated 'art public'. The Kala Ghoda Art Festival (KGAF) was
to start the same evening, And when it did, Kala Ghoda 'art district'
was brimming with visitors, artists and art-lovers. Did our
self-introspective comments prove eccentric? Our frustrations, melodramatic?
The visual art component in the Kala Ghoda Art Festival has, over the
years, turned into a tactical tool for the art exhibitors -- galleries
and groups of artists alike - for widening the audience base. To
popularize the arts so as to infuse life in the KalaGhoda area while
preserving its heritage, is the aim behind the KGAF, says Sharda Dwiwedi; the
historian who has been with the Kala Ghoda Association since its
inception. The pedestrians who sometimes take a peep in the Jehangir Art
Gallery do not necessarily 'encounter' art on this scale: The KGAF 2003 had
about 25 exhibitors. But is this scale, magnitude, as also the
'presence' of people, enough to enrich a pedestrian's eye-view of Art ?
Ask Sangeeta Jindal, the coordinator of the KGAF and she will admit a
few things ('yes, this year the films and music component was heavier
than the visual arts, but that's the reflection of the organic nature of
the KGAF as a process' -she says). Jindal asserts that the art
component of the KGAF has revolved, more or less, around one major show - like
'Picasso' last year and 'Ravi Varma' this year. It's not about the
adherence to the theme, but rather a celebration the spirit of these shows,
she explains.
This year, Raja RaviVarma's works in the Fatehsigh Gaikwad Collection,
Baroda, was the major show. Even the NGMA- National gallery of Modern
Art, Mumbai, abutted the priceless Baroda collection with a melee of
RaviVarma's lithographs. The spirit of the Ravi Varma as the
artist-entrepreneur who popularized his art was not-so visible in the KGAF-specific art shows. Archana Hande, had curated a show of 8 contemporary
printmakers at Chemould Art Gallery, and it served as a good juxtaposition to
the RaviVarma print vagaries. The show, titled 'artist/proof', was
indeed a contemplation on the possibilities of 'print'. The curator looked
for artists not necessarily trained as printmakers: those who'd rather
not follow the strict limitations of a traditional printmaker. The use
of 'Found' prints by Abhimanue V. G., digital transfers by Sharmila
Samant and Rajmohhamad, sculptural forms within the gamut of 'print' by
A. Balasubramanian and Anupam Chakraborty, were highlights of the show.
The Jehangir Art Gallery had its scheduled shows, one of them being a
retrospective of S. G. Vasudev's copper-plate etchings. The
Bangalore-based artist was present for all 7 days and happily answered queries
about his technique. In what is called the 'auditorium hall' of the
Jehangir, one saw the trained and Glasgow-returned printmaker Rajan Phulari
turned to painting, in a dual show with Sajal Sarkar. Artists Centre, the
oldest visual-art venue in Kala Ghoda, showcased works from the last
60-odd years, and traced 'modern' art through the collector's eyes.
' A Galaxy of Musicians', one of the famous paintings by Raja Ravi
Varma, was turned into the theatre on which, the story of a riot-victim
unfolded. This video-installation by Nalini Malani (and her team) was
shown at two venues: at the Chemould art shop during the day, and then on
one of the pavement spaces after dark. The 'still' painting by the
Raja, who romanticized the idea(l) of National Integrity by showing the
diverse musicians (as if) playing to the same tune, was made to encounter
the harsh realities of the torn dream. Malani employed narrative as
well as visual streams, while the painting faded in and out, to signify
the presence of a sunken ground.
Saffronart.com came out of their 'web' and showed select works from
their site. The show, ' A transition of icons' in its brief curatorial
note made a reference to Raja Ravi Varma's use of icons, royal portraiture
and printmaking as a mass media art genre. Blame it on the inclusion of
too many painters, or on the choice of individual works, or the want
of explanatory notes to emphasize the curator's viewpoint, but the show
did not convey the message from the century after RaviVarma-IC icons.
At best, it served as a ' lonely planet thorn tree' to the topic : Raja
Ravi Varma and the iconographic stream. The Raja was also remembered by
the 'Philips Antiques' - they had showcased the range of
print-antiquities, form hand-coloured Tanjore prints to the Hand-block print and Chitrashala prints to complement the well-kept Raja Ravi Varma
litho-prints. A similar display was seen at the Bayside cafe.
Other shows did not have such references to Ravi Varma. Their concerns
were different. Some cared for the public eye, others shared the
festivity, there were some who sold, and some who just showed. The Bajaj art
Gallery was happy with their street-event : hour-long demonstration by
well-known calligrapher Achyut Palav. Tao Gallery took the opportunity
to help the 'anvil design' merchandise of coffee mugs, trays and
goodies with 'heritage Bombay' icons. From Ahmedabad came the Kanoria Centre
for Art, to show works by artists presently in residency.
With these and other shows, the question remained : what are different
curatorial concerns (if any) behind each of these shows? (Or, will
KGAF turn into another 'Mela', or worse, 'trade-fair' for art? If it
happens, how would the 'class' and 'mass' cultures in the area interact
though art? ) There were no straight answers. It was only through an
inquisitive- intuitive critique of these exhibitors' possible motives
behind participation in the KGAF, that a four-pronged 'curatorial' pattern
evolved :
To showcase the gallery collection/ curatorial skill within the domain of contemporary Indian visual art, is the preoccupation of galleries. The KGAF this year was no exception to that. As 'usual', there were pavement-exhibitions and paintings 'kept' in halls, by the galleries who are not from the Kala Ghoda Area, so to say, the ones off the 'art-district'. These 'mofussil' galleries included two big art-dealers : the 'Fine art resource' and 'Art Musings'. The passion towards variety prevailed, and curatorial intervention was obviously, lacking.
To Craft a public response for art via craft-items. A fine balance of functionality and artistic quality was attained by Medha Prabhakar and co-artists at the Hermitage art gallery stall.They displayed a collection of paper handbags and glass trays, which had obvious marks of a contemporary artist's intervention. The collection, inspired by botanical forms, was coupled with epigrammatic poetry by Anahita Contractor. Then there were two collectives of artists, whose keychains, bead-necklaces and thingies almost resembled the 'real-life' hawkers' curios sold near the Prince of Wales Museum - the difference, of course, induced the viewer to employ his deductive logic to arrive at 'art'. Armaan, a group comprising mainly of art-students, sold craft 'items' as a self-help measure (ask S. G. Vasudev at Jehangir, and he'd recall his days as a young artist at Cholamandal who had to depend on the copper-craft), but Armaan also has a cause- to help the lesser-privileged children. Yet another version of this crafted attention to art was seen at a whopping 3-stall pavement occupied by the gallery Art Quest. They tied up with 'inside outside' this year, and sold 'furniture painted by (upcoming) artists'. Gay colours, easy visuals and functionality were essential to these pieces.
To Articulate the need to look at art, while speaking of the issues faced by the society. Shirish Shetye's 'photojournalistic' sojourn to the city living by rail-tracks was an eye-opener. Armaan, for the cause of children, displayed some poster-poetry alongwith water-colours by Himanshu and the sculpture, 'Hunger' by Prashant. ArtQuest also chose to 'educate the public', but ended up in illustrated messages.
To cherish and nurture the spirit of the locale, by intervening right
into the space. 'public art' would not be the right word for the Rhythm
House window works done by the students of Empire Institute, or even
for the 'flag installation' by Papri Bose-Mehta & Soham. While the Rhythm
House wore a different kind of 'window display' with found objects; the
flag installation lacked interactivity. The spirit of 'Public Art' was
captured by 4 collaborating IFA (India Foundation for the Arts)
fellows, who made huge interactive sculptures in ceramics (Stoneware). Madhavi
Subramanian, Amrita Dhawan, Anjani Khanna and Vineet Kacker have
evolved the designs of these four works at the pavement near NGMA. The work
still stands there, and if the signature campaign initiated by IFA and
the artists to make this work a permanent installation hits the right
response, will stay here! This quartet of ceramists have worked on
their wheels individually, but have drawn the formal and conceptual aspects
of their work from a process of discussion and interaction. The scenes
from the city life are turned into motifs here (Vineet has
monumentalised the nearby Chappal-wallah and Shirt-seller in his cylindrical
sculpture, by using icons of the things they sell ; Madhavi, in her work
with three 'ghada's, has romantisized the circularity and buzz of this
buzy circle in south Mumbai; Amrita has chosen to time-capsule the
various professions that the Mumbaikars take to net a living, and Anjani has
gazed at the bull-tough, high-rise nature of this cosmopolis.
Interactivity starts when the works are touched by a pedestrian, and s/he
revolves them. But even a 'commoner' would realize that the motifs are
thoughtful and not just decorative.
All of them, at KGAF, have had their byte of the 'pedestrian's
eye-view'. But things would not change fast. "Kya hai Bhai?" - "ART hai" has
been the most common 'dialogue' between two pedestrians who peep into
the Jehangir and look at a work that they would rather not comprehend as
'art'. If the Kala Ghoda Art Festival could shake and brake the
notion-barriers, it is not through the 'showcase' approach!
- Abhijeet Tamhane,
Mumbai, 28th Feb., 2003.