MSCList Postings

February 2000

jan 00 ... mar 00
1party of axe 1cool 4lixpater
7decent radio 9digibox 9boot
10s-c tunes 10marriage 10random jottings
11missile cake 12thoughts of the day 12dammit
13valentines 13katz-bashing 15tv and video
15victims 16profit and society 16schultz
18valentines rant 19week by week 19it's not fair
20what did i watch 21fish 22bye, buffy?
23monday tuesday 24mpeg-tastic 25reasons to be cheerful
26so who watched..? 26gold cup 27what's the point?
28footy talk 28happy birthday, Ulrike
  
party of axe
feb 1

Lauren:
So it's been done to me again...Fox has cancelled Party of Five...my favorite TV show.
I fear it's been coming: the show has been going downhill ever since it started, and I gave up halfway through season 4 - when they took the show off air for a couple of months. The moment it jumped the shark was when Griffin took on Claudia's crush - it stopped being realistic and started being soapy.

POF fans want to start a letter writing campaign...but I don't know, I guess it should just end with dignity. Neve Campbell already said that she won't be returning next season if it renewed. I don't want it to turn into 90210. I have mixed feelings.
It had six seasons. As good a run as anyone could have expected. It's already gone into syndication, and will be cropping up everywhere. Hopefully, without being F*Xed up.

  
cool
feb 1

Angela Bigos:
There's a saying "Only horses sweat- ladies glisten". Women are taught that it is totally disgusting to sweat, but I've heard men say that a woman sweating is a turn-on- guys, what do you all say?
I'm in agreement with Eric on this one. It's all a throwback to Victorian-era values. Horses (and manual labourers) sweat, refined men perspire, ladies glow. Tea is cucumber sandwiches with the crusts cut off and is taken at 4pm. Coffee is taken at 11am, but guests must leave by 11:50 in order not to intrude into pre-lunch drinks.

Ladies shall employ maids to do the manual work, such as washing, pressing, cleaning. They shall sit in the garden and crochet, make light conversation at the dinner table before retiring after the meal to allow the gentlemen to discuss politics and business.

It's all *very* 1800s.

  
lixpater
feb 4

The future Mrs Cory Falcon:
My German class is so much work, but it's sooooo fun! I have to write an essay about a time I or someone I knew got a fine. I have the greatest story - it involves my dad getting arrested for refusing to let a police car pass (they were arresting his friends; it was a demonstration), Abe Fortas (then SC Justice) admitting his corruption to my aunt; my dad's boss paying his bail and getting a job offer because of it; and my dad refusing to pay him back. I SO win! But only if I can say it im deutsch...
Let me see if I can retell that in Latin. A language I've not really used in ten years...

In Novum Eboracum Lixpater erat.
Lixpater ad demonstrandum advenit.
Vigilum vexatium agire ultra obtestors volavit.
Sed Lixpater "Minime!" dixit.
Vigilus vexatius Lixpaterum in carceram iacavit, quod vigilus vexatius putridus erat.
Amitam Lixam vigilum vexatium corruptio cognoscavit, et fetorum petavit.
Umbo lixpater in basilicam plurimi denarii exsolvit, quod lixpater a librare.
Lixpater non umbom denarios resolvit, et omnes felicitas quivis spiravit.
Nisi quod vigilus vexatius; in ignis venit.

Judy, just how bad was that?

  
decent radio
feb 7

Brendan:
'Boss-chops' is playing the same six songs every 2 hours. Our playlist has shrunk to a ridicilously small amount of songs. I have to bear Britney and Christina twice an hour and it's not nice! Anyway, yep, I agree that Iain could do a better job himself.
The same every two hours? Bad. Anyway, here's my shot at a playlist.
Six A1 records (Gabrielle, Mint Royale, REM, Macy, Blink 182, Andreas) repeat every three hours.
18 A2 records (including LFO, Santana, Scooch, Lonestar, All Saints, Filter, Thunderbugs, Eurythmics) repeat every six hours.
30 B records (including Bluetones, RHCP, Whitney, Robbie, Eiffel 65, Moby) repeat in 8.5 hours.
15 C records (imports from other countries, and new arrivals) repeat in 10 hours.
50 recurrent records (recent hits, familiar tracks) come round every day and a half.

With no news, little waffle and commercials, we can easily fit 14 records per hour. Radio 1 aims for 15 with news and DJ babble. Anyway, here's two hours listening...

Len - Steal My Sunshine
Atomic Kitten - Right Now
Barenaked Ladies - One Week
Chantal Krevizauk - Before You
Macy Gray - Still
Pet Shop Boys - You Only Tell Me You
   Love Me When You're Drunk
All Saints - Pure Shores
Des'ree - Kissing You
Britney Spears - Born To Make You Happy
Progress - Everybody
Andreas Johnson - Glorious
Brian McKnight - Back At One
Aerosmith - I Don't Want To Miss A Thing
Foo Fighters - Learn To Fly

Faith Hill - This Kiss
Filter - Take a Picture
TLC - Unpretty
Moby - Why Does My Heart Feel So Bad?
Tamperer - Hammer To The Heart
Santana - Maria Maria
Blink 182 - All The Small Things
RHCP - Otherside
RHCP - Scar Tissue
Thunderbugs - It's About Time You Were Mine
k d lang - Miss Chatelaine
Whitney - I Learned From The Best
Mint Royale - Don't Falter
Madonna - Like A Prayer

Don't all offer jobs at once (:

  
decent radio
feb 9

Eric Geyer:
I was just wondering exactly what a digibox is. I'm guessing something television-related, but its not quite clear. Here in the US if you have cable TV you get a descrambler box for a small fee ($25 or so) when you sign up. Something that cost upwards of $375 would be pretty unusual here.
Digibox = device for descrambling digital terrestrial television transmissions.

In addition to the analogue systems that have been in use for the past 75 years, Britain launched digital television through a normal aerial in November 98. The digibox is the computer that finds the signals and turns them into viewable programmes. According to the spec, it uses the power of a Pentium running around 150MHz, and some specially developed software.

On launch, Digital Terrestrial Television (DTTV) was available to around 55% of the population, with the remainder to be filled in by 2006. Leamington's transmitter entered full-time testing in mid-January, and officially enters service next Tuesday. This means that I can retrieve the box from the parents - who have been keeping it since I moved here - and use it for my own ends. (And, yes, that includes MTV:UK. Sara will have to find some other advert to compare me with :)

The box cost a notional GBP 467, but was subsidised down to GBP 200 on condition I subscribe to subscription channels for a year. Anyone wishing to purchase a box outright now must pay the full market rate - around GBP 350 - as the terms of the offer have changed.

It's not really comparable to a cable box, owing to the significant difference in the power of the digibox. Mine also runs teletext and can process email (though the keyboard isn't available yet.)

Further details on this topic at 625 online

  
boot
feb 9

Angela Bigos:
I WAS THROWN OFF A LIST!!!
Is your mailserver really that bad? Or was it some other reason...

Got a message from the list owner informing me that she didn't think the recipe one was relevant and that it would "confuse" the (obvious idiot) listees.
If it ain't relevant, there is an argument against it going out. Or the thread continuing in public.

It was advertised as a non-moderated list for 21 and over where everyone was encouraged to cut loose.
If the adverts on that service were legally binding most of the lists would be radically different. Treat them as aspirations, not the way they are.

I discovered that I'd been DUMPED! I'd threatened to do so on the grounds of censorship but really hoped it was some kind of lets-work-it-out misunderstanding.
From everything you've said, this is clearly a misunderstanding. Nothing more, nothing less.

What I'm really upset about is whether or not this will somehow "blacklist" (what a crummy word) me?
Potentially, on any list said op also runs. But not beyond that.

Comments PLEASE!
Off-the-wall personality meets closed minds with predictable results. Sounds like the plot to a 3am movie on Channel 5, the sort that the Radio Times describes as "hardly suitable for a phone call, never mind a film. *"

One of the other listees says that this woman puts new listees on the "watched" list for a month (even though it doesn't say that in the description). Can she advertise one thing and then follow another policy?
It's dishonest not to be upfront about it. Very dishonest.

I wrote to Onelist but I feel sure they'll ignore it- they must get tons of mail.
Then keep writing till you get answers. They do answer all correspondence, eventually. It may not be an answer you like, but they do answer.

  
s-c tunes
feb 10

angela:
Okay music lovers! What would be the theme song for the lives of MSCL?
Greetings, pick-poppers. Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha bonk.

[Cue "At The Sound of the Swinging Cymbal"]

Angela Chase - "Who Where Why" - Jesus Jones

# Who am I? Where am I? Why do I feel this way?#

Patty Chase - "Can't Take My Eyes Off Of You" - Andy Stewart

Graham Chase - "How Do You Expect To Be Taken Seriously?" - Pet Shop Boys

Danielle Chase - "Big Big Girl" - Emelia

Rickie Vasquez - "I Want to Break Free" - Queen

Rayanne Graff - "Unbearable" - Wonderstuff

Jordan Catalano - "My Drug Buddy" - Lemonheads

Brian Krakow - "Why Does It Always Rain On Me" - Travis

Mr Katimski - "I Do I Do I Do I Do I Do" - ABBA

Sharon Cherski - "Venus" - Shocking Blue

Delia Fisher - "From Out of Nowhere" - Faith No More

  
marriage
feb 10

Cory:
>But was it a monogamous marriage? Or could you both take other
>partners? We ought to get Justice Judge to rule.
But. . . but. . . but. . . oh, I want to marry her. *pouts*

Well, the good news is that our network of spies tracked Justice Judge down to Leicester Square yesterday evening. Her opinion was: given the lack of legal bindingness of the certificate herewithinheld, that the contents of the certificate should not be taken as forthbinding on all participants, thus enabling them to admit alternate parties pursuant to the common and mutual interest.

"What does that mean, in simple terms?" we asked.

"Quite simply, Leo's here. Leo! Leo!" hollered Justice Judge. Make of that what you will.

>Thanks. Now I'm worried.
And rightly so.

Hopefully Brem's book won't be remaindered for two years after publication. Actually, I think Mrs Thatcher's autobiographies were both remaindered after 18 months. Who is the better writer? Who would be the better leader of the country? (These are no-brainers.)

-cory (who must go to the Allmighty quote notebook for inspirtation -- yes, I do still carry that thing around. It needs some duct tape hella bad.) Holy nightlife, Batman, the AQNB Lives!

  
random jottings
feb 10

Research in Toronto shows just 2 people in each thousand ever tune into the French language programmes there. I shake my head in disbelief. Yes, they may be in a foreign language. No, they're not completely incomprehensible - try watching five minutes of news in English and French. Yes, the programmes aren't all "Qui voudra un Millionair?" Some of them are even more gripping, like "Des Chiffres et des Lettres".

Boos, hisses and Missile Cakes at Arrow Publishing. Emma Forrest's sublime "Namedropper" is now in remainder stores. Those in the UK are strongly recommended to buy a copy. It's great, even if you can't play the "identify the character" game.

"Internet vandals" my foot. This is a deliberate programme of denial of service attacks that's going on. Compare it to Rent-A-Mob gathering at all the major junctions at rush hour in the city centre, bringing traffic to a halt. Don't compare it to a bunch of spotty kids who think it's cool to spray-paint "Britney ROOLZ" on an unguarded wall.

And finally. Listening to the radio yesterday evening, when the jock read a dedication to members of the Corney Hunt. At least, that's what he was supposed to say... Darn, wish I'd been running a tape under that.

  
missile cakes
feb 11

Chelle Finkler, first lady of cool cakes:
oooh! oooh! more cake torture!
will it never end?!

chelle
society for prevention of cruelty against cakes!

Chellebelle, the whole point of The Missile Cake is that it is to be thrown and splatted. The object of The Missile Cake is to provide something small, slightly unpleasant, that sticks to the face and causes maximum embarrassment. The recipe was put together by members of Berkhamsted WI, and was inspired by the incident last week when a member of the audience lobbed a chocolate eclair onto the Agriculture Minister. That's a waste of a good chocolate eclair, so here's how to make one.

Make a normal Victoria sponge mix, thickened with a little treacle and make it about four inches across. You may want to bake a big one, then cut it up. Put cream cheese on top and in the middle, along with some jam. Then leave it out for two days - not refrigerated, just left on the work-surface to mature. The Missile Cake is then taken to the public appearance of the recipient, and thrown at them from short range.

Do not attempt to eat the cake, as it's very sweet and not healthy. Especially after being left on the side for a couple of days.

  
thoughts of the day
feb 12

I hear that sometime Slashdot correspondent and all-round annoyance attractor Jon Katz is a published author. (First Brem, now Katz... there must be hope for me yet.) And his minimum opus has been featured in Rolling Stone, the magazine for the terminally hip. The book sounds somewhat less interesting than the memoirs of former British finance minister Norma "Badger" Lament. Bet it won't be 20 months before he's remaindered.

Amazing scenes on SMtv this morning. Phone-in contest, where viewer directs celebrity to shoot paintballs at balloons full of paint. Caller comes on line, grunts at hosts. "Did we wake you up? Are you carrying on a conversation in the background? I don't think he'll do that well," say the hosts. Caller goes on to work methodically round the board, picking up the all-time record high score. Presenters are utterly gobsmacked. I know itv's working on "It Shouldn't Happen On Children's TV", and this is a classic moment that deserves re-editing the show.

  
dammit
feb 12

Victoria C "57 Hours. How long?":
So my stupid temp agency finally called.
Happy new year, agency. As I seriously piss people off by saying.

Then she tells me that they've scheduled me for another interview. Guess when it is. That's right, Tuesday.
I thought you were going to say 5pm Monday.

Then she proceeds to get all bitchy to me because she says I've been inquiring about jobs and she had the understanding that I wanted them to find something fulltime for me. Yeah, duh, I've been inquiring about jobs for months and they never returned my calls. They finally schedule me for something without contacting me to see if I was available that day and then they get pissed off that I can't go. I asked for her to reschedule for the next week and she said 'we'll just forget these jobs I had in mind and you can call me when you are available' Oh dear, I feel some lists coming on.
1) If they can't sell you, they don't get paid. This relationship calls for professionalism, openness and honesty from both parties. This is clearly not happening.
2) You are within your rights to ask for the employers' details and contact them yourself. Underhand and sneaky, but giving as good as you get. How to get those details is up to you, sadly. ):
3) The other jobs she had in mind were probably only in her mind, not in the real world. In my experience, agencies advertise loads of positions that seem not to exist. I'm waiting to be proven wrong.

This weekend my sister wants to have another 'discussion' 1) He is coming over.
2) You have no problem with this.
3) Deal with 1 and 2.

I think under the circumstances that he and I are doing amazing at staying focused. Everyone around us is telling us we're bad people doing the wrong thing.
1) You are not bad people for following your dreams.
2) You are not doing wrong in following your dreams.
3) You will be happy with Brendan.
4) Anyone who disagrees can come round here and go ten rounds with me and my mate Mike.

Screw them,
In the old thumbrack sense, not any other.

I need to hug my best friend.
In which case, high-fives. (:

  
valentines
feb 13

paulo:
So, my point is... anybody is in my same situation? Anybody has some good suggestions?
Well, I've already written off to Smiffs. The major newsagent and bookseller chain has been running an in-store commercial promising "valentine's cards for everyone." Except those who are single. And those whose other half has run off and shacked up with some other blighter. And those who want to dump their couch chums but don't know how. Then there's the social problem of buying a "to my boyfriend" card when you're male. Might raise some very odd glances from the cashier, but that may just be part and parcel of being out. I don't know, this is all just hypothetical.

No, their in-store ads are a load of cobblers, and they really ought to be stopped. Letters, as they say, have been writ. Head office really ought to be on its knees, in a more-grovelling-than-Ebony way.

(Oh, yes, and one more thing: I'm not bitter. No, really. Not at all).
It shows.

No, Monday I shall do my usual stuff. A little bit of shopping. A trip into Warwick to plan out my route for an interview on Thursday. Watch my usual bag of television (including "Who Shot Mr Burns?"). And flick the channel on every time someone uses the V-word or the L-word, just as I've been doing for the past couple of weeks.

  
katz-bashing
feb 13

Eric Geyer:
Hah! Did you know that Mr. Katz is a fiction author too?
You mean this isn't the first time someone's paid good money to print one of his books? [Insert picture of weaver looking utterly amazed.] It must be a tax dodge. That's all I can think of.

I was walking past a local used-book emporium, and in the one-dollar-out-on-the-sidewalk-we- don't-care-if-they-are-stolen book rack was a copy of one of his pieces of fiction.
Pay a dollar for the sort of gubbins one could get for the cost of a phone call from slashdot? Not me - I'd sooner buy a muffin. Ah, muffin.

From a quick perusal of the cover, I determinded that it was some form of mystery novel,
[This is becoming a touch predictable]
The main mystery being why it was written (:

and that the author was indeed the same Jon Katz I was familiar with. It may not have been remaindered, but it has reached a much more ignominious end.
As do all poor authors.

Thanks for sharing, and giving me the best laugh I've had in ages.

  
tv and video
feb 15

So, the BBC finally got round to showing "Who Shot Mr Burns" last night. "Great," I thought, "one I've not caught on the numerous re-runs the BBC has been doing. Part one tonight, and it must be part two on Friday. Or next Monday." But after the show, VoiceOverMan comes on to report there will be More New Simpsons later in the year. This is a definition of "new" I'm not familiar with, as the show is about five years old. Grr. Just for the record, I have seen the denoument on SKY before now, but won't give away who the culprit was here.

News from the video people: "The Flashing Blade" has been passed for video release. Uncut, and (sadly) undubbed. "Ooh, Flash, there's a bee in my laundry." It wasn't them that had the thing about Rick Astley, but the one with the crocodile in the sewer... Sorry, going right back to kids television of the late 80s there.

  
victims
feb 15

Starting thought: isn't this sort of debate exactly what the advertisers wanted to happen? And are we just playing into their hands by venting in this manner? Mull it over before responding...

Angela Bigos:
I saw an interview with the ad creator and it really pissed me off because he was trying to make it sound like Benneton's only (sniff-sniff-such nobility!) goal here was to...well...I wasn't quite sure if it was to champion the cause of the victim's family or to make a statement against capital punishment.
Does he know? Does the company know? Is this a well-thought-out campaign? "Noes" all round, I think.

The bottom line is, these people are in BUSINESS and will do, literally, anything that will put their product in the mind of the potential purchaser.
This is spot-on right.

The families of crime victims feel double victimization
[...]
And are they ever compensated? No.

There's no form of compensation for this? Certainly there is in England; the payouts are paltry - around 20,000 to a murder victim's relatives, more for major disabilities - but they are an expression of society's regret at the loss.

I know you're probably thinking that I'm pro capital punishment, whether I am or not isn't the point, exploitation is.
What the point is depends on what question one is considering. If one's considering the welfare of the victims of the crimes, that is a valid statement. If one is considering the standard of justice that defendants in capital crimes receive, there's a whole other raft of questions. Ones that relate to the standard of justice in the US and whether it meets basic human rights standards.

There are now twelve countries negotiating to join the European Union. In order to join, they have to pass a series of quite stringent tests, including a human rights dimension. Free elections, democratic process enshrined in law, free and fair trials, abolition of capital punishment, independent judiciary. You get the picture. Even if the US were minded to join the EU, it would flunk this particular test.

The bottom line to me is, if you're in a business where you're making big bucks in this particularly unsavory way, then you damn well should be compensating either the victim's families or put a great big ol' chunk of change into some sort of victim's advocacy fund (or stop capital punishment fund or both to really play fair).
Don't think she's hugely impressed by this campaign (:

There are only two plausible reasons I can see for the death penalty- a) It is proven to give at least some of the suffering families a measure of relief
In The Top Ten Axioms According To Moses, "Thou Shalt Not Kill" is a non-mover at number 7. "Thou Shalt Not Covet Thy Neighbour's Ass" just makes the cut at number 10. In order to prevent a conceivable violation of axiom 10, there's a flagrant breach of axiom 7. This breaks the logical structure of law. No good.

b) those who have to be given non full-life sentences because of errors in their trials
Error in the process? The conviction really ought to be thrown out and a fresh trial ordered.

kill again (this is a documented fact- especially in the case of child killers who cannot stifle the urge to kill again
All of them? All of them?

because I think prison without possibility of parole is a far worse punishment that execution.
Same conclusion, different lines of reasoning.

In all the zillions of target groups they poll, they want to know what the age group their clothing appeals to is thinking about and ready to take up verbal arms against and therefore willing to spend money to feel they're in defense of.
Yet if the company wanted to make slick adverts extolling their brand, there are many less controversial ways of doing it. Witness the hugely successful campaign from Gap Clothing.

It's a policy decision for Bennetton to tie their brand to a certain political stance. To push against the boundaries of acceptability and taste. Whether that works or not is up to the individual.

They aren't doing ads about the cure for Alzheimer Lizzie (a noble cause - my first mother in law died of it and it's a horrific degrading disease) because it wouldn't get your motor running.
Does it fit into their branding? Is it a controversial issue? Can one portray this affliction on a poster? While it may be worthy, it ain't controversial, nor does it address a running conflict in society.

They are in business to make money and if going on the anti-abortion bandwagon made them more money, you can bet they'd find an attractive hip way to package it.
Consult reputable economics books (or Anderton's. I've not forgotten Wednesday mornings :)

helping the mother whose child has been murdered, or the grandmother who's been beaten into a coma after being robbed of her life's saving are good things too.
Would it not be more instructive to address the cause of the problem, rather than treating the symptoms? Why do people feel so excluded from society that they do these things?

Perhaps the victims families should be allowed to decide- we're only fence sitters until it happens to us.
The victims' families are the last people I'd trust with that decision. They've got too much emotion invested in the case. I'd far sooner see sentencing decisions made by a competent, independent observer.

There are groups which offer *real* help- money and health care and adoption and all kinds of support and back off if the woman goes for the termination (admitedly those groups are regretably few).
There is one such group in the UK, headed by the Catholic church in Scotland. This group goes directly against the Vatican Council's teachings "not to be insensitive to any aspect of human life." Yet Catholics reject any dialogue over abortion and contraception, in spite of the lack of respect for this position amongst their congregation.

It's not surprising, given the Pope's disregard for his own office's report. Yet he proclaimed 2000 as a Jubilee Year, marking a concern for reconciliation and seeking forgiveness for those harmed and misjudged by the Church.

Something doesn't add up.

  
profit and society
feb 16

eLixzer:
I think victims advocacy groups are, in general, horrific, because the rights they represent are much less valuable for the most part than the due process rights they try to take away
Let's not beat about the bush: due process must be done, and must be seen to be done. Any infringement, even the appearance of an attempted infringement, is not acceptable. Now, if victim groups can work within that framework, then all's great and wonderful. I have no significant experience on how well or badly English groups perform against this yardstick.

One is that I'm not convinced that businesses can't have a dual motive of earning profit and doing good stuff in the world.
They can. It's a commonly-accepted macro-economic theory called profit satiation (or something like that. It's years since I took ECON40.) In simple terms, shareholders see company as vehicle for making return on their investment, but also see damage being done - known to economists as "negative externalities". The usual example is acid rain.

According to free market theorists, companies will attempt to maximize profit. According to the profit satiation theory, shareholders will accept a lower profit in exchange for reducing the negative externalities. This increases the shareholder's overall satisfaction from owning part of the company - less satisfaction from the money, but more from doing something worthwhile.

While not universally accepted, this is the model that stands behind the concept of trade agreements and bodies, where companies band together and agree standards regarding their impact on the rest of the environment (as in the physical, mental, emotional world.)

Go find a good economics textbook to explain it further. My economics teacher recommends Alain Anderton's books, but that's because he is A. Anderton.

And two is that even if all businesses are only out there to make a profit, I'd MUCH rather they do it BY doing good stuff.
Curiously, this second-order effect (combatting the negative externalities as a form of promotion) doesn't appear in the PProfit model. Maybe it's just too confusing.

I think I ought to show my support for them by buying their clothes when it makes sense for me to do so in the same way I boycott Dominoe's because they give profits to pro-life groups.
They do? Bu*-er. Safeway frozen pizza next year, then, Mark. Oh, and I'll be walking back from the town centre, seeing as how Stagecoach is supporting the keep section 28 campaign in Scotland. Probably carrying said frozen pizza.

I think they're both free to give their money to political causes if they wish, even in the name of profit, and I'll take my chance to control where MY money goes by deciding which companies to patronize.
Then there's the argument that one may not need to consume at such a rate. But that's for another month.

  
schultz
feb 16

Sade Foley:
*sniff*
Charles M. Schultz has died
:o(
*sniff*

We will remember him. "Security blanket", he's given to the English language. And all of Woodstock's memorable quotes. And Snoopy. And Charlie Brown's heroic failures. And confirmation that life isn't all good stuff.

Sade
a Peanuts worshipper btw

Gone, but never to be forgotten.

  
valentine's day rant
feb 18

paulo:
I said it once, and I'll say it again: our world is relationship-obssesed.
I'd put it a different way. Western mainstream culture is obsessed with straight sex.

Watch or listen to any piece of mainstream pop-culture: you'll think that all we're here for is to date, go out on fancy dinners, make out and finding the inexistent Mr. or Ms. Right
I don't see much of that in hit West End musicals "Spend Spend Spend", "The Lion King" or "Rent!" Nor on the world-wide ratings leader, "Who Wants to be a Millionaire". Contestants want to consume, travel, save; not buy an Asian bride.

(and I don't want discussions now about whether "inexistent" is a valid english word).
OK, we'll come back to it later (: [It isn't in COD10, but is in Chambers after Milton used it.]

We have to go out every day and see, hear about how we are somehow NOT normal for trying to find our own way.
Much as I hate to disagree with my learned correspondent, I'm going to have to. I don't get any feeling of being abnormal full stop. Relationships are something that other people have. I hear no-one presuming to speak for "us" when discussing men with girlfriends. I see couples draped over each other in commercials, and wonder why the advertisers insist on losing 35% (or whatever) of their sales. I hear much about the down side of divorce on society, and very little about the happiness it may bring.

We're subjected to the psychological pressure of having to find a date, a crush, a boyfriend/girlfriend or else we'll be looked with suspicious eyes
As listie Sarah found at her formal dance just recently, this really is psychological pressure. It's all in the imagination. Not in the real world. In fact, I can think of exactly no times when I've felt any expectation to have a date. School dance? Half the year turned up single. University ball? Invite a friend after she'd made a dress and had nowhere to wear it. And made quite sure everyone knew we weren't an item.

Don't you think that, after all the horror stories we've heard about the subject, we should take anything related with "love" with at least a grain of salt?
Ah, take everything with bagfuls of salt. Including this injunction to take things with salt.

And yet, when I finally decide to make a comparatively tame and mostly tongue-in-cheek post stating my views, I have to be lectured by some relationship propagandist about not ruining other people's happiness.
Ah, he used the "p" word. Propaganda. That's harsh. Very harsh. Spin. Interpretation. My "this irks once in a while but isn't anything to get worked up about" is someone else's major hang-up. It does seem to be a matter of degree, of personal values.

Besides, the original post didn't strike me as much more than a civil disagreement with the views originally put forward. Is that propaganda? Is that worthy of being called a deliberate distortion of the truth to achieve one's own ends?

Are you so determined to exterminate those of us who choose the less travelled path that you must accuse us of raining on your parade,
We're not dealing with daleks here. No-one's going to do any exterminating. Besides, has anyone ever seen a dalek try to reproduce? Maybe that's what the sink plungers were for. "Ooh baby is that a firm plunger or are you pleased to see me," said in a monotonous voice. Oh no, I'm getting confused with William Hague again.

when your "side" hasn't stopped *ever* in its attempts to make us feel inadequate freaks?
Again, you're on your own here. I have no feeling of inadequacy from not being coupled. I feel no freakery for that, or any other, reason. I hear no-one muttering that I'm still single. I have no-one, least of all parents, trying to fix me up with other people.

I can't wait for the day when the single people of the world join in a class action lawsuit against Hollywood for all the emotional damage that their sappy romances have inflicted upon us.
And then he wonders why films don't interest me? If a record is dull or tedious or offensive or winds me up the wrong way (or all four, Mariah) it's over within four minutes and I've lost no money. Films cost and last about 25 times as long.

Anyway. Enough from me.

  
week by week
feb 19

Right, you lot. Post more, or there are selections from what I've been doing.

Monday 14th: To Asda, get some milk and a pizza marked down to 79p. That'll do for tea tonight.
Catch the train to Warwick, preparing for Thursday's interview. It's only 15 minutes from the station to Shire Hall, much cheaper and faster than the bus. Walk back, it's almost flat and clearly viable for cycling.
There's an answerphone from upstairs around 11, with enough volume to make it sound like it's mine in the next room.

Tuesday 15th: To Sainsbury's, for bread, cereal and other bodkins.
Another interview in the pipeline, in south Birmingham next week.
Trip into town, where someone's offering the Fugees and Aerosmith's recent cds for six quid each. They don't stay long on the shelves.
Pmail swallows my mail; the server seems to be out of action totally.
The "Eleven O'Clock Show" returns. No Sascha Baron-Cohen this time, which can't be bad at all. And any show with presenters called Daisy and Iain (properly spelt, too!) can't be at all bad.

Wednesday 16th: Up at 7:30 to download yesterday's mail before it gets expensive.
Pop into the library looking for today's papers, but all the serious ones have gone walkabout. This is not impressive.
The cops come round early evening, looking for a Martin Berry. To the best of my knowledge, he's not lived here since 1996.
TOTP2 is really spoiled by Steve Wrong's commentry. Jabber, jabber, jabber. Just shut up and let the music do the talking. Good to see the full, unexpurgated version of American Pie, though.

Thursday 17th: Into Warwick for the 9am interview, and with time to spare. Meet the prospective manager, and the help desk leader. Talk for about 25 minutes about my experience, CV and how to run a help desk. Then there's a practical, which doesn't faze me too much.
Back home for 10:30, which isn't bad at all.
Last nights "zero30" was a hoot, with a report from a new "Super Club" with a huge celebrity attendance. Little Billie Piper and a 30 minute cameo from Robbie Williams.
The American charts come out. Santana's back as the #1 album. Now that Tesco and Asda are marking chart discs down to 9 quid, I may have to (gasp!) buy one in this country.
Mariah's off the top of the singles chart after just one week, which is hurrahsome. "Amazed", Brendan and Vic's song, climbs into the top 3, and Mark will be pleased that Gretchen's "Breathe", as recorded by Faith Hill, is top 5.

Friday 18th: Back to Sainsbury's: de-meated burgers and some choccies today. I think I deserve it.
Put together some applications from yesterday's adverts. I'd like to get the one from yesterday, but it's me against six others.
New No Doubt and Bluetones on yesterday's "Videotech". And an advert so cheap it looked like things from 3-2-1 twenty years ago.
A team that does amazing things on "Fort Boyard". If the mob from Featherstone have to be beaten, these are worthy candidates.

[That's enough diary for now - Ed]

  
it's not fair
feb 19

judy:
Well, I guess it is my time to ramble than. Ha, so there now that's what you get from being all so quiet! ;)
Ramble away. It's the only way we'll get this list moving again.

I haven't told you about my last weekend yet. It was quite ok, I helped out at a Setter Derby
It sounds like a race for finding the fastest dog of the breed (:

I got a Valentine's heart yesterday! :) We don't celebrate Valentine's day in Austria, we just talk about it a bit and some couples do but it is not *that* big thing here.
Paulo, you know where to go this time next year. (:

they asked people on the radio if the mind that the "Valentuesday" is on a Monday that year!
Do they mind if Tuesday is Monday? I feel a Chris Morris interview coming on...
CM: Do you think the letter of the law is important?
Man on Street: Yes.
CM: And what is the letter of the law?
MS: K.
CM: K?
MS: K.
CM: And how large is it, this K?
MS: About six, seven feet high.
CM: How close should people follow it, this six foot high K?
MS: As close as is safe.
CM: This close?
MS: Closer than that.
CM: This close?
MS: Perhaps, perhaps a little closer.
[ctd on the hour]

people on the radio said that they couldn't care less and that they don't mind because X-mas is not on a Saturday either! What? What has that to do w/ that?
What does it matter? Christmas is not on a Saturday, Valentuesday is not on a Thursday, Easter is not on a Sunday.

I couldn't quite understand why X-mas should be on a Saturday.
That makes New Year's Day fall on a Saturday, and the Eve fall on a Friday. As tests at shim city III showed, this is the optimal configuration of the calendar.

But I'd like to go dancing again! :) I haven't been for sooooooooooo long! :(
Ah, but how often is it Wednesday. And remember all those extra Wednesdays you got a few weeks ago? This is where we got them from.

For the ones that got 'til here - wow, respect how can someone stand so much nonsense and boring crap?
If I dish it out, I ought to be able to take it back.

  
what did i watch
feb 20

Three reviews from yesterday's television: "Daria" at alt.lawndale.com; "The Tribe" episodes 85-86; and "Friends Like These", the BBC's new game show. The review of "The Tribe" inevitably contains plot spoilers.

"Daria: alt.lawndale.com", MTV Animations on 5, 1600. The second episode still features Splendora's discordant theme music before it got tidied up. Our heroine is pressured into doing something out of class to assist her college application form, and raises funds to rebuild the internet cafe. Daria's not pleased, but plays along and exacts her revenge in a way that doesn't surprise regular viewers.

There are plot lines that are spun out through the development of the show: Helen Morgandorfer's busy life, reflected in the strange phenomenon of a family meal; Jake's complete inability to back his wife up on anything; the difference in attitudes towards the popular and intelligent sisters.

A great show, of course.

"The Tribe", Cloud 9 for 5, 1656. [Once again: pretty major plot spoilers contained. You have been warned.] After Ebony's breathtaking speech last episode, she's the hero of the hour. Bray, Ellie, Lexx and Tai-San all want to talk with her, and all for their own reasons. It's clear that the experience has radically altered Ebony's personality, and she may well have turned a new leaf. Or maybe not.

There's an undercurrent of misplaced love running through many of the characters; Dal's position as crush object for two younger characters leads to some well-meaning and sensible advice from one of his female elders. Ryan oversteps the mark in the most egregious way, and it's clear that he can read emotions as poorly as Jordan Catalano. Positive reinforcement from Danni causes Ellie to react in a most unexpected way, but one that is consistent with her character.

There are crushes aplenty, with Alice causing Dal's jaw to hit the ground, Ebony encouraged by Tai-San to pursue her heart, Salene looking to move away, and Lexx looking out for himself as usual. Even lovebirds Jack and Ellie aren't immune to the change going round. Whether the writers would contemplate letting Ebony and Danni become an item remains to be seen.

With the plague and survival issues dealt with early in the second series, there could have been a large gap at the heart of the plot. But it's been filled by an urge to impose some form of order on the anarchic city; a broad thrust that encourages reflection on the state of the world and society.

I really can't recommend this programme highly enough; with Buffy going through a sticky patch at the moment, "The Tribe" may just about have become my highlight of the week's viewing.

"Friends Like These", BBC1, 1830. Hosts Ant McPartlin and Declan Donnoley started life on children's drama "Byker Grove". Via their children's comedy show, a pop career they'd really rather forget, the pair wound their way to ITV's Saturday morning show SM:TV Live. They now return to the Beeb after four years on a new studio game show.

The concept is simple: groups of five friends are given physical and skill-based tasks to compete in head-to-head competition. The winners get a chance to play for an exotic holiday, this week in Mexico. A team of five young ladies from Leeds and young gentlemen from Leicester nominate one player to play each game.

The challenges themselves are reminiscent of Channel 4's famous "Crystal Maze". The "Catch as many balls as you can" game, the "Move a ball through a maze using your body weight" game, the "Guide a basketball through a course on a stream of hot air" game, and the "Untangle yourself from a corset of knots" game are all worth one point to the winner. The final game, "Tiddle as many winks as you can" is worth one point per wink properly tiddled. In a close game - such as tonight's - this is as dramatic as a football shoot-out, but wouldn't be as effective in a one-sided game.

In the finale, the five friends are sat on chairs and have to answer a question about one of their friends. If the chosen friend gets the question right, the chum doing the choosing travels. If not, she stays home.

There is a sting in the tail, though: the contestants travelling can elect to gamble their tickets for travel for the whole team. The question is a massive tension moment, but accepting or declining the gamble - splitting the group - is surely the test of friendship. Once accepted, the five will remain together no matter what.

While the gameplay is great, the presentation owes a lot to Millionaire. Music runs almost the whole way through - though the sharp, loud stings were thrown off Millionaire after the pilot - and there are vari-lights and unusual camera sweeps. It's badly let down by the baritone voice-over of Mitch Johnson, best known for his warm, friendly contribution to BBC Saturday show Live & Kicking. Perhaps a deep bass, such as Tommy Vance, would have added to the tension rather than reduce it.

The presenters try to use their famed sense of humour, but most of it seems to fall on the cutting room floor. "Put your faith in a friend" will catch on, "Pick a mate to decide your fate" won't. No-one, but no-one, asks to "phone a friend".

A feelgood ending is guaranteed even if the team loses the holiday. For that, and for the broad range of games, this show gets a A-rating.

  
fish
feb 21

paulo:
Someone should go to the rulers of the soccer business (TV channels, UEFA & FIFA, team owners, etc.) and tell them that story about the chicken and the golden eggs... (I suppose that fable exists in the english-speaking world?)
Pretty much, though it's a goose in our translation. One wonders if a unified calendar would reduce the amount of football played. It would certainly make the start of the season into more of an event than it is now.

The problem is that he hasn't shined specially in that role either.
That does surprise. Maybe this is just the wrong player for the role.

Mr. Weaver, you clearly don't understand the long story of triumph and leadership behind Real Madrid's tradition. Here we have a saying: "to be second is a failure", and we believe in it. Like, seriously.
Ah. My error is that I'm judging Real's performance by the standards I'd expect of a side in the English league, where qualification for Europe two years running is an achievement. Not the large fish in smaller pond of (say) the Scottish league.

nor we're used to fight "only" for a place in Champions' League. That's for losers like, erm, Barcelona.
Ah, yes, good old Barcelona. Coming third in a group behind BYM and MUN shows just how deep that side's quality runs.

We're used to win, and win big time. These last years have really been identity-shaking for us... [sigh].
Then be glad you don't support Mexico. "Surprise results," say the BBC. "Clunk," said the floor after my jaw hit it.

  
bye, buffy?
feb 22

Angela Bigos:
What's next? "That Seventies Show"?
Last year, I wrote at length about ITV's grand experiment in remaking TSS in the UK. And laughed in a wild, uncontrollable way as "Days Like These" spiralled down and down the ratings. Blowing the 8pm Friday slot, it transferred to 530 Saturdays. Even with the lead-in of an England rugby match, it failed. Transferring to digital and cable channel ITV2, it floated down the schedule from 8 to 10, finishing up in the "We have to air this for contractual reasons, but we won't show it when anyone's actually watching" slot at 130am. To around 130 viewers, probably.

The final nail in the coffin came this weekend, when viewers to ITV in the Midlands were treated to an episode of "That 70s Show" at midnight. According to a friend who watched it, it was just as bad as the UK remake.

And speaking of t.v.
"Angel" has been bought by Channel 4. They intend to air it from this summer, before the BBC has caught up with "Buffy". Cue mass confusion.

Probable slot: 6pm Tuesday / 12 noon Sunday from early September.
Smart slot: 8pm Thursday
Too Smart slot: 5:30 Saturday. Kill the Brookside Omnibus, no-one's interested in that any more.

in Entertainment Weekly they clearly said that Willow was going to "explore her sexuality".
[Weaver stifles a yawn]
This is the hallmark of a show that is in trouble, and knows it's in trouble. Witness "Ellen". Witness "Po5". Witness "Manchester Prep", the show so bad it got cancelled before debut.

Things do not look good in Sunnydale. There can be only one response to this minor crisis - open a book on When Will Buffy End?
8/1 This summer (season 4)
3/2 Sept 00 - Aug 01 (season 5)
2/1 Sept 01 - Aug 02 (season 6)
5/1 Sept 02 - Aug 03 (season 7)
16/1 Sept 03 - Aug 04 (season 8)
33/1 later

For those preferring to spread bet:
Months From Mar 1 00 To The Cancellation Decision: 19 - 23

All bets to Honest Ron and his out of work jockeys - sorry, betting collection agents. Call direct on 1-800-U-L00SAH

#Honest Ron. Honest Ron. The others are a con.#

Seriously, though, I reckon the show will begin to run out of steam sooner rather than later, and the acters and writers will want to move on to other projects. Five or six years is a great run, enough for syndication, and allows everyone to leave before the iron stops being hot.

my problem is that I feel that they're using Willow, exploiting her for *ratings*- not because they want to show diversity
[jaw drops a mile]
Actually, it doesn't. The WB network is having a terrible season. Its lead shows are off by around 20%, and the network has fallen behind Viacom's UPN for fifth place. Any stunt that the network can do, they will do.

The only thing that holds me back is that this is not entirely out of keeping with Willow's character. Without giving much away, she's never been a Rampant Heterosexual in the way Buffy has been. There's always been a certain reservation about her attachments; not least the safe, unthreatning crush on Xander.

The clinching point will be the timing of this. Does it occur during Sweeps? If not, this is no stunt, this is planned and plotted drama.

When you see Scully and Mulder finally doing the wild thang, you'll know that cancellation is right around the corner.
Or you've fallen asleep and your usual dream cast has been replaced by desperate "actors" with egos the size of Saturn but talent the size of asteroid 249553.

doesn't it just feel like we're being *hosed* here? Opinions?
One of the running jokes on "Friends" is the way everyone assumes Chandler was gay. From the moment Joey went for the flat, through Heckles' diary, right to the time Chandler and Monica went away for their weekend watching cop car chases on the television, there's been an assumption that Mr Bing will follow in his father's footsteps. Yet the writers have steadfastly refused to allow the character to become involved with another man. Or portray him as anything other than a straight guy.

Friends is looking good for renewal to 2003. These factors may not be coincidence.

  
monday tuesday
feb 23

It was a good day, weatherwise, was Tuesday. Sunny, but with a distinct nip in the air again. Reminded me of being in Toronto - gosh, is it almost a year since that trip? The travel bug is beginning to bite again, but I need a job first. I'm thinking return to Canada for the World Series this October. Middle of October, get my Christmas shopping done cheaply, see some great baseball (hopefully) and Have A Time.

To Warwick Uni last night to see My Life Story. It's a band, Chelle, and a dashed good one at that. They may be arty, they may engage in complex wordplay, but that's just my cup of tea. Sadly, not the cup for all the students, as the band attracted a "crowd" of 150. In a hall that would hold about 800. They missed a treat.

While there, I bumped into one of the people who spends time at RAW, the university's radio station. If I'm still around over Easter, they'll let me spend some time there. A special Eurosong programme was mentioned, which is right up my boulevard. And, yes, I'll be previewing the event here in a month or so.

Children from school are on half term. They're crowding up the streets, and getting underfoot. The parents with pushchairs are even worse, the way they go so slowly and block the pavement. Out of the blinkin' way, you blighters!

Ah, obABBA. "Take a Chance On Me." The change of tempo from the chorus, using lots of dotted semi-quavers and quavers

# If you change your mind, I'm the first in line
# Honey I'm still free, take a chance on me

... to the languid, crotchet-and-minim verse

# We can go da-ancin'
# We can go wa-alkin'
# Long as we're together

Brilliant.

Spotted a real bargain in Smith's reduced books section. "The Guide To The Internet: Updated for '95". With huge sections on WAIS, ARCHIE, Veronica, Gopher and UUTP mail. This slice of ancient history is yours for ten pounds. It was overpriced at the time!

Question for you music fans: Cover of "Crying" as a male/female duet. It is not the Roy Orbison / k d lang duet - I'd recognise her tones a mile off, even over AM radio from Belgium. Any ideas?

Melanie C on "The Priory". Is this the moment when Mark's prediction comes to fruition, live on the last episode of the Zoe 'n' Jamie show? Not through Theakston's interview, but what about Hannah's question. Her favourite colour of car? What sort of question is that, little miss smart-behind? Cuh. Wasted. Utterly wasted.

  
mpeg-tastic
feb 24

I'm not intending to put a dampner on what is an accurate summary, but to provide a slightly different opinion.

The Glittertastic Lauren:

MP3s--ah, my new best friend. Basically an MP3 is a full audio version of a song. The size of the file is relatively small, which makes MP3s easy to download and store on your harddrive.
Of course, to reduce the size of the file, something has to give. It's the information in the file. MPEG compression [1] works by taking the original sound, sorting out the bits a listener can hear from the bits they can't, and only recording the important stuff.

The practical upshots of this are two-fold. One, the size of the file is reduced to about 10% of the original. Two, the quality is lower. Listening to an MPEG at computer rates [2, 3] is no substitute for a CD.

you can download whole CDs for free.
obLegal: This is a breach of copyright, and does diddle the artiste concerned out of their royalties. If you wish to keep the recording, you may wish to buy a CD or cassette (remember them?) and treat the MPEG as a backup.

It's great for trying out new bands. If you don't like the song---just delete it.
Other servers are available, including mp3.com. Acts available there include Sister Machine Gun, and they're great. [4]

Hope this helps. Really technical footnotes follow.

[1] MPEG = Motion Picture Experts Group. The sound layer of their Third Standard is commonly referred to as MP3. It's possible to include pictures - motion or otherwise - with the sound.

[2] 128Kbits/sec is a bitrate similar to that of a CD player, but the psychoacoustic compression still applies.

[3] SKYdigital includes 40 channels of music, compressed using their non-standard, proprietary technique. There are differences between the CD and SKY sound, but it requires very close listening to detect them. Similarly, the pan-European digital tv standard is also a lot closer to CD quality than is MPEG-3.

[4] As chellebelle will agree.

  
reasons to be cheerful
feb 25

1) It's been a sunny day.

2) This Countdown champion is not much cop. Using my patented three-handed scoring system, I've managed to beat him for the past two nights, and I'm not very good at the letters. Hah!

3) Santana wins lots of Grammies, Birtney and the Muppet go away with hands as empty as their heads. Hah!

4) As Gambo will say tomorrow, the USA has a new number one single. Only it's not Savage Garden, it's Vic and Brendan's theme song, "Amazed". A song I raved about back in August. Hah!

5) Oasis' album launch party was a flop, and they've resorted to attacking Monkey Features purely because he's way more successful than they'll ever be again. Nah-nah-na-nah-nah!

6) I have a job. IT support for one of the teaching support agencies, and it's based in South Birmingham. Looking for a new place to live in the southern end of Britain's Best City will come in a few months, as (hopefully) will a trip to Ireland. Canada in October is looking good, too. Hurrah!

  
so who watched..?
feb 26

[email protected]:
"...Fox's "Who Wants to Marry a Multimillionaire" drew 16 million viewers and was particularly a hit among young women..."
Shurely "was seen in an estimated 16 million households across the US (research accurate to +- 0.2 million nuclear households, nineteen times in twenty; sample does not generalise to student or mobile populations.)

Young women? Really? How? Why? Frankly, this surprises me a lot. Is there a rationale for such a revelation? Or is this information about as accurate as the, erm, audience ratings for MSCL that Nielsen served five years ago? (The source is the same, apparently).
According to print media, the show was a ratings winner, the sort of thing that appealed widely. The "particularly a hit among younger womyn" is more dodgy: F*X-UP scored more female viewers than usual that night, but I've seen no substantiation that the new audience was different from their usual, young, demographic.

And speaking of which... [lowers voice until it reaches "gossip tone"]: anybody saw The Show in Question? What are your comments?
From what I've seen, the show had too many DOGs around. The clip supplied to the BBC had the show's title in the top left, clashing with the News 24 DOG. There was also the F*X-UP logo bottom right, and the News 24 clock bottom left. So much on-screen graffiti.

Game show lists suggest the presentation was typical game show fare, pre-Millionaire. Which doesn't cut the mustard any more.

(From the descriptions published in the spanish newspapers, one might be tempted to mention the Angela Chase quote about "seeing a car accident"...)
It looked like the perfect excuse to settle down in front of the television and watch Bush Minor and McGain tear strips out of each other while Key looked on and tutted over them in a morally superior way.

And there's probably more chance of two of those participants spending a long time together.

  
gold cup
feb 26

Jamie Morrison:
Your loss. :) That was a joke, just in case you thought I'd suddenly developed severe delusions of grandeur. :)
Ah, but you don't have to suffer Gary Lineker's stultifyingly dreary delivery. A pot plant would have more screen presence.

>Still, with an extra two spots in Europe the season after next,
>Hearts may get into the European League Qualification Phase. All
>they've got to do is beat Dundee U and Celtic.
Two words - pah and hah. Nae tother a ba', as they say. :) (Foolish optimism is in no way a national trait :))

With 2 EuroLeague spots, there will be a second EuroCup spot as well. Fourth place, or possibly the cup final, suffices to qualify. And then there's the tough competition of the We're Not In Kansas Any More Cup.

>leaves Canada and Trinidad and Tobago (!) to play for the
>North American championship on Thursday.
Why the (!)?!?

It's the match-up that absolutely no-one expected. That semi was meant to be Costa Rica -v- Mexico. And, as the final of the continental tournament, it's like Slovenia -v- Lithuania in Euro-oh-oh. No offence to supporters of any of the sides, but this is totally unexpected.

Trinidad are a great team, they'll beat Canada no problem.
One-nil, one-nil one-nil one-nil. One-nil. One-nil.

Would you like me to put those words into alphabetti spaghetti, so you can eat them? (:

And why are you glad I think Mexico aren't good? Have you something against them? :)
Nope, other than they always win. Until this time. And I'm laughing till my head falls off.

what the hell happened to USA?
Lost on penalties to Colombia in the quarter finals. They would have met Peru in the other semi, and Canada in the final. (Stop tittering.)

And El Salvador, the famous football warring nation?
So good they failed to progress past the qualifying group, losing (IIRC) to Haiti. A side that fell out in the first round, natch.

Btw, you're right, that result is pretty surprising. :) Just in case you thought I'd died. :)
Pretty surprising? Three words: Inverness Caledonian Thistle.

  
what's the point?
feb 27

Bikki!:
Cld some1 explain what the point of the mailing list is?
While there's no official guidance, here's my take.

* To discuss the television series "My So-Called Life" (Bedford Falls Productions for ABC (USA), 1994-5) and matters arising.

* To promote and encourage diversity of thought and well-argued opinion, a hallmark of MSCL.

Notes:
+ The primary language of the list is English. Contributors are strongly discouraged from posting in any other language. As the list enjoys a wide geographical readership, it is not safe to assume that English is the first language of the audience. Contractions that rely on homonym sounds in English are especially deprecated.

+ The content of the list is generally suitable for all age groups.

+ Posters are encouraged to give appropriate warning of matters that may not be appropriate for all readers.

+ "Matters arising" is interpreted in a very broad sense, including reflections on popular and highbrow culture, as well as existential and reality-based reflections on contemporary life as it is lived.

  
footy talk
feb 28

Jamie Morrison:
At least it's not Jimmy Hill. But you do have that hideous bloke with a tache - he's dreary to unheard of degrees.
He's not as zeebsome as Spinnaker, though. Gary's the one that's sent me to sleep on occasion before now. The bloke with the 'tache has a 'tache and they look silly by definition.

>the tough competition of the We're Not In Kansas Any More Cup.
Does that involve lots of Latvians with mullets? Or Estonians with elkhorns? If so, we've been there, done that, collected the 15th place medal just behind Llanfwrongwyllog FC.

Latvians with mulletts? Estonians with elkhorn? No, Jamie, that's the Eurovision Song Contest. This is the summer contest for sides that are pretty darned poor, such as West Ham and Partick Thistle.

Was it Slovenia or Slovakia that qualified? Or neither?
Slovenia, according to my Millionaire 5:13 post. The time when the show was bookended around "Who Wants To Be In Euro-Oh-Oh". Des Lynham looked a right scruff, but that's nothing new.

God, how I hope England are knocked out early on
Who have they got? Romania again, Portugal and Germany again. Group winners to face Sweden or Belgium, runners-up Italy. Might sneak a place in the last eight, but I wouldn't be surprised if they flunk that. Once in the final stages, though, it's looking like quite the lottery.

if they even do slightly well (if I hear the words '1966' one more time, someone's gonna pay)
The only problem is that they've been a good side about twice since. Nothing since 1990.

I can't titter at Peru, not since.....*gulp* THAT happened. Set your mind back to a romantic Scottish world cup campaign......
I wasn't asking you to titter at the concept of Peru in the semis. More the concept of Canada in the final.

Exactly! That's what I'm talking about, perspective! Of course, before that match my wise words were 'Inverness Caledonian Thistle are a great team, they'll beat Celtic no problem'. You win some, you lose some. :)
And now Celtic face court action for failing to refund admission fees for the postponed game. Why did they bother entering the Cup this year, it's bought nothing but trouble...

Two days ago, I wrote this:
One-nil, one-nil one-nil one-nil. One-nil. One-nil.
Which just left Colombia to prevent the most unexpected result in a football tournament. Ever.

Never mind. Losing 2-0 in the final is no disgrace, and at least none of your players put through his own goal. Still, losing the game isn't going to play too well in Bogota.

Full coverage of the end of the world will be shown on CTV Sports every time there's nothing else happening for the next ten years, or until the Canadian soccer side next wins something significant.

  
happy birthday, Ulrike!
feb 28

With Ulrike's fifth birthday (it is your fifth, isn't it:) looming tomorrow, this story from The Times caught my eye.

A grandfather will fulfil a lifetime's ambition tomorrow by holding his 21st birthday party. He just hopes that his Oxford University friends remember the invitations he issued more than 60 years ago.

Martin Grundy was born on February 29, 1916. As a law student in 1937, he celebrated an informal 21st with a few drinks on February 28, and told undergraduates to come to a party in 2000. "I couldn't have had a proper party, it wouldn't have been right," said Mr Grundy, now a retired solicitor in Exeter. "I told them all to wait until 2000." Ever since, he has been telling friends and acquaintances to meet him at the porter's lodge at Corpus Christi College on February 29, 2000.

His original plan to celebrate in college was scuppered when he realised he no longer knew how many guests to expect. He could specify only "somewhere between ten to 100." Instead, he will host a budget supper at the Oxford Union for an estimated 40 to 50 guests. He expects some to come from as far afield as Belgrade, New York and New Zealand.

Mr Grundy placed a reminder in his college newsletter, but kept it cryptic to avoid gatecrashers. It stated simply that an anonymous law student wished to remind people of his deferred celebration on February 29, 2000. He said, "I have waited long enough. We are going to have a good time."

jan 00 ... mar 00
frontlocalmsclmusicnewssport
mail me

00-feb-29
Hosted by www.Geocities.ws

1