MSCList Postings

August 1998


Date: August 28
Subject: numerate

Just in case you've missed the saturation coverage, meet me, Eli Lisa, Sally, Anna and anyone else passing in Hyde Park. 12:30 Sunday. Be there, or be someplace else. More details: see the sig.

Antepenultimate thought on Bill Clintern. Remember back in January, when Hillary appeared on breakfast television? She said that if it was proven that Bill had lied, that would be A Different Matter Entirely. But now we find that he had lied; so, now is it serious?

Angela and Andi interact
summer bad!
Summer good

And summer best left on the shelf, cutting straight from spring to autumn.

[picky="on"]
~Laura quotes
"Don't let the sun go down on me." ~Elton John~

Psst. Elton writes the tunes. Bernie Taupin writes the words.
[picky="off"]

Betsy quotes
Liquor before beer, you're in the clear. Beer before liquor... never sicker.

Ooh! Didn't expect to see that one again in a long time. In the UK, it's generally "wine before beer", but there's never any agreement on whether that's the good or bad combination. Further details are on the "Notes and Queries" pages of the Grauniad

~~Britt
Favorite Radio Station(s): 92.7, 104.3

Oh, wow! I thought I was the only fan of those two. Radio Four, home of the Archers, and Radio Cymru. Very impressed that you can understand the latter one...

Season: autumn and early winter
Can't argue with that, can we.

Krys
When did we change the spelling of my name?

Dammit, Lixz, she noticed.

Angela
Do u smoke: Only during sex. Oh, you didn't mean that...

Someone's been listening to too much Bill Clintern gossip. And, yes, that's the penultimate reference.

Dream Car: The Jetsons car
Goodness! Someone else who remembers the Jetsons! George! Jane! Judy! Elroy! Astro! And wasn't Judy a bit of a babe... well, I thought so...

Sara
people have no fashion sense over here!

Look! It's the This Is True moment!

I've gotten fines for certain things..does that mean I'm convicted of it?
Probably.

and what if they told me that one of my fines would go away if I stayed out of trouble for a year?
That would just show that the Wisconsin legal system fails to live up to its name. Of being systematic. It's full of more loopholes than my mother's knitting.

me and Ross are gong to have thanksgiving here!!! cause they don't celebrate it
This annoys me immensely. A public holiday in mid October would be very pleasant indeed. (Psst: Can I join you guys, so long as you use the Canadian date...)

I don't listen to the radio here in England though...well, except for the american station once in a while ;-)
Ooh, which American station would this be? I'm interested now.

they play such weird songs on their radios....I don't like most of them.
Well, you see, radio design seems to have got stuck in the Black Plastic Is Good era. They look - well - black. What, you mean you don't like the songs?

b*witched just came on..I really like them
Evidently not. Hey! Hey! Hey!

The whole "The doctors say X, but I know a friend of a friend who lived for 3X" thing. This is exactly the sort of innumeracy I obliquely mentioned last time. Of course you'll remember people who lived well past their sell-by date. If they move along before, you forget the optimistic prognosis. It's measured psychology.

Just to cite two examples - which prove diddly squatt. One of my grandparents was given "days" but lasted six months. Another was given five years one October, but didn't see the next new year.

And for an example of someone with a stated life expectancy of 83 but who fell nearly 60% short, watch any television station anywhere in the world this weekend.

Sara neatly sums up the fallacy.
You hear about people living for longer than they should have all the time.
Just because, say, for altzheimers, the statistics say that most people live from 4-8 years (or whatever) after getting it, that doesn't mean that one person won't live for 10 years...or 20 years. However long...you can't jsut base it on statistics.

Examine the distribution. After the first year, it effectively becomes a Normal distribution, with mean at 5 years, and standard deviation of just over 2.5 years. So, 50% of sufferers (actually, a little higher, owing to late diagnoses) are dead after 5 years. 80% don't see 8 years. Only 5% see 10 years. Less than 1% get past 13 years. One in a million might make 20. This is simple statistics; that fewer people know it is an indictment of the Western educational system.

An even stranger indictment is the tidal wave in the Atlantic I joked about two weeks ago. I presented it as a factual report of a prediction - given in good faith - of an event that clearly wasn't going to happen. Yet I now find that people left PEI, and cancelled vacations to Halif*x, based on that clearly inaccurate soothsayer. In spite of the fact that they were far more likely to be killed by a plane crash, food poisoning or an anvil falling out of the sky.

Brooks
Favorite town to chill in: london...eating an ice cream in the park.

12:30, by the bandstand, Hyde. Hope you'll be there...

Emily, welcome back, old chap. Anna, greetings again. In your absences, we've conclusively established that green is the new red, blue is the colour, and the Florida Marlins aren't going to retain the world series.

Liz Variable Name
I would never change my name even if it weren't infinitely cool, but, hey, it also is

Well, it's true that Lixz's name is amazingly cool. It also seems to be infinitely long, if she's not changing it, just bringing different names to the fore and letting us forget about others...

Mark
Irretrievable breakdown (as it is known in the British legal system) is grounds for divorce.

That's the proposal that's been under discussion for about 5 years now. Under the current law, though, breakdown needs to be demonstrated under one of the criteria I mentioned last time.

Circumcision is sometimes a medically necessary operation
So is amputating an arm. I don't see that practiced on a regular basis, though.

Also, it causes no harm to the patient.
Well, doesn't it? There's a growing body of evidence to suggest that it impairs the sexual performance of both parties.

I'd like to see them legislate against it and then try to enforce it!
I have a suspicion that New Labour New Nanny will try to do it.

Staying topical, Sara
To me, when boys are born, they get circumcised. To Ross, they don't. I'd like our baby (if its a boy) to get circumcised for heatlh reasons - I've read different facts and figures about the number of infections you can get if you don't get it done - not that you will get them, but that its more likely to get infected in that area.

Talk with your doctor about this. Seriously. With proper care, the risk of infection is kept to a very low level. The risk of serious infection is already minuscule. Like I say, have words with the professionals. Make them earn their keep!

Scratch my beard, it's the Wixzard of Salliwoo
Favorite song of the moment: I forget the exact name...but "what can I do you make you love me" or something like that. By the Corrs I think! Ack,I'm useless!

Oh, you mean the Coors, performing "What Can I Do?". Who's useless here? (No, that's not The Last Reference.)

Favorite Girls Name: Alisha
It's those little things that rule the world (:

Kris is
Putting on her Raiders jersey and waiting for Sunday

The words "six" and "ten" spring to mind, for some reason.

Mrs Kenny the Ball quotes her friend in Hythe
"Ooh darlin! Ah've got just the thing for you! Lovely little miracle 'eadache relievin' tablets they are! I'm sure they'll work on your 'orrid old endo! I'll wrap some up and ship 'em to you"!

I never knew they spoke Mockney in Hythe. I always thought it was a more precise, BBC English, voice.

Anna
Favorite cartoon: Southpark and Scooby Doo

On this subject, Scooby Doo, where are you?

Sara again
Who is the DSS, and why do they assume that?

("That" being that cohabiting couples are married).
The DSS is the Department of Social Security, the government ministry responsible for paying out money to the old, ill, out of work and/or poor. They assume it in order not to be seen penalising couples who *do* marry, after there was a small outrage in the early 60s of people getting benefits precisely because they weren't married. Oh, it also cuts down on their bill, but that can't be the reason.

byron again
Those ads are correct. Lolita should have beat out Titanic for best picture.

Ah, but it wasn't eligable for the "Titanic" awards. It will be eligable for next year's awards, and I suspect it'll pick up a few nominations.

Um, can I get on my soapbox a moment? All these lists of things beginning with a given letter... do they have to come to this list? There's enough postings as it is. Thanks.

But speaking of which, the returning shim packs
where's waldo books
wally

Not even adding "where's wally" books? Welcome back, anyway.

Amal
Divorce, by contrast, is a consentual termination of the contract.

Even under the "five years separation regardless of consent" rule? I think not.

Eric
The vows one offers at a wedding may be morally binding, but I don't think they are legally binding.

In which case how would it be possible to prosecute on the grounds of bigamy?

Sara
Or..maybe have it up to the spouse to decide what to do?

I'd go down this route. The adulterererererer (that's enough ER - Bored Of Hospital Dramas Ed) is really not in a position to dictate the pace. If the other partner wants to throw the book at them, that's their choice. But if they think that the relationship will survive better by forgiving and forgetting, that's their call as well.

Lixz
the "man and wife" bit? Certainly seems sexist to me. (you're now a man--a person--but this one's identify is now as a wife.)

Ah, the poetry of the Book of Common Prayer bumps up against Modern Day Realities. And one of them has to give.

Brooks of the run-on phrases
in the case of *criminals* (not necessicaryly adulterereers) they have broken the scocial contract which I feel is implict by continuing to live in any scociety to act according to certian limits

So, let me get this straight. Criminals break a social contract, that much is clear. From that, either you're implying adulterers are criminals for breaking their contract with society in general, and a member in particular. Or you're saying adultery doesn't break that social contract. There's no middle ground.

Lixz
I throw up from **brushing my teeth**

I almost do sometimes, too. Mouth too full of toothpaste, going for that hard-to-reach spot at the top right outside. Not nice.

Betsy
I live like, not even 3 minutes away from my school if I drive.

How far is it to walk? And why aren't you walking: it'll probly be quicker.

These boys are good. OUr frist game is on Saturday. Wish us luck!
Good luck. Hope you do better than Metz!

Iain * keeper of Brian's calendar * icq 14441391
He didn't inhale, and he didn't impale * 12:30 Sunday...


Date: August 26
Subject: listen up

Right, listen hard and listen closely. You could get your poetry published on an international stage, and win great kudos. Or something.

Since Slate's first issue, which included a poem by Seamus Heaney, we have published only poems solicited by our poetry editor, Robert Pinsky. That policy has helped to establish Slate as a place to read and publish poetry. The policy was also a necessity, since we didn't have a way to screen submissions. Now, with a screening system in place, we are pleased to announce that we are accepting submissions of unsolicited poetry.

Now listen closely. Poetry submitted for publication must be sent by snail mail (i.e., stamped paper mail) and accompanied by a self- addressed, stamped envelope. (No e-mail submissions, please.) Manuscripts should have the author's name and address on each page and should be sent to Slate Poetry, 236 Bay State Road, Boston, MA 02215. And don't forget the envelope!

Slate publishes one poem every week. You can read it and also listen to it in the voice of the author (or, if the author is dead, in the voice of Robert Pinsky).

Brum: rain & 17 * no snowflake falls in the wrong place * icq14441391


Date: August 25
Subject: make a spectacle

Anyone else coming to London to meet Eli? Mail me and bag the details.

Clearing up last week's matters. Officer Dibble and Benny the Ball are characters in the Hanna-Barbera animation "Top Cat". Retitled "Boss Cat" in the UK, owing to a commercial product bearing the "Top Cat" moniker.

Shana. Hugs. Big, huggy, tight ones.

Lisa
we got a nice review from The Scotsman.

"Och aye, it were goooood. From yon Sassenachs. But not worth the entrance fee of twenty pence." (;

If we're talking *me*, which I'll have to assume we are, seeing that the world clearly revolves around me
The answers are yes and yes, though maybe not in that order.

I got my A-level grades and I'm going to York (unless I change my mind, which is highly probable.)
For those following the Paxman Ranking of Independent Centres of Knowledge (PRICK) outlined last week, York is an Old, Established university, and ranks below Cambridge but above the redbricks. Tres impressive.

I got 2 and a half As and a B - cool!
Tres impressive squared. I'm just about out-brainboxed here.

What a weird life I lead. Pity me.
I have half a mind to. But 74% of a mind to be envious.

Sara
Okay, I was just about to go lay down and rest for the first time in a long time..and *gasp* read a book instead of being on the computer *grin* But Iain sucked me in

Right. I'll say this right now. If you were about to do something more interesting, like read a book, whittle some wood, or deconstruct the acting in the entirity of "Neighbours", go right now and do it. Don't let me stand in the way of your self- improvement.

Where did the nice sunny days go?? :(
They come in small doses, and have spent most of the rest of the summer in St John's.

But if there is one that is genuine, and down-to-earth, than great!!! I wish we had someone like that...
Hey, paws off, Sir Fatrick's ours. Go find one yourself.

On adultery
I don't think it has anything to do with Jesus, or god, or their teachings...I think it just has to do with what we all know to be right and wrong. Or well...most of us know

Ah, but how do you know it? How are your morals created? From a purely genetic standpoint, monogamy is not necessarily the best option, so where does the moral standpoint that it is right come from? I suspect it's primarily from cultural influences, and they derive straight from the Judaeo-Christian teachings.

LOL...me and Ross were watching Jerry Springer yesterday, and these people...gosh, they were so pathetic.
Can you be more specific? You've covered just about every episode there...

why is that so interesting?
Use your skill, judgement, and a bit of guesswork. And then figure why I'm not badmouthing every target directly.

you couldn't use that excuse to divorce someone - and get more money
Don't remind me of that, thank you very much.

If someone cheats on you, then you have the right to divorce them right away, since they broke their end of the contract.
"But!" shouts a passing lawyer looking to poke her oar in. You have the opportunity to divorce them on grounds of breach of contract. You do not have any obligation to do that. And if you choose not to, then there's precious little that can be done about it.

Sidebar to deal with Sean

Blissfully, irreconcilable differences covers most all.
Not grounds for divorce in England. It's adultery, unreasonable behaviour (a fair standard of proof needed), or two years apart with consent (five without). Plus mandatory one-year cooling off period, and a settlement reached before the divorce is granted.

Back to Sara. Points for marriage

I think thats kinda dumb...it takes out the choice of people.
Well, yes, but so is the DSS's assumption here that a womin and man living under the same roof must be financially entwined, and treated as though married.

What if i wanted to live with Ross, but not marry him..and yet we had kids together, and bought a house together, etc.? well that takes out our free choice to not be married, because we would be 'technically' thought of as being married anyway.
So, you buy a house, run a joint account, have kids, and still refuse to go through a legal / religious service? In the modern society, it appears that marriage isn't so much the certificate as the state of mind. If I come across some couple living in the situation you've outlined, I assume they're married. Full stop. Whatever the legal situation may be. The proposal I outlined last time is an outline attempt at codifing that reality.

Look at Lixs' parents
My parents aren't married, but they've lived together for over 20 years. They usually have to show their joint ownership of our apartment in order to prove, for official purposes, that they are a "couple" (despite, well, me).

They own a property, they have offspring (quality doesn't count for bonus points), and 20 years together. Yet the lack of a scrap of paper causes some hassle in their lives. Utterly insane.

Sara on Reagan
it seems this kind of thing happens with a lot of people - the doctors tell them they will live for only a short while, or they'll die right away, and they go on and on for ages.

Are there statistics to back up your argument, or is this just an innumerate gut feeling?

Althoguh, I thought he had gotten Altzheimer's while in office, but oh well
As I said last time, that is a very improbable situation.

Michael
I wonder what would happened if someone tried to forbid it (circumsision)?

There are groups active in the UK trying to do exactly that to the male operation. So far, they're getting an airing in the liberal press, but are marred by their chief spokesman's obsession with the concept of "going willy-nilly".

Brooks enquires
First, I wonder what it is taht if it comes to britain that you will leave.

The Euro, the Single European Currency. The triumph of political meddling over quarter-baked economics. The attempt to yoke twelve disparate economies into one. It's bound to fail, and I don't want to be around when it does.

people can be coerced to live with a lot of crap.
Two words. Tonyblair Billclinton. (OK, that's four...)

On the Taliban
But I don't know that we can say that it is doomed and will fail (failure being that it is supplanted by a new, more efficent (I am not saying equitable or fair or just or right or nice or crunchy) system.

In which case, by every standard, that regime is in a winning position, as they haven't succeeded yet. In fact, they're so far away that it will take a decade to restore Afghan society to the level it was at when the Taliban insurgency picked up speed.

Mark ponders
the lack of leaf-tea availability in Canada and the US.

Catch flight AC 861 some day, and try to make sure you don't get carried as far as Halif*x. In the Avalon Mall not 30 minutes from the airport is the largest selection of loose teas (and coffees) I've yet seen.

Oh, sorry, you mentioned Canada and the US (:

Brooks presages the Oxford Professor's visits
Just goes to show that Ronnie Reagan was always a bumbling f***ing idiot.

(Yes, I edited it. So shoot me. That's shoot.)

Kristine
Me don't even know where Albania is

I would suggest going to the video store and renting a copy of "Wag the Dog", in which a US President under fire for his sex life invades that far-off country, but events have been overtaken by reality.

Kris~footballdutchess
Predictions for the new season, please. SF or GB for the NFC title? PIT or JAX for the AFC Central? Can anyone stop KC from their charge?

Shobi contributes a long, scholarly, well-thought out analysis. Thank you for taking the time to reply. I only have a few points
such laws are also used to get around Double Jeopardy by punishing people twice for what is essentially the same act.

It appears that they're used to punish people multiply for what is the same act. That is Multiple Jeopardy. Charge them with the lot, make the alternatives available to the jury as appropriate, but only punish on the largest offence. Anything else is stinkingly poor jurisprudence.

Presumably (I�m sure he�ll correct me if I�m wrong) he would also then support laws criminalizing sodomy, prostitution, incest, & fornication.
As something that society wishes to actively discourage, then I see no problem in such laws remaining on the statute book. If a significant minority of society wishes those laws to change, then change the statutes should.

Incidentally, prostitution itself is not illegal in England. But everything else - soliciting, running a brothel, kerb-crawling - is. Go fig.

My bottom line is that if a law is enforced, and a sizable minority sees that enforcement as unjust, they will complain, and ultimately get it changed. The English law on adultery is never enforced, AFAIK. The law on sodomy is only enforced for acts in a public place, which falls outside the private arena Brooks concentrates on. Fornication is also disused. Incest is used, but very rarely. There still seems to be a societal taboo on knowingly commiting incest; the English law needs at least one side to know (or have reasonable suspicion) they're committing incest to prosecute.

Paddock
Read up on f***ing genetics and DNA.

Something that an Oxford don like yourself would know like the back of your hand.

QED
Erm, what is demonstrated, exactly?

Chelle, an interesting biological exposition, which goes to show the dubious ground behind the incest laws. Personally, I don't think it's the biggest battle in the area to fight (16 for gays is more pressing, IMO), but it may come in the future.

If anyone wants to tag me in the ongoing tale, please cc me in personally, else I'll most probably miss it. Thanks.

And finally. Meet me an' Eli in London very soon. Did I mention there would be chocolate involved?

Brum: showers & 19 * icq 14441391 * keeper Brian's calendar


Date: August 23
Subject: the right place

Well, greetings from here. Later, the Back to School Date Debate, what a man thinks, and a half-decent politician. But first, those big human rights issues.

Michael
as long as a victim agrees to be a slave, tortured, or even killed, there's no problem. Nobody and nothing can say "it's not important what you think, I know better what's good for you". Laws should protect people, who _don't agree_ to be treated that way.

Indeed they should. The extension of the legal process into the activities of consenting adults is not the most wonderful of concepts. In fact, it's not something I expect the nation state to do without a very good reason.

Some tribes have _very_ painful initiation rituals, when children are being tortured. Will you forbid them?
It's a hard call, but are they consenting adults? If so, we have no duty interfering into their affairs. If they're not adults, or consenting, then we may wish to express concern.

And how about circumcision? Isn't it a way of mutilation?
Circumcision of eight day old children? Neither consenting nor adults. The female equivalent? Dittoes.

Every human being has it's brain to decide, what's good/bad for his/her body/soul.
It is for the individual to decide. Not the state.

~~Britt

I just found out that school (college) starts on September 1st, which totally and completely SUCKS!!!
Goodness, starting while New Orleans are still in the Super Bowl hunt. That is early. For international comparison, English schools will be going back on or around September 8; Scottish schools went back last week, both after a six week holiday. Colleges return a week later, and university terms kick off circa Sept 20. So expect Huey back then, and maybe a new address for Lisa.

Kris
I have to call about 100 people who were flaked on back in June to see if they are still interested in getting a home loan, then I have to pre qual them, then I have to input and call the interested people back and tell them what they qualify for

Sounds great. [/sarcasm] Something broadly similar at work for me. All the folk in my company are entitled to a laptop to do company business, and as technology advances, they get replaced on a rolling basis. So, one of the guys comes in, expecting a high-powered machine. For whatever reason, he's only been allocated a slightly lower-spec machine, but still miles better than the one he has. But, instead of swallowing some pride and not being so greedy and envious, he flounces off with his old machine in tow. Such avarice. Such a glutton for punishment. Such lust for petty trinkets. And how do I work sloth into that tale?

Sara
Somebody's politics can't be great if they are lying to the public. LOL..tahts why we have no good politicians!!!

Objection from the floor. I put forward the case of Sir Patrick Cormack (Conservative, Staffordshire South). A more genuine, down-to-earth and downright honest politician I know not of. The man just cannot tell it like it isn't, even if that crosses party lines.

Maybe they just live in a country where things happen that they don't like...but they don't want to leave their country. Why should they have to, just to be treated decently?
Oh dear, I'm really showing my age by pointing to Paulo's sigs. Countries are just names and lines on maps. It's people that make the difference.

others are ignorant and don't know that not all culturues/ societies are like that. I can't really say anything, because I've never really lived anywhere like what I'm describing
Can we quote you on that (=:

there are some people that don't know any better, and don't know that they could have a better life, or that they could be happier with a different life.
I will leave the comment here to the reader's imagination.

If they choose to stay in that society/culture after they know what the rest of the world is like (our countries at least)
Sara, a little cultural imperialist? Shome mishtake shurely!

Angela, Oceanraine: hugs and thoughts with you...
Salliwoo: more thoughts, hugs and of you.

On the adultery is (or not) illegal topic, Sara
they *can* come into effect..but not because of the bible. Basically because those things are morally wrong.

Ah-ah, I won't let you have it both ways. Why are these things morally wrong? In what way are they morally wrong? Because the bible, and 4000 years of Judaeo-Christian teaching, say so!

adultery is against the law just by itself, since you are signing into a contract that states that you will be faithful.
Interesting ... very interesting [eyebrow lowering again]

Lixz on marriage contracts
BTW, what specifically goes into a marriage contract? Is there necessarily a "clause" (written or un-) that prevents adultery?

Obligatory Declaration of English Custom and Practice goes here. If the marriage is solomized in a religious context (which, I believe, is restricted to Christian, Jewish, Islamic, Hindu and Sikh faiths), the legal "contract" is deemed to be that contained in the religious ceremony - all of the above prohibit adultery. If it's done in a registry office, there is a stated requirement to not marry anyone else. However, there is still a law from the Interregnum criminalizing adultery; it's never enforced, but it is there.

Of course, there is no tradition of drawing up pre marriage contracts specifying what happens on divorce; such contracts have been rejected by courts until very recently as they might cause one side to petition for divorce before they would without the agreement.

I much prefer to let people make whatever agreements they like and as far as marriage goes, stay out of it. Don't recognize marriages (beyond recognizing long-term/"serious" relationships in terms of benefits like health care), don't make adultery illegal.
An idea floated a year or two ago: establish marriage by points. Living together for some time would establish x points, buying a house or car together gives y points, having children z points, a church service w points. If the points total went beyond a fairly low level (s, say), then the social services might deem the two were cohabiting; if the total went up to s', the pair would be subject to the Messy Divorce Settlement Laws.

And such a system would have the side-effect of being adaptable to couples other than womin-man...

I don't think that [adultery] should be an issue of the law.
Well, maybe it should, maybe it shouldn't. Personally, I see no reason to remove the offence from the statute book, as it signifies society's disapproval of adultery.

On Hillary

It *would* be in her self-interest to divorce him though.
I don't think it would. She would be known as The Ex Mrs Cluntern, and not Hillary Roddham Greatlawyer.

Nichole forwards a piece alleging

Before him, it was Reagan, who left the office with the same Alzheimer's he came in with.
Medical fact: The survival time from first onset of symptoms to death of Altzheimer's patients averages to 5 years, and is rarely above 8. It's now (checks clock) 1998. Reagan left office in (checks history book) 1989. Nine and a half years ago. It seems inconsistent that he had that illness during his time in office, still less that his judgement was significantly impaired by it. But, if the liberals want to re-write the medical books... [/obrush]

government is doing more for less.
Yes, paying for a few people's legal expenses and diddly-squatt for everyone else.

The budget is balanced for the first time since JFK did
But what are you going to do with the surplus, Bill? Finance your looming pensions deficit? Spend some of it? Oh, you're not going to pay off some of the national debt. That's rotten economics. (Search SLATE for further details)

And the stockmarket is higher than a D-student on a full gram of dummy dust,
and about to come down just as hard and fast. Oops, did I mention hard in connection with Bill Cluntern? SMS!

Deca pretends to be a bloke
Me want sex. Me want woman. Me want food. Me want beer. Me want football. Me not talk to woman.

Ah, that's a clever example. The dim ones go: Sex! Food! Sex! Food! Sex!

Oh, stuff it. Sex! Food! Sex! Food! Oh, hi Mr Starr.

...and if you're really lucky you'll find some not representative examples of the male human species whose thoughts are more sophisticated.
We're still here...

Which leads Alan to quote Jeff Stillson
A woman is looking for one man to fulfill all her wants and needs. A man is looking for all women to fulfill his one want and need.

[working light] Ah-ha! It all makes a lot of sense. According to the forgoing, all I'm looking for is intellectual conversation, company, and rank stupidity from 52% of the world.

And more.
bronwyn (who's partner has just fallen fast asleep after sex. isn't that always the way??)

Trust me... no... it's not.

Kris objects to being described as being in a catsuit. I suppose we could fight over this, but I'd sooner settle it with a Weaver Hug. Just, like, beware of my ribs cracking.

Angela
The Chippendales are a form of cheerleading squad. Whenever I've seen them on television they certainly seem to inspire intense (albeit inebriated) team spirit in the women attending...

Yes, but aren't most of the 'dales gay, and the rest are so vain it's easy to confuse them. Ah well.

"Okay, suppose you have two cars crash into each other, what happens?"
They wind up in the same place, and one of the drivers is usually Alex Zanardi. (Why is there no crash magnet in F1 any more?)

On Mark's Scared-Of-Frogs mother, Angela suggests
Play "Froggy Went A Wooing" on the piano to entertain her.

Or, that old Singing Corner classic, "Frog went a-courting, he did ride, ahum, ahum". Just remember to stop before getting to "I Love my Shirt".

You don't even mind if it starts to get some holes in.

Codsall: showers & 17 * where's me jumper? * icq 14441391
keeper of Brian's next month calendar * rockette!


Date: August 21
Subject: play ball

Later, the Great Baseball Match between the All-Starrs and the Clinternites. But first...

Lixz Update
I've decided to chop off like 4 inches of hair and dye the rest dark brown.

Which means that the Official Wrigley Field Wallpaper becomes one more hair style behind actuality. One day, maybe, there will be a fully up-to-the-minute snapshot of The Variably Named One to download. But I'm not holding my breath...

We Want Wrigley Field Wallpaper! if you don't know what I'm wittering about...

Kori
I got to watch Dawson's Creek! :) See, we don't have it here cause the cable company is dumb

The cable company is a cable company. They're paid to be dumb. Just like I pay the BBC, ITV, C4 and (5) not to show Buffy. I do? Last time I buy anything advertised on tv...

Angela's brief "Previously, on List Alive"
Kris has gone berserk in a skintight cat suit

For those of us who have been around the block a little, this is nothing to write home about. Distracting for you newcomers, I suppose...
Shana is looking beautiful as is Liz

This is always true...
Eric is charming

...and this...
Iain is as witty and urbane as ever

...ah well, the facts had to end sometime.

Nichole ponders
can someone PLEASE explain the male mind to me?

And can they fill me in on how it works. Coz I'm supposed to be driving one here, and making a complete hash of Being A Bloke.

Lauren's hair. Short, straight, funky. Who needs pictures when we have imaginations?

Betsy wonders whether to cheer or coach. Ducking under the thrown pom-poms, it takes more nous to coach than cheer. The team can't improve by itself. People can cheer without assistance, as they do at all British soccer grounds. And you'll get to be around the "hot guys" in a far more natural, less forced environment. For all the claims of non-sexism, when were there ever male cheerleaders? Players are male, pom-pom wavers aren't. It's a structured environment, and whoever breaks out of it will have a massive advantage.

Lixz again
To some extent we all must live with the laws of our society because it's impractical to find something better or anything, but I think there is a limit on what people can be forced to live with

For me, it's the Euro. If it comes to Britain, I leave. And you can stick that up your Ikier designer furniture and sit on it, Mr Blah.

Sorry, I'll get off my hobby horse now.

To some extent the Declaration denies cultures the freedom to set themselves up in any way they like; but at the same time they give freedom to the people within those cultures that I think is MORE fundamental and MORE important.
The argument you're putting forward boils down to the rights of the individual against the betterment of the whole. The example of Taliban Afghanistan is valid, but it's clear that by disbarring 53% of their population from doing anything, the society is not making best use of its resources, and will fail. Is there an example of a society that actually advances further by limiting the rights of its citizens? War-time Britain springs to mind, for some reason.

Huey, Laura K, or Brem, or know when Shim's gonna be back or if she is already?
Brem has departed these shores, and was most recently spotted posting to the Kenickie list. Huey is taking a summer vacation; I anticipate his return in a month or so. Krantz was last sighted on a now-defunct list, and Maaaaaark's informed us where shim is.

Site 3 in the World Web Tour takes us around Manitoba. It has the obligatory news links, though yesterday their Flytrap coverage was primarily reader reaction, not wire reports. Arts, sports and "community" coverage, and a chance to win Cowboy Junkies tickets and goodies.

Sara
I don't like ketchup in general...or lettuce, tomatoes, onions...

Please remember than man cannot live by Reese's alone. Though Sara's bally well going to have a shot. (:

I don't think she should need to join the list to send something.
Ah-ha! This looks like our point of difference.

I really don't see how anything the church does or says has to do with laws for a nation.
In the way modern England is structured, 26 bishops have a vote in the House of Lords. Yes, it's an unelected chamber. Yes, it doesn't conform to the Liberal Democratic (read: American) ideal. But when there's a government as arrogant and self-obsessed as the Blah administration, they help play a valuable role in revising ill thought out measures.

I DO think that they should have our western liberal values.
A point Brem was rather fond of: just because a certain way of thinking is dominant at the moment doesn't mean it's there forever, or that it's right.

the bible should not be used to make laws. Not at all...
In which case stealing is allowed. As is coveting your neighbour's ass. And adultery is fine. So's murder. Each of those are specifically prohibited in one book of the bible (you may have heard of it...) but if the bible's not to be used to make laws, then these prohibitions can't come into effect.

Stealing - coveting asses - adultery - murder. It's the Bill Cluntern Base Balls Section!

Sara is the lead-off hitter for the All Starrs
we all already knew he's slept with Monica Lewinsky

I think there's a "d" after the "w".

I can't believe that 65 percent of people thought his explanation was reasonable.
Well, he may have spoken accurately at that time. But given his previous record, how can we possibly tell?

he cheated on his wife - and so many times!!
Gennifer Flowers. Paula Jones. Kathleen Willey. Monica L. And what was with all the jogging sessions in the height of summer?

If he can't even stay faithful to his wife, then why kind of president could he possibly be?
One that (er) cheats on his wife [/obobvious]

I can't understand how people can still believe in and like Clinton, when he has cheated on his wife and family.
Liar, cheat, sneak, adulterer. How many of the ten commandments - his god's ten commandments - is that he's snapped?

Not that Hillary is any better...oh, I'm going to divorce my husband, but not until after hes not president anymore...
I think you may be doing Rodders a bit of a dis-service there. She's a very astute person, and it wouldn't be in her self-interest to divorce him. Though if he asks for one...

it has nothing to do with other countries - basically they don't even come into it.
The benefits of hindsight [sigh]...

he *is* an ordinary man in the street.
No he's not. Ordinary Man In The Street doesn't get to take off the piss-poor summer programming by making a public statement OMITS doesn't have a detachment of crack soldiers around him, ready to rush straight to him if it needs to happen. Shame, really.

my opinion of people that cheat on their wives/husbands is the lowest of the low.
Interesting... [/raised eyebrow]

If he can't even keep his vows to his marriage, then what *can* he keep?
Good question.

Nichole plays at shortstop
Kings and Queens wouldn't be going thru all this I guess

Two words. Prince Charles.

Deca bunts
If he hops into bed with other women then that's his problem/ pleasure and that of his wife respectively.

Insofar as that's all he's done, that would be true. However, there are allegations that Clintern had incited people to lie, fib and otherwise mislead in the Whitewater and Jones cases, then in Travelgate, Filegate, the Democrat spending round, the cover-up, the cover-up of the cover-up, and the alleged cover-up of the cover-up of the cover-up of the alleged cover-up.
[re-reads above]
Yeah, that. So, basically, this just fits into a pattern of lying, fibbing and generally misleading people.

It all would've been just a little anecdote if he had simply admitted it in the first place and so it wouldn't have turned into a question about whether he forced other people to lie for him or not.
Ah, but then it would only have reduced Starr's job to investigating the cover-up of (oh, work it out for yourself!)

Trying to break Roger Maris' record in one series, Lixz
Personal decisions Clinton makes should only be evaluated politically in terms of what actions they are LIKELY to make him take politically, and that's not enough to kick someone out of office.

But if those actions would bring the office of president into disrepute - as may be the case here already - should he stay and irreperably damage those who follow him? Cite Nixon for the "go!" camp.

Sara hits into an infield fly for the All Starrs
I'm on the right track..especially if we link this case directly to Bill clinton, and not use it on people in general.

But you just can't do that! If you use it for president X, then president X+5 (roughly) will be the next slightly sleazy character to hold the office, and the precedent will be entrenched. Similarly if the standard applies for the President today, it'll be Congress members next year, state Senators the year after that, dog catchers later, and it'll trickle down to everyone.

I would like someone that actually honors the vows that they take
Would those be marriage vows or vows of office?

Under the bleachers runs a Brooks. Hey, this is Three Rivers...
rather than this lets try to do something useful like reduce poverty or provide good, affordable health care.

Hey, why bring politics in now, just when we're enjoying it? Seriously, though, wasn't Cluntern elected in '92 on a platform rather like this (and stop the ban on gays in the military...)

Sara comes to bat again
as for the presidents that I know about, ALL of them had cheated on their wives.

There is no better argument for making sure all presidents are womyn. Most of them wouldn't cheat on their wives.

No doubt this battle will continue, but we're right out of time for this epic match here on (5). Now to our regularly scheduled programming, and a repeat of yesterday's Cheapo Quiz Show.

Brum: cloudy & 20 * Next stop for the battlebus: Torquay
keeper of Brian's calendar for next month * icq 14441391 * rockette


Date: August 20
Subject: Flytrap

Well, I seem to have started a bit of a firestorm with my comments (yesterday) on Flytrap, the scandal engulfing President Clintern. David Plotz, the wonderfully named political editor of SLATE magazine, gives us 21 points to ponder...

President Clinton has left for vacation and the American people may or may not be "moving on," but Flytrap surely remains. The Speech may have guaranteed Clinton's survival, but it won't prevent more testimony by Monica and Linda, a possible presidential subpoena, a tough report by Starr, and congressional impeachment hearings. So, before Slate heads off on a short vacation of its own, I propose a Flytrap midterm: 20 questions to help keep you busy during the August scandal doldrums. Plenty of mysteries about Flytrap remain. Here's your chance to guess their solutions. In this test, as in the SAT, you won't know the results for months. Plotz's suggested answers are the ones indicated in bold.

  1. What did Hillary really know, and when did she know it?
    1. Nothing until he told her this weekend. She truly believed him.
    2. Suspicions all along but no certainty till this weekend.
    3. Everything as soon as the scandal broke in January.
    4. Everything even before the scandal broke.
  2. Starr watchers insist he's building a much stronger case against Clinton than a simple sex/perjury allegation. So what is Starr hiding up his sleeve?
    1. Evidence of obstruction of justice involving the Lewinsky gifts and job offers.
    2. Evidence of suborning perjury involving the "Talking Points." (See Question 5.)
    3. Evidence of suborning perjury in the Kathleen Willey matter.
    4. Lots more nasty details about Clinton's sex life.
    5. Some or all of the above.
    6. Something else altogether.
  3. Clinton may have denied that he committed perjury in the Jones deposition, because he believes what he did with Lewinsky did not technically violate the definition of "sexual relations. Well, what did Clinton and Lewinsky actually do?
    1. Oral sex for him, nothing for her; perhaps skirting the Jones definition.
    2. Mutual masturbation, skirting the Jones definition.
    3. Oral sex for both, clearly violating the Jones definition.
    4. Any other alternative, undoubtedly too icky to be discussed here but clearly violating the Jones definition.
  4. What was one, just one, of the questions that Clinton refused to answer?
    Insert your extremely graphic question here.
  5. Who really wrote the Talking Points?
    1. Monica. We mean it.
    2. Bill Clinton, dictated to Monica.
    3. Bruce Lindsey, dictated to Monica.
    4. Linda Tripp.
    5. A handsome, mysterious stranger.
  6. Why wasn't Clinton more contrite and less aggressive during The Speech?
    1. Hillary urged him to fight back, not roll over.
    2. He knew Starr wouldn't care how apologetic he was, so he decided to take the offensive and win the PR war.
    3. He isn't sorry and doesn't think he lied.
    4. All of the above.
  7. Who made the first move, Monica or Bill?
    1. Monica.
    2. Bill.
  8. Will Hillary stick with Bill or ditch him like a hot potato as soon as he is out of office?
    1. Stick.
    2. Ditch.
  9. How low must Clinton's approval ratings sink before Republicans pursue impeachment?
    1. 70 percent.
    2. 60 percent.
    3. 50 percent.
    4. 40 percent.
    5. How can you be so cynical? His poll numbers are irrelevant. They will impeach him if he has committed impeachable offenses, no matter how popular he is.
  10. Will the Lewinsky tapes ever be released? If so, will they destroy Clinton's reputation?
    1. Yes, yes (because they're so much worse than we imagine).
    2. Yes, no (because we have already imagined the worst).
    3. Yes, no (because Monica will sound too flaky to take seriously).
    4. No, no.
  11. Did Clinton's aides really believe his denials? If yes, why? If no, why didn't they quit?
    1. No, they really didn't think it mattered.
    2. No, they didn't want to embarrass the administration.
    3. Yes, they trusted him absolutely.
    4. Yes, they never asked.
    5. Yes, they were willfully delusional.
  12. With whom did Clinton plot cover stories to cover up the Lewinsky affair?
    1. With Betty Currie about the gifts and Monica's visits.
    2. With Monica about everything.
    3. With Bruce Lindsey about everything.
    4. With Vernon Jordan about getting her a job.
    5. Any combination of the above.
  13. What is Bruce Lindsey's role in all this?
    1. Knew about affair, did nothing to help or hinder it.
    2. Knew about affair, helped hide it from Hillary and outsiders in harmless ways.
    3. Knew about affair, helped clean it up in questionable ways (Talking Points, etc.).
    4. Innocent bystander.
  14. Will Starr subpoena the president?
    1. No, Starr got enough on Monday to nail him.
    2. No, Starr doesn't want to risk constitutional crisis.
    3. Yes, Clinton ducked too many important questions.
    4. Yes, just to annoy Clinton.
  15. Starr is probably constitutionally barred from indicting the president. Whom will he indict in the Lewinsky matter?
    1. Bruce Lindsey.
    2. Vernon Jordan.
    3. Betty Currie.
    4. Bill Richardson.
    5. William Ginsburg, just for the hell of it.
    6. None of the above.
  16. Clinton knew that Monica Lewinsky and Kathleen Willey were out there. So why didn't he settle the Paula Jones lawsuit rather than risk exposure?
    1. Paula Jones was actually lying, and Clinton refused to cave to her blackmail.
    2. Clinton assumed they would never find Willey and Lewinsky.
    3. Clinton assumed they would find Willey and Lewinsky but also assumed Willey and Lewinsky would stay silent, because his women usually do.
    4. Clinton is a fool.
  17. The Supreme Court permitted the Jones suit in part because it would not distract the president from his job. Would the justices have let the Jones suit proceed if they had known it would produce the Flytrap circus?
    1. Yes.
    2. No.
  18. Does Clinton really believe oral sex is not adultery?
    1. Yes.
    2. No.
    3. "Well, it's complicated ..."
  19. According to some reports, only 40 percent of Tripp's testimony was about Flytrap. So what was the rest about?
    1. Vince Foster's death.
    2. Kathleen Willey.
    3. Threats by White House staffers against Tripp.
    4. Her secret tapes of other "friends" talking about their sex lives.
  20. What gifts did Monica give Clinton?
    1. The gold-and-navy tie on the front page of today's New York Times.
    2. The blue tie he wore during The Speech.
    3. A jack-o'-lantern pin.
    4. A copy of Vox.
    5. Sexually suggestive tapes.
    6. All of the above.
    And, for extra credit:
  21. What's on that dress, anyway?
    1. Semen.
    2. Toothpaste.
    3. Laundry detergent.
    4. Lemon-swirl yogurt.
    5. Nothing.

Brum: cloudy & 20 * keeper of Brian's differently accurate calendar
England set SL 257 to win * Rockette!


Date: August 19
Subject: hatchoo

From the Cold (as in flu) Capital of Britain, this is a sneezy, coughy writing.

Well, two years of Bronwyn. How did we ever manage without her? Gee, it's so long ago I've forgotten, and don't really want to remember. Yes, rising stars of the firmament.

And two years of shim. Two words. Glitter.

Angela
As we're so close to Windsor, Canada (about 45 minutes actually) we do get The Bill but not whatever you were referring to.

Anyone else care to enlighten Angela about the origin of Benny the Ball and Officer Dibble? I'll do it myself if no-one else does. It's not something produced in Britain, no sir.

Life's ambitions. Hmm. To get out of Britain; regular listies know the rest. To be happy and/or rich. To be a passable radio presenter.

Now, in order to turn a 13K post down to a 7K one, I've snipped out my commentary on the human rights charter. It will be posted to my website over the weekend.

Sara
I did not write it, so therefore I am not responsible for it.

Rubbish. You forwarded it to the list. If you don't want to take responsibility for it, don't forward it. There's no reason for the original poster not to join the list and post it herself. As Sara is forwarding the posts to the list, Sara's name appears at the top of the post, and I'm accurate in quoting from a Sara post.

it is the *people* being treated different *because of* the acts they choose to perform
My point exactly. People do things, and are treated differently because of that.

The moral judgement might fall outside of the article, but what they do because of the moral judgement doesn't.
Nay, nay and thrice nay. The original article states that all human beings are born free and equal in dignity and rights. There's no mention of moral judgements in there.

Sex between two boys, sex between two girls, sex between a guy and a girl, is all fundamentally the same. It's all sex.
There are obvious physical differences; no-one can deny that. Whether this constitutes not making them fundamentally the same is a moral call, one that a rights charter is really not in a position to touch.

Whether some people think it is 'morally' wrong to have sex with someone of the same sex, the laws should not go on that moral judgement. They should go on human rights, and the right that people have to do what they want with regards to sex.
Erm, why should laws not go on moral judgements? Why should a strict reading (or misreading: you go fig) of the Bible not be used to base laws in a clearly Christian society such as England? Don't bring up the separation of Church and State; that's an American phenomenon, not an English one.

Not that I'm defending it in any way, mind. And, yes, I am very jealous of Canada's enlightened attitude. However, it's my view that the stick in the mud attitude is not an intrinsic breach of this article.

And on to Lixz
I don't understand your point that as the declaration is universal it cannot deal with moral issues--that's precisely what it does, in an attempt to establish limits on what is ever morally acceptable.

But how can such a declaration possibly do that in a morally and culturally neutral manner? From where I'm sitting, it feels like an attempt to force Western liberal values onto the whole world. Ultimately, this is a matter for each individual culture to set its own boundaries.

Furhtermore, I think it certainly is an issue of equality because it's against the most very basic nature of equality to impose arbitrary rules that affect certain groups in the population more than others.
My point is that this is not a good example of a breach of Article 1. Nothing more, nothing less. That article can logically pertain only to the rights contained in the Declaration; so far, I've not seen anything to assert or otherwise the equality of gays.

When one opens a can of worms, they go everywhere.

Deca enquires
Where *is* Mrs Bing??

Good question. I think she'll be posting later in the week, to report her A-level grades. Hope she beat mine. In the one way she can.

And maybe she could clear up the confusion about how to adress her properly? Mrs Bing? Mrs Forrest-Bing? Or him as Mr Forrest? Or how about Forring? Or Brest?
I'll stick with The Lovely Lisa.

Mark ponders the Great Fascist Quiz Show Hosts Of Our Time
Paxman's demoralising attitude/behaviour towards the toffee-nosed kids that frequent University challenge is far more in line to Parsons' own condescension to good 'ole British housewives in the 1980s.
Will that do, Iain?

Yee-ee-ee-ee-eees. Though Mark's analysis neglects to mention that Paxman often appears to favour competing sides in this pecking order:

Is this further evidence of his fascism, or just blatant left-wing bias?

~ Question or Nominate? ~
Question please, Bill.

New on the UK Album Charts this week at #17: "Saturday Night Fever" by the Original London Cast. Someone will have something to say on that...

Angela brings up winning stuff on the web. I've won a Pepsi Pack, from the sponsors of the Network Chart; and a Billboard hits CD for knowing a lot about the EuroSong contest.

Am I the only person who would be totally stunned if Big Bill actually confessed to ANYTHING today?
Well, he did, you know. After the leaks that have been coming out over the previous days, the world had been softened up for some sort of revalation like this maybe a culpa.

"This matter is between me... my wife and our daughter and our God" appeals to the Good Churchgoing Folk of America. Heck, if you're going to confess trouser-dropping, why not embrace religion as well as other things.

His gropings were "not appropriate". Not dirty, not disgraceful, surely not sinful, wrong or criminal. Just not appropriate.

And he answered questions "no American citizen would ever want to answer". With the combined slurs that a) non-Americans would be happy to answer these questions, and b) he's an ordinary man in the street. Surrounded by secret service agents, with the nuclear football that could wipe out the entire planet before the top of the hour to hand.

Am I the only one who thinks they'll have to drag him bodily out of office kicking and screaming and hanging onto the furniture?
We know he's a liar and a cheat. The questions are now:
1) Did he commit perjury in the Paula Jones case - under the definition of "sexual relations" there, that boils down to did he and Monica umm?
2) Did he cause other people to commit perjury?
If not, he stays. If he did, then He Has To Go. At this point in time, I think it's only fair to give Bill the benefit of the doubt, and say he's innocent unless we hear otherwise. There is, of course, one further point:

3) Does all this make him unfit to hold the President's office?

The next American Presidential election will take place on November 7, 2000. Mid-term elections are held this November 3.

Codsall: sunny & 23 * radio show held till I'm better
keeper of brian's wonky calendar * Cantona beats Cantona


Date: August 16
Subject: east wittering

Good news for the St John's Connexion, as the lost city of Atlantis stays resolutely beneath the waves, and volcanoes in the Atlantic stubbornly refuse to erupt. Nadine McNamara claims a 99% success rate. Is that 99% correct..?

Now, Angela asked Sara
how on earth did you land in England?

And Sara told her story. Now, I'm briefly going to pretend to be Mr Lisa Forrest, and give the smart-Chandler answer. She landed at Heathrow airport on a flight from the USA.

Still being Chandler Forrest on Any Questions, Deca asks
how do you correctly quote dialogue from a film?

Write down exactly what you hear, and do say which flick it's from.

Now, a day or two ago Mark remarked that he's grotesquely self- critical of just about everything he does. I must be the 93rd person on the list to concur with that. Even though on my next weaver.radio broadcast (available on a real audio player near you tomorrow) you'll be able to hear me doing my best Fluff Freeman / Mark Goodiebags impression. I think my voice sounds weak and whiney, and my presentation is crap. Someone, tell me I'm wrong.

And on to Sara's web design
On the top is my banner, on the left side are links to my other pages, and in the middle is just well...stuff.

Hmm. You want more room? Put the banner at the bottom: even if its the same size, it'll feel the main frame has more space. And perhaps use a map based around one large graphic rather than individual links. Yeah, image maps are tricky, but it's a one-time thing.

Sara may not have written it, but she forwarded it to the list and so takes responsibility for it. We're going to hear 30 quotes from a political campaigning organisation wishing to forward their aims. Do please allow me to play Devil's Advocate a little, putting forward counter-arguments - sometimes with the intention that you'll accept them, but more often that they'll help you think about the issues.

"All human beings are born free and equal in dignity and rights"
You have the same rights as everyone else in the world, because you are a human being. These rights are inalienable - they cannot be taken away from you. Every individual, no matter who they are or where they live, should be treated with dignity.

So what is the concurrent responsibility to go with that right? Because every right is dependent on a responsibility, otherwise that right is meaningless. As I see it, the responsibility is to act in a manner that gives these basic human rights and respects to all other people. And no matter what, they're entitled to be not shot at, enslaved, mutilated or otherwise abused.

The age of consent for gay men is 2 years higher than it is for consenting heteros.
Ah, this is true but it's such of a red herring. It is not the people that are being treated differently, but the acts they choose to perform. At a biological level, the acts are fundamentally different. As the items in this declaration are meant to be universal, they must not impinge on moral judgements, as this would break their universality. So, the moral judgement falls slap outside the scope of this article.

A black man coming home from the pub, drunk but peaceful, will encounter police harrassment, whereas a white middle class girl can lie screaming in the road and they won't bother her.
Based, I note, on a random sample of one and stereotypical behaviour. Neither of which are firm grounds on which to hold people liable.

Angela
The air in Detroit tonight smells like someone is freebasing damp radioactive squirrels.

The air in Codsall tonight smells of moist soil and settling dew.

Jenn
Don't get me wrong, I'm looking forward to all this starting a new life stuff, but its all so hard. I worked so hard for this life, and though I know I'm not giving it up, I am changing irrevocably...

One door closes, another one opens. Be brave, be clever, and above all be yourself. Thinking of you in your new home (psst... where is said new home?)

Angela starts
a "My Favorite How Many" joke list?

Well, this isn't so much a joke per se as something amusing. How many copies of Windows 98 do you have to fire up to be sure of getting the correct date tomorrow?
Surprisingly, the answer is five. About 20% of the UK versions of Bill Gates' new O$ come with a bug that doesn't allow them to move from one day to the next. Instead, time travels backwards for them. It's probably the result of a bit of code put in by someone who really doesn't like "Torn", and thinks the quickest way to stop hearing it is to go back in time to before it was ever recorded. And they're probably right...

Sara requests
(Please vote after Noon Eastern Time each day..thanks!!)

Which is 13:30 NFT, 16h UTC, (oh, you know the drill). But can those of us in the Far East always vote before 5 o'clock (or whatever)?

So, with all this talk of Reese's (thanks, Jill), I popped into Woolies yesterday (cheers, Sara) to find some of these delicacies and evaluate them for myself. Only, the assistants in there were somewhat less help than a passing chocolate teapot, and didn't have a clue about what I was talking about. This is nothing unusual, I might add, but didn't really help me out much.

Jennifer wonders
Is it REALLY better to have loved and lost than to have never loved at all??

One the one hand, yes; on the other, no. It's your own call. Personally, I'm leaning towards the latter camp right now, but ask me in a day or two and my answer will probably be different.

Mark
Hmm, Mark wonders whether to have a chocolate or straaaawberry milkshake.... brb I need to consult with the Frog Orchestra!

And the result was..? Strawberry, if I have anything to do with it.

I can only remember four of the characters... Bod, Farmer Barleymow, Aunt Flo and the conductor of the Frog Orchestra... my memory fails me... I am not worthy
One of the advantages of having crap shops in Wolverhampton is that they sometimes sell off things they shouldn't. I got my copy of Dario G's album two weeks before the release date, just by waltzing into a store and picking it up off the display. And I got a Bod video, which reminds me that you forgot Frank the Postman and PC Copper.

So, to a well-known movie emporium to see "Lost in Space". Well, I figure that if it's a choice between spending all afternoon talking with the aunt and uncle, or taking their offspring to the flicks, there's no choice. And given the small range of good movies that a 9-year-old is allowed to see, the Joey an' Claudia flick won the day. And a rather good flick it is, although utterly predictable in a "you know Lacey's going to get, like, zip screen time, and there's no plot, but it's better than the world's most boring relatives" way. No, that's unfair. I'd watch it when it comes to tv. And it's more interesting than dull relatives.

William G Stewart is the funniest impression of a fascist dictator on British tv screens at present. Discuss. (This is your cue, Mark, shim, Lisa, Sara..?)

And after the break, the three remaining viewpoints will fight it out over the last 40 questions.

Codsall: cloudy & 19 * icq 14441391 * ... and we're asked to bat
keeper of half-empty crimson glow bottle


Date: August 14
Subject: howardine

Bad news for the entire St John's Connexion, if Nadine McNamara is to be trusted. She's a psychic in Pictou, Nova Scotia, and she's predicted that volcanoes will erupt in the Atlantic and in the Bermuda Triangle, causing colliding tsunami (tsunamis? Is there a seismologist who can put me right..?) which won't be helped by the rising of the lost continent of Atlantis. Oh, and all this is due to happen this coming Saturday, the 15th.

A seismologist writes: Don't be daft, McNamara. There are few plate stresses in the North Atlantic. They're mainly concentrated in California, and on the Med. Oh, and it's tsunami.

The Proof Is In The Pudding! It's another outbreak of Olde Englysh; in this case "proof" means "test". The lord's chef would "prove" the pudding (which could easily be a pie) by eating it, in order to show that it wasn't poisoned and was well cooked.

Angela speaks of
Officer Ball

Hang on a moment, I thought it was Officer Dibble and Benny the Ball. Or, in this case, I suppose Kenny the Ball.

And, apparently,
There's NO wrong way to eat a Reeses

Call me Johnny Foreigner, but I have no idea what one of these Reeses is, still less where to put the apostrophe. Would someone care to enlighten?

Bronwyn remembers...
i personally don't believe that you have to wait til marriage or even love if you don't want to. but what matters is what *you* want.

I'm only going to disagree with half of the above, and it's the first half. So far as I'm concerned, love is vital; some form of public committment is also required. Don't expect to get me into bed and keep it quiet. I don't work that way, coz it doesn't make me happy.

i hate it that other people bully, chastise or pressure each other in regards to this.
Indeed, this is a significantly Bad Thing.

MSCL Is SO Crappy Today BECAUSE:
The show's not on.

Angela on veggie burgers. British veggies - heck, all Brits - may wish to try McDougal's veggie burgers, assuming they don't have something against the store. They're not spicy, and do have a very agreeable dressing.

Andi
send me $79.98 per episode, i'll send you a tape with the episodes you want

Andi, you cheapskate! Shurely you mean $79.98 per quarter episode, plus surtax, generalsalestax, valueaddedtax, incometax, tintax and capitalgainstax.

Anna mentioned
Aunt Flo

And there I was, thinking that this was going to turn into a discussion of that classic kids' tv show, "Bod". Sadly not. Not even a mention of the yellow-dressed one. Nor even Farmer Barleymow. ):

Kris's brief commentary on the world of kick boxing:
dong quai kicks ass

This week's Place To Visit: Pacific Harbor. The place to go for people interested in the North West USA, especially the Washington sea-board. You know, the place where there are masses and masses of punctuation forests. Little yellow quotation marks hanging off their vines. Colons and commas, and their odd offspring, the semicolon. Dashes - they actually grow vertically, you know, and it's a whole industry just getting them to lie flat. The common full stop. And, of course, the Berg family's massive plantation of exclamation marks. No wonder Skeie!!!! uses so many. She gets them free!

Chelle
i'm on central daylight savings time

90 minutes ahead of South Park, 150 behind Newfoundland. See my archives for the rest of the equivalances.

Britt points out that FIENDS is doomed, as Buffy would come along and slay everyone. No, that's not quite true. Priestess Cory would come along and slay everyone with her bouncing orange ball.

Lauren recalls the time
when everyone (the girls) used to have those huge button pictures of them (mostly Joe) on their desks in Mr. Hanson's class.

Nowadays, I suppose all the girls would have these huge buttons of Taylor on their desks in Mr Newkidontheblock's class. Plus ca change...

Lixz
At CTY I went to the BEST activity! It was billed as NKOTB Apprciation...but it turned out to be NKOTB **and** Vanilla Ice! We listened to music and colored in pictures of the singers while sitting on NKOTB sheets (after we'd admired one RA's Vanialla Ice swimsuit, of course) and then we all did the Right Stuff dance... so much fun!!

Well, yes, but this is meant to be the Centre for Talented Youth. Rather than the Centre for Appreciation of Semi-Talented Youths Of Ten Years Ago.

Gee, you know you're getting old when people start reminiscing about the bands you didn't care much for. Which means, I guess, I'm fine till people get nostalgic for Oasis.

Angela asks
England! Please wave hi to my darling friend who lives in Hythe!

Hello, Angela's friend in Hythe. For Sara's benefit, Hythe is one of the small ports on the Kent coast, right opposite France. It's a real old town, one of the Cinque Ports, and rather nice.

Talk of the devil... Sara
I really don't like the word LOO

Me neither. "Toilet" sounds far nicer. Or "Little Scientist's Room" (or whatever's appropriate). But loo, yuck. There are Public Loos, and there are Conveniences. Public loos smell.

I LOVE the word petrol
Yes, it does have a nicer ring than "gas". Of course, petroleum is too much of a mouthful for anyone to say... Bet you don't love the prices, though. It's about 65p per litre here: over in Fredricton NB, it's 60 cents (25p).

Lauren again
Do I care what anyone else thinks? Not really.

Bully for you! Sounds like you've got a bit of a keeper there...

And I'll darken your mailboxes again Sunday.

Brum: showers & 20 * keeper of a half-empty bottle of crimson glow
icq 14441391 * and of brian's next month calendar * rockette!


Date: August 11
Subject: uberheated

And welcome to you. Especially if you have a large flask of iced tea to send over.

Candy, welcome aboard. I referred just last week to Mae being the only sensible poster from South East Asia. Glad to find there's another one out there.

Christina: discussing the rights and wrongs of an individual situation isn't going to help in the long run. On a more general level, I'm certain that there will be something that makes your parents treat you as an independent adult. It may not be the best move to force that moment, as that would be counterproductive. And do remember that we think a lot of you.

Though this passage deserves comment
my faith and morals go beyond my hormones.

[huge applause] [hysterical cheers] [massive clapping]
Well said, ma'am.

She said last night "well if you are going to get physical i want you on the pill"
The pill is a good contraceptive. The word "No" is a far more effective one.

we left and went to the mall and i bought some hair mascara
Purple glitter is the cure to all known ills (A. Cutler, 12/28/97). Especially pointing out to other guys that the wearer Is Taken.

Deca
This mail was written in a state of complete soberness.

A grammarian writes: Deca, do you not remember Tanita Tikaram's brief brush with fame 10 years ago? Just about the only hit she ever had? Good old "Twist in my Sobriety". That is an example of an excellent English word to describe not being drunk. I wrote this mail in a state of total sobriety.

Hic.

Absholutely.

Also happening: Channel 5's fab "Pitch, Hit & Run" continues its tour, this week visiting "Sunny Birmingham" - presenter Eddie... Yes, Sara, this has been the British summer. It's all over soon (not soon enough, if you ask me); with the bizarre weather we've been having these last few years, the next summer will be 5-10 January next year. Book your suncream for then...
And the "Bob and Carol and Ted and Alice" answer from two weeks ago:
Bob: to move in small up and down movements.
Carol: a celebratory song.
Ted: to spread, especially of manure. (Common in 15th cent. English)
Alice: to hit weakly. (Golfing slang)

Ashley on "Ever After"
it didn't beat out R+J on my list

I don't know, I seem to be going through a bit of an R+J kick at the moment. "Front Row" tonight was discussing the new Avengers movie, and pointing out that just about every movie of the past few years started big and then fell quickly. The only exceptions I could think of were "Four Weddings", "The Full Monty" and "Romeo + Juliet".

And I was a bit bored last week, and ran "Claire Danes" through SLATE's compost. She's been mentioned four times; briefly in connection with Les Mis and the Rainmaker, as one of Leo's exs, and with R+J - with a link to an AVI of the first meeting from the film.

Now, I recognised a lot of names in an offlist mail from Kristi. I'm sure she won't mind my pointing out that it was a hoax purporting to be an offer from Bill the Bubble Guy Gates to give every recipient of the mail $1000 and a copy of Windoze 98. What I find more interesting is the places this mail has been. In reverse chronological order, I spot Peterborough, Ontario. New York. Boston, Mass. Aloha, Oregon. Then, rather bizarrely, an early report from San Fransisco, and the ultimate trace back to the head offices of The Globe And Mail, that well known national Canadian paper. The self-same one that's trying to fight off competition from Conrad Black's forthcoming national. If this is their tactic, I'm pushing my loonie behind the Blackster.

And look who's back!
Elizabeth Angellla-Brem Skeie-Leih Sparkle-Crayola Innes Wrigley-Field

Little Miss Name's Too Long To Fit Onto One Line! Yay!!

Catchalater...

Brum: hot, sun & 26 * England In Test Series Win Shock!
icq: 14441391 * Rockette! * Dipsy of #1 place


Date: August 9
Subject: Silly Post Warning

Even by my standards, this is a mad post. Don't say you weren't warned. Later: costly ISPs, Sarah McLachlan, Private Eye and bad translations. But first, a quick word from the news desk.

In Washington, leaders are debating the future of the clear world. In Birmingham, NATO ministers are gathering to talk about protecting Western Europe from revolutionary flying beetles. But wait! They've stopped debating that, and are talking on other matters

Angela's joke.
A joke: What's cold, white, and cowardly?
A: Chicken salad

The combined brains of Oxford, Cambridge and London Universities are hard at work, decoding that joke for the groups in Washington and Sunny Birmingham.

While they're working out that, I'll discuss other matters.

Nichole points out
some people do not live in the US [gasp][shock]

This is true. Some of us acknowledge that there are Other Nations than the US. A few of us freaks actually prefer these foreign countries.
and they have to pay ALL calls to their ISP and/or for indivudual emails (or by size of things they d/l in general) no matter what server they use.

Indeed. The standard in the UK is: either a flat fee of around 20 pounds per month or 5 pounds for 10 hours plus 1 pound for each extra hour. (1 pound is roughly $1.60.) Plus telecoms charges of 1p per minute at weekends, up to 2p per min during the day.

Now, 10 5K mails at a 28800 modem will take around 20 seconds to download. That would cost around 2p.

This same argument is the reason why I really dislike spam mails. They are a direct cost-shift to the consumer. Me.

Now, back at the Birmingham NATO conference, the Spanish delegate is addressing the conference. Translations from the resident translator, K Stone.
i own very much ranches with many acres. I have the best water, I would like your permission to marry your daughter Mr. Severino My teeth are real, I have a nice car, but I do wear contacts.

More from them later.

Linette begs the question
The address we write to is owned by the admis. The list is not.

So, who does own the list?

In Salzburg, the EU summit debates what "the truth" is. According to the official communique, just being passed to me, The Truth is one of about 30 small calcium deposits found in the mouth.

Priestess Cory, the Laa-Laa of the Desert, sparks yet another round of international heads of state meeting
Food or Bondage?

Depends who with. Oh, you mean what food's to be used. Hmm, well, there are uses for ice cubes, and grapes, and tight dresses...

Deca gives me credit for
Shome mishtake shurely (obIain)

In fairness, this is one of my most blatant steals from the fortnightly satire magazine "Private Eye". British readers are cordially invited to part with 1 Pound for a copy. Foreign readers are cordially invited to journey to Birmingham and purchase a copy of their very own. And if they don't tell me they're coming, they won't have to meet me. An excellent result for everyone.

Quickly back to the conferences. In Birmingham, a response from the Turkish delegate:

"Never in the course of human history has so much been owed by so many to so few. Will someone please vote for us at next Eurosong!"
Back at the EU HOG, they're debating whose faces should appear on the Euro coins. A flushing toilet is the favourite motif, for some odd reason. And in Washington, events have been side-tracked by a suggestion that they're dealing with a sweet transvestite from Arkansas.

Sara
police do crap for anyone...I don't know about the police around here

Then do you mind not passing such a slamming judgement on them? Thanks.

Angela
You may not believe in God, but He believes in you!

ELI, can we have a definitive ruling on this please? Oh, this reminds me; new Kenickie single out on Monday. Promise, folks. And the album on or around the 24th.

Now, Americans are probably aware of the annoying habit of releasing songs to radio years before they're out as a single. Indeed, such classics as "Torn" and "Iris" are only available on albums or as imports. Something similar is happening in the UK. Sarah McLachlan's "Adia" will be the lead-off single for her "Surfacing" album - set for an October 12 release. The single will come out September 21, but is already on the BRMB and Crapital playlists. Of course, this comes some time after it started getting played on Radio 2, but that's life...

Touching on the design of my web page, Nichole muses about geocities in general
Those popup console ad things just annoy me to death, and lately when I go there I soemtimes get 2 or 3 of those things!

Interesting. They bug me too, but I've never had more than one window spawn on me. And you won't get them on (many of) my pages, as the built-in commercial at the very foot obviates them.
and then now that new umm "watermark" thing that bounces down the page as you scroll... just YUCK, I just want to shoot that thing or something

So do I, mate. It's rotten design, using java, a language that just isn't up to the job they want it to do. It's also a graphic, and that bugs little old graphics-off me.

Back in Birmingham, this coming from German sources.

"Ich bin ein Hoistfeller".
These reports are as yet unconfirmed, but it appears the delegation is, indeed, OK, and will be visiting the Pallisaides next Wednesday before taking scones with butter for tea.

Jennifer Jacobs, yes, you, wonders
You talkin to ME?

Yes indeed. I quite deliberately misintepreted your request for 10 copies of the same URL to be posted again, and started a set of 10 different URLs. Number two in this series comes late next week.

The EU meeting in Salzburg has just broken up; everyone is blaming the Swedes, apparently. In fact, further details are being handed to me even as I type and the meeting has ended early after all the leaders went down with food poisoning, contracted from a rotting swede (the vegetable) at last night's banquet.

Over in Washington, the meeting has also ended, and this is the result. "The average home Internet user wastes just over nine minutes per day, or 55 hours per year, waiting for web pages to load," says the official statement. Reaction has been swift; "It's depressing" says Ira Secret-Magazine-Reeder. "It's criminal," claims Joe Netscrape. "Still a darn sight quicker than waiting for Windoze 98 to install," claims Bill Gates. Of course, this is yet another persuasive argument for not reading list mail on the web but joining the list - it saves you the bother of loading the pages.

And in Birmingham, they've got the joke. Chicken salad.

More madness next time.

Codsall: sunny & 29 ): * jodiesque rockette * ATL 845 SF 0
On weaver.page: girl groups, july's hits, radio and di laine goss


Date: August 7
Subject: fictotum

So, yes, well. Later: customs stamps, what half a gigabyte is, and a brief incursion from Factville. But first..

Given that no-one's said they'll be in London tomorrow, neither will I. Anyone travelling: don't bother, stay home instead.

Ivy (welcome, welcome...)
i am soooo not like sounding to be evil, rude, or whatever

That's an excellent start.
like why cant you, when you send e-mails, put something like [mscl]

Good question. Let me give my reply. Because it's not something that we people should need to do. It should be done on the list computer. If it can be bothered, which I don't think it can.

Also, some e-mail programs only allow a relatively short (like, 50 character) subject line. To waste 14% of that with something of minimal use doesn't strike me as a good idea.
i dont know like what e-mails to open like is it from so-called mailing list or just some junk mail

May I make a suggestion? That you use filters to sort your mail when it arrives. Mail sent to "[email protected]" can go into one folder, mail sent to you directly into another. Would some kind AOL member care to give more exact instructions?
So HI im new and really annoying aint i?

No, not at all. Welcome aboard. We don't bite (first).

Angela
Another one- it's almost impossible to keep up with who is referring to who or what.

Careful use of selective, meaningful quotes and accurate attribution is always useful, folks. Well, I do my best...

I'm not happy with digest 469. Twelve messages from our friend using a free mail account in 44-9'er territory [that's San Fransisco, for those just joining us; renamed following their football side's loss to the KC Chiefs last Dec 1, by the stonking score of (er) 44-9.] And two from me. One from Sara rather lifted the quality, thankfully.

Dealing only with the facts. MDeason
I have ony used this email, to post to this list.

This is patently false. It has also been used to post to lists held at dreamworld.org. It also, rather interestingly, crops up in a search at a mountain biking page held at Stanford Uni.
But now I am getting spammed. Why?? I'll tell you why. It's because
some web sniffer has found the page on mountain biking and taken the address from there.

Sara
I do think that going over every little thing, and trying to reduce is down is. I mean...I *want* the bubble envelope, I want the best of everything, so that nothing breaks on the way.

You seem to forget about Customs Stamps. Vicious little things, they are. Just when you think you've packed something totally securely, along comes an annoying bloke With A Big Hammer and whacks it down on your package. Result: one cracked CD case. Bummer! And, yes, I have the cracked case to prove it.

Brooks wonders
I don't know what makes a list an offical My So-Called Life list. Is it something handed down from on high? Like some sort of divine right of lists?

For my reading, an "official" list would have to be sanctioned, if not organised, by the show's makers, Bedford Falls. I'm not aware of any such blessing on any list, so there is no official list.

ALI comes along and throws her two pennies into the fire of the CD- ROM thing. At least she owns up to writing, this time...
Its personal. Thats all there is to it.

Erm, no it's not. It's me objecting to someone trying to make money off the back of my posts, just hours after I finally get someone else to stop doing that same thing.
Iain and I used to be engaged.

In the same way Bill Clinton used to be President of the USA...
don't think that he has the best feelings towards derrick.

Well, if he tries to profit from my work, that is not going to endear him to me. The other matters she mentioned are red herrings. I don't intend to comment on them further, in order a) not to bore the pants off the whole of the list and b) not to prejudice any court proceedings that may yet arise out of this case.
he uses out-of-date info, from the evening telegram

That was to establish that Derrick was making a profit from these CDs. As this is something he's confirmed to the list, the source of my cost breakdown becomes another total red herring.
If you're listening to all the fuss, please realize that theres personal feelings thrown in there

This is a gross misrepresentation of the situation.
the only people who are seriously fighting this are people who personally don't like derrick.

This isn't personal. This is business. Whether the erstwhile listies care to admit it or not.

So, I guess that if you like all things MSCL, you won't let this bloke line his pockets from your hard work.

And that's all I have to say about that.

From the ridiculous back to the sublime. Kris
Oh, shameless as I am, Im going to get excited about being mentioned in Iians post!

Well, if I knew who that poster was, I might suggest you calm down. Thankfully, it's not one of mine. Here's proof...
HA! I forgot to tell you Iian, I went to your web page and some pictures of you....Hubba Hubba & Cutie Patootie come to mind!! :)

See? Can't be me. Not in the slightest. Me, handsome? [quiet titter] [stifled chortle] [bursts out laughing loud]

Which reminds me. In honour of a goof on Radio Netherlands some years back, I've refered to the frequencies of Gigahertz - and latterly Gigabytes - as Giggle-hertz or -bytes. It's taken me that long to work out what half a Gigglebyte would be.

A Sniggerbyte.

Linette
I live in America. This should be a democracy.

Yes, it should. Yet America is not a democracy. Not when less than 50% of the people can be bothered to elect their own national leader.

Kris remembers musing
"You need a licence to drive and a licences to fish, but they are letting me walk out of this hospital without a licence to be a parent and I am absolutly CLUELESS as to what to do with this child" Thank Heaven that it seems to come naturally. I had the changing of the diaper, the making of the bottle, and cooing thing down real well but as for the whole being a parent thing....nadda clue.

And then The People wonder how come there are so many maladjusted kids around. Kris had doubts, but (AFAIK) has proven a perfectly good parent. Reading between the lines, Angela was also a bag of nerves, but proved perfectly competent at the job. Listeners to the BBC's daily documentary "The Archers" will know that hippie wild-child Kate Aldrige has recently had Baby, and won the affections of most of the village with her sensible handling of her child. (Anyone who wants to discuss Roy's rights and wrongs can mail me off list.)

Personally, I have absolutely no confidence in my ability to parent to the exacting standards I expect of others, and do not intend to drop sprogs of my own. Neither can I express much confidence in those prospective parents who claim that they know what's facing them, and they'll be able to handle it themselves. They won't, and their children will be the ones that will annoy the hell out of people like me. No, I'm better off out of all this reproductive malarkey.

Oh, and there's this little matter, neatly nutshelled by Sara. Though she really may not like the imagery in this section.
Being pregnant, for me, is not a lot of fun.

The Victorian doctors were right. Being pregnant is a ten month long illness. The body is infected by a fast-growing tumour, and acts as though it's first trying to fight it, and latterly to live with it, at the expense of short-term memory and frequent trips to the loo. Again, why anyone would volunteer for this is totally beyond me.

Now, Jennifer looks for 10 good URLs. I'll open the bidding with westmidlands.com, for news and information that's local to me. Read the Depress and Snore, Wolverhampton's local paper. Watch the web site of 107.7 The Wolf, the only local station in town, and the one that's tripled its audience in the last quarter. And, er, do other stuff as well.

Hmm. My favourite beverage. On a hot day like today, iced tea would be nice. Otherwise, nice, strong, flavoured coffee.

Catch you on Sunday, I guess.

Brum: sunny & 26 (TWENTY-SIX) * Hope Springs Eternal!


Date: Queen Ma is 98
Subject: diddle um diddle eye

Well, it now transpires that Eli won't be in London for Saturday. If anyone wants to meet me there, please let me know. Otherwise I'll just stay home and watch the cricket in the garden. Like I did six months ago.

Later, my finale on the archives stuff, plus dating young girls, evening meals, Hallowe'en and cool radio shows. But first,

Shana enquires
what do you all expect/want from the list?

Remember, this response is Not For Discussion. I will not take kindly to discussion or debate arising from it.

I've been around these parts for 34 months now. From half way through the first UK run of MSCL. From the times when I'd be transported across the Atlantic, into Three Rivers with Angela, Brian, Jordan, Rayanne, and the rest. This list understood what this journey was about, in a way (almost) no-one else around me did. It's been company through some really tough times, and celebrated some of my great ones.

There are Real Friends here. People I care about, even if I've not met them. Especially if I've not met them.

It's been a place I can trust my deepest thoughts, worst fears, and most sunny moments to. And it's a place where I can vent such feelings freely, without anyone daring to snigger to my face.

It's a place that I can trust, with people I can trust.

Events over the past six months or so have made me retreat a long way back into my shell. I somehow don't feel safe posting those intimate confessions any more. The protracted spats with the resident of 44-9'er territory have left their mark. People don't trust each other any more.

For me, that trust is paramount. I'm not going to stand by and watch others abuse it. Coz if I don't stand up for my prime motivation, who is? Little matters - like the archives - become symptomatic of the wider problem. There are elements here I don't trust. And when there's an obvious use of a false identity by someone I've trusted more than (probably) any other single listie, that hurts a lot.

Observant people may have noticed that I've hardly talked about my non-resident fiancee in the past few months. Really observant people will remember my asking for people to write me off-list back in May - and thanks to ~Laura, Jenn, Bron, Kris and Nichole for lending an ear back then. But I shouldn't have to do that. I'd like to be able to spill my innermost thoughts to you, without worrying that they'll be held against me.

That's what I want from the list. You can comment on the rest.

I just can't resist going back to WP88. Even though she's unsubbed.
Here Blank Cd's are 4$.

Shop around. You can get them for $1.50 - well, you could over Christmas. [Evening Telegram, 12/27/97, page B4]
Postage to the rest of to the country is around 3$ and to other countries is about 5$ or so.

Is there a Canyuck to back this up?
I'm not interested in the archives - who'd wanna read what people I don't know are saying?

Well, you could always read what you posted yourself. But you know how that would all turn out. And you read most of these posts first time around.
but there could be cool stuff on there.

And you should know!

Another correspondent writes
Derrick - who is just trying to the list a favour..

Start by not posting the same article four times, and not having the grace to apologise for doing so.

Scott makes a reasonable economic argument, but shoots himself in the foot
This is assuming he lives in the US.

Nope. Derrick lives in Canada. Please re-work your argument. But CDs at $1 a throw?! They're GBP 1.50 each here, even at trade prices.

Kori
still can't believe that my mom left the car, but not the KEY!!!! She better not have done that on purpose!!

How the blazes can anyone be quite so dim to do that? I mean, it's just as bad as taking the keys, but forgetting to bring the car along.

Roman is worried about the age gap between one of his friends and her lover. She's 13, he's 26. That is, like, beyond reasonable. Hey, I got worried about being accused of baby snatching for dating someone 3 and a half years my junior, when that was about 15% of my age. Personally, at 25 in a few months, I really couldn't date someone younger than 18. Even if I were in the market, which I'm not. But, to return to the original point, it's beyond acceptable.

Lauren
Next up is Arnold Swartzeneggar & Kate Winslet as an on-screen couple. He requested she lose 10 pounds for the role. How rude!

And we request that he also makes some small bodily sacrifices for this role. Just a brief cut, here, here, and slice through to here.

Sara, on Paterson-the-archive-proprietor
doing something on your own doesn't necessarily mean that its bad.

Oh, totally agreed. However, it's my understanding that the two contacts needed to register a .com domain should (not must, but should) be different people. If nothing else, it vastly increases the chance of someone picking up a message within a day.
Just because there may be a sight saying about this person

This is Paterson's own site. Like, his own words.
so if I wanted to have an archive of my posts, and wanted to put them up on my page..including this message, would that be a problem for you?

Not in the slightest. You see, what you're doing is taking and using my posts in the way I intend them to be used. To debate, to think about, to chew over. I don't send them for people to make money from.

Twelve dollars (or whatever..that is the price, isn't it)
Try 15 US dollars, not 12 loonies.
I also hope that some of the people on this list stop being so petty about all this.

If objecting to someone breaking the basic tenets of my contract with the list is being petty, then I'm being petty. I don't think it is at all petty. Heck, I'm only making this much noise about it because it is important to me.

And let me set one thing straight.
Iain, you offered to copy the cd for the people over here

On a point of fact, I have made no such offer. I do not have the CD to which Ms Hoeck refers. I do not have access to CD duplication equipment. Any requests for CDs to be copied will be rejected for the reasons outlined above. I call on Sara to correct her statement.
Derrick has unsubbed from the list, for anyone that cares. I wonder why

I would comment on this, but Sara added a qualifier that makes any comment from me pointless.

Kori
Unfortunately, we here in Hilo don't have an alternative station.

Why not take one of mine? Point thy browser at OZ FM, and listen to their Real Audio. Now, that's professional radio. Not like the sort that people just throw together in their front rooms and shovel onto the internet regardless of quality. There's a link to one such pile of sh*te.

Mae quotes me
>figured that there's very little sense written from South East Asia.
I was just wondering what you meant by this...

That SE Asia in general, and Hong Kong, Malaysia and Singapore seem to turn out spam, and spam only. Thankfully, Mae is an exception. Sadly, she's the only one I know of.

Angie quotes some Des'ree. It's very interesting that the piece she quoted fits exactly into "Life". Or "You Gotta Be". Or any of her other hits. Spooky!

Laura
since Halloween is on a Saturday, I'm having an all day (and night) bash!

Don't forget the most important part: wish me happy birthday on the stroke of midnight. Always added an extra zip to Hallowe'en parties.

Angela enquires
should Barbie be the new Spice Girl,

No. I'd sooner have Warrior Princess Spice. But Four Spice is preferable.

is Michael's Jackson's nose *really* made out of Silly Putty
No. You're thinking of his cheekbones. His nose is made of plasticine.

what everyone *else* was dining on tonight
Monday night was a grilled cauliflower, cheese and other unidentified vegetables in a breadcrumb coating, and rice an' peas. For two. When it was just me eating them. Oh, and a peach yoghurt.

Shana (Sun)
If Rickie had be 'straight', do you think he and Delia would have started dating after that school dance?

No. He'd never have had the bottle to do it.

Ryan D asks
the question MUST BE ANSWERED!

Ryan, We Know Where You Live. Well, at least down to the nearest planet. And probably the continent. It's a long door-to-door search after that. And you'd probably be out when we called. Let me put that a little more accurately:

Ryan, We Have No Clue Where You Live And Wouldn't Waste Our Time Trying To Trace You, Even If We Wanted To Come Round In The Middle Of The Night And Stuff A Bat Up Your Night Shirt (And We're Not Talking Baseball Either). Oh, and welcome to the list. Just don't ask that question again.

See you all, soon.

Brum: sunny & 21 * Jodie of another lawn * Just, like, be careful


Date: August 1
Subject: commonality

Howdy, pardners. These things need to be said. Given that the admin(s) have taken down the archives, there is no need for me to fire up another list. I will not be sending out subscription details for it, as it no longer exists.

Elaine
I hate Kate Winslet (see Lisa Bing's sister's interview of her in Christmas Vogue for some of the reasons why. I.e., she's a tit)

Lisa's sister speaks highly of you, as well. Oh, sorry, you're calling Kinked Eyebrows a tit...

Well, it appears that over on another list, they're trying to play Desert Island Discs, and making a bit of a mess of it. My entries, and not a word from you, Ms Lawley, are:

  1. "Building the Perfect Beast" - Don Henley;
  2. The first Neds' Atomic Dustbin album;
  3. "Woodface" - Crowded House;
  4. "On the Hour", the tapes thereof;
  5. "Honey Lingers" - Voice of the Beehive;
  6. "From the Choirgirl Hotel" - Tori Amos;
  7. "The Piano Concerto / MGV" - Michael Nyman;
  8. "Play" - Great Big Sea;
  9. "The Hitch-Hikers' Guide to the Galaxy: The First Four Books" - Douglas Adams.
  10. A complete baseball stadium, two teams of robots, and cards for history's great sides.

Shana Sun, [hugs] and some more.

Nichole
For people in the US... you're more likely to be in those web databases. They get the names from the phone books.. unless you have an unlisted number, it's in there.

Isn't that, like, breach of copyright. Even though some Americans seem to take a very liberal attitude to copyrighted matters. But, no, the phone company probably sells them on.
unless you get an unlisted number that year (which costs money and can be annoying to those trying to call you ;-)

Sssh! Don't let British Telecom catch you saying that. Otherwise they might start charging for taking numbers out of the phone book. And that would never do.

Now, spam mails. Check out the Campaign for the Abolition of Unsolicited Commercial Email for moral and practical support. My experience on the front line has been mixed: I've helped close six abused hotmail accounts, had a very nice apology from a misguided cellphone company in Bolton, and figured that there's very little sense written from South East Asia. It's often hard work for nothing more than the satisfaction of a job properly done, and I don't recommend it to anyone who has to pay per minute for their connection.

In general, I don't recommend replying directly to the spammer, as that proves your address is real. Try [email protected], or [email protected] - one or t'other should be staffed. If anyone wants to know more on the topic, mail me (once, please!) off list.

Rachel wrote a post that just had to grab my attention. Heck, with the subject
baseball and weird people

how could I miss it?

Jennifer
Perhaps we should form a society that will only let in members that either refuse to see Titanic, or HAVE seen Titanic and wish they hadn't. So far, it looks as though Eric, Elaine, Iain, Shobi, and myself are proud members. Yep, I've already signed you guys up.

Thanks, thanks. I'll accept membership, and not rag on the movie at all.

I mean it.

Now, D-anon definately wrote
I tink it wuz I wot sent-in dat dere ting.

Whoops, so it was. My mistake. We apologise for the inconvenience caused. One of the wonderful things about keeping one's own archive is that I can fix these little errors, just as they do in Hansard. Though while I just clear up this misattrubition, Toy Bair uses the official record of Parliamentary business to rewrite his whole policy.

Derrick (welcome back ... I think) is selling a CD-ROM. It features
Pictures, Video Clips, Sound Files, Info
MSCL list digests from the begining to August 1997.

Which includes some of my copyrighted work. Here's the deal. Either you cut me in on the profits from your little scam, or you send me one of these for free. Like, nought cents. Oh, or you take my posts out of your archive, but it's probably too late for that. My posts are not, and never will be available for commercial exploitation without my permission by anyone.

And, some Bad Economics.
It'll be selling them postage paid for $12.

Twelve Canadian Dollars. Which, at Thursday's midmarket London closing rates, is (blinkin' Ada!) GBP 4.86
If you live in the US it will be in US funds.

Twelve US Dollars. That's GBP 7.33
If you live outside of North America the cd will cost $15 in US funds (due to extra postage costs)

Fifteen US Dollars. That's GBP 9.16

Now, two years ago, it cost the massive total of C$2.10 to ship a CD across the Atlantic. That's 85 new pence. Which means, dear fellow Brits, that our salesman is making a profit of almost 3.50 (or $8.50, take your pick) on the postage.

What's more, the raw CD is on sale in St John's for just $1.50. Add $2 postage, and a luxurious 50c allowance for electricity, and your CD is made for $4. Even making a decent allowance for research fees, he's still making $6 profit on each and every CD.

Quite frankly, this is an absolute rip-off. Two questions. 1) Why are you allowing him to get away with this? And 2) Why is he ripping off the very people who gave him the material he's flogging back to you?

Shana (Sun)
Time: 6pm (California)

Right, let's get these time zones sorted out once and for all, please. 18:00 Thu in California is (18+8-1-24)=01:00 UTC which equates to:
2pm Tahiti
4pm Hawaii
5pm Alaska
7:30 South Park
9pm Kansas
10pm New York
11pm on PEI
11:30 Newfoundland
2am Friday UK
3am CET
5:30 Iran
7:30 India
9am Perth
10:30 Darwin
11am Hobart
12 New Zealand
These times correct for Northern Hemisphere Daylight Saving Time, and Southern Hemisphere Standard Time.

Nichole
Anyone could keep their own archvies on their own 'puter, and make a CD thing of it if they wanted. the admins have no control over that.

This is indubitably true, but I would expect the admins to quietly have a word in the person's ear. Not jump up and down with the wonderfullness of it all.

So, who is behind this escribe.com? The one reply I got back from them was signed "Scott". From the link Bronwyn provided, I find that the owner and administrative contact for escribe.com is a Scott Paterson. Now, I find it somewhat alarming for a professional, commercial domain to have just one contact.

Bronwyn's sources cite Paterson as techno-savvy enough to set up (and, I believe, abuse) spam filters, and that he has about 10 years of experience in the high-tech world.

Rather ironicly, his home page has the following as a footer "The content on this site may not be republished without permission."

Paterson lives in Menlo Park, California, and works at Be Inc, on an operating system that claims to be radically different from any other. Without translating the company's mission statement from Geek to English, I'm not entirely sure how it does this.

He runs the Saab network, plays forward for a team called "Grasshoppers" in a California state ice hockey league, talks about counting cards in blackjack and details his good and bad experiences as a consumer. Including a banner linking to spam.abuse.net.

My personal view is to give the man the benefit of the doubt, and disagree with speculation that he's trying to create his own spam list. Indeed, if anything, he seems over-protective of his own operations. However, I do believe that he is trying to sell space in the form of banner adverts, which equates to selling our posts.

I'm not going to draw any further inferences about Paterson's character or actions. You're all quite capable of doing that for yourself.

Now, someone calling herself "xenawp88" (bet it's not her real name) writes
well, anyway.. you guys seemed pretty cool, until that rochelle/ shemmlle/whatever person decided to stir

That's shimelle, warrior princess of the plains. If you'd be so kind. And there's a certain irony in all this...
i guess hiding from someone is not a big worry for her.

I think the honourable correspondent is pretending to Jump Straight To Conclusions without knowing one iota of the story behind everything.

and all of this silly archive stuff would be over. because yeah. it is kinda silly.
That is your opinion. Other people may dissent from it.

and well, i didn't read the raging egomaniac post, but i assume its from iain. and well, that's kinda silly too,
Gee, thanks, that's the most constructive thing anyone's said about me this year.
that hes worried that people would sell his posts. i found his page, and they're all up on the internet anyway

Yes, my posts are all on my page. I elect to put them there. Daft as it may sound, I really object to other people copying them for their profit. If anyone's going to make money from my work, I want it to be me.
with quotes from everyone elses posts - so hes posting other peoples words without their permission

No, I am using their words in a way that they have implicitly consented to by posting them to this list. If you post, you're giving other members reasonable room to review and comment on your posts. You will further note that I quote nothing more than I need to illustrate my point.
if someone buys his posts, then hes doing what he says that the maillist is doing to him.

The substantive difference is that I choose to make that archive available. I choose not to have it duplicated, in a vastly inferior format, on some fly-by-night server run by someone whose motives are not the same as mine, and may well be dubious.

as you see, why would anyone want to sell his posts? they're just words, put together in a semi coherent way
Again, you flatter dreadfully. Something you seem to have a real talent for.
and instead of doing a post per thing he just puts them all in one.

Something to do with saving the bandwidth; roll 25 messages into one, thus reducing the header space used by 96% and the total bandwidth by around 50%.

i do have some issues with his adoption of newfoundland as my great auntie is from there and thanks confederation for many things that he can't understand as i've noticed hes not from there
To address what appears to be the actual point, I have no problem with NF being part of Canada. Indeed, it's a great move for both sides, so long as they respect each other, which (IMO) isn't happening.

he reminds me of that alfredo guy
Is there a lawyer on the list? Isn't that actionable? Dr Demeter?

do you know me?
Are these addressed to me? Yes. I know you. You know that I know you.
do you know anyone on the list well enough to trust them?

Yes. If you treat people like kids, don't expect them not to act like kids.
i don't trust anyone

That is your choice.

since its still going on, with people obviously using it to further their own personal vendettas against others
Erm, what vendetta am I meant to have in this? Being totally pissed off with what I see as weak administrating? I plead guilty. Having something personal against the admin(s)? Not on your nelly. Being rather annoyed that a long-standing resident of this list stoops to posing as a newbie to get their point across? That's not personal, that's business.

And besides, I think the whole battle has now ended. So far as I'm concerned, it's now over.

Our Scott asks
2. What do you sleep in?

A bed.
5. If one MSCL character could make a cameo on Party of Five, who would you chose and why?

Oh, let's have Brian comparing notes with Julia. Showing everyone - especially Griffin - that she does have a life.
7. Do you believe in past lives?
8. Do you believe in reincarnation?

Yes, yes. Don't these two go together, somehow?
14. Do you believe in magic?

Yes.
15. Better to put off today what you can do tomorrow or vice versa?

Sometimes, but not always. If it's out of the way, it's done and dusted and there's more time for fun things.

Mae's wisdom teeth. You have my sympathies. My top pair came out when I was 19, but the bottoms are impacted and that would take time in hospital. Though they don't hurt at all, and so long as that's the case, I'm happy with them.

And with that, I'm gone. More in a day or two.

Codsall: wet & 19 * Why do we hate Billie? Because we want to!


front local mscl music news sport
mail me

This page updated August 23, 1998
Hosted by www.Geocities.ws

1